Via Brayden King, I’ve come across a nice paper by Shin-Kap Han in the current issue of Social Networks, which my colleague Ron Breiger co-edits. The paper is a network analysis of the exchange of job candidates in a number of disciplines in the humanities and social sciences. Though academics talk about “the job market,” it will not surprise you that placement is deeply embedded in systems of departmental status that bear little resemblance to a properly functioning market. Indeed, the paper finds that the discipline that makes the study (and promotion) of markets its specialty is the one with the highest degree of elite solidarity and hierarchical control over the placement of its graduate students.
The paper confirms the intuition that there are self-reproducing departmental status systems within disciplines. Job candidates in all disciplines are exchanged in a well-defined manner between three classes of departments. Class I departments, at the top, exchange students amongst themselves and supply lower-tier departments with students but do not hire from them. Class II departments are on the “semi-periphery,” generally exchanging candidates with each other (though there is a hierarchical element to this) and also sending students to Class III departments, which never place students outside of their class and usually do not hire students from within their class.
This broad structure applies to all disciplines, though some draw sharper boundaries than others between Classes I and II. (In Sociology, for instance, the differentiation is particularly strong.) Within Class I departments, there’s a good deal of variation across disciplines in the degree of factionalization within the elite departments and the solidarity of the exchange system, as measured by within-class exchanges of students. Economics has the most cohesive elite faction and its “dominance over the entire discipline is overwhelming.” Class I Psychology departments, by contrast, are considerably more decentralized, with three contending factions. Different measures bring out different aspects of the structure. Economics scores highest on all exchange-based measures of hierarchy and solidarity.
There’s an old article by Arthur Stinchcombe called “A Structural Analysis of Sociology” which, only half-jokingly, treats the exchange of job candidates in sociology from the perspective of Levi-Strauss’s structural anthropology: departments are tribes, graduate students are women to be married off, and areas of specialization are clan-markers that help define which exchanges are appropriate and which are taboo. Han’s paper does a nice job of quantifying the structure of exchange in graduate students and demonstrating how it varies across disciplines. It wouldn’t do prospective graduate students any harm to have a clear picture of this social structure in mind — together with a grasp of their own potential place in it as a unit of exchange — before applying to grad school.
is this the reason why studying something obscure and thereby creating a monopoly doesn’t work? ;)
Besides, it seems to prove that academia is inherently hostile to the free market, so no wonder there’s all those liberals in there.
Economics scores highest on all exchange-based measures of hierarchy and solidarity.
Let the rationalisations begin …
Well, our students go out early—way too early—before they’ve finished even one article. They’re bright young things sold on the basis of potential.
We at Berkeley do keep saying that there is a clear market failure on the used junior market, and that we ought to try to pick off people two or three years out who are “underplaced” and hire them…
It makes sense that a discipline more concerned with form than intellectual substance relies on arbitrary markers of quality to make personnel decisions. When the theories of both Smith’s student and Miller’s student have the same number of true ‘aha’ moments in them (0), how can you tell them apart other than to note that Smith’s program is ranked higher than Miller’s?
We at Berkeley do keep saying that there is a clear market failure on the used junior market, and that we ought to try to pick off people two or three years out who are “underplaced” and hire them…
I keep sayin’ that “sayin’ ain’t doin’” but I never seems to do anythin’ about it!
I wonder what impact an analysis of non-humanities disciplines would have on this hypothesis. At issue is whether the humanities have bench-marks that allow them to behave as a functional market. As Dr. Castronova points out, how should one measure schools of thought which both have no ‘aha moments’?
Relatedly, do applied disciplines where ‘sucess’ can be measured at least in some forms independent from the system (i.e. schooling, theoretical background, what’s ‘hot’) that produced them —function more like efficient systems?
Furthermore, does this relate to the wide-spread downsizing of the humanities across academia in favor of more “success-orientated” (read: money-making) disciplines?
I wonder what impact an analysis of non-humanities disciplines would have on this hypothesis. At issue is whether the humanities have bench-marks that allow them to behave as a functional market.
It would be nice to think that somehow markets and scientific truth would be positively correlated, but I doubt it. The structure of careers in many sciences is even more hierarchically organized than the humanities and social sciences — the Postdoc “journeyman” stage is fully institutionalized, getting established is about builing a lab in a position to attract grants and so on.
The structure of careers in many sciences is even more hierarchically organized than the humanities and social sciences the Postdoc journeyman stage is fully institutionalized, getting established is about builing a lab in a position to attract grants and so on.
Yes I know it too well (being a post-doc myself). I might have read things wrong, but I was under the impression that the issue was how certain programs can be analysed from a ‘tribal’ (i.e. Class I vs. Class II) perspective. There just seem to be more ways of bucking the ‘class’ system in other disciplines (such as grants, publishing etc). You can get hired at Harvard and Stanford even if you come from a Class III school. Whereas in other (more theoretical? ) disciplines, if you did not graduate from an Ivy league school, you will not be hired by one. This of course is a wide generalization, but I wonder if the general point holds true. Anyhow, interesting article
BTW if you work for an institution that has a subscription to Elsevier journals, but don’t have Social Networks lying around your office, you can get the full PDF of Han’s paper from here:
For those of you without an institutional affiliation, Han has a link for the paper on his website.
http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~skh/TR.pdf
It’s an intriguing paper, to which I really ought to devote more reading time than my early skimming.
It should be said that this kind of structure was at least acknowledged by one of my tutors, who advised me, as an Oxford DPhil in English heading out to the US, to seek gainful employ with a ‘good second-division university’, based on the premise that the Ivy League tends to recruit talent from its own and its peers, work it into the ground without any hope of tenure, and turn bright-eyed academic hopefuls into bitter husks. By contrast, a junior position in the ‘semi-periphery’ is considered a better place from which to launch one’s academic career, with less of a rat-race and more space in which to expand.
That’s why I’m a little surprised by the ‘self-loop’ described in the paper, but it might be the case that there are better reasons for Class I graduates to head to Class I institutions.
I’m particularly intrigued by the ‘inbreeding’ and ‘outbreeding’ of academic staff: the notion that while ‘feeder’ institutions don’t like to hire their own for junior positions, they’ll gladly send them out for ‘seasoning’ and bring them back when tenure’s at stake. That’s less the case at Oxford (an inbreeder if ever there was one) but I can see the logic behind it.
Oh, damn, left this comment too late. Well, Nick, you’re wrong, in a Crocodile Dundee sense: Oxford’s not an inbreeder (Honestly. Among junior research fellowships and so forth there are actually quite a lot of non-Oxford people.) Cambridge is an inbreeder.
I’ve never heard of anyone getting a JRFship there who didn’t already have a Cambridge connection, usually through being a graduate/undergraduate.
And I spent two years there before fleeing, so I did meet quite a lot of JRFs.
(I think there is some basic Oxford insecurity that means it wants to import good people from elsewhere to try to keep up, while that wonderful Cambridge insularity means they see no need to correspond with the rest of the world but merely wish to incubate the careers of their best and brightest.)
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review