<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do y&#8217;all comment on and why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sharon</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270895</link>
		<dc:creator>sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270895</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://acephalous.typepad.com/acephalous/2007/05/cue_blogwide_st.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Threatening to go on strike&lt;/a&gt; can be remarkably effective too. Although a bit drastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://acephalous.typepad.com/acephalous/2007/05/cue_blogwide_st.html" rel="nofollow">Threatening to go on strike</a> can be remarkably effective too. Although a bit drastic.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Danby</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270866</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Danby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270866</guid>
		<description>This bit of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;troll-bait&lt;/a&gt; is almost at 1700.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This bit of <a href="http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/" title="" rel="nofollow">troll-bait</a> is almost at 1700.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270862</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270862</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Is Obama the AntiChrist?”&lt;/blockquote&gt;Was this solved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><blockquote>&#8220;Is Obama the AntiChrist?&#8221;</blockquote>Was this solved?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John  Emerson</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270861</link>
		<dc:creator>John  Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270861</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is Obama the AntiChrist?&quot; was going strong after 6-7 years an 6,000 comments and only expired because  Apostopher shut it down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;Is Obama the AntiChrist?&#8221; was going strong after 6-7 years an 6,000 comments and only expired because  Apostopher shut it down.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novakant</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270860</link>
		<dc:creator>novakant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270860</guid>
		<description>PC vs MAC is a sure winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>PC vs <span class="caps">MAC</span> is a sure winner.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salient</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270840</link>
		<dc:creator>salient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Acquiring one tenacious individual who is Wrong On The Internet helps.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, this (when allowing for &quot;more than one&quot; as well) is probably the sole ticket to a post with substantial activity past 48 hours &amp; more than a couple hundred comments.

It would be interesting to find a metric that allows us to compare &quot;number of comments&quot; to &quot;quality of on-topic discussion, in terms of information exchanged and satisfaction of involved parties.&quot; I imagine there&#039;s a maximum that&#039;s less than 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Acquiring one tenacious individual who is Wrong On The Internet helps.</i></p>

	<p>Actually, this (when allowing for &#8220;more than one&#8221; as well) is probably the sole ticket to a post with substantial activity past 48 hours &#038; more than a couple hundred comments.</p>

	<p>It would be interesting to find a metric that allows us to compare &#8220;number of comments&#8221; to &#8220;quality of on-topic discussion, in terms of information exchanged and satisfaction of involved parties.&#8221; I imagine there&#8217;s a maximum that&#8217;s less than 100.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Righteous Bubba</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270835</link>
		<dc:creator>Righteous Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270835</guid>
		<description>Acquiring one tenacious individual who is Wrong On The Internet helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Acquiring one tenacious individual who is Wrong On The Internet helps.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salient</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270834</link>
		<dc:creator>salient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270834</guid>
		<description>As suggested by ``world is flat&#039;&#039; receiving twice the number of comments in evidence here, perhaps the way to rack up large numbers of &lt;i&gt;comments&lt;/i&gt; over time is to post something that is likely to provoke a long multi-day residual discussion between a few interested parties, which everyone else is likely to ignore after a while.

# of commenters &lt; # of comments, in most nontrivial cases, and the discrepancy between these numbers can tell you a lot about the thread, probably in turn correlating strongly with the type of post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As suggested by &#8220;world is flat&#8217;&#8217; receiving twice the number of comments in evidence here, perhaps the way to rack up large numbers of <i>comments</i> over time is to post something that is likely to provoke a long multi-day residual discussion between a few interested parties, which everyone else is likely to ignore after a while.</p>

	<ol>
		<li>of commenters < # of comments, in most nontrivial cases, and the discrepancy between these numbers can tell you a lot about the thread, probably in turn correlating strongly with the type of post.</li>
	</li></ol>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Puchalsky</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270744</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Puchalsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270744</guid>
		<description>Threads that go meta and start to refer to the number of comments in the thread, especially with a goal (as in &quot;let&#039;s see if we can get to 150&quot;) get a lot of comments.  But only if there are already a lot of comments in the thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Threads that go meta and start to refer to the number of comments in the thread, especially with a goal (as in &#8220;let&#8217;s see if we can get to 150&#8221;) get a lot of comments.  But only if there are already a lot of comments in the thread.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahistoricality</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270740</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahistoricality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270740</guid>
		<description>Best way to get comments &lt;i&gt;and&lt;/i&gt; links? 

Declare the &quot;END OF&quot; something. Books, teaching, good television, bad doctors, an era, and epoch, a school of thought, a social pattern, a word, a meme, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Best way to get comments <i>and</i> links?</p>

	<p>Declare the &#8220;END OF&#8221; something. Books, teaching, good television, bad doctors, an era, and epoch, a school of thought, a social pattern, a word, a meme, etc.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Burke</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270733</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270733</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d add a few patterns.

1) Shorter posts get more comments than longer posts.
2) Posts about the everyday life experiences of the poster get more comments but the comments tend to be very different depending on whether (a) the experience is a snarky, humorous one or (b) is a very serious, emotionally fraught one. (a) tend to create longer threads that bounce from story to story; (b) create long threads that contain short expressions of sympathy.  Corollary: Eventually people stop expressing sympathy if the same poster has frequent experiences of a serious, bad or depressing nature, unless it is Scott Eric Kaufman being attacked once again by random strangers, automobile drivers, people fucking in his office or unsympathetic bureaucrats. But maybe SEK&#039;s experiences are really 2a.
3) Posts which are seriously wrong get more comments. This is something I&#039;ve discovered in teaching, too: a reading that has serious problems or errors (but is nevertheless interesting) is way more compelling to discuss for undergraduates than an impeccable work of scholarship. A post which is wacky, exaggerated, unreasonable, unpleasant or outright psychotic is way more likely to spark comments (as well as get links).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;d add a few patterns.</p>

	<p>1) Shorter posts get more comments than longer posts.<br />
2) Posts about the everyday life experiences of the poster get more comments but the comments tend to be very different depending on whether (a) the experience is a snarky, humorous one or (b) is a very serious, emotionally fraught one. (a) tend to create longer threads that bounce from story to story; (b) create long threads that contain short expressions of sympathy.  Corollary: Eventually people stop expressing sympathy if the same poster has frequent experiences of a serious, bad or depressing nature, unless it is Scott Eric Kaufman being attacked once again by random strangers, automobile drivers, people fucking in his office or unsympathetic bureaucrats. But maybe <span class="caps">SEK</span>&#8217;s experiences are really 2a.<br />
3) Posts which are seriously wrong get more comments. This is something I&#8217;ve discovered in teaching, too: a reading that has serious problems or errors (but is nevertheless interesting) is way more compelling to discuss for undergraduates than an impeccable work of scholarship. A post which is wacky, exaggerated, unreasonable, unpleasant or outright psychotic is way more likely to spark comments (as well as get links).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eszter</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270726</link>
		<dc:creator>Eszter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270726</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Wasn’t the Emerson Effect exactly what NASA was looking for when it got Colbert instead?&lt;/i&gt;

The NASA/Colbert thing was the second (3rd, 4th?) time he did something of this sort. The most memorable for me was the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=132&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hungarian bridge naming incident&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Wasn&#8217;t the Emerson Effect exactly what <span class="caps">NASA</span> was looking for when it got Colbert instead?</i></p>

	<p>The <span class="caps">NASA</span>/Colbert thing was the second (3rd, 4th?) time he did something of this sort. The most memorable for me was the <a href="http://www.nofactzone.net/?p=132" rel="nofollow">Hungarian bridge naming incident</a>.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garymar</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270712</link>
		<dc:creator>garymar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270712</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another comment for y&#039;all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Here&#8217;s another comment for y&#8217;all.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad Jim</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270710</link>
		<dc:creator>bad Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270710</guid>
		<description>Comment tally views?
&lt;em&gt;Comment tallez vous?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Comment tally views?<br />
<em>Comment tallez vous?</em></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsquared</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/03/25/what-do-yall-comment-on-and-why/comment-page-3/#comment-270674</link>
		<dc:creator>dsquared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10202#comment-270674</guid>
		<description>As a onetime associate of adequacy.org, I can confirm that the single comment-attractingest topic is the inferiority of AMD computer chips to Intel ones, and the general association of AMD chips with computer crime.  It attracted over 9000 comments before we closed down the site.  Even mentioning it this low down on a comments thread is a risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As a onetime associate of adequacy.org, I can confirm that the single comment-attractingest topic is the inferiority of <span class="caps">AMD</span> computer chips to Intel ones, and the general association of <span class="caps">AMD</span> chips with computer crime.  It attracted over 9000 comments before we closed down the site.  Even mentioning it this low down on a comments thread is a risk.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
