<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2003/12/10/congratulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/12/10/congratulations/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:34:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PG</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2003/12/10/congratulations/comment-page-1/#comment-10405</link>
		<dc:creator>PG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=722#comment-10405</guid>
		<description>Oh, babies :-)Of the three bloggers I read who have produced progeny in the last year, all of them were men. I realize that the blogosphere generally and my reading list particularly is heavily slanted toward men, but what&#039;s wrong with the female bloggers? Why aren&#039;t they popping any babies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, babies :-)Of the three bloggers I read who have produced progeny in the last year, all of them were men. I realize that the blogosphere generally and my reading list particularly is heavily slanted toward men, but what&#8217;s wrong with the female bloggers? Why aren&#8217;t they popping any babies?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
