We’ve posted on this one before, but I’m a believer in the vital importance of audit. And it is troubling me somewhat that in carrying out my audit, I cannot find any news reports about atrocities committed by the Sadrists during their period of control of Najaf, which are dated later than 28 August, the day after the siege ended. Reports filed during the course of fast-moving events are often unreliable, and it strikes me as odd that there has been no follow-through at all on this story. Could anyone steer me in the direction of any more information, or is there some obvious reason I’m missing?
I found a couple:
Thanks very much. There’s a lot of weird, contradictory information here; it seems very much to me as if the court has been conflated with all sorts of atrocities committed as acts of indiscipline and/or local vendettas carried out by Sadr’s troops. If people were being tortured for suspicions of collaboration with coalition forces, then that’s obviously bad, but this would be something carried out by Sadr himself, not by a sharia court as such, since there’s no sharia law dictating that you have to knuckle under to thugs and freebooters. What search-words were you using; I really want to keep on top of this, because I think that an accurate understanding of Sadrism is going to hold a lot of the keys to the vexed “Islamism” question.
I’ve found one:http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040901-124008-3160r.htm
This article in the Washington Times from 1st September was based on a secret, and leaked, ‘US Army Intelligence report’. It’s been referred to elsewhere, eg in the Lebanese Daily Star, but I haven’t seen it picked up by any large papers or broadcasting organisations. (Yes, I do know the Moonies own the WT, no that does’t necessarily mean anything they print is lies.) I don’t quite know if it counts, since it was published after 28th August, but we don’t know when the intelligence report it was based on was compiled, and what subsequent intelligence reports have concluded.
I think it’s quite possible that Sadr did commit atrocities, but that there has been no follow-up because: a) the US military has decided to go with Sistani’s policy of coming to an ‘understanding with Sadr’ and leaving him alone as long as he doesn’t come out in open revolt- and publicising any murders he may have committed does rather conflict with this;
b) Western journalists aren’t going to Najaf to check because Najaf right now is a dangerous place to be a white-skinned foreigner.
On the other hand, maybe Sadr- at least in Najaf- didn’t commit atrocities, although we know he has a thuggish militia at his command. Two key paragraphs from the WT report:
‘The source said that while it appears certain that the bodies exist, the circumstances of when and where the people were killed, and by whom, remained unknown yesterday.
’ “We don’t have a complete picture of where they came from,” the officer said. “We’re trying to uncover what really happened before we are able to release information.” ‘
And Zeyad on ‘Healing Iraq’ (http://healingiraq.blogspot.com/ )thought the stories were credible and passed on rumours from a friend of his who was in Najaf at the time:
‘Bodies of mutilated and executed policemen were found in Sadr’s ‘legal court’, also the bodies of 4 women who were seriously disfigured. Our friend said that Abdul-Sattar Al-Bahadili, who was Sadr’s former representative in Basrah (the one who called for kidnappings of British female soldiers), was in charge of the court. He ordered summary executions and beat people with a rubber truncheon when they disobeyed his orders.
‘I will try to get the photos and post them here.’
Maybe Sadr committed atrocities and got away with it because he is now too big to touch; maybe he didn’t. But solid news seems hard to get hold of on this topic.
I’ve found one:http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20040901-124008-3160r.htm
This article in the Washington Times from 1st September was based on a secret, and leaked, ‘US Army Intelligence report’. It’s been referred to elsewhere, eg in the Lebanese Daily Star, but I haven’t seen it picked up by any large papers or broadcasting organisations. (Yes, I do know the Moonies own the WT, no that does’t necessarily mean anything they print is lies.) I don’t quite know if it counts, since it was published after 28th August, but we don’t know when the intelligence report it was based on was compiled, and what subsequent intelligence reports have concluded.
I think it’s quite possible that Sadr did commit atrocities, but that there has been no follow-up because: a) the US military has decided to go with Sistani’s policy of coming to an ‘understanding with Sadr’ and leaving him alone as long as he doesn’t come out in open revolt- and publicising any murders he may have committed does rather conflict with this;
b) Western journalists aren’t going to Najaf to check because Najaf right now is a dangerous place to be a white-skinned foreigner.
On the other hand, maybe Sadr- at least in Najaf- didn’t commit atrocities, although we know he has a thuggish militia at his command. Two key paragraphs from the WT report:
‘The source said that while it appears certain that the bodies exist, the circumstances of when and where the people were killed, and by whom, remained unknown yesterday.
’ “We don’t have a complete picture of where they came from,” the officer said. “We’re trying to uncover what really happened before we are able to release information.” ‘
And Zeyad on ‘Healing Iraq’ (http://healingiraq.blogspot.com/ )thought the stories were credible and passed on rumours from a friend of his who was in Najaf at the time:
‘Bodies of mutilated and executed policemen were found in Sadr’s ‘legal court’, also the bodies of 4 women who were seriously disfigured. Our friend said that Abdul-Sattar Al-Bahadili, who was Sadr’s former representative in Basrah (the one who called for kidnappings of British female soldiers), was in charge of the court. He ordered summary executions and beat people with a rubber truncheon when they disobeyed his orders.
‘I will try to get the photos and post them here.’
Maybe Sadr committed atrocities and got away with it because he is now too big to touch; maybe he didn’t. But solid news seems hard to get hold of on this topic.
Thanks Dan. In retrospect, the Najaf-is-too-dangerous thing ought to have been obvious to me. What I’m really interested in is the distinction between atrocities committed by Sadr in his capacity as a chancer, thug and wannabe warlord, and specifically Islamic atrocities. In other words, whether this “court” was a credible preview of the sort of sharia law that we might expect in Iraq if Sadr and gang were brought into the political process, or whether it was just Muqtada’s private star chamber. At the moment, the evidence seems to be slanting in the direction of the second.
For reasons why there haven’t been more enquiries into the atrocity allegations, I’d also add c)- Sistani’s nominees will now be running Najaf, and if Sistani wants to keep al-Sadr, whom he seems to despise, in the political process, he will discourage enquiry into Sadrist atrocities.
As for it being a sharia court or Muqtada’s private star chamber: if he’ll do whatever he can get away with and point to the Koran for justifcation. The distinction between Muqtada’s crime-oriented atrocities and his Islamically-motivated atrocities seems to me to be a distinction without a difference. The thugs currently marauding in the Darfur, like the thugs unleashed over the last decade in the southern Sudan, are both claiming to be ‘better’, ie more Wah’habi, Muslims than their victims and are looting their property. Who says virtue has to be its own reward?
For what it’s worth, Reuters (August 27) quoted a cleric who said it was a set-up:
“We denounce this charge. This government is very capable of trying to frame us. Those corpses are our fighters which we could not wash or move because the Iraqi government and Americans cut off the electricity and water,” he said.
“There is also one woman who was passing by the shrine and killed by a sniper. We can identify each and every body.”
I didn’t go for a fancy combination of search words but went to the newsnow feed , did a search on “Sadr” and then scrolled through looking for likely headlines.
There’ve been a few short reports included in the IWPR’s Iraqi Press Monitor. See the 09 Sep 04 edition here: http://www.iwpr.net/archive/ipm/ipm_153.html
Its interesting to note that accoriding to that report, the anti-Sadr marches in Najaf were in part to demand more information about the victims from Muqtada
I’m going to get flamed for saying this, but it seems like his civilian body count is lower than ours (the U.S. occupations). Of course, one needs to remember that all the civilians we killed while fighting him are actually his fault, because he provoked us — I get it, I get it.
“Sadr is a thug” “Sadr is a thug” “Sadr is a thug”
Repeat as necessary.
On to Iran!
Get Syria while the noise and heat of that obscure the front pages!
Egypt will fall without a shot!
Kingdom Come!
Ahmed tells how he and Sameer discovered a 15-year old boy who had been acting as a spy for the Americans. He had been carrying a GPS (global positioning system) device in his sleeve, marking the positions of all the Mahdi Army units in the neighborhood. Ahmed and Sameer chased the boy down, and handed him over to the Mahdi Army, knowing they would probably torture and kill him.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002008476_battleground18.html
And you choose to research the alleged atrocities committed by … the resistance fighters? Nice going, Daniel.
I recall that Agence France Press had a reporter throughout all this in the centre of Najaf - BBC was carrying quite a bit from him - so has anyone checked the francophone media?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review