<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FT for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mistah charley, ph.d.</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-212679</link>
		<dc:creator>mistah charley, ph.d.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 13:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/#comment-212679</guid>
		<description>missus charley, m.d. and i get the Financial Times (we are by no means financiers, but it was an option to use airline miles about to expire) and we are favorably impressed with it, not only the reporting, but the cultural stuff and the commentary - the contrast of the editorial opinions with those expressed at the PRE-Murdoch WSJ is quite striking

my dad, retired army colonel charley, sr., has had a return to relative sociopolitical sanity since he stopped reading the WSJ a couple of years ago - now he sees how psychotic the still pro-bush views of my stepmother are - this has had the effect of intensifying his unhappiness with his second marriage - who knows if it&#039;s good or bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>missus charley, m.d. and i get the Financial Times (we are by no means financiers, but it was an option to use airline miles about to expire) and we are favorably impressed with it, not only the reporting, but the cultural stuff and the commentary &#8211; the contrast of the editorial opinions with those expressed at the <span class="caps">PRE</span>-Murdoch <span class="caps">WSJ</span> is quite striking</p>

	<p>my dad, retired army colonel charley, sr., has had a return to relative sociopolitical sanity since he stopped reading the <span class="caps">WSJ</span> a couple of years ago &#8211; now he sees how psychotic the still pro-bush views of my stepmother are &#8211; this has had the effect of intensifying his unhappiness with his second marriage &#8211; who knows if it&#8217;s good or bad?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garhane</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-212598</link>
		<dc:creator>garhane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/#comment-212598</guid>
		<description>Hold the phone here, this sounds like an echo of an angry old 19th Century German pounding out words on a library table in the British Museum: &quot;...the social conditions of production  become absolutely incompatible with the institutions of private property...&quot;

You do know what happens after that.

But just look at the poetry of it. That rotten Murdoch who grabbed the WSJ, itself a purveyor of the very worst wild reactionary rants---their editorial page was famous as the irrational while their practical business articles were considered the best---and now finds it is not good business to do the pay all who enter here route. Too rich for words.

Now we have to see Gates in an hysterical fury over the inroads of a hundred other guys, attempt to put out the operating system for free while creating a  hundred hobbles for all customers to stumble over when they attempt to use it. Oh, he has already done that, hasn&#039;t  he? 

Would it not be truly great to see these Mastodons race into a solid wall, one after the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hold the phone here, this sounds like an echo of an angry old 19th Century German pounding out words on a library table in the British Museum: &#8220;&#8230;the social conditions of production  become absolutely incompatible with the institutions of private property&#8230;&#8221;</p>

	<p>You do know what happens after that.</p>

	<p>But just look at the poetry of it. That rotten Murdoch who grabbed the <span class="caps">WSJ</span>, itself a purveyor of the very worst wild reactionary rants&#8212;-their editorial page was famous as the irrational while their practical business articles were considered the best&#8212;-and now finds it is not good business to do the pay all who enter here route. Too rich for words.</p>

	<p>Now we have to see Gates in an hysterical fury over the inroads of a hundred other guys, attempt to put out the operating system for free while creating a  hundred hobbles for all customers to stumble over when they attempt to use it. Oh, he has already done that, hasn&#8217;t  he?</p>

	<p>Would it not be truly great to see these Mastodons race into a solid wall, one after the other.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry b</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-212548</link>
		<dc:creator>harry b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/#comment-212548</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a typo Henry. &#039;The FT is a genuinely excellent newspaper&#039; should read &#039;The FT is &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; genuinely excellent newspaper&#039;. Unless there&#039;s one I haven&#039;t come across (relativized to English language, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There&#8217;s a typo Henry. &#8216;The FT is a genuinely excellent newspaper&#8217; should read &#8216;The FT is <i>the</i> genuinely excellent newspaper&#8217;. Unless there&#8217;s one I haven&#8217;t come across (relativized to English language, of course).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barrisj</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-212535</link>
		<dc:creator>barrisj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/#comment-212535</guid>
		<description>The NYT giving up its ill-considered &quot;Select&quot; op-ed subscription service went a long way in prompting other major news media with an on-line presence to pack in pay-for-view...and the Times&#039; decision no doubt was edged along by Murdoch&#039;s WSJ plans.  These people finally figured out that you don&#039;t get the eyeballs with a subscription firewall in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The <span class="caps">NYT</span> giving up its ill-considered &#8220;Select&#8221; op-ed subscription service went a long way in prompting other major news media with an on-line presence to pack in pay-for-view&#8230;and the Times&#8217; decision no doubt was edged along by Murdoch&#8217;s <span class="caps">WSJ</span> plans.  These people finally figured out that you don&#8217;t get the eyeballs with a subscription firewall in place.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sock Puppet of the Great Satan</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-212528</link>
		<dc:creator>Sock Puppet of the Great Satan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/#comment-212528</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s a real gap in the US market for an intelligent, internationalist newspaper&quot;

The CS Monitor, if it had better circulation, could fill that role. 

We can get home delivery of the FT, so we get both it and the Monitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a real gap in the US market for an intelligent, internationalist newspaper&#8221;</p>

	<p>The <span class="caps">CS </span>Monitor, if it had better circulation, could fill that role.</p>

	<p>We can get home delivery of the FT, so we get both it and the Monitor.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-212519</link>
		<dc:creator>P O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/01/ft-for-free/#comment-212519</guid>
		<description>One thing I can&#039;t tell is whether they intend to include articles that are currently free in the 30/month allowance.  But it sounds like they mean the stuff that previously cost i.e. the analysis articles and the business section.  

Interesting too that they cite the ability of bloggers to link as one consideration in the decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One thing I can&#8217;t tell is whether they intend to include articles that are currently free in the 30/month allowance.  But it sounds like they mean the stuff that previously cost i.e. the analysis articles and the business section.</p>

	<p>Interesting too that they cite the ability of bloggers to link as one consideration in the decision.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 04:27:48 -->
