The Guardian reports that US-style paranoia about biased professors has crossed the Atlantic with something called the Young Britons Foundation compiling dossiers about leftie academics. A Manchester student newspaper contacted them with made-up examples
of so called left-wing bias at the University of Manchester - such as a professor who “forced” students to chant Karl Marx during lectures…..
The YBF swallowed the bait and
said the incidents would be added to a database of complaints being made across the country that would go into a report to be presented to the government next year.
Expect to see that chanting professor denounced on a blog somewhere soon!
I have in the past been tempted to make my students chant “Karl Marx,” but only because a small but significant chunk of them insist on calling him “Carl” when they write their papers.
Yeah well so chanting would take care of that, all right!
[collapses in fit of laughter]
Damn, you have exposed my paper-thin rationalization for program of mindless socialist indoctrination.
Coming soon: “Hooked on Dialectics,” the revolutionary spelling system that makes reading Capital a breeze.
Yes… not a terribly good idea in my view. Don’t get me wrong, exposing nutcase leftyism in universities is not in and of itself a good thing - but if you want to do it, you have to do it properly. Trying to do it through people just getting in touch and informing without any system of verification is not a terribly good idea. I believe somebody over at Volokh cobbled together a fairly compelling critique of CampusWatch in the US a couple of months ago. It’s just not a terribly good way of going about things.
Eeek! Freudian slip! I meant, of course that exposing nutcase leftyism in universities is not in and of itself a BAD thing…
“exposing nutcase leftyism in universities is not in and of itself a BAD thing”
Yes, just like exposing witchcraft in Salem wasn’t in and of itself a bad thing. The point is that the cure is usually much worse than the disease - especially as the disease is pretty rare.
I’ve had to fisk Campus Watch a couple of times. It’s kind of funny when they insist something like no Middle East Studies professor today would train someone for a military career, when I can look around and see friends of mine in the program training for military careers. As icing on the cake, our Arabic prof (who was against the attack on Afghanistan, much less Iraq) had as a guest in class a military interpreter just Monday, with whom we all chatted amicably.
Leave it to the Brits to make fun of this deadly serious piece of delicate propaganda making…
but only because a small but significant chunk of them insist on calling him “Carl” when they write their papers.
I guess it’s the same chunk that insists on spelling Adolf Hitler Adolph.
CampusWatch and Horowitz’s crew have a tendency to descend into polemics over some issues, true. But I don’t think this detracts from the strength of their basic position, which is that ‘equal protection’ includes political affiliation and creed, and that the standard to measure institutional discrimination should be applied evenly. Hardly right-wing Red baiting to restate the courts existing position on religious or political protections and ask that it be upheld. (gasp!)
Sometimes it seems as if the Courts ruling on the specifics of the UofMichigan case has been overlooked, as the Michigan ‘point’ system and questionable classification of “under-represented minorities” versus “over-represented minorities” doesn’t look very color blind… at least when the colors in question fail to meet dubious institutional benchmarks. There’s a reasonable cause to suspect that qualified South and East Asian applicants were refused admission once a predetermined statistical figure was satisfied, yet this doesn’t seem to be a concern. Why?
I’d like to nominate a crawford for the “non-sequitor of the month” award.
So when the post read: “The YBF swallowed the bait…” that means that they believed a deliberate lie? When an organization whose goals we may or may not agree with starts to collect information on what they perceive as abuses of collegiate power, it seems odd that the method of disagreement is an attempt to poison their data. Isn’t this the kind of lying and un-truths of which the Bush Administration is constantly accused?
The idea that the YBF may not be validating incoming information is indication enough of how serious its report will later be taken, but isn’t an intentional effort to destroy the truthfulness of the report a little dishonest? A little contemptuous?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review