<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Olympics coverage in the U.S. sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:19:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oana</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249566</link>
		<dc:creator>Oana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249566</guid>
		<description>This is the first year I can say I am very dissapointed.  I am surprised that some of the most popular (or so I thought) sports, like gymnastics, has so little coverage, and the coverage it has, is limited to China and the United States.  This is not the China/USA olympics.  Other countries have done well, and are more interesting to watch/follow.  I&#039;d much rather watch a speed version of all athletes doing craft then watch Alicia Sacramone and the rest of the US team step out of bounds, release too late, wobble on the balance beam.  What a dissapointing year in coverage this has been.  Please play Phelps as much as you can, I can at least &quot;see&quot; the other countries, even if they are 10 paces behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This is the first year I can say I am very dissapointed.  I am surprised that some of the most popular (or so I thought) sports, like gymnastics, has so little coverage, and the coverage it has, is limited to China and the United States.  This is not the China/USA olympics.  Other countries have done well, and are more interesting to watch/follow.  I&#8217;d much rather watch a speed version of all athletes doing craft then watch Alicia Sacramone and the rest of the US team step out of bounds, release too late, wobble on the balance beam.  What a dissapointing year in coverage this has been.  Please play Phelps as much as you can, I can at least &#8220;see&#8221; the other countries, even if they are 10 paces behind.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249560</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249560</guid>
		<description>Thank you for saying NBC&#039;s Olympics coverage sucks.  They seem to think the only things worth broadcasting are things with water, bikinis, or women&#039;s gymnastics.  Thus the coverage of swimming, synch diving, and beach volley.  Face it, I can watch Baywatch reruns and get pretty much the same visuals.  Of course they show women&#039;s gymnastics because everybody loves that once every four years.

By the way, I would LOVE to see a medal ceremony -- I&#039;d love to hear the US National Anthem and watch the flags and the athletes on the podiums, but NBC doesn&#039;t seem to show that, either.  I guess it&#039;s more important to have the bizarre United Airlines commercial or Bob Costas prattle on about something....

It&#039;d be nice to see some variety -- different sports and different countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you for saying <span class="caps">NBC</span>&#8217;s Olympics coverage sucks.  They seem to think the only things worth broadcasting are things with water, bikinis, or women&#8217;s gymnastics.  Thus the coverage of swimming, synch diving, and beach volley.  Face it, I can watch Baywatch reruns and get pretty much the same visuals.  Of course they show women&#8217;s gymnastics because everybody loves that once every four years.</p>

	<p>By the way, I would <span class="caps">LOVE</span> to see a medal ceremony&#8212;I&#8217;d love to hear the <span class="caps">US </span>National Anthem and watch the flags and the athletes on the podiums, but <span class="caps">NBC</span> doesn&#8217;t seem to show that, either.  I guess it&#8217;s more important to have the bizarre United Airlines commercial or Bob Costas prattle on about something&#8230;.</p>

	<p>It&#8217;d be nice to see some variety&#8212;different sports and different countries.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249478</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249478</guid>
		<description>I have always liked watching the shooting sports and archery but  I can never see them because they are shown at 2 AM on a work day. I also am tired of hearing the announcers trash the other countries. I have friends from other countries and we watch the games together. It makes me ashamed to be an American when they are bashing tiny countries that only have one or two people representing them.  I don&#039;t think this is what the games are about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have always liked watching the shooting sports and archery but  I can never see them because they are shown at 2 AM on a work day. I also am tired of hearing the announcers trash the other countries. I have friends from other countries and we watch the games together. It makes me ashamed to be an American when they are bashing tiny countries that only have one or two people representing them.  I don&#8217;t think this is what the games are about.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yanno Roseau</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249454</link>
		<dc:creator>Yanno Roseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249454</guid>
		<description>Not only does the coverage leave out other countries, it starts in PRIME TIME with some of the most boring sports ever: Synchronized diving and then beach volleyball.  I would prefer seeing the swimming, gymnastics and anything else at 8 pm - 10 pm then putting on the other stuff late night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Not only does the coverage leave out other countries, it starts in <span class="caps">PRIME TIME</span> with some of the most boring sports ever: Synchronized diving and then beach volleyball.  I would prefer seeing the swimming, gymnastics and anything else at 8 pm &#8211; 10 pm then putting on the other stuff late night.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249446</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249446</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Bernard. Onward and upward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks, Bernard. Onward and upward.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Yomtov</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249441</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Yomtov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249441</guid>
		<description>My apologies to CT posters, readers, and commenters (all but one) for my outburst.

Provocation aside, it was rude to the community and uncalled for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My apologies to CT posters, readers, and commenters (all but one) for my outburst.</p>

	<p>Provocation aside, it was rude to the community and uncalled for.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blitzzion</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249412</link>
		<dc:creator>Blitzzion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249412</guid>
		<description>swimming ,volleyball  iv seen these events so much in the last 4 days to last me the next few years , Cmon now play some other events already there was NO JUDO Coverage ZeRo ZIP Zilch archery HAH! .
Getting fed up with the same 3 events</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>swimming ,volleyball  iv seen these events so much in the last 4 days to last me the next few years , Cmon now play some other events already there was <span class="caps">NO JUDO </span>Coverage ZeRo <span class="caps">ZIP </span>Zilch archery <span class="caps">HAH</span>! .<br />
Getting fed up with the same 3 events</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Locksley</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249400</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Locksley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249400</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 changes the equation a bit, I think. It, of course, allows people to customize their viewing based on their preferences and their schedules. But also, blogs, youtube and wikis reach niche audiences (such as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://anjaliforberpratt.com/content/about&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;paralympics audience&lt;/a&gt;) which thanks to their geographical dispersion have never before been reached so effectively. The coverage on NBC Olympics&#039;s website is quite extensive, and the technology (Microsoft Silverlight) on there has delivered - at least for me thus far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Web 2.0 changes the equation a bit, I think. It, of course, allows people to customize their viewing based on their preferences and their schedules. But also, blogs, youtube and wikis reach niche audiences (such as the <a href="http://anjaliforberpratt.com/content/about" rel="nofollow">paralympics audience</a>) which thanks to their geographical dispersion have never before been reached so effectively. The coverage on <span class="caps">NBC </span>Olympics&#8217;s website is quite extensive, and the technology (Microsoft Silverlight) on there has delivered &#8211; at least for me thus far.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SSReporters</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249338</link>
		<dc:creator>SSReporters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249338</guid>
		<description>Dr ngo


You get all these sports, you can watch it, but the commentary is amateurish and the broadcast overall is poor, that&#039;s the problem.


And NBC, who went out of their way to buy up the rights to everything, put less coverage on the main network and more on CNBC and so on, and not everyone has cable.


CBC is doing a great job, and NBC should learn from them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dr ngo</p>


	<p>You get all these sports, you can watch it, but the commentary is amateurish and the broadcast overall is poor, that&#8217;s the problem.</p>


	<p>And <span class="caps">NBC</span>, who went out of their way to buy up the rights to everything, put less coverage on the main network and more on <span class="caps">CNBC</span> and so on, and not everyone has cable.</p>


	<p><span class="caps">CBC</span> is doing a great job, and <span class="caps">NBC</span> should learn from them.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr ngo</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249333</link>
		<dc:creator>dr ngo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249333</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;
Why do people here in the US accept NBC to broadcast the Olympics with a delay up to 2 hours, and still call it LIVE??
I have been following swimming and could read about Michael Phelps achievements in newspapers all over the country about two hours before it was sent live on NBC
well… unless someone voice their oppinion this is what we get&lt;/i&gt;

I believe that the only times NBC specifies that an event is &quot;live,&quot; it actually is, which for swimming has been at 10 PM EDT, which is 10 AM Chinese time.  (They paid millions to arrange that - there&#039;s a legitimate source for complaint, especially if you&#039;re Australian.)

Most other stuff is taped, and is tacitly acknowledged as such.  (I.e., if it doesn&#039;t say &quot;live,&quot; it&#039;s probably taped.)  You can usually figure it out if you calculate time zones, which is relatively easy this time around for those of us in the Eastern USA.  If they&#039;re showing anything in the afternoon (here) it&#039;s after midnight in Beijing, hence almost certainly taped.  If you&#039;re watching at 3AM, you may well be watching events as they happen.   Primetime is a mix of &quot;LIVE&quot; - labelled as such - and unlabelled same-day coverage.  You just need to be alert.

(I&#039;ve mentioned before that my personal gripe is that all of the track and field - the Real Olympics - will be at night in Beijing, hence in the AM here, but not showed until about *twelve* hours later by NBC.  AAAAAAGGGGGGHHHH.  But that&#039;s just bloody-mindedness, and the inability of NBC to &quot;buy&quot; track [as they did swimming], not overt deception.)

So far I&#039;m not aware of any outright deception on this score.  If you have evidence to the contrary, I&#039;d be interested in seeing it.  And if you actually knew the result of last nights 4x100 freestyle relay (Phelps&#039; second gold) two hours before it happened, you could have made a fortune!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i><br />
Why do people here in the US accept <span class="caps">NBC</span> to broadcast the Olympics with a delay up to 2 hours, and still call it <span class="caps">LIVE</span>??<br />
I have been following swimming and could read about Michael Phelps achievements in newspapers all over the country about two hours before it was sent live on <span class="caps">NBC</span><br />
well&#8230; unless someone voice their oppinion this is what we get</i></p>

	<p>I believe that the only times <span class="caps">NBC</span> specifies that an event is &#8220;live,&#8221; it actually is, which for swimming has been at 10 <span class="caps">PM EDT</span>, which is 10 <span class="caps">AM </span>Chinese time.  (They paid millions to arrange that &#8211; there&#8217;s a legitimate source for complaint, especially if you&#8217;re Australian.)</p>

	<p>Most other stuff is taped, and is tacitly acknowledged as such.  (I.e., if it doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;live,&#8221; it&#8217;s probably taped.)  You can usually figure it out if you calculate time zones, which is relatively easy this time around for those of us in the Eastern <span class="caps">USA</span>.  If they&#8217;re showing anything in the afternoon (here) it&#8217;s after midnight in Beijing, hence almost certainly taped.  If you&#8217;re watching at 3AM, you may well be watching events as they happen.   Primetime is a mix of &#8220;LIVE&#8221; &#8211; labelled as such &#8211; and unlabelled same-day coverage.  You just need to be alert.</p>

	<p>(I&#8217;ve mentioned before that my personal gripe is that all of the track and field &#8211; the Real Olympics &#8211; will be at night in Beijing, hence in the AM here, but not showed until about <strong>twelve</strong> hours later by <span class="caps">NBC</span>.  <span class="caps">AAAAAAGGGGGGHHHH</span>.  But that&#8217;s just bloody-mindedness, and the inability of <span class="caps">NBC</span> to &#8220;buy&#8221; track [as they did swimming], not overt deception.)</p>

	<p>So far I&#8217;m not aware of any outright deception on this score.  If you have evidence to the contrary, I&#8217;d be interested in seeing it.  And if you actually knew the result of last nights 4&#215;100 freestyle relay (Phelps&#8217; second gold) two hours before it happened, you could have made a fortune<img src="!" alt="" border="0" /></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Yomtov</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249331</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Yomtov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249331</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Walt, where is my insult exactly? The “shallow” comment? Shallow means “lacking intellectual depth, superficial” and “curiosity” means “desire for knowledge for something.” If somebody makes a statement that he/she doesn’t want to learn new things because it requires efforts (learn a different language to enjoy a particular play or learn the rules of a particular game) and because it’s not something he/she is grown up with, that statement implies to me a lack of desire for knowledge.&lt;/i&gt;

Apparently, you don&#039;t understand the simple idea that we all have limited time, and that being unwilling to spend some of it learning about X does not mean one is incurious or shallow or anything else. It means one would prefer to spend time on some other activity, which might even be learning about  Y. 

I think &quot;passive-aggressive&quot; is probably a good description. &quot;I&#039;m not insulting you. I&#039;m just saying you&#039;re shallow and incurious and lack intellectual depth.&quot; No insult at all.

Now I&#039;m tired of this. You decided to insult me based on some vague experiences you had with some other people. Now you claim that it wasn&#039;t an insult, even though it was a plainly negative statement  and you have no sensible basis for it.

To hell with you, Agithehun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Walt, where is my insult exactly? The &#8220;shallow&#8221; comment? Shallow means &#8220;lacking intellectual depth, superficial&#8221; and &#8220;curiosity&#8221; means &#8220;desire for knowledge for something.&#8221; If somebody makes a statement that he/she doesn&#8217;t want to learn new things because it requires efforts (learn a different language to enjoy a particular play or learn the rules of a particular game) and because it&#8217;s not something he/she is grown up with, that statement implies to me a lack of desire for knowledge.</i></p>

	<p>Apparently, you don&#8217;t understand the simple idea that we all have limited time, and that being unwilling to spend some of it learning about X does not mean one is incurious or shallow or anything else. It means one would prefer to spend time on some other activity, which might even be learning about  Y.</p>

	<p>I think &#8220;passive-aggressive&#8221; is probably a good description. &#8220;I&#8217;m not insulting you. I&#8217;m just saying you&#8217;re shallow and incurious and lack intellectual depth.&#8221; No insult at all.</p>

	<p>Now I&#8217;m tired of this. You decided to insult me based on some vague experiences you had with some other people. Now you claim that it wasn&#8217;t an insult, even though it was a plainly negative statement  and you have no sensible basis for it.</p>

	<p>To hell with you, Agithehun.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr ngo</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249329</link>
		<dc:creator>dr ngo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249329</guid>
		<description>I was out this morning, so I set up to tape one of the subsidiary channel&#039;s Olympic coverage, with no idea of what would be on it.

It included about an hour of team handball (Germany vs. S. Korea) and another hour of women&#039;s volleyball (China vs. Poland).  No American teams; live coverage (I think); one brief interruption to announce an American gold medal in some other sport (shooting?); i.e., none of the nationalistic/sentimental crap so many commentators are complaining about.

Why can&#039;t people understand - it&#039;s been said often enough here, and not just by me - that &lt;b&gt;NBC&lt;/b&gt; coverage of the Games is not identical with &lt;b&gt;American&lt;/b&gt; coverage, supposedly the subject of this thread???

It&#039;s perfectly legitimate to complain about NBC coverage, which is clearly designed to be sports for people who don&#039;t really care that much about sports.  (Though whoever suggested it would be better under ABC needs some sense of cultural history - it was ABC who &lt;i&gt;invented&lt;/i&gt; &quot;up close and personal&quot; coverage of the Olympics, Back In The Day.)  

It&#039;s also OK to complain that NBC is all you can access, if you can&#039;t afford cable.  There&#039;s capitalism for you, and perhaps - or perhaps not - an argument in favor of a national television &quot;service.&quot;

But to claim that the US &quot;doesn&#039;t show&quot; all the other sports, just because you can&#039;t access (or can&#039;t be bothered to access) any of the other channels that are *not* NBC, is just plain ignorant.  Or the product of knee-jerk anti-Americanism.  (Which is also just plain ignorant.)

For the record, I&#039;m an all-purpose sports fan.  If it moves and they keep score, I&#039;ll watch it.  I&#039;ve seen Gary Sobers hit a century at Lord&#039;s and Greg Chappell at the SCG.  I watch the European Cup as well as the Ryder Cup and the Super Bowl and the Final Four and Wimbledon and - when I can see it - Seven Nations rugby and Australian Rules Football.   None of this makes me any more virtuous than if I had become an expert on Science Fiction or tapestry-weaving.  It&#039;s just what floats my boat.

What does &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; impress me is self-righteousness, especially of the nationalistic variety,  based on patterns of sports watching.

Of course that&#039;s just my observation.   ;}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was out this morning, so I set up to tape one of the subsidiary channel&#8217;s Olympic coverage, with no idea of what would be on it.</p>

	<p>It included about an hour of team handball (Germany vs. S. Korea) and another hour of women&#8217;s volleyball (China vs. Poland).  No American teams; live coverage (I think); one brief interruption to announce an American gold medal in some other sport (shooting?); i.e., none of the nationalistic/sentimental crap so many commentators are complaining about.</p>

	<p>Why can&#8217;t people understand &#8211; it&#8217;s been said often enough here, and not just by me &#8211; that <b><span class="caps">NBC</span></b> coverage of the Games is not identical with <b>American</b> coverage, supposedly the subject of this thread???</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s perfectly legitimate to complain about <span class="caps">NBC</span> coverage, which is clearly designed to be sports for people who don&#8217;t really care that much about sports.  (Though whoever suggested it would be better under <span class="caps">ABC</span> needs some sense of cultural history &#8211; it was <span class="caps">ABC</span> who <i>invented</i> &#8220;up close and personal&#8221; coverage of the Olympics, Back In The Day.)</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s also OK to complain that <span class="caps">NBC</span> is all you can access, if you can&#8217;t afford cable.  There&#8217;s capitalism for you, and perhaps &#8211; or perhaps not &#8211; an argument in favor of a national television &#8220;service.&#8221;</p>

	<p>But to claim that the <span class="caps">US </span>&#8220;doesn&#8217;t show&#8221; all the other sports, just because you can&#8217;t access (or can&#8217;t be bothered to access) any of the other channels that are <strong>not</strong> NBC, is just plain ignorant.  Or the product of knee-jerk anti-Americanism.  (Which is also just plain ignorant.)</p>

	<p>For the record, I&#8217;m an all-purpose sports fan.  If it moves and they keep score, I&#8217;ll watch it.  I&#8217;ve seen Gary Sobers hit a century at Lord&#8217;s and Greg Chappell at the <span class="caps">SCG</span>.  I watch the European Cup as well as the Ryder Cup and the Super Bowl and the Final Four and Wimbledon and &#8211; when I can see it &#8211; Seven Nations rugby and Australian Rules Football.   None of this makes me any more virtuous than if I had become an expert on Science Fiction or tapestry-weaving.  It&#8217;s just what floats my boat.</p>

	<p>What does <i>not</i> impress me is self-righteousness, especially of the nationalistic variety,  based on patterns of sports watching.</p>

	<p>Of course that&#8217;s just my observation.   ;}</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agithehun</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249328</link>
		<dc:creator>Agithehun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249328</guid>
		<description>Hey Walt! You have a nice dosage of sarcasm, which implies a keen eye for irony, thus intellect :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey Walt! You have a nice dosage of sarcasm, which implies a keen eye for irony, thus intellect :)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agithehun</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249326</link>
		<dc:creator>Agithehun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249326</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it? I&#039;m always right! I&#039;m Hungarian :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Isn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;m always right! I&#8217;m Hungarian :)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2008/08/08/why-olympics-coverage-in-the-us-sucks/comment-page-3/#comment-249325</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=7348#comment-249325</guid>
		<description>Oh I see.  &lt;i&gt;By definition&lt;/i&gt; you are right.  How convenient for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh I see.  <i>By definition</i> you are right.  How convenient for you.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
