<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even more dubious about demography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:04:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sm</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/comment-page-1/#comment-178670</link>
		<dc:creator>sm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/#comment-178670</guid>
		<description>Ever read Asimov&#039;s R. Daneel Olivaw books? Caves of Steel and The Naked Sun?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ever read Asimov&#8217;s R. Daneel Olivaw books? Caves of Steel and The Naked Sun?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MQ</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/comment-page-1/#comment-178635</link>
		<dc:creator>MQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 18:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/#comment-178635</guid>
		<description>Life was better before all of our Mr. Cunninghams had blogs.  Not to mention op-ed columns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Life was better before all of our Mr. Cunninghams had blogs.  Not to mention op-ed columns.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Emerson</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/comment-page-1/#comment-178574</link>
		<dc:creator>John Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/#comment-178574</guid>
		<description>Mr. Deasy: 

&quot;And the pity of it that the ignorant Irish Catholics continue to proliferate, being kept alive by the misguided charitable impulses of the English.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Mr. Deasy:</p>

	<p>&#8220;And the pity of it that the ignorant Irish Catholics continue to proliferate, being kept alive by the misguided charitable impulses of the English.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stostosto</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/comment-page-1/#comment-178571</link>
		<dc:creator>stostosto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/even-more-dubious-about-demography/#comment-178571</guid>
		<description>&quot;Good afternoon, Mr. Bertram&quot;.

&quot;-&quot;

&quot;The birth-rate in Manchester, you say? Ah, yes. Very serious thing, indeed. But at 1.84 it&#039;s at least above national average&quot;.

&quot;is that so?&quot;

&quot;Yes. But more to the point, it&#039;s much higher than that of Liverpool. It&#039;s only 1.48 for them scally scousers, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/KPVS31_2004/Revised_KPVS2004.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;snort.&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

&quot;Oh...&quot;

&quot;Heartening, I should say, eh?&quot;

&quot;Good afternoon, er...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Good afternoon, Mr. Bertram&#8221;.</p>

	<p>&#8220;-&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;The birth-rate in Manchester, you say? Ah, yes. Very serious thing, indeed. But at 1.84 it&#8217;s at least above national average&#8221;.</p>

	<p>&#8220;is that so?&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Yes. But more to the point, it&#8217;s much higher than that of Liverpool. It&#8217;s only 1.48 for them scally scousers, <a href="http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/KPVS31_2004/Revised_KPVS2004.pdf" rel="nofollow">snort.</a>&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Oh&#8230;&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Heartening, I should say, eh?&#8221;</p>

	<p>&#8220;Good afternoon, er&#8230;&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
