<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Conservatives as Closet Gramscians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/04/29/legal-conservatives-as-closet-gramscians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/04/29/legal-conservatives-as-closet-gramscians/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:47:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kmcg</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/04/29/legal-conservatives-as-closet-gramscians/comment-page-1/#comment-274384</link>
		<dc:creator>kmcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10892#comment-274384</guid>
		<description>I agree with mcd, you are construing &quot;hegemonic&quot; too narrowly here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with mcd, you are construing &#8220;hegemonic&#8221; too narrowly here.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcd</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/04/29/legal-conservatives-as-closet-gramscians/comment-page-1/#comment-274044</link>
		<dc:creator>mcd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 04:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=10892#comment-274044</guid>
		<description>The &quot;conservative movement&quot; wasn&#039;t counter-hegemonic. It represented the big money interests of society. The question is  why, after 1970, business, which had been willing to entertain &quot;business liberalism&quot; since the New Deal, suddenly lost all tolerance for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The &#8220;conservative movement&#8221; wasn&#8217;t counter-hegemonic. It represented the big money interests of society. The question is  why, after 1970, business, which had been willing to entertain &#8220;business liberalism&#8221; since the New Deal, suddenly lost all tolerance for it.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
