<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/</link>
	<description>Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Berger</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294985</link>
		<dc:creator>George Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294985</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s an interesting political take on part of this problem in the higher education job market. It applies to the Netherlands (where I had the misfortune to live and work), and perhaps to other EU nations. That country has little need of highly skilled and highly trained workers, in any field whatsoever. So the politicos (not often lovers of pure thought) figure that it&#039;s a waste of money to spend too much on higher education. But of course they cannot say this in public, for to do so would be to commit political suicide. Since they do wish to cut and downsize, they use Newspeak terms like &quot;modernzation,&quot; &quot;efficiency,&quot; &quot;preparing for the future,&quot; etc. Then they go right ahead and cut, often by firing staff and putting hiring on hold (forever?). That, I&#039;m sorry to say, is the bottom line in one country. I&#039;ll bet that similar tricks are used elsewhere, with the same hidden agenda in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>There&#8217;s an interesting political take on part of this problem in the higher education job market. It applies to the Netherlands (where I had the misfortune to live and work), and perhaps to other EU nations. That country has little need of highly skilled and highly trained workers, in any field whatsoever. So the politicos (not often lovers of pure thought) figure that it&#8217;s a waste of money to spend too much on higher education. But of course they cannot say this in public, for to do so would be to commit political suicide. Since they do wish to cut and downsize, they use Newspeak terms like &#8220;modernzation,&#8221; &#8220;efficiency,&#8221; &#8220;preparing for the future,&#8221; etc. Then they go right ahead and cut, often by firing staff and putting hiring on hold (forever?). That, I&#8217;m sorry to say, is the bottom line in one country. I&#8217;ll bet that similar tricks are used elsewhere, with the same hidden agenda in mind.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294960</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294960</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just read the presidential column in the latest MLA newsletter, and I am deeply dismayed. The Obama administration, she says, probably doesn&#039;t count &quot;our&quot; numbers when it calculates under- and unemployment; this blog post has also said no federal stimulus is coming our way, not that it&#039;s a news flash.  But why won&#039;t the MLA do any lobbying? Why are the humanities so damned silent in Washington? The N.E.H. has so little funding compared to, say, the N.I.H.--yet not a word of protest.  Count me among those who find this silence from humanists inhuman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve just read the presidential column in the latest <span class="caps">MLA</span> newsletter, and I am deeply dismayed. The Obama administration, she says, probably doesn&#8217;t count &#8220;our&#8221; numbers when it calculates under- and unemployment; this blog post has also said no federal stimulus is coming our way, not that it&#8217;s a news flash.  But why won&#8217;t the <span class="caps">MLA</span> do any lobbying? Why are the humanities so damned silent in Washington? The N.E.H. has so little funding compared to, say, the N.I.H.&#8212;yet not a word of protest.  Count me among those who find this silence from humanists inhuman.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Eltham</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294718</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Eltham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294718</guid>
		<description>Great! thanks John ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Great! thanks John ;)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Quiggin</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294715</link>
		<dc:creator>John Quiggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294715</guid>
		<description>These are positions to be filled by recent (or about-to-be) PhD graduates, so it would be possible to be appointed with no publications, but we would be expecting new hires to get at least two or three articles in good journals out of their dissertations. Obviously the best way of demonstrating that you can satisfy that expectation is to have the acceptance letters in your pocket, but if the articles look good (hence our demand for these to be included in the package)  the supporting letters are positive and the seminar goes well, we would take a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>These are positions to be filled by recent (or about-to-be) PhD graduates, so it would be possible to be appointed with no publications, but we would be expecting new hires to get at least two or three articles in good journals out of their dissertations. Obviously the best way of demonstrating that you can satisfy that expectation is to have the acceptance letters in your pocket, but if the articles look good (hence our demand for these to be included in the package)  the supporting letters are positive and the seminar goes well, we would take a chance.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Eltham</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294704</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Eltham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294704</guid>
		<description>John Q,

just out of interest, what sort of publication record would you expect succesful candidates to possess? 

I&#039;m not an economist but I am interested in the sort of record UQ economics would desire ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John Q,</p>

	<p>just out of interest, what sort of publication record would you expect succesful candidates to possess?</p>

	<p>I&#8217;m not an economist but I am interested in the sort of record UQ economics would desire ;)</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nona mouse</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294541</link>
		<dc:creator>nona mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294541</guid>
		<description>I should add that it is only claimed to be risky, in terms of tenure chances, for &lt;i&gt;women&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;  to have more than one child.

And I do not know how much of that is perception (you must not be serious about your career if you have two kids--something which can only be disproved by being a publishing superstar) or the actual demands of mothering.  Or a combination of both.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I should add that it is only claimed to be risky, in terms of tenure chances, for <i>women</i><i>  to have more than one child.</i></p>

	<p>And I do not know how much of that is perception (you must not be serious about your career if you have two kids&#8212;something which can only be disproved by being a publishing superstar) or the actual demands of mothering.  Or a combination of both.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nona mouse</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294540</link>
		<dc:creator>nona mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294540</guid>
		<description>&quot;This pushes my childbearing horizon back to 35, which, as the medical profession suggests, is too late.&quot;

This isn&#039;t too late for many women. But there is a higher risk that either you won&#039;t conceive or you will have miscarriages.  I always find it a bit strange that this cost of tenure for women is so comfortably accepted by many academics. It is interesting to compare women in medicine and other fields, such as law. Most women doctors have children whereas the number of women academics who have children is much smaller.  Some women manage to have one or more children though and still get tenure and others get lucky after tenure and can still conceive.  (The received wisdom is that it is very risky for tenure to have more than one.)  Some people want to adopt, and adoption agencies leave open a bigger window for age. There is a cut off age for some international adoptions but I don&#039;t know about domestic.

I can&#039;t think of a reason why women academics would be very different than women doctors in their desire to reproduce. So I think that more than a few women are sacrificing being parents to get tenure.  Being a woman who wants children and tenure at the same time is a true dilemma because you are running big risks in both directions: You might not have children and not get tenure, for example. Or you might wait and then be unable to have children.  Statistics about women in other professions suggest it is probably the tenure system rather than the standard problem of being in a demanding career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8220;This pushes my childbearing horizon back to 35, which, as the medical profession suggests, is too late.&#8221;</p>

	<p>This isn&#8217;t too late for many women. But there is a higher risk that either you won&#8217;t conceive or you will have miscarriages.  I always find it a bit strange that this cost of tenure for women is so comfortably accepted by many academics. It is interesting to compare women in medicine and other fields, such as law. Most women doctors have children whereas the number of women academics who have children is much smaller.  Some women manage to have one or more children though and still get tenure and others get lucky after tenure and can still conceive.  (The received wisdom is that it is very risky for tenure to have more than one.)  Some people want to adopt, and adoption agencies leave open a bigger window for age. There is a cut off age for some international adoptions but I don&#8217;t know about domestic.</p>

	<p>I can&#8217;t think of a reason why women academics would be very different than women doctors in their desire to reproduce. So I think that more than a few women are sacrificing being parents to get tenure.  Being a woman who wants children and tenure at the same time is a true dilemma because you are running big risks in both directions: You might not have children and not get tenure, for example. Or you might wait and then be unable to have children.  Statistics about women in other professions suggest it is probably the tenure system rather than the standard problem of being in a demanding career.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skutotomos</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294515</link>
		<dc:creator>Skutotomos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294515</guid>
		<description>Given all of the headaches associated with this process, why hasn&#039;t the MLA, or the AHA, or the APA, or any of the other three-letter nightmares, figured out a way to establish an online database onto which candidates could upload all of their materials, where referees could submit letters, and from where then hiring departments/institutions could log in to retrieve what they needed from whomever, whenever they happened to need it? With such a system the &quot;application&quot; portion could consist of an applicant emailing a tailored job letter to the SC, in which they also would give the committee an electronic password to unlock the documents needed by the SC. Voila! No more mailing, no more fretting, no more worries and expenses of Fed-Ex and deadlines.

I spent hundreds of dollars, and dozens of hours, mailing packages of various sorts to various places. No doubt most of those places never looked at all of the documents I sent them. Now, having been on the other side, I see how overworked our staff is when dealing with similar piles of documents from applicants. Quite frankly I find the whole system absurd. 

All of us are constantly emailing PDFs back and forth with very little problem. We upload pictures onto FaceSpace and its ilk. Why, then, do we still insist on burdening applicants and assistants with carbon-footprint-expanding slices of dead tree every year?

This wouldn&#039;t fix the larger problems of the academic job market, but it could go some way towards minimizing the absurdities of one part of the process. Were I designing this database I think I&#039;d also devote considerable server-power to the establishment of virtual interview rooms, where applicants and SCs could then conduct video-conferences in lieu of these soul-crushing conference cattle-calls. This would be much more fair economically to the applicants,  much more ecologically friendly, and save untold hours of travel and cost from the institutional end.

The more I sits and thinks of this, the more I wants to start the damn company myself and contract it out to the MLA, etc. ... Maybe after my tenure goes through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Given all of the headaches associated with this process, why hasn&#8217;t the <span class="caps">MLA</span>, or the <span class="caps">AHA</span>, or the <span class="caps">APA</span>, or any of the other three-letter nightmares, figured out a way to establish an online database onto which candidates could upload all of their materials, where referees could submit letters, and from where then hiring departments/institutions could log in to retrieve what they needed from whomever, whenever they happened to need it? With such a system the &#8220;application&#8221; portion could consist of an applicant emailing a tailored job letter to the SC, in which they also would give the committee an electronic password to unlock the documents needed by the SC. Voila! No more mailing, no more fretting, no more worries and expenses of Fed-Ex and deadlines.</p>

	<p>I spent hundreds of dollars, and dozens of hours, mailing packages of various sorts to various places. No doubt most of those places never looked at all of the documents I sent them. Now, having been on the other side, I see how overworked our staff is when dealing with similar piles of documents from applicants. Quite frankly I find the whole system absurd.</p>

	<p>All of us are constantly emailing PDFs back and forth with very little problem. We upload pictures onto FaceSpace and its ilk. Why, then, do we still insist on burdening applicants and assistants with carbon-footprint-expanding slices of dead tree every year?</p>

	<p>This wouldn&#8217;t fix the larger problems of the academic job market, but it could go some way towards minimizing the absurdities of one part of the process. Were I designing this database I think I&#8217;d also devote considerable server-power to the establishment of virtual interview rooms, where applicants and SCs could then conduct video-conferences in lieu of these soul-crushing conference cattle-calls. This would be much more fair economically to the applicants,  much more ecologically friendly, and save untold hours of travel and cost from the institutional end.</p>

	<p>The more I sits and thinks of this, the more I wants to start the damn company myself and contract it out to the <span class="caps">MLA</span>, etc. &#8230; Maybe after my tenure goes through.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294489</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294489</guid>
		<description>When I&#039;ve chaired a search and required writing samples up front, it&#039;s been for the convenience of the search committee, and because at my school we&#039;re almost always late getting our positions approved and advertised.  We proceed as Michael mentioned, cutting the 300-500 applications for a position in English or American lit. down to 50-75, and then down to the number we&#039;ll interview.  But if we had to notify those 50-75 and ask for writing samples, it would put an extra burden on an already tremendously overworked administrative assistant, and it severely increase the time pressures on the search committee, during that period near the end of the semester when decisions finally get made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>When I&#8217;ve chaired a search and required writing samples up front, it&#8217;s been for the convenience of the search committee, and because at my school we&#8217;re almost always late getting our positions approved and advertised.  We proceed as Michael mentioned, cutting the 300-500 applications for a position in English or American lit. down to 50-75, and then down to the number we&#8217;ll interview.  But if we had to notify those 50-75 and ask for writing samples, it would put an extra burden on an already tremendously overworked administrative assistant, and it severely increase the time pressures on the search committee, during that period near the end of the semester when decisions finally get made.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan DeLange</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294447</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan DeLange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294447</guid>
		<description>So you are saying that going on the job market in three or four years, after the Bush economy is over and people need to hire again to make up for what they couldn&#039;t do recently, is a good thing?

Excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>So you are saying that going on the job market in three or four years, after the Bush economy is over and people need to hire again to make up for what they couldn&#8217;t do recently, is a good thing?</p>

	<p>Excellent.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohtheirony</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294393</link>
		<dc:creator>ohtheirony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294393</guid>
		<description>@ 54 (Philip): &quot;And the complaint I hear from the women who have got to the top of the university ladder is that having children is not compatible with an academic career. If you look at the tenure race, it means that a woman has to put off having children until after 30 at the very earliest.&quot;

30 at the earliest?  That presumes that female grad students actually have time to meet potential mates by then.  I started my PhD program at 26, am now 30 and expect to graduate in 2011 (faster than average for English).  I happen to be married (met my spouse before I went back to school - lucky me).  But if I get pregnant now, I won&#039;t finish my degree on time, and I put my measly funding at risk.  And if I get pregnant next year, I won&#039;t get a job.  Because the accepted wisdom is that nobody hires a pregnant woman (assuming she makes it to the interview stage at all) because she&#039;s a &quot;risk.&quot;  You know, she might want to do it again, which would harm her productivity.  Not to mention the tenure clock.  Not to mention that there&#039;s no way I could *afford* to have children on my measly graduate stipend - I can hardly feed, clothe, and shelter myself.  And, presuming my first three jobs are postdoc or one-year appointments, this means that I will be on the job market constantly for the next three years (and likely adjuncting with no health insurance).  Say I then got a job, I might respectfully wait a  year before trying to get pregnant.  This pushes my childbearing horizon back to 35, which, as the medical profession suggests, is too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@ 54 (Philip): &#8220;And the complaint I hear from the women who have got to the top of the university ladder is that having children is not compatible with an academic career. If you look at the tenure race, it means that a woman has to put off having children until after 30 at the very earliest.&#8221;</p>

	<p>30 at the earliest?  That presumes that female grad students actually have time to meet potential mates by then.  I started my PhD program at 26, am now 30 and expect to graduate in 2011 (faster than average for English).  I happen to be married (met my spouse before I went back to school &#8211; lucky me).  But if I get pregnant now, I won&#8217;t finish my degree on time, and I put my measly funding at risk.  And if I get pregnant next year, I won&#8217;t get a job.  Because the accepted wisdom is that nobody hires a pregnant woman (assuming she makes it to the interview stage at all) because she&#8217;s a &#8220;risk.&#8221;  You know, she might want to do it again, which would harm her productivity.  Not to mention the tenure clock.  Not to mention that there&#8217;s no way I could <strong>afford</strong> to have children on my measly graduate stipend &#8211; I can hardly feed, clothe, and shelter myself.  And, presuming my first three jobs are postdoc or one-year appointments, this means that I will be on the job market constantly for the next three years (and likely adjuncting with no health insurance).  Say I then got a job, I might respectfully wait a  year before trying to get pregnant.  This pushes my childbearing horizon back to 35, which, as the medical profession suggests, is too late.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Hallam-Baker</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294378</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Hallam-Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294378</guid>
		<description>@37 (Donald) Yes, but teaching in PhD programs is what folk aspire to. Not teaching at community colleges or taking an interminable series of Post Doc positions. In the course of 5 years I held a total of six Post Doctoral positions, albeit three of those were before I submitted my thesis so I guess that they were Pre-Docs. 

To get onto tenure track I would have had to take at least one more since I was rather too busy doing useful research to play the game of writing on the topics that gains tenure. At the time, the Web was considered &#039;soft&#039; and &#039;unmanly&#039;, too &#039;commercial&#039;. To get papers published in real journals you had to be doing stuff with obscure theoretical math.

So the folk who were pushing the broken models of network hypertext are now the ones teaching in the colleges and the folk who built the Web are out in industry or working at Tim&#039;s highly industry facing W3C. We are only just getting to the notion that studying how people are using the Web is interesting. 

The point I am making here is that the academic selection process does not get you the best candidates. In fact the best candidates will have nothing to do with the process because they have other career options that do not require them to crawl over broken glass to get there - besides paying considerably better.

And the complaint I hear from the women who have got to the top of the university ladder is that having children is not compatible with an academic career. If you look at the tenure race, it means that a woman has to put off having children until after 30 at the very earliest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@37 (Donald) Yes, but teaching in PhD programs is what folk aspire to. Not teaching at community colleges or taking an interminable series of Post Doc positions. In the course of 5 years I held a total of six Post Doctoral positions, albeit three of those were before I submitted my thesis so I guess that they were Pre-Docs.</p>

	<p>To get onto tenure track I would have had to take at least one more since I was rather too busy doing useful research to play the game of writing on the topics that gains tenure. At the time, the Web was considered &#8216;soft&#8217; and &#8216;unmanly&#8217;, too &#8216;commercial&#8217;. To get papers published in real journals you had to be doing stuff with obscure theoretical math.</p>

	<p>So the folk who were pushing the broken models of network hypertext are now the ones teaching in the colleges and the folk who built the Web are out in industry or working at Tim&#8217;s highly industry facing <span class="caps">W3C</span>. We are only just getting to the notion that studying how people are using the Web is interesting.</p>

	<p>The point I am making here is that the academic selection process does not get you the best candidates. In fact the best candidates will have nothing to do with the process because they have other career options that do not require them to crawl over broken glass to get there &#8211; besides paying considerably better.</p>

	<p>And the complaint I hear from the women who have got to the top of the university ladder is that having children is not compatible with an academic career. If you look at the tenure race, it means that a woman has to put off having children until after 30 at the very earliest.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny Easwaran</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294335</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny Easwaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294335</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(2) A job letter IS a writing sample. You know after reading those two pages if the applicant writes well, if they can present their research in a compelling way, and if they are a plausible fit for your department’s needs.&lt;/i&gt;

That seems to be another disciplinary difference.  In philosophy I don&#039;t know anyone whose cover letter was two pages long.  Mine was barely 3/4 of a page, including the address fields at the top and the space for my signature at the bottom.  If all these sorts of things are much shorter in philosophy than in English, then perhaps it does make the writing sample more relevant earlier on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>(2) A job letter IS a writing sample. You know after reading those two pages if the applicant writes well, if they can present their research in a compelling way, and if they are a plausible fit for your department&#8217;s needs.</i></p>

	<p>That seems to be another disciplinary difference.  In philosophy I don&#8217;t know anyone whose cover letter was two pages long.  Mine was barely 3/4 of a page, including the address fields at the top and the space for my signature at the bottom.  If all these sorts of things are much shorter in philosophy than in English, then perhaps it does make the writing sample more relevant earlier on?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astrongmaybe</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294291</link>
		<dc:creator>astrongmaybe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294291</guid>
		<description>By all accounts the situation in the other modern languages is if anything worse than in English. So, for example, the wikis&#039; figures on tenure track positions in German, offered on the opening day of the MLA List: 

2006: 38
2007: 34
2008: 23
2009: 8.  

A few more jobs will trickle along in the following weeks and months, but not many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>By all accounts the situation in the other modern languages is if anything worse than in English. So, for example, the wikis&#8217; figures on tenure track positions in German, offered on the opening day of the <span class="caps">MLA </span>List:</p>

	<p>2006: 38<br />
2007: 34<br />
2008: 23<br />
2009: 8.</p>

	<p>A few more jobs will trickle along in the following weeks and months, but not many.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://crookedtimber.org/2009/11/04/applications/comment-page-2/#comment-294287</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crookedtimber.org/?p=13588#comment-294287</guid>
		<description>...as well as ability to spell, obviously.  That I can fake; if pressed I&#039;ll say that Americans spell it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>&#8230;as well as ability to spell, obviously.  That I can fake; if pressed I&#8217;ll say that Americans spell it that way.</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: crookedtimber.org @ 2012-02-13 03:45:07 -->
