<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picture sudoku</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:42:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Osner</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-114303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Osner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3959#comment-114303</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure that &quot;being solvable by algorithm&quot; is a requirement for a valid Sudoku puzzle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am pretty sure that &#8220;being solvable by algorithm&#8221; is a requirement for a valid Sudoku puzzle.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogmb</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-114015</link>
		<dc:creator>ogmb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 06:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3959#comment-114015</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering -- Are computer algorithms good at solving those puzzles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m wondering&#8212;Are computer algorithms good at solving those puzzles?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-113555</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3959#comment-113555</guid>
		<description>Heheh, I apologise if it&#039;s &lt;em&gt;too&lt;/em&gt; much of a time sink. ;-)

Becky (the inventor of Flickr Sudoku)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Heheh, I apologise if it&#8217;s <em>too</em> much of a time sink. ;-)</p>

	<p>Becky (the inventor of Flickr Sudoku)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-113440</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 07:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3959#comment-113440</guid>
		<description>Definitely more of a time sink than numbers! Not sure whether to say thanks or not - do bloggers need time sinks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Definitely more of a time sink than numbers! Not sure whether to say thanks or not &#8211; do bloggers need time sinks?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Reuland</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-113319</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Reuland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3959#comment-113319</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the new addiction.  I really needed that.  Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for the new addiction.  I really needed that.  Really.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Osner</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2005/10/21/picture-sudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-113246</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Osner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=3959#comment-113246</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t quite figured out yet, whether Sudoku is fun. I worked my way through about a book&#039;s worth of them a few weeks ago and I kind of get the point, but it seems like mostly I was just able to solve them or not able to -- there wasn&#039;t any middle ground where there was a real challenge. Once in a while I would hit on a new solving rule which was kind of fun when it happened -- but I can&#039;t really imagine that continuing to happen with any regularity over a long period of working the puzzles.

I was looking for there to be a kind of chess-like (or &quot;paint by numbers&quot;-like) thing on the harder puzzles, where I would make a putative entry mentally and then work ahead to try and find a contradiction; but could not seem to get it to work out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I haven&#8217;t quite figured out yet, whether Sudoku is fun. I worked my way through about a book&#8217;s worth of them a few weeks ago and I kind of get the point, but it seems like mostly I was just able to solve them or not able to&#8212;there wasn&#8217;t any middle ground where there was a real challenge. Once in a while I would hit on a new solving rule which was kind of fun when it happened&#8212;but I can&#8217;t really imagine that continuing to happen with any regularity over a long period of working the puzzles.</p>

	<p>I was looking for there to be a kind of chess-like (or &#8220;paint by numbers&#8221;-like) thing on the harder puzzles, where I would make a putative entry mentally and then work ahead to try and find a contradiction; but could not seem to get it to work out.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
