<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Maynard Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/22/john-maynard-smith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/22/john-maynard-smith/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:34:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/22/john-maynard-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-26003</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1450#comment-26003</guid>
		<description>Reminds me a bit of his namesake Keynes in a way.  At least he lived to old age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Reminds me a bit of his namesake Keynes in a way.  At least he lived to old age.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/22/john-maynard-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-26002</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1450#comment-26002</guid>
		<description>Maynard Smith should not be lumped in w/ vulgar socio-biologists and evolutionary psychologists like Pinker.  His work is drawn on by them, but he&#039;s much more subtle and didn&#039;t support the views they do, at least not in the same ways.  This can be seen from reading his excellent little book, _The Problems of Biology_, which I greatly recommend. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Maynard Smith should not be lumped in w/ vulgar socio-biologists and evolutionary psychologists like Pinker.  His work is drawn on by them, but he&#8217;s much more subtle and didn&#8217;t support the views they do, at least not in the same ways.  This can be seen from reading his excellent little book, <em>The Problems of Biology</em>, which I greatly recommend.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rilkefan</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/04/22/john-maynard-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-26001</link>
		<dc:creator>rilkefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 08:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=1450#comment-26001</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gould occupies a rather curious position, particularly on his side of the Atlantic. Because of the excellence of his essays, he has come to be seen by non-biologists as the pre-eminent evolutionary theorist. In contrast, the evolutionary biologists with whom I have discussed his work tend to see him as a man whose ideas are so confused as to be hardly worth bothering with, but as one who should not be publicly criticized because he is at least on our side against the creationists. All this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Isn&#039;t this blog opposed to JMS?  Or is it the commentariat?I keed, I keed.  Too bad about his passing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><blockquote>Gould occupies a rather curious position, particularly on his side of the Atlantic. Because of the excellence of his essays, he has come to be seen by non-biologists as the pre-eminent evolutionary theorist. In contrast, the evolutionary biologists with whom I have discussed his work tend to see him as a man whose ideas are so confused as to be hardly worth bothering with, but as one who should not be publicly criticized because he is at least on our side against the creationists. All this would not matter, were it not that he is giving non-biologists a largely false picture of the state of evolutionary theory.</blockquote>Isn&#8217;t this blog opposed to <span class="caps">JMS</span>?  Or is it the commentariat?I keed, I keed.  Too bad about his passing.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

