Comments on: Chatroulette

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:52:04 +0000

I can’t explain how much this makes me love you.

By: Jon H

Jon H — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:26:19 +0000

The ‘fucuk you’ guy: is that one of the Gallaghers from Oasis?

By: Tom M

Tom M — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:16:44 +0000

Son’s experiment with chatroulette:

just chatrouletted for like an hour. final tally: 12 penises, 1 couple having sex, 5 girls, 1 creepy doll monster, 25394 dudes

By: Substance McGravitas

Substance McGravitas — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:04:36 +0000

Of interest? Chatroulette with zippy piano.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32vpgNiAH60

By: Strether

Strether — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:20:47 +0000

Chmn. Meow— Nice work in this thread. Callous sophisticates!

By: ogmb

ogmb — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:18:10 +0000

Since you’re only posting the SFW bits, can we assume that you subsequently got it on with the Quantifying Risk Stranger?

By: Karl Steel

Karl Steel — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:16:58 +0000

Kid, high fives all around, with only one party left fiveless and low.

By: kid bitzer

kid bitzer — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:13:28 +0000

don’t mention it, c.m.—i forgive you entirely, and the less said the better.
really; it’s just water over the dam, and we won’t mention it again.
it won’t be an issue in any way, shape, or form. it’s a non-issue. at ease.

By: chairman meow

chairman meow — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:31:53 +0000

Oh forgive me, kid bitzer. I take it all back. This was just Kieran’s honest (though naive) attempt to start interesting discussions on Ancient Greece with members of the Chatroulette community. Who could’ve guessed such hijinks would ensue?

By: Ginger Yellow

Ginger Yellow — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:12:38 +0000

“all a question of which trôle to assume.”

How very serendipitous.

By: Barry Freed

Barry Freed — Mon, 15 Mar 2010 01:00:33 +0000

kid, your last was superb.

By: kid bitzer

kid bitzer — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:28:54 +0000

i’m also reminded that gatsby’s library is said to be huge and uncut.

By: kid bitzer

kid bitzer — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:10:14 +0000

karl steel’s got a point. a stack of books that was really meant to intimidate would be in fancy languages.
“call that a stack of books? that’s not a stack of books. they’re all in english!”

or the exhibitionist might whip out his own books. “see these? i wrote ‘em all myself.”

combine the two: “see these? these are editions of the books i wrote, translated into fancy languages”.

no, no—kieran’s stack was meant to start conversations, not end them. i’ve seen some conversation-ending stacks of books, and they didn’t look like that.

By: chairman meow

chairman meow — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:21:03 +0000

I party with aristocrats.

By: Substance McGravitas

Substance McGravitas — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:12:18 +0000

OTOH, I have been known to abuse myself.

At parties?