I was looking over the forms I’ll have to fill in to get my latest US Visa, and I was struck by this question on the DS-157 form.
Do You Have Any Specialized Skills or Training, Including Firearms, Explosives, Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical Experience?
Since I’m applying for a specialist skill visa, you’d kinda think I should answer “Yes” just reading the first part of the question. But I think the words after “Including” rather change the meaning of it all. At least I think I think they do. I hope I can’t get brought up on perjury charges for trying to hide my extensive philosophical skills from consular officials.
I am chemically experienced.
Seems like a question with very broad scope.
It’d technically include adult men coming from all countries that still have compulsory military service. So that’d include all of my male in-laws and in my own immediate family (British - so no national service now) it’d include just about every adult man apart from me! [less of the black sheep and more of the effete intellectual sheep of the family…]
I presume the question is supposed to catch Al-Qaeda weapons technicians and the like. These questions always seem designed to protect the immigration service from liability rather than to actually detect anyone - since clearly you’d just lie. Ditto for all those “do you intend to overthrow the government of [insert country] by violent means?” questions…
I am always puzzled when academics point out poor writing by (I’m willing to bet) a college graduate: doesn’t that mean you and your colleagues aren’t doing your jobs?
Had great fun answering questions on my Visa application. “Have you ever committed espionage?”
Fortunately it turns out that the legal definition of ‘espionage’ they use is against the US. So spying against commies does not count.
Also they didn’t have the specialist skill question on my form which was rather helpful given that I have a degree in nuclear physics and have held an explosives manufacturing license.
Just remember, the point of such questions isn’t to get you to tell the truth, but to allow for you to be thrown in a dark hole w/o councel for ages on end if it ever seems convenient for an “immigration violation”. Also, all resident aliens, please don’t forget to update DHS/USCIS when you move, since not doing so is also something to get thrown in the hole for.
I am always puzzled when academics point out poor writing by (I’m willing to bet) a college graduate: doesn’t that mean you and your colleagues aren’t doing your jobs?
No, it means high-school teachers aren’t doing their jobs.
WSM: your comment is bizarre. Surely you are aware that documents like this are not written by one person, but filtered through a trillion commitees and executives, all full of people who might have gone to college many years ago but whose only CURRENT priority is to cover their asses, and to hell with it if the language in question ends up being ambiguous to the point of nonsense.
The post in general: This kind of question makes me really, really mad. There are a few on every visa application I’ve ever seen, and there’s never a way to clarify what they mean (the closest you can get is a dubious “well, gee, I guess” ruling from some guy who has no real knowledge, no authority and who’ll forget all about your question in an hour). They are, as Matt says, basically traps.
And do you know why governments write their visa forms this way? Because they can. Because the threat of not being permitted to enter the country is the ultimate stick. If you want to enter the country, you’ll just have to eat the shit they give you at the front door. It makes me furious. Why set up this hostile, confrontational relationship with every single person who asks to come inside?
It reminds me a real story about a logician who failed the citizenship exam on the following question: “Do you believe in American Constitution?”
Rather than answering in affirmative or negative, he tried to make sure that he understood the question correctly: “Do you want to know if I believe that American Constitution exists?” which displeased the examiner.
However, upon reading the question very slowly, it seems to me that you were asked if you have “specialized” “skill or training” that include “firearms, …., or chemical” experience. To answer, ponder this: can a skill include an experience? I would say that a skill may result from experience, but it does not include it, so I would answer in the negative.
Nothing to do with specialist skills, but here’s an uncomfortable fact about a UK visa:
The nearest UK equivalent to the US Green Card is known as Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). This is the visa you need for regular residency in the UK, and the next step up is naturalisation. (NB: I have no idea how the process works for those who came over with work visas; this description concerns those who come over on a spousal visa.) There is no long-term alternative to the ILR; once you’ve got over the early hurdle (eg a spousal visa), the ILR is all there is (sans naturalisation).
A quirk about the ILR: technically it expires any time you leave the country, and it’s up to the immigration officer you see upon your return to decide whether or not to “renew” it. So getting back in the country, even if you’ve been living here for years, isn’t guaranteed. Which means that when it’s 7am and an immigration official hasn’t had his second cup of tea yet and is feeling particularly petulant and wants to be a bit of a bully, the only thing to do is to put one’s tail between one’s legs and be a Very Good Boy Indeed until it’s over.
Not the worst fate in the world, and I can understand the need for safety precautions, but it’s amazing how much fear re-entry can cause. After all, when one’s life and all that that entails is now in the UK, and one surly immigration official has the power to end that in the blink of an eye, and you know you don’t have the funds for a long legal battle… well, it’s not the most pleasant of situations.
On the other hand, my experiences with British immigration officials have generally been quite positive (American “quite”, not British). Anecdotally at least, American immigration officials are far more prone to use their power to be jerks.
Extensive philosophy skills could get you some time in naked people pyramids - either at Gitmo or at the annual staff party.
Also, all resident aliens, please don’t forget to update DHS/USCIS when you move, since not doing so is also something to get thrown in the hole for.
Also applies to non-residents (ie, H1-Bs like me).
I can’t find the article now, but I read something the other day that quoted the amount of these change of address forms that have been lost. It was a horrifyingly high number.
I also wonder how long it takes them to get from receiveing it to processing it/typing it in your file. And if your screwed if you travel in the interim.
At least if they sent a little “we got it!” receipt we’d know with confiidence when stepping through immigration next time around.
BfromB:
From an op-ed in the El Paso Times:
INS has a track record of losing and misplacing documents filed by immigrants. Recently, INS found more than 2 million missing documents in a Missouri warehouse, including 200,000 change-of-address forms. With INS’ record, it is likely that immigrants who comply will be wrongfully punished.”
That would be 200,000 forms that we know about, although I’m having trouble verifying this story through an independent news search (the relevant searches tend to turn up a lot of sites about how to get your green card).
BTW: If you’re a non-citizen and you’re unsure about your immigration status, or maybe even if you aren’t, do not take any photographs that may include federal offices or bridges.
Hmm, “philosophical skills”…
Clearly unAmerican.
Yes, the dearth of good philosophy done in American philosophy departments is staggering, isn’t it? It’s really a wasteland. Hardly anyone of note teaches in the US any more.
Philosophy has probably killed more people over the centuries than firearms, anyway . . .
;)
The Visa Waiver Form I-94W (which you fill in while on the plane to the US) contains the following clear hint on how to answer the questions:
Important: If you answered “Yes” to any of the above, please contact the American Embassy BEFORE you travel to the U.S. since you may be refused admission into the United States.
So either invent timetravel and go back or just never answer yes.
Besides if you don’t know what “moral turpitude” is you already have violated the terms of your visa waiver: I certify that i have read and understand all the questions and statements on this form.
I think I’m not the only foriner that doesn’t know which crimes involve “moral turpitude”.
Reuben - anecdotally, my worst immigration experience to date is with a British officer at Heathrow in ‘94. He beat out the East Germans who invited me into a small room to discuss the contents of my wallet (but who turned out to have a sense of humor in the end) and the Belarusians who were clearly angling for a bribe but couldn’t be bothered to be really unpleasant and picked on the Russian-speaking Cuban in my compartment instead. The representative of HM Government clearly thought that I had come to sponge off the welfare system, since I didn’t have an onward ticket (London is the discount travel capital of the world, hello, I should be buying my transatlantic ticket in Helsinki instead??) and planned to visit dodgy people like Aussies and Kiwis.
I kept a civil tongue in my head and was allowed to sample the glories of London, which at that point included a complete lack of lodging because there was a train strike and everybody was staying put. As I was headed to the tube, an announcement came on saying that there was a fire in the terminal and no one was to move at all. “Is this normal?” I asked the Indian fellow who had been helping me find a place. “Oh yes, happens all the time.”
I’m told the UK does get better than that.
Reuben - anecdotally, my worst immigration experience to date is with a British officer at Heathrow in ‘94. He beat out the East Germans who invited me into a small room to discuss the contents of my wallet (but who turned out to have a sense of humor in the end) and the Belarusians who were clearly angling for a bribe but couldn’t be bothered to be really unpleasant and picked on the Russian-speaking Cuban in my compartment instead. The representative of HM Government clearly thought that I had come to sponge off the welfare system, since I didn’t have an onward ticket (London is the discount travel capital of the world, hello, I should be buying my transatlantic ticket in Helsinki instead??) and planned to visit dodgy people like Aussies and Kiwis.
I kept a civil tongue in my head and was allowed to sample the glories of London, which at that point included a complete lack of lodging because there was a train strike and everybody was staying put. As I was headed to the tube, an announcement came on saying that there was a fire in the terminal and no one was to move at all. “Is this normal?” I asked the Indian fellow who had been helping me find a place. “Oh yes, happens all the time.”
I’m told the UK does get better than that.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review