<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All&#8217;s Right With the World  ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:31:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-142543</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142543</guid>
		<description>Barry, I&#039;m still waiting for Michael Fumento to turn up with his shredder for my last post. Steve can stand in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Barry, I&#8217;m still waiting for Michael Fumento to turn up with his shredder for my last post. Steve can stand in line.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bro. Bartleby</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-142520</link>
		<dc:creator>Bro. Bartleby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142520</guid>
		<description>a.,
It&#039;s a funny.
BB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>a.,<br />
It&#8217;s a funny.<br />
BB</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-142494</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142494</guid>
		<description>a., I&#039;m more familiar with people who wouldn&#039;t vote for Bush because of his supposed religiosity than with those who did vote for him for the same.  I wonder about the circles you travel in. An unusual one for a CT reader, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>a., I&#8217;m more familiar with people who wouldn&#8217;t vote for Bush because of his supposed religiosity than with those who did vote for him for the same.  I wonder about the circles you travel in. An unusual one for a CT reader, for sure.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-142448</link>
		<dc:creator>A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142448</guid>
		<description>Bartleby: Is your point that the press is against Bush?  Oddly, although the sentences you write are not anywhere to be found (because Bush doesn&#039;t go to church), if you replaced the word &quot;Bush&quot; with &quot;Clinton&quot; they are everywhere.  So can we conclude the press was against Clinton?

Thomas: The point isn&#039;t about religiosity, but about using religion to win votes.  I have met many people who vote for Bush for no reason other than &quot;he&#039;s a good Christian.&quot;  For this reason it is perfectly appropriate to ask whether evidence indicates that is true or false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bartleby: Is your point that the press is against Bush?  Oddly, although the sentences you write are not anywhere to be found (because Bush doesn&#8217;t go to church), if you replaced the word &#8220;Bush&#8221; with &#8220;Clinton&#8221; they are everywhere.  So can we conclude the press was against Clinton?</p>

	<p>Thomas: The point isn&#8217;t about religiosity, but about using religion to win votes.  I have met many people who vote for Bush for no reason other than &#8220;he&#8217;s a good Christian.&#8221;  For this reason it is perfectly appropriate to ask whether evidence indicates that is true or false.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bro. Bartleby</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-142430</link>
		<dc:creator>Bro. Bartleby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142430</guid>
		<description>Headline: President Waves to crowd after Sunday Service

Story: Not since President Washington has a president been such a common sight inside a church on Sunday mornings, leaving many to quip that perhaps President Bush will purchase the pew that up until now had the nameplate of the Washington family.

OpEd: Again, the President wears his religiousity on his lapel, week after week performing for the right-wing crowd, the perfect photo-op obviously orchestrated by Bishop Carl Rove. Unlike John Kerry, who worships in his private chapel, the President delights in showing his &#039;perfect attendance&#039; lapel button to the unchurched reporters covering what is now referred to as the Sunday ritual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Headline: President Waves to crowd after Sunday Service</p>

	<p>Story: Not since President Washington has a president been such a common sight inside a church on Sunday mornings, leaving many to quip that perhaps President Bush will purchase the pew that up until now had the nameplate of the Washington family.</p>

	<p>OpEd: Again, the President wears his religiousity on his lapel, week after week performing for the right-wing crowd, the perfect photo-op obviously orchestrated by Bishop Carl Rove. Unlike John Kerry, who worships in his private chapel, the President delights in showing his &#8216;perfect attendance&#8217; lapel button to the unchurched reporters covering what is now referred to as the Sunday ritual.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abb1</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142424</link>
		<dc:creator>abb1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142424</guid>
		<description>...&lt;i&gt;but&lt;/i&gt; few chosen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8230;<i>but</i> few chosen.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abb1</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142423</link>
		<dc:creator>abb1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142423</guid>
		<description>...many are called by few chosen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8230;many are called by few chosen.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142422</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 12:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142422</guid>
		<description>Steve, still waiting for your response, giving your feelings for Bush&#039;s not enlisting when he was 18, and securing a nice National Guard post when the draft man was about to come callin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve, still waiting for your response, giving your feelings for Bush&#8217;s not enlisting when he was 18, and securing a nice National Guard post when the draft man was about to come callin&#8217;.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abb1</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142391</link>
		<dc:creator>abb1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142391</guid>
		<description>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22miserable+failure%22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=%22miserable+failure%22" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=%22miserable+failure%22</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142387</guid>
		<description>Bush &quot;religious fanatic&quot; = about 80,000
Bush hypocrite = about 1,260,000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bush &#8220;religious fanatic&#8221; = about 80,000<br />
Bush hypocrite = about 1,260,000</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142383</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 09:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142383</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unless this president is a lot more hated by a lot more people&quot;

You would think so, but Clinton was hated pretty violently by lots of Republicans. I was always surprised by this; in policy terms he wasn&#039;t notably to the left of Bush I after all. And bin Laden was out to get him too, not surprisingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Unless this president is a lot more hated by a lot more people&#8221;</p>

	<p>You would think so, but Clinton was hated pretty violently by lots of Republicans. I was always surprised by this; in policy terms he wasn&#8217;t notably to the left of Bush I after all. And bin Laden was out to get him too, not surprisingly.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harald Korneliussen</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142380</link>
		<dc:creator>Harald Korneliussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142380</guid>
		<description>Bro. Bartleby wrote: &quot;And what are the Secret Service logistics for the President to attend a ‘normal’ church service?&quot;

Matt McGrattan wrote: &quot;The fact that previous Presidents have attended regularly suggests that’s not really an issue, eh?&quot;

Unless this president is a lot more hated by a lot more people, which seems reasonable to me. (Both the statement and the hatred, actually...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Bro. Bartleby wrote: &#8220;And what are the Secret Service logistics for the President to attend a &#8216;normal&#8217; church service?&#8221;</p>

	<p>Matt McGrattan wrote: &#8220;The fact that previous Presidents have attended regularly suggests that&#8217;s not really an issue, eh?&#8221;</p>

	<p>Unless this president is a lot more hated by a lot more people, which seems reasonable to me. (Both the statement and the hatred, actually&#8230;)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H. e. baber</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142363</link>
		<dc:creator>H. e. baber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142363</guid>
		<description>it depends on what you mean by &quot;religion&quot;--and many Americans seem to mean &quot;values&quot;=socially conservative views on &quot;lifestyle issues&quot; rather than metaphysical commitments or cultic participation.

I sometimes wonder what would happen if someone, in the experimental spirit of L. Ron Hubbard, invested a non-theistic &quot;religion&quot; that promoted socially conservative lifestyle rules (maybe promoting sex roles on secular sociobiological grounds), jingoism and capitalism and opposing sex, drugs and rock &#039;n&#039; roll without any burdensome theological dogmas or religious obligations.

I think that would be a winner--and a money=maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>it depends on what you mean by &#8220;religion&#8221;&#8212;and many Americans seem to mean &#8220;values&#8221;=socially conservative views on &#8220;lifestyle issues&#8221; rather than metaphysical commitments or cultic participation.</p>

	<p>I sometimes wonder what would happen if someone, in the experimental spirit of L. Ron Hubbard, invested a non-theistic &#8220;religion&#8221; that promoted socially conservative lifestyle rules (maybe promoting sex roles on secular sociobiological grounds), jingoism and capitalism and opposing sex, drugs and rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll without any burdensome theological dogmas or religious obligations.</p>

	<p>I think that would be a winner&#8212;and a money=maker.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142352</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142352</guid>
		<description>John, that may have more to do with my word choice than with the substance of my point.  (Try Bush + &quot;religious fanatic&quot;, or some other appropriate substitute.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John, that may have more to do with my word choice than with the substance of my point.  (Try Bush + &#8220;religious fanatic&#8221;, or some other appropriate substitute.)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yabonn</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-142341</link>
		<dc:creator>yabonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 23:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/02/01/alls-right-with-the-world/#comment-142341</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;snort, cough chablis out of one’s nose,&lt;/i&gt;

Me? Wasting wine? Ridiculous supposition.

Besides i don&#039;t do Chablis, usually.

OK, a good Laroche if i must.

But wait. You &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; it&#039;s not meant to be snorted, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>snort, cough chablis out of one&#8217;s nose,</i></p>

	<p>Me? Wasting wine? Ridiculous supposition.</p>

	<p>Besides i don&#8217;t do Chablis, usually.</p>

	<p>OK, a good Laroche if i must.</p>

	<p>But wait. You <i>know</i> it&#8217;s not meant to be snorted, right?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 08:37:24 -->
