There are clearly some very smart folks behind Google given that they provide us with a great service and continually add useful features. That said, at times I am surprised by some of the decisions. Should they be placing their machine intelligence over user preferences? I am surfing the Web in Budapest. When I try to go to google.com, I am redirected to google.co.hu. I change the URL because I prefer to see the site in English. Fine. Then I run a search using English words and get Adwords Sponsored Links on the right in Hungarian. The rest of the interface is in English as are all of the results, but the ads are not. (Granted, the one term that matched the search term “domain” was in the ads, but every other word was in Hungarian.) Geography does not equal language preference or knowledge, especially when the user has already signaled so. It seems getting meaningful ads would be in the interest of both Google and its Adwords clients, why this decision then? (I commented on something very similar a year ago and although it seems some progress may have been made, need for improvement remains.)
Unless Google’s developers read this blog, it may stay that way, too. Hint, hint.
If you follow the “Language Tools” link that’s right next to the search form submit button, you’ll see a bunch of preferences you can set with respect to languages. If you follow the “Preferences” link, which leads to http://www.google.com/preferences, you’ll see that the functionality you desire is there. Unless I missed something …
Google makes a sensible business decision. Most U.S. advertisers have no interest in reaching an audience in Hungary, where the advertised products won’t be available. In general, web advertisers hate the idea that many of the eyeballs they reach are out of the physical range. On the other hand, Budapest advertisers do want to reach those Hungarians who web surf in English, since most of them also speak Hungarian and shop locally.
I agree with arthur. Geography does not equal language preference, but it indicates it, and advertising is not an exact science. This policy is probably the best they have found for delivering meaningful ads.
One thing I accidentally discovered while trying to stop the redirection to google.ca on which Google insists (at least for me,) I discovered that ww.google.com performs no redirection.
Actually, if you’re using an internet cafe or something, many users ahead of you have probably changed various settings both on the computer and in the google cookie indicating that they prefer things in Hungarian. Thus, your change on a few things may not have overrided all the other user selection pressure towards Hungarian. So they may be listening to the (inconsistent) user as best they can. Perhaps a setting for public computers would be better though.
Arthur, as I mentioned, my query included “domain”, which means it may have to do with domain registration (and that’s what the ads were for). Generic top level domain registration is precisely the type of service that is globally available no matter the registrar. (In fact, I think the registrar I use is based in the UK even though I’m based in the US.)
I know of no studies that show what percent of google.com users in Hungary speak Hungarian. From my stay here this time my impression is that more and more foreigners are populating this town and no, they do not all speak Hungarian.
When signing up for the Adwords service (last time I checked) Google does not ask to what language queries you want your ads to come up. Rather, they ask in what countries your want your ads to be displayed. Maybe they should be asking about both.
Lazyman - thanks, but I know how to set preferences in Google. That wasn’t my point. My point was a comment about default options and assumptions systems make even when the user has expressed certain preferences already. My research on Web-user skill suggests that few people know to tweak things for their preferences usually so default settings matter quite a bit.
Kenny - good point. In this case, however, I’m using my parents’ machine at home and they have not changed any default settings.. and most of their searches are in English as well. (And again, I doubt many users would have changed all sorts of settings at a public machine, but yes, such a machine may suggest a confusing user profile based on its history.)
“Most U.S. advertisers have no interest in reaching an audience in Hungary, where the advertised products won’t be available.”
Funny, I’ve had no trouble ordering product online from Hungary, and getting them delivered to the US. (Warsaw pact surplus electronics components, in this instance, in case you’ve got a need for vacuum tubes to fix that antique radio.)
Keith M Ellis, a while back (on this blog?) had commented that the genius of Google was that it gave you what you wanted, with nothing extra. Most websites cram as many ads as possible, with the result of cognitively jamming the user. IMHO, and in Keith’s opinion (IIRC), Google has been able to avoid this because it’s been a non-profit. It didn’t have to justify quarterly results, but was trying to build a business.
Google’s IPO will be an experiment, of what happens when a market leader enters the profit market as well. I wouldn’t be surprised to see both rational degradation (to make more money) and irrational degradation (because decisions are being made by people thinking about short-term profits and short-term stock prices).
Barry,
strictly speaking Google isn’t a ‘non-profit’. (That term has a specific technical meaning.) Rather, it is closely held. It might or might not make a profit, but it is under no obligation to report on its finances to the public. If it goes through with its long-awaited IPO, then it will of course have to give pretty thorough disclosure of its finances, both in the offering prospectus and on a regular basis thereafter.
Pardon me? You are complaining because the ads don’t work?
Geesh!
Did I say that? But, yeah. Google has been able to get away with doing things that a publicly held company cannot. It will be interesting to see what happens after their IPO.
As someone who worked for a start-up that had a fantastically successful IPO, I can say that going public in general and particularly during the dot.com era was, in my opinion, distorting and created forces that acted against the long-term health of the company. On the other hand, even after the crash and having still yet never earning a profit, the company has a few hundred million in cash and is a survivor. So, hey, what do I know?
But privately owned companies can look to the long-term while publicly held companies face tremendous pressure for short term results. I think Google has been successful because they’ve been far-seeing and very focused (and disciplined). That may change.
Google is in no sense a non-profit; in fact, they claim to be one of the very few Internet startups which turned a profit early and consistently. They were claiming profitability in early 2001, but as mrs tilton notes, their finances are not public, so it might not be true.
Just to add a little bit to this: One reason Google may redirect, or even attempt to override, a user’s desire to go to the “main” search page at google.com, is because of the differing legal requirements of various countries. If you are connecting from an ISP in France, for example, Google and Yahoo will do their darnedest to keep you from accessing their full content, but instead try to redirect you to the cleaned up French versions. (If you’ll recall, Yahoo faced a major lawsuit and worse for not banning all French people from accessing auctions sites where Nazi memorabilia were sold — LICRA v. Yahoo.)
Pilgrim - I would think Google would try to make sure it doesn’t serve up certain results in response to a query based on the IP address of the user not which Google version he or she chooses. With respect to this concern, using info about IP address would seem to be the better way to go.
I work for a large mutinational company & since a recent network upgrade if I type in www.google.com I get instantly referred to www.google.fr. (I am based in scotland). Presumably our network makes google think I am in france. However, if I type in www.google.co.uk I stay there and am not referred.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review