Via Randy Barnett, I see that John Lott isn’t the only disgraced gun researcher who likes playing dress-up on the internet. It looks like Michael Bellesiles has a sock puppet too. “Benny Smith” knows a lot of things that only Bellesiles would know. Bellesiles hasn’t admitted it, but having read the story, I can’t think of another explanation.
That’s really embarassing for Bellesiles. What’s more embarassing, though, is the way that Lott’s fiercest critics have continued to stick up for Bellesiles. Even after his work was debunked, Bellesiles is being promoted on a speaking tour by People for the American Way. Just this week, the editors of the American Prospect published a piece by him as if he was a trustworthy source. And of course, any respectable think tank would have fired him a long time ago, but he keeps hanging on at Brookings.
Sad, really.
UPDATE: (Irony hat off) Now that I think of it, what in the world is Bellesiles doing nowadays? I just realized that I have no idea, and googling didn’t help.
(Also, now that my hat is off, I should reiterate without irony that the story about Bellesiles does seem true, and it really is embarassing for him. Don’t want to be misinterpreted.)
That’s pretty rich.
I think you mean American Enterprise Institute, no. I’m sure Lott fits in well with other heavyweights there like Kevin “36,000 Dow” Hassett.
Saw somewhere that Beseilles was trying to “re-collect” his data and has a gonzo publisher lined up.
Sorry, but the whole of Barlow’s second paragraph reads like a parody of sock-puppetry. It is Bellesiles’s fiercest critics who have continued to stick up for Lott. It is Lott who is sponsored on a speaking tour, not by People for the American Way, but by the Federalist Society. It is Lott who is recently published by National Review Online, not The American Prospect. It is Lott who continues to hang out at a think tank, at the American Enterprise Institute, not at Brookings.
Ralph: why, exactly, are you sorry? Might it be because you failed to click on the links and in so doing get the rhetorical device that is being deployed?
Not casting stones, or anything, of course. I happened to initially read it without clicking on the links and got rather pissed at the People For The American Way et al. until I did so. All in all, a great paragraph.
Ted, I trust you’ll be monitoring the weblog world for the first blogger to breathlessly pass on the word that Bellesiles is being published in The American Prospect and toured by People for the American Way.
Eric, Cast all the stones you want and write it off to my being slow-witted. It is a great paragraph.
It’s amusing, I must admit, but the analogy ultimately fails. Lott’s wrongs, as real as they may be, are a molehill compared to Bellesiles’ mountain of fabrications. Aside from that Mary Rosh idiocy, Lott’s differences with his detractors’ conclusions are down in the noise. Literally, they’re comparable to the error band.
Bellesiles, on the other hand, was guilty of systematic fraud. Fabrication of sources, misrepresentation of them. His whole thesis was built on a foundation of lies, as was exposed long before he won his prizes and plaudits. Issued by people who didn’t much CARE, in as much as his work was useful. Emory barely touched on Bellesiles’ offenses, when they held their investigation.
So it’s entirely fair that Lott is diminished, but not gone from the scene, while Bellesiles is a disgraced non-entity. That’s the status both deserve.
Your glee over Lott’s problems is understandable, then, but it’s still the glee of creationists obsessing over Piltdown man. A trifle devoid of proportion…
Well except for Lott making his stuff up and changing his model and data mining, Brett is absolutely right it is only about Mary Rosh.
brett, I think the Dead Parrots blog detailed what lot did pretty well a while back. IIRC, he made claims about his data that were false, due to what initially seemed to be a data error. But then he quickly rejiggered, and for a while removed some of the data when this was pointed out. This is the statistical equivalent of historical fabrication. I don’t want to get into an argument about which is worse, but they seem pretty similar to me.
It never ceases to amaze me how cruel the virtuous can be. Lott’s crimes, and Bellesisles, apparently mean that they are forever banned from the discourse, and should be set out as beggars somewhere, eh? Because Bellesisles book failed and was finagled by the man in several respects, it makes sense that Emory fired him — but it would make no sense for American Prospect, if it took it into its editorial head to do so, shouldn’t hire him to write an article. The same is true with Lott, who, while certainly engaging in shenanigans with his data, has also presented a pretty powerful case for considering such factors in the gun debate as how to factor in the protective aspect of owning guns — which is surely not irrelevant to judging how guns are used in this country.
The quality of mercy, man. There is nothing more dystopian than a meritocratic utopia, where the scarlet “A”s are earned by the Great Headmaster, and “F”s get you sent off to the farm.
roger—
These aren’t mistakes but deliberate falsehoods. Since even referee’s usually don’t sit down and go through everything line by line (not that most of the work is refereed here) scholarship assumes that those doing the work while self interested are also honest. If they are proven to have comitted deliberate falsehoods, no one has the time to go through some very technical pieces to distiniguish if this time they are being honest and so in the interest of time and forward movement it behooves strong punishment for dishonesty.
Bloody hell, I didn’t expect it to happen in this very comment thread.
Hello! All-seeing omnipotent aliens! Take me now!
Ted,
“disgraced researcher”
John lott is not quite disgraced. Check this:
http://www.markarkleiman.com/archives/000997.html
Mary Rosh was Lott’s most determined online defender, posting many messages, almost all of them defending Lott and displaying close familiarity with Lott’s work. Benny Smith is Bellesiles’ most determined online defender, pos...
Read more at John Lott's Unethical Conduct
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review