<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Islamic vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Burf.com</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator>Burf.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=348#comment-4764</guid>
		<description>Hey my search engine just found this siteplease check www.burf.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey my search engine just found this siteplease check <a href="http://www.burf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.burf.com</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admiral Waugh</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>Admiral Waugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=348#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>I remember watching that endorsement for Bush, and it&#039;s not so far fetched as a political alliance. It&#039;s also more than obvious that many Republicans have long been more favorable to certain Arab groups, not the least of which would be those in favor of Palestine-statehood. Also, if I recall from the latest poll numbers, older Jews still tend to be wildly left while the younger ones are beginning to err right... though I am unsure of a correlation with 9/11 for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I remember watching that endorsement for Bush, and it&#8217;s not so far fetched as a political alliance. It&#8217;s also more than obvious that many Republicans have long been more favorable to certain Arab groups, not the least of which would be those in favor of Palestine-statehood. Also, if I recall from the latest poll numbers, older Jews still tend to be wildly left while the younger ones are beginning to err right&#8230; though I am unsure of a correlation with 9/11 for that.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bragg</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bragg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=348#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>Point of caution on the numbers on the 2000 US election:  Those numbers all either come from Grover Norquist, who engineered the alliance between the Republican PArty and the Muslim/Arab political action groups, or from the Muslim/ARab political action groups.  Both have a strong interest in inflating both their audience and their effectiveness.  &quot;It is estimated&quot; by those with an interest in inflating the estimate.  I, myself, am a rightwing nut.  I&#039;m just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Point of caution on the numbers on the 2000 US election:  Those numbers all either come from Grover Norquist, who engineered the alliance between the Republican PArty and the Muslim/Arab political action groups, or from the Muslim/ARab political action groups.  Both have a strong interest in inflating both their audience and their effectiveness.  &#8220;It is estimated&#8221; by those with an interest in inflating the estimate.  I, myself, am a rightwing nut.  I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabakov</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=348#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>An Australian perspective would be v. interesting.&quot;Inner city branchstacking plus reasonably adroit work with multicultural funding bodies does tend to generally produce a mildly Tammany Hall kinda scenerio downunder vis a vis the Muslim vote and Labor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>An Australian perspective would be v. interesting.&#8221;Inner city branchstacking plus reasonably adroit work with multicultural funding bodies does tend to generally produce a mildly Tammany Hall kinda scenerio downunder vis a vis the Muslim vote and Labor.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/27/the-islamic-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=348#comment-4760</guid>
		<description>Well the piece is interesting, but it doesn&#039;t go much of anywhere. In Britain, somehow I just can&#039;t see the Tory candidates and organization warming up to immigrant voters, no matter how socially conservative those immigrants might be.Likewise Germany. Can anyone out there wrap their mind around a big chunk of Muslim voters plumping for the &lt;i&gt;Christian&lt;/i&gt; Democrats? Me neither. Plus on issues, the Social Democrats and the Greens are the ones who put through citizenship reform, green cards and other pro-immigrant policies. The CDU was still nurturing the illusion that German birth rates were going to buck a hundred-year trend, magically rise and rescue the country&#039;s welfare system without immigration. (To say nothing of the right&#039;s attitude toward Turkish entry to the EU, which is inded the best thing to say about the CDU/CSU&#039;s approach to an issue that is, not surprisingly, important to Turkish-Germans.)I wish I knew enough about the details of French electoral politics to say.I&#039;d say that on balance Muslim voters tend to vote center-left (or possibly post-materialist, if you will), and that pro-immigrant policies can bring them in to parties on the left side of the spectrum. If they are alienated, they&#039;ll tend to not vote, rather than pull the lever for the center-right parties, most of whom have long anti-immigrant records. The center-right parties also have regular voters who have an antipathy to immigrants and would likely defect to the far right parties if the center-right took a more immigrant-friendly stance. The big European countries have a long way to go to come to grips with immigration before there&#039;s much competition for the immigrant vote.ps An Australian perspective would be v. interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well the piece is interesting, but it doesn&#8217;t go much of anywhere. In Britain, somehow I just can&#8217;t see the Tory candidates and organization warming up to immigrant voters, no matter how socially conservative those immigrants might be.Likewise Germany. Can anyone out there wrap their mind around a big chunk of Muslim voters plumping for the <i>Christian</i> Democrats? Me neither. Plus on issues, the Social Democrats and the Greens are the ones who put through citizenship reform, green cards and other pro-immigrant policies. The <span class="caps">CDU</span> was still nurturing the illusion that German birth rates were going to buck a hundred-year trend, magically rise and rescue the country&#8217;s welfare system without immigration. (To say nothing of the right&#8217;s attitude toward Turkish entry to the EU, which is inded the best thing to say about the <span class="caps">CDU</span>/CSU&#8217;s approach to an issue that is, not surprisingly, important to Turkish-Germans.)I wish I knew enough about the details of French electoral politics to say.I&#8217;d say that on balance Muslim voters tend to vote center-left (or possibly post-materialist, if you will), and that pro-immigrant policies can bring them in to parties on the left side of the spectrum. If they are alienated, they&#8217;ll tend to not vote, rather than pull the lever for the center-right parties, most of whom have long anti-immigrant records. The center-right parties also have regular voters who have an antipathy to immigrants and would likely defect to the far right parties if the center-right took a more immigrant-friendly stance. The big European countries have a long way to go to come to grips with immigration before there&#8217;s much competition for the immigrant vote.ps An Australian perspective would be v. interesting.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
