In today’s FT, Samuel Brittan reviews John Gillingham’s European Integration, 1950-2003 : Superstate or New Market Economy?. One interesting snippet, which I knew about but deserves wider publicity:
Readers may be more surprised to find the name of Frederich Hayek given as the source of the alternative neoliberal interpretation. For most of today’s self-proclaimed Hayekians view everything to do with the EU with intense suspicion. Indeed I was sufficiently surprised myself to look up some of Hayek’s writings on the subject. Although he played no part in the post war institutional discussion, he had written at some length on the problems of federalism in the late 1930s. Hayek was among those who believed that some form of federalism, whether in Europe or on a wider basis, was an important step towards a more peaceful world. In a 1939 essay, remarkably anticipating the EU Single Market Act, he argued that a political union required some elements of a common economic policy, such as a common tariff, monetary and exchange rate policy, but also a ban on intervention to help particular producers.
“France to Continue Bailouts Despite Criticism by Europe”
Glyn Morgan’s article on European integration in the spring issue of Critical Review also talked about this. Hayek, following Lord Acton, was committed to the view that etatism was partly a result of nationalism and of the identification of nation with state, meaning that it would be easier to preserve liberalism in a multinational polity than in a national one. (Nationalist- social democrats, such as David Miller, agree with the prognosis and take the opposite policy conclusion.)
I have a lot of sympathy with this line of reasoning. But it leads to a funny sort of day-to-day position: supporting European integration as long as it doesn’t work too well; preferring Brussels to national capitals as long as most Europeans don’t do the same. If people ever start feeling as much sentimental attachment to Europe as to their nations, the project will have succeeded too well and some of its crucial benefits will be lost.
These include, btw, the European zone of peace. Because people aren’t willing to kill and die for the EU, and they no longer have opportunity or motive to kill and die in intra-European wars— peace. If people are ever willing to kill and die for Europe, then Europe becomes just another giant military power. And that’s part of Hayek’s argument, too, more or less. (There’s a reason why he wrote the essay in 1939, after all.)
At first glance, it’s not surprising that someone who grew up in the last days of the Habsburg Empire should have views on federalism. After all, its body politic had been at least quasi-federal for several decades, since Ferenc Deak had helped negotiate the great compromise for the Hungarians in 1867 (or so, memory fades).
And at second glance, maybe it’s not so surprising that Hayek plumped for federalism that didn’t work very well but tried to do right by everyone. That seems a succinct description of what Austria-Hungary tried to be in its dotage. So was Hayek simply nostalgic for the world of his youth?
+++
“Herr von Habsburg, are you going to watch the football match on television tonight?”
“Who’s playing?”
“It’s Austria-Hungary”
“Yes, but against whom?”
No doubt— though I think “simply” is unfair. There have been worse things to be nostalgic for than the late Hapsburg Empire, especially when one is an Austrian writing after the Anschluss. And for Acton, too, the Hapsburg experience was important; he saw that if the principle of nationality was allowed full play in eastern and central Europe, the results would not be pretty. His view, at least, wasn’t one of personal attachment— he was English. And Hayek— unlike, oddly, Isaiah Berlin— said for decades thet he felt more genuinely British than anything else. He certainly seems to have understood that the Vienna of his youth was irretrievably lost.
Yes, I read the Critical Review piece recently. It was very interesting, but only because it laid out the heart of the problem the EU faces. We begin with the assumption that we want more integration, and then we have to come up with reasons to explain why.
Using Hayek to support EU integration is a little like using Tom Paine to support re-electing Bush. “Vote for me, and you’ll never have to pay taxes to the British without adequate representation in Parliament.” Yeah, well we weren’t doing that anyway.
France and Germany seem to be forever off of the brink. Free trade is there within the borders, and the fact of greater integration doesn’t seem destined to, by itself, kill the agricultural policy. (French farmers want it then, European farmers want it now.)
I agree with Jacob, as well, that the advantages Hayek assumes only work if the EU doesn’t become as integrated as the USA, where no one thinks twice about jobs “disappearing” from the Midwest to Atlanta, or New York taxes going to ethanol subsidies in Iowa. Once “they” become “us”, it doesn’t matter if We are a Country or a Continent.
(No one cares about jobs moving from the Midwest to the Sunbelt, except of course the state governors, mayors, city and county councils, state business development departments, state legislatures - and that’s just the people in government. When UPS moved its headquarters to Atlanta, not least because its employees could afford twice the house that they could in Connecticut, it was a big deal indeed. The latest duel between South Carolina and Georgia for a Mercedes production plant was page one above-the-fold news in both states. There is relentless and ruthless competition for businesses and jobs, and the debate over whether tax holidays and other subsidies actually do any good is a hot one too.)
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review