<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Credibility problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: humbucker</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168754</link>
		<dc:creator>humbucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 04:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168754</guid>
		<description>Steve, if you are the best the Wrong has to offer, then I&#039;m crying tears of fuçkin&#039; joy.

Hey, how &#039;bout addressing my question about the &#039;opportunity cost&#039; of Dubya&#039;s &#039;war of choice&#039; in Iraq?  And then maybe you could contact the families of the over 2600 U.S. troops who died in this &lt;b&gt;completely unnecessary war&lt;/b&gt;, and explain to them why you&#039;re such a dumbåss schmuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve, if you are the best the Wrong has to offer, then I&#8217;m crying tears of fu&#231;kin&#8217; joy.</p>

	<p>Hey, how &#8216;bout addressing my question about the &#8216;opportunity cost&#8217; of Dubya&#8217;s &#8216;war of choice&#8217; in Iraq?  And then maybe you could contact the families of the over 2600 U.S. troops who died in this <b>completely unnecessary war</b>, and explain to them why you&#8217;re such a dumb&#229;ss schmuck.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kip</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168675</link>
		<dc:creator>Kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168675</guid>
		<description>Krauthammer has one good article on record - the one he wrote about the raucous speed chess parties at his house.  

Steve - cursing at people doesn&#039;t make one a bad thinker.  Hell, it doesn&#039;t even make you a bad theologian - look at Stanley Hauerwas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Krauthammer has one good article on record &#8211; the one he wrote about the raucous speed chess parties at his house.</p>

	<p>Steve &#8211; cursing at people doesn&#8217;t make one a bad thinker.  Hell, it doesn&#8217;t even make you a bad theologian &#8211; look at Stanley Hauerwas.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168666</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168666</guid>
		<description>“What a fucktard.”

“Charles Krauthammer appears to be an idiot who should be studying to be a moron. And, by saying that, I am being unkind to both idiots and morons.”

“immediately following the devastation of the world trade center’s twin towers (which by the way, look an awful lot like they were subject to a controlled demolition in the existing documented films of that day’s events).”

“Shut the fück up—”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;What a fucktard.&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Charles Krauthammer appears to be an idiot who should be studying to be a moron. And, by saying that, I am being unkind to both idiots and morons.&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;immediately following the devastation of the world trade center&#8217;s twin towers (which by the way, look an awful lot like they were subject to a controlled demolition in the existing documented films of that day&#8217;s events).&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Shut the f&#252;ck up&#8212;&#8221;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bi</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168660</link>
		<dc:creator>bi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168660</guid>
		<description>Steve: [lots of nonsensical arguments]

Other people: Shut up, Steve.

Steve: Argh! Look, the Left(tm) is telling me to shut up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve: [lots of nonsensical arguments]</p>

	<p>Other people: Shut up, Steve.</p>

	<p>Steve: Argh! Look, the Left&#8482; is telling me to shut up!</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168624</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168624</guid>
		<description>&quot;What a fucktard.&quot;

&quot;Charles Krauthammer appears to be an idiot who should be studying to be a moron. And, by saying that, I am being unkind to both idiots and morons.&quot;

&quot;immediately following the devastation of the world trade center’s twin towers (which by the way, look an awful lot like they were subject to a controlled demolition in the existing documented films of that day’s events).&quot; 

&quot;Shut the fück up—&quot;

What&#039;s sad is that you really are the best the Left has to offer...

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;What a fucktard.&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Charles Krauthammer appears to be an idiot who should be studying to be a moron. And, by saying that, I am being unkind to both idiots and morons.&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;immediately following the devastation of the world trade center&#8217;s twin towers (which by the way, look an awful lot like they were subject to a controlled demolition in the existing documented films of that day&#8217;s events).&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Shut the f&#252;ck up&#8212;&#8221;</p>

	<p>What&#8217;s sad is that you really are the best the Left has to offer&#8230;</p>

	<p>Steve</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168622</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168622</guid>
		<description>Punditry 101 &quot;Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Punditry 101 &#8220;Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humbucker</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168601</link>
		<dc:creator>humbucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168601</guid>
		<description>Steve: 

Shut the fück up -- your boy was wrong about Iraq, and has ZERO credibility.  Back in &#039;03, everyone agreed that Saddam must be disarmed, so why didn&#039;t Bush simply let Hans Blix&#039;s team of weapons inspectors FINISH THEIR GODDAMN JOBS before rushing to invade a country that DID NOT ATTACK US? 

Are you at all familiar with the concept of &#039;opportunity cost&#039;?  Personally, I can think of at least 2600 reasons why Dubya&#039;s &#039;war of choice&#039; in Iraq was a really sh!tty idea.  How many more people have to die in an unnecessary war before you demand that the architects of said war are hung by their testicles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve:</p>

	<p>Shut the f&#252;ck up&#8212;your boy was wrong about Iraq, and has <span class="caps">ZERO</span> credibility.  Back in &#8216;03, everyone agreed that Saddam must be disarmed, so why didn&#8217;t Bush simply let Hans Blix&#8217;s team of weapons inspectors <span class="caps">FINISH THEIR GODDAMN JOBS</span> before rushing to invade a country that <span class="caps">DID NOT ATTACK US</span>?</p>

	<p>Are you at all familiar with the concept of &#8216;opportunity cost&#8217;?  Personally, I can think of at least 2600 reasons why Dubya&#8217;s &#8216;war of choice&#8217; in Iraq was a really sh!tty idea.  How many more people have to die in an unnecessary war before you demand that the architects of said war are hung by their testicles?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bi</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168599</link>
		<dc:creator>bi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168599</guid>
		<description>And contrary to what CK said, &quot;we&quot; couldn&#039;t find weapons 5 months after April 2003, so 2 years after that, CK&#039;s words in April 2003 suddenly become right? What? &lt;em&gt;What?&lt;/em&gt;

Oh wait, Steve... you said something about &quot;news cycle&quot;. So you mean you get your daily news from freaking &lt;em&gt;blogs?&lt;/em&gt; That&#039;s cutting-edge, man. That&#039;s really cutting-edge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>And contrary to what CK said, &#8220;we&#8221; couldn&#8217;t find weapons 5 months after April 2003, so 2 years after that, CK&#8217;s words in April 2003 suddenly become right? What? <em>What?</em></p>

	<p>Oh wait, Steve&#8230; you said something about &#8220;news cycle&#8221;. So you mean you get your daily news from freaking <em>blogs?</em> That&#8217;s cutting-edge, man. That&#8217;s really cutting-edge.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168593</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168593</guid>
		<description>Jesus, Steve, at least you used to make some sort of sense.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;re really sure you&#039;ve made some kind of cutting point there, but it&#039;ll just have to live on in the solitude of your own mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jesus, Steve, at least you used to make some sort of sense.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re really sure you&#8217;ve made some kind of cutting point there, but it&#8217;ll just have to live on in the solitude of your own mind.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168580</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168580</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the man’s January 18, 2006 column, “The Iran Charade, Part II” in which he confidently proclaimed—contrary to the judgment of every relevant intelligence agency—that “Iran is probably just months away” from a nuclear bomb.&quot;

Note 1) its still months from January 18, 2006.  CK could be right.  Furthermore, 2) its nice to see you all trusting &#039;relevant intelligence agencies&#039;-an unexpected change.

&quot;Iraq WMDs back in April 2003.

Hans Blix had five months to find weapons. He found nothing. We’ve had five weeks. Come back to me in five months. If we haven’t found any, we will have a credibility problem.&quot;

Five months after April 2003 is September 2003.  BY YOUR OWN STANDARDS, this argument is two years and eleven months out of date.

I&#039;ve never even claimed to like, agree with, or even read Krauthammer.  I&#039;ve only made one claim; this post is out of date.  

I&#039;ve read that the blogosphere has compressed the news cycle to 36 hours.  I guess you all are just resisting a trend?

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;&#8230;the man&#8217;s January 18, 2006 column, &#8220;The Iran Charade, Part II&#8221; in which he confidently proclaimed&#8212;contrary to the judgment of every relevant intelligence agency&#8212;that &#8220;Iran is probably just months away&#8221; from a nuclear bomb.&#8221;</p>

	<p>Note 1) its still months from January 18, 2006.  CK could be right.  Furthermore, 2) its nice to see you all trusting &#8216;relevant intelligence agencies&#8217;-an unexpected change.</p>

	<p>&#8220;Iraq WMDs back in April 2003.</p>

	<p>Hans Blix had five months to find weapons. He found nothing. We&#8217;ve had five weeks. Come back to me in five months. If we haven&#8217;t found any, we will have a credibility problem.&#8221;</p>

	<p>Five months after April 2003 is September 2003.  <span class="caps">BY YOUR OWN STANDARDS</span>, this argument is two years and eleven months out of date.</p>

	<p>I&#8217;ve never even claimed to like, agree with, or even read Krauthammer.  I&#8217;ve only made one claim; this post is out of date.</p>

	<p>I&#8217;ve read that the blogosphere has compressed the news cycle to 36 hours.  I guess you all are just resisting a trend?</p>

	<p>Steve</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bi</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168574</link>
		<dc:creator>bi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168574</guid>
		<description>Duh... What do you do with people who have no sense of shame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Duh&#8230; What do you do with people who have no sense of shame?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lower tiberius</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168570</link>
		<dc:creator>lower tiberius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168570</guid>
		<description>accountability? ... no wonder they want to shut people like Sibel Edmonds and Cindy Sheehan up.  if everyone would mind their own business we wouldnt have any national security issues at all.  (or so they say</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>accountability? &#8230; no wonder they want to shut people like Sibel Edmonds and Cindy Sheehan up.  if everyone would mind their own business we wouldnt have any national security issues at all.  (or so they say</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lower tiberius</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168569</link>
		<dc:creator>lower tiberius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168569</guid>
		<description>same administration who called home and reappointed the leading diplomat in the (Balklands- Herzgonia area)m that was found to be a participating pedophile and procurer of passports and new identities for women that were later to be found living and working for wealthy clients in the Miami area</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>same administration who called home and reappointed the leading diplomat in the (Balklands- Herzgonia area)m that was found to be a participating pedophile and procurer of passports and new identities for women that were later to be found living and working for wealthy clients in the Miami area</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lower tiberius</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168566</link>
		<dc:creator>lower tiberius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168566</guid>
		<description>same administration who never murmured a minor guttural utterance about a convicted felon working in the Greece embassy who&#039;d made a living out of manufacturing and distributing phoney AMERCAN passports who was allowed to hawk contracts with New York Public Schools system and was also arrested afterwards for alledged &quot;racketeering&quot; and fraud for those very same public school contracts.  One of Jack Abrahamoffs buddies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>same administration who never murmured a minor guttural utterance about a convicted felon working in the Greece embassy who&#8217;d made a living out of manufacturing and distributing phoney <span class="caps">AMERCAN</span> passports who was allowed to hawk contracts with New York Public Schools system and was also arrested afterwards for alledged &#8220;racketeering&#8221; and fraud for those very same public school contracts.  One of Jack Abrahamoffs buddies</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-168565</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/08/11/credibility-problems/#comment-168565</guid>
		<description>Steve and Krauthammer work like a well-trained team together... 

Krauthammer: In the future, my predictions will be proved correct! 

CT: No they won&#039;t, that&#039;s nonsense. 

Krauthammer: You can&#039;t criticize me now! You have to wait until the future, to see whether I&#039;m right. 

[time passes...]

CT: Okay, you were full of crap, just like we said. 

Up pops Steve: You can&#039;t criticize now, after all this time! If you had something to say, you should have said it when he made his prediction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Steve and Krauthammer work like a well-trained team together&#8230;</p>

	<p>Krauthammer: In the future, my predictions will be proved correct!</p>

	<p>CT: No they won&#8217;t, that&#8217;s nonsense.</p>

	<p>Krauthammer: You can&#8217;t criticize me now! You have to wait until the future, to see whether I&#8217;m right.</p>

	<p>[time passes&#8230;]</p>

	<p>CT: Okay, you were full of crap, just like we said.</p>

	<p>Up pops Steve: You can&#8217;t criticize now, after all this time! If you had something to say, you should have said it when he made his prediction.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

