dsquared, you raise valid concerns. We chose the beneficiaries of The Darfur Wall because we believe that advocacy and humanitarian aid are complementary approaches to the Darfur problem. We must help the people of Darfur, but we must also pressure the people in power.

I should say, too, that your description of Eric Reeves’ Sudan Aid Fund is not accurate. Much of the Sudan Aid Fund goes to humanitarian causes, including MSF and Save the Children. You can find Eric Reeves and the fund in MSF’s recent annual report.

generally, though, I have become quite disillusioned with the effect relief agencies have on conflicts like these; a lot of humanitarian catastrophes are the result of bad government and lack of international will to push the parties towards conflict resolution; it seems to me that putting pressure on the powers that be to reach a political solution is a much more efficient way to help the victims of such conflicts and that, while short-term relief is necessary, long-term efforts can actually be counterproductive, as they have the side-effect of stabilizing a horrible situation letting the conflict parties carry on doing what they do and the international community get away with ignoring it

the above is just a somewhat informed intuition, I’m curious what others with maybe more information or even experience have to say

Save the Children (although it’s not clear whether you can specify Darfur as the target cause, but I’m sure their other causes need plenty of support as well)

Doctors without Borders links to various country organizations. U.S. here. Again, no way to specify target spending, I don’t think.