We’ve had more than a few things to say about the Iowa Electronic Markets over the life of Crooked Timber. In particular, John and myself have defended the view that these markets do not appear to offer marginal information above and beyond published opinion polls.
Some would say that this is fighting talk, and that if we really thought this, we ought to be trying to make some money out of it. So here goes …
Big thanks to Nasi Lemak for sharing a dataset of historical poll data with me. I have used that data to construct and backtest a trading system for the IEM Kerry vote-share contract (KERR) which uses only published poll data and generates favourable backtesting over the last four months. The equity curve for this system so far is below the fold; I plan to use it to trade the IEM vote-share market over the rest of the campaign.
I’m not giving away any details of the system just yet; I’ll reveal them all at the end of the experiment. When the winner-takes-all market is launched, it is quite likely that I will bring another system into play based on trading the WTA contracts as if they were derivatives on the VS market, however that will not affect the current system which is entirely based on publicly available poll data. If I refine the system (currently it only makes use of Bush’s “Approval” ratings, whereas going forward I’d like to drive it off the approval/disapproval spread. I’d also like it to be able to double up and reduce bet size; currently it’s a pretty crude on/off switch), I’ll keep a record of what I did and when. But the proof of the pudding will be in my final P&L; I think that the IEM follows polls rather than leading them, and this is my way of finding out if I’m right. I’ll update as and when the system suggests I trade.
As of today, as the chart above shows, the system is long KERR, which I bought this morning at $0.495. I’ve entered into this trend fairly late, so I’m more or less expecting a few drawdowns early in trading, but if the system works, it ought to be well in profit by November. Wish me luck …
NB: I really am setting myself up for a fall on this one, by the way. If you look at the second bar on the chart above, it’s driving nearly half of the entire backtesting performance, and it’s just by pure fluke that the system happened to switch over on the precise peak of one of the bigger volatility spikes during the period in which the KERR contract was settling down post-Iowa. I obviously can’t count on this happening in the future, so I’m just going to hope I can rely on 1) the KERR contract having persistent trends, 2) these trends running roughly in line with the poll data and 3) me being quick enough on the trading button to avoid getting my face ripped off by intraday movements and the bid-ask spread. My guess is that 3) is the biggest risk.
I assumed you wanted the spreadsheet to make some recondite (yet wittily put) point about the fallibility of large populations, not to make your fortune!
heh. I’ll cut you in on a share of the profits if there are any … so far there haven’t been any moves at all.
Dsquared,
Without giving the details away can you explain what the chart shows? I thought it meant you took positions when the two lines cross, but the most recent one clearly isn’t.
Kudos to you, win or lose. This is the best way to convince the market-mad people (myself included).
Dsquared,
Do you have an argument that defeats the people who, disagreeing with the results of your study, simply will say “How unlucky/lucky of Dsquared.”?
For example:
“NB: I really am setting myself up for a fall on this one, by the way.”
So you’ve preemptively explained away any negative result.
Also, I don’t see how this addresses the specific issues with the IEM: small amounts of money bet, relatively large start-up costs for bettors, small number of bettors, etc. So your conclusions may be specific to the IEM as it exists now, and may not help you argue about other markets.
For example, are the following reasonable?
- Small potential profits mean that people will not spend much time and effort making their bets; prices could well be determined by people betting “for fun”.
- This causes the market to be quite slow in incorporating new polling information.
- This allows you to make small amounts of money, not worth your time and effort.
- If just a few other people were doing what you are doing (or even similar things), then you couldn’t make money.
Matthew: the positions are shown by the bars; a bar pointing up from the RHS zero axis means that I’m long KERR, a bar pointing down means I’m short.
Bill: well yes, it’s all a bit of fun really. I put the caveats in a comment rather than the main story specifically to avoid making it look like I was trying to excuse failure of the system ahead of time.
All your points are well taken, but I think that any similar market would also have them. Unless we are seriously considering, as a society, diverting material proportions of our savings out of investment in productive assets and into rinkydink “predictive” exercises like this one, this objection is always going to be there.
Isn’t the point of the Iowa markets that they accurately reflect public opinion but far more cheaply?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review