<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethical naturalism redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2003/07/30/ethical-naturalism-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/07/30/ethical-naturalism-redux/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsquared</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/07/30/ethical-naturalism-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>dsquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=92#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear; I think it would be a good thing if GAC&#039;s argument mirrored the Achilles one, because I think that one&#039;s rock-solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just to be clear; I think it would be a good thing if <span class="caps">GAC</span>&#8217;s argument mirrored the Achilles one, because I think that one&#8217;s rock-solid.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/07/30/ethical-naturalism-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=92#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>GAC thinks he avoids what Achilles says to the tortoise, and what he (Jerry) says seems roughly plausible to me. But I think there&#039;s actually a naturalist response to GAC that mimics the rhetorical structure of his &quot;facts and principles&quot; conjecture, and forces GAC to take some stands on the metaethical issues he claims to be indifferent towards. More on this later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">GAC</span> thinks he avoids what Achilles says to the tortoise, and what he (Jerry) says seems roughly plausible to me. But I think there&#8217;s actually a naturalist response to <span class="caps">GAC</span> that mimics the rhetorical structure of his &#8220;facts and principles&#8221; conjecture, and forces <span class="caps">GAC</span> to take some stands on the metaethical issues he claims to be indifferent towards. More on this later.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsquared</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/07/30/ethical-naturalism-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>dsquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=92#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>It looks to me to have a distinct flavour of Lewis Carroll&#039;s argument in &quot;Achilles and the Tortoise&quot; which showed that in mathematical logic, inference rules have to be on a separate logical level from axioms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It looks to me to have a distinct flavour of Lewis Carroll&#8217;s argument in &#8220;Achilles and the Tortoise&#8221; which showed that in mathematical logic, inference rules have to be on a separate logical level from axioms.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

