Seeing as Kevin is wondering whether M&Ms have gotten smaller since the last time he looked1, my imponderable for the day is this: Why is it that in Europe (at least in my experience) patients with a sprained ankle or whatever are typically issued with forearm crutches whereas in the U.S. you get underarm crutches. It seems clear to me that the underarm kind is inferior in every important respect. So why does it survive in the U.S.?
Possible explanations:
Alternative explanations (perhaps even informative ones) are invited.
1 Perhaps they are simply further away than before?
My bet is on the cultural-economic QWERTY path. Crutches of the underarm type have been around for a very long time, and there’s already an industry grown up around them to manufacture and supply them. It may also stem from the stigma of polio. People with forearm crutches ‘appear’ to be more significantly afflicted, and hence it assumes a more permanent cast, as in ‘Gee, she looks like she’ll have that for a very long time’. There are forearm crutches used in the US, they are typically used for much more serious and lasting injuries, where the user is likely to use the crutches everyday. This is where their efficiency pays off. The dividends of this may not be obvious to someone with a fleeting injury that might last only weeks. It’s my bet that the costs are somewhat greater for the forearm crutch too. Therefore, like QWERTY, it grew up from being ‘good enough’ for a couple of centuries, and has not changed much except for material composition.
Categories like “sprained ankle” are culturally dependent, socially constructed realities. Crutches are merely crutches for these social constructions. il n’y pas de hors crutch
-because forearm crutches are for sissies?
-because I paid for a crutch damnit, so I want my money’s worth!
-because it requires some thought, and American hospitals don’t want to be liable for non-thinking American patients
-because with a ‘real’ crutch, you can grab it with both hands and beat an attacker over the head with it (assuming you can balance on one leg). With one of those forearm jobbies you’d probably thump yourself on the back of the head, thereby doing the attacker’s work for him
Prices of forearm crutches on your linked-to page: $99, $125
Price of underarm crutches on your linked-to page: $45
Maybe underarm crutches are just cheaper to make?
I think it’s a signalling mechanic.
Those giant, unwieldy underarm crutches are iconic - they’re what Americans envision when they hear the word “crutch”. Everyone who injures themselves gets issued a pair, so lurching around on them becomes a signal that you are recently injured and are likely to be fine in a few weeks.
Those efficient forearm crutches are used primarily by the long-term (or permanently) handicapped. Their presence signals that the user has a very serious and possibly permanent ailment or disfiguration, since they have gone to the trouble of procuring fancy, efficient crutches.
If someone comes into my coffee shop, clumsily maneuvering on big underarm crutches, I assume that he just twisted his ankle or broke his leg skiing - probably overdid it while pursuing an active lifestyle. If someone comes into my coffee shop defty wielding aluminum forearm crutches, I assume that they’ve got some serious problem (paraplegic? birth defect?) which triggers a serious of cultural constructs (handicapped = diseased = bad person = deserves shunning, careful - it might be catching!).
I’m not sure why there’s such a divide between Europe and the US in this regard. Are people’s attitudes and public policy towards the homeless markedly different between the two? (serious question)
Goodness. My European sensibilities identify underarm crutches as “old-fashioned”, “technologically inferior” and “what poor people in old movies use”. I was astonished to see people in America using them. They seem so, well, low-tech and kind of, well, OLD.
Fancy that - you guys LIKE them! Peculiar.
Not crutches but hip joints.
according to one manufacturer of hip joints the UK uses old fashioned joints because they were pioneered in the UK. The originator struck a deal with a manufacturer which ensured a very good price in return for some degree of exclusivity, certainly including standard training for orthopaedic surgeons. Initially this did a lot for hip replacement in the UK but over time there has been substantial progress in hip joints and they leave the UK using a process that is less reliable and takes much longer to perform meaning more risk to the patient and fewer operations. A case of first is worst I suppose.
As for crutches, I imagine the price of forearm crutches would fall if they were used in the same quantities as underarm models. I wonder if there are multiple equilibria in the markets for crutches. I propose a geographical explanation. Just as with cars Americans drive clearly inferior but mauch larger models. Europe doesn’t have the wide open spaces that make gas guzzlers, SUVs and underarm crutches a viable option.
Regrettably, I think the answer may be that there is a limit to the amount of weight you can support on a forearm crutch, but you can use an underarm crutch for people who are a lot fatter.
The underarm crutch is the saturday night special of prostheses. Poke! Whack! Trip!
I wonder if the forearm crutch is harder to learn and so problematical if you have a temporary injury?
In Australia, I think we go for underarms. It may also be that they have a larger range of adjustments when you borrow them from the hospital. Is there a nexus between forearm crutches and more modern casts for broken legs?
We use them because that’s all they offer us. Based on experience!
Jared Diamond explained it in “Guns, Germs, and Steel”. Obviously, there were two independent inventions of crutches, one in the old world, and one in the new. Few tree species were appropriate for crutches on the two continents, and the European species were only suited for shorter forearm crutches. East/west diffusion of rival crutch technologies was limited by ocean barriers, which is why New Guineans are as smart as anybody and seldom sprain their ankles.
I’ve had to use crutches for extended periods several times in my life and have friends with permanent disabilities that require them, so I’ve got an actual answer.
Part of it is that, yes, forearm crutches are more expensive here. Part of it is that they’re also associated in many minds here with serious and generally permanent disabilities - for people with multiple dystrophy, say. One of the archetypal charitable fundraising images for the MD telethon, March of Dimes, and the like is of the kid with heavy corrective lenses, spinal or major limb deformation, and forearm crunches, gimping along.
It’s worth noting that the forearm crunch is generally superior, at least in my experience, but not in hugely clear-cut fashion. In particular it’s not an improvement if you’re coping with shoulder, upper chest, or upper arm damage; it can hurt like hell to brace yourself for the next step, depending on what’s messed up there. And since one of the classic pools of crutch users is the football player who may well have been injured by a bad tackle, there’s some reinforcement for underarm crutch use there.
So the forearm crutch goes under-used, for a combination of medical and cultural reasons.
Actually, things like the Standard Oil joke explanation are depressingly common in medical supply. That stuff is weird, and only when it gets really blatant (as in the recent bill forbidding the government to negotiate better rates on drugs) does the public ever notice it. But a recurring comment from literate friends of mine whose conditions require frequent care is that they just can’t read authors like Kafka anymore, because it’s too damn true.
Could it be that you’re not comparing the right things? That is, my impression (completely anecdotal) is that in the US, people are given these anderarm crutches for injuries that get you perhaps a cane at best in Europe. Whereas if you have the type of injury that would give you a forearm crutch in Europe, you’re put in a wheelchair in the US. This is probably a bit exaggerated, but I think there may be something to it. (You’d need to be comparing treatment of same/very similar injuries, and I suspect you don’t have info to know if that’s what you’re doing.) The question I always used to have along these lines was: Why was this person given a crutch at all (underarm) when they could likely walk around just find with a cane? And in that case, I just figured underarm crutches are more visible (cultural sign: I’ve been injured, I need special treatment) and more expensive, justifying higher costs. (A propos people’s comments that the underarm crutch is cheaper; since when does the American health care system care that it’s charging a patient a fortune for something as long as it can justify it in some way?)
I realize there is a bit of a flaw in my argument in that if the system doesn’t mind going for the more expensive treatment then that would mean they might as well give people the forearm crutch. I find the cultural argument somewhat convincing (stigma attached to forearm crutch vs underarm crutch), but still think that the cane/crutch question is relevant.
A Straussian would presumably hint that America is full of forearm crutches, and if you only knew what a true “forearm crutch” was you’d know it.
Because.
This probably isn’t related, but in medical practice, a lot of things just vary regionally. For example, if you’re having open surgery to fix an abdominal aortic anuerysm, you’re more likely to have a retroperitoneal incision if you’re in California and a vertical incision if you’re in the Midwest (or mayber it’s the other way around).
since when does the American health care system care that it’s charging a patient a fortune for something as long as it can justify it in some way?
The system wouldn’t care if it were charging a patient, but it’s normally charging an insurance company. Insurance companies are committed to limiting cost, even if it’s not what’s best for the patient, and insurance companies call the shots for the health care of most Americans.
kcindc - I realize that (but it’s fair for you to point it out since I didn’t comment on this in my note), nonetheless, costs seem extreme compared to what you pay for similar services elsewhere. So how do you explain that? Why aren’t insurance companies putting more pressure on hospitals not to charge $5/aspirin? (And are we conveniently forgetting about those who don’t have insurance to cover these crazy costs?)
As an aside for whats its worth not that I’d want to bother anyone but given how effortlessly sociological theorizing both fits the subject matter and underscores the folly…of both, it seems that theory might actually require a crutch involving more than the usual broom handle up the ….
For example, if you’re having open surgery to fix an abdominal aortic anuerysm, you’re more likely to have a retroperitoneal incision if you’re in California and a vertical incision if you’re in the Midwest (or mayber it’s the other way around).
I think it’s the other way round if you’re in the Southern Hemisphere?
Because Bush is gay.
It’s just because forearm crutches are used in Europe: they look French.
they look French.
And they’re called “cannes anglaises” in france.
The euro-plot thickens.
While forearm crutches more aesthetically pleasing (like, that’s a big requirement—?), are less unwieldly and probably easier to use, they have other consraints. I could use my hands while being propped up via underarms; not sure I could do the same using forearm crutches. And with both knees out of commission, I needed all the propping I could get.
The most obvious explanation is a faulty premise. The forearm crutches aren’t superior. Underarm crutches require less strength and allow the trunk of the body to lend support because the top of the crutch is squeezed between the upper arm and trunk. Their lower cost is another factor. European markets are less competitive and the forearm crutch makers have stifled competition.
I’ve never tried forearm crutches. I suppose I should. I don’t buy the notion that they are superor, though.
I’m an amputee, so I spend at least part of every day on crutches. As someone as already noted above, it’s possible to jam underarm crutches into your armpit and free up both hands. The first thing I do when I get out of bed in the morning is crutch over to the kitchen and make myself some coffee. With crutches fixed in my armpits, I am a stable tripod, and making coffee is no problem. I don’t see how I could do this with forearm crutches.
I also think getting up and down stairs would be harder with forearm crutches, though that may only be because I’ve never seen it done.
Why do most Americans prefer Chevies to BMWs?
…
Why do most Americans prefer Windows to Macintosh?
…
Why do most Americans prefer Wonder Bread to a whole-grain rustic loaf?
Why do most Americans prefer football to soccer?
There’s a small but respectable literature on crutch design - as previous commenters have pointed out, it’s really not a question of axillary vs. forearm, but a matter of which crutch is better for what purposes. Here’s a good summary article:
http://www.oandp.org/jpo/library/1993_01_020.asp
Speak softly and carry a big crutch?
Speak softly and carry a big crutch?
Postmodernist explanation: To state that more underarm crutches are used in Europe is to state a so-called “fact”. But, in fact, there are not facts, so there are no underarm crutches, and since underarm crutches are easier to use for womem and other oppressed people, their absence shows how oppessive our society is.
A crutch for a sprained ankle? What species of weenie needs a crutch for a sprained ankle?
“It seems clear to me that the underarm kind is inferior in every important respect.”
Why? Is this based on personal observation or a recent study?
Axillary crutches bear a higher percentage of user weight and are more stable. They require less training and result in fewer instability injuries. Acute injuries require that the injured leg bears no weight at all. For long-term use, all sorts of ambulatory devices are available, taylored to individual strength and preference. Usually, chronic disabilities are varied in the limitation of limb use, that is, some weight bearing is often possible. The forearm cruthes are preferred in those situations.
Great explanations, though.
“It seems clear to me that the underarm kind is inferior in every important respect.”
You’ve obviously never been on crutches before. That, or you’re just another anti-American bigot.
When I busted my ankle in America, my brother had a handy set of underarm crutches available. When I got back to the UK, I learned that they won’t give them to you here because they are afraid you’ll lean your full weight on them all the time and cut off the circulation to your arms.
My verdict: It’s much easier to balance with underarm crutches. So much so that I gave up on the sticks and rented a walker for the rest of the time I needed the assist.
None of these were any use to me on stairs, of course, which is a real pain given the design of your average London house.
Why can’t I resist commenting on this…. anyway
A good portion of the disparity is probably due to the fact that the American medical system likes using a “one-size fits all” approach. (Lots of reasons for this.)
Underarm crutches are overkill for most injuries, but also work on more serious injuries where an forearm crutch wouldn’t.
Along those lines, I’ve noticed crutches getting rare in general in the US. Wheelchairs are the default now. Again, just a one-size fits all overkill. Terribly inefficient, but it works.
As for price… Medical products have a very very weak correlation between price of production and sale price. If hospitals wanted to start issuing forearm crutches in the US, the price would come down pretty instantly. Right now, forearm crutches are expensive here because the people who buy them know that they are better (at least for them) and are being charged for having a clue.
The people I’ve seen with forearm crutches here in the US have been, as several people have noted, more likely to be encrutched for the long time if not permanently; they have also tended to be able to put at least some weight on their legs, as opposed to many of the people I see on underarm crutches (and as opposed to the person I recently WAS on underarm crutches) who are not putting any weight at all on the foot or leg in question. Is there a difference there? How easy is it to keep all your weight off one leg with forearm crutches?
(And while we’re discussing crutches, can I just say ow? I hate those things, although even a couple months after getting off them, I have more muscle definition in my arms than I ever did. But I’m not overweight and I’m in reasonably good shape — what do out-of-shape and/or fat people do when they have to be on crutches? I just don’t see how it’s possible.)
The people I’ve seen with forearm crutches here in the US have been, as several people have noted, more likely to be encrutched for the long time if not permanently; they have also tended to be able to put at least some weight on their legs, as opposed to many of the people I see on underarm crutches (and as opposed to the person I recently WAS on underarm crutches) who are not putting any weight at all on the foot or leg in question. Is there a difference there? How easy is it to keep all your weight off one leg with forearm crutches?
(And while we’re discussing crutches, can I just say ow? I hate those things, although even a couple months after getting off them, I have more muscle definition in my arms than I ever did. But I’m not overweight and I’m in reasonably good shape — what do out-of-shape and/or fat people do when they have to be on crutches? I just don’t see how it’s possible.)
I broke my ankle last year and was on underarm crutches for six weeks and it beefed my arms and shoulders up quite a bit.
Perhaps americans like to beef up more?
> How easy is it to keep all your weight off one leg with forearm crutches?
Easy. Although forearm crutches are less stable than underarms, and it’s very straightforward to go arse over tit if you hit a greasy patch of ground.
Can anyone who remembers the 19th century think of canes as anything but a weapon? Consider Charles Sumner being clobbered over the head and left for dead.
I’ve used a cane myself once or twice. Back problems. Haven’t hit anyone. Yet.
Brian: going up and down stairs is easier with forearm crutches assuming you have a hand-rail or banister, since you hold the unused rail-side crutch in the other hand. Without a rail, don’t even think of it.
When I broke my leg skiing (in France), managing stairs with the canne anglaise was the cricial examination for being let out.
Have you ever tried to cut down a branch off a tree and try to make a forearm crutch?
Americans have a history of carrying big sharp cutting knife things and makeing their own crutches from the nearest tree. It’s just a matter of finding a forked branch and a few cuts here and there and away you go on your genuine pioneer armpit crutch.
No tolerance for designer girlie-man forearms crutches.
Actually, i just like to say crutch.
Crutch, crutch, crutch, crutch, crutch.
I must agree with Jill. Underarm crutches got a feel in my mind of WWII movies. I’ve never seen underarm crutches being used IRL in Europe.
I myself have spent much of my youth on forearm crutches (due to several soccer injuries on foot and knee) and never experienced any problems with them. I even own my own pair because after a while I stopped bothering going to see a doc for another sprained ancle. I just brought out my crutches for a few weeks and stayed off my foot.
1. They are cheaper.
2. They allow a greater proportion of your weight to be passed through the crutch.
3. They allow weight bearing with your hands free by leaning on your armpits (not advised due to axillary nerve injuries).
4. I think that, because the early adopters of forearm crutches in the US were obviously impaired by Muscular Dystrophy or the like, while most axillary crutch users were clearly temporarily disabled by a broken leg, say, forearm crutches were stigamtized in some people’s minds as being for disabled people.
5. They are cheaper.
eszter - in america any non-old person who uses a cane is a pimp.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review