One of the drawbacks of Development as Freedom is that it really is very repetitive and very similar points supported by the same examples and quotations recur less than 100 pages apart. In several places, though, he makes a good and important about markets and the freedom to transact:
In recent discussions, the focus in assessing the market mechanism has tended to be on results it ultimately generates, such as the incomes or utilities yielded by markets. This is not a negligible issue ….. But the more immediate case for the freedom of market transaction lies in the basic importance of that freedom itself. We have good reasons to buy and sell, to exchange, and to seek lives that can flourish on the basis of transactions. To deny that freedom in general would be in itself a major failing of society. This fundamental recognition is prior to any theorem we may or may not be able to prove … in showing what the culmination outcomes of markets are in terms of incomes, utilities and so on. (p. 112)
Yes, I’m well into it now, and there is quite a lot of repetition. It’s still interesting though - but I’m skimming in places.
One thing I really wondered about though - the table on page 50 that illustrates two great surges in life expectancy in England and Wales in the 20th century. Sen is arguing that they coincide with and are also causally related to the two Wars - that rationing improved health overall. But staring at the table, I was surprised by the height of one column, and putting aside Sen’s case for a moment, just wondered about it. The column for 1941-50, it was. The 40s, I thought; what…? Oh! Antibiotics.
So I looked up the antibiotics section in Roy Porter’s history of medicine, and as I thought, the 40s is when they were really being developed. Well, that made a massive difference in life expectancies - yet Sen doesn’t mention it. That does seem like an oversight, to me.
Sounds plausible. Though would antibiotics have made a big difference then or in the following decade? I’ve no idea when they would have become available for ordinary general practitioners to prescribe to the hoi polloi - but I’m sure someone does.
Well, Porter does talk about that. Antibiotics already made a huge difference in treating war wounds, and also in cutting the mortality from pneumonia from 30% to something single digit - maybe 7%. More of them did get developed in the following decade, but they were already cutting mortality rates in the 40s. So that big spike - it seems to me it must be partly due to antibiotics, as well as rationing. It’s so very tall…
One of the drawbacks of Development as Freedom is that it really is very repetitive and very similar points supported by the same examples and quotations recur less than 100 pages apart.
There are two main reasons for this, I think. Firstly, Sen, despite his philosophical and artistic leanings (mostly due very much to the milieu of the mid-20 century bhadralok that he comes from; rather than any original contributions in this regard) still basically thinks and writes like an economist, and any familiarity with economists trying to write generalised texts means that there is an awful lot of repetition and recurrence going on. Not always the most imaginative of people in the literary sphere, our economist cousins. Secondly, much of Sen’s work tends to flow in certain increasing cycles; a lot of the thinking behind ‘Development and Freedom’ can be traced back to his early theoretical work, that was slowly applied to empirical case studies in India and other LDC countries and then gradually extrapolated out to a more globalised level. This pattern of thought means that a considerable level of repetition on differing scales will be inevitable. For example, if you read his “India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity” you will realise that he uses exactly the same arguments and approach, confined to a national level, that crop up in “Development as Freedom”.
Most of his really rigorous work, which tends to more concise and without any of the excess padding, can be found in the slimmer volumes “Economic Inequality Re-examined” and “Choice, Welfare and Measurement”. Which unfortunately tend to be rather drier and less hospitable to non-specialists.
Yes, I have a copy of Inequality Re-examined, which I’ve been meaning to read for ages, and all the more so just lately because I’ve been reading, as I mentioned, Nussbaum’s Sen-influenced work. So now I’m even more motivated to do so, despite dryness.
It’s interesting how collaborative and multi-disciplinary all these people are. All the articles and books Nussbaum has written or edited with other people - lots of different other people. Sen, too. It seems like enough work for five or ten lifetimes. Very impressive.
Is not the repetitive aspect of this work the result of it being a recopilation from previous works?
I can easily imagine that each chapter was a one time an article by itself, so it would include some information, that in the book is plainly redundant, so the reader has not to look any other place to get a background.
DSW
Re Ophelia’s point, that the massive improvement in the health of the UK population 1941-50 might well have been caused, at least in part, by antibiotics:
I’d need to look this up in a history of British medicine, but I am convinced that antibiotics were not very widely available to the British population in 1941-50. Of course, before 1941 they weren’t available at all: but I’m sure
their use for the first 10 years in Britain was rationed, and went disproportionately towards the victims of bombing and battlefield wounds, rather than towards those suffering from, say, bronchial infections. Two anecdotal pieces of evidence: Denis Forman’s (excellent) autobiography ‘To Reason Why’ mentions how he was severely wounded at Monte Cassino in 1943, and would have died had he been an Other Rank; as an Officer, he was entitled to the limited supply of antibiotics. And seven years later, George Orwell died of TB at a time when American doctors would simply have prescribed a course of antibiotics. I also think there’s a discussion in Corelli Barnett’s ‘The Audit of War’ of how British (and Australian and emigre Russian) scientists first developed antibiotics, but how their mass production was left to the Americans. Certainly I suspect that there may have been some antibiotic effect on mortality in the UK in 1941-50, but I would suspect that the drugs were too rare to explain most of the changes that Sen notes.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review