Thanks to Tyler Cowen, over at Volokh , I came across Jason Brennan’s list of movies with philosophical themes . It’s a good list , though a bit lacking in non-American content. Possible additions? There’s already been some blogospheric discussion of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance and Christine Korsgaard’s claim that it illustrates Kant on revolutions (scroll down comments). Strictly Ballroom arguably deals with freedom, existentialism, and revolution. Rashomon is about the epistemology of testimony. Dr Strangelove covers the ethics of war and peace and some issues in game theory (remember the doomsday machine?). Suggestions?
UPDATE: I see Matthew Yglesias is also discussing this.
Suggeestion: ALL MY SONS…Arthur Miller’s timely tragedy concerning war, money, and family secrets…..the James Whitmore version.
Suggestion: ALL MY SONS…Arthur Miller’s timely tragedy concerning war, money, and family secrets…..the James Whitmore version.
The City of Lost Children has a central character who’s a brain in a vat. At one point he says, I think therefore I am. Amusingly, he is also the film’s evil genius, pulling the strings. (And then another character gets cloned several times, and isn’t sure which one he is, etc.)
Gosford Park is good on “role morality” vs global morality.
A Simple Plan, and of course The Godfather, are pretty great on moral psychology
The Unbearable Lightness of Being (1988) - Nietzsche, Fate, Perception, Being, Recurrance,
Total Recall (1990) - Perception, Reality, Dreams, Berkeley,
Crimson Tide (1995) - Moral Decisions, whether one should follow orders strictly as given,
The Fisher King (1991) - The meaning of life, sin, tragedy, redemption,
most obvious absence:
Ingmar Bergman - The Seventh Seal
another obvious one:
Jim Jarmusch - Dead Man
not entirely sure:
Wim Wenders - Sky over Berlin
Sophie’s Choice
Sliding Doors
Boxing Helena. In the running for Worst Movie of its Decade, watching the first 20 minutes in the cinema made me contemplate the first of all philosophical questions, viz, “Why am I here?”
oh, I also subscribe to q’s suggestions for Unbearable Lightness and the Fisher King, and chris’s A Simple Plan, I loved that film.
Since Bill Paxton was in it, I’m reminded he made Frailty, which turned really crap in the ending, but before that it wasn’t too bad in terms of playing with perceptions of reality and truth (a bit like Memento in some bits, maybe), ethical issues and religious fanaticism… so maybe in the broadest sense it has some “philosophical” content too.
… last: since Vanilla Sky is included, and to balance the extremely Hollywood-centric nature of the list, the original Abre Los Ojos by Alejandro Amenabar should be in there as well at the very least, and also his “The Others”.
Also, Amantes del Circulo Polar, by another Spanish director.
God, what a dire list! Starting with “The Matrix” - from a philosophical standpoint interesting only for the celerity with which it junked its half-baked metaphysics for kick-boxing and CG - does inform us what we’re in for at the earliest opportunity, though.
So tedious to remind everyone of Memento, but I already said that.
Donny Darko (2001) - Time travel - neither coherent nor absurd AFAICS, alternative reality, false experience
Hurly Burly (1998)- existentialism (there may be many other exemplars of this theme, but I like the way this comes at you in bursts)
In the Company of Men (1997) - as Cruel Intentions, sympathy and value nihilism.
Sans Soleil (1983) Another meditiation on memory and experience by the director of La Jetee.
Having actually read (hem) the motivation behind Brennan’s list, I’ll admit that my “dire” comment was unfair.
But, given philosophy’s sweep over the human condition, how could a film worth watching not connect with some philosophical issue somewhere? Conversely, any film which fetishizes a technical philosophical issue is no more likely to be interesting than one about tappets.
That list is proof that some philosophicly interesting movies are really bad. I never understood why people liked The Matrix, Memento, or the truly horrible Vanilla Sky.
Why did people like Momento? Well, some people like movies because the people in them are awesome. Not from an acting standpoint, but because they are amazingly beautiful. Guy Pierce in Momento was an example of that.
The Matrix movies stunk. I never saw Vanilla Sky.
Why did people like Momento? Well, some people like movies because the people in them are awesome. Not from an acting standpoint, but because they are amazingly beautiful. Guy Pierce in Momento was an example of that.
The Matrix movies stunk. I never saw Vanilla Sky.
Clan of the Cave Bear, but you had to read the book. The movie was weak. Reaffirm the Godfather, again read the book. Assigned reading in one of my college management classes. Casablanca and any of Bogies overwrought lines. q. - you’ll like this one. “How do you measure yourself among the other golfers? Height!” Caddyshack.
Oh, I forgot Primary Colors. True!
That’s a bizarre question.
What work of art doesn’t deal in philosophical ideas?
Or are you asking about works that illustrate them?
There’s a huge difference.
That’s why SF gets so little respect in literary circles. It’s mediocre art, based on a misunderstanding. it’s fun but by and large, crap. Same for ‘philosophical’ films.
Tech heads, analytic philosophers, economists and libertarians, never seem to understand this. That’s why the web is so full of fans of ‘speculative’ fiction.
Drives me F’n nuts.
Kieslowski’s Blind Chance is a fascinating meditation on alternate realities with some reflection on politics in Poland in the 1980s…
I’ll second Alex’s nominations of Sans Soleil and Donnie Darko. Has anyone mentioned Dark City, another great film about memory and identity.
Does anybody know any good movies with much philosophical content that are currently in the theatres?
Thanks
If Strictly Ballroom “deals with freedom, existentialism, and revolution” then Mary Poppins is perhaps the finest cinematic account of the “linguistic turn” in philosophy (“Supercallifragilisticexpiallidocious”, in particular) with Dick van Dyke’s (widely misunderstood) chimley sweep as a devastating satire on the Heideggerian conception of authenticity.
Don’t forget Stanley Cavell’s analysis of these movies—The Lady Eve, It Happened One Night, Bringing Up Baby, The Philadelphia Story, His Girl Friday, Adam’s Rib, and The Awful Truth— in his Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage (Harvard University Press, 1981).
And his analysis of these movies—Gaslight, Stella Dallas, Now, Voyager, and Letter from an Unknown Woman—in his Contesting Tears: The Melodrama of the Unknown Woman (University of Chicago Press, 1996).
Strictly Ballroom is also very strong on the meaning and power of foreignness in for political communities. On this topic, see also The Wizard of Oz and lots of Westerns, including Shane.
All three are wonderfully analyzed in this context in Democracy and the Foreigner by Bonnie Honig (Princeton, 2001).
Why did I like Memento? Because on first viewing it looked like it might actually hold together structurally on a second viewing; and on a second viewing it actually did. Of course, further viewings would have been (and are) pointless.
BTW, every movie I’ve ever seen that was supposedly “philosophical” (including Seventh Seal)
has been puerile.
As someone who took one of those “Philosophy in Film” courses as an undergrad, I’ve always found this question interesting and think it shouldn’t be limited to the “recent films in English that students won’t find boring” limitations of the list under discussion. (At the very least, the tendentious illustrations of “feminism” could be improved by a broader scope). But might there not be a difference between films dealing with grand thematic matter - such as death or identity - and those whose thematic treatment of such ideas can be read in some way philosophical? And how do we read films’ themes as philosophical in their approach? I have my own ideas, but then again, I’m a film guy, not a philosophy scholar. I’d be curious to know what others, particularly the philosophically inclined, think about how we read some films as simply narrative and others as philosophy (and perhaps a third set as in-between).
Ken: I just saw “Reconstruction” at the Atlanta Film Festival, and if it gets a wider release, I’d recommend it. It is a little obvious in places. There’s a narrator figure who says things such as “Film is a construction, but it still hurts.” But in terms of reflecting on memory and identity (particularly as they relate to love), it’s a fascinating film.
Not to plug my own blog or anything, but here’s my review:
http://chutry.wordherders.net/archives/002100.html
One of my favorite philosophical films has got to be Woody Allen’s “Bullets Over Broadway.” It deals with the artist’s relationship to art, and asks a pointed question about whether human life is more important than art, which it then answers in a rather bizarre way. A very fun film as well.
Glad to see at least one timber-ite mention Cavell: should also note that his new book Cities of Words is out & is very good: if you’ve wanted to read him but haven’t had time to read Senses… or Claim… or his Emerson pieces, this book puts his summation on those together with his thoughts on how his philosophical preoccupations play out in films (how they talk to each other).
More Hollywood, but that’s what I see. Groundhog Day
One of Cavell’s former students, William Rothman, has written a bit of criticism (with philosophical references?) on five Alfred Hitchcock films—The Lodger, Murder!, The Thirty-Nine Steps, Shadow of a Doubt, and Psycho—in his Hitchcock: The Murderous Gaze (Harvard University Press, 1982), 371 pp.
Seth Edenbaum writes: it’s fun but by and large, crap
Ted Sturgeon points out: “90% of everything is crud”.
The point isn’t the crap, it’s the good stuff.
Chuck: Thanks for the tip. We’re (my on-air partner John Perry and I) are always looking for movies with philosophical content. We have a sometimes segment on our show, Philosophy Talk, called “Philosophy Talk goes to the Movies.” We seem to prefer doing first-run movies. I’m not sure that’s essential, but it makes it harder to find good fodder, so we do it rarely.
Anyway, thanks for the tip.
Mindwalk.
Without a doubt it outshines everything else on the list for me.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100151/
1. The Purple Rose of Cairo—good old art vs reality, each informing the other…
2. (Don’t laugh) Star Trek: First Contact—life-affirming technological advance vs soul-destroying, if seductive, technological imperialism…hard to find the two in one place.
3. Blow-up—what is reality, anyway?
South Park The Movie (also the TV show). Nature of good and evil, where does evil come from, the sacrafice of the individual vs. the group, and most importantly, although it is to parody crappy Broadway musicals, is it right?
Le Resistance lives on!
Also Buffy the movie but not the TV show which was way to self-concious about the whole philosophy thing to be useful for this discussion. OK the musical episode was cool and would work, but that’s it. Unless teenage years understood as coming out story is philosophy in which case the seasons up through high school graduation count.
Do The Right Thing
Koyannisqatsi
The Handmaid’s Tale
Iron Monkey
Big.
I think that’s a rilly deep movie. Especially the bit at FAO Schwartz where Hanks and the boss play a tune on the floor piano by dancing back and forth on the keys.
I suppose everyone heard the segment on ‘Front Row’ a couple of weeks ago in which Julian Baggini told us about Nietzsche in the movies?
I’d add THE STUNT MAN to this list.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081568/
This film addresses predestination, free will, and subjectivity along the same lines as the Truman Show, but in the form of an entertaining action flick. Great performance by Peter O’Toole as an unhinged film director with a God complex.
Repo Man.
Oh, and Night Shift (the one with TV’s The Fonz, not the Big Steve King one). Obviously.
Brazil.
Let me second both Dr. Strangelove and La Jetee. I showed both to my Phil Lit class last semester, and both went over well. In fact, the reaction to Strangelove kind of frightened me. I had seen it shown in my undergrad (in the 80s) and I had shown it myself in the 90s, and both times it went over flat. The kids saw it as some distant, 50s thing, and didn’t even giggle. This year I showed it again, and they laughed like it was an Adam Sandler vehicle. The only thing I can think to explain it is that the film makes much more sense as a satire if you actually worry that your government might be a bunch of incompetent psychopaths with the power to destroy the world. shudder
And I can’t believe no-one has yet recommended Being John Malchovich. Phil mind, and funny as hell to boot.
If we’re going to talk about the Matrix and philosophy, then I’ve always thought it was most interesting in terms’ of Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling (Neo as Knight of Faith in the first film).
Other movies to add to these excellent lists:
Sling Blade: ethics in general, but as a critique/treatment of Kant in particular (the main character’s evolution into a being who recognizes moral laws leads him to violate them for consequentialist reasons).
Blade Runner (directors cut): for so many reasons (identity, existentialism, updating of Homeric themes)
and, if we include TV:
STNG: Darmok. Theories of language, intercultural communication, Todorov.
Virtually any episode of the Decalogue.
M: insanity versus responsibility
Black Robe: contrast of Indian and Christian mysticism
Harakiri: the meaning of honor
Little Murders: why care?
The Meaning Of Life: the title song is terrrific
The Lathe Of Heaven: dream and causality
Dark Star: have you tried phenomenology?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review