<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lego triumph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marek</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/comment-page-1/#comment-92316</link>
		<dc:creator>marek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 23:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/#comment-92316</guid>
		<description>And this seems to be the perfect place to raise the question of why it might be that in US English, &#039;lego&#039; is a singular noun which therefore takes the plural &#039;legos&#039;, whereas in British English &#039;lego&#039; is a collective noun for all lego components and the &#039;legos&#039; form is never used.

Empirically I have no doubt that the difference exists - in my experience the usage is completely consistent among speakers of each of those dialects, but I would be fascinated to know if anyone could explain why the difference should have arisen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And this seems to be the perfect place to raise the question of why it might be that in <span class="caps">US </span>English, &#8216;lego&#8217; is a singular noun which therefore takes the plural &#8216;legos&#8217;, whereas in British English &#8216;lego&#8217; is a collective noun for all lego components and the &#8216;legos&#8217; form is never used.</p>

	<p>Empirically I have no doubt that the difference exists &#8211; in my experience the usage is completely consistent among speakers of each of those dialects, but I would be fascinated to know if anyone could explain why the difference should have arisen.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delicious pundit</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/comment-page-1/#comment-91281</link>
		<dc:creator>Delicious pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/#comment-91281</guid>
		<description>Fans of the base ball will enjoy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bat-girl.com/archives/000386.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Batgirl&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; occasional Legovision recreations.  

I love Batgirl.  It is the answer to the question, &quot;What if a funny novelist were to give some random team the gift of her attention?&quot;  Consequently the members of the Minnesota Twins not only play their season, but have fictionalized counterparts who arrive at the exact same result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Fans of the base ball will enjoy <a href="http://www.bat-girl.com/archives/000386.php" rel="nofollow">Batgirl&#8217;s</a> occasional Legovision recreations.</p>

	<p>I love Batgirl.  It is the answer to the question, &#8220;What if a funny novelist were to give some random team the gift of her attention?&#8221;  Consequently the members of the Minnesota Twins not only play their season, but have fictionalized counterparts who arrive at the exact same result.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P ONeill</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/comment-page-1/#comment-91262</link>
		<dc:creator>P ONeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/#comment-91262</guid>
		<description>A touching modification would depict Michael Owen watching the scene on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A touching modification would depict Michael Owen watching the scene on TV.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brooke</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/comment-page-1/#comment-91203</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/#comment-91203</guid>
		<description>Rousseauists will be happy that the chap who does the Brick Testament is working through the book of Judges at the moment, which means that the story of the Levite of Ephraim will presumably soon be illustrated in Lego.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Rousseauists will be happy that the chap who does the Brick Testament is working through the book of Judges at the moment, which means that the story of the Levite of Ephraim will presumably soon be illustrated in Lego.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnhayter</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/comment-page-1/#comment-91196</link>
		<dc:creator>johnhayter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 13:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/#comment-91196</guid>
		<description>And don&#039;t forget &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thebricktestament.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Brick Testament.&lt;/a&gt;

I&#039;d say the second Ashes Test was the greatest (so far) sporting moment of the &lt;em&gt;millennium.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And don&#8217;t forget <a href="http://www.thebricktestament.com" rel="nofollow">The Brick Testament.</a></p>

	<p>I&#8217;d say the second Ashes Test was the greatest (so far) sporting moment of the <em>millennium.</em></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eszter</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/comment-page-1/#comment-91190</link>
		<dc:creator>Eszter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/18/lego-triumph/#comment-91190</guid>
		<description>I was just browsing some &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/tags/brickfest/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pictures&lt;/a&gt; from Brickfest 2005 when I saw your post.  There are also some &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/robotparade/28229659/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interesting&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://flickr.com/photos/eggrollboy/16594953/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;creations&lt;/a&gt; elsewhere.

I had a Lego-related &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.esztersblog.com/?p=161&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on my blog the other day regarding a curious incident in a Lego store recently.

I realize the focus of your post may have been on the triumph, but I was excited about the Lego part more, obviously.:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was just browsing some <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/tags/brickfest/" rel="nofollow">pictures</a> from Brickfest 2005 when I saw your post.  There are also some <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/robotparade/28229659/" rel="nofollow">interesting</a> <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/eggrollboy/16594953/" rel="nofollow">creations</a> elsewhere.</p>

	<p>I had a Lego-related <a href="http://www.esztersblog.com/?p=161" rel="nofollow">post</a> on my blog the other day regarding a curious incident in a Lego store recently.</p>

	<p>I realize the focus of your post may have been on the triumph, but I was excited about the Lego part more, obviously.:-)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 03:46:08 -->
