<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quasi-intelligent comment spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:04:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Wimberley</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-157309</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wimberley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-157309</guid>
		<description>Evolutionary logic predicts that the first true artificial intelligence - defined as one that passes the Turing test - will be a psychopathic spambot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Evolutionary logic predicts that the first true artificial intelligence &#8211; defined as one that passes the Turing test &#8211; will be a psychopathic spambot.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Distler</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-157060</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Distler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 15:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-157060</guid>
		<description>Hand-crafted comment spam is the only kind I ever get. (Yes, I&#039;m &lt;strong&gt;quite&lt;/strong&gt; sure it&#039;s not robotic; I have my ways of telling.)

Some of the spammers are quite clever.

Some go to the lengths of setting up a fake blog (leaving that as the URL). Once they&#039;ve accumulated enough comments on other sites, they switch-out the fake blog (whose content was usually stolen from elsewhere), and replace it with the usual spammy alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hand-crafted comment spam is the only kind I ever get. (Yes, I&#8217;m <strong>quite</strong> sure it&#8217;s not robotic; I have my ways of telling.)</p>

	<p>Some of the spammers are quite clever.</p>

	<p>Some go to the lengths of setting up a fake blog (leaving that as the <span class="caps">URL</span>). Once they&#8217;ve accumulated enough comments on other sites, they switch-out the fake blog (whose content was usually stolen from elsewhere), and replace it with the usual spammy alternatives.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abb1</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-157057</link>
		<dc:creator>abb1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-157057</guid>
		<description>I fed this post to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.titane.ca/concordia/dfar251/igod/main.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;iGod&lt;/a&gt; and got this response:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
God:
Is that your final answer?    Where did  he get  it?   Perhaps.  Let&#039;s talk more about AI.   How do you assume this statement holds true for me? 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I fed this post to <a href="http://www.titane.ca/concordia/dfar251/igod/main.html" rel="nofollow">iGod</a> and got this response:<br />
<blockquote><br />
God:<br />
Is that your final answer?    Where did  he get  it?   Perhaps.  Let&#8217;s talk more about AI.   How do you assume this statement holds true for me?<br />
</blockquote></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-157050</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 13:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-157050</guid>
		<description>Some time back, Making Light posted about having your comment script automatically add a &quot;nofollow&quot; tag to the links in comments, so that Google would not notice them. That wouldn&#039;t by itself stanch the spam flow, but it would make CT not useful to spammers, which they might eventually (or quickly, given the speed of evolution) figure out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Some time back, Making Light posted about having your comment script automatically add a &#8220;nofollow&#8221; tag to the links in comments, so that Google would not notice them. That wouldn&#8217;t by itself stanch the spam flow, but it would make CT not useful to spammers, which they might eventually (or quickly, given the speed of evolution) figure out.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156987</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 06:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156987</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Have any of you seen political comment spam?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Some of the commentors at http://www.washingtonmonthly.com believe that a couple of the posters are spambots regurgitating republican talking points. &quot;Sockpuppet&quot; also comes to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><blockquote>Have any of you seen political comment spam?</blockquote><br />
Some of the commentors at <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonmonthly.com</a> believe that a couple of the posters are spambots regurgitating republican talking points. &#8220;Sockpuppet&#8221; also comes to mind.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treefroggy</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156975</link>
		<dc:creator>treefroggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 02:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156975</guid>
		<description>Semi-relevant posts ?  You&#039;re probably just getting some of the usual suspects from the Hit-and-Run blog comments section.  Most posts there devolve into semi-relevancy after about the third post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Semi-relevant posts ?  You&#8217;re probably just getting some of the usual suspects from the Hit-and-Run blog comments section.  Most posts there devolve into semi-relevancy after about the third post.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Maltz</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156973</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Maltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 01:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156973</guid>
		<description>The comment by Roger (#9) reminds me of a solution to junk (snail) mail I saw in a recent (20-30 yrs ago) issue of Village Voice. The writer had gotten postage-paid envelopes from both religious zealots and pornography purveyors -- and cross-fertilized the two by sending each the other&#039;s mailings. I think he added a bunch of other stuff, to increase the weight -- and cost -- of the mailings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The comment by Roger (#9) reminds me of a solution to junk (snail) mail I saw in a recent (20-30 yrs ago) issue of Village Voice. The writer had gotten postage-paid envelopes from both religious zealots and pornography purveyors&#8212;and cross-fertilized the two by sending each the other&#8217;s mailings. I think he added a bunch of other stuff, to increase the weight&#8212;and cost&#8212;of the mailings.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kotsko</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156969</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kotsko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 01:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156969</guid>
		<description>Do you ever get the spam that doesn&#039;t even have links or anything?  For a while, I was getting a few messages a day that just said something like &quot;Have a nice day.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Do you ever get the spam that doesn&#8217;t even have links or anything?  For a while, I was getting a few messages a day that just said something like &#8220;Have a nice day.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Edenbaum</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156962</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Edenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 00:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156962</guid>
		<description>Poetry Spam?
Sounds like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0880015330/103-2436157-5989427?v=glance&amp;n=283155&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Phil Rizzuto?&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cosmicbaseball.com/oholycow.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Holy Cow!&lt;/a&gt;

The Bridge

Two balls and a strike.
You know what they had on TV today, White?
Bridge on the River Kwai
Everybody should have gotten an Academy Award for
that movie.
I don&#039;t know how many times I&#039;ve seen it.
About forty times.
Alec Guinness!
William Holden!
Three and one the count.
I just heard somebody whistle.
You know that song?
That&#039;s what they whistle.
Nobody out.
And he pops it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Poetry Spam?<br />
Sounds like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0880015330/103-2436157-5989427?v=glance&#038;n=283155" rel="nofollow">Phil Rizzuto?</a></p>

	<p><a href="http://www.cosmicbaseball.com/oholycow.html" rel="nofollow">Holy Cow!</a></p>

	<p>The Bridge</p>

	<p>Two balls and a strike.<br />
You know what they had on TV today, White?<br />
Bridge on the River Kwai<br />
Everybody should have gotten an Academy Award for<br />
that movie.<br />
I don&#8217;t know how many times I&#8217;ve seen it.<br />
About forty times.<br />
Alec Guinness!<br />
William Holden!<br />
Three and one the count.<br />
I just heard somebody whistle.<br />
You know that song?<br />
That&#8217;s what they whistle.<br />
Nobody out.<br />
And he pops it up.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modus potus</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156960</link>
		<dc:creator>modus potus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 23:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156960</guid>
		<description>See &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_V_Shaney&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark V Shaney&lt;/a&gt; for some background on what might be happening. I was a regular reader of USENET when &quot;he&quot; was around; people would actually get into arguments with him and, at times, his posts made more sense than most of the others in a thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_V_Shaney" rel="nofollow">Mark V Shaney</a> for some background on what might be happening. I was a regular reader of <span class="caps">USENET</span> when &#8220;he&#8221; was around; people would actually get into arguments with him and, at times, his posts made more sense than most of the others in a thread.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156959</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 23:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156959</guid>
		<description>You only just started to get these?

The evolution of spam is remarkable. Me, I rather miss the primitive phase of seemingly randomly generated strings of words that were turning up a few months ago. They were just surreal. 

People who write effective anti-spam plugins should be cherished and rewarded. (I&#039;m currently using Akismet, by the way.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You only just started to get these?</p>

	<p>The evolution of spam is remarkable. Me, I rather miss the primitive phase of seemingly randomly generated strings of words that were turning up a few months ago. They were just surreal.</p>

	<p>People who write effective anti-spam plugins should be cherished and rewarded. (I&#8217;m currently using Akismet, by the way.)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sara</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156956</link>
		<dc:creator>sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 22:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156956</guid>
		<description>Have any of you seen political comment spam? I can&#039;t  link an example right now, but it seems tailored to express crude political sentiments (knee-jerk liberal, in the case of the blogs I read) and then offer a link to some alternative-medicine product site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Have any of you seen political comment spam? I can&#8217;t  link an example right now, but it seems tailored to express crude political sentiments (knee-jerk liberal, in the case of the blogs I read) and then offer a link to some alternative-medicine product site.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCinDC</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156954</link>
		<dc:creator>KCinDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156954</guid>
		<description>MPowell, lots of them do. Today I got a spam message containing a paragraph from &lt;i&gt;The Lord of the Rings&lt;/i&gt; (preceded by various creatively spelled, spaced-out drug names with links).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>MPowell, lots of them do. Today I got a spam message containing a paragraph from <i>The Lord of the Rings</i> (preceded by various creatively spelled, spaced-out drug names with links).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpowell</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156953</link>
		<dc:creator>mpowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156953</guid>
		<description>I wonder why email spammers don&#039;t include paragraphs from random texts.  It would seem to be a lot easier than trying to generate coherent text on your own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I wonder why email spammers don&#8217;t include paragraphs from random texts.  It would seem to be a lot easier than trying to generate coherent text on your own.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-156947</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/05/25/quasi-intelligent-comment-spam/#comment-156947</guid>
		<description>I recommend slagging the companies being advertised. On my blog, after being spammed by some Crofton Steelware advert, I commented on Crofton Steelware&#039;s unique discount for Al Qaeda members (15 percent off for potential suicide bombers) and its new, insecticide recycling teflon surface, great for inducing Alzheimer&#039;s and diarrhea. Etc., etc. I was happy to see that comment mount, in the Googlestakes, when Crofton Steelware was searched for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I recommend slagging the companies being advertised. On my blog, after being spammed by some Crofton Steelware advert, I commented on Crofton Steelware&#8217;s unique discount for Al Qaeda members (15 percent off for potential suicide bombers) and its new, insecticide recycling teflon surface, great for inducing Alzheimer&#8217;s and diarrhea. Etc., etc. I was happy to see that comment mount, in the Googlestakes, when Crofton Steelware was searched for.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
