That seems a little too over-thought for me, but could be.

I don’t think government sponsored homosexualism is the answer, but I’m willing to discuss it. More likely we should begin in early developement; initially by removing from among those involved in the care of young children anyone who refuses to have sexual relations with another consenting adult. Of course we could simply ban Catholic education, but that might cause problems.

My proposal would make children’s lives and their parent’s as well, a lot more secure without religious descrimination per se. Perhaps we should institute some sort of test, a requirement: once a year to be observed in sexual activity (with another person) by a group of experts, with subjects’ activities judged for sincerity.
We coud even make it a group thing, for budgetary purposes of course.
Just tossing that out. I think we do need real reform, if we’re going to ride out this terror thing we’re going through these days.

Actually, I was referring to your use of the term “illegitimacy.” Which is why I put the word in quotes.

The sexual revolutional is tainted because sex is tainted by power relations.

I’ve also seen someone claim that the ad was aimed more at white women than at the men. The point was to conflate voting for Ford with wanting him, and offer up a sense of superiority to the sort of tawdry skank who goes in for That Kind of Thing.

Fitz: I have to admit I’d written off the prospect of you providing a direct reference. Thank you for proving me wrong. I apologize for implying that you were making up the 70% figure—it turns out that this does accord with government stats at least.

I’d question your use of “underclass” as interchangeable with “black,” since the American underclass is multi-racial—but it’s indisputable that blacks are vastly disproportionately part of that underclass and that this helps explain their greater vulnerability to the nonmarital fertility trend.

We’re still left with the problem of tying this in with your other concerns or of establishing that this says anything in particular about “the sexual revolution” as such (it seems unlikely to be that simple). There are productive conversations to be had about that—but seriously, you’ll find it easier to have them if your first step isn’t to show up and lecture The Left™ about its blind unwillingness to Talk About the Real Issues. Examine shoulder, remove chip, and you’ll be pleasantly surprised at how much the dynamic can change.

I guess I’ll hold your hand this time.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/misc/wedlock.pdf

Be sure to inquire further into the veracity of the statistics. As if you’re unaware of the particularly acute problem of illegitimacy among our nations underclass. You must work at a university to have that set of blinders.

Yes Uncle, according to Dr. Slack the new politically correct term is “nonwhite”

a bit broad- and not to catchy.

As someone reminded me, the real point of the bimbo ad run against Harold Ford was not that he liked white women, but that white women liked him.
need I say more?

If you’re pointing to the first result in that search, that would be a several-decades-old report that doesn’t at any point (that I can see) claim a 70% nonwhite illegitimacy rate.

To do so would be to watch there stilted worldviews come crashing down around them.

You know, the “brave maverick in the land of the blind” routine is often a mark of cranks. This also may help to explain why people react negatively to you in contexts like this one.

Miles to go before we sleep. Somebody brew a pot of coffee.

“people don’t take (me) seriously” on this blog because they don’t take themselves seriously.

To do so would be to watch there stilted worldviews come crashing down around them.

Why? That doesn’t answer the question I asked you.

See, it’s evasions like that that will tempt people to conclude you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about, and are prone to pulling facts and figures out of your arse. Which in turn would mean that your “poignant truths” are about as “resonant” as a bad case of flatulence, and maybe that’s why people don’t take you seriously.

I will point you to the above post #142

I will reiterate the importance of the term “resonance”

and add the cliché – “forest for the tree’s”

P.S. One must use “underclass” instead of “black” least the conversation devolve into “racism” (sadly)