Apparently, we are bombing the town of Fallujah. Apparently, we are doing this because the residents refuse to co-operate with our wishes by not “handing over” the notorious terrorist Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi. Apparently, we will continue to bomb them until they do so.
I am, as a result haunted by a nightmare in which I am flying in a helicopter gunship above the town of Fallujah, looking down on the wrecked buildings and bodies below. I find myself having a conversation, through a megaphone, with one of the residents:
Me: Just hand over Zarqawi and we’ll let you live!
Resident: OK! OK! We’re having a bit of trouble finding him!
Me: A likely story! Bomb them again, Lurch!
Resident: Could you just give us a hand? Like maybe tell us where in Fallujah he’s staying?
Me: I don’t know. But we have excellent intelligence that tells us that you’re harbouring him! Bomb that coffee shop, Lurch, it looks like an ammo dump!
Resident: Well, what does he look like?
Me: Everyone knows what Zarqawi looks like! You’re just playing for time! Bomb him again!
Resident: Well, how many legs does he have? Give us something to work with here!
And at that point I wake up, screaming.
It strikes me that if your level of information about someone is not sufficient to answer the question “how many legs does he have?”, it would be a good idea to not express any strong opinions on the subject of that person. It also strikes me that if we’re reforming the intelligence process, then we might profitably include a question about “number of legs” on any checklist we propose to use to sift good intelligence from bad.
Me: A likely story! Bomb them again, Lurch!
Obviously a dream — you couldn’t afford to pay Lurch as well as John, even if you are an international financier.
No, this is actually Jim-Bob, who joined up to the army because it seemed to be the only way to get decent healthcare benefits. I just call him Lurch as an affectionate nickname.
Less than three.
See? Now Carlos just opened up the avenue for a dirty joke. If we had better intelligence such impure thoughts wouldn’t occur.
rob,
Well now I’m for cutting intelligence if it means higher quality jokes. And stories about three legged men certainly qualify as high quality jokes.
But to focus on the question of does the guy have a false leg or not and by merit of that question, disqualifying any other intelligence, seems extremely contrived. I suppose if the US was unsure of how many testicles he had, or toes, or maybe if he had a fake left ear, that would also qualify as a disaster of intelligence?
On the other hand, one of Zarqawi’s lackey’s was sent to work out the realities of metaphysics with Allah today. So maybe the intelligence people don’t consider three legged men all that funny.
Whoa, hold on. That Google groups search doesn’t point to any articles which say what you say they say.
I agree that if your statement is accurate, the US’s behavior in this instance is more despicable than it has generally been in the prosecution of this war. But is it?
This Times article is a better link. See also this
The public is not yet ready for a one-legged interpretation of this historic role.
What if al-Zarqawi is something like the dread pirate Roberts, a terrorist franchise rather than a vicious figurehead? Landing such a miscreant becomes rather more difficult, like teasing out the genealogy of a victory when success has a thousand fathers but failure is an orphan.
What if al-Zarqawi is something like the dread pirate Roberts, a terrorist franchise rather than a vicious figurehead?
That’s my gut sense. Very postmodern. Very Luther Blissett.
What if al-Zarqawi is something like the dread pirate Roberts, a terrorist franchise rather than a vicious figurehead?
Also like Ned Ludd, Captain Swing, Nicolai Bourbaki and Arthur Besse.
Date of birth: October 30, 1966
Place of birth: Zarqa, Jordan
Height: Unknown
Weight: Unknown
Hair: Dark
Eyes: Dark
Sex: Male
Complexion: Olive
Number of legs: Unknown
Apparently he looks like this, but inexplicably they don’t give a leg shot.
christ, I think he works in my tobacconists!
You are a god to me, Daniel.
Don’t you think your argument is rather dishonest? The stated rationale for the bombing is that Fallujah has been a staging ground for insurgent attacks elsewhere. You focus on one speech by Allawi, where he offers to cease the attacks if the residents turn over Zarqawi, and pretend it accurately represents the U.S. motivation in this case. But the US has stated its intentions here - to rid the insurgency of a base to launch further attacks.
Don’t you think your argument is rather dishonest? The stated rationale for the bombing is that Fallujah has been a staging ground for insurgent attacks elsewhere. You focus on one speech by Allawi, where he offers to cease the attacks if the residents turn over Zarqawi, and pretend it accurately represents the U.S. motivation in this case. But the US has stated its intentions here - to rid the insurgency of a base to launch further attacks.
Fallujah is now the symbol of resistance, so they think they have to destroy it to make the point that resistance is futile. And they will. Simple as that.
A series of policy mistakes by the U.S. military and the Bush administration have transformed Fallujah from a shabby, dusty backwater known regionally for mosques and tasty kebabs into a symbol of Arab pride and defiance of the United States throughout the Islamic world.
Could this be a reason to bomb them every day; y’know - to subtly make the point that resistance is futile?
Nah, what a ridiculous idea: clearly it’s the one-legged guy they want. They’ve gotta have’m.
The NYT had an article on October 12 about how the Pentagon saw civilian casualties as useful in driving a wedge between the residents of Fallujah and the insurgents. Jeanne at Body and Soul wrote a piece about this on that day, and cites the relevant quote.
This is probably an opportune time to cite another quote, the one by Orwell about how nationalists never even hear about the atrocities committed by the home team.
You focus on one speech by Allawi, where he offers to cease the attacks if the residents turn over Zarqawi, and pretend it accurately represents the U.S. motivation in this case.
Even if it was only Allawi saying that, wouldn’t it tell us something rather unpleasant about the man the US picked for the job, and hence the US’s own goals?
However, you can’t have it both ways. Either:
(a) (contrary to all the avilable evidence) Allawi is in control and he was in a position to make such a demand,
or (b) Allawi is not in control; the demand was calculated nonsense because he was in no position to make such a guarantee (and he if he was, it would be only on US say-so); and furthermore, he is an American pupp.. cough - sorry, I should use the more “polite” formulation: “subordinate to the Americans”. Clearly, the latter is the case.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review