<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Side of the Angels symposium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/01/27/on-the-side-of-the-angels-symposium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/01/27/on-the-side-of-the-angels-symposium/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john theibault</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/01/27/on-the-side-of-the-angels-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-264329</link>
		<dc:creator>john theibault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=9288#comment-264329</guid>
		<description>I agree that book symposia are a potentially powerful added-value for academic book reviewing -- especially in light of the closing-down of book review sections in newspapers mentioned in the previous post. The symposium format will undoubtedly work best for the really &quot;big&quot; books with cross-disciplinary appeal. I don&#039;t see them supplanting the book review sections of flagship disciplinary journals like &lt;i&gt; The American Historical Review&lt;/i&gt;, simply because there are so many specialized works that appeal to only a small audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree that book symposia are a potentially powerful added-value for academic book reviewing&#8212;especially in light of the closing-down of book review sections in newspapers mentioned in the previous post. The symposium format will undoubtedly work best for the really &#8220;big&#8221; books with cross-disciplinary appeal. I don&#8217;t see them supplanting the book review sections of flagship disciplinary journals like <i> The American Historical Review</i>, simply because there are so many specialized works that appeal to only a small audience.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 10:44:34 -->
