OMG! It’s recently been brought to my attention that I’ve only written one post for CT this whole month! That’s, like, totally weak! Under our new posting rules, I’m going to be bringing my A game, every single day. “No Scrubs” is going to be playing in my cubicle 24-7. And if I slack off, dsquared is going to subject me to ferocious Welsh discipline, of the sort handed out at the gloomy Welsh “public” school he attended starting at age 3. (I can’t go into it here, but it involves leeks. And that white jack thingy from bowls.) Let’s see…um…there must be something out there on the interweb. Here we go, something funny a straight white guy said!:
I’m glad the press is having a dance party with this, because God knows the Democrats are frozen at the steering wheel. I just saw a segment on MSNBC (which has been all over the Kerik story today, bless Rick Kaplan’s cyborg heart) pitting a Republican strategist against a Democratic one, and the Democratic spokesman—who goes by the name of Michael Brown—seemed to have washed down his weeny pills with warm Ovaltine. Instead of kicking Kerik and Giuliana between the uprights for three points, Brown fretted that vetting process for cabinet candidates was “going to far,” and that we were in danger of discouraging people from public service. Oh no, we wouldn’t want to discourage philandering, pocket-lining, deadbeat no-show bully-boys like Bernard Kerik from having the opportunity to muck around with our civil liberties in the name of “national security” and hold bigshot press conferences. I mean, if that sort of thing were to continue happening, people might start mistaking the Democrats for an opposition party and thinking that the press has an adversarial role to play, and we don’t want that to happen, it might actually lead to signs of life in that mausoleum we call the nation’s capital. This Michael Brown wouldn’t even criticize Alberto Gonzalez for botching the background check and vetting of Kerik. I don’t understand the self-emasculation of so many Democratic strategists, what they’re afraid of, why they concede so much in advance. Give them an opening, and they close it like a silk kimono, ever so demure. What are they in politics for, the professional grooming tips?
You know, James Wolcott could be totally gay. I’m agnostic on this front. I know, I’ll ask one of my male co-bloggers! They know so much stuff, it’s awesome. Guys? Oh, and, does anyone want a coffee?
I’d been wondering for a while if this blog really existed, or whether it was an “Ally McBeal”-like projection into the external world of my internal fantasy life, and the evidence does appear to be piling up.
See? That’s what you were missing! A KLo type to fill in the dead periods!
Wollcott occasionally refers to his wife. But she works, so she probably isn’t straight, at least in a Promise Keepers sort of way.
You could increase your posting stats by doing joint posts with the other CT laydeez. Oh yes. Do that, please.
Is there a point here?
You know, James Wolcott could be totally gay.
If he were, I would have asked him to marry me by now.
Yes, indeed, Belle; what is the point here?
What is needed is not the pitiably false-conscious snark of a token female Timberite. What is needed is (if not affirmative action per se) an end to the silence, the silly attempts to suggest the gender asymmetry of CT doesn’t exist, and perhaps an analysis of the mechanisms that produce it.
Yes, indeed, Belle; what is the point here?
What is needed is not the pitiably false-conscious snark of a token female Timberite. What is needed is (if not affirmative action per se) an end to the silence, the silly attempts to suggest the gender asymmetry of CT doesn’t exist, and perhaps an analysis of the mechanisms that produce it.
I also would like to protest the shameful underrepresentation of Americans.
(not really. But, what happened to Ted?)
I blame capitalism myself. What about the workers! Why are approximately 100 per cent of the posts at CT by namby-pamby intellectuals and running -dog lackeys of imperialism?
Either Belle’s point is to call out the progressive Wolcott for employing sexist imagery, or her point sailed right by me.
“What is needed is …an end to the silence, the silly attempts to suggest the gender asymmetry of CT doesn’t exist, and perhaps an analysis of the mechanisms that produce it.”
Surely before we analyse the mechanisms that produce the gender imbalance, we should decide whether the gender asymmetry is important? There’s a potentially interesting discussion to be had about women blogging, but why single out CT for analysis? Why suggest that Belle is a token female?
“What is needed is (if not affirmative action per se) an end to the silence, the silly attempts to suggest the gender asymmetry of CT doesn’t exist, and perhaps an analysis of the mechanisms that produce it.”
I have to assume you aren’t taking the piss, dsquared style?
To reiterate comments already made by others:
Is there any reason why Crooked Timber ought to display gender symmetry?
Is there some reason why gender symmetry ought to be privileged over other forms of symmetry?
I note the absence, among Crooked Timber authors, of the illiterate and uneducated, Scots, Icelanders, teenagers, old age pensioners, non-English speakers, etc. etc.
Is there some kind of screaming sense-of-humour bypass here?
While we feverishly await meaningful analysis, here’s a quick quiz for the Timberites to shed some insight on the sexual dynamics of their internet presence. Apart from Ally McBeal, which tv series would your blog resemble most?
a) Sex and the city (where women are too busy shopping, that’s why they post less)
b) CSI (where only the women have a private life, which would also explain why the men post more)
c) the L word (which would require the men to be all like Shane, girl with a guy name. After all we haven’t seen the pictures… Or, ex boyfriends dumped for hot French lesbians. Their higher posting rate thus explained as coping mechanism.)
I always pictured Crooked Timber as more of an Aaron Spelling production.
I rather fancy us as The West Wing, but I know I’ll get into trouble if I try to match Timberites to WW characters…..
Really? I think CT has more than enough unseemly self-righteousness to have been produced by David E. Kelley.
“Is there any reason why Crooked Timber ought to display gender symmetry?”
Why are commenters at CT using patriarchal dichotomous reactionary language like “gender symmetry.” Isn’t this illegal in England yet?
Son Volt: I’m pretty sure she posted the Wolcott excerpt just ‘cause it’s funny.
Yeah, really: who are you and what have you done with Ted Barlow? Sometimes it seems like the only American posts we get around here are by a Hungarian.
Son Volt: it’s a kind of followup to the “CT gender balance” discussion in the comments started by Deb Frisch here
I wonder who has the lowest meme/word ratio of the CT regulars?
There is a LOT of competition for this honor (and if we included the commenters, we’d need several dozen gold medals!)
I wonder who has the lowest meme/word ratio of the CT regulars?
There is a LOT of competition for this honor (and if we included the commenters, we’d need several dozen gold medals!)
Wollcott occasionally refers to his wife. But she works, so she probably isn’t straight, at least in a Promise Keepers sort of way.
Heh. SLF seeks SGM for light topping and domestic partner benefits. No moderates.
It’s hard to figure out who’s working at a deeper level of abstract irony here — Belle, Mrs. Tilton or Deb Frisch. What is needed is not the pitiably false-conscious snark of a token female Timberite. What is needed is (if not affirmative action per se) an end to the silence, the silly attempts to suggest the gender asymmetry of CT doesn’t exist, and perhaps an analysis of the mechanisms that produce it. Is that for real? What’s next — a take back the blog march?
So, how about that coffee?
Well, it is kind of a giggle that so many regulars are in denial about this “gender imbalance” that obviously clearly exists. Does make you wonder where they stand on affirmative action.
But OTH what the hell does Deb Frisch want. It’s pretty hard to argue about systemic discrimination at blogspot.
Let’s hear it deb, what do you want? To join CT? To nominate someone to join CT? To start your own blog?
It wasn’t clear to me if dsquare thinks the evidence is piling up in favor of his solipsism or against it. As one of the anxious figments of his imagination, I’d kinda like to know.
On the gender thing, maybe affirmative action would be a good idea. Three of my favorite lefty political bloggers are female, but I don’t think they’re academics. I don’t know for sure.
George,
I can’t claim that my comment above had much depth, but it may be that it was not altogether free of the taint of irony.
Incidentally, an increased female presence in the group blog in which I (sporadically) participate is one of the things we’d like to see. I think, though, that this is less from a concern to redress asymmetries than from a general desire to see less use of the f-word and insider acronyms.
OK, that was snarky, and the gender imbalance in the blogosphere is worthy of serious investigation. deb was just getting on my nerves. I have considered posting seriously about this issue for some time, but I just can’t figure out what to say. hence the descent into K-Lo manquee.
There’s a quick and easy solution to this whole issue of “gender symmetry ” on CT.
Just carry out a little online ‘gender reassignment’. Enter a new name in a box and voila. No surgery involved.
Then everyone could amuse themselves trying to guess which CTite sported what genitalia and secondary sexual characteristics - based on content not branding.
Mrs. Tilton:
Perhaps in the process of carrying out your suggestions, asymmetries will end up being redressed.
To redress asymmetries, isn’t this another definition for the word “armageddon?”
The mostly likely cause of gender imbalance in the blogosphere can be summed up in one word: sublimation.
That someone can earnestly use the expression “meme/word ratio” is an embarassment in itself.
Perhaps in the process of carrying out your suggestions, asymmetries will end up being redressed
Oh, I should certainly hope so, Cloquet; but surely that would be a secondary effect? (And what if we found a great female blogger on European affairs who swears like a sailor and is addicted to esoteric acronymities?)
To Mrs. T.:
“And what if we found a great female blogger on European affairs who swears like a sailor and is addicted to esoteric acronymities?)”
Why, you should add her to the list pronto!! haha! She can have wonderful exchange of conversation with Dsquared!! haha! I would certainly love to see that!!
I agree with Junius Ponds, Kieran you buy coffee and muffies for all, for all the trouble you’ve caused around here. haha!
Just an added note, I observe that Volokh Conspiracy bloggers have pictures, and the male participants are all definitely cute.
What have you CT bloggers got to say for yourselves?
If the sexiest thing about a person is their voice*, then the way to work out the cuteness of the CT bloggers is to listen to the sexiness of their voices in our own heads.
For me, that’s a fantastic argument for more women.
*it’s because ideas can be erotic. Don’t deny it - you know it’s true.
I’ve decided that this glass ceiling for female bloggers business has gone too far, and I must do my part.
I was about to launch - any day now, really - my own blog, discussing general topics from a high-level perspective, which was to be called “Frown Blog.” It was going to be a great, great blog, perhaps not quite so illimitably great as Fafblog of course, but coming up close in second place, and it would soon be the hot spot for everyone who is anyone throughout the entire blogosphere.
Early indications showed that “Frown Blog” was going to be blogtastic, blogmatic, fabu blogodelic and that the commenters would be the creme de la creme of the blog1337. Y’all were invited, of course.
But now, alerted to this outrage of numerical discrimination - three percent, seven percent, whatever, it’s not enough - I’m going to have to disappoint the eager crowds. No “Frown Blog” for you sexists. I shall not blog until all the sisters are freely blogging too.
For how can I, as a man, enjoy my blogerty, when these women are so cruelly tramped down in blogmission?
(I know, you all hate me now.)
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review