Following on from last week’s case, which was concerned with the ontological argument, this week’s nutter in Laurie’s Inbox gives us the complete and comprehensive solution to consciousness and morality, two perennial favorites.
The Essay (Forward this to all!)Emphasis in the original, naturally. Onward:
[Name Redacted to Protect the Innocent]
This universe is filled with atoms, unified into clusters or systems. They make up all things of matter from rocks to humans. All things of matter are either unconscious (a.k.a dead/ non living), semi- conscious (partially conscious), or fully conscious. Intelligence is the ability to be conscious. If one conceives, then one also sees an amount of right and wrong. One always does what one truly conceives is right. When one does not conceive what is right, then one is blind and may do wrong. Right and wrong will always exist as long as life exists. …
The condition of being unconscious is having no consciousness of all the worlds components, including right and wrong, at any given point in time (not being aware of anything) … The condition of semi-consciousness is defined as not fully conceiving the world at any point in time. … The condition of being fully conscious is being conscious of everything in existence at any point in time, past, present, and future (a.k.a all knowing). … The more conscious one is, the more likely one would be to make righteous decisions. The less conscious one is, the more likely one would be to make wrongful decisions. The humans living on Earth, and all other living beings on Earth are not fully conscious. The following are not rules. They are statements that are facts (not mere philosophies) that my semi-conscious mind has conceived. …
You can’t make this stuff up. Apart from the semi-consciousness, I like the insistence on facts. Reminds me of the work of another philosopher: “I am Vroomfondel, and that is not a demand, that is a solid fact! What we demand is solid facts!”
Looks like somebody’s ripping off Gurdjieff/Ouspensky. There are some strange people into that stuff.
Scientology, maybe? “Clears” have perfect memory and judgement - might qualify as fully conscious under the correspondent’s rubric. Or maybe he’s high.
I’ve programmed drunk (for my private use, not professionally) with results not substantially inferior to my usual output. One of my best inventions sprang itself upon me in the course of one of the worst hangovers I’ve ever endured.
The clarity of one’s consciousness is generally less important than one’s understanding of the task at hand.
That being said, I’m not sure I understand the point of this post. It put me in mind of the old line, “I’ve been thrown out of better places than this!”
Well, my mind is notoriously bent way out of shape, but “semi-conscious” in that seems to be doing much the same work as “finite” in the existential tradition. (Although I am by no means claiming that you would treat Kierkegaard or Heidegger with more respect, perish the thought.)
And I, for one, demand rigidly-defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.
I’m not sure I understand the point of this post
Are you sure you should be reading blogs?
So, most everything is somewhat conscious, to some degree or other? Sounds like he’s been reading David Chalmers! Are you sure he’s not a U. Arizona Grad student?
My husband is a physicist and used to work at Lawrene Livemore Laboratory. They got the people who invented Whole New Theories of Physics. Not to mention Grand Unified Field Theories. I went with him to visit the guy who had figured out All About Magnetism! Really really scary, though probably harmless, dude.
MKK
Well, it is true that atoms “make up all things of matter from rocks to humans.” Hence, consecutively and consequentially, you can safely infer that you are made of atoms yourself and so is your fob pocket and the tail of your shirt and the instrument you use for taking the leavings out of the crook of your hollow tooth. Which explains why some people act like bicycles.
Looks like somebody’s ripping off Gurdjieff/Ouspensky.
No reason to give those guys credit for every spontaneous outbreak of emanational theology. Every couple years another group of the locals trips over an archetype, just like the hominids finding the black monolith in “2001” … this time it’s one of the gnostic monoliths. Nothing to see here. Move along.
Actually, if John Holbo is reading this, he should be interested to know that Neal Adams is convinced of a very similar idea. (It’s on his website. Look for the plate tectonics sections.)
I would think there is a spectrum of consciousness starting from a system with a mere reaction to an input (for example a transistor where the level of voltage on one end (the gate) determines the current flow from the source to the drain terminals) to a highly complex system (which is yet constrained by the physical laws) as our brain. There may even be a higher level of cousciousness.
To me consciousness is nothing but a cause-effect chain of events purely explainable by matter and physical laws. But then I expect these to be the views of most people here.
“To me consciousness is nothing but a cause-effect chain of events purely explainable by matter and physical laws. But then I expect these to be the views of most people here.”
it depends what kinds of inferences you make from physicalism (a substance monism). the way the “nothing but” claim is framed tends to cause some people to get entangled in weird ideas about determinism and the human will. (similar to but different from people like Kurt Vonnegut who are also a little bit crazy and solipsistic, but driven more by pessimism about human nature than “we’re meatbag robots” talk)
For example, in reference to Shai’s post, Donald Davidson argues from a (relatively) consistent physicalist perspective that mental events are identical with physical events, yet cannot be subsumed under physical descriptions. You can be a property dualist and a substance monist. Indeed, I tend to think that if you have the same Kantian motivations as Davidson, you’d better be exactly that.
The email however, looks to me like a religious nut (pace des).
No, no. People acting like bicycles happens because of the bouncing. It’s the atoms. After years of bumping over rough roads, the rider has exchanged so many atoms with his bicycle that he starts to take on its characteristics, and can be seen parking himself by leaning up against walls.
I know perfectly well that I shouldn’t be reading blogs, much less commenting upon them, but I thought there might be something more to this than holding one of an infinitude of fools up to ridicule.
“Hain’t we got all the fools in town on our side? And ain’t that a big enough majority in any town?”
Mark Twain, Huckleberry Finn, used as an introduction to The Fools in Town Are on Our Side by Ross Thomas, now perhaps the slogan of the Republican majority.
I’m not sure why there was such immediate aversion to the essay fragment that was posted. Getting past the potentially awkward tone of the author, just look at the ideas. Are you fully aware of EVERYTHING at this moment? No? Are you completely oblivious to EVERYTHING at this moment? No? Well then, you must be to some degree semi-aware. If you disagree with that or other ideas, well, let’s focus on them in particular and not simply throw up reactionary flags.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review