<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clint Eastwood as Rousseau&#8217;s lawgiver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/03/clint-eastwood-as-rousseaus-lawgiver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/03/clint-eastwood-as-rousseaus-lawgiver/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Victor Muniz</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/03/clint-eastwood-as-rousseaus-lawgiver/comment-page-1/#comment-2996</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Muniz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2003 15:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=212#comment-2996</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget Christine Korsgaard&#039;s excellent Kantian reading of John Wayne in &quot;The Man who Shot Liberty Valance&quot; (&quot;Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution&quot; in the Festschrift for John Rawls, Reclaiming the History of Ethics). The point is similar: the legal order is founded on an act that is pre- or even anti-legal. The &quot;founder&quot; (Jimmy Stewart) is a fraud, because the real break between outlawry and the civilized order is a (hidden) violent act. In the end, whoever prevails can claim rightful obedience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Don&#8217;t forget Christine Korsgaard&#8217;s excellent Kantian reading of John Wayne in &#8220;The Man who Shot Liberty Valance&#8221; (&#8220;Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution&#8221; in the Festschrift for John Rawls, Reclaiming the History of Ethics). The point is similar: the legal order is founded on an act that is pre- or even anti-legal. The &#8220;founder&#8221; (Jimmy Stewart) is a fraud, because the real break between outlawry and the civilized order is a (hidden) violent act. In the end, whoever prevails can claim rightful obedience.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/03/clint-eastwood-as-rousseaus-lawgiver/comment-page-1/#comment-2995</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Tuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2003 20:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=212#comment-2995</guid>
		<description>Up next, Baruch Spinoza and his influence on the films of Bud Spencer and Terance Hill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Up next, Baruch Spinoza and his influence on the films of Bud Spencer and Terance Hill.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
