<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damn you, Bill Gates!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran Healy</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19491</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19491</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;so perhaps there’s some freeware utility that can spell check a TeX/LaTeX doc without barfing on all the directives. &lt;/i&gt;On the Mac, it&#039;s called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/~excalibr/excalibur.html&quot;&gt;Excalibur&lt;/a&gt;. I use Emacs (on my Mac), which comes with &lt;a href=&quot;http://fmg-www.cs.ucla.edu/fmg-members/geoff/ispell.html&quot;&gt;ispell&lt;/a&gt;. On Windows, I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.winedt.com&quot;&gt;WinEdt&lt;/a&gt; has a spell checker built in. As a further geeky aside, I am waiting for the day that Excalibur becomes a Services application. Never mind what that means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>so perhaps there&#8217;s some freeware utility that can spell check a TeX/LaTeX doc without barfing on all the directives. </i>On the Mac, it&#8217;s called <a href="http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/~excalibr/excalibur.html">Excalibur</a>. I use Emacs (on my Mac), which comes with <a href="http://fmg-www.cs.ucla.edu/fmg-members/geoff/ispell.html">ispell</a>. On Windows, I think <a href="http://www.winedt.com">WinEdt</a> has a spell checker built in. As a further geeky aside, I am waiting for the day that Excalibur becomes a Services application. Never mind what that means.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtiss Leung</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19490</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtiss Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19490</guid>
		<description>TeX and LaTeX are the best&#8212;if you already have clean copy.&#160;I have to confess it&#039;s been a while since I used LaTeX, so perhaps there&#039;s some freeware utility that can spell check a TeX/LaTeX doc without barfing on all the directives.  To me at least, though, no other font looks as good as Computer Modern Roman.As for the MS-Word grammar checker, turn it off.  It is junk up with which one should not put.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>TeX and LaTeX are the best&mdash;if you already have clean copy.&nbsp;I have to confess it&#8217;s been a while since I used LaTeX, so perhaps there&#8217;s some freeware utility that can spell check a TeX/LaTeX doc without barfing on all the directives.  To me at least, though, no other font looks as good as Computer Modern Roman.As for the MS-Word grammar checker, turn it off.  It is junk up with which one should not put.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19489</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19489</guid>
		<description>Russell,Not only do I use Wordperfect, I still use Wordperfect 6.2 for DOS (though I have a current Windows version installed as well; all versions of WP have the &quot;reveal codes&quot; feature). I run Windows 98SE, which has an excellent implementation of DOS, and WP-Dos 6.2 is still the fastest, most writer-friendly word processor ever compiled (including an excellent dictionary). It will install and run well under Windows XP, but I wouldn&#039;t recommend it to younger users who have grown up knowing only operating systems with a GUI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Russell,Not only do I use Wordperfect, I still use Wordperfect 6.2 for <span class="caps">DOS </span>(though I have a current Windows version installed as well; all versions of WP have the &#8220;reveal codes&#8221; feature). I run Windows 98SE, which has an excellent implementation of <span class="caps">DOS</span>, and WP-Dos 6.2 is still the fastest, most writer-friendly word processor ever compiled (including an excellent dictionary). It will install and run well under Windows XP, but I wouldn&#8217;t recommend it to younger users who have grown up knowing only operating systems with a <span class="caps">GUI</span>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Arben Fox</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19488</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Arben Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19488</guid>
		<description>Hal&#039;s right: just use WordPerfect people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hal&#8217;s right: just use WordPerfect people.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt Pohl</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19487</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt Pohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19487</guid>
		<description>Ooo, he&#039;s gonna get you now.  He didn&#039;t become worth 50 billion dollars for nothing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ooo, he&#8217;s gonna get you now.  He didn&#8217;t become worth 50 billion dollars for nothing&#8230;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarek</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19486</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19486</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re on the subject of Word-bashing, be sure to dig up Louis Menand&#039;s wonderful New Yorker &lt;a&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; on the perils of &quot;end matter&quot; from October. He&#039;s dead-on on the near-impossibility of doing footnotes in Word--as the academics who frequent (and write) this site are no doubt aware.One excerpt:Finally, there is the moment when you realize that your notes are starting to appear in 12-pt. Courier New. Word, it seems, has, at some arbitrary point in the proceedings, decided that although you have been typing happily away in Times New Roman, you really want to be in the default font of the original document. You are confident that you can lick this thing: you painstakingly position your cursor in the Endnotes window (not the text!, where irreparable damage may occur) and click Edit, then the powerful Select All; you drag the arrow to Normal (praying that your finger doesn’t lose contact with the mouse, in which case the window will disappear, and trying not to wonder what the difference between Normal and Clear Formatting might be) and then, in the little window to the right, to Times New Roman. You triumphantly click, and find that you are indeed back in Times New Roman but that all your italics have been removed. What about any of this can be considered “high-speed”?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>While we&#8217;re on the subject of Word-bashing, be sure to dig up Louis Menand&#8217;s wonderful New Yorker <a>article</a> on the perils of &#8220;end matter&#8221; from October. He&#8217;s dead-on on the near-impossibility of doing footnotes in Word&#8212;as the academics who frequent (and write) this site are no doubt aware.One excerpt:Finally, there is the moment when you realize that your notes are starting to appear in 12-pt. Courier New. Word, it seems, has, at some arbitrary point in the proceedings, decided that although you have been typing happily away in Times New Roman, you really want to be in the default font of the original document. You are confident that you can lick this thing: you painstakingly position your cursor in the Endnotes window (not the text!, where irreparable damage may occur) and click Edit, then the powerful Select All; you drag the arrow to Normal (praying that your finger doesn&#8217;t lose contact with the mouse, in which case the window will disappear, and trying not to wonder what the difference between Normal and Clear Formatting might be) and then, in the little window to the right, to Times New Roman. You triumphantly click, and find that you are indeed back in Times New Roman but that all your italics have been removed. What about any of this can be considered &#8220;high-speed&#8221;?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19485</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19485</guid>
		<description>As others have noted, the grammar checking can be turned off. A much more serious problem with current versions of Word is its thesaurus, which has been bowdlerized (since Word 97 I believe; I haven&#039;t checked the Office 2003 version, but I can&#039;t imagine they&#039;ve had a change of heart), so that &lt;i&gt;offensive&lt;/i&gt; words like &quot;whore&quot; or even &quot;obscene&quot; are no longer available. Try it yourself. That&#039;s one of the reasons I still have WordPerfect installed on my machine (one of the others is the excellent &quot;Reveal Codes&quot; feature) and why I&#039;ve had to resort as well to third-party dictionaries (WordWeb is a handy one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As others have noted, the grammar checking can be turned off. A much more serious problem with current versions of Word is its thesaurus, which has been bowdlerized (since Word 97 I believe; I haven&#8217;t checked the Office 2003 version, but I can&#8217;t imagine they&#8217;ve had a change of heart), so that <i>offensive</i> words like &#8220;whore&#8221; or even &#8220;obscene&#8221; are no longer available. Try it yourself. That&#8217;s one of the reasons I still have WordPerfect installed on my machine (one of the others is the excellent &#8220;Reveal Codes&#8221; feature) and why I&#8217;ve had to resort as well to third-party dictionaries (WordWeb is a handy one).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jholbo</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19484</link>
		<dc:creator>jholbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19484</guid>
		<description>Yeah, even as I was typing this little post I knew in my heart that I could surely have done something to prevent the whole travesty. But something there is in my human nature - a sullen, essential orneriness - that keeps me from adjusting my preferences so that life goes better. Some sort of lesson in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah, even as I was typing this little post I knew in my heart that I could surely have done something to prevent the whole travesty. But something there is in my human nature &#8211; a sullen, essential orneriness &#8211; that keeps me from adjusting my preferences so that life goes better. Some sort of lesson in that.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McG</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19483</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19483</guid>
		<description>The truly blessed use LaTeX.[for &#039;tis a thing of beauty]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The truly blessed use LaTeX.[for &#8216;tis a thing of beauty]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Nielsen Hayden</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19482</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Nielsen Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19482</guid>
		<description>Not to spoil a perfectly fine bit of Word-bashing, but in fact it&#039;s perfectly possible to get it to spell-check without also being blessed with its (often batty) opinions of your grammar and style.Just unclick &quot;Check Grammar With Spelling&quot; in the spelling-and-grammar section of Options.As it was said by the prophets, Word is a perfectly good word-processing program, so long as you clean and gut it first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not to spoil a perfectly fine bit of Word-bashing, but in fact it&#8217;s perfectly possible to get it to spell-check without also being blessed with its (often batty) opinions of your grammar and style.Just unclick &#8220;Check Grammar With Spelling&#8221; in the spelling-and-grammar section of Options.As it was said by the prophets, Word is a perfectly good word-processing program, so long as you clean and gut it first.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad Jim</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/02/28/damn-you-bill-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-19481</link>
		<dc:creator>bad Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1151#comment-19481</guid>
		<description>And what is else not to be overcome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And what is else not to be overcome?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

