One of the most common complaints about blogs is that we’re essentially parasites; without the mainstream media, we’d be talking about our pets. I generally agree.
But every once in a while, bloggers get to a story first. Just yesterday, for example, Andrew Sullivan revealed the surprising news that Howard Dean, presidential candidate and governor of Vermont, is fluent in Haitian creole.
To be fair, I’m reading between the lines a little. I have to assume that Howard Dean speaks Haitian creole. Because if he doesn’t, Andrew’s criticism of a song in Creole doesn’t make the slightest bit of sense. (I notice that respected economics professor Tyler Cowen loves Don Giovanni. To the Babelfish! Get ‘im!)
Jeez. Sullivan is not a stupid man, and I feel certain that he didn’t go to the Kennedy School of Government with the dream of dumbing down political discourse. And yet, here we are. As a wise man once said, “What a waste it is to lose one’s mind.”
Jack O’Toole has more.
UPDATE: Another scoop! The Bush administration and congressional investigators say that they don’t have sufficient evidence to connect Saddam Hussein to the 9/11 attacks, but Andrew has found the proof.
(That’s enough Andrew - Ed)
Therein lies the key weakness of (solo) blogging: When you have no editor, no need to actually have some print organ publish, no accountability (and no, blogs of left and right persuasion sniping at each other doesn’t really count), then quality suffers since you can just churn out whatever comes to mind without really being called on it. With no corrective mechanisms, that which is shrill becomes even moreso and next thing you know, you’ve been taken by the Brain Eater.
Yeah, I like Sully, and read him regularly, but that particular post was just silly.
Which, I suppose, might be how he meant it.
Interesting. There are 18 digits in the URL for that link. So Sullivan has posted, what, a trillion trillion times? Busy guy.
I think blogs are turning into a really great fact-checking mechanism, at least the portion of the blogging world that Crooked Timber, Volokh, Mark Kleiman, Dan Drezner, Brad DeLong et al. inhabit. These are all tremendously smart people, all of whom do a really good job pointing out the fallacies in mainstream media — of which there are many.
Mainstream media might still be good for actual initial-fact demonstration (event E happened in place P at time T), but they’re terrible for news analysis. I find myself skipping the commentary part of most news articles nowadays (the “what does this event MEAN” portion), and only reading the factual part. And for many of the factual parts, I now find that I don’t even need to read what a reporter writes — I can go on the net and find the actual text of Bush’s speech, and I don’t need to know what the reporter thinks is significant about that speech; I’ll make up my own mind about that, thank you very much.
I doubt that mainstream media are all that reliable. Whom do you trust more on drug policy: some journalism-school graduate with no scientific training, or Mark Kleiman? When discussing law, whom do you trust more: a non-lawyer, or Eugene Volokh? (If you think Volokh too partisan, try any number of other law professors with blogs. Jack Balkin, say.)
The mainstream media are slowly losing sectors in which they dominate. These days, I’m much more likely to check the New York Times headline, see that Bush delivered a speech, find the text of the speech, form my own opinions, then check various learned folks to see what they thought about it. The Times becomes a pointer to actual interesting content, rather than the provider of that content — kind of like how I’ll get recommendations from Amazon, then go to the Harvard Book Store to actually buy the book.
All right, that was my long ramble. I hope it went somewhere interesting.
Gosh, yeah, why can’t the Democrats see how it’s all connected? Huh? Why? All it takes is some Marines to spell it out for them, so why are they so like clueless?
I didn’t realize Andrew Sullivan was such a PC prude. But then again, that does seem to be the norm among the Republican standard-bearers these days, doesn’t it?
I just read through the lyrics while listening to the song again (it’s one of my favorite songs, but I couldn’t pick up most of the lyrics, only knowing French), and I think that even for Sullivan it’s spectacular how much he doesn’t get the song at all.
To me, the message sent by the song is similar to the message being sent by MEChA — be proud of your culture, don’t respond to pressure to cast it off in favor of your adopted country (pressure, as we see here, from people like Sullivan). There’s clearly nothing against non-Haitians in the song, and thus nothing against assimilation. Wyclef makes this point quite clearly: “You’re scared to say Haitian girls are beautiful / Beautiful girls are beautiful.” The tendency of repressed ethnic groups in America to be sexually attracted only to women of the dominant ethnic group has been documented by Alex Haley, among others. Is there anything “anti-assimilation” about criticizing that? If Andrew continues arguing this point, then he is basically defining “assimilation” as submission to the dominant race. I don’t think this is actually what he believes, though.
The thing is, I don’t think Andrew is necessarily misinterpreting this song. It seems with all the pointed references to Israel, the lyrics should be striking a familiar chord with him. (I somehow doubt he objects to Israeli identity politics.) I think that, as with those in an uproar over MEChA, he is threatened by immigrants and the contributions they might make to the American melting pot. This is an especially unfortunate example of present-day conservative ideology actively working against what has long been regarded an American point of pride.
Hey give me a break. I only had a few minutes to think of a way of smearing Dean.
And by the way, renowned constitutional scholar Ann Coulter agrees with me about 9-11:
“On the basis of their recent pronouncements, the position of the Democratic Party seems to be that Saddam Hussein did not hit us on 9-11, but Halliburton did.”
http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2003/091003e.htm
So there!
Why do people keep saying Sully is smart, if he keeps saying stupid things? The stupidest, to my mind, was the religion bit in the NYT magazine after September 11. The fact that everyone bit on that idiocy reflects on everyone.
Of course there is a link between 9/11 & Iraq: the fighters that could had intercepted the attack were all over in Iraq.
Steve is right. Mainstream analysis sucks. There is a little bit that’s good. A tiny bit. People accuse the blogosphere of being an “echo chamber”. Well what does that make the mainstream media? A whole bunch of screaming inside one big ugly head?
It comes from the Rittenhouse Review, that is to the left, but it puts it succinctly. The blogosphere gives you a whole bunch of truly independent views, for the most part done with a degree of intelligence that is completely missed by anybody who is creating for mass consumption.
I agree completly. I’ll read the speeches and the reports myself, thank you very much. The mainstream media DOES have a place. It’s to tell us what where and when. Not how and why anymore.
The best part was his first post about the Wyclef song. Without knowing what language the song was in, Sully quoted the line “yo pa respekte Israel”, then basically accused Dean of hating Jews. It’s a reggae song. Of course it’s pro-Israel. When he posted the translation of the song, he did not mention how it completely contradicted his earlier take, or apologized for smearing Dean.
Great self-correcting mechanism my ass.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review