There were the personal tragedies of 9/11 for the family and friends of those who died.. and then followed all the other tragedies. Michael Froomkin links to this disturbing film.
oh this is really stretching it - I mean before 9/11 the world was at peace.
Sure, human rights abuses like Rodney King occured but they were just rational anticipations of the forthcoming forces of darkness.
And yes - the suffering of those poor people is qualitatively and quantiatatlively beyond anything anyone, 9/11 victoms included, has ever suffered or will ever suffer.
nonsense on stilts.
The only stretch here seems to be your interpretation of the post, giles.
You know, flicking through the biographies on that site, it’s astonishing that some of them were arrested and spent months in jail because someone said they were “suspicious” or (in one case, literally) “un-american”. How disgusting.
I’d actually be very interested in a thorough, serious, fair-minded study of the people arrested after 9/11, the justifications (or lack thereof) for their arrest, and the consequences they suffered as a result. This film is rather obviously not such a study. In fact, the effect of its Web preview—on me, at least—is the exact opposite of its obviously intended one: rather than evoke my sympathy, it arouses my suspicion, because the obvious gaping holes in all of the stories it tells suggest that the missing details were omitted because they interfere with the film’s propaganda goals.
A more balanced documentary might well have convinced me that the overall behavior of US law enforcement authorities in the wake of 9/11 was deeply faulty, and needs to be reformed. This film, however, is unlikely to convince me of anything but the filmmakers’ preference for emotional manipulation over informative communication.
Dan: are you saying the film makes things up? that the story of the guy getting pulled up - where you from, Israel, Jewish or Arab, what’s the difference, it’s a big difference, I’m Arab, you’re arrested - is a lie?
I’m just asking, I wasn’t there either when that guy got pulled up, so I can’t know, either. But there’s not many ways you can “emotionally manipulate” or “propagandise” a story like that, if it’s true. It’s told rather dryly, too. If it’s not true, then, it’s not a documentary, but fiction, and its makers are not propagandists, but frauds. If, taking skepticism further, there are no true stories like that, then, any reports of cases of people detained without charges and then released, are also lies, and the journalists reporting about them are all lying scum.
OR, it’s perfectly normal to detain people without charges, considering.
Or, again, we might just cut it shorter and just say, who cares, they’re all Muslims anyway. They must have done something wrong. Their legal troubles are nothing, nothing compared to what the families of victims of terrorist attacks suffered. They should be thankful they’re not in some Arab dictatorship. It’s a testament to the restraint of Americans that Muslim/Arab Americans didn’t get beaten up after 9/11. Etc. etc. (Just some of the responses I’ve heard to the mention of the situation of people detained like that).
No one likes to hear stories like that.
I think it’s hard to argue that there were no abuses of government power against Muslim immigrants following 9/11. It’s worth noting, though, that many of the cased cited on the film’s website ended in deportation or some other sanction, which suggests that the people at issue in those particular cases were found to have been in violation of immigration law. It strikes me that these cases are examples where the system worked, not where it failed. Presumably the filmmakers had the opportunity to select the most sympathetic group of cases for their film, and the fact that they have lumped in these violators with cases that do sound as though they may have been abusive suggests that the abuses may not have been as widespread as the filmmakers seem to suggest.
Tom T—I haven’t watched the trailer, but the fact that a person is eventually deported does not necessarily mean that the system worked. Take this rather notorious and despicable case—a harmless Nepalese illegal immigrant was left to rot in a cell where the lights never went off, for three months, because he’d been videotaping on the streets of New York.
Perhaps the filmmakers exaggerate how widespread the problems are, but the government has been so insistent on secrecy that it’d be hard to tell. Does anyone have any governmental figures on post-9/11 arrests, confinements, etc.?
Deportation after arrests with no charges and long periods of detainment is proof of what system working? this isn’t about immigration.
It is disturbing that violations of legal principles and human rights should be dismissed so carelessly, but oh well we’ve had careless dismissals and apologies of far worse, so I guess I shouldn’t be so surprised.
Matt: no, of course there are no governmental figures, they were even trying to deny they were hiding prisoners from the Red Cross, then they had to admit that, and there have also been suspicions of other undisclosed detention ‘facilities’ like Guantanamo. There have been many people detained with no charges and no trials, also in the UK to a lesser extent. There have been several reports on this issue in the past years so it sure isn’t being raised for the first time by this documentary.
Mona—I’m referring to the legal defense-style selective presentation of the cases. In some cases, the subject’s completely wholesome, non-activist, lifestyle, free of any terrorist associations, is earnestly recounted—and in other cases, the description is strangely silent on the subject. Some cases specify a ridiculously flimsy reason for the subject’s arrest, while others neglect to say anything—even whether the reason for the arrest is publicly known. Some cases trumpet the subject’s eventual exoneration, while others are much more vague—referring to deportation, for example, without elaborating on the reason for the deportation. In each case, therefore, one wonders what an objective journalist would have included that this filmmaker/advocate left out.
Matt—it sounds perfectly plausible to me that the government has been less than perfectly forthcoming about the details of the disposition of the post-9/11 detainees. All the more reason, then, for an objective, dispassionate accounting of the cases, so that consensus can be reached as to what excesses, if any, have been perpetrated, and how to avoid them in the future.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review