<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Unpunkables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Gordon</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23573</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23573</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that the original &quot;Punk the NR&quot; message attracted dozens of comments from conservatives who insisted that you were holding the NR to an unfairly high standard, because of course everybody understands that when they read an anonymous smear in the Corner it may or may not be true, so shame on you for trying to flood them with untrue anonymous smears, and liberals have cooties.And yet the NR itself responded to your challenge by ... well ... raising their standards, if only by a few inches, for what they&#039;re willing to print on their site.Is this what the economists call a &quot;revealed preference&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s interesting that the original &#8220;Punk the NR&#8221; message attracted dozens of comments from conservatives who insisted that you were holding the NR to an unfairly high standard, because of course everybody understands that when they read an anonymous smear in the Corner it may or may not be true, so shame on you for trying to flood them with untrue anonymous smears, and liberals have cooties.And yet the NR itself responded to your challenge by &#8230; well &#8230; raising their standards, if only by a few inches, for what they&#8217;re willing to print on their site.Is this what the economists call a &#8220;revealed preference&#8221;?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Barlow</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23572</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23572</guid>
		<description>I emailed Jonah (and the general &quot;The Corner&quot; address) last week to gave them a chance to pick a charity. They didn&#039;t respond, so I just went with Habitat. I know what you mean, though; I didn&#039;t donate the money to Kerry or something because I thought that Jonah would (reasonably) see that as a slap in the face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I emailed Jonah (and the general &#8220;The Corner&#8221; address) last week to gave them a chance to pick a charity. They didn&#8217;t respond, so I just went with Habitat. I know what you mean, though; I didn&#8217;t donate the money to Kerry or something because I thought that Jonah would (reasonably) see that as a slap in the face.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdw</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23571</link>
		<dc:creator>jdw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23571</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the proper etiquette for making a charitable donation in somebody else&#039;s name?  Shouldn&#039;t you give to a charity that that person might approve of?  I&#039;m sure the Jimmy Carter connection alone would be enough to make Goldberg bristle.  And letting somebody else build you a house seems an awful lot like freeloading.  The only way those damn Hondurans are ever going to get off welfare and start working for a living is if people like Jimmy Carter stop giving them houses.If anyone&#039;s unaware, btw, Goldberg&#039;s writing a book about how Fascism is leftist.  I assume the Clintons are involved, somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What&#8217;s the proper etiquette for making a charitable donation in somebody else&#8217;s name?  Shouldn&#8217;t you give to a charity that that person might approve of?  I&#8217;m sure the Jimmy Carter connection alone would be enough to make Goldberg bristle.  And letting somebody else build you a house seems an awful lot like freeloading.  The only way those damn Hondurans are ever going to get off welfare and start working for a living is if people like Jimmy Carter stop giving them houses.If anyone&#8217;s unaware, btw, Goldberg&#8217;s writing a book about how Fascism is leftist.  I assume the Clintons are involved, somehow.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23570</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 15:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23570</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amused by the comment below the successful entry, Derbyshire saying, &quot;I practically **AM** Arthur C. Clarke.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m amused by the comment below the successful entry, Derbyshire saying, &#8220;I practically <b>AM</b> Arthur C. Clarke.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Barlow</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23569</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23569</guid>
		<description>Doh! Thanks, Chris.Digamma, I don&#039;t know who that guy is; he didn&#039;t email me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Doh! Thanks, Chris.Digamma, I don&#8217;t know who that guy is; he didn&#8217;t email me.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digamma</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23568</link>
		<dc:creator>digamma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 14:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23568</guid>
		<description>I thought &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/04_02_01_corner-archive.asp#024350&quot;&gt;this guy&lt;/a&gt; won the contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I thought <a HREF="http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/04_02_01_corner-archive.asp#024350">this guy</a> won the contest.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bertram</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23567</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bertram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 08:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23567</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve fixed the posting date: hope that&#039;s ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve fixed the posting date: hope that&#8217;s ok.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/06/the-unpunkables/comment-page-1/#comment-23566</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 08:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1340#comment-23566</guid>
		<description>Ted, I&#039;ve been known to fiddle with posting times myself, but June 1 seems a long way in the future.Congratulations on the success of your contest. I&#039;m sure Jonah will be pleased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ted, I&#8217;ve been known to fiddle with posting times myself, but June 1 seems a long way in the future.Congratulations on the success of your contest. I&#8217;m sure Jonah will be pleased.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
