<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irrational Weighting of Probabilities: A Data Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivian</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/comment-page-1/#comment-68524</link>
		<dc:creator>vivian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/#comment-68524</guid>
		<description>We love you, whether or not you&#039;re embarassed, and hope for the best. 

It&#039;s not the probability, it&#039;s the expected value that has you worried. There is some disutility associated with uncertainty between harmless options A and B, but a massively nonlinear weighting term (negative) multiplies the vanishingly small C probability. It would be really disturbing if you weren&#039;t worried. Though of course people who know you doubtless wish that you could be spared the pain of worrying, that doesn&#039;t mean anyone thinks you&#039;re nuts. 

Good luck.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We love you, whether or not you&#8217;re embarassed, and hope for the best.</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s not the probability, it&#8217;s the expected value that has you worried. There is some disutility associated with uncertainty between harmless options A and B, but a massively nonlinear weighting term (negative) multiplies the vanishingly small C probability. It would be really disturbing if you weren&#8217;t worried. Though of course people who know you doubtless wish that you could be spared the pain of worrying, that doesn&#8217;t mean anyone thinks you&#8217;re nuts.</p>

	<p>Good luck.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran Healy</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/comment-page-1/#comment-68517</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran Healy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/#comment-68517</guid>
		<description>Thanks all. But now I feel a bit embarrassed, given that nothing at all is actually wrong at this point, so far as we know, and the overwhelming likelihood is that there&#039;s nothing to worry about in the future, either. So I should just count my blessings and be quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks all. But now I feel a bit embarrassed, given that nothing at all is actually wrong at this point, so far as we know, and the overwhelming likelihood is that there&#8217;s nothing to worry about in the future, either. So I should just count my blessings and be quiet.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom T.</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/comment-page-1/#comment-68513</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/#comment-68513</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to hear this.  Best wishes to you and your child, and here&#039;s hoping that it&#039;s harmless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m sorry to hear this.  Best wishes to you and your child, and here&#8217;s hoping that it&#8217;s harmless.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/comment-page-1/#comment-68508</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/#comment-68508</guid>
		<description>Yeah - what ogged said.

Plus, if you assign a sufficiently negative utility to C, it doesn&#039;t matter how low the probability is.  The expectation still sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yeah &#8211; what ogged said.</p>

	<p>Plus, if you assign a sufficiently negative utility to C, it doesn&#8217;t matter how low the probability is.  The expectation still sucks.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogged</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/comment-page-1/#comment-68505</link>
		<dc:creator>ogged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/#comment-68505</guid>
		<description>Of course it&#039;s upsetting.  Here&#039;s to A or B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Of course it&#8217;s upsetting.  Here&#8217;s to A or B.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian holsclaw</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/comment-page-1/#comment-68500</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian holsclaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/04/19/irrational-weighting-of-probabilities-a-data-point/#comment-68500</guid>
		<description>Ah, but you are human which is to say irrational.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, but you are human which is to say irrational.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

