It strikes me that there is no antonym for “exceed.”
lack
several others come to mind, too, but “lack” seems most to the point
Fall short. OK it’s two words, but did you specify one?
German has a nice word for mismanagemed: heruntergewirtschaftet.
Approach? Depends what you’re trying to say, I guess.
Thesaurus.com seems to think the antonyms for “exceed” are “be inferior”, “fail”, or “fall behind”. These may be literally close (as well as “lack”, mentioned above), but semantically this is a very good question.
I think a good argument can be made that there /are/ no semantic antonyms — words often have affective and social meanings on top of their literal ones. The purely literal route is to say the antonym of “exceed” is “not exceed”. Social and affective meanings, however, are not so easily negated. If the social meaning of a word such as “exceed” includes an understanding of the environment of the speaker, the analog word or phrase from any different environment may or may not exist. Likewise, an individual’s understanding of the affectations of a word may differ from another, making negation rather moot.
That is to say, if the definition of the word “exceed” to me includes the literal definition /plus/ expectations that the speaker has a reasonable mastry of English, and that the context the word is used it will be good, and so on — as more non-literal meanings are taken into account, the chances of a pure antonym existing diminish rapidly.
Of course, taking its roots, the syntactic antonyms might be “inceed” or “subceed”. Who says we can’t make up our own words? ;-)
Undershoot.
John Major
“misunderestimate”
What’s wrong with “fall short”?
If we talk about exceeding a target, then not exceed isn’t the antonym, since that includes meeting the target as well as falling short.
What’s wrong with “fall short”?
It’s certainly opposite in meaning, but it’s two words. I think if you have a word, its antonym should also be a single word. If English were like German, as jamesw points out, we could just have fallenbershorten and be done with it. But I want a single word, and I don’t think there is one.
It’s only folk lexicography that leads people to identify meanings with single words. I wouldn’t hesitate to call “to fall short of” a lexeme and list it in a dictionary. If a word is defined as the stuff between two spaces or punctuation marks, then it isn’t a word. But it need only be a lexeme to be an antonym, and I think it qualifies as that at least as well as “shortfall” does.
If English were like German, as jamesw points out, we could just have fallenbershorten and be done with it
Shortfallen, surely.
And remember that, in German, most (though not all) of these compound verbs are ‘separable’. That is, they’d be a single word in the infinitive and in the past participle (shortgefallen) but two in most uses (du fällst short, die Ergebnisse fielen short).
Jamesw’s example, BTW, is great. I suppose we’d translate herunterwirtschaften as ‘mismanage’, but the English lacks the German word’s image of not only managing badly, but achieving an undesrirbale result thereby.
If it’s expectations that are being exceeded, then the opposite is to disappoint them.
I’m sure back in Shakespeare’s day there were dozens of words which he could use as antonyms - depending on the context. There certainly isn’t one universal antonym suitable for all occasions. But why should there be?
E.g. X exceeded his duty, but Y ducked his.
X exceeded the bounds of propriety and good taste, but Y respected them.
X exceeded expectations, but Y disappointed them.
Bush
Thomas, I don’t think there is any modern usage of “to disappoint” with a non-cognitive direct object. You can only disappoint things that feel emotions.
Inceed
“inceed”—“The adminsitration’s performance inceeded all expectations—we misoverestimated them.
Lag.
Many, depending on context: tp suffice, to complete, to be inadequate, to be insufficient, to be deficient, to be undistinguished, to be left behind, surpassed, become inferior, to be less than, to maintain, to stand aside
trailed
Underachieve
“Undershoot”.
underperform
Word boundaries are kind of arbitrary. For example, “Jamesw” — one word or two?
Word boundaries are kind of arbitrary. For example, “no table” means the same thing as “notable.”
Glen gave the answer at 9:42, and theophylact resupplied at 5:01. What’s with all the jibber-jabber?
Suckceed
It seems that we are looking for the “??” in these analogies:
excess: deficency =
excessive: deficient =
exceed: ??.
It’s true that “excess”, like “deficiency”, normally has a negative tone, whereas “exceed” is more often positive, but I think the derivations are as I give them. “Defect” doesn’t work. “Deficited” is not idiomatic.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review