Either Bob Somerby has invented a transcript out of whole cloth, or he has caught Vice-President Dick Cheney lying on tape.
CHENEY: John Kerry is, by National Journal ratings, the most liberal member of the United States Senate. Ted Kennedy is the more conservative of the two senators from Massachusetts.(LAUGHTER)
It’s true. All you got to do is go look at the ratings systems. And that captures a lot, I think, in terms of somebody’s philosophy. And it’s not based on one vote, or one year, it’s based on 20 years of service in the United States Senate. (emphasis added)
That’s not a matter of interpretation; that is a baldfaced lie. The National Journal ranking that Cheney is referring to is based on one year, 2003. Kerry and Edwards missed a lot of votes in 2003, because they were out campaigning. When the National Journal looked at their lifetime voting records, both Senators were in the middle of the Democratic pack. Here are the ten most liberal Democratic senators currently serving, according to the National Journal:
1. Mark Dayton, D-Minn. 2. Paul Sarbanes, D-Md.
3. Jack Reed, D-R.I.
4. Jon Corzine, D-N.J.
5. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.
6. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.
7. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa
8. Richard Durbin, D-Ill.
9. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.
10. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt
When Republicans say that Kerry was ranked as the most liberal Senator, that’s an extremely misleading claim, but it’s technically true (for one year, according to one publication). When Cheney said that the ranking applied for 20 years of Kerry’s service, that’s not even technically true.
It’s fun to see Jon Stewart humiliate Rep. Henry Bonilla on this issue (the video is on the right). It’s not nearly as fun to realize that Kerry’s opponents get away with it constantly in front of professional journalists.
P.S. Googlebomb for most liberal senator. Pass it on.
Actually, Kerry missed a lot of votes in 2003 because he was on a boat in Cambodia.
So, I am to take it that being ranked as the most ‘liberal’ Senator is now a bad thing in your eyes? If Kerry was mistakenly ranked as being the ‘strongest on security’ or as the ‘greatest war veteran’ (supposing such rankings existed) would Democrats be similarly incensed?
It seems odd to me that Democrats are embarrassed such charges, even if they are false.
John,
I ain’t that liberal. I didn’t support the most liberal candidate in the primaries. I would completely understand the concern that moderates would feel about voting for the most liberal Senator, if it was true. And I don’t appreciate Cheney lying.
It seems odd to me that Republicans are unembarassed by the fact that their Vice-Presidential candidate is lying in their faces.
Yeah, because Republicans keep brining this up and so it must be good for Kerry then. Trying to bursh the other side as out of the mainstream is known as a political attack.
Ted — nice post, just fix the recurring typo in your Howler posts, his name is Bob Somerby (no 2nd S in surname). He’s hilarious today too on Krugman vs O’Reilly.
The extra “S” is for extra-special. Which Bob is.
OK, fixed it.
1. For the Democrats, arguing about whether Kerry is or is not “the most liberal senator” or “more liberal than Ted Kennedy” is a real loser strategy, so don’t expect this issue to get into mainstream discourse.
2. Cheney is usually pretty careful about public statements like this, so either he uncharacteristically misspoke, or the transcript is wrong. But pushing the liar angle is a poor strategy: see point 1.
Gee, John James, that’s some comeback. Great explanation for why it’s okay for the Vice President to lie to our faces, yet again. I’m starting to believe that, at some level, right-wingers actually crave being lied to by macho men who will protect them from all the evil badness out there. Not that left-wingers are perfect human beings — far from it — but I’d love to see more psychological deconstructions of lefties vs. righties.
Cheney is usually pretty careful about public statements like this
Pardon? The same Cheney who repeatedly publicly says we don’t know whether Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks? And who said in 2004 that we had “conclusive evidence… that [Saddam] did in fact have programs for weapons of mass destruction.”
I am willing to believe that Cheney is careful in his public statements, but not that he is careful to ensure that his public statements are true.
I would say that Dick is careful not to say anything that can be easily proven untrue.
Yeah so what? So I lied. Does a bear shit in the woods? What difference does it make?
Oh yeah, before I forget,
Go fuck yourselves!
Somerby’s quote is accurate. The transcript is here, near the end:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/08/20040806-15.html
Is Kerry the “most liberal senator.” No. Is he “more liberal than Ted Kennedy.” Probably not. But do numerous groups rank him as very, very liberal? Why yes, they do.
So you may understand why right of center readers are tuning out the outrage expressed in this thread.
Cheers!
I’m sort of with John James on this: protesting that Kerry IS NOT the most liberal senator (even though he isn’t) concedes way too much to those who are attempting to marginalize mainstream liberal positions.
All Mark Dayton (elected in 2000, IIRC) probably did to earn the #1 spot was to try to hold the line against Bush’s irresponsible tax cuts and extremist judicial nominees. The right wants to dismantle the New Deal, and the people who stand in the way are the radicals? Come on.
There’s a historical record of liberal/conservative ranking backed up by a very solid mathematical model at Dr. Keith Poole’s voteview site. Here is the page on current rankings.
The rankings are based on roll-call votes, so a history of missing votes can influcence the ranking. Most liberal is Byrd and Kerry is in the middle of the Dems with the same score (24.5 rank) as Lieberman and several others.
What was interesting to me was the reason Kerry came out as most liberal in 2003. It was not because he changed his views and got more liberal on the issues he’d previously voted moderately on. It was because he showed up for such few votes that the ones he did vote on counted more, and those were the issues he’s most liberal on. What it does reveal is that his liberal-leaning views are the ones that most define him, since those are the ones he cared about enough to show up for. That he voted more moderately some years rather than others is more an accident of what issues there were to vote on than an indication of his priorities.
Another possibility is that, when you’re bound to miss a lot of votes, the ones you show up for will be close votes, where your vote matters, and those will be ones that divide on party lines. You could understand why Kerry would not show up for the 97-1 vote declaring National Kitten Day—his vote really doesn’t matter—but that will mean he doesn’t get counted as agreeing with Inhofe and Kyl on that one, whereas Dayton and Sarbanes do. (Dissenting, of course, is Frist.)
Mac, I respectfully disagree. I think the weapons of mass destruction programs quote was easily proved untrue, by for instance looking at the recently released Kay report.
Oops - I see my Matt beat me to the punch. (Great minds…?) But, anyway:
That Kerry is showing up for the votes on issues that have a higher priority for him is one possible explanation for his more liberal rating in the year where he missed many votes.
But there are others equally plausible. For instance, perhaps he quite sensibly puts a higher priority on being present for votes that are likely to be close, and a low priority on votes that (however important the issue) are likely to be very one-sided, anyway. In that case, what he would tend to miss are votes that have broad support from both parties — precisely the types of votes that would make one come out more moderate on such indexes.
One would need a lot more info than has been presented here before backing any such hypothesis.
I just meant “Matt” — there’s no salient sense I’m aware of in which he’s “my Matt.”
I am for sale, though, if your department is buying.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review