I didn’t do much for my reputation (never a great one) as an election tipster with my assessment of the Australian election. I thought Labor had a good chance (a week or so before the election, I thought a very good chance). In fact, the Howard government won easily1
But I was just about spot-on in my pre-election prediction that,Whatever the outcome, I expect it will be treated in the international press as something of a referendum on the Iraq warwhereas, in reality, the issue barely came up.
an Australian election that was run in no small part as a referendum on the warCan I sue for copyright violation here?
Admittedly, Reynolds isn’t “the international press”, and, as he complains, a lot of papers got the story right rather than printing the fantasy he would prefer. But his words are so close to my prediction that I feel entitled to a bit of a gloat. Heaven knows, we haven’t got much to gloat about in Australia this week.
Anyone with any knowledge of Australia, or even with the capacity to read Australian papers on the Internet, would know that Iraq was barely mentioned either during the election campaign or in the subsequent analysis.
More on this from Tim Lambert .
1 As pointed out in the comments thread, this is a win for the efficient markets hypothesis
Admittedly, Reynolds isn’t “the international press”, … But his words are so close to my prediction that I feel entitled to a bit of a gloat.
Isn’t that kind of like saying that a statement by Charles Johnson vindicates a prediction you made regarding CBS News???
I don’t know much about Australian politics, but I agree with Instapundit that the press would have made the election into an Iraq referendum if Latham had won.
Of course Instapundit is predictable—there are a limited number of ways that punditry can be instantaneous. You could free associate…you could make random comments…or you can have a one-size-fits-all pre-packaged knee-jerk ideological answer to every question… Left as an exercise for the reader: which does Reynolds do?
(Actually, Limbaugh uses a combination of all three strategies…so maybe this is a trick question…)
“I don’t know much about Australian politics, but I agree with Instapundit that the press would have made the election into an Iraq referendum if Latham had won. “
Well, you’re half right.
If you did know much about Australian politics, you’d know that, if Latham had won, the press would have “made” the election about a government that had past its expiry date, a reaction against yet another cynical, fear mongering and deceitful campaign and an appreciation of a party presenting a policy platform that paid some attention to a raft of long neglected social concerns.
Sadly, that’s not the story the press have a chance to tell.
Just wondering, does Reynolds pay you people to hype his blog? He’s an otherwise obscure law perfessor from Tennessee.
“Admittedly, Reynolds isn’t “the international press”,”
Now there’s a quote ripe with potential..
I thought that Australia has had low unemployment and fairly constant economic growth > 2% p.a. ? That’s usually enough to get a governing party reelected.
Ignore the Instapundit. If you take away a germ’s medium, it will die.
I would also add that you posted tha you thought it significant that Latham won the debates on Iraq.
The problem wasn’t that some people didnt want Iraq to be an issue, but rather that the majority of the electorate wasn’t interested.
And I think that what Reynolds is alluding to is that this may also be the case in the US. At the end of the day, outside of the middle class elite, most of the electorate are not going to decide their vote on the basis of a small war in the Middle East.
John, you’re absolutely right that the election was no referendum on the war. But you’ll remember that you made it an impromptu natural experiment of the virtue of the EMH. I think you said that since Howard was heavily favored in the betting odds on the day the election was announced, if he won, we would have to revise upward — to 0.55, I believe — the probability that the EMH was right. That’s a lot more interesting than Glenn Reynolds’ bloviations.
I’m with Steve, the Bayesian inference is by far the most interesting tidbit here (although I didn’t agree with JQ’s reasoning completely).
Now, what would a Bush victory do to your prior? Admittedly on IEM at the moment, it is only a 55% predicted Bush win.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc: Thy name is Glenn Reynolds.
At the end of the day, outside of the middle class elite, most of the electorate are not going to decide their vote on the basis of a small war in the Middle East.
I don’t know what your source is for this, but in the latest Newsweek poll the “situation” in Iraq was third, after “Terrorism and homeland security” (which, as we know, is virtually [and distressingly] indistinguishable from the war in Iraq for much of the American public, and the economy.
And as long as I’m here: would you please clarify for me just what is a “middle class elite”? We didn’t cover that one in my intro to sociology.
Just to clarify: in that Newsweek poll, the Iraq war was the third most common response to the question “Which ONE of the following issues will be MOST important in determining your vote for president this year?”
Steve, you’re quite right that this is a win for the betting markets. I noted this on my blog.
I’m 50-50 again on the US election, so if someone can supply me with the current IEM odds, I’ll estimate the posteriors on the EMH following a Bush win in November.
The IEM WTA market has the probabilities — assuming for the moment you can read these off from prices — at around 55% for Bush. (The IEM is a little strange now because the WTA market has been broken into four smaller markets, but that’s what the numbers sum to.)
The vote-share market, though, which I’ve always thought was more important because you can know — without debate — how accurate the market’s prediction was, has Kerry getting 49.2% of the two-party vote and Bush 50.5%, which is pretty close to 50-50.
uncle
I spent alot of my student years doing polling and believe me waht people tell is important is what they think every one else thinks is important. But at the end of the day they make their mind up generally on very individual issues.
In Australia Latham and Labor wanted to make Iraq and issue and the polls in say march would have told them it was - but in reality it wasnt - it was decided on how happy each average John was.
As for middle class elite, that refers to what ever the perjorative term you have for the chaterati 0 Islington dinner party set, north shore chardonay set or whatever wherever you live. Basically teachers, lawyers, acdemics, accountants, people in the arts etc.
Steve - I thought WTA was ‘winner of the popular vote’ (which is easy to analyse), not ‘winner of the electoral college’ (which is hard to analyse)?
I’m pretty sure that WTA contracts last time paid out on Gore not Bush.
Tim Blair continues to insist that the election was about Iraq. I’ll look at his arguments in a moment, but first let’s look at what everybody else says about this.
Read more at Deltoid
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review