<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The black Spartacus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/comment-page-1/#comment-16733</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1042#comment-16733</guid>
		<description>James is wonderful, but rather Stalinist.  Lots of stuff about how necessary Toussaint&#039;s despotism and forced labor projects were, and so forth.  Has anybody written a more measured account in latter years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>James is wonderful, but rather Stalinist.  Lots of stuff about how necessary Toussaint&#8217;s despotism and forced labor projects were, and so forth.  Has anybody written a more measured account in latter years?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad Barwa</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/comment-page-1/#comment-16732</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Barwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1042#comment-16732</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;For those who don’t know his story, C.L.R. James’s The Black Jacobins is the place to look.&lt;/i&gt;Peter Hallward also did a good summation of the Haitian Revolution in &lt;i&gt;Radical Philosophy&lt;/i&gt;; bit strong on the revolutionary romanticism but then we are talking about the first major act of Black auto-emancipation in the New World; which has rarely been equalled in its impact, even if the revolutionary regime did degenerate:http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/default.asp?channel_id=2187&amp;editorial_id=14344</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>For those who don&#8217;t know his story, C.L.R. James&#8217;s The Black Jacobins is the place to look.</i>Peter Hallward also did a good summation of the Haitian Revolution in <i>Radical Philosophy</i>; bit strong on the revolutionary romanticism but then we are talking about the first major act of Black auto-emancipation in the New World; which has rarely been equalled in its impact, even if the revolutionary regime did degenerate:<a href="http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/default.asp?channel_id=2187&#038;editorial_id=14344" rel="nofollow">http://www.radicalphilosophy.com/default.asp?channel_id=2187&#038;editorial_id=14344</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/comment-page-1/#comment-16731</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1042#comment-16731</guid>
		<description>Besides, look at it, for heaven&#039;s sake - it&#039;s not a bit purple.  Plough, head, dungeon, miserable, patience, bonds, fallen, rise, comfort, powers, air, earth, skies, wind, allies, agonies, mind?  What&#039;s so purple?!  Exaltation and unconquered maybe, but the rest?  Not purple at all!  Of the earth earthy.  Peasanty in fact.  Or is it the sentiment that&#039;s purple?  Well...maybe a bit, but moving all the same, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Besides, look at it, for heaven&#8217;s sake &#8211; it&#8217;s not a bit purple.  Plough, head, dungeon, miserable, patience, bonds, fallen, rise, comfort, powers, air, earth, skies, wind, allies, agonies, mind?  What&#8217;s so purple?!  Exaltation and unconquered maybe, but the rest?  Not purple at all!  Of the earth earthy.  Peasanty in fact.  Or is it the sentiment that&#8217;s purple?  Well&#8230;maybe a bit, but moving all the same, I think.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Benson</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/comment-page-1/#comment-16730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1042#comment-16730</guid>
		<description>Oh, no - I love Wordsworth.  The very opposite of ugh.  Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh, no &#8211; I love Wordsworth.  The very opposite of ugh.  Great stuff.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew  Edwards</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/10/the-black-spartacus/comment-page-1/#comment-16729</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew  Edwards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1042#comment-16729</guid>
		<description>God, romatic poetry can be purple. Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>God, romatic poetry can be purple. Ugh.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

