The New York TImes has a horrific report on the extent of pollution in China and on the people who are bearing the costs of growth:
Less than a mile downstream from the waste outlet, Wang Haiqing watched his seven goats chew on weeds. Mr. Wang lived on the other side of the stream, in Wangguo, and said several neighbors had contracted cancer or other intestinal ailments. He said his goats vomited if they drank from the blackened water.
To reach clean drinking water, he said villagers must dig wells 130 feet deep. Most cannot afford to do so.
“It’s been so polluted by the MSG factory,” said Mr. Wang, 60. “It tastes metallic even after you boil it and skim the stuff off it. But it’s the only water we have to drink and to use for cooking.”
During discussions of trade agreements, it was predicted that free trade would allow polluters to move away from environmental protection laws. That possibility is now being used as a threat by industry when talking to state legislatures. There are also provisions in free trade agreements penalizing state and local attempts to exclude profucts produced by environmentally-destructive methods.
The right-wing free-trader argument is that pollution is a a tradeoff which the third world should be free to accept. And that “the third world t=cannot afford the luxury of environmentalism”, as if environmentalism was all about pretty photographs and such.
The right-wing free-traders also normally are hard-line on government “takings”, but here the government decision involved the “taking” of a villages’ health and part of its livelihood. The Chinese profitting here are different individuals than the ones suffering from the pollution. We’re not dealing with the unanimous collective solidarity of the People of the Third World or People of China.
It’s the liberal free-traders who have the hardest questions to answer. During the freetrade debate questions of this kind were simply brushed aside and ignored (well, some laughable nugatory provisions were written into the law).
In short, knowing what we know about the government of China and the workings of free trade, we should not be surprised by this and should not object either if we’re free traders. After all, the goat-herders chose to live downstream from the factory; to them it was a good choice, and the reason it seems that way to them is that they are not competitive on the market. They need to improve their skills and invest in some other enterprise.
The blowback to the USA of the partnership between corporate and government aristocrats and Chinese communist aristocrats is going to be VERY BAD.
Zizka, another argument made by us free-traders is that the most polluting companies in a third world nation tend to be local companies, not MNCs. You’ll note the factory in question was making MSG, not Doritos. While MNCs tend to pay less money in the third world than they do in the first world, their wages and working conditions tend to be better than native third world countries; PR in their home nation, and a better k-l ratio than most third-world domestics explains this.
(As an aside, I had “home grown” (one word) instead of “native” in my original post, and the board wouldn’t let me post because of questionable content - odd, huh?)
The problem with being a manufacturer in the US is that short term survival requires playing the China card (getting at least some things made there etc.)The only way to end this race to the bottom is internationally agreed upon government policies. Something we are not about to do with the current administration.
Not necessarily government policies. International environmental and labor standards (including minimum wage and the right to form a union) is, obviously a necessity. But there is no need for direct government involvement, some external organization (like WTO) should be able to monitor (by inspecting the factories) and enforce (by penalizing the offenders).
I think it’s pretty irrelevant what the company produced or who owned it. We have a pretty good indication of Chinese environmental conditions and environmental law there in the story. The story isn’t really about the MSG company per se.
cure: “I had “home grown” (one word) instead of “native” in my original post, and the board wouldn’t let me post because of questionable content - odd, huh?”
It was probably tagged as “drug-related” content.
Man, it would be so easy to throw off a joke about MSG poisoning Chinese people for a change. But I will resist the urge.
This kind of thing was part and parcel of what happened in the West during our rather painful transition to an industrialized society (our meaning westerners, not meaning me personally being there during the Industrial revolution). But it would be rather cheap of us to condemn the Chinese…they merely want the kind of life that most people in the West can have without much effort. The problem is to find ways to do where the Chinese can have the cake (industrial development) and eat it too (without having this kind of environmental devastation).
Andy Xie of Morgan Stanley offered some insights on this issue recently.
http://www.morganstanley.com/GEFdata/digests/20040901-wed.html#anchor2
His take is that while energy demand accompanied by high coal and steel prices are bringing wealth to Northern China, the labor surplus is keeping wages down and encouraging substitution of labor for capital. This results in lack of scale economies and thus heavy pollution coking factories. Modernization would cause unemployment pressure so local governments and their citizens are willing to tolerate the environmental costs. Xie opines that with all costs included (congestion, pollution, highway damage, etc.) there is probably negative value added.
He also notes that the export sector may be too capital intensive, reducing gains to labor. Additionally, the service linkage to Beijing is a drain from other surrounding areas, discouraging infrastructure investment.
It looks as though it will only get worse in the near future.
Abb1: we already have international labour standards - have had for decades. And guess which two sets of people both studiously ignore their existence and argue vehemently against them? That’s right - major economic players and politicians!
On its record, the WTO seems an unlikely enforcer. How about a bit more support, a bigger budget for the International Labour Organisation?
How about voters - in countries which have an element of democracy - questioning their potential leaders on this apect of their responsibility?
Well, the ILO, of course, has no power. And their standards are only recommendations.
What the ILO can do is to provide assistance to someone who does have real power, like WTO.
I agree that it’s not likely to happen without a major politician making a crusade out of it. I thought Howard Dean came kinda close to making it one of his rallying points last year when he was flying high in the polls.
“I had “home grown” (one word) instead of “native” in my original post, and the board wouldn’t let me post because of questionable content - odd, huh?”
Many filters filter out the word “socialist” because it contains the name of pharma-spammer “cialis” in it.
It took me a while to figure out why my political arguments were being filtered out for questionable content.
If this is such an issue, why did the Kyoto treaty exclude China from the restrictions faced by European countries?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review