Comments on: Blogging innovations

By: ric

ric — Mon, 23 May 2005 01:15:15 +0000

not buggy, just code stolen from the Apple site.

http://www.apple.com/switch

By: dglp

dglp — Sun, 22 May 2005 10:56:59 +0000

I’m still convinced it’s the real deal. No spoof project would ever use such obfuscatory language – so many words that lend so little clarity to the concept. Problem is, the website programming is buggy: the ‘How to Buy’ link is non-functional.

By: bob

bob — Fri, 20 May 2005 19:41:48 +0000

Gee, I was hoping it would be real. Wordwooze at last!

By: Factory

Factory — Fri, 20 May 2005 13:54:40 +0000

From the site:
“While the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled (N Gaiman v. H Kornfeld) that use..”

Yo’, da homies representin’ at da su-premes. We rolled up, dropped da science, an’ ya’ll wuz fallin’ like suckas. Word is bond. H-Dog out.

By: Chris Martin

Chris Martin — Fri, 20 May 2005 13:36:41 +0000

They refer to Sully as a Tin-Can-rattling Millionaire Panhandler. Priceless.

By: Doug

Doug — Fri, 20 May 2005 13:00:49 +0000

I didn't write this comment.

By: Brian

Brian — Fri, 20 May 2005 11:24:03 +0000

Funny, I was sure it was a joke until I saw the list of “current users”. Then it took on the status of a plausible explanatory hypothesis.

By: Jonathan Dresner

Jonathan Dresner — Fri, 20 May 2005 08:49:19 +0000

Well, when the best-selling word processing software comes with “auto-summarize” and other text generators, when reporters write their stories before the event, when paper mills and wikipedia make up an increasing portion of my grading material…. why not?

Honestly, I wasn’t sure he was kidding until I saw the list of “current users”….

By: agm

agm — Fri, 20 May 2005 07:14:00 +0000

Nice imitation of the Apple website.