It is not often that a dissertation gets written up in the New York Times so I thought it was worth a mention here. Kieran has written here about Devah Pager’s work earlier including a bit of context. Since Devah is a friend of mine, I would like to add that not only is she really smart and great at finding innovative approaches to research questions, but she’s also a delightful person. It’s wonderful to have people like her in academia and in sociology in particular using her talents to work on important questions… and it’s also nice to see good academic work get public recognition for a change!
Update: Be sure to check out Kieran’s note in the comments for more details about the public life of this dissertation.
Could ya fix that link please…………..
the hell with the link..I turned to other link and found One very Hot Chick! post more pics, please and cut the sociology nonsense.
A very interesting article and I would agree that it is nice to see someone getting attention for their scholarship. But in a way, the conclusions of her study don’t really strike me as that “new” or “shocking.” I recall seeing a piece on one of these TV magazine news shows like NBC’s “Dateline” or ABC’s “20/20” several years ago where two groups of young men with identical references and resumes went about to get an apartment, a job, etc. One group was white and one group was African-American. The results turned out pretty much the same as this study.
Agreed that it’s not that surprising, but since so many people wish to deny this aspect of social reality, it’s very good to have solid research to point to (in addition to honing our understanding of racial phenomenon such as this).
Eszter/Kieran/other sociologists, do you understand Heckman’s objection? In the article, it seems rather incoherent, except the sample size complaint.
I’m going to claim a small measure of credit for this, in my capacity as the plankton in this media food chain. Brad DeLong saw the post that I wrote about Devah’s dissertation and blogged about it himself, which in turn was was read by David Wessel who wrote a column for the Wall Street Journal about the research. From there it was on to Howard Dean’s stump speech and now the Times. Of course, Devah’s research has intrinsic value and immediacy that it was only a matter of time before it bubbled up to media prominence by itself.
Steven says:
the conclusions of her study don’t really strike me as that “new” or “shocking.”
That’s not the point. It’s one thing to do a quick comparison on a TV show with one or two people and another to do a properly controlled, well-designed audit study that allows you to pin down the effect. Excellence in social science isn’t always about coming up with something no-one’s ever thought of before. You need to get the nuts and bolts right because the belief that the labor market itself is basically unbiased with respect to irrelevant characteristics like race or gender is phenomenally strong amongst many people. (Ascriptive characteristics are thought to really boil down to differences in innate ability, human capital or preferences.) Which brings us to
Heckman’s objection? In the article, it seems rather incoherent, except the sample size complaint.
Heckman complains that it’s an audit study rather than an experiment. Devah sent out matched pairs of resumes to employers to see what they would do. But this isn’t quite the same as a classic controlled double-blind study, which would be extremely difficult to do in this case, particularly with anything resembling a large sample. Heckman is basically saying that while this is a really well-executed study on labor market discrimination, his a priori belief in unbiased and efficient labor markets is so strong that it would take something more — the second coming of Jesus Christ, perhaps — to convince him to change his mind.
But in a way, the conclusions of her study don’t really strike me as that “new” or “shocking.”
oppression is not an entertainment, and is generally sadly lacking in novelty or surprise value. it is worth remarking on until it is no longer true.
I’m going to claim a small measure of credit for this,
Start collecting props, connecting plots, Networking like a conference, because the nonsense has yet to stop… :-)
Thanks Kieran.
Kieran, this is interesting, since it reverses the conventional wisdom (to which I have contributed) that the ecological relationship of blog to old media is that of parasite or predator - blogs sitting at the top of the food chain, rather than, in this case at the bottom.
In relation to academic research, this relationship is still present (for example, my post on Cavanagh), but examples like yours are likely to predominate in future. The same will probably be true in lots of areas where there is a substantial group of bloggers with specialist knowledge.
Steven Krause wrote: But in a way, the conclusions of her study don’t really strike me as that “new” or “shocking.” I recall seeing a piece […]where two groups of young men with identical references and resumes went about to get an apartment, a job, etc. One group was white and one group was African-American.
It’s worth emphasizing that what’s new isn’t documenting race effects in job market discrimination. It’s documenting that those effects are larger than the effects of a felony conviction.
This finding also, I should note, does serious damage to the ‘rational racism’ hypothesis, i.e. that whites are amateur racial-profilers who use race as a (reasonable approximation of a) proxy for other, genuinely undesirable, traits, especially a proclivity toward crime. It’s absurd to think that race is a better proxy for likelihood-to-commit-a-crime than is a felony conviction.
On the other hand, I wonder whether the results would have been any different using a felony other than coke possession— embezzlement, larceny, auto theft. I doubt it, but I wonder.
Kieran…
You should restrict yourself when you attribute claims or propositions to her research to only her own explicitly stated conclusions. The labor market samples are time-specific means across broad occupational categories and only lend themselves to heavily qualified and general indentifications of trends… which she’s careful to note.
Furthermore, without a great deal of secondary reading there’s no way to test those systemic models and conclusions of other scholars that are used as initial premises; their publication dates are far apart (some older than I am) and the geograpic spread irregular (for example, D., is the model from the UK really translatable?). And the code used to derive the intersection angles slopes should be included (diatonic shouldn’t be used on selected % of samples without showing the super-set as well).
Yeah, I’m nitpicking. I don’t have any serious objections, but would suggest the occupation piece led to some hasty generalizations from poltical hacks.
Kieran:
“But this isn’t quite the same as a classic controlled double-blind study, which would be extremely difficult to do in this case, particularly with anything resembling a large sample.”
I’d guess impossible, since that would mean that the subjects would have to be randomized to race, and left unaware of which race they were.
Of course, if Heckman has that level of objection, then perhaps he should leave his chosen field of economics, and go into one where the most common method is not running models on aggregated observational data.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review