Comments on: State robbery

By: Reality-based liberal

Reality-based liberal — Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:27:57 +0000

The money isn’t being stolen. Stealing is when a private entity takes something without asking. When a government does it, it’s taxation. Applying the same standard of morality to the acts of governments as one would apply to the acts of private entities is faith-based libertarian idiocy.

By: fjm

fjm — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 21:36:51 +0000

Except that the Sri Lankan government might have a point about not wanting to distort the market. Aid can destroy an economy: relief workers in some African countries are starting to reject donated clothing because its impact on the local clothing manufacturies are so severe.

By: Otto

Otto — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:21:16 +0000

“Around a million dollars donated in the wake of the Tsunami is being stolen by the government of Sri Lanka , reports the BBC”

Why is anyone surprised by this?

By: jet

jet — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:16:44 +0000

Oxfam should play hardball and inform the government that aid will not be forthcoming while it is being taxed. Aid relief, corruption, and desperate third world disasters, damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

By: albert

albert — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 18:13:49 +0000

Shame on me, but…

Tim- There’s no government spending going on here. Yes, shame on the Sri Lankan government for this, but shame on you for lazy liberalism and trollism.

By: Matt

Matt — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:19:38 +0000

While this seems like a bad particular instance, I don’t think that this policy, in general, is clearly objectionable. I’d be shocked if there were not lots of people attempting to bring in goods for “tsunami relief” that will either immediately or very soon be sold on the normal market. It seems reasonable to reimpose a tarrif, of one has them at all, once the most immediate danger is over. I think it’s quite doubtful that Oxfam is going to re-sell these vehicles for a profit afterwards, so this particular case does seem bad, but the policy in general of putting the tariff back in place at this point and granting particular exceptions doesn’t seem bad. It also seems a bit much to say that the government is stealing this money if it’s going into a general fund. It may be a bad policy, but it doesn’t seem to be stealing. I suspect what’s happening is that to get the “exception” one must bribe the right people and Oxfam didn’t do that. This is a problem w/ exceptions.

By: Tim Worstall

Tim Worstall — Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:13:13 +0000

But, but, I thought it was generally accepted that governments know how to spend money better than private sector actors?