Need a fresh reason to dislike Bill O’Reilly?
O’Reilly scolds guest who outed gays, then calls judge a lesbianFox News Channel’s star talk-show personality, Bill O’Reilly, says he is uncomfortable with the practice of outing gay political figures—except, it seems, when he is doing the outing.
On his show Monday night, O’Reilly chastised guest Michael Rogers for maintaining a Web site publicizing the names of gay staffers working for politicians who oppose gay marriage….
But on the same show—and for at least the third time in the last year—O’Reilly described one of the justices on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court as a lesbian, a claim that the justice herself, through a spokeswoman, denies.
For the record, I am opposed to outing, whether it’s done by Bill O’Reilly or by people on my side.
UPDATE: “I gave up the homosexual lifestyle four years ago.” Terrific New Republic first-person story on gay marriage.
I’m glad to get this comment in early: Rogers is not “outing” anybody. These staffers are (to my understanding) all openly gay. He is publicizing this fact, not revealing anybody’s secrets. The term “outing” refers to the nonconsensual revelation of someone’s secret sexual orientation. This is more like letting everyone know who your wife is, not who your mistress is.
Politically, I can only think that this would be comparable to publicizing the ethnic heritage of staffers to some xenophobic politician. It’s hard to come up with an actual historical comparison, although perhaps someone else can.
I can’t pretend to know the specifics of all of the people on Rogers’ list, but I’d have to be convinced that all of these people are openly gay. If they’re like any other group of gay people that I’ve known, I’d imagine that some of them openly participate in the gay community, but aren’t out at work, or to everyone in their families. Some of them probably don’t want Google to find them on this list when they apply for their next job. Some of them may not feel that it’s an issue; they’d tell if asked, but don’t volunteer it.
Calibrating the appropriate degree of “outness” is a difficult decision, and a private one. I wish it wasn’t- I wish that gays were accepted without a second thought- but it isn’t that way. For me, it’s always been easy issue to draw a bright line on the issue, and say that it’s inappropriate to out people against their will.
Ted, are you opposed to outing even when done for those who are clearly are involved in a politics that exploits an anti-gay agenda?
How about talking about sex lives of heterosexual “traditional values” politicians who, by their private behavior, are known to be complete hypocrites?
Personally I am opposed to outing of any sexuality at all, and the sexualisation of public discourse - Sex is a private personal matter and it should remain that way.
There is no need to discuss people’s sexual experimentation in a normal public forum, and people who do like Bill O’Reilly (among many others) are BOORs.
Mondo,
Pretty much, yeah. I’ll look the other way when it comes to exposing adultery, but I thought that the case against Jack Ryan, for example, was ridiculous.
What’s he got against Sosman? She dissented. I guess it must be an “even the liberal New Republic”-type argument?
On outing, generally: how would this compare to making it public that a segregationist politician has an illegitimate mixed-race daughter?
It’s certainly not a perfect analogy—there’s a second person involved who may or may not consent, and there’s a difference between the staffer and the politician. But is it relevant at all? (That’s an honest question; I’m not sure it is.)
I do not believe that sex is private at all, there is the old french creole proverb that goes tell me who you love and i will tell you who you are.
The personal is explicitily poltically, and when the highest politicians in the land are performing acts of hatred and destruction, i think it is our duty to stop them, using any means nessc.
The amount of hypcorisy (sp) needed to work for homophobic staff members when you yourself are queer needs to be noted, payed attention to, and done something about. It needs to be stopped.
One way of stopping it, and a legitimate way, as far as I’m concerned is outing. Frankly, I think the closet is too safe and too comfortable, and it allows for those who are the other to rise above where t hey would be stuck if they were not. I favour outing practically anyone, get all of that nasty purtian junk out of our collective unconciousness and talk freely about the issues as they need to be talked about.
I know that those weren’t Bill O’Rielly’s motivations, but do you know what ? If he made another self hating dyke squirm inadventently in her own complaceny, i figure he did a good thing.
Btw.re Bill O’Reilly & Fox - Since there are a fair amount of Brit and int’l contributors to and readers of this blog I’d like to ask this question - O’Reilly and Fox seem to think that getting Fox to be seen as widely as possible throughout the world will help “foreigners” get the right message about America and its intentions (will help the Bush administration). My own experience (I’m an American) shows that the exact opposite is likely to be the outcome - a quick survey of my friends in Germany and elsewhere in Europe tell me that they are quite appalled by O’Reilly’s mix of self-righteousness and arrogance and ignorance - and that this reinforces the impression that some in America have lost their minds - This said I think Fox SHOULD be viewed as widely as possible, not because of its message, but because governments should not be in the business of regulating news broadcasts (as in Canada).
Hypocrisy should be exposed. But endangering people’s lives, reputations, or livelihoods, to further your own political agenda, is weak, unless you take on the responsibility for what ensues. It’s drafting unwilling conscripts, acceptable in dire moments, but social fascism the rest of the time. “Outing” people doesn’t bring them into the light necessarily, but it does make them vulnerable to the chaotic viciousness of an ill society.
Not all social contexts are equal. We don’t live in the media, or in the political spaces, the virtual realities, occupied by activists.
The American soul is festering with sexual pathologies. Jerking away bandages and scabs isn’t going to be a therapeutic move for all concerned.
There’s too much revenge and retaliation in the catharsis. The goal isn’t the raw truth of existence smacking people in the face, the goal is health, healing.
-
“governments should not be in the business of regulating news broadcasts”
But who should? The “free” market? The public? No one?
Should students be in charge of their own educations? In grade school? Isn’t the news kind of an ephemeral education? If the news media are analogs of our primary senses, don’t we need a discriminating mind directing them? Otherwise it’s just this infantile jumping, from one bright stimulus to the next.
The problem is that the only way to stop the festering is to let the wound breathe.
The only way to stop homophobia is to recognize that their are queer folk around, in impt positions doing impt things.
The vital thing is to make sure that instutions will become open to all sorts, and by having some people being willing to hide and make polite makes it impossible for the rest of us to have those jobs and be those people.
Those in power will chose those in closet over those in the streets, unless we make it impossible for them to be in the closet.
The answer to Fox is to carefully document their bias, and then take criminal action against the Republican Party and White House for illegal campaign activities. Or something like that, I don’t know the law. But coordination between Ailes and the WH has been documented. The recent memos are additional evidence. I would like see the Repubs hit with a few billion in fines.
…
That some gays are partially or completely closeted, unwillingly due to adverse consequences in the workplace, makes me feel like I am tolerating or condoning apartheid or discrimination. If Chris Matthews was Jewish, but couldn’t tell anyone for fear of losing his job, it would simply be an unacceptable society needing immediate adjustment.
On the other hand, many people engage in sexual practices they would rather not be known to their co-workers. I have been, since the subject came up, trying to carefully see how bondage and discipline differs intrinsically. Dick would rather the world not know that Lynne wields the whip.
I don’t endorse “outing.” Ted is absolutely right. Everyone’s sexual orientation should be considered private (and all of our inferences about the sexuality of others should be discounted as speculative at best).
The only exception is for those who have made made some kind of public commitment or announcement, whether through marriage or other means. Even then, I’m not really comfortable with outing anyone. Better to stick to the issues and avoid statements that might be construed as intimidating or shaming.
anthony — That’s funny, I always thought the great battle against homophobia was all about getting a bunch of self-righteous, ideologically driven blowhards out of my pants and out of my bedroom, not merely about letting in another bunch, not even a bunch whose agenda I’ll freely admit to liking somewhat more.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review