<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peace, dude</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291325</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291325</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Could not help but notice that the Nobel Peace Prize was not awarded during 1939-1943. &lt;/em&gt;

No, the Gestapo and Sicherheitsdienst were not known for being eager to facilitate demonstrations of liberal internationalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>Could not help but notice that the Nobel Peace Prize was not awarded during 1939-1943. </em></p>

	<p>No, the Gestapo and Sicherheitsdienst were not known for being eager to facilitate demonstrations of liberal internationalism.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: please grow up</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291321</link>
		<dc:creator>please grow up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291321</guid>
		<description>http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/liz-cheney-obama-given-nobel-prize-for-opposing-american-dominance.php?ref=fpblg

&quot;Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Liz Cheney attacked President Obama&#039;s Nobel Peace Prize. &quot;Well, I think what the committee believes is they&#039;d like to live in a world in which America is not dominant. And I think if you look at the language of the citation, you can see that they talk about, you know, President Obama ruling in a way that makes sense to the majority of the people of the world,&quot; said Cheney. &quot;You know, Americans don&#039;t elect a president to do that. We elect a president to defend our national interests. And so I think that, you know, they may believe that President Obama also doesn&#039;t agree with American dominance, and they may have been trying to affirm that belief with the prize. I think, unfortunately, they may be right, and I think it&#039;s a concern.&quot; &quot;

She&#039;s right more or less, even if few of  you  have figured out the obvious.
It&#039;s republicans vs the world, or it should be.  Obama is the best we&#039;re going to get, so give him some credit.  
But to  the degree he&#039;s not what Cheney fears, so much the worse for all of us.

end of lecture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/liz-cheney-obama-given-nobel-prize-for-opposing-american-dominance.php?ref=fpblg" rel="nofollow">http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/liz-cheney-obama-given-nobel-prize-for-opposing-american-dominance.php?ref=fpblg</a></p>

	<p>&#8220;Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Liz Cheney attacked President Obama&#8217;s Nobel Peace Prize. &#8220;Well, I think what the committee believes is they&#8217;d like to live in a world in which America is not dominant. And I think if you look at the language of the citation, you can see that they talk about, you know, President Obama ruling in a way that makes sense to the majority of the people of the world,&#8221; said Cheney. &#8220;You know, Americans don&#8217;t elect a president to do that. We elect a president to defend our national interests. And so I think that, you know, they may believe that President Obama also doesn&#8217;t agree with American dominance, and they may have been trying to affirm that belief with the prize. I think, unfortunately, they may be right, and I think it&#8217;s a concern.&#8221; &#8221;</p>

	<p>She&#8217;s right more or less, even if few of  you  have figured out the obvious.<br />
It&#8217;s republicans vs the world, or it should be.  Obama is the best we&#8217;re going to get, so give him some credit.<br />
But to  the degree he&#8217;s not what Cheney fears, so much the worse for all of us.</p>

	<p>end of lecture</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Bento</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291320</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Bento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291320</guid>
		<description>My initial swallowed comment had a bit of snark about the Nobel Peace Prize for War Crimes. 

Salient, &lt;a&gt;This dailykos diary has a Rachel Maddow clip&lt;/a&gt; wherein she makes the case for Obama&#039;s prize for 11 minutes. The case consists of campaign rhetoric, immediate post-election rhetoric and beating McCain: other than beating McCain, it is all rhetoric, much of it unremarkable in substance (though not delivery) for a liberal and much of it undermined by subsequent actions. Well, OK, he&#039;s taking to Iran. I do not think Maddow is joking. The author of the kos diary said this brought him almost to tears. There is a lot of this around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>My initial swallowed comment had a bit of snark about the Nobel Peace Prize for War Crimes.</p>

	<p>Salient, <a>This dailykos diary has a Rachel Maddow clip</a> wherein she makes the case for Obama&#8217;s prize for 11 minutes. The case consists of campaign rhetoric, immediate post-election rhetoric and beating McCain: other than beating McCain, it is all rhetoric, much of it unremarkable in substance (though not delivery) for a liberal and much of it undermined by subsequent actions. Well, OK, he&#8217;s taking to Iran. I do not think Maddow is joking. The author of the kos diary said this brought him almost to tears. There is a lot of this around.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venus</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291319</link>
		<dc:creator>Venus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291319</guid>
		<description>Or as a comment I read on Pandalous mentions ( http://www.pandalous.com/topic/the_nobel_committee_and ), he should share his prize with Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Or as a comment I read on Pandalous mentions ( <a href="http://www.pandalous.com/topic/the_nobel_committee_and" rel="nofollow">http://www.pandalous.com/topic/the_nobel_committee_and</a> ), he should share his prize with Bush.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salient</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291297</link>
		<dc:creator>Salient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291297</guid>
		<description>Cardinal sins against grammar aside, Alan Grayson somehow pre-emptively nailed this:

&lt;blockquote&gt;America understands that there&#039;s one party in this country that&#039;s in favor of health care reform, and one party that&#039;s against it, and they know why. They understand that if Barack Obama were somehow able to cure hunger in the world, Republicans would blame him for overpopulation. &lt;b&gt;They understand that if Barack Obama could somehow bring about world peace, they&#039;d  blame him for destroying the defense industry.&lt;/b&gt; In fact, they understand that if Barack Obama has a BLT sandwich tomorrow for lunch, they will try to ban bacon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alan Grayson Obliquely Predicts Nobel Peace Prize, Tells Bacon Joke&lt;/a&gt;

And here&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9459P8daPng&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;follow-up&lt;/a&gt;, in which Grayson again expends whatever admiration he had accumulated by wishing for Barack Obama to win another couple Nobel Peace Prizes &lt;i&gt;for Iraq and Afghanistan&lt;/i&gt;.

I wish we lived in a world where this guy was categorically out of line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Cardinal sins against grammar aside, Alan Grayson somehow pre-emptively nailed this:</p>

	<p><blockquote>America understands that there&#8217;s one party in this country that&#8217;s in favor of health care reform, and one party that&#8217;s against it, and they know why. They understand that if Barack Obama were somehow able to cure hunger in the world, Republicans would blame him for overpopulation. <b>They understand that if Barack Obama could somehow bring about world peace, they&#8217;d  blame him for destroying the defense industry.</b> In fact, they understand that if Barack Obama has a <span class="caps">BLT</span> sandwich tomorrow for lunch, they will try to ban bacon.</blockquote></p>

	<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ery7RZ4tZ2Y" rel="nofollow">Alan Grayson Obliquely Predicts Nobel Peace Prize, Tells Bacon Joke</a></p>

	<p>And here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9459P8daPng" rel="nofollow">follow-up</a>, in which Grayson again expends whatever admiration he had accumulated by wishing for Barack Obama to win another couple Nobel Peace Prizes <i>for Iraq and Afghanistan</i>.</p>

	<p>I wish we lived in a world where this guy was categorically out of line&#8230;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salient</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291295</link>
		<dc:creator>Salient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291295</guid>
		<description>Martin:

* Acceptable and probably the consensus opinion, if I have any ability to gauge these things. Actually, I think the consensus privately-held liberal opinion probably vacillates between what you expressed and what akatsuki expressed.

* Nobody &lt;b&gt;seriously&lt;/b&gt; believes Obama deserves the prize for beating McCain; it&#039;s a joke.

* In real life, I have been more critical of this prize award than any hard-line conservative website ever could be (after all, exactly what about escalation of war in the Middle East, continuance of policies which violate human rights and human dignity, and intensified drone attacks on civilians would bother those folks?), but I stand by my jokes here.

* Man, whatever happened to Lincoln Chafee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Martin:</p>

	<ul>
		<li>Acceptable and probably the consensus opinion, if I have any ability to gauge these things. Actually, I think the consensus privately-held liberal opinion probably vacillates between what you expressed and what akatsuki expressed.</li>
	</ul>

	<ul>
		<li>Nobody <b>seriously</b> believes Obama deserves the prize for beating McCain; it&#8217;s a joke.</li>
	</ul>

	<ul>
		<li>In real life, I have been more critical of this prize award than any hard-line conservative website ever could be (after all, exactly what about escalation of war in the Middle East, continuance of policies which violate human rights and human dignity, and intensified drone attacks on civilians would bother those folks?), but I stand by my jokes here.</li>
	</ul>

	<ul>
		<li>Man, whatever happened to Lincoln Chafee?</li>
	</ul>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291294</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 12:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291294</guid>
		<description>epignosis 10.10.09 at 3:19 pm

&quot;    Could not help but notice that the Nobel Peace Prize was not awarded during 1939-1943. Was there no “hope and change” person available. Perhaps it was to the benefit of Norway that some nations remained capable of waging war to purchase freedom for others less capable.
    Perhaps, respectfully, the awarding committee members should be asked their opinions.&quot;

Oh, so you&#039;re a WWII vet?  And if American, one who went to the UK in 1939 or so, volunteering to fight against fascism (i.e., not waiting for two years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>epignosis 10.10.09 at 3:19 pm</p>

	<p>&#8221;    Could not help but notice that the Nobel Peace Prize was not awarded during 1939-1943. Was there no &#8220;hope and change&#8221; person available. Perhaps it was to the benefit of Norway that some nations remained capable of waging war to purchase freedom for others less capable.<br />
Perhaps, respectfully, the awarding committee members should be asked their opinions.&#8221;</p>

	<p>Oh, so you&#8217;re a <span class="caps">WWII</span> vet?  And if American, one who went to the UK in 1939 or so, volunteering to fight against fascism (i.e., not waiting for two years).</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erisian</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291284</link>
		<dc:creator>Erisian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 06:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291284</guid>
		<description>@mars

On the lesser of two evils I&#039;ll take someone who understands war and peace and might have been &quot;caught taking a bribe…&quot; over someone who rolls over for a belly rub from 5 Norwegians and basically looks like he cowers from anyone threatening him with a rolled newspaper.  Besides, pot/kettle wise, ANYONE who came up through the political machine in Chicago has at least an understanding - if not an outright friendship - with corruption in politics.

It&#039;s time to grow up and come back to this planet.  POTUS has done jack squat with his domestic agenda besides bankrupt my great grandchildren and &quot;nationalize&quot; the auto industry and immediately hand ownership over to the UAW. Stimulus package? Viagra or soft core porn are both more stimulating than his $878 billion gift to who knows who (certainly the government doesn&#039;t know).  His attempted gift to the trial lawyers? The big bad insurance industry MUST be put in their place but keep away from tort reform!

Because of the Bush43 administration, the choice of Palin as a running mate, and a few other misadventures on McCain&#039;s part my dead uncle Ernie could have won the election if he was the Democratic nominee.

But, the bottom line is; whether or not you like or agree with Obama, there is no way he has accomplished anywhere near enough of a &quot;portfolio of work&quot; to have truly earned the Peace Prize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@mars</p>

	<p>On the lesser of two evils I&#8217;ll take someone who understands war and peace and might have been &#8220;caught taking a bribe&#8230;&#8221; over someone who rolls over for a belly rub from 5 Norwegians and basically looks like he cowers from anyone threatening him with a rolled newspaper.  Besides, pot/kettle wise, <span class="caps">ANYONE</span> who came up through the political machine in Chicago has at least an understanding &#8211; if not an outright friendship &#8211; with corruption in politics.</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s time to grow up and come back to this planet.  <span class="caps">POTUS</span> has done jack squat with his domestic agenda besides bankrupt my great grandchildren and &#8220;nationalize&#8221; the auto industry and immediately hand ownership over to the <span class="caps">UAW</span>. Stimulus package? Viagra or soft core porn are both more stimulating than his $878 billion gift to who knows who (certainly the government doesn&#8217;t know).  His attempted gift to the trial lawyers? The big bad insurance industry <span class="caps">MUST</span> be put in their place but keep away from tort reform!</p>

	<p>Because of the Bush43 administration, the choice of Palin as a running mate, and a few other misadventures on McCain&#8217;s part my dead uncle Ernie could have won the election if he was the Democratic nominee.</p>

	<p>But, the bottom line is; whether or not you like or agree with Obama, there is no way he has accomplished anywhere near enough of a &#8220;portfolio of work&#8221; to have truly earned the Peace Prize.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mars</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291282</link>
		<dc:creator>mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291282</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;@ Erisian 10.10.09 at 6:35 pm&lt;/i&gt;

Your pal McCain also knows what hell it is to get caught taking a bribe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>@ Erisian 10.10.09 at 6:35 pm</i></p>

	<p>Your pal McCain also knows what hell it is to get caught taking a bribe&#8230;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mars</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291281</link>
		<dc:creator>mars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291281</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;@ Erisian 10.10.09 at 6:35 pm&lt;/i&gt;

Your pal McCain also know what hell it is to get caught taking a bribe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>@ Erisian 10.10.09 at 6:35 pm</i></p>

	<p>Your pal McCain also know what hell it is to get caught taking a bribe&#8230;</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291280</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291280</guid>
		<description>I would argue that the award of the Nobel Prize is perfectly logical. Bear with me as I try and do a behavioral experiment - just as a thought experiment. Supposing you have control of the board. Supposing you were a member of the Nobel Prize committee. Naturally, you felt a certain sense of responsibility about things, but also felt that you had some measure of control over how you would like to see things go moving forward. Now take a look at this website : http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/04/climate_change/html/climate.stm. On the site, you have a slider. You get to move the slider up and down. Isn&#039;t it perfectly logical to say that whereas you don&#039;t know for sure that climate change is going to cause an increase in temperature of 7 degrees, the expected losses from not acting are extremely high (given that the damage function is convex), and so you would rather go with hope, change and the possibility of action? You want to consider the possibility that the world years from now might look like the figure on the right rather than the figure on the left. Is it really illogical to say that you would rather err on the side of caution if the question is one of not letting the climate in Africa get shot to hell and quite simply one of avoiding catastrophe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I would argue that the award of the Nobel Prize is perfectly logical. Bear with me as I try and do a behavioral experiment &#8211; just as a thought experiment. Supposing you have control of the board. Supposing you were a member of the Nobel Prize committee. Naturally, you felt a certain sense of responsibility about things, but also felt that you had some measure of control over how you would like to see things go moving forward. Now take a look at this website : <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/04/climate_change/html/climate.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/04/climate_change/html/climate.stm</a>. On the site, you have a slider. You get to move the slider up and down. Isn&#8217;t it perfectly logical to say that whereas you don&#8217;t know for sure that climate change is going to cause an increase in temperature of 7 degrees, the expected losses from not acting are extremely high (given that the damage function is convex), and so you would rather go with hope, change and the possibility of action? You want to consider the possibility that the world years from now might look like the figure on the right rather than the figure on the left. Is it really illogical to say that you would rather err on the side of caution if the question is one of not letting the climate in Africa get shot to hell and quite simply one of avoiding catastrophe?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lichen</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291265</link>
		<dc:creator>Lichen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291265</guid>
		<description>Well, I have noticed many conservative sites have been happy to proclaim Obama a failure.  (Usually over and over.) 

So, I&#039;m not sure if the claim &quot;too early to make judgements&quot; really holds up on their part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, I have noticed many conservative sites have been happy to proclaim Obama a failure.  (Usually over and over.)</p>

	<p>So, I&#8217;m not sure if the claim &#8220;too early to make judgements&#8221; really holds up on their part.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291262</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291262</guid>
		<description>His acceptance was classy. But you guys are missing the point. They are awarding him the prize now because they can&#039;t be sure of later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>His acceptance was classy. But you guys are missing the point. They are awarding him the prize now because they can&#8217;t be sure of later.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Bento</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291258</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Bento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 21:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291258</guid>
		<description>Could&#039;ve sworn I commented in this thread, but I don&#039;t see it.  Have I been censored, and, if so, why? What I said was that Obama, having generally continued and in some cases furthered Bush&#039;s WOT policies wrt civil liberties, executive power, and due process, certainly does not deserve the prize, but perhaps having gotten it, he will feel pressure to live up to it, particularly if taunted about it when he does not. Is that an unacceptable statement here? 

As for all those who think Obama deserves the prize simply for beating McCain, give me a break. Had Obama not run, Hillary Clinton would be in the White House now, pursuing very similar policies, probably with some of the same staff. She campaigned as well as he did, but didn&#039;t strategize as well and was overconfident early on. Obama significantly underperformed the Democratic average this election, and McCain made serious blunders like suspending his campaign and nominating Palin. It would&#039;ve been very hard for any competent Democrat to lose this election, and Obama probably should have done better.

Besides which, winning the election was his self-interest and his job. Had his opponent been a reasonable Republican like Linc Chafee, he would have campaigned just as hard and rightly so. Johnson didn&#039;t get a Noble for beating Goldwater, nor Humphrey for beating Wallace, nor Edwards for beating Duke, all of whom were worse than McCain. The whole notion is preposterous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Could&#8217;ve sworn I commented in this thread, but I don&#8217;t see it.  Have I been censored, and, if so, why? What I said was that Obama, having generally continued and in some cases furthered Bush&#8217;s <span class="caps">WOT</span> policies wrt civil liberties, executive power, and due process, certainly does not deserve the prize, but perhaps having gotten it, he will feel pressure to live up to it, particularly if taunted about it when he does not. Is that an unacceptable statement here?</p>

	<p>As for all those who think Obama deserves the prize simply for beating McCain, give me a break. Had Obama not run, Hillary Clinton would be in the White House now, pursuing very similar policies, probably with some of the same staff. She campaigned as well as he did, but didn&#8217;t strategize as well and was overconfident early on. Obama significantly underperformed the Democratic average this election, and McCain made serious blunders like suspending his campaign and nominating Palin. It would&#8217;ve been very hard for any competent Democrat to lose this election, and Obama probably should have done better.</p>

	<p>Besides which, winning the election was his self-interest and his job. Had his opponent been a reasonable Republican like Linc Chafee, he would have campaigned just as hard and rightly so. Johnson didn&#8217;t get a Noble for beating Goldwater, nor Humphrey for beating Wallace, nor Edwards for beating Duke, all of whom were worse than McCain. The whole notion is preposterous.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erisian</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/10/09/peace-dude/comment-page-3/#comment-291249</link>
		<dc:creator>Erisian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13274#comment-291249</guid>
		<description>@121 (Mars) and 126 (Jorgen),
Gee, you are both so right.  This man of hope and peace (yeah, right) has kept the bomb out of the hands of someone who actually knows what hell war is, and at the same time does nothing to keep it out of the hands of whacko extremists like Kim of N Korea or Ahmadinejad (sp?).  Now that he has been annointed the prince of Peace (prize) he will sit back while the Taliban get the bomb when they take over Pakistan.

PARITY FOR ALL guarantees nothing but chaos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@121 (Mars) and 126 (Jorgen),<br />
Gee, you are both so right.  This man of hope and peace (yeah, right) has kept the bomb out of the hands of someone who actually knows what hell war is, and at the same time does nothing to keep it out of the hands of whacko extremists like Kim of N Korea or Ahmadinejad (sp?).  Now that he has been annointed the prince of Peace (prize) he will sit back while the Taliban get the bomb when they take over Pakistan.</p>

	<p><span class="caps">PARITY FOR ALL</span> guarantees nothing but chaos!</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.348 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 05:24:56 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
