Judging from the comments to yesterday’s post on religion and politics, people seem to be quite interested in the topic. So I thought I’d post a pointer to this NYTimes article that discusses a paper by three economists about “Why Republicans and Democrats Divide on Religious Values”.1
1 I’d say more, but I have a flight to catch.
I really wish Democrats would have made more of the fact that Bush doesn’t attend church on Sundays. I was surprised that Kerry didn’t mention that during the debates.
I don’t think talking about Bush’s church attendance would have mattered. Ronald Reagan rarely darkened the door of a church, but he was adored by the religious right who rejected the genuinely Christian Jimmy Carter.
Bush would simply have brushed it off, as Reagan did, by saying he didn’t want to inconvenience a congregation by subjecting them to the security screenings. Of course that didn’t stop Clinton. I saw him at church often, though I did find the metal detectors they brought in on those Sundays annoying.
Not surprising. Where religious participation is de facto as well as de jure voluntary, church-goers self-select—people become religiously involved because they are committed to a socially conservative agenda which, they believe, churches will support and enforce. They’re religious because they’re socially conservative rather than vice versa. They go “church-shopping” for churches that preach the moral agenda to which they’re committed and when churches don’t give them what they want they leave.
Lots of Americans see churches as the last institutions in the US that support conservative social values. Liberal mainline churches are dying because they don’t do that job. To see the dynamic in action, check out the current debate in the Episcopal Church about gay marriage and the ordination of openly active homosexuals. Most Americans see religion primarily in terms of its instrumental value—supporting “morality” as they understand it.
If this is correct, then Democrats are not going to win hearts and minds by making more religious noises or even citing Scripture to make the case that Jesus would have approved of their program. Even if Kerry had talked Jesus talk throughout his campaign and pulled out the rosary he carried in Vietnam, it wouldn’t have made a whit of difference.
Further support for this, apropos of the last comment, note that the religious right supported Reagan who had no serious religious affiliation against Carter, a serious, committed Baptist.
When I was young there were many more opportunities for encounters with people I didn’t know than there are now. A lot of those people were under the influence of the many different substances then available. It took me far too long to realize that very often, especially in a conversation with another male when females were present, the subject of the conversation, the actual content, had nothing to do with what was taking place.
I’ve seen the left, as represented online, over and over ridiculing the religious right - the creationists and homophobes, the “family values” champions and the deadly anti-abortionists - and backing up that ridicule with brief cogent refutations of the nonsense espoused by their targets.
And I said and kept saying, that it had nothing to do with logic or reason; that they recognized, as the left did not, that this was a struggle for dominance, not truth. Too many of us adopted the codes of the educational system, where the right answer ensures your survival, and the wrong answer - illogic and irrationality - condemns. But in the real world, the one where we just had an election, rationality means very little outside the landscape of mechanical engineering. Power is all, and power has almost no connection to abstract logic. It makes its own logic, as you’ve recently been informed by one of the myrmidons currently preening themselves in Washington - they’re making their own reality. They invented the moral codes you want to apply to them, they own morality, and can bend it however they wish, or dispense with it all together.
The particular subjects - creation, divinity, war, murder, human rights - are all peripheral to the central truth: the winners write the book, there is no deep morality; none deeper than us anyway.
Like those old, stoned, conversations, being the obvious winner of logical, rhetorical competition is the consolation prize. Sooner or later it comes down to who’s willing to battle; and as anyone can see, the outcome of that has nothing to do with morality, at all.
I think the above writers make an excellent point about power, politics and religion in today’s america…that politics follows religion and vice versa seem to be the crux of this discussion. a very Nietzschen view. the question that needs to be addressed though, once the dust clears, is power for what??? what is the average southern baptist planning on achieving by having a southern republican in power? is the motivation a positive one, in the sense of retaining and maintaining the existing system of individualistic capitalism tied to protestant values, or even recreating and recapturing an idealized american glorious past founded on american republican values backed by military force? or is the motivation negatively motivated, that is, based on fear of “the other” i.e,, homosexuals, blacks, women libbers, immigrants, etc.? the questions seems to be an intransigent one since it may actually be a weird combination of both, in which the conservative voter himself may not be able to give a straight answer, or at least a rational one.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review