Student: I just wanted to be sure I understood the Engels reading.
Me: OK.
Student: I mean, I think I got it — like, he went to Manchester and it was totally gross and everything, right?
Me: That’s about right, I suppose.
And speaking of class warfare, consider the headlines from these two stories, nestled next to each other in the Times right now:
U.S. Seeking Cuts in Rent Subsidies for Poor Families. The Bush administration has proposed reducing the value of subsidized-housing vouchers given to poor residents in New York City next year, with even bigger cuts planned for some urban areas in New England. The proposal is based on a disputed new formula that averages higher rents in big cities with those of suburban areas, which tend to have lower costs…
Legal Loophole Inflates Profits in Student Loans. The federal government is paying hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary subsidies to student loan companies even though the Bush administration has the authority to cut them off immediately, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office.
It’s probably worth some Think-Tanker’s time to express the money involved in the former story in terms of the money involved in the latter story, and package it into a 1-liner about the present Administration’s approach to social policy.
This seems like it might be covered by one of my proposed Bush/Cheney mottoes:
Taxing the Workers, Representing the Executives
Not a perfect fit, but perhaps the right direction at least.
Prudent policy positions? A good target o’sneer (welfare cheats) is much more, useful…
Bush/Cheney: when a scapegoat’s better than a solution.
One-liner indeed. It took me 5 minutes to find the report and check the Dept of Education’s letter referred to by the NY Timse. It appears that anything more than one line and you’d get snagged by the facts.
1st, the Dept of Education notes in its letter to the GAO regarding the draft report that the Dept agrees that the program ought to be “scaled back considerably,” and that the Bush budget for FY 2005 proposes just that. 2nd, the letter notes that it has to undergo a rulemaking process governed by the Administrative Procedures Act. An agency ignores the APA at its peril, bec/ if it does then its decision will be appealed and the courts will slap it right back.
So I guess the question is, do you favor a system of government that ignores required procedures and instead allows agencies to do whatever they feel appropriate?
The Condition of the Working Class in Manchester
Darn. I was hoping you were going to make some sort of cheap shot about Rio Ferdinand actually having to play a game in exchange for the ninety thousand pounds per week he’s been trousering over the past eight months.
Bull sez:
“So I guess the question is, do you favor a system of government that ignores required procedures and instead allows agencies to do whatever they feel appropriate?”
No, I don’t favor it, but that sounds like the Bush administration, all right, especially when it comes to social and environmental policy.
Concerning the cutback of housing subsidies.
It should also be noted the new formula (Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 ) was signed into law by President Clinton. The bill does not call for a reduction in the total amount of government funds spent on housing subsidies. The new formula requires housing authorities to provide documentation of actual expenses as a requirement for receiving government aid. In the past, established housing authorities where only required to provide minimal documentation.
From a seperate NY Times article:
“About four-fifths of the nation’s 3,100 or so public housing agencies are expected to gain money over the next two years, according to preliminary HUD data analyzed by the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials. Hundreds of agencies in the South, led by Texas and Florida, are poised to gain at least 50 percent.”
This does not support your thesis.
[ADM continues to bang head against wall at Kieran’s warping of medieval society.] Brittanica?? How about the Cambridge Medieval History, for Pete’s sake? Or something less wishy-washy and misleading. Some poor History prof is now going to have to go over the whole damned thing again, thus pissing of the student, who “learned” about feudal society and what the Historian asserts is NOT what he learned. [still banging head on wall]
BTW — When was England last in a position of having a choice of central defenders? No one’s seen Rio play for a while, the wonderful Sol has been out, and meanwhile Terry and King (who’s still quite young) are improving. Not to mention Woodgate, although I think there are question marks there.
Why are we subsidizing 4 bedroom apartments at all? Three bedrooms (one for parents, one for boys, one for girls) is the largest we need to be worrying about. As for the suburbia issue - as I’ve said before, living in expensive areas like New York, Boston, or LA is not a birthright. If you can’t afford to live there, move to Sioux Falls. You can get by on fast food wages there better than you can on $10-15/hr in New York. The Feds should be paying a flat subsidy nationally, based on the national average - this rewards people for moving to cheap places to live.
If the State of New York or City of New York wants to boost that, they should be allowed to, but the Feds shouldn’t be subsidizing New York’s greater amenities or whatever causes people to live there instead of someplace saner. (It shore ain’t jobs - NYC has a higher than average unemployment rate - around 7%.)
The other issue depends on how the law was written - did it guarantee the 9.5% for the term of the loan, or was that adjustable? If the former, it would be rude and self-destructive to cut that - it is no different from the government issuing 9.5% fixed-rate bonds, and now being annoyed that they are having to pay so much. If they were to cut under those circumstances, no one would believe the government’s future guarantees, and the needed rate of interest to get entry to the market would be much higher next time. If the latter, then by all means, cut, cut.
Hi Kieran—
Have you ever considered having your students read novels by Elizabeth Gaskell and others like her along with Engels? Gaskell’s North and South (and other novels about early industrial England) might be useful… I think novelists were doing some of the most interesting sociology in the 19th century.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review