<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad hair day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tad Brennan</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-139015</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-139015</guid>
		<description>Right.  Thanks for the explanation.  From what I knew of Grayling in the mid-90&#039;s when we were colleagues in London philosophy, the charge of vanity does not strike me as especially apt.

Vanity about appearance is not among the leading vices of the profession, so far as I can tell (though other vanities, and other vices, there certainly are).  On punctiliousness in dress, most philosophers seem to share Johnson&#039;s view:

Concerning this unfortunate poet, Christopher Smart, who was confined in a mad-house, he [said]... &quot;I did not think he ought to be shut up. His infirmities were not noxious to society. He insisted on people praying with him; and I&#039;d as lief pray with Kit Smart as any one else. Another charge was, that he did not love clean linen; and I have no passion for it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Right.  Thanks for the explanation.  From what I knew of Grayling in the mid-90&#8217;s when we were colleagues in London philosophy, the charge of vanity does not strike me as especially apt.</p>

	<p>Vanity about appearance is not among the leading vices of the profession, so far as I can tell (though other vanities, and other vices, there certainly are).  On punctiliousness in dress, most philosophers seem to share Johnson&#8217;s view:</p>

	<p>Concerning this unfortunate poet, Christopher Smart, who was confined in a mad-house, he [said]&#8230; &#8220;I did not think he ought to be shut up. His infirmities were not noxious to society. He insisted on people praying with him; and I&#8217;d as lief pray with Kit Smart as any one else. Another charge was, that he did not love clean linen; and I have no passion for it.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bertram</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-139005</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bertram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-139005</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Tad, there&#039;s history here (a bit of an in-joke). See

http://tinyurl.com/den2n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sorry, Tad, there&#8217;s history here (a bit of an in-joke). See</p>

	<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/den2n" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/den2n</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Brennan</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-139003</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Brennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-139003</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get this post.  Are you taking pot-shots at Levy?  Or Grayling?  Or both?  The structural emphasis falls on Grayling, but I can&#039;t see why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I don&#8217;t get this post.  Are you taking pot-shots at Levy?  Or Grayling?  Or both?  The structural emphasis falls on Grayling, but I can&#8217;t see why.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bertram</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138999</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bertram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138999</guid>
		<description>My god! He&#039;s Gaston from Beauty and the Beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My god! He&#8217;s Gaston from Beauty and the Beast.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snuh</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138831</link>
		<dc:creator>snuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138831</guid>
		<description>http://www.nybooks.com/gallery/1931</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/gallery/1931" rel="nofollow">http://www.nybooks.com/gallery/1931</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Liu</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138684</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138684</guid>
		<description>In US academia, we try not to be good looking as it would be a form of sexual harassment with regard to both colleagues and students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>In US academia, we try not to be good looking as it would be a form of sexual harassment with regard to both colleagues and students.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otto</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138680</link>
		<dc:creator>otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138680</guid>
		<description>&quot;neither country (how different from the US) can tolerate anyone who is simultaneously too clever, too successful and too good-looking&quot;

Are there any serious candidates for all three of these criteria even in the US? 
(Present company excepted, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;neither country (how different from the US) can tolerate anyone who is simultaneously too clever, too successful and too good-looking&#8221;</p>

	<p>Are there any serious candidates for all three of these criteria even in the US?<br />
(Present company excepted, of course).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novakant</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138639</link>
		<dc:creator>novakant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138639</guid>
		<description>hmm, he&#039;s ugly (try Damasio instead)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>hmm, he&#8217;s ugly (try Damasio instead)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SqueakyRat</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138631</link>
		<dc:creator>SqueakyRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138631</guid>
		<description>I have to admit that that headline is one of the funniest things I have ever read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have to admit that that headline is one of the funniest things I have ever read.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kotsko</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138454</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kotsko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138454</guid>
		<description>His recent attempt to redo de Tocqueville in &lt;i&gt;Atlantic Monthly&lt;/i&gt; struck me as fairly uninteresting and uninsightful.  Perhaps if I&#039;d known he has impeccable hair, I would have enjoyed the articles more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>His recent attempt to redo de Tocqueville in <i>Atlantic Monthly</i> struck me as fairly uninteresting and uninsightful.  Perhaps if I&#8217;d known he has impeccable hair, I would have enjoyed the articles more.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yabonn</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138315</link>
		<dc:creator>yabonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138315</guid>
		<description>But Grayling has at least some courage to even use touch the subject of hair.

I don&#039;t really understand how BHL has ever been taken seriously. Neither his obnoxious pintade (babelfish gives me &quot;guinea fowl&quot; for this one, i hope the meaning follows). Think &quot;Johnny Hallyday&quot;, people.

Good point is that he&#039;s specially good at receiving cream pies in the face. Gloup gloup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>But Grayling has at least some courage to even use touch the subject of hair.</p>

	<p>I don&#8217;t really understand how <span class="caps">BHL</span> has ever been taken seriously. Neither his obnoxious pintade (babelfish gives me &#8220;guinea fowl&#8221; for this one, i hope the meaning follows). Think &#8220;Johnny Hallyday&#8221;, people.</p>

	<p>Good point is that he&#8217;s specially good at receiving cream pies in the face. Gloup gloup!</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave heasman</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/comment-page-1/#comment-138306</link>
		<dc:creator>dave heasman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/01/14/bad-hair-day/#comment-138306</guid>
		<description>&quot;too clever, too successful and too good-looking&quot;

 You mean like that nice Mr Trump?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;too clever, too successful and too good-looking&#8221;</p>

	<p>You mean like that nice Mr Trump?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
