<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telling stories with pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:00:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45315</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45315</guid>
		<description>In other news, the IEM is set to open a market on when Rodney Dangerfield will die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In other news, the <span class="caps">IEM</span> is set to open a market on when Rodney Dangerfield will die.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Osner</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Osner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45314</guid>
		<description>Simstim -- a good predictor could still be better close to the event than it was further out -- that doesn&#039;t really seem to be true of the IEM for 2000 as shown in this graphic though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Simstim&#8212;a good predictor could still be better close to the event than it was further out&#8212;that doesn&#8217;t really seem to be true of the <span class="caps">IEM</span> for 2000 as shown in this graphic though.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nnyhav</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45313</link>
		<dc:creator>nnyhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45313</guid>
		<description>via Marginal Rev, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nobelpreisboerse.de/stocks.aspx?stc=6&quot;&gt;the value of a good economist&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>via Marginal Rev, <a href="http://www.nobelpreisboerse.de/stocks.aspx?stc=6">the value of a good economist</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nnyhav</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45312</link>
		<dc:creator>nnyhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45312</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410079&quot;&gt;(I)EMH and the wisdom of crowds of experts who should know better.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0410079">(I)EMH and the wisdom of crowds of experts who should know better.</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simstim</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45311</link>
		<dc:creator>Simstim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45311</guid>
		<description>But wouldn&#039;t an ideal predictor not change at all, it&#039;d be right from day one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>But wouldn&#8217;t an ideal predictor not change at all, it&#8217;d be right from day one?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45310</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 13:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45310</guid>
		<description>Robert: you are correct. Gore paid off in 2000.  I don&#039;t see the similarities, myself.  If anything that 2000 graph (which had Gore losing the popular vote in late Oct.) shows what a seriously bad predictor the IEM can be.  Perhaps that&#039;s Daniel&#039;s point?Tradesports odds are more even (54/56 ish for the popular vote contract.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Robert: you are correct. Gore paid off in 2000.  I don&#8217;t see the similarities, myself.  If anything that 2000 graph (which had Gore losing the popular vote in late Oct.) shows what a seriously bad predictor the <span class="caps">IEM</span> can be.  Perhaps that&#8217;s Daniel&#8217;s point?Tradesports odds are more even (54/56 ish for the popular vote contract.)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45309</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 23:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45309</guid>
		<description>Seems plausible that share value would get more extreme as the time till the election shrinks and the prevailing polls are therefore thought to be better predictors, subject to perhaps one major reversal of opinion.  But you&#039;d think traders would gain a better grasp of that dynamic more quickly -- ie, that the values would be largely flat at 50 just about until election eve.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Seems plausible that share value would get more extreme as the time till the election shrinks and the prevailing polls are therefore thought to be better predictors, subject to perhaps one major reversal of opinion.  But you&#8217;d think traders would gain a better grasp of that dynamic more quickly&#8212;ie, that the values would be largely flat at 50 just about until election eve.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45308</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 23:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45308</guid>
		<description>It looks like the contracts pay off on the popular vote, not the electoral college.  So did the Gore contracts pay off in 2000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It looks like the contracts pay off on the popular vote, not the electoral college.  So did the Gore contracts pay off in 2000?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny Easwaran</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/10/05/telling-stories-with-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-45307</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny Easwaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 22:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2308#comment-45307</guid>
		<description>Nice to know that the roles are reversed this time.  Though I don&#039;t quite understand why Bush stock crashed so drastically on November 6 - didn&#039;t they say he had basically won by then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice to know that the roles are reversed this time.  Though I don&#8217;t quite understand why Bush stock crashed so drastically on November 6 &#8211; didn&#8217;t they say he had basically won by then?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
