<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contempt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/19/contempt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/19/contempt/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: msk08</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/19/contempt/comment-page-1/#comment-51563</link>
		<dc:creator>msk08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2553#comment-51563</guid>
		<description>He owns Google stock?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>He owns Google stock?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron Lungfish</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/19/contempt/comment-page-1/#comment-51562</link>
		<dc:creator>Iron Lungfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 20:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2553#comment-51562</guid>
		<description>The Times editorial doesn&#039;t name the corrupt mayor (Buddy Cianci) or his bribe-handling aide, either. Hell, I don&#039;t know the name of the aide, and I live in Providence. Yes, the name of the judge is more relevant to the Times&#039; complaint, but the cause of leaving it out is probably the same - parochialism and simple laziness, more than anything else. But in a national newspaper, to focus on one Rhode Island judge is hardly that important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Times editorial doesn&#8217;t name the corrupt mayor (Buddy Cianci) or his bribe-handling aide, either. Hell, I don&#8217;t know the name of the aide, and I live in Providence. Yes, the name of the judge is more relevant to the Times&#8217; complaint, but the cause of leaving it out is probably the same &#8211; parochialism and simple laziness, more than anything else. But in a national newspaper, to focus on one Rhode Island judge is hardly that important.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theophylact</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/19/contempt/comment-page-1/#comment-51565</link>
		<dc:creator>theophylact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2553#comment-51565</guid>
		<description>Mae West, in &lt;i&gt;My Little Chickadee&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mae West, in <i>My Little Chickadee</i>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad Jim</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/11/19/contempt/comment-page-1/#comment-51564</link>
		<dc:creator>bad Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2553#comment-51564</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t the Times have reporters of its own facing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14777-2004Oct7.html&quot;&gt;contempt citations&lt;/a&gt; in the matter of Novak&#039;s revealing of Joe Wilson&#039;s wife&#039;s job?The name of the Federal judge does nothing for me, though. (West coast parochialism? Go, Ninth Circuit!) Perhaps The Times left it out because nobody cares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Doesn&#8217;t the Times have reporters of its own facing <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14777-2004Oct7.html">contempt citations</a> in the matter of Novak&#8217;s revealing of Joe Wilson&#8217;s wife&#8217;s job?The name of the Federal judge does nothing for me, though. (West coast parochialism? Go, Ninth Circuit!) Perhaps The Times left it out because nobody cares.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

