A few years ago, two friends of mine were walking with a Danish friend through Copenhagen one evening. As they passed the parliament building, a vaguely familiar man walked out. Their Danish friend smiled and said ‘good night’. The man responded in kind, and headed for a bus stop. It was Nyrup Rasmussen, the prime minister of the day.
The queen of Denmark is regularly to be seen walking alone through the main shopping thoroughfare of Copenhagen. Sweden is similar. In the country that gave the world Ombudsmen, part of government openness means that senior politicians walk openly and freely amongst the public, and generally disdain body guards.
Another anecdote; a journalist friend described interviewing Chris Patten when Patten was with the Northern Ireland office during the 1980s. The conversation continued as Patten walked to his car, got down on his knees and thoroughly examined the underneath, before standing up again and opening the car-door. All the time speaking as if nothing out of the ordinary was happening. Imagine incorporating that kind of personal risk (and risk to your family) into your daily routine.
Anna Lindh, Sweden’s rising political star, did not survive the multiple stab wounds she received while out shopping with a friend on Wednesday afternoon. As she was someone who championed openness in government, it will be a terrible shame if her legacy must be a distancing of Swedish politicians from the people they represent.
Open Democracy has an essay from a political commentator and long time friend of Lindh. The Economist considers how her death will affect the euro referendum in Sweden.
I remember an anecdote from one of Bill Bryson’s books. He was travelling in Denmark when someone told him that the queen quite often went for walks without a bodyguard. Bryson asked, “Who protects her?” “Why, we all do,” said his host, which he thought was sweet.
I don’t quite understand how this event can be seen by anyone as a real criticism of Sweden’s open society. People are attacked and killed for non-political reasons every now and then, even in Sweden, and not having government leaders protected by bodyguards inevitably means that such will happen to one of them from time to time.
Palme’s assasination was probably political in some sense, and so more appropriately was cause for reevaluation. Not Lindh’s.
“People are attacked and killed for non-political reasons every now and then, even in Sweden, and not having government leaders protected by bodyguards inevitably means that such will happen to one of them from time to time.”
Hmm. Not necessarily. Not in countries where a high murder rate is not taken for granted. Statistically, in countries where people don’t just wander around casually murdering people at random intervals, the likelihood of a cabinet minister’s being stabbed to death in a department store just because it was one of those things is pretty damn small. Like non-existent, I would think.
This report says she was chased by her assailant through the store. It also describes her as a rising star and the only politician with the charisma to save the “yes” to the euro campaign. Sounds like she was fairly well known and deliberately targeted. Hopefully they catch the guy.
“Like non-existent, I would think.” Well, not quite. Close to non-existant. But it will happen. I don’t understand your point.
Pretty needless death, really. It sounds like a single security guard would have prevented it.
Whack jobs attack famous people. Governments should plan for that.
My point.
“not having government leaders protected by bodyguards inevitably means that such will happen to one of them from time to time.”
No it doesn’t and no it won’t, in a country where random murders are extremely rare and cabinet ministers or government leaders are, obviously, a tiny fraction of the population. My point is that the odds of any one Swede getting murdered is, statistically, tiny, so why whould we assume it will inevitably happen to government ministers apart from the fact that they are goveernment ministers?
“…so why whould we assume it will inevitably happen to government ministers apart from the fact that they are goveernment ministers?”
Because the probability is non-zero?
Every victim of random, violent crime is a member of some minority group. Physicists make up a very small portion of Swede society, so does that mean that if a Swedish physicist is murdered as Lindh was then it must be because he/she was a physicist? Why, I’m wondering, am I arguing with you about this? It’s a simple matter of fact, not opinion.
Well, I’m not sure either. It is a small point, certainly. But this is what you said:
“People are attacked and killed for non-political reasons every now and then, even in Sweden, and not having government leaders protected by bodyguards inevitably means that such will happen to one of them from time to time.”
Perhaps I’m thick, but I don’t see what you mean. If you mean given many centuries or perhaps millennia, eventually one of Sweden’s few murder victims will end up being a government minister, on the same principle that if you allow a chimpanzee infinite time it will eventually write ‘Hamlet’, then perhaps you’re right. But that’s not what I took you to be saying. I took you to be saying that “such will happen to one of them from time to time.” From time to time sounds to me more like every few years or perhaps decades than like thousands of years.
Or to put it another way, random, non-politically motivated murders of Swedish government leaders are not a common occurrence, not something that just happens “from time to time”. That’s all. A small factual point. Unless you just meant something quite different from what you said, in which case, never mind.
(I did actually have a point even though it’s a small one - that violence is not common in Sweden, so it’s odd to assume that government ministers [who are a much smaller class than doctors, by the way: we’re talking about, what, ten or twenty people total?] are going to be killed at random now and then.)
given the descriptions of the murder it sounds quite a bit more likely to be political in nature as opposed to a random act.
My theory is that it was a revenge attack, for the EU’s declaration of Hamas as a terrorist group just a few days before.
Keith, you come up with the damndest arguments! Yeah, everyone is a member of some small minority group (or infinitely many, really), but there are reasons why we always suspect political motives when political leaders are murdered, especially when there is no other apparent motive.
The class of well-known Swedish political leaders may be the same size as the class of redheaded, lefthanded paraplegics, but people would be quite justified in suspecting political motives in this case, but not suspecting a conspiracy against r.h.l.h. paraplegics if one of them is murdered.
The reasons for this are not to be found in a statistics text.
Whoa, slow down everybody! For once on a blog you’re ALL making sense, so just be happy for smart company.
The “political” factor is important, but for a deranged person it has to do with notoriety, not politics per se. So yes they are more likely to be in danger but no it doesn’t mean that it was political in the sense everybody’s using it here.
If this guy is a John Hinckley (sp?) type, a famous athelete would have also been a possible target. But if the pictures posted on the Web are accurate, he would have gotten his ass kicked by somebody like Annika Sorenstam.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review