<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Podcast Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bérubé</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/comment-page-1/#comment-212981</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bérubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/#comment-212981</guid>
		<description>Oops!  I meant &quot;read&quot; in the past tense, as in &quot;it was really nasty of Gitlin to suggest that you &lt;i&gt;had read&lt;/i&gt; his book.&quot;  Damn this ambiguous language!  Give me Latin, where the pluperfect is easy to spot, even in blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oops!  I meant &#8220;read&#8221; in the past tense, as in &#8220;it was really nasty of Gitlin to suggest that you <i>had read</i> his book.&#8221;  Damn this ambiguous language!  Give me Latin, where the pluperfect is easy to spot, even in blogs.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott McLemee</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/comment-page-1/#comment-212967</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott McLemee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/#comment-212967</guid>
		<description>Actually, Gitlin didn&#039;t recommend that. It&#039;s my own damned fault. At one news organization, the tendency to read earlier books by an author I was profiling -- and then, what was much worse, to discuss them in the piece -- was regarded as peculiar and something to be discouraged. It wasn&#039;t forbidden, of course, but there were strong hints that it &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; was not necessary. 

Steven Wasserman&#039;s long article in the latest issue of &lt;em&gt;Columbia Journalism Review&lt;/em&gt; suggests this was not an unusual situation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Actually, Gitlin didn&#8217;t recommend that. It&#8217;s my own damned fault. At one news organization, the tendency to read earlier books by an author I was profiling&#8212;and then, what was much worse, to discuss them in the piece&#8212;was regarded as peculiar and something to be discouraged. It wasn&#8217;t forbidden, of course, but there were strong hints that it <em>really</em> was not necessary.</p>

	<p>Steven Wasserman&#8217;s long article in the latest issue of <em>Columbia Journalism Review</em> suggests this was not an unusual situation.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/comment-page-1/#comment-212940</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/#comment-212940</guid>
		<description>Moira Gunn (of TechNation) reads pretty much all of the books for the people she interviews; it doesn&#039;t seem to have done her much harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Moira Gunn (of TechNation) reads pretty much all of the books for the people she interviews; it doesn&#8217;t seem to have done her much harm.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bérubé</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/comment-page-1/#comment-212934</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bérubé</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 05:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/2007/10/04/the-podcast-times/#comment-212934</guid>
		<description>That was really nasty of Gitlin to suggest you&#039;d read his book.  I mean, c&#039;mon -- he knows his way around American journamalism, he knows the drill -- he knew perfectly well that this would be your death knell for Chris Matthews&#039; party circuit.

All the same, your ante-antepenultimate paragraph is a marvelous thing:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Ten years ago, state recognition of civil unions (let alone marriage) between same-sex couples was not really part of the public debate. Today, however, it is. The Republican party has to spend a considerable part of its energy defending the principle that the right to get drunk in Vegas and have a wedding must be restricted to a specific configuration of participants. This makes them look kind of silly to a lot of people, including some Republicans.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To get the full effect of this little graf, I think, you have to read it aloud -- the first two and a half sentences in the voice of the late Richard Rorty, the rest (beginning with &quot;the right to get drunk&quot;) in the voice of Lewis Black.  A cross between Richard Rorty and Lewis Black:  I have no higher praise in my lexicon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That was really nasty of Gitlin to suggest you&#8217;d read his book.  I mean, c&#8217;mon&#8212;he knows his way around American journamalism, he knows the drill&#8212;he knew perfectly well that this would be your death knell for Chris Matthews&#8217; party circuit.</p>

	<p>All the same, your ante-antepenultimate paragraph is a marvelous thing:</p>

	<p><blockquote>Ten years ago, state recognition of civil unions (let alone marriage) between same-sex couples was not really part of the public debate. Today, however, it is. The Republican party has to spend a considerable part of its energy defending the principle that the right to get drunk in Vegas and have a wedding must be restricted to a specific configuration of participants. This makes them look kind of silly to a lot of people, including some Republicans.</blockquote></p>

	<p>To get the full effect of this little graf, I think, you have to read it aloud&#8212;the first two and a half sentences in the voice of the late Richard Rorty, the rest (beginning with &#8220;the right to get drunk&#8221;) in the voice of Lewis Black.  A cross between Richard Rorty and Lewis Black:  I have no higher praise in my lexicon.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
