I don’t think that I have too much more to say about MEChA; there are a lot of people who I’m not going to convince. But I wanted to share this comment on Kevin Drum’s site from “J” :
Why won’t Bustamante make a statement against separatism or fascism or racism? First of all, it hasn’t been exactly established that this is a MEChA stance. I read the Juan Non-Volokh piece, and in his fisking of Barlow, he also made one mistake that I noticed immediately. He linked to the Berkeley MEChA website, which links to that Aztlan plan that everyone is quoting. However, and there probably is no way Non-Volokh could have known this, Berkeley MEChA is actually not the official MEChA of Berkeley — they split off from the regular MEChA. The regular MEChA branch, however, doesn’t have a website. The Berkeley MEChA is decidedly more radical. You can check out the Office of Student Life listing of student groups and see that there are two MEChA’s listed (this website is for last semester, neither MEChA has registered for the Fall yet). What this says to me is that each MEChA branch is likely to have its own statement of purpose, so someone needs to investigate the branch that Bustamante actually belonged to before they demand that he renounce anything.
I certainly didn’t know that. Hat tip to Henry, who tipped me off.
So would you say that the Berkeley MEChA is more radical, or less radical, than the Judean People’s Front?
Just curious.
Ted, that’s assuming the people attacking Bustamante are actually interested in facts. The evidence suggests that they are not.
ps People’s front of Judea!!
I don’t know much about MEChA, but that reads (to me) like someone saying that everyone should look at each “Operation Rescue” chapter’s platform before assigning criticism. Though, I could be wrong (and it certainly wouldn’t be the first time). Anyway, this is less of an eye-raiser than Bustamente using the “n” word, IMO.
Gosh, I don’t remember right-wing bloggers doing all this parsing about Trent Lott’s statement at the tribute to Strom Thurmond. Many right-wing bloggers gave Lott a really hard time.
It would be pretty simple for Bustamante to denounce the racist component of MEChA. It would be even simpler for left-wing bloggers to denounce the racist component of MEChA. But y’all would rather parse.
For a long time many MEChA chapters were effectively fronts for a small Maoist group which was faux-radical in some ways (Third-Worldist in the extreme), slavishly pro-Democrat in others. I was once involved in setting up a forum on the Democratic Party in LA with members of an independent MEChA, and the forum was packed by LRS MEChA people who (credibly) threatened the independent MEChA people and organisers of the forum with physical violence. I’ve never felt as physically insecure in a political situation except when confronting police officers. It sounds as if not that much has changed. So the analogy with Operation Rescue only holds if Operation Rescue people are as vile to each other as they are to the women they threaten at abortion clinics. The references to Monty Python are not inappropriate but there are real differences.
So this is the big thing over on the right side of the blogosphere now? That they’ve innoculated themselves by attacking Trent Lott (whom they never really liked, and who was transparently racist for 40 years before they deigned to notice), so now any time they accuse someone on the left of racism, everyone on the left MUST attack him or her?
Tell you what, folks. When you relentlessly attack Bush’s South Carolina strategy, Reagan’s “states’ rights” speech, Willie Horton ads, Texas redistricting, the racist majority supporting Judge Moses, and the racist, anti-government “Patriots” that Rove has catered to, we’ll consider calling student cultural groups “racist.” But frankly, by the time y’all are done attacking the mainstream racists on your side, I don’t know that you’ll have time to look for fringe extremists on ours.
PS - Did I mention Schwarzenegger’s board membership on US English, an organization so deeply racist that David freaking Horowitz (and a lot of other righties) resigned from the board? Please, arnold kling, point us to your outrage at that fact.
jroth,
I get it. No one on the right has any moral standing whatsoever until we bow down and apologize for every actual and perceived act of racism ever committed by anyone.
I don’t know anything about Schwarzenegger. I’m not from California, but I doubt that I would vote for him if I were. I don’t believe in the populist hero myth.
I hope that the recall loses, because I want to see Davis serve out his sentence—er, term.
Looks like there’s plenty of innoculation going ‘round.
This stance by the right that Bustamanta must apologize or publicy disavow MEChA reminds me of that story about LBJ. The one where he wants the rumor spread about his opponent in a race committing beastiality. When his aid says, ‘we can’t accuse him of that’, LBJ was supposed to have said, ‘no, but we can make him deny it’.
Everyone wants to eat that cake of theirs. Here’s the logic that I could discern from the convoluted posts and comments on Bustamante: student “cultural groups” aren’t racist because they’re in the minority and therefore have a natural right to identify more strongly with their race/ethnicity; and conservative bloggers have a natural right to criticize ex-student cultural group members running for governor because they are in the minority of media opinion. To test this, just ask yourself, “Is Bustamante going to reclaim CA for Mexico?” (Probably not, and if he did, better for the rest of the nation anyway); “Are the opinions of conservative bloggers going to make their way into CA news recall coverage?” (Not a chance, and if they do, nobody here watches the news anyway).
So at least be consistent. Either minorities have rights or they don’t. Hispanics may be the minority in universities, but conservatives are the minority in the media. But of course there are different standards, right? (Not because it fits your agenda though.)
Harry’s story (one MECHA group threatening the other) verifies that “Mecha” is decentralized and that there’s no control over who can call themselves Mecha, since there’s no authoritative governing body. Given everything we know about Bustamante, I would strongly expect that he was a member of the threatened rather than the threatening Mecha, just as I would expect that in Berkeley he would be a member of the mainstream Mecha rather than the Maoist Mecha, and in the same way that he is an hated enemy rather than a friend of the “Voz de Aztlan”.
So what is the thing that he should apologize for? Being a member of a group which is under attack by a different group using the same name?
I remain convinced that this is an unworthy issue being promulgated by partisan hacks, and that the most appropriate response is to treat it as enemy trash talk, rather than as anything serious.
I can’t believe this issue goes on and on. Does Cruz Bustamente believes that California should be returned to Mexico, or should be an independent Hispanic-ruled state, or whatever other wacko craziness people are finding on websites? Obviously, no. So where’s the issue?
“Does Cruz Bustamente believes that California should be returned to Mexico, or should be an independent Hispanic-ruled state, or whatever other wacko craziness people are finding on websites? Obviously, no. So where’s the issue?”
That’s exactly what many of Trent Lott’s supporters were saying about him—“We know he’s not a racist, so where’s the issue?” I think that they were arrogant and insensitive to the people he offended. Maybe you think they were right.
I posted this on Calpundit, but as I’m still in a crotchety mood I’ll echo it here:
———
However, and there probably is no way Non-Volokh could have known this, Berkeley MEChA is actually not the official MEChA of Berkeley — they split off from the regular MEChA.
Grrrrrrr. Well, I’m in a crotchety mood right now, so I’d like to note that I pointed this out here at Calpundit on August 16th, which I then linked on Tacitus on August 29th and which, fwiw, I repeated on Crooked Timber on September 2nd.
And, for reference, here’s the 1998 Daily Cal article detailing this split between the Berkeley Mechistas, one last time.
Arnold: Actually, the simplest explanation was that Trent Lott was a racist. (The next simplest explanation is that he has no idea why Strom Thurmond ran for President in ‘48, which in its own way would be pretty shocking as well.)
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review