<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Childbirth Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 18:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: derivative work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; non-katrina</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-2/#comment-95048</link>
		<dc:creator>derivative work &#187; Blog Archive &#187; non-katrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-95048</guid>
		<description>[...] the NYT recently published a sublimely arrogant, sexist, and stupid editorial / piece by Keith Ablow. Ablow suggested that women should think twice before letting their husbands watch childbirth, since it might destroy the man&#8217;s sexual attraction to his female partner. a number of commentators have given that article the trashing it deserved. see belle waring 8/31, for example; see also belle waring 8/23; pandagon; slate; crooked timber on women&#8217;s culture (and by negative implication what men&#8217;s culture is failing to do). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] the <span class="caps">NYT</span> recently published a sublimely arrogant, sexist, and stupid editorial / piece by Keith Ablow. Ablow suggested that women should think twice before letting their husbands watch childbirth, since it might destroy the man&#8217;s sexual attraction to his female partner. a number of commentators have given that article the trashing it deserved. see belle waring 8/31, for example; see also belle waring 8/23; pandagon; slate; crooked timber on women&#8217;s culture (and by negative implication what men&#8217;s culture is failing to do). [...]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinese Adventure Blog &#187; Yes, I&#8217;m a Deviant!</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-94340</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinese Adventure Blog &#187; Yes, I&#8217;m a Deviant!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-94340</guid>
		<description>[...] the bloggersmany of whom are usually temperatewere outraged. &#8220;Would it hurt if I call you a big pussy?&#8221; one woman queried, adding, &#8220;Luckily for me, I didn&#8217;t marry a total a**hole, so I didn&#8217;t have this problem.&#8221; According to one post, a husband who finds his libido gone in the wake of the delivery room merits the same scorn we&#8217;d direct at a man who leaves a woman after finding out that she has a black grandparent. . . [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] the bloggersmany of whom are usually temperatewere outraged. &#8220;Would it hurt if I call you a big pussy?&#8221; one woman queried, adding, &#8220;Luckily for me, I didn&#8217;t marry a total a**hole, so I didn&#8217;t have this problem.&#8221; According to one post, a husband who finds his libido gone in the wake of the delivery room merits the same scorn we&#8217;d direct at a man who leaves a woman after finding out that she has a black grandparent. . . [...]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92761</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92761</guid>
		<description>For the record, Belle pre-empted comment 45 in her original post.  There&#039;s a hell of a lot of insecurity in this comment stream, but none of it&#039;s coming from Belle.  I&#039;m pretty amazed by the sheer narcissism of some comments and the turn towards personal attacks on a fellow blogger.  For this reason, I&#039;m now closing comments on this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For the record, Belle pre-empted comment 45 in her original post.  There&#8217;s a hell of a lot of insecurity in this comment stream, but none of it&#8217;s coming from Belle.  I&#8217;m pretty amazed by the sheer narcissism of some comments and the turn towards personal attacks on a fellow blogger.  For this reason, I&#8217;m now closing comments on this post.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Slack</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92753</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Slack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92753</guid>
		<description>Ah, this is still going, I see.

Quoth D-Squared: &lt;i&gt;I think the analogy’s pretty direct&lt;/i&gt;

I think the analogy is quite absurd and borderline offensive. It&#039;s like comparing someone who faints at the sight of blood to someone who suffers from Negrophobia. If you seriously think these constitute moral equivalents, you&#039;re either reading &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; too much into people&#039;s reactions to bodily fluids or you&#039;re &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; too flippant about the importance of racism. Neither reflects well on your capacity to judge who is or isn&#039;t being an &quot;asshole&quot; in this instance.

I have to agree with Dan, here. Belle&#039;s show of insecurity isn&#039;t doing her any favours in the &quot;asshole&quot; sweepstakes by comparison with her targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah, this is still going, I see.</p>

	<p>Quoth D-Squared: <i>I think the analogy&#8217;s pretty direct</i></p>

	<p>I think the analogy is quite absurd and borderline offensive. It&#8217;s like comparing someone who faints at the sight of blood to someone who suffers from Negrophobia. If you seriously think these constitute moral equivalents, you&#8217;re either reading <i>way</i> too much into people&#8217;s reactions to bodily fluids or you&#8217;re <i>way</i> too flippant about the importance of racism. Neither reflects well on your capacity to judge who is or isn&#8217;t being an &#8220;asshole&#8221; in this instance.</p>

	<p>I have to agree with Dan, here. Belle&#8217;s show of insecurity isn&#8217;t doing her any favours in the &#8220;asshole&#8221; sweepstakes by comparison with her targets.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kervick</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92749</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kervick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92749</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However, the majority of people in this situation, it seems to me, are actually just aesthetically “put off” the idea of sex with their wives after childbirth. This is more likely to be a result of cognitive beliefs and value judgements of theirs, which are the proper object of criticism.&lt;/i&gt;

Well the aesthetic response in this case actually seems to be fairly normal: instinctive revulsion toward things that &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; people, I suspect, find fairly revolting.  In any case the role of feeling, sensation and association seems more determinate in aesthetic response than cognition.

I wonder... if a woman spent several hours watching her male partner shit, piss, ooze bile, vernix and other fluids from his penis and anus; watching as his painfully stetched scrotum was cut open with a disconcerting pop; watching as a slimy, bloody living creature was pushed out of him; and then watching as the process was capped capped off by a gushing expulsion of several pints of blood along a raw, meaty placenta  - and she watched all this from a distance of two or three feet, as her husband groaned in agony - are you telling me she would immediately experience the desire to hop on?

The fact that many couples go on to have a second child, third child or more in fairly short order tells us that most men quickly get over whatever difficulties they have with arousal in the immediate aftermath of viewing childbirth.  But give the guys a break.  It takes a while for certain mental images to go away, and it seems to me that &lt;i&gt;most&lt;/i&gt; people are not particularly attracted to shit and blood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>However, the majority of people in this situation, it seems to me, are actually just aesthetically &#8220;put off&#8221; the idea of sex with their wives after childbirth. This is more likely to be a result of cognitive beliefs and value judgements of theirs, which are the proper object of criticism.</i></p>

	<p>Well the aesthetic response in this case actually seems to be fairly normal: instinctive revulsion toward things that <i>most</i> people, I suspect, find fairly revolting.  In any case the role of feeling, sensation and association seems more determinate in aesthetic response than cognition.</p>

	<p>I wonder&#8230; if a woman spent several hours watching her male partner shit, piss, ooze bile, vernix and other fluids from his penis and anus; watching as his painfully stetched scrotum was cut open with a disconcerting pop; watching as a slimy, bloody living creature was pushed out of him; and then watching as the process was capped capped off by a gushing expulsion of several pints of blood along a raw, meaty placenta  &#8211; and she watched all this from a distance of two or three feet, as her husband groaned in agony &#8211; are you telling me she would immediately experience the desire to hop on?</p>

	<p>The fact that many couples go on to have a second child, third child or more in fairly short order tells us that most men quickly get over whatever difficulties they have with arousal in the immediate aftermath of viewing childbirth.  But give the guys a break.  It takes a while for certain mental images to go away, and it seems to me that <i>most</i> people are not particularly attracted to shit and blood.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slocum</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92748</link>
		<dc:creator>Slocum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92748</guid>
		<description>Well, both of my wife&#039;s deliveries were &quot;easy&quot; ones--with the second, she gave birth after being in the hospital only about half an hour.  Both times were were back home later the same day with the kid sitting on the sofa watching football on TV and eating take-out Chinese food (it became a mini-ritual).  

But even straightforward deliveries are, well...it&#039;s a violent process and babies come out slimy and smelly.  Witnessing it all didn&#039;t put me off sex, but I can understand how it might have that effect on some.  Blaming these guys for feelings over which they have no control seems ridiculous.  When did sneering at people who experience psychological problems because they won&#039;t shut up and stop whining become acceptable in progressive circles?  I mean, I know they&#039;re men and all and, therefore, inherently less deserving of sympathy.  But even so -- sheesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, both of my wife&#8217;s deliveries were &#8220;easy&#8221; ones&#8212;with the second, she gave birth after being in the hospital only about half an hour.  Both times were were back home later the same day with the kid sitting on the sofa watching football on TV and eating take-out Chinese food (it became a mini-ritual).</p>

	<p>But even straightforward deliveries are, well&#8230;it&#8217;s a violent process and babies come out slimy and smelly.  Witnessing it all didn&#8217;t put me off sex, but I can understand how it might have that effect on some.  Blaming these guys for feelings over which they have no control seems ridiculous.  When did sneering at people who experience psychological problems because they won&#8217;t shut up and stop whining become acceptable in progressive circles?  I mean, I know they&#8217;re men and all and, therefore, inherently less deserving of sympathy.  But even so&#8212;sheesh.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Cornell</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92740</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92740</guid>
		<description>And by the way, it&#039;s not too much to ask that he be there during the delivery, holding hands, etc. But I also think it&#039;s reasonable for the guy to say, to put it crudely: &quot;I don&#039;t want to look at anything&#039;s that going on below the waist.&quot; You, for some reason, seem to think that anyone who says this is, as you put it earlier, an asshole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And by the way, it&#8217;s not too much to ask that he be there during the delivery, holding hands, etc. But I also think it&#8217;s reasonable for the guy to say, to put it crudely: &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to look at anything&#8217;s that going on below the waist.&#8221; You, for some reason, seem to think that anyone who says this is, as you put it earlier, an asshole.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kervick</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92739</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kervick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92739</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Without presuming to speak for Belle, is it your notion that she gives a monkey’s what kind of arousal responses “men” in general have? Speaking for myself, I’m pretty sure I’d settle for them just shutting up about it.&lt;/i&gt;

Of course she cares - that&#039;s what her entire essay is about.  She is clearly threatened by the revelation that some men might find their mates less attractive sexually, after those mates give birth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Without presuming to speak for Belle, is it your notion that she gives a monkey&#8217;s what kind of arousal responses &#8220;men&#8221; in general have? Speaking for myself, I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;d settle for them just shutting up about it.</i></p>

	<p>Of course she cares &#8211; that&#8217;s what her entire essay is about.  She is clearly threatened by the revelation that some men might find their mates less attractive sexually, after those mates give birth.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Cornell</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92738</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92738</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why is it incomparably worse to be turned off by race than by witnessing childbirth?&quot; I don&#039;t know. Why is it incomparably worse to be turned off by having sex with adults (that is, to be turned on by having sex with children) than to be turned off by having sex with an incredibly fat person? I just believe that it is. Racism, to me, is morally outside the pale. Being turned off by a physical reality that directly involves the sexual organs isn&#039;t. 

I&#039;m baffled here, Belle. Are you not more attracted sexually to certain kinds of people than others? Does that attraction have nothing to do with visual/physical stimuli? Why is it okay for your libido to be shaped and determined by certain visual stimuli but completely unacceptable for the libidos of these men to be so shaped?

What I don&#039;t understand is why you think &quot;fault&quot; has anything to do with this. There are lots of people whose looks/smell/movement, etc., I&#039;m simply not attracted to, just as there are lots (far too many, in fact) of people who are not attracted to me. It&#039;s not their fault that I&#039;m not attracted to them (or vice versa). But it is nonetheless true that I&#039;m not attracted to them, and that telling me to &quot;suck it up&quot; isn&#039;t going to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Why is it incomparably worse to be turned off by race than by witnessing childbirth?&#8221; I don&#8217;t know. Why is it incomparably worse to be turned off by having sex with adults (that is, to be turned on by having sex with children) than to be turned off by having sex with an incredibly fat person? I just believe that it is. Racism, to me, is morally outside the pale. Being turned off by a physical reality that directly involves the sexual organs isn&#8217;t.</p>

	<p>I&#8217;m baffled here, Belle. Are you not more attracted sexually to certain kinds of people than others? Does that attraction have nothing to do with visual/physical stimuli? Why is it okay for your libido to be shaped and determined by certain visual stimuli but completely unacceptable for the libidos of these men to be so shaped?</p>

	<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is why you think &#8220;fault&#8221; has anything to do with this. There are lots of people whose looks/smell/movement, etc., I&#8217;m simply not attracted to, just as there are lots (far too many, in fact) of people who are not attracted to me. It&#8217;s not their fault that I&#8217;m not attracted to them (or vice versa). But it is nonetheless true that I&#8217;m not attracted to them, and that telling me to &#8220;suck it up&#8221; isn&#8217;t going to help.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belle Waring</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92733</link>
		<dc:creator>Belle Waring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92733</guid>
		<description>why is it &lt;i&gt;incomparably&lt;/i&gt; worse to be turned off by race than by witnessing childbirth? is it &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; the fault of the woman that she is pregnant than it is the fault of the mixed-race woman that she is mixed-race? or is it --perhaps-- less the fault of the latter mixed race person, in that she had no control over her own conception, while the woman giving birth has --ex hypothesi--consented to conception? perhaps it is equally the fault of the &quot;disgusted&quot; father that the woman in question is giving birth? look, no one says he has to be down there between the legs taking pictures. is it too much to ask that he be willing to be there during delivery and hold his partner&#039;s hand, if that is what she wants? without the invidious suggestion that he will never fuck her again because she has a gross vagina? also, kiss my grits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>why is it <i>incomparably</i> worse to be turned off by race than by witnessing childbirth? is it <i>more</i> the fault of the woman that she is pregnant than it is the fault of the mixed-race woman that she is mixed-race? or is it&#8212;perhaps&#8212;less the fault of the latter mixed race person, in that she had no control over her own conception, while the woman giving birth has&#8212;ex hypothesi&#8212;consented to conception? perhaps it is equally the fault of the &#8220;disgusted&#8221; father that the woman in question is giving birth? look, no one says he has to be down there between the legs taking pictures. is it too much to ask that he be willing to be there during delivery and hold his partner&#8217;s hand, if that is what she wants? without the invidious suggestion that he will never fuck her again because she has a gross vagina? also, kiss my grits.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92730</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92730</guid>
		<description>Heh, the women I&#039;ve dated have come in 2 basic groups (for the purposes of this conversation): the I-will-never-get-pregnant and the you-are-never-going-to-be-in-the-birthing-room.

Squeemishness isn&#039;t a vice exclusively held by those who pee standing up. Personally, I think we should mock those who are afraid of childbirth. I this is similar to a fear some younger men have about sex: you stick a perfectly good hard-on in &lt;em&gt;there&lt;/em&gt; and out comes a limp dripping weiner. Sort of &lt;em&gt;vagina dentata&lt;/em&gt; all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Heh, the women I&#8217;ve dated have come in 2 basic groups (for the purposes of this conversation): the I-will-never-get-pregnant and the you-are-never-going-to-be-in-the-birthing-room.</p>

	<p>Squeemishness isn&#8217;t a vice exclusively held by those who pee standing up. Personally, I think we should mock those who are afraid of childbirth. I this is similar to a fear some younger men have about sex: you stick a perfectly good hard-on in <em>there</em> and out comes a limp dripping weiner. Sort of <em>vagina dentata</em> all over again.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Cornell</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92726</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92726</guid>
		<description>I agree that the analogy is direct, and that seems like the right way of putting it: you think the cognitive beliefs and values that drive these men&#039;s libidos are screwed up and worthy of attack. That is, their libidos are, in some sense, morally reprehensible (in the way, presumably, those of pedophiles are).

I think you&#039;re absolutely wrong, and that it is incomparably worse to be sexually turned-off by race than by witnessing childbirth. But I think you&#039;re right to frame the critique the way you do, as a matter of objective values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree that the analogy is direct, and that seems like the right way of putting it: you think the cognitive beliefs and values that drive these men&#8217;s libidos are screwed up and worthy of attack. That is, their libidos are, in some sense, morally reprehensible (in the way, presumably, those of pedophiles are).</p>

	<p>I think you&#8217;re absolutely wrong, and that it is incomparably worse to be sexually turned-off by race than by witnessing childbirth. But I think you&#8217;re right to frame the critique the way you do, as a matter of objective values.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92721</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 16:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92721</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My sisters are older than I am, they had their babies in the 1970s and ‘80s, and at the time there was no thought that their husbands should be present at the delivery. Heck, had it occurred to them to ask to be present, they most likely would have been refused.&lt;/i&gt;

I was born in 1970, my brother in 1975, and our father was present for both our births. It might not have been a common phenomenon yet at that point, but it wasn&#039;t unheard of, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>My sisters are older than I am, they had their babies in the 1970s and &#8216;80s, and at the time there was no thought that their husbands should be present at the delivery. Heck, had it occurred to them to ask to be present, they most likely would have been refused.</i></p>

	<p>I was born in 1970, my brother in 1975, and our father was present for both our births. It might not have been a common phenomenon yet at that point, but it wasn&#8217;t unheard of, either.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsquared</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92716</link>
		<dc:creator>dsquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92716</guid>
		<description>(to expand on the above, it is appropriate to describe people in this situation as, say, cowardly or unmanly or whatever, precisely because it is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; appropriate to have a presumption that they are speaking in good faith.  There might be some small proportion of them who have a genuine physical or mental illness which means that if they ever see a bloody vagina, they are forever cursed with impotence, and these people deserve sympathy.  However, the majority of people in this situation, it seems to me, are actually just &lt;i&gt;aesthetically&lt;/i&gt; &quot;put off&quot; the idea of sex with their wives after childbirth.  This is more likely to be a result of cognitive beliefs and value judgements of theirs, which are the proper object of criticism.  

By way of analogy, let&#039;s say that while carrying out genealogical research, Fred discovers that his wife Betty had a black grandparent, and finds that he can no longer bring himself to have sex with her now that he knows she is not the English rose of his dreams.  Tough luck on poor old Fred, but also what a racist bastard.  I think the analogy&#039;s pretty direct).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>(to expand on the above, it is appropriate to describe people in this situation as, say, cowardly or unmanly or whatever, precisely because it is <i>not</i> appropriate to have a presumption that they are speaking in good faith.  There might be some small proportion of them who have a genuine physical or mental illness which means that if they ever see a bloody vagina, they are forever cursed with impotence, and these people deserve sympathy.  However, the majority of people in this situation, it seems to me, are actually just <i>aesthetically</i> &#8220;put off&#8221; the idea of sex with their wives after childbirth.  This is more likely to be a result of cognitive beliefs and value judgements of theirs, which are the proper object of criticism.</p>

	<p>By way of analogy, let&#8217;s say that while carrying out genealogical research, Fred discovers that his wife Betty had a black grandparent, and finds that he can no longer bring himself to have sex with her now that he knows she is not the English rose of his dreams.  Tough luck on poor old Fred, but also what a racist bastard.  I think the analogy&#8217;s pretty direct).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsquared</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/08/23/childbirth-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-92714</link>
		<dc:creator>dsquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3701#comment-92714</guid>
		<description>Well don&#039;t then.  But there are evaluative descriptions which apply to this inability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well don&#8217;t then.  But there are evaluative descriptions which apply to this inability.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

