<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annual Top Shelf $3 Sale Post Plus Burn Your Book Jackets!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus McQueen</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/comment-page-1/#comment-288364</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus McQueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=12956#comment-288364</guid>
		<description>Given what Tschichold thought of dust jackets, you can imagine his contempt for the mylar covers that are pretty much &lt;i&gt;de rigueur&lt;/i&gt; for intact djs on collectible books these days. A &lt;a href=&quot;http://store.artlebedev.com/books/design/oblik-knigi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Russian edition of &lt;i&gt;The Form of the Book&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has recently been published, which is very handsome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Given what Tschichold thought of dust jackets, you can imagine his contempt for the mylar covers that are pretty much <i>de rigueur</i> for intact djs on collectible books these days. A <a href="http://store.artlebedev.com/books/design/oblik-knigi/" rel="nofollow">Russian edition of <i>The Form of the Book</i></a> has recently been published, which is very handsome.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minnesotaj</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/comment-page-1/#comment-288352</link>
		<dc:creator>minnesotaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=12956#comment-288352</guid>
		<description>...didn&#039;t Tschichold also disdain the hardcover book, per se? I think you could find a sentence to that effect in either &lt;em&gt;The Form of the Book&lt;/em&gt; or &lt;em&gt;The New Typography&lt;/em&gt;. A random selection of a 1960s Gallimard paperback and any one of the &quot;handsome&quot; hardcover volumes at your local bookseller might incline you to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8230;didn&#8217;t Tschichold also disdain the hardcover book, per se? I think you could find a sentence to that effect in either <em>The Form of the Book</em> or <em>The New Typography</em>. A random selection of a 1960s Gallimard paperback and any one of the &#8220;handsome&#8221; hardcover volumes at your local bookseller might incline you to agree.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/comment-page-1/#comment-288350</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=12956#comment-288350</guid>
		<description>Dust jackets are important to modern first editions because they&#039;re something else that can go wrong, basically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dust jackets are important to modern first editions because they&#8217;re something else that can go wrong, basically.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloix</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/comment-page-1/#comment-288346</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=12956#comment-288346</guid>
		<description>From http://www.baumanrarebooks.com/rare-book-collecting/frequently-asked-questions.aspx

WHY IS THE DUST JACKET SO IMPORTANT TO MODERN FIRST EDITIONS?
Dust jackets or dust wrappers were originally designed to protect a book in transit—just until it reached the safety of an owner’s library. The first recorded use of a dust jacket goes back as far as the mid-nineteenth century, but they were generally discarded after serving their initial purpose. Very few early jackets survive.

In the early twentieth century, however, dust jackets developed from simple coverings to art forms and promotional aids that became integral to the book. Because collectors of modern first editions generally prefer a copy as close as possible to the first appearance of the book in every way, most prefer a dust jacket when obtainable. Some dust jackets are exceptionally scarce, such as those of The Great Gatsby and The Sun Also Rises.

Condition of the dust jacket is key to the value, just as it is in books. Since they are made of paper, they are extremely fragile. Though no longer designed only for protection, dust jackets are the book’s first defense against sunlight, humidity, handling, dust, and other stresses. Naturally, they can show substantial wear: chipping, fading, darkening, staining and tears. They are still often discarded, and many are more fragile and prone to wear than others. For example, they may be light colored and show soiling quite easily, or made of a particularly fragile paper and prone to chipping or fading. Just as the difference in value between a modern first edition with a jacket and a copy without one can be considerable, the difference in value between a poor jacket and fine or near-fine jacket can be substantial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>From <a href="http://www.baumanrarebooks.com/rare-book-collecting/frequently-asked-questions.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.baumanrarebooks.com/rare-book-collecting/frequently-asked-questions.aspx</a></p>

	<p><span class="caps">WHY IS THE DUST JACKET SO IMPORTANT TO MODERN FIRST EDITIONS</span>?<br />
Dust jackets or dust wrappers were originally designed to protect a book in transit&#8212;just until it reached the safety of an owner&#8217;s library. The first recorded use of a dust jacket goes back as far as the mid-nineteenth century, but they were generally discarded after serving their initial purpose. Very few early jackets survive.</p>

	<p>In the early twentieth century, however, dust jackets developed from simple coverings to art forms and promotional aids that became integral to the book. Because collectors of modern first editions generally prefer a copy as close as possible to the first appearance of the book in every way, most prefer a dust jacket when obtainable. Some dust jackets are exceptionally scarce, such as those of The Great Gatsby and The Sun Also Rises.</p>

	<p>Condition of the dust jacket is key to the value, just as it is in books. Since they are made of paper, they are extremely fragile. Though no longer designed only for protection, dust jackets are the book&#8217;s first defense against sunlight, humidity, handling, dust, and other stresses. Naturally, they can show substantial wear: chipping, fading, darkening, staining and tears. They are still often discarded, and many are more fragile and prone to wear than others. For example, they may be light colored and show soiling quite easily, or made of a particularly fragile paper and prone to chipping or fading. Just as the difference in value between a modern first edition with a jacket and a copy without one can be considerable, the difference in value between a poor jacket and fine or near-fine jacket can be substantial.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Substance McGravitas</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/comment-page-1/#comment-288343</link>
		<dc:creator>Substance McGravitas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=12956#comment-288343</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t throw out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acmenoveltyarchive.org/category.php?cat=7&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chris Ware book jackets.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You can&#8217;t throw out <a href="http://www.acmenoveltyarchive.org/category.php?cat=7" title="" rel="nofollow">Chris Ware book jackets.</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pilgrimtraveller</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/09/14/annual-top-shelf-3-sale-post-plus-burn-your-book-jackets/comment-page-1/#comment-288341</link>
		<dc:creator>pilgrimtraveller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=12956#comment-288341</guid>
		<description>Jan Tschichold is a hero of mine. His book &quot;Asymmetric Typography&quot;  may be the chief reason why I,  in my mid-50s, am trying to make a ridiculously hard transition to a new vocation. After decades of working as a photographer and a teacher of photography, I have just finished an MFA in Graphic Design, and Tschichold is the major figure in my thesis. Anything he wrote repays careful reading. Once you&#039;ve completed both &quot;The Form of the Book&quot; and &quot;Asymmetric Typography&quot;, read &quot;The New Typography&quot;. Many of the essays in &quot;Form&quot; were written after he had forsaken the avant-gardism of the latter two books. His views changed, but the temperament you note remained the same, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jan Tschichold is a hero of mine. His book &#8220;Asymmetric Typography&#8221;  may be the chief reason why I,  in my mid-50s, am trying to make a ridiculously hard transition to a new vocation. After decades of working as a photographer and a teacher of photography, I have just finished an <span class="caps">MFA</span> in Graphic Design, and Tschichold is the major figure in my thesis. Anything he wrote repays careful reading. Once you&#8217;ve completed both &#8220;The Form of the Book&#8221; and &#8220;Asymmetric Typography&#8221;, read &#8220;The New Typography&#8221;. Many of the essays in &#8220;Form&#8221; were written after he had forsaken the avant-gardism of the latter two books. His views changed, but the temperament you note remained the same, I believe.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

