David Frum sinks even deeper into the Mariana trench.
Speaking of media bias, here’s a question you won’t hear in our big papers or on network TV: Does Yasser Arafat have AIDS?
We know he has a blood disease that is depressing his immune system. We know that he has suddenly dropped considerable weight – possibly as much as 1/3 of all his body weight. We know that he is suffering intermittent mental dysfunction. What does this sound like?
Former Romanian intelligence chief Ion Pacepa tells in his very interesting memoirs that the Ceaucescu regime taped Arafat’s orgies with his body guards. If true, Arafat would a great deal to conceal from his people and his murderously anti-homosexual supporters in the Islamic world.
via Bookslut.
Arabs… terrorists… Frenchmen… homosexuals… disease… precious bodily fluids!
Before we launch into one of our patented anti-homophobic tirades, can someone explain to me what’s wrong with the hypothesis that Arafat has AIDS?
It accounts for the secrecy surrounding Arafat’s condition—all these unlikely claims about baffled doctors.
It is entirely plausible a) that Arafat likes fucking men (lots of men do, and if we’re so supportive of homosexuality, there’s no reason to dismiss that as absurd) and b) that if he does like fucking men, he would most definitely have to conceal that from his supporters (given the progressive sexual values of Arab cultures).
AIDS strikes me as a distinct possibility here, however much you want to impugn Frum’s motives.
When I think of credibility, Ceausecu’s intelligence apparatus comes immediately to mind. And why would memoirs of this type be filled with lurid details when it’s well known that they do little to sell books?
I place near-zero value on the story.
If such tapes (or other credible testimony) existed, Mossad would have long ago uncovered them and made them public, so as to accelerate the dethronement of Arafat.
I’m not saying this as an anti-Israeli thing, just a reflection of how hardball politics in the region are and how nasty intelligence services in general are.
is entirely plausible a) that Arafat likes fucking men (lots of men do, and if we’re so supportive of homosexuality, there’s no reason to dismiss that as absurd)
Well, David Frum is most emphatically not “so supportive of homosexuality,” so I’m not inclined to take his speculation on Arafat’s sexuality as value-neutral.
Incidentally, James Taranto (the guy who puts the ‘rant’ in taranto) has been doing the same wallowing as Frum with the Arafat-AIDS hypothesis (link below). And what’s wrong with the hypothesis? Intrinsically, nothing. Just the evident pleasure that certain people find in it.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110005839
(scroll down to ‘what ails arafat’)
he would most definitely have to conceal that from his supporters (given the progressive sexual values of Arab cultures).
abu nawas’ mother would like a word with you.
what’s wrong with the hypothesis that Arafat has AIDS?
Search Google News for where these speculations are being published and you’ll see.
No Preference: That is ad hominem and I claim Dan Hardie’s £50!
“AIDS strikes me as a distinct possibility here, however much you want to impugn Frum’s motives.”
I don’t give a damn about Arafat’s sex life. God help us, that I even wrote that sentence. Much more fun and more useful to impugn and think about Frum’s motives. Is Arafat evil because he is gay, or gay because he is evil? These are the critical questions for our times. :)
Is it okay to get nasty yet, Henry?
If Arafat were deathly ill with something that appeared suspiciously like tertiary syphilis, and rumors had swirled for years about his orgies with young female assistants, does anybody doubt that David Frum would enthusiastically weigh in with a speculation to that effect? And if he did, would anybody dream of accusing him of heterophobia?
By the way, the speculation about Arafat and his bodyguards has been around for very a long time—Oriana Fallaci was engaging in it decades ago, back when she was still a pro-Palestinian leftist (who nevertheless found Arafat personally revolting).
And of course, if there is a direct connection between homosexuality and Islamist terrorism, we need to think about expanding our concepts or extraordinary rendition, add some new provisions to the Patriot Act,
and renew our scrutiny of the insidious media.
I guess Edward at Obsidian Wings has renewed reason to worry for his partner.
“When I think of credibility, Ceausecu’s intelligence apparatus comes immediately to mind. “
Exactly my thoughts!
Makes you wish they were still around and in charge of the whole WMD in Iraq thing.
You know, I’ve seen Romanian intelligence cited as a source of many a crazy rumor of late. What’s going on with those guys?
By they way, Saddam also lost a lot of weight. And he has grown a beard. No doubt to hide a less than healthy skin. And his hair is thinning out. What does this sound like?
Former Pinochet senior advisor John Blackbridge tells in his very interesting memoirs that the Chilean regime taped very interesting videos of Saddam eating his own nuclear, biological and chemical arsenal. With a side dish of pork. And washing it all down with Californian wines. And Osama was there too! If true, this would undisputably prove that Bush has more moral coherence.
“AIDS strikes me as a distinct possibility here, however much you want to impugn Frum’s motives.”
Well, if speculation supported by no evidence whatever qualifies as a “distinct possibility,” then you are right. Personally, I prefer to speculate that Bush caught AIDS from sex with Putin, and passed it on in a sexual encounter with Sharon-I have just as much evidence for that as Frum has for his speculation.
I can’t decde whether Frum is trying to slander Arafat, or gays—maybe both.
Arafat, Frum, Ceausescu, Taranto, Fallaci, I think we’ve reached the credibility quota already.
I thought the obvious reason for the secrecy surrounding Arafat’s condition is that the Palestinian leadership don’t want us to know that the king is dead until they have someone else about whom to say, Long live the king.
But hey, why use the razor when we can engage in deliciously disgusted fantasies about an enemy’s sexual behavior?
Does this make Frum a runner up to Derbyshire in the NR “Homophobe Who Seems Weirdly Interested in Gay Sex” sweepstakes?
Arafat’s condition sounds more like the descriptions of arsenic poisoning I’ve been seening on A&E’s true crime shows…
AIDS as a disease does not present clinically present like Arafat’s symptoms (at least as described in the media). Thrombocytopenia (deficiency of platelets) is much more likely to indicate a tumor or cancerous process of some kind while it would have been obvious from his lymphocyte count if he had AIDS. If I was his doctor, that would be far down the list of things I would suspect (behind much more probably possibilities like gastric cancer, gastritis, ulcerative hemorrhage, etc.).
“what’s wrong with the hypothesis that Arafat has AIDS?
Search Google News for where these speculations are being published and you’ll see.”
I tried. This was my first hit.
http://www.gaywired.com/article.cfm?section=9&id=4583
Ai yi yi.
1) Arafat, homosexual encounters, Romanian intelligence: plausible. There are several independent sources for this.
The most famous one is Ion Pacepa, former chief of Ceaucescu’s DIE — the external intelligence agency, Romania’s equivalent to the CIA or Mossad. Pacepa defected to the US in 1977; he was the highest-ranking spy ever to defect, from either side, during the Cold War.
Pacepa published numerous accounts of his life with the Ceausescus and their friends. The most famous is his book Red Horizons, written in 1988 and still in print. Red Horizons is very, very self-serving — Pacepa depicts himself as an honest man disgusted by Ceausescu and his decadent antics — but otherwise, the book has held up remarkably well. Several of the more lurid anecdotes, implausible on first impression, were confirmed when the archives of Ceausescu’s Securitate were (briefly and partially) opened. For instance, in 1988 it was hard to believe that the President of Romania loved grainy, black-and-white amateur porn, the sleazier the better, and watched it almost every day. But by 1990 it was known that this was exactly and precisely the case; the new Romanian government displayed Ceausescu’s tape collection for several weeks after the Revolution.
Perhaps more to the point, nobody has ever convincingly disproved or refuted any of Pacepa’s assertions. His descriptions of Ceausescu’s family and associates are all very accurate, as is his chronology of events.
What do experts think of the book? Well, I can’t speak for the intelligence community generally, but my former Security Policy instructor at Yale — ex-general and former NSA Director Bill Odom — considered it a useful and reliable text. (This is the same Bill Odom who has become quietly famous in the intelligence community for his scathing critiques of the Bush administration.)
Furthermore: here in Romania, Pacepa is widely disliked and despised as a traitor. But the veracity of his descriptions is universally accepted. Even people who loathe him concede that he’s telling the truth.
So, when Pacepa describes listening to tapes of Arafat “making love to his bodyguard, roaring like a tiger” — I’m inclined to believe him. If you read the book, you’ll find that this description comes in the middle of a long and remarkably well-informed analysis of Middle Eastern politics c. 1977, with particular attention to Arafat’s relations with Jordan and Egypt. It’s a sensational detail, but it’s more or less a throwaway line in a general description of Arafat’s character and goals. (Pacepa’s summary is succinct: “I’d never seen so much cleverness, blood and filth all in one man.”) IMO that makes it even more plausible, but if you’re really worried about it pick up the book — it’s widely available — and decide for yourself.
Note: the book is published by Regnery Press. Does the argumentum ad hominem apply to publishers? Regnery is a right-wing house that publishes a great deal of crap. Remarkable, awful, stupid crap. Nevertheless, I say again, the book stands on its own merits.
2) Arafat, AIDS: Oh, for shit’s sake. The encounters described took place in 1977.
Further: even if Arafat had a homosexual hidden life for the next 27 years… well, to die of AIDS in 2004, he would need to have contracted it after about 1993, and more likely after 1997. (The incubation period for HIV varies widely, but very rarely goes over 10 years without treatment.) This was a very public period in Arafat’s life; he was also already well into his 60s. I suppose it’s remotely possible that he was keeping gay lovers on the side while living under intense scrutiny in the West Bank, but it seems a stretch.
Final thought: he was 75 years old. That’s old anywhere; it’s very old for an Arab man of his generation. (I say “Arab” only because there’s some dispute whether Arafat was fully Palestinian or part Egyptian. Either way, there aren’t too many of the 1929 birth cohort still around.)
75 year old men drop dead all the time. The fact that he was boinking his bodyguard in Ceausescu’s spare bedroom 27 years ago has, very probably, not a damn thing to do with it.
Sheesh.
Doug M.
“We know he has a blood disease that is depressing his immune system. We know that he has suddenly dropped considerable weight – possibly as much as 1/3 of all his body weight. We know that he is suffering intermittent mental dysfunction. What does this sound like?”
Um, a really, really old guy?
Life Outruns Satire: I remember when the US Army in Iraq shot up what appears to have been a wedding party, Steve Bell published a cartoon in the Guardian in which the US spokesman Kimmit posed in front of a video of the guests, intoning ‘this was no normal wedding, this was a Gay Terrorist Wedding’.
Oh, and re this: ‘I claim Dan Hardie’s £50!’
‘That’s $50, chiseler.’
It was £50, me being British an’ all, it was on offer to a halfwit defending another halfwit from the charge of making false statements about Martin Luther King, and, alas, the money is safe.
The comment about arsenic, above, echoes something I’ve been thinking.
I’m surprised the Islamic ‘street’ isn’t saying that he was poisoned by Mossad.
Arafat = bad man and terrorist
Arafat = homosexual
homosexual = terrorist
That’s why I’m worried about the links being made in the far right wing mind about this. To you and me it doesn’t make any difference whether he is gay or straight, but to a more twisted mind, it’d serve as evidence of Satanic endorsement of Islam and homosexuality, and it’d link the two. That’d be a bad thing.
I was astounded by Frum’s line about the odious Richard Littlejohn who he hails as “Probably Britain’s best-read political columnist”.
Um, no, really.
Roy Cohn died of aids, and concealed the fact.
Roy Cohn was a Bad Man and a Jew.
Roy Cohn worked for Joseph McCarthy, therefore Ann Coulter is an insane bitch.
Am I tracking the logic here correctly?
No offense to anyone, but the description of his problems sounds a lot like leukemia.
http://www.leukemia.org/hm_lls for more information.
S_bethy: “Am I tracking the logic here correctly?”
Whose? If your own, then maybe; since Frum said nothing along those lines.
John: “That’s why I’m worried about the links being made in the far right wing mind about this. To you and me it doesn’t make any difference whether he is gay or straight, but to a more twisted mind, it’d serve as evidence of Satanic endorsement of Islam and homosexuality, and it’d link the two. That’d be a bad thing.”
And did Frum make any such connection? Or did he, in fact, assert the contrary in noting that the “Islamic world” is “anti-homosexual”? Indeed, the source breaking the story seems not to be the Great Right Wing Slur Machine but a gay365.com correspondent -
See: http://www.365gay.com/newscon04/11/110104arafat.htm
Poor Gay365 correspondent - blamed for his efforts, possibly responsible for “rightwing” type sentiments and - god forbid - bigotry! Oh, and sinking as we speak into the murky depths of the Mariana Trench.
And of course, to Henry, Instapunditry is “scuzzy innuendo”, while his own exercise in impugning Frum’s motives isn’t.
Methinks CT needs to work the bitterness out of the system, and stop lashing out blindly. Friendly fire, and all that.
Correction: the gay365 correspondent posted the article on Nov 1st, after Frum. But he ran with it, regardless!
First of all, thank you to Vik, and Doug Muir, who actually helped answer the question.
SEcond of all, as an atheist rightwing nutjob, I’d say that Frum would happily transmit rumors that Arafat had syphilis, or alcohol poisoning, or trichinosis from eating pork, or anything that would drive a wedge between Arafat and the Islamist members of what we might call the worldwide anti-Zionist terrorist coalition.
BTW, Doug Muir, I’ve been slowly noodling the last few weeks about an alt-history where Gore runs in 2000 as the candidate of Peace, Prosperity and a President With Pants, (instead of as Harold Ickes 2000), winning a Bush-style “landslide” in 2000 and dispelling the Democrats-are-anti-American-wimps trope. Probably a big Nader-McKinney vote in 2004, for one thing.
Does David Frum have oral diarrhoea? Yes.
Hoo, boy. Can’t put one over on Frum, can ya? He’s realized that someone wants us to think that Arafat has AIDS, some rival in the Palestinian leadership.
http://www.nationalreview.com/frum/frum-diary.asp
And why, pray tell, does the BBC insists on using this slimy bastard (Frum that is) again and again and again?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review