<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bootsie Barker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave F</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24650</guid>
		<description>Since this thread abounds with bedtime-reading critics,  a valuable breed, has there been a sequel to The Gruffalo (my grandson&#039;s all-time favourite, and one I enjoyed reading to him ... again and again and again)? If so, is it worth bothering with?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Since this thread abounds with bedtime-reading critics,  a valuable breed, has there been a sequel to The Gruffalo (my grandson&#8217;s all-time favourite, and one I enjoyed reading to him &#8230; again and again and again)? If so, is it worth bothering with?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hew diolch</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24649</link>
		<dc:creator>hew diolch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24649</guid>
		<description>Good: Angela&#039;s AshesBad: That piece of shite sequel, whatever the fuck it was called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good: Angela&#8217;s AshesBad: That piece of shite sequel, whatever the fuck it was called.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24648</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24648</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure about the sequence, but I thought Louis Sachar&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Holes&lt;/i&gt; was superb and anything else from him was dreary.  &lt;i&gt;Holes&lt;/i&gt; won the Newberry prize in 1999, but coincidentally most of the other winners have been dreary too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m not sure about the sequence, but I thought Louis Sachar&#8217;s <i>Holes</i> was superb and anything else from him was dreary.  <i>Holes</i> won the Newberry prize in 1999, but coincidentally most of the other winners have been dreary too.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24647</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 21:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24647</guid>
		<description>As long as we&#039;re on children&#039;s books --Good to excellent: all of Robert Munsch&#039;s output, exceptVile and intolerable: &quot;Love You Forever.&quot;(Who ghost-wrote that?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As long as we&#8217;re on children&#8217;s books&#8212;Good to excellent: all of Robert Munsch&#8217;s output, exceptVile and intolerable: &#8220;Love You Forever.&#8221;(Who ghost-wrote that?)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Weiner</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24646</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24646</guid>
		<description>I disagree with both Anita and Laura; I thought &lt;i&gt;Amber Spyglass&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;was&lt;/b&gt; horrible.  It blighted the first two books for me.If we want to talk about slow irrevocable spirals out of control, there&#039;s the Berkeley Breathed oeuvre, starting high and then just getting worse and worse (with a possible uptick around the time of &lt;i&gt;Billy and the Boingers Bootleg&lt;/i&gt;).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I disagree with both Anita and Laura; I thought <i>Amber Spyglass</i> <b>was</b> horrible.  It blighted the first two books for me.If we want to talk about slow irrevocable spirals out of control, there&#8217;s the Berkeley Breathed oeuvre, starting high and then just getting worse and worse (with a possible uptick around the time of <i>Billy and the Boingers Bootleg</i>).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjc</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24645</link>
		<dc:creator>mjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24645</guid>
		<description>BTW, there are &lt;i&gt;no&lt;/i&gt; sequels to &lt;i&gt;Rendezvous with Rama&lt;/i&gt;, and Gentry Lee is the product of a deranged imagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">BTW</span>, there are <i>no</i> sequels to <i>Rendezvous with Rama</i>, and Gentry Lee is the product of a deranged imagination.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjc</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24644</link>
		<dc:creator>mjc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24644</guid>
		<description>In answer to the question “Who ghost-wrote &lt;i&gt;Dune&lt;/i&gt;?”, I would nominate John W Campbell, the notoriously controlling editor of &lt;i&gt;Astounding&lt;/i&gt;, wherein the initial version of &lt;i&gt;Dune&lt;/i&gt; was published as a serial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In answer to the question &#8220;Who ghost-wrote <i>Dune</i>?&#8221;, I would nominate John W Campbell, the notoriously controlling editor of <i>Astounding</i>, wherein the initial version of <i>Dune</i> was published as a serial.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24643</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 06:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24643</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmnn.  I am far from the illustrated books days, although everything Jan Brett produced had redeming social value.  (the intro to her site doesn&#039;t do her justice)http://www.janbrett.com/I am particularly fond of Fritz &amp; The Beautiful Horseshttp://www.janbrett.com/fritz.htmwhich is a real true story, as opposed to the loathsome set of stories about a fish with a beautiful scale, which makes other fish envious, therefore he has to share....help me out here, toddler parents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hmmmmnn.  I am far from the illustrated books days, although everything Jan Brett produced had redeming social value.  (the intro to her site doesn&#8217;t do her justice)<a href="http://www.janbrett.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.janbrett.com/</a>I am particularly fond of Fritz &#038; The Beautiful Horses<a href="http://www.janbrett.com/fritz.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.janbrett.com/fritz.htm</a>which is a real true story, as opposed to the loathsome set of stories about a fish with a beautiful scale, which makes other fish envious, therefore he has to share&#8230;.help me out here, toddler parents&#8230;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura, 11d</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24642</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura, 11d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24642</guid>
		<description>Agree that pig/pancake is not quite as good as mouse /cookie.  Another one hit wonder of children&#039;s books.A fine second book is Click, Clack, Moo, which was a follow up to Giggle, Giggle, Quack.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Agree that pig/pancake is not quite as good as mouse /cookie.  Another one hit wonder of children&#8217;s books.A fine second book is Click, Clack, Moo, which was a follow up to Giggle, Giggle, Quack.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lms</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24641</link>
		<dc:creator>lms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 01:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24641</guid>
		<description>Rather than a sharp distinction between 1st good, rest bad, I opt for Robert Jordan&#039;s Wheel of Time series slowly, irrevocably spiralling out of control, both the author&#039;s and the editor&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rather than a sharp distinction between 1st good, rest bad, I opt for Robert Jordan&#8217;s Wheel of Time series slowly, irrevocably spiralling out of control, both the author&#8217;s and the editor&#8217;s.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt McIrvin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24640</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt McIrvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2004 01:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24640</guid>
		<description>When I was little, I actually preferred &lt;cite&gt;The Cat in the Hat Comes Back&lt;/cite&gt;: there were so many conceptually odd things in it, particularly the recursive stack of Little Cats inside of the Cat&#039;s hat, with its (incomplete) implication of infinite regress and the mysterious VOOM hidden in the realm of the microscopic.And I remember wondering whether &quot;Dad&#039;s $10 shoes!!!&quot; were really all that valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When I was little, I actually preferred <cite>The Cat in the Hat Comes Back</cite>: there were so many conceptually odd things in it, particularly the recursive stack of Little Cats inside of the Cat&#8217;s hat, with its (incomplete) implication of infinite regress and the mysterious <span class="caps">VOOM</span> hidden in the realm of the microscopic.And I remember wondering whether &#8220;Dad&#8217;s $10 shoes<img src="!" alt="" border="0" />&#8221; were really all that valuable.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabakov</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24639</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabakov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24639</guid>
		<description>I have only one  word in response to this thread. And that  word is:The &quot;Uncle&quot; Books by JP Martin;Tintin and Capt Haddock;Sqn Ldr James Bigglesworth;Richard Scary&#039;s Great Big Busy Books; andJohn Blackburn mows John Wyndham&#039;s hay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have only one  word in response to this thread. And that  word is:The &#8220;Uncle&#8221; Books by <span class="caps">JP </span>Martin;Tintin and Capt Haddock;Sqn Ldr James Bigglesworth;Richard Scary&#8217;s Great Big Busy Books; andJohn Blackburn mows John Wyndham&#8217;s hay.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Luker</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24638</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Luker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24638</guid>
		<description>Anarch: The short answer to your question is &quot;NO!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anarch: The short answer to your question is &#8220;NO!&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Isbell</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24637</link>
		<dc:creator>John Isbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24637</guid>
		<description>This thread would be a long one for movies, though the Godfather II and Legally Blonde II, for instance, were both comparable to the original. My sister tells me Scooby Doo II contains a funny line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This thread would be a long one for movies, though the Godfather II and Legally Blonde II, for instance, were both comparable to the original. My sister tells me Scooby Doo II contains a funny line.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anarch</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/10/bootsie-barker/comment-page-1/#comment-24636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1381#comment-24636</guid>
		<description>Am I allowed to nominate the Old Testament?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Am I allowed to nominate the Old Testament?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 04:06:52 -->
