<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hows about them efficient prediction markets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; White smoke at the _Economist_</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-148935</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; White smoke at the _Economist_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-148935</guid>
		<description>[...] So it looks as though John Micklethwait, currently US editor, is probably going to be the new editor at the Economist; the final decision is due to be announced tomorrow. It&#8217;s down to a two man race between him and Ed Carr, and not that many people are betting on Carr ( in contrast to a few days ago, but that&#8217;s a different story ). To the surprise of many, Clive Crook didn&#8217;t make it to the final two, which is unfortunate in my books &#8211; Crook is somewhat conservative for my taste, but also a good journalist who would have made a very decent editor. Ed Carr, from all I&#8217;ve heard, would be a good editor too, but things don&#8217;t sound good for him. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] So it looks as though John Micklethwait, currently US editor, is probably going to be the new editor at the Economist; the final decision is due to be announced tomorrow. It&#8217;s down to a two man race between him and Ed Carr, and not that many people are betting on Carr ( in contrast to a few days ago, but that&#8217;s a different story ). To the surprise of many, Clive Crook didn&#8217;t make it to the final two, which is unfortunate in my books &#8211; Crook is somewhat conservative for my taste, but also a good journalist who would have made a very decent editor. Ed Carr, from all I&#8217;ve heard, would be a good editor too, but things don&#8217;t sound good for him. [...]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vivian</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147695</link>
		<dc:creator>vivian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147695</guid>
		<description>Same thing happened in anticipation of Inspector Morse&#039;s first name - Colin Dexter asked (rhetorically?) whether he might place a bet. Maybe he should be the next editor of the Economist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Same thing happened in anticipation of Inspector Morse&#8217;s first name &#8211; Colin Dexter asked (rhetorically?) whether he might place a bet. Maybe he should be the next editor of the Economist.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147675</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 00:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147675</guid>
		<description>A win for Carr, now, would be a pretty good result for the smart money/efficient markets hypothesis. A loss, on the other hand, would support the Plain Punters of Ireland view since, presumably, failed manipulation of this kind counts against you. What happened in the Daily Mail case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>A win for Carr, now, would be a pretty good result for the smart money/efficient markets hypothesis. A loss, on the other hand, would support the Plain Punters of Ireland view since, presumably, failed manipulation of this kind counts against you. What happened in the Daily Mail case?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derrida derider</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147610</link>
		<dc:creator>derrida derider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147610</guid>
		<description>Yep, Seth, you&#039;re right - the maxim at the racetrack is &quot;Those who know don&#039;t say and those who say don&#039;t know&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yep, Seth, you&#8217;re right &#8211; the maxim at the racetrack is &#8220;Those who know don&#8217;t say and those who say don&#8217;t know&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147595</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 06:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147595</guid>
		<description>Henry: If someone &lt;em&gt;knew&lt;/em&gt; who was going to win, would they say so? Or would they say &quot;No, I don&#039;t really know, I just put some money on him as a bit of fun, to create some buzz, help out a mate you know.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Henry: If someone <em>knew</em> who was going to win, would they say so? Or would they say &#8220;No, I don&#8217;t really know, I just put some money on him as a bit of fun, to create some buzz, help out a mate you know.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commenterlein</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147589</link>
		<dc:creator>Commenterlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 05:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147589</guid>
		<description>Henry,
I didn&#039;t even think of this possibility, it didn&#039;t occur to me that the relevant decision makers at the Economist might care about the opinions of the Plain Punters of Ireland. Do you really think they do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Henry,<br />
I didn&#8217;t even think of this possibility, it didn&#8217;t occur to me that the relevant decision makers at the Economist might care about the opinions of the Plain Punters of Ireland. Do you really think they do?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147587</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147587</guid>
		<description>Ah but the difference here is that it isn&#039;t insider trading - as I understand the process from the FT this weekend, no-one really knows who is going to win - so much as an effort to make Carr seem like a winner b/c he has been anointed by the Plain Punters of Ireland and thus tilt the gossip (and possibly the result) in his favor. Predictive market as self-fulfilling prophecy, basically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ah but the difference here is that it isn&#8217;t insider trading &#8211; as I understand the process from the FT this weekend, no-one really knows who is going to win &#8211; so much as an effort to make Carr seem like a winner b/c he has been anointed by the Plain Punters of Ireland and thus tilt the gossip (and possibly the result) in his favor. Predictive market as self-fulfilling prophecy, basically.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147581</link>
		<dc:creator>P O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147581</guid>
		<description>The same thing happened with the betting on Time Magazine&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/12-03-2005/0004227180&amp;EDATE=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Person of the Year&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The same thing happened with the betting on Time Magazine&#8217;s <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&#038;STORY=/www/story/12-03-2005/0004227180&#038;EDATE=" rel="nofollow">Person of the Year</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commenterlein</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/03/12/hows-about-them-efficient-prediction-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-147580</link>
		<dc:creator>Commenterlein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=4420#comment-147580</guid>
		<description>I am not really sure whether I would call trading on inside information &quot;manipulation&quot;, but that&#039;s just semantics.

Someone like Justin Wolfers and other advocates of the usefulness of prediction markets cannot really be happy about this - for prediction markets to have the most power, you want insiders to trade, as long as they don&#039;t drive most of the liquidity providers (=know-nothings) out of the market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I am not really sure whether I would call trading on inside information &#8220;manipulation&#8221;, but that&#8217;s just semantics.</p>

	<p>Someone like Justin Wolfers and other advocates of the usefulness of prediction markets cannot really be happy about this &#8211; for prediction markets to have the most power, you want insiders to trade, as long as they don&#8217;t drive most of the liquidity providers (=know-nothings) out of the market.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

