<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: En masse resignation of journal editorial board</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/en-masse-resignation-of-journal-editorial-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/en-masse-resignation-of-journal-editorial-board/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:12:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Burke</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/en-masse-resignation-of-journal-editorial-board/comment-page-1/#comment-16634</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1039#comment-16634</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is because ACM already has high-quality journals, though undoubtedly that helps (as does familiarity with the basic possibilities of online media). I actually don&#039;t see any real reason why such an en masse resignation is impossible or unlikely in other contexts. That&#039;s the whole point about the peer review aspect of journals, the thing that makes them prestigious: it&#039;s almost entirely done on a volunteer basis, and so is (in theory) completely mobile to open-access models of publication. There really is nothing that keeps other fields from making the leap except inertia. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t think this is because <span class="caps">ACM</span> already has high-quality journals, though undoubtedly that helps (as does familiarity with the basic possibilities of online media). I actually don&#8217;t see any real reason why such an en masse resignation is impossible or unlikely in other contexts. That&#8217;s the whole point about the peer review aspect of journals, the thing that makes them prestigious: it&#8217;s almost entirely done on a volunteer basis, and so is (in theory) completely mobile to open-access models of publication. There really is nothing that keeps other fields from making the leap except inertia.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
