In keeping with the CT tradition of bringing you tomorrow’s talking points today, I thought I’d look a bit further than the current election campaign and consider the implications of a Bush victory. On past form, there’s no reason to suppose that a second term will lead Bush to abandon his tax cuts, or to propose any significant net reduction in expenditure. At least not when there’s an obvious alternative, that only a few shrill Democrat economists and some incredibly out-of-date Republicans would ever object to. The US government has at its disposal and endless source of costless wealth - the printing press that turns out US dollars. Hence there’s no need to do anything tough like raising taxes or cutting Socil Security benefits. The only problem is that, according to some economists, reliance on the printing press as a source of government finance is likely to cause inflation.
As a first line of defence, the views of these economists can be criticised. There are plenty of Keynesian critics of monetarism who’ve pointed out that there’s no simple or automatic relationship between the money supply and the rate of inflation, and probably there are some who’ve been incautious enough to deny that there is any relationship at all. In any case, in the new era, the dynamism of the US economy is such that everyone wants to buy US dollars as fast as the Treasury can print them (ignore any recent observations on currency markets that might suggest otherwise).
Still, these are only delaying tactics. What will really be needed is a set of talking points showing that inflation (properly referred to as price appreciation or something similarly positive) is actually a good thing. In the hope of bringing the debate forward a bit, I’ve advanced a few.
1 I’m not making this one up. As Brad de Long pointed out a while ago, Stephen Moore has actually defended the record of US capitalism on the basis of figures for the number of millionaires, unadjusted for inflation.
Also, the prospect of higher inflation can help revive the struggling American wheelbarrow industry (just like in Germany in the 30’s where you’d take a wheelbarrow full of cash to the store to buy a loaf of bread).
Oh, wait, the wheelbarrows are all made in China now. Never mind!
On first looking into this post I considered suicide. Contemplating inflation was a bit of relief.
I guess I’d have to bail out of municipal bonds and consider investing in a sounder currency than greenbacks, being imperfectly assured that multinational equities equilibrate exchange risks adequately.
On second thought, if suicide is painless…
My favourite argument for inflation is that it deprives cowardly investors of a safe refuge from the risks associated with holding real assets, thereby forcing them to put their wealth to productive use.
I remember a few years back when Pauline Hanson was asked about her - ahem - “economic policies”, and the problem with a lack of cashflow. The gist of her answer was: “print more money”. Needless to say, every journalist jumped on this assertion, screaming “Weimar”. She was not beloved of the establishment for many reasons. (Yes, racism was the biggie, but with a little bit of social snobbery mixed it. Appalling strine she had.)
The sad thing about JQ’s article is a) it is so believable; b) the press would probably let the Republicans get away with it.
Of course triple-digit inflation would occur over Greenspan’s body. Or letter of resignation. But being the vindictive sods that neocons are, they would toss AG on his ass than admit their error. They’ve got short memories that lot.
“When national debts have once been accumulated to a certain degree, there is scarce, I believe, a single instance of their having been fairly and completely paid. The liberation of the public revenue, if it has ever been brought about at all, has always been brought about by a bankruptcy; sometimes by an avowed one, but always by a real one, though frequently by a pretended payment. The raising of the denomination of the coin has been the most usual expedient by which a real public bankruptcy has been disguised under the appearance of a pretended payment.”
- Adam Smith
Other than the opportunity to make a few not particularly amusing jabs at Republicans, was there a point to this post?
You should have pointed out that there were massive budget deficits in the 1980s, and just as critics predicted at the time, the 1990s were times of high inflation, low and negative growth, and deep cuts in popular government programs to fund runaway interest costs.
I think you are too gloomy.
Interest rates will pick up a little over the next few years, but it should also be a good time for investment, especially in Asia. Financial disaster awaits many overstretched lower income families.
To avoid recession, income needs to be switched from the rich savers into the hands of those who save little or nothing: the poor, bottom 20%. An easy way to do this is to reverse some of the recent tax cuts, but then divert some of the tax clawed back into the pockets of those low-income 100% spenders. The only trick is to work out how to focus such tax-cuts.
This is a pretty silly post which explains a great deal of the reason why inflation is likely to be a problem over the next year – namely that large sections of the chaterati are more interested in pinning the blame of inflation on BUSH as opposed to where responsibility really lies namely at the foot of Alan Greenspan. Of course the Republicans have to shoulder some blame for rubber stamping his reappointment without really questioning his actions but you do feel that the democrats seem strangely unquestioning of the guys performance.
But the more important missing point is the demographic effect – namely that inflation tends to transfer wealth from the (retiring) old to the (working) young. And this is where the biggest political split opens up since the old are mainly democrat while the young are Republican.
No doubt, they think they’re buying leverage, but all they’re really going to get is pictures of Ronald Reagan. Heh.
Neal Stephenson’s sf novel, Snow Crash, features a US ravaged, among other things, by hyperinflation, in which 500 million dollar bills are called “Meeses,” because they have Ed’s picture on ‘em, and one billion dollar bills are “Gippers,” because they have Ronnie’s.
The Republican case for inflation is better than Quiggin admits, however. As interest rates rise, US debt obligations will rise as well. When financial income reverses as well, the US starts falling into a serious debt trap. And the best way to get out of a debt trap? Inflate your debts away.
This article in the economist raises an interesting alternative scenario - namely that the the years of loose monetary policy has created a monetary trap and a future of deflation.
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=S%27%298L%2BQ%21%3B%23%210%234%0A
General G has it right, IMO. I’ve been saying for a long time that there is just no point in being the global monetary and military hegemon if you’re not going to take advantage of it from time to time. Also note that an inflation tax has its main incidence on 1) the poor and 2) foreigners, so there’s not much not to like.
I was an English major in undergrad, so I don’t understand this… “economics”? That’s what you call it, right?
Anyway, would this hypothetical inflation also “inflate away” student loans?
So Bull, you’re saying that (as happened after the 1980s) the government is about to be taken over by the opposition party, which will eliminate the deficit and usher in a period of prosperity? Sounds good.
(Yes, the budget didn’t get back into balance until well into the Clinton boom, but fiscally responsible policies were put in place at the beginning of his Administration.)
A few minor points:
“There’s a trade-off, in the short run, between unemployment and inflation. If you go back far enough, you can find plenty of Keynesian economists asserting that this trade-off also occurs in the long run.”
-And a reasonably good case can be made for a negative tradeoff in the long run, if real money balances and consumption are complementary. I happen to think that this is likely.
“Inflation turns ordinary working people into millionaires.”
-Quadrillionaires if we’re talking about lire. Imagine how Republican the Turks must be!
“Democrats are opposed to inflation. Indeed.”
-Only when Republicans are in power. LBJ and Carter didn’t seem to mind.
“Inflation hurts the poor….”
-How so? I would think that an unanticipated bout of inflation reduces the real value of debt, redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor.
“Inflation is anti-Communist. For several years now, one of the biggest buyers of US government bonds has been the Chinese central bank. No doubt, they think they’re buying leverage, but all they’re really going to get is pictures of Ronald Reagan. Heh.”
-Sounds like fun. Maybe throw in some pictures of Nixon.
“Inflation will destroy trust in government money and encourage the creation of private-sector alternatives.”
-Give those gold-standard cranks something to do, I guess.
“Inflation is part of the American patriotic tradition….”
-And of the Russian, French, German, and Hungarian patriotic traditions too. What better way would there be to reach out to our friends in Europe? Sounds like a John Kerry campaign promise to me.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review