Count me as a moderate supporter. It’s hard to talk about The Gates – the Christo and Jeanne-Claude installation in Central Park – without sounding pretentious. Like this: “Our memories of this experience are how the artwork changes us — perhaps the most powerful force of art, that the changes made are not in the site, but in us.” I can’t really say that I’m so different than I was a week ago. Sure, I guess they made me think, but that’s something I try to do anyway. The whole thing is just asking for parodies (this is my favorite) and mockery (like this).
But I like them. Let me just say, there are lots of ‘em. There’s no location – on the ground, at least – where you can take in all of them, so there is always a sense that you’re only seeing a very small part of a much larger work – most of it stays out of reach. At the same time, each gate is made on a human scale and is not at all overwhelming. When the wind blows and creates a wave in one after another, the effect is quite beautiful. And together they highlight the different elevations of the park that wouldn’t be so obvious with out them – especially where one path passes on a bridge over another. They call attention to the topography of the park itself and not as much to themselves as you would expect given their construction site orange saffron color.
As my family walked through them, we stopped at a playground so my daughter could play on the swings. There were some young teenage boys hanging out there, smoking and trying to be cool. One of them asked if we knew where the art was supposed to be. My wife pointed to the gates and replied, “That’s it, all around.” They thought this was terribly funny, and one said: “I could do that in my bedroom.” To which the only possible reply was: “You must have some bedroom.”
If you haven’t read it already, may I recommend this collaborative review of Christo’s Gates
In the 60s in San Francisco, the Diggers used to serve free food in the park. Before they did, they set up an empty frame which once held a mirror. There was a sign above it: Frame of Reference. People who wanted to eat had to pass through it so they would all be in the same frame of reference.
That’s what the Gates Project has done to Central Park.
Saw it yesterday with a friend and thought it was like a Chinese procession, the bright color marching throughout the park. It made lots of people smile and think about the park in a new way.
Good for Christo and Jean-Claude!
I’ve got a satellite photo of the Gates at my blog.
I am not sure we are talking about art here.Art carries a vision of the world,a message to us about how to view some aspect of it.I am afraid with Christo we are talking about decoration for the sake of decoration.If is art,is the perfect Neo-liberal art of our times :it says nothing,it simply decorates.
Or it is better simply viewed as a superzised egomaniac imposition on the public landscape.Christo claims the project cost $ 20 million ,but he’ll personaqlly will get many more millions out of it from its documentation in the form of video tapes,CDs,photos,postcards,lectures,travelling shows,etc
Cristoba Senior
If you haven’t seen these daily shows on Christo — you’ve got to check it out. daily show clips .
and and more daily show clips .
Look, I don’t mind if Christo and Jeanne Claude make some money from this….why all the resentment?
I am not sure that the concept in this conceptual art is all that — well, conceptual, but its sheer ambition redefines the scale of public art projects.
I don’t have an opinion on the installation itself, but if I’d been that boy, I’d have shot back with “You’re right, I couldn’t do it in my bedroom. But I could do it in Central Park, if you gave me Central Park to do it in.”
So much of modern art seems to be parasitic on older art. What I see when I see St. Paul’s Cathedral wrapped in plastic is 1% the work of Christo, and 99% the work of Christopher Wren.
If the 1% is worth having, or the 99% would otherwise be routinely ignored, you’re looking at something symbiotic rather than parasitic.
Even though I have no investment in defending Christo’s concepts, when I read posts like Derek’s, it does give me pause about the refusal to recognize what might be original or particular to contemporary art. Derek, I’m afraid that Boileau got there first about parasitic modernism in his 17th century French aesthetic theory defending the greatness of the Ancients (for him it was the Greeks) against the callowness of his contemporaries. For Boileau as for you, it seems, the only good art is old art.
Actually, if you gave the boy Central Park, he still couldn’t do it. Viewed purely as a project—envisaging, gaining approval for, managing and coordinating: fabricating, delivering, assembling, maintaining, tearing down, recycling—this is beyond many, perhaps most people’s capabilities.
On my blog, I separated the technique from the work: the technique is not the work. But to appreciate a work you need to have some sense of the technique. Thick impasto or so flat you can hardly distinguish the brushstrokes makes a difference. It’s hard to talk about Childe Hassam without talking about his adopting impressionism.
Christo’s technique is politico-managerial rather than artisanal. But it exists as surely as Seurat’s dots.
One other point. Christo’s art is not conceptual. It is highly concrete. One experiences these particular gates, at this moment, in this place, against this sun, under these wind conditions, through these branches. A friend in LA who saw The Umbrellas said they were very carefully and specifically placed.
As I wrote to a friend shortly after The Gates were installed:
“No admission fee, no celebrity-studded opening gala, no obnoxious security pushing people around like cattle, no corporate sponsorship. In this day and age, it’s goddamn revolutionary.”
A friend in LA who saw The Umbrellas said they were very carefully and specifically placed.
Well, until one blew over and killed someone.
Just got back from a trip to New York to see the MoMA since its renevation. I took some time to see the Gates and found that for me they upset what Central Park is all about. That is, a place in the middle of the city where you can go to be completely enveloped in nature, free of any indication of the industrialized city around. The gates dispel this magic of Central Park with their steel and modern fabric construction.
Thankfully they will be gone soon.
Richard’s post on the purpose of Cental Park echoed what I heard from some viewers—that the Park was about nature and the Gates disturbed that. This is pretty mind-boggling—haven’t you folks ever seen real nature, for crying out loud? Central Park is stuffed full of lampposts, statues, trash cans, benches, fences, the zoo, you name it. It’s only natural compared to Times Square.
I saw the Umbrellas, too, and in both cases was filled with delight. Why does art always have to be “serious”? I also went to a photo show while in NYC—several hundred dreary black and white photos of unhappy people and squalid settings, illustrating our current love for Deep Irony. Give me color, beauty, and joy every time. It doesn’t paper the world over or make me unfit for facing a rotten environment/government/job, but it gives me hope and vision to carry on with.
“Sure, I guess they made me think, but that’s something I try to do anyway.”
When you read a book, do you read it only for content? Do you read every book merely as a textbook or a manual?
When I read Shakespeare I think of myself as reading a story; as listening in on someone else’s conversation (and being a little guilty about it); as watching a craftsman at work; as feeling emotions I would not otherwise be feeling (or as watching myself being manipulated into feeling those emotions); as being in a museum of the Elizabethan world, and a museum of human behavior in all periods.
The Gates are not that interesting, but they’re not bad. They’re big budget popular art. What amazes me is that it is possible in this country to get an advanced degree in the humanities and know nothing about the ways and means, the function of culture.
It’s kitsch. But guys who spend $21 mil on kitsch are good for the economy.
Another Christo insta-monument. At least it didn’t kill anyone as did his flimsy umbrellas north of LA.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review