<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rawls and the Law at Fordham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2003/11/07/rawls-and-the-law-at-fordham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/11/07/rawls-and-the-law-at-fordham/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Solum</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/11/07/rawls-and-the-law-at-fordham/comment-page-1/#comment-7670</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Solum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 03:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=551#comment-7670</guid>
		<description>There is a controversy in metaethics as to whether moral propositions (and thus the propositions of Rawls&#039;s theory) can be true or false.  Rawls wants to avoid this controversy in metaethics, and so he brackets the &quot;truth-status&quot; of his claims.  Email me if you would like a more detailed answer to this question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There is a controversy in metaethics as to whether moral propositions (and thus the propositions of Rawls&#8217;s theory) can be true or false.  Rawls wants to avoid this controversy in metaethics, and so he brackets the &#8220;truth-status&#8221; of his claims.  Email me if you would like a more detailed answer to this question.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shai</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/11/07/rawls-and-the-law-at-fordham/comment-page-1/#comment-7669</link>
		<dc:creator>Shai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=551#comment-7669</guid>
		<description>solum is the man.can someone explain to me in more detail what &quot;brackets truth&quot; means in the 11th post? i can guess at it, but the context isn&#039;t as helpful as i&#039;d like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>solum is the man.can someone explain to me in more detail what &#8220;brackets truth&#8221; means in the 11th post? i can guess at it, but the context isn&#8217;t as helpful as i&#8217;d like</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence Solum</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/11/07/rawls-and-the-law-at-fordham/comment-page-1/#comment-7668</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence Solum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2003 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=551#comment-7668</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just finished the last post in the series.  There are twelve in total.  THe series started on November 7 and continues through November 8.  You can follow Micah&#039;s link and scroll up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve just finished the last post in the series.  There are twelve in total.  THe series started on November 7 and continues through November 8.  You can follow Micah&#8217;s link and scroll up.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
