<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recently released resources on online privacy and security matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-268389</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=9842#comment-268389</guid>
		<description>One problem I think is that the EFF material is mostly useful for organizations. The take-home for individuals seems to be that the only thing you can secure is your hard drive, and then only at considerable cost in terms of potential loss of data. Although it&#039;s not mentioned in any detail, there appears to be no easy way for an individual to combine a data retention strategy with an automatic backup strategy. Or am I displaying my lack of technical sophistication here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One problem I think is that the <span class="caps">EFF</span> material is mostly useful for organizations. The take-home for individuals seems to be that the only thing you can secure is your hard drive, and then only at considerable cost in terms of potential loss of data. Although it&#8217;s not mentioned in any detail, there appears to be no easy way for an individual to combine a data retention strategy with an automatic backup strategy. Or am I displaying my lack of technical sophistication here?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-268341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=9842#comment-268341</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also possible that since the issue is self-protection rather than a public discussion with the aim to make the government reconsider (which it won&#039;t), most people would take the view that you either do it (protect yourself) or don&#039;t. Kind of end of discussion - you take your chances. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s also possible that since the issue is self-protection rather than a public discussion with the aim to make the government reconsider (which it won&#8217;t), most people would take the view that you either do it (protect yourself) or don&#8217;t. Kind of end of discussion &#8211; you take your chances. :)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eszter Hargittai</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-268272</link>
		<dc:creator>Eszter Hargittai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=9842#comment-268272</guid>
		<description>Greensmile - good point/question.  I think the issue may * seem * too technical for those who don&#039;t know the area even though both of these documents are rather accessible.  It may also be that people don&#039;t realize how they are relevant for their own online behavior.  As for the technically savvy, perhaps they assume - incorrectly, if they do - that everyone already knows this already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Greensmile &#8211; good point/question.  I think the issue may * seem * too technical for those who don&#8217;t know the area even though both of these documents are rather accessible.  It may also be that people don&#8217;t realize how they are relevant for their own online behavior.  As for the technically savvy, perhaps they assume &#8211; incorrectly, if they do &#8211; that everyone already knows this already.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greensmile</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-268258</link>
		<dc:creator>greensmile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=9842#comment-268258</guid>
		<description>both stories made it on to slashdot this afternoon...with relatively little comment.  
I don&#039;t know whether its a matter of too many who trust government to respect their freedoms  so much that they are not concerned enough to comment...or the issue is too technical for the politically energized and too political for the technically savvy.

I am certainly going to read both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>both stories made it on to slashdot this afternoon&#8230;with relatively little comment.<br />
I don&#8217;t know whether its a matter of too many who trust government to respect their freedoms  so much that they are not concerned enough to comment&#8230;or the issue is too technical for the politically energized and too political for the technically savvy.</p>

	<p>I am certainly going to read both.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacob</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/05/recently-released-resources-on-online-privacy-and-security-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-268233</link>
		<dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=9842#comment-268233</guid>
		<description>As someone who worked on online privacy issues long enough ago that most of my knowledge is now obsolete (i.e. in the late &#039;90s), I know how hard it is to explain the intricacies of privacy and data protection laws to a non-specialist audience.  That EFF site is really quite excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As someone who worked on online privacy issues long enough ago that most of my knowledge is now obsolete (i.e. in the late &#8216;90s), I know how hard it is to explain the intricacies of privacy and data protection laws to a non-specialist audience.  That <span class="caps">EFF</span> site is really quite excellent.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
