<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Voting error in the 2004 elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2004/12/11/voting-error-in-the-2004-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/12/11/voting-error-in-the-2004-elections/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:52:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/12/11/voting-error-in-the-2004-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-53883</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2633#comment-53883</guid>
		<description>isn&#039;t it sort of important to mention that they are calculating error rates using the 2000 MIT/CalTech numbers associated with the various voting techniques (&quot;If we assume that the same machines had the same error rates in 2004 as they did in 2000...&quot;)? It seems to me that 4 years is a long time technologically speaking... I agree it seems like a great way to keep students involved, but I guess I will provide feedback to them that although they have carefully described the assumptions made in their methodology, these numbers may be mistreated as more fact than guesstimate as the data gets picked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>isn&#8217;t it sort of important to mention that they are calculating error rates using the 2000 <span class="caps">MIT</span>/CalTech numbers associated with the various voting techniques (&#8220;If we assume that the same machines had the same error rates in 2004 as they did in 2000&#8230;&#8221;)? It seems to me that 4 years is a long time technologically speaking&#8230; I agree it seems like a great way to keep students involved, but I guess I will provide feedback to them that although they have carefully described the assumptions made in their methodology, these numbers may be mistreated as more fact than guesstimate as the data gets picked up.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2004/12/11/voting-error-in-the-2004-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-53882</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 01:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/wp/?p=2633#comment-53882</guid>
		<description>wow, one degree of separation, Eszter.  Philip and I met a few years ago in Chicago.  Really nice guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>wow, one degree of separation, Eszter.  Philip and I met a few years ago in Chicago.  Really nice guy.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
