A few quick links from around the blogosphere as I gear up to start teaching again …
Scott McLemee in TAP on teenage crushes and Susan Sontag.
Kevin Drum professes puzzlement about why Bush has been flogging the dead horse of social security; Mark Schmitt provides a plausible reason why.
Brad DeLong on the “Salvador Option”:
To claim that American officers calling for a “Salvador option” are unaware that they are calling for Death Squads is as incredible as claiming that Plantagenets calling for a “Canterbury option” are unaware of murder in the cathedral.
Finally, the BlogPAC sets up its There Is No Crisis website (via Matt Yglesias). And a good thing too. A few weeks ago, Matt, Mark Schmitt and I had a good conversation about the need to build some sort of organization around the intellectual energy of the left blogosphere’s discussion of Social Security. This is a great start.
Finally, the BlogPAC sets up its There Is No Crisis website (via Matt Yglesias). And a good thing too. A few weeks ago, Matt, Mark Schmitt and I had a good conversation about the need to build some sort of organization around the intellectual energy of the left blogosphere’s discussion of Social Security. This is a great start.
It doesn’t say much for the “intellectual energy” of the left of the blogosphere that this is the best they can come up with. The fact of the matter is you’ve already lost the argument that Social Security is a problem* and rather than try to participate in finding a workable solution, you’ve opted to become the play the part of ostriches denying that there is a problem.
Enjoy your stay in the political wilderness, looks like you’re determined to be there a while.
Thorley, now that you’ve set us all straight, tell it to those wild-eyed lefties over at Time Magazine:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1018030,00.html
Okay, Thorley, please explain something. What is it with bizarre expressions like “Democrat president” (or “Democrat party”) when the correct usage is “Democratic”?
I hear this on the TV from right-wing nutjobs all the time, and it puzzles me. It makes anyone using it sound, well, semiliterate is being nice about it.
Is it a code signal? A way for right-wing nutjobs to identify one another?
Has a nastier connotation; something about that “at” ending makes it sound bad, like racist/homophobic/etc.
Just curious: how does one initiate a discussion on this forum?
I ask because there is an interesting article in the Asia Times about the recent Ukranian election.
Also, I appreciate that this forum is censored (moderated) and hence this post will be removed to stop it detracting from the original post.
Thorley, now that you’ve set us all straight, tell it to those wild-eyed lefties over at Time Magazine:No need, they’ve ended up conceding the argument. From the Time magazine article you so thoughtfully provided:
As early as 2018, Bush said, “you’re either going to have to raise the taxes of people or reduce the benefits.” At another appearance intended to promote federal standards for testing high school students, Bush went off script to warn a group of teenagers, “The system will be bankrupt by the year 2040.”Bush is clearly stating then that unless we do something to change the system, we are looking at raising taxes [and/]or cutting benefits. Later on in the Time article they end up admitting:
That projected shortfall is not a new situation, or even the worst that Social Security has faced. The system came within days of insolvency in the early 1980s. And there’s always the option of fixing it the way policymakers did then, by raising taxes or tinkering with benefits by, for example, raising the retirement age.In other words, Bush is stating that he wants to change the Social Security system now because if we don’t do it before the baby boom generation begins to retire, there is a problem because we are looking at having to raise taxes and/or cut benefits in the future. The authors of the Time magazine article are stating there is no problem because we can always raise taxes and/or cut benefits in the future. Both agree to the likely outcome of doing nothing until the problem manifests itself, the difference is that “There is No Crisis” mongers have put themselves in the unenviable position of (a) trying to demagogue any sort of benefit “cuts” while (b) stating that they don’t think that there is anything wrong with raising taxes and cutting benefits particularly since © under their proposal of doing nothing until the problem manifests itself, we would wind up having do more of both.
Thorley,
There is a difference between saying “there is no crisis” and saying that nothing should be done. There is a minor, long-term financing problem that should be addressed, and a vigorous debate about the best way to address it is all to the good. (I personally would favor removing the salary cap on the FICA tax, making it at least flat and not regressive, as it presently is.)
If you take the time to examine the arguments of those in the “there is no crisis” camp, you’ll see that the argument is actually something more like “There is no crisis that necessitates fundamentally transforming Social Security in order to ‘save’ it.” The point being that Social Security can continue to exist indefinitely in its present form with some minor adjustments.
This is miles away from the signals that are coming from the administration, which suggest that the ultimate objective is to transform SS into something other than what it is today.
And to top it all off, the proposals that Bush seems to be concocting do nothing to address the financing problem; if anything, they exacerbate it.
Not only is it insulting to hear them use democrat instead of Democratic, it is an intententional insult that angers me every time it is allowed to be used. I can’t believe that the “media” allows the bastardization of the word.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review