Zell ‘I am a Democrat because we are the party of hope’ Miller says John Kerry has been more wrong, more weak and more wobbly than any other national figure. Except maybe that guy who delivered Clinton’s keynote a decade or so ago and is delivering Bush’s now. What’s his name again?
Miller could have used some bits of the Bush Twins Speech to better effect than they did. “And as to my fifty year career in the Democratic Party … Well, when I was young and irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible!” Would’ve played much better.
Anyway, all in all a ringing endorsement of the the cardinal conservative virtues of steadfastness, loyalty, constancy and, in the words of another well-known Democrat a “partisan,” “crude” and “gob-smackingly vile” effort “jammed with bald lies, straw men, and hateful rhetoric.” Vote for Bush because Zell Miller told you Kerry flip-flops and we shouldn’t change horses in midstream.
Careful. You’re liable to get yourself shot.
(Seriously, I’ve kinda thought this for awhile, and now regret that I didn’t say anything, since it certainly would’ve looked prescient: Is Zell Miller maybe a couple of years senile? It doesn’t look any better for Republicans that they’ve embraced him, but that certainly looks to me like the easiest way to explain Miller’s behavior.)
Watch your back if Zigzag Zell ever calls you a “good friend”:
From http://miller.senate.gov/speeches/030101jjdinner.htm
Introduction of Senator John Kerry
Democratic Party of Georgia’s
Jefferson-Jackson Dinner
March 1, 2001
My job tonight is an easy one: to present to you one of this nation’s authentic heroes, one of this party’s best-known and greatest leaders – and a good friend.
He was once a lieutenant governor – but he didn’t stay in that office 16 years, like someone else I know. It just took two years before the people of Massachusetts moved him into the United States Senate in 1984.
In his 16 years in the Senate, John Kerry has fought against government waste and worked hard to bring some accountability to Washington.
Early in his Senate career in 1986, John signed on to the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Bill, and he fought for balanced budgets before it was considered politically correct for Democrats to do so.
John has worked to strengthen our military, reform public education, boost the economy and protect the environment. Business Week magazine named him one of the top pro-technology legislators and made him a member of its “Digital Dozen.”
John was re-elected in 1990 and again in 1996 – when he defeated popular Republican Governor William Weld in the most closely watched Senate race in the country.
John is a graduate of Yale University and was a gunboat officer in the Navy. He received a Silver Star, Bronze Star and three awards of the Purple Heart for combat duty in Vietnam. He later co-founded the Vietnam Veterans of America.
Kieran, you missed the part where Miller challenged Chris Matthews to a duel.
I am having a hard time getting my mind around this Zell Miller since I lived in Georgia when he was Governor (back when he was young and irresponsible, ie a Democrat) and I find myself wondering what I missed. Was he a whackjob then? Or did that happen when he changed teams?
that hardball interview was hilarious. i dont think he heard anything after he thought chris mathews accused him of calling kerry a supporter of starving babies.
Look upon the face of compassionate conservatism and despair.
Or not.
judging by their web pages, you’ll notice in the page 1 story the major newspapers are mostly presenting the “barrage” at kerry and a duplication of quotations from the speech with nothing really critical inbetween. generally he said she said sort of stuff. this includes the new york times, asociated press, etc.
there were a lot of critical comments about obvious inconsistencies on cnn the television station, but you wouldn’t know that looking at their web page. obvious inconsistencies pointed out by pundits do find their way into the “hard” news stories, but it’s about 20 talking points per 1 contradiction or alternative characterization
some of this other stuff is eventually picked up, but it should be obvious that several news cycles is enough to run with anything, whatever eventual correction.
I liked that he claimed that Kerry would be bad in the war on terror becuase he’d not supported boondoggle like the B-1 or the partriot missle, or the F-14 (when? when we thought it might be needed, or now, when it has no mission?) Note, of course, that none of these has any role at all in the “war on terror” and that the B-1, especially, was never an effective wepon. (I’m quoting from Bainbridge’s account here, so I may have it wrong.)
Don’t forget, Miller is the senator from a welfare state. That is Georgia gets more money from the US gov’t than it pays in taxes. Miller is nothing more than a number of the welfare queens that people like him try to denigrate.
Last night’s convention was a hatefilled bitterfest and Zell was the King’s Wazir whipping the mob to frenzy. What were they swilling?
Then Zell went on to Chris Mathews and I felt a slippage and reality skewed and everything became fauxreal.
matt, don’t forget that the Patriot missile of the Gulf War I era was revealed to have been far less effective than it seemed at the time (10% success rate).
Moreover, the Patriot c. “Gulf War II-The Vengeance For What Those Different People Did” was responsible for shooting down one friendly (British Tornado) and had another battery shot at
by a friendly (US F-16) upon which it had locked.
(see : 60 Minutes report from earlier this year.)
Opposing weapons systems that (a) don’t work right in one case and (b) place friendlies in further danger after they are updated is probably a position that’s supported by most people, except those who really do hate the troops ;)
I also don’t see where he came down hard on Bush’s SecDef who canned a high-profile weapons system.
The fearmongering and mindless rah-rah boosterism of weapons systems is bad enough, but the lack of commitment to truth and standards of evidence is appalling in its own right.
Yeah, that speech was the most disgusting spittle-flecked spectacle I’ve seen in a while. It was sick. And then his insane appearance with Chris Matthews. I’m at a loss.
The episode gave Daily Kos a kick FARKwise. Yes, Senator Miller does LOOK like Senator Palpatine.
Here are 5 points why Zell’s speech will win Bush the election:
Huh!?
How about point 6 - undecided voters are now out of play for the GOP, just like after Buchanan’s speach in ‘92.
Justin, I have to tell you that I was wondering at several points last night whether Zell Miller was a trojan horse that the Democrats sent to destroy the Republicans.
Hey Justin -
I’m prepared to give the political reasons you wrote about a bit of consideration. But I have a question: How seriously should I take your analysis given that in your previous post you label Paul Krugman, John Galbraith and others “economic girly men” while citing as your authorities the likes of Donald “Stalker” Luskin and Jim “Dow 36,000” Glassman?
How about point 6 - undecided voters are now out of play for the GOP, just like after Buchanan’s speach in ‘92.
I don’t think so. To be an undecided voter after four years of Bush means that you are a profoundly, heroically stupid person. I mean, Republicans have an excuse — they’re motivated by hatred and bloodlust. Some very intelligent people have been motivated by hatred and bloodlust to do great things.
(Which is another thing — it’s not like it’s hard to think of popular political movements led by rabid maniacs shrieking for blood. Why do liberals assume that it won’t play in Peoria? I think this is a very clever move by Republicans, who have caught the Dems flatfooted yet again.)
Anyway, anyone who’s still undecided is probably undecided because whatever thought is in their head is the last thing that they heard. If they were watching last night, they probably thought “Hmm, he makes some good points. And I didn’t know John Kerry hated America.”
Actually, I think people who are undecided at this point are undecided because their issues are split. With the war in Iraq, both candidates are for it, so that’s no help. If this hypothetical undecided is anti-choice (Bush) but also anti-Federal Marriage Amendment (Kerry), social issues may be a wash. On the economy and education, she likes vouchers (Bush) but doesn’t like having a higher middle class tax burden (Kerry).
Undecideds aren’t stupid, but the image of the party can become important to them, and they’re less likely to approve of spittle-flecked rage.
K-
The point of my previous post was to identify who these “economic girlie men” are. Krugman and Galbaith are decidedly pessimistic about the current economy. I think you made my point about Glassman and others. His previous prognostication of Dow 36,000 is obviously not “girlie” on it’s face, Krugman’s doom and gloom is (according to Arnold).
So, I take it, Justin, that you think the Dow really did go to 36,000 and all us “girly men” just didn’t notice? Is strutting, posturing macho really the key to effective economic policy?
Well, strutting and postering seems to be par for the course on all policy in the current admin. And Zowie! it’s practically 1999 out there!
In all zell’s looniness, i pretty much like the duel idea.
Think about the new intellectual universes that facing real violence would open to our turgid, milifetish rightwingers!
Think about the effects on civility in politics! “Take that back, or take a sword!”
You know, it really works. The last political duel in france was in the ‘70 iirc (first blood, but yet). The assembly was perceptibly quieter for a while afterwards.
Great idea i tell you.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review