Comments on: Blogging arxiv

By: Institutional and Academic Repositories « MaisonBisson.com

Institutional and Academic Repositories « MaisonBisson.com — Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:42:44 +0000

[...] Related to this, I previously reported on arXiv.org. The intent there is slightly different, as Henry Farrell explains: [I]ts effectively replaced journal publication as the primary means for physicists to communicate with each other. Journal publication is still important — but as an imprimatur, a proof of quality, rather than a way to disseminate findings to a wider audience. [...]

By: agm

agm — Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:05:31 +0000

Um, it should be pointed out that arxiv is for SOME parts of physics but is by no means how all physicists get the word out on the street. Though it’d be awfully nice to have something less than the 8-12 month review period for JGR…

By: Library clips :: arxiv: e-print trackbacks :: August :: 2005

Library clips :: arxiv: e-print trackbacks :: August :: 2005 — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:03:00 +0000

[...] Links: Blogging arxiv arxiv.org Joins the Blogosphere! Trackbacks and the ArXivs Comments » [...]

By: Bill Gardner

Bill Gardner — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:26:51 +0000

I meant to say, “there’s less trust”, not “there’s less true”. Or maybe I meant both…

By: Bill Gardner

Bill Gardner — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:24:55 +0000

Friends, there is a fer real ~*Freudian*~ slip in the last post. I meant to say “there’s less trust” instead of “there’s less true”.

But the truth will out…

By: Bill Gardner

Bill Gardner — Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:22:46 +0000

Laurent,
Many thanks for the links. I had heard about the Public Library of Science (PLOS) project, but hadn’t seen the actual journals. There is also the BMC (BioMedCentral) project from the NIH, which has been extremely successful (I published an article in their psychiatry journal, and the experience was great).

BMC and PLOS are different than the arXiv system, because they are peer reviewed. I think this is good for medicine. We’re bigger, and there is much more money at stake, and there’s less true. Most of us feel that we need prior peer review as a filter; whereas I gather physicists do not.

Medicine is very well served by electronic journal publishing, with PubMed as a super-portal. Blogs are not part of the system—at least not yet. We need some fresh ideas.

By: guerby

guerby — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:34:12 +0000

Bill, PLOS and PLOS Medecine may be what you’re looking for.

Laurent

By: risa

risa — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:16:46 +0000

Thanks for the heads up about the arxiv rss! I hadn’t noticed this before. To me, this is way cooler than the trackbacks…

By: Bill Gardner

Bill Gardner — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:03:35 +0000

This is great…
We may need different solutions in other fields. I haven’t seen arXiv communities in clinical medicine (I’d appreciate a pointer, if anyone knows about them).

By: matt hellige

matt hellige — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:52:42 +0000

Computer science also has something like this, in the form of CiteSeer (more here). It's a valuable tool in itself, but coupled with a whole universe of mailing lists and sites like Lambda the Ultimate, where both researchers and interested laypeople (mostly professional engineers) post and discuss one another's work, a really beautiful thing happens. Having gotten used to that sense of community and open discussion, it's been pretty frustrating to pursue interests in other fields (particularly the humanities) where open document indexes and lots of online discussion don't seem to be the norm. Also, you might want to take a look at CiteULike, which is sort of like a del.icio.us for research citations.

By: Hektor Bim

Hektor Bim — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:45:34 +0000

Cool! I have to go try this out.

By: chris uggen

chris uggen — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 03:45:21 +0000

amazing. law profs and economists have made tentative movements in this direction too (e.g., showing “top 5 downloads” of the week). i could see this as part of a tenure file already. these are tall times indeed.

By: Not Even Wrong » Blog Archive » arXiv Trackbacks

Not Even Wrong » Blog Archive » arXiv Trackbacks — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 03:25:28 +0000

[...] As discussed here, here and here, the arXiv is now putting on each abstract page a link to trackbacks from weblogs which contain a link to the paper in question. This is an interesting mechanism for integrating the discussion of various papers on weblogs with the arXiv site. [...]

By: lensman

lensman — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 03:15:17 +0000

to mix it up

By: Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Arxiv trackbacks

Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Arxiv trackbacks — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:49:34 +0000

[...] Via Crooked Timber (which was via Cosmic Variance). [...]