People inclined to make sweeping judgments about the nature of the natural and social sciences based on a glancing acquaintance with the idea of falsification and a collection of popular books about quantum mechanics should read ‘Electron Band Structure in Germanium, My Ass’. (Via Electrolite.)
As someone who has never found an undergraduate laboratory course to be worthwhile, having taken several in materials, EE, and physics — this seems all too familiar.
You do, of course, realize this is a joke, right?
The data set is surely a joke, as you shouldn’t get more than a few percentage points of error in a solid state lab, even if you’re lazy and, say, don’t correct for input impendence, component tolerance, etc. But also a joke is turning in 25 pages of boilerplate each week. ;-)
CS? Computer Science? What, you’d rather be a waiter? Just fake it better, quit bitching and get a job as a prof at a community college. CS. Sheesh.
CS? Computer Science? What, you’d rather be a waiter? Just fake it better, quit bitching and get a job as a prof at a community college. CS. Sheesh.
You do, of course, realize this is a joke, right?
Gee I dunno, Maynard, it looked kinda serious to me. Don’t all revolutionary science papers end in the words, “My Ass”?
Assuming that I don’t actually choke on my own spit laughing at the graph, I may change to Physics from CS!
You do, of course, realize this is a joke, right?
Gee I dunno, Maynard, it looked kinda serious to me. Don’t all revolutionary science papers end in the words, “My Ass”?
Ha! At least one will when I publish my revolutionary “Vortex theory of time” paper. Archimedes Plutonium will weep at the depth of my insights.
I invite anyone who thinks that the social sciences and the physical sciences are of equal rigour to undertake the following trial:
1. Select some arbitrary number of passers-by and attempt by logical reasoning from well-founded premises to persuade them to adopt your political beliefs.
2. Observe whether the aforesaid passers-by are slowly drifting away from the surface of the Earth. I mean, they could, couldn’t they? Gravity is just a theory, after all. Sokal demonstrated that quite convincingly.
Kieran, thanks for the link to your old post on social science vs. science — a fine post in its day and it has aged well.
Let’s just say that that brings to mind certain classroom experiences of my own. (Such as the first time I tried to do the Millikan experiment and learned more about electric shocks than about the quantization of electric charge. Or the superconductivity exercise that mostly taught me never, never, never to work with liquid helium ever again. The Fourth Law of Thermodynamics is that working that close to absolute zero is a complete pain in the ass.)
“Let’s just say that that brings to mind certain classroom experiences of my own.”
Yep. I have several years running of independant data confirmations that disprove Rutherford’s atomic model. Nobody could get that piece of crap experiement to work. (Never a good sign when your grad TA looks at your data during your oral presentation and the first words out of his mouth are “something is terribly wrong here.”) Unfortunately I couldn’t find the actual prediction of the plum pudding model, because I bet it would have fit my data better than Rutherfords inverse cosine to the 4th. And it would have been fun to present that.
Oops—Rutherford’s model predicted an inverse sine to the 4th, not cosine. Not that any of you likely care any more than I do…
ROTFLMAO (for those who don’t know, that translates roughly as “laughing so hard I’m gaining abdominal definition from the exercise”).
At least this one is creative. Where I’m at, I’ve seen reports with much less content and much less discussion. The conclusion actually discusses something, anything, an impressive feat for an undergrad! (shades of SNL’s Celebrity Jeopardy sketches).
And try reading the rest of his website if you’ve got a few minutes. The bio is also rather amusing.
Alan, I don’t believe that ” the social sciences and the physical sciences are of equal rigour” but what has point 1 got to do with social science? — it sounds like an exercise in rhetoric to me. Point 2 doesn’t work either. No one disputes that people don’t float away, the question is, “why don’t they (when leaves, feathers, bubbles, etc sometimes do)?”
I invite anyone who thinks that the social sciences and the physical sciences are of equal rigour
Alan, whoever you’re arguing with here doesn’t seem to live in this thread.
I think Alan might be responding to the “sweeping judgments” link. His comments seem to be directly relevant to that post and discussion, and so aren’t inappropriate here.
His comment on moving to Computer Science may be better understood once the date of origin of the piece is determined. I first read it several years ago. Mailed it out, even.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review