<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Childrens&#8217; books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2007/01/30/childrens-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/01/30/childrens-books/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:43:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dipnut</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/01/30/childrens-books/comment-page-1/#comment-185468</link>
		<dc:creator>dipnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/01/30/childrens-books/#comment-185468</guid>
		<description>Hm.  I never thought of &lt;i&gt;The Borribles&lt;/i&gt; as a class-struggle allegory before (perhaps I&#039;m reading too much into this post and the solitary comment so far).  Just enjoyed the books.

To the extent there&#039;s &quot;angry politics&quot; in &lt;i&gt;The Borribles&lt;/i&gt;, it seems to me to be, uh, libertarian or something.  Certainly the upper-crusty Rumbles are not the most fearsome or hateful villains in the book.  Dewdrop and Flinthead, each a vile authoritarian in his own way, vie for top honors in this category.  I suppose you could wedge Dewdrop into the capitalist robber-baron category, whereas Flinthead is a perfect Fascist.

And then there&#039;s the cops.

Younger readers will thankfully be spared consideration of possible socio-political commentary when reading the books.  They are really good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hm.  I never thought of <i>The Borribles</i> as a class-struggle allegory before (perhaps I&#8217;m reading too much into this post and the solitary comment so far).  Just enjoyed the books.</p>

	<p>To the extent there&#8217;s &#8220;angry politics&#8221; in <i>The Borribles</i>, it seems to me to be, uh, libertarian or something.  Certainly the upper-crusty Rumbles are not the most fearsome or hateful villains in the book.  Dewdrop and Flinthead, each a vile authoritarian in his own way, vie for top honors in this category.  I suppose you could wedge Dewdrop into the capitalist robber-baron category, whereas Flinthead is a perfect Fascist.</p>

	<p>And then there&#8217;s the cops.</p>

	<p>Younger readers will thankfully be spared consideration of possible socio-political commentary when reading the books.  They are really good.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrickg</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/01/30/childrens-books/comment-page-1/#comment-185366</link>
		<dc:creator>patrickg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/01/30/childrens-books/#comment-185366</guid>
		<description>Those books were a revelation to me when I read them last year.

It&#039;s such a shame de Larrabeiti didn&#039;t write more. I love the angry politics to the books, the unabashed violence, death and strong emotion. 

I felt like de Larrabeiti - like all good childrens&#039; lit authors - understands that childhood is not something that children themselves view as nostalgic, but rather a time of intense emotions, fear, violence and love, etc. So much more resonant than watered-down vision of childhood a la famous five or what-have-you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Those books were a revelation to me when I read them last year.</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s such a shame de Larrabeiti didn&#8217;t write more. I love the angry politics to the books, the unabashed violence, death and strong emotion.</p>

	<p>I felt like de Larrabeiti &#8211; like all good childrens&#8217; lit authors &#8211; understands that childhood is not something that children themselves view as nostalgic, but rather a time of intense emotions, fear, violence and love, etc. So much more resonant than watered-down vision of childhood a la famous five or what-have-you.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

