Mark Dery on the political blogosphere:
But bloggers who want to remedy what ails the corporate McMedia monopoly should grab a clue from Chris Allbritton and haul their larval, jack-studded flesh up out of their Matrix-like pods and do some goddamn reporting instead of just getting all meta about Instapundit’s post about The Daily Kos’s post about Little Green Footballs’s post about the vast left-wing media conspiracy’s latest act of high treason. It’s the Yertle the Turtle syndrome: Pundits stacked on top of pundits on top of pundits, all the way down, and, at the very bottom of the heap, the lowly hack who kicked off the whole frenzy of intertextuality: the reporter who dared venture out of the media airlock to collect some samples of Actual, Reported Fact.
Ha! Sounds right to me.
I don’t know what this “fact” thing is that he’s on about, but it sounds scary and I’ll have nothing to do with it. Damn hippies.
If there’s something more removed from reality than webloggers engaged in a self-referential discussion, it’s webloggers engaged in a self-referential discussion about how webloggers engage in a self-referential discussion. And now, of course, I’m discussing (self-referentially) how webloggers are engaged in a self-referential discussion about how webloggers engage in a self-referential discussion.
It’s self-referential all the way up (including this comment, of course).
My head hurts—must be Russell’s Paradox and ZF burrowing up from my subconsciousness after yer post, Brad.
I think Mark Dery has it right: why aren’t more bloggers out there schlepping it old-school like George Orwell or Rimbaud (or, more recently, Bruce Chatwin or Ted Conover)? If small socialist presses could float Orwell’s rambles, why couldn’t a blog to which the loafers all directed micropayments?
Also: Wunderkammer/Cornell — is this original w/Mark? It’s a good Idea (or better: eidolon).
Well, I do wonder why anyone would think that the blogosphere would be any different from, oh, any other aspect of human behavior. For example, the primary use the telephone - even before cell phones - is to spread gossip and yack about inane, inconsequential matters regarding your immediate social sphere and daily life. The main use of email is to spread spam. Heck, I think the bulk of the actual bits that are shoveled around the Internet is actually just spam email. The rest is porn.
But I guess it is part of a cycle. People start using a new communication tool. People start using it for serious stuff, and sooner or later a new class of critics pop up to tell everyone how horribly they’re doing it. And then the organization geeks start demanding everyone sign codes, pledges, requiring membership cards and holding conferences on how people can improve their ethical use of gossip, hearsay and innuendo.
Not that there’s anything wrong with all this. But it should be predictable cycle by now…
Nice writing.
But too little too late.
Like Billmon reentering the fray after playing coward during the heat of the election battle.
The media wars are over.
In other words:
Meet your Master liberal…
Bw dwn nd lck Krl Rvs ft gl ss
Tsts gd dsnt t?
Ymm ym ym nj tht cnsrvtv trtl sht
… ll th w dwn
Ya’all didn’t want to join the battle…
Oh well…
I just put $20,000 clams down on a Walmart bond…
My only question is…
What’s the second best way to make a buck
n th typcl stpd mrcn Chrstn fck…
At one point in Spring 2004, Tacitus started an abortive fundraising drive for a trip to Iraq. I think work responsibilities got in the way.
My theory of the internet, which is mine, which I however share with A. Elk (that is to say, Miss Ann Elk), who is not an elk, is as follows:
Blogs aren’t primarily content originators, especially not in reporting. They do fact-checking, and they re-edit the legit media by digging up stories that the legit media puts on page 16 with a misleading headline and with the lede buried in the seventh paragraph — i.e., the I.F. Stone function.
When blogs are content originators, it’s as opinion writers. And in fact, at least 5% of the American population can write opinion as well as David Broder.
(That has to be what people mean when they call Broder “the dean of American pundits”. That seems like sort of an odd use of the term, but what else could they be trying to say?)
:) Very appropriate
I sometimes feel that way about academic literature in general. In my good moods, I think this is a good way of refining ideas until they work, in my bad moods …
Boy, do I need to get my thesis off my back.
Hal, I haven’t noticed a lot of phoners phoning each other to say how phoning is going to replace journalism.
Interesting, because I would have said that what reporters do is almost the opposite of what most of us would consider (i) research or (ii) a reliable path to the truth. How often do reporters go to a library and look something up? Most reporters wouldn’t consider that to be reporting at all. Getting an interview with a named or, frequently, anonymous, source, and “getting the quote” is the only thing that reporters consider “real reporting.” For example, during the “Memogate” episode, surely most of us considered the analysis of typefaces, spacing etc. on various internet sources to be dispositive. Yet the traditional media gave very little weight to this analysis, and a lot of attention to the views of the official’s secretary about the memos’ authenticity.
Because reporting is based on quotes rather than research and analysis, it is almost useless for academic purposes. Osborne Elliott (a noted journalist) once claimed that journalism was dedicated to producing “the first rough draft of history,” but the documents and analysis of the same that are the foundation of history have no place in journalism.
Hal’s still right about the new media, and Sturgeon’s law still applies: 90% of everything is crap. (Yeah, yeah, my stuff too. Chill out.)
But here’s a question: Why aren’t bloggers going to city council meetings, communicating with their representatives, and at least doing research on local issues? This is stuff they could do at a very small cost—nothing, certainly, like traveling to Iraq.
How about it, bloggers: Can we start writing about the local issues, which we at least have a decent shot at covering?
Back during the party conventions, when bloggers were invited to actually come and witness an actual (if somewhat contrived) media event, there was scant evidence of any reportorial competence. I’d have thought that more of them would have gotten the idea of stashing the laptop and actually going out and talking with people for a while, or even if laptop-bound doing man-on-the-street-style reporting with a confederate on a cell phone.
“This just in… Blogs all over the internet say that TV media is worthless… citing facts that illustrate medias complete inability to actually report on anything… were going to the Instapundit blog right now… Im dan rather and Im currently typing in a comment on Instapundit. It appears as though after I have entered my comment it appears on the screen as I have typed it. were going live washington:
“Dan, our experts have confirmed that it is in fact possible to comment on blogs. We have Harvard Doctorates here who have confirmed this fact.
“An interesting development ladies and gentlemen… we will return to Instapundit later after a report on the westminster dog show. good night….
It’s true that the average blogger isn’t a war reporter, but the proportion of news that comes from reporters actually going out and finding things isn’t that great. In a lot of cases, the starting point is press releases, statistical announcements, sporting matches, academic articles and conferences and so on. Bloggers can and do go to these sources directly.
Some of us are trying. It IS possible. It’s not easy, but it’s possible.
Some advice:
1) Mooch off the foreign english-speaking press, they’re better than ours. England, Canada, Australia, and Israel.
2) If you notice a story based on public documents or some statistical studies—go to the documents themselves. Chances are a daily newspaper reporter has skimmed a bit, and sometimes they’ve missed something really, really important.
I may have uncovered, for the first time, a real story this way, and an important story. I haven’t actually blogged about it, I’ve been nagging reporters who have the resources to follow up instead. But I wouldn’t have found it if I’d never blogged, so it sort of counts.
3) Pick a subject or a story that really interests you, and make it your own. You can make yourself an expert, and by reading all the different reporters’ work you’ll get a sense of the bigger picture that daily reporters don’t see, or you can draw conclusion they’re not allowed to publish because that would be biased. Google News makes this easy to do.
4) It is frustrating, that the most substantive things you do will almost inevitably not get the most attention, and the Powerlines of the world will inevitably get more attention than Iraq the Model (my favorite of the Iraqi blogs—he’d be a hell of a foreign correspondent.)
But the value of blogs is that they’re an amplification device. The “Actual Reported Fact” would, in their absence, have been buried on p. 40 of some provincial newspaper that few read. Consider the example of the Cosgrove miscarriage reporting bill. The blogs (not just the political blogs, either; there’s a bunch of reproduction-centered blogs which picked it up, too) publicised it, each picking it up from another, and caused Cosgrove to withdraw it.
An amplification device with no inputs just generates feedback, of course: the high-pitched whine of the echo chamber. That’s what Dery’s complaining about. But that’s a consequence of pundits all the way down, anchored on no Actual Reported Fact.
Someone mentioned the “I.F. Stone function above”….my parents bought me his collected columns from the weekly as a college graduation present, back when I was trying to be a journalist. This strikes me as a wonderful mission statement for a weblog:
“I tried to give information which could be documented so the reader could check it for himself. I tried to dig the truth out of hearings, official transcripts and government documents, and to be as accurate as possible. I also sought to give the Weekly a personal flavor, to add humor, wit and good writing to the Weekly report. I felt if one were able enough and had sufficient vision one could distill meaning, truth and even beauty from the swiftly flowing debris of the week’s news….
The reporter assigned to specific beats lie the State Department or the Pentagon for a wire service or a big daily newspaper soon finds himself a captive. State and Pentagon have large press relations forces whose job it is to herd the press and shape the news. There are many ways to punish a reporter who gets out of line; if a big story breaks at 3 A.M., the press office may neglect to notify him while his rivals get the story. There are as many ways to flatter and take a reporter into camp—private off-the-record dinners with high officials, entertainment at the service clubs. Reporters tend to be absorbed by the bureaucracies they cover; they take on the habits, attitudes and even accents of the military or the diplomatic corps. Should a reporter resist the pressure, there are many ways to get rid of him….
But a reporter covering the whole capital on his own—particularly if he is his own employer—is immune from these pressures. Washington is full of news—if one story is denied him he can always get another. The bureaucracies put out so much that they cannot help letting the truth slip from time to time. The town is open.”
—I.F. Stone, Introduction to The Haunted Fifties.
“Powerlines of the world will inevitably get more attention than Iraq the Model (my favorite of the Iraqi blogs—he’d be a hell of a foreign correspondent.)”
D’oh. Brain freeze. Healing Iraq, I meant. (Nothing against Iraq the Model, but I don’t even read it.)
Jason wrote: But here’s a question: Why aren’t bloggers going to city council meetings, communicating with their representatives, and at least doing research on local issues?
There are at least a couple of local bloggers here in Portland who will at least talk to local city government folk (or even have them leave comments). The best of them is The One True b!X, who does an extraordinary amount of high-quality original reporting about local Portland politics, and is constantly struggling for the funding to keep himself and his blog going.
I’m not sure if any other cities have a b!X-like blogger, though…
Ears… burning…
Anyway, there’s a rather abnormal amount of local blogging activity taking place in Greensboro, NC, including elected officials and, yes, people reporting from things like official city and county sessions.
Blogging city council meetings? Please! I already have a mother (a member back in the 70’s and still a force in various groups), local papers, council meetings broadcast live on Tuesdays … even our local alternative weekly figures our city doesn’t need more coverage.
Come to think of it, though, this highly politicized community might not be the worst place to start a blog, whether or not we need one:
Our newest beach front resort hotel wants to expand its recently acquired 9-hole golf course onto the adjoining wilderness park. The developers are presenting their case to the County Supervisors, whose elections they funded. 1309 comments
I’d like to take exception to y81’s comment above that reporters don’t actually contribute to history. They do collect eyewitness accounts soon after the event, which is valuable, perishable material, no matter how undependable.
It sounds like sour grapes to me. For the first time in a very long time the mainstream news media is being held accountable and responsible for what it reports. That is the basic intent of many a blog. As to the political aspect of blogging, just because, at the moment, the right of center bloggers are more organized and better scribes than those to the left of center means nothing. In the end it is the reader who will make the difference.
Hell, yeah! Most bloggers live to mock the media. And most of posting I’ve seen is derivative.
Though their significance as a primary sources may be lost through the volume of voices.
First hand reporting is an noble idea but how do we filter out the original from all the background noise?
There’s plenty of room at the bottom.
Moreover, if someone does go out and dig up an Actual, Reported Fact, it’s often quite difficult to figure out how to get it further publicized. If it’s part of a national scandal, sure, there can be plenty of echoing. But who will ever hear a random blogger’s account of a city council meeting, if it doesn’t feed into some sort of bigger media? (whether paper or net). At that point, one is simply a volunteer “stringer”.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review