<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relativities: local and global</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Progress versus economic growth</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-179240</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Progress versus economic growth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-179240</guid>
		<description>[...] Over at Marginal Revolution, Tyler Cowen has responded to &#8220;my claim::http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/ that, once societies have achieved a certain threshold level, continued growth in output doesn&#8217;t matter that much (and that inequalities among such societies matter little, certainly when set beside the absolute poverty of the global poor). Tyler writes: Just as the present appears remarkable from the vantage point of the past, our future may offer comparable advances in benefits. Continued progress might bring greater life expectancies, cures for debilitating diseases, and cognitive enhancements. Millions or billions of people will have much better and longer lives. Many features of modern life might someday seem as backward as we now regard the large number of women who died in childbirth for lack of proper care. Most of all, economic growth limits and mitigates tragedies. It is a simple failure of imagination to believe that human progress has run its course. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Over at Marginal Revolution, Tyler Cowen has responded to &#8220;my claim::<a href="http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/" rel="nofollow">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/</a> that, once societies have achieved a certain threshold level, continued growth in output doesn&#8217;t matter that much (and that inequalities among such societies matter little, certainly when set beside the absolute poverty of the global poor). Tyler writes: Just as the present appears remarkable from the vantage point of the past, our future may offer comparable advances in benefits. Continued progress might bring greater life expectancies, cures for debilitating diseases, and cognitive enhancements. Millions or billions of people will have much better and longer lives. Many features of modern life might someday seem as backward as we now regard the large number of women who died in childbirth for lack of proper care. Most of all, economic growth limits and mitigates tragedies. It is a simple failure of imagination to believe that human progress has run its course. [...]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adamsmithee</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178817</link>
		<dc:creator>Adamsmithee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178817</guid>
		<description>The arguments in the Moral Consequences of Economic Growth don&#039;t actually hold up to much empirical scrutiny.  The links between &lt;a href=&quot;http://adamsmithee.blogs.com/blog/2006/05/health_and_inco.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; income growth&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://charleskenny.blogs.com/weblog/2006/10/life_liberty_an_6.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; health outcomes&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://adamsmithee.blogs.com/blog/2005/03/dont_trust_fuku.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; income growth and democracy&lt;/a&gt;, or income growth and happiness, &lt;a href=&quot;http://charleskenny.blogs.com/weblog/2006/01/does_developmen_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; even in poor countries&lt;/a&gt;, are weak.  Technology and institutional change explain most of the variation in health, rights and happiness over time, and relative income effects seem to be fairly localized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The arguments in the Moral Consequences of Economic Growth don&#8217;t actually hold up to much empirical scrutiny.  The links between <a href="http://adamsmithee.blogs.com/blog/2006/05/health_and_inco.html" rel="nofollow"> income growth</a> and <a href="http://charleskenny.blogs.com/weblog/2006/10/life_liberty_an_6.html" rel="nofollow"> health outcomes</a>, or <a href="http://adamsmithee.blogs.com/blog/2005/03/dont_trust_fuku.html" rel="nofollow"> income growth and democracy</a>, or income growth and happiness, <a href="http://charleskenny.blogs.com/weblog/2006/01/does_developmen_1.html" rel="nofollow"> even in poor countries</a>, are weak.  Technology and institutional change explain most of the variation in health, rights and happiness over time, and relative income effects seem to be fairly localized.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abb1</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178814</link>
		<dc:creator>abb1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178814</guid>
		<description>As far tyranny being tragic - a lot of people everywhere wouldn&#039;t know civil liberties from a hole in the ground. They live their lives, don&#039;t care about politics, play the hand they were dealt. And they might be happy or unhappy depending on many variables, civil liberties and economic opportunities being only a small part of it. 

I have friends in Germany. Anecdotally, many eastern Germans are quite nostalgic for the communist past. Fewer opportunities - but less risk, less uncertainty, more peace of mind; this is not black and white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As far tyranny being tragic &#8211; a lot of people everywhere wouldn&#8217;t know civil liberties from a hole in the ground. They live their lives, don&#8217;t care about politics, play the hand they were dealt. And they might be happy or unhappy depending on many variables, civil liberties and economic opportunities being only a small part of it.</p>

	<p>I have friends in Germany. Anecdotally, many eastern Germans are quite nostalgic for the communist past. Fewer opportunities &#8211; but less risk, less uncertainty, more peace of mind; this is not black and white.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Meleney</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178805</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Meleney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178805</guid>
		<description>Professor Bertram:
 
I agree 100% with your points that lower, and even much lower GDP can be quite tolerable, and I have lived happily in Thailand and China quite simply. I wish more Americans (Brits too) recognized what you are saying here.  
 
But I ask you to consider those folk you remember from your travels in East Germany....  to the extent they seemed less joyful was it partly because their lack of economic freedoms made them less the &quot;author or their own life&quot;?
 
And when you consider the amazing range of opportunities open to your children and mine....would you for a second want our children to be stuck in East German economy, even if they had the full range of civil liberties?

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Professor Bertram:</p>

	<p>I agree 100% with your points that lower, and even much lower <span class="caps">GDP</span> can be quite tolerable, and I have lived happily in Thailand and China quite simply. I wish more Americans (Brits too) recognized what you are saying here.</p>

	<p>But I ask you to consider those folk you remember from your travels in East Germany&#8230;.  to the extent they seemed less joyful was it partly because their lack of economic freedoms made them less the &#8220;author or their own life&#8221;?</p>

	<p>And when you consider the amazing range of opportunities open to your children and mine&#8230;.would you for a second want our children to be stuck in East German economy, even if they had the full range of civil liberties?</p>

	<p>Dave</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bertram</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178782</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bertram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178782</guid>
		<description>To reiterate the point as I put it at MR: I find it very possible to imagine people living decent lives with free institutions at very much lower levels of per capita GDP than United States in 2006. That people live under tyrannies is tragic. That they experience the standard of living of Americans in the 1950s, Brits in the 1960s or that Europeans experience a lower rate of _increase_ in prosperity over the next 30 years than American will is not tragic. If you think that sort of attituded evinces disdain for anyone, I&#039;m truly sorry for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>To reiterate the point as I put it at MR: I find it very possible to imagine people living decent lives with free institutions at very much lower levels of per capita <span class="caps">GDP</span> than United States in 2006. That people live under tyrannies is tragic. That they experience the standard of living of Americans in the 1950s, Brits in the 1960s or that Europeans experience a lower rate of <em>increase</em> in prosperity over the next 30 years than American will is not tragic. If you think that sort of attituded evinces disdain for anyone, I&#8217;m truly sorry for you.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Meleney</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178776</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Meleney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178776</guid>
		<description>Prof Bertram:
So If I understand you, you suggest that the East German total productivity was not &quot;the real problem,&quot; since party members and the military were raking off such a percentage of the whole that most people you met there ended up living very, very simply. 

But your statement still resonates with a disdain for the economic liberties and economic well-being of those East Germans you traveled amongst, and I&#039;ll include more context because it really clarifies your meaning: &quot;But real problem with East Germany was not its comparative level of economic development or the level of health care its citizens could receive (rather good, actually).  It was the fact that it was a police state where people were denied the basic liberties.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Prof Bertram:<br />
So If I understand you, you suggest that the East German total productivity was not &#8220;the real problem,&#8221; since party members and the military were raking off such a percentage of the whole that most people you met there ended up living very, very simply.</p>

	<p>But your statement still resonates with a disdain for the economic liberties and economic well-being of those East Germans you traveled amongst, and I&#8217;ll include more context because it really clarifies your meaning: &#8220;But real problem with East Germany was not its comparative level of economic development or the level of health care its citizens could receive (rather good, actually).  It was the fact that it was a police state where people were denied the basic liberties.&#8221; </p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178765</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178765</guid>
		<description>Chris, as I read your response to Dave, I can&#039;t help but think you may have a point on what you said, but not on your argument.  You do mean to deny, don&#039;t you, that there was any moral problem with E. Germany&#039;s poverty, don&#039;t you? An egalitarian system that, relatively speaking, impoverishes is morally permissible, in your view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Chris, as I read your response to Dave, I can&#8217;t help but think you may have a point on what you said, but not on your argument.  You do mean to deny, don&#8217;t you, that there was any moral problem with E. Germany&#8217;s poverty, don&#8217;t you? An egalitarian system that, relatively speaking, impoverishes is morally permissible, in your view.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Holsclaw</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178762</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Holsclaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178762</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems to me obvious why the perception of “local” inequities and inequalities would outweigh the importance of distant international comparisons. It’s at the “local” level that one’s interactions occur, and it’s the quality of one’s iteractions and social relationships, far more than any abstract quantitative measure of wealth, (which may just be wasteful or underutilized anyway), that mostly determines one’s sense and perception of well-being.&quot;

How does this square with the Middle East?  A large number of people in places like Saudi Arabia seem perfectly capable of focusing more on the US than their own overlords.  

&quot;Tim, you seem to be moving rather more quickly than is warranted from economic growth, to technological progress in general, to improvements in medical technology, to improvements in health outcomes (same goes for Tyler’s response on his site btw).&quot;

Europe can probably free ride off of the US market for medical technology so long as the US government doesn&#039;t screw up the market too badly.  (This will apply to things with low marginal cost and high research costs only--something like drugs.  If the technology turns on really expensive machines, Europe will have to wait for the price to come way down if its economic growth has lagged for a couple of decades.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;It seems to me obvious why the perception of &#8220;local&#8221; inequities and inequalities would outweigh the importance of distant international comparisons. It&#8217;s at the &#8220;local&#8221; level that one&#8217;s interactions occur, and it&#8217;s the quality of one&#8217;s iteractions and social relationships, far more than any abstract quantitative measure of wealth, (which may just be wasteful or underutilized anyway), that mostly determines one&#8217;s sense and perception of well-being.&#8221;</p>

	<p>How does this square with the Middle East?  A large number of people in places like Saudi Arabia seem perfectly capable of focusing more on the US than their own overlords.</p>

	<p>&#8220;Tim, you seem to be moving rather more quickly than is warranted from economic growth, to technological progress in general, to improvements in medical technology, to improvements in health outcomes (same goes for Tyler&#8217;s response on his site btw).&#8221;</p>

	<p>Europe can probably free ride off of the US market for medical technology so long as the US government doesn&#8217;t screw up the market too badly.  (This will apply to things with low marginal cost and high research costs only&#8212;something like drugs.  If the technology turns on really expensive machines, Europe will have to wait for the price to come way down if its economic growth has lagged for a couple of decades.)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hurka</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178753</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hurka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178753</guid>
		<description>FWIW, isn&#039;t Frank&#039;s more recent view that ponds are getting bigger, i.e. one&#039;s happiness depends more on comparisons with people far away than it did even twenty years ago, since e.g. even people in developing countries can now watch US TV shows about rich and glamorous housewives and compare their own lot with the ones on the screen? I remember that as one of the themes of the Winner-Takes-All book and/or Luxury Fever, and it&#039;s a departure from his earlier view that only local hierarchies matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><span class="caps">FWIW</span>, isn&#8217;t Frank&#8217;s more recent view that ponds are getting bigger, i.e. one&#8217;s happiness depends more on comparisons with people far away than it did even twenty years ago, since e.g. even people in developing countries can now watch <span class="caps">US TV</span> shows about rich and glamorous housewives and compare their own lot with the ones on the screen? I remember that as one of the themes of the Winner-Takes-All book and/or Luxury Fever, and it&#8217;s a departure from his earlier view that only local hierarchies matter.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Meleney</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178742</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Meleney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178742</guid>
		<description>Over at Marginal Revolution Professor Bertram chastises me thusly:

&quot;Hmm, let&#039;s see. I write:

&quot;But the real problem with East Germany was not its comparative level of economic development or the level of health care its citizens could receive (rather good, actually).&quot;

and David Meleney reads:

&quot;Professor Bertram&#039;s position is that the poverty of the East Germans he encountered .....was not &#039;a real problem.&#039;&quot;

Remedial reading class needed?&quot;

Having lived for short periods with poor people in the 3rd world, I am awaiting a more detailed explanation of the difference between what Professor Bertram said and my paraphrase of his statement.  

Awaiting remediation,
Dave Meleney

[Simple. Your elementary comprehension failure has two parts: (1) To say that X is not &quot;the problem&quot; with respect to some question does not imply a denial  that X is , unrestrictedly, &quot;a problem&quot;; (2) my comment concerned the level of economic development of the country and your reading of it concerned the poverty of its citizens. It is perfectly possible for one country to have a higher level of economic development than another country whilst its citizens are in greater poverty, because, e.g. of the diversion of productive resources to goals other than consumption. CB]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Over at Marginal Revolution Professor Bertram chastises me thusly:</p>

	<p>&#8220;Hmm, let&#8217;s see. I write:</p>

	<p>&#8220;But the real problem with East Germany was not its comparative level of economic development or the level of health care its citizens could receive (rather good, actually).&#8221;</p>

	<p>and David Meleney reads:</p>

	<p>&#8220;Professor Bertram&#8217;s position is that the poverty of the East Germans he encountered &#8230;..was not &#8216;a real problem.&#8217;&#8221;</p>

	<p>Remedial reading class needed?&#8221;</p>

	<p>Having lived for short periods with poor people in the 3rd world, I am awaiting a more detailed explanation of the difference between what Professor Bertram said and my paraphrase of his statement.</p>

	<p>Awaiting remediation,<br />
Dave Meleney</p>

	<p>[Simple. Your elementary comprehension failure has two parts: (1) To say that X is not &#8220;the problem&#8221; with respect to some question does not imply a denial  that X is , unrestrictedly, &#8220;a problem&#8221;; (2) my comment concerned the level of economic development of the country and your reading of it concerned the poverty of its citizens. It is perfectly possible for one country to have a higher level of economic development than another country whilst its citizens are in greater poverty, because, e.g. of the diversion of productive resources to goals other than consumption. CB]</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bertram</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178716</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bertram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178716</guid>
		<description>Tim, you seem to be moving rather more quickly than is warranted from economic growth, to technological progress in general, to improvements in medical technology, to improvements in health outcomes (same goes for Tyler&#039;s response on his site btw). I may try to write a post on this in a couple of days when I&#039;ve got some time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Tim, you seem to be moving rather more quickly than is warranted from economic growth, to technological progress in general, to improvements in medical technology, to improvements in health outcomes (same goes for Tyler&#8217;s response on his site btw). I may try to write a post on this in a couple of days when I&#8217;ve got some time.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timon Braun</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-2/#comment-178713</link>
		<dc:creator>Timon Braun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178713</guid>
		<description>These &quot;absolutely decent lives in Hamburg, Paris or Bristol&quot; seem primarily to involve the ability to vote and security in the knowledge that your boss won&#039;t be cured of the disease that kills you.  That may have a health upside, but does it outweigh the known benefits of, for example, antiretrovirals, or breast carcinoma treatment?  Are you really prepared to claim that the marginal benefit to equality in allowing a lump to metastasize is greater than the benefit of allowing a child to meet his grandmother?  It is not a spineless apology for greed to notice that The Ministry of Groundbreaking Cures somehow never comes up with them.  The companies whose exorbitant treatments are now the subject of billion-dollar Wall St intrigues and are creating what in 15 years time will be considered absolute prerequisites to the &quot;absolutely decent life&quot; in Hamburg and Bristol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>These &#8220;absolutely decent lives in Hamburg, Paris or Bristol&#8221; seem primarily to involve the ability to vote and security in the knowledge that your boss won&#8217;t be cured of the disease that kills you.  That may have a health upside, but does it outweigh the known benefits of, for example, antiretrovirals, or breast carcinoma treatment?  Are you really prepared to claim that the marginal benefit to equality in allowing a lump to metastasize is greater than the benefit of allowing a child to meet his grandmother?  It is not a spineless apology for greed to notice that The Ministry of Groundbreaking Cures somehow never comes up with them.  The companies whose exorbitant treatments are now the subject of billion-dollar Wall St intrigues and are creating what in 15 years time will be considered absolute prerequisites to the &#8220;absolutely decent life&#8221; in Hamburg and Bristol.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butwhatif</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-1/#comment-178710</link>
		<dc:creator>butwhatif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178710</guid>
		<description>&quot;I still don’t understand this unhappiness business, its correlation with relative wealth; either internationally or individually.&quot; 

I seem to remember, throughout the 90s, how guff about &quot;Italia: quinta potenza industrielle&quot; worked to keep 59 million people quite content, deflecting attention away from the elite and domestic problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;I still don&#8217;t understand this unhappiness business, its correlation with relative wealth; either internationally or individually.&#8221;</p>

	<p>I seem to remember, throughout the 90s, how guff about &#8220;Italia: quinta potenza industrielle&#8221; worked to keep 59 million people quite content, deflecting attention away from the elite and domestic problems.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abb1</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-1/#comment-178697</link>
		<dc:creator>abb1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178697</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that perception of international inequities might be incorrect, but it isn&#039;t necessarily more distant than the local kind. 

People normally live in a homogeneous environment and their social iteractions don&#039;t involve visiting palaces. In fact, they may have a much better chance of meeting foreign tourists with fancy camcorders than their own overlords. No fellow countryman ever invited me to spend a summer on his yacht or hitch a ride on her personal jet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s true that perception of international inequities might be incorrect, but it isn&#8217;t necessarily more distant than the local kind.</p>

	<p>People normally live in a homogeneous environment and their social iteractions don&#8217;t involve visiting palaces. In fact, they may have a much better chance of meeting foreign tourists with fancy camcorders than their own overlords. No fellow countryman ever invited me to spend a summer on his yacht or hitch a ride on her personal jet.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetruth</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/comment-page-1/#comment-178692</link>
		<dc:creator>thetruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2006/11/13/relativities-local-and-global/#comment-178692</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s at the “local” level that one’s interactions occur, and it’s the quality of one’s iteractions and social relationships, far more than any abstract quantitative measure of wealth, (which may just be wasteful or underutilized anyway), that mostly determines one’s sense and perception of well-being.&lt;/i&gt;

Or to put it another way, your girlfriend is relatively unlikely to dump you because she has decided to move to Norway where the standard of living there is higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>It&#8217;s at the &#8220;local&#8221; level that one&#8217;s interactions occur, and it&#8217;s the quality of one&#8217;s iteractions and social relationships, far more than any abstract quantitative measure of wealth, (which may just be wasteful or underutilized anyway), that mostly determines one&#8217;s sense and perception of well-being.</i></p>

	<p>Or to put it another way, your girlfriend is relatively unlikely to dump you because she has decided to move to Norway where the standard of living there is higher.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 09:45:13 -->
