<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing Favorites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 16:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Kvetch</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66840</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Kvetch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If the guy would have called Brooks back and said, “Jesus Christ” as his answer…would it have shut Brooks up?&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Now the liberals are desperately trying to jump on the faith-based bandwagon. But we know they&#039;re all atheistic moral relativists at heart, so their protestations to the contrary ring hollow.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>If the guy would have called Brooks back and said, &#8220;Jesus Christ&#8221; as his answer&#8230;would it have shut Brooks up?</i></p>

	<p>&#8220;Now the liberals are desperately trying to jump on the faith-based bandwagon. But we know they&#8217;re all atheistic moral relativists at heart, so their protestations to the contrary ring hollow.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carla</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66815</link>
		<dc:creator>carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66815</guid>
		<description>If the guy would have called Brooks back and said, &quot;Jesus Christ&quot; as his answer...would it have shut Brooks up?

If I call Brooks up and say &quot;Jesus Christ&quot;..would it shut Brooks up?

Just what will shut Brooks up, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>If the guy would have called Brooks back and said, &#8220;Jesus Christ&#8221; as his answer&#8230;would it have shut Brooks up?</p>

	<p>If I call Brooks up and say &#8220;Jesus Christ&#8221;..would it shut Brooks up?</p>

	<p>Just what will shut Brooks up, anyway?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve kyle</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66735</link>
		<dc:creator>steve kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66735</guid>
		<description>Or, as my favorite dichotomy goes - There are three kinds of economists - those who can count and those who cant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Or, as my favorite dichotomy goes &#8211; There are three kinds of economists &#8211; those who can count and those who cant.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve LaBonne</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66724</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve LaBonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66724</guid>
		<description>Of course, that&#039;s an example of why the press made him out to be some kind of unstable weirdo, as they do every candidate who doesn&#039;t confine himself to uttering the usual platitudes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Of course, that&#8217;s an example of why the press made him out to be some kind of unstable weirdo, as they do every candidate who doesn&#8217;t confine himself to uttering the usual platitudes.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad Jim</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66706</link>
		<dc:creator>bad Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 07:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66706</guid>
		<description>Thank you Hilzoy, thank you, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you Hilzoy, thank you, thank you.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hilzoy</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66697</link>
		<dc:creator>hilzoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 03:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66697</guid>
		<description>Sorry, yes: it was indeed Wes Clark who said his favorite philosopher was Hume. Yet another thing to like about him: since Clark is himself quite religious, I think we can infer from this not only that he has very good taste, but that he likes a good challenge over agreement with his views.

He briefly taught political philosophy at West Point, and I believe did PPE as a Rhodes scholar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sorry, yes: it was indeed Wes Clark who said his favorite philosopher was Hume. Yet another thing to like about him: since Clark is himself quite religious, I think we can infer from this not only that he has very good taste, but that he likes a good challenge over agreement with his views.</p>

	<p>He briefly taught political philosophy at West Point, and I believe did <span class="caps">PPE</span> as a Rhodes scholar.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Simon</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 19:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66645</guid>
		<description>My response to Brooks&#039; column is &lt;a href=&quot;http://icouldbewrong.blogspot.com/2005/04/for-some-inexplicable-reason-lots-of.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My response to Brooks&#8217; column is <a href="http://icouldbewrong.blogspot.com/2005/04/for-some-inexplicable-reason-lots-of.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viator</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66638</link>
		<dc:creator>Viator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66638</guid>
		<description>I think nolo put it best.  I can imagine two things: either the phone ringing and immediately &quot;Who is your favorite philosopher?  Eh?  WHO??&quot; or, in the style of his ridiculous debates with E.J. Dionne, veering completely off topic when they were discussing the Red Sox or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think nolo put it best.  I can imagine two things: either the phone ringing and immediately &#8220;Who is your favorite philosopher?  Eh?  <span class="caps">WHO</span>??&#8221; or, in the style of his ridiculous debates with E.J. Dionne, veering completely off topic when they were discussing the Red Sox or something.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66635</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66635</guid>
		<description>Even if he chose Hume, you cannot prove that his choice caused Brooks to call the think-tanker an elitist, pointy-headed America-hater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Even if he chose Hume, you cannot prove that his choice caused Brooks to call the think-tanker an elitist, pointy-headed America-hater.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john b</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66611</link>
		<dc:creator>john b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 15:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66611</guid>
		<description>Wes Clark, innit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wes Clark, innit?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J.Colucci</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66606</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J.Colucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66606</guid>
		<description>Please, who was it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Please, who was it?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rea</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66595</link>
		<dc:creator>rea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66595</guid>
		<description>&quot;You all do know that one candidate for President in 2004, when asked who his favorite philosopher was, actually answered ‘David Hume’, right?&quot;

Didn&#039;t win, you&#039;ll notice . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;You all do know that one candidate for President in 2004, when asked who his favorite philosopher was, actually answered &#8216;David Hume&#8217;, right?&#8221;</p>

	<p>Didn&#8217;t win, you&#8217;ll notice . . .</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve LaBonne</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66589</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve LaBonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66589</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary numbers, those who don’t, and those who wait for the punchline.&lt;/em&gt;

Um, that&#039;s &lt;em&gt;11&lt;/em&gt; kinds of people. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary numbers, those who don&#8217;t, and those who wait for the punchline.</em></p>

	<p>Um, that&#8217;s <em>11</em> kinds of people. ;)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad Jim</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66579</link>
		<dc:creator>bad Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66579</guid>
		<description>There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary numbers, those who don&#039;t, and those who wait for the punchline.

There are 10 kinds of people...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary numbers, those who don&#8217;t, and those who wait for the punchline.</p>

	<p>There are 10 kinds of people&#8230;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Boucher</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/comment-page-1/#comment-66576</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Boucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/05/playing-favorites/#comment-66576</guid>
		<description>&quot;Remember, there are 10 kinds of people- those who understand binary numbers and those who don’t.&quot;

I prefer:

There are 2 kinds of people - those who understand binary numbers and those who don&#039;t.

OR

There are 3 kinds of people - those who understand binary numbers and those who don&#039;t.

The &quot;10&quot; confuses the joke for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Remember, there are 10 kinds of people- those who understand binary numbers and those who don&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>

	<p>I prefer:</p>

	<p>There are 2 kinds of people &#8211; those who understand binary numbers and those who don&#8217;t.</p>

	<p>OR</p>

	<p>There are 3 kinds of people &#8211; those who understand binary numbers and those who don&#8217;t.</p>

	<p>The &#8220;10&#8221; confuses the joke for me.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

