As a fellow prohibitionist I decided to send an email to Mr Hastert asking him either to assure me that he has turned over the evidence he has of Mr. Soros’s wrongdoings to the relevant authorities or, if there is no evidence, to withdraw his accusations as prominently as possible. I got this very odd message after I send my email:
Due to Congressional franking rules I cannot send a personal response to people outside the 14th District of Illinois. Your opinion is still important to me though and will be registered.
What on earth does this mean? The Speaker of the House is not allowed to correspond with people outside his district? Can this be right? I am not asking this frivolously, or to make a partisan point against the Speaker, since my experience of US electoral and campaigning laws is sufficient to know that it is labyinthine and bizarre in the extreme; incredible as it is I’m entirely willing to believe it. I ask so that some of the experts out there can explain what it means.
No he just doesn’t want to pony up for a stamp.
No, he just doesn’t want to pony up for a stamp.
No actual knowledge, but I’d imagine the franking privilege is limited so that Reps can’t flood the nation with free mail.
Now, for e-mail, that seems less plausible, tho I suppose there’s some minute cost to the taxpayers to sending e-mails ….
Trust me, defending the Hasterts of the world is against my instincts, but this one may very well be legit.
Franking is sending free postal mail — something that some congresspeople abused heavily not too long ago. That’s probably why it’s restricted. It’s still pretty disingenous — “We can’t respond for free, so we can’t respond.”
Just a guess. People from within his congressional district get a form letter generated based on the subject, and everyone else gets nothing.
“Franking” is the process whereby government officials send mail to citizens free of charge (no postage required). Due to widespread abuse of the system, reforms were put in place several years ago to limit this power. So while Hastert is free to send letters to whoever he wants, he has to pay the postage out-of-pocket.
Still, franking remains one of the most powerful weapons of incumbents as they fight off electoral challengers. Congressmen can send letters to their own constituents communicating what they’ve done and how many wonderful results have accrued, and the taxpayers foot the bill.
ummmmm…
he in fact did send you a personal response via email, just one devoid of value to the recipient.
Here’s the full dope:
http://www.house.gov/cha/body_redbook__html_.html
Hastert is full of it since you aren’t part of an unsolicited mass mailing, but asking for a solicited individual reply. It’s true that Hastert can’t mass mail (for free under the frank) outside his district, but this excuse is one of the lamest yet.
Hastert is flat out lying when he says he is forbidden to give you a “personal response”. He is forbidden to include you in a mass mailing 90 days before the election; a mass mailing is clearly all his office is willing to do for you.
Yeah, it’s probably legit. I get mailed replies to my emails to my Senators and my Representative, but just form emails from others. It makes sense.
I think politicians (or their lackeys) tend to send anything approaching substantive rather than pro forma replies by letter rather than by email, since the latter are easy to forge. So Harry you might try sending Hastert a letter with a stamped, self-addressed envelope enclosed and see whether he responds.
…and if you really want a response, try stuffing the envelope with cash.
Yeah, remember the familiar DC saying - Your money doesn’t buy you influence, but it does buy you access.
Is that a ringing endorsement of clean government or what.
Hastert is interested only in the opinions of those who are qualified to vote in his district and those who’ll send him money to support their favored legislation. His interest in the first group is limited to devising lies to get their vote and in the second group to how much they’ve got to spend. You don’t count.
I’ve long been aware that any Congressperson will almost never respond to letters from non-constituents - as fyreflye said, there’s just no reason for them to do so. I probably knew at some point that their ability to frank was also limited as to encourage that preferential treatment of constituents (not that recieving mass-mailings is really so great).
But I don’t see how email is legimately restricted by the same rules, given the points other people have made about the almost nonexistent costs to taxpayers. And as djs notes, Hastert’s auto-response clearly undermines his own reason for ignoring you. Which is not to say that his other reason isn’t still valid - seeing as you won’t be voting/contributing in any way that influences him anytime soon, he has no reason to expend time and energy giving you an actual reponse. He could at least have the decency to say so, though. I say, write back and call him on the lie.
Franking is still very much abused. The Congressman for NC-11 has been sending glossy ‘information brochures’, prepared and posted at taxpayer expense, to people in the district.
This is prohibited from 90 days before an election, and he’s very careful to stay just within the rules on self-promotion. But it’s earned lots of extremely pissed-off letters in the local paper.
MPs are not allowed, by convention, to respond to ‘constituent matters’ for people outside their constituency. However, Hastert is not speaking as ‘the member from Illinois’, but as Speaker of the House, which makes his excuse pure weaselry.
An enormous problem in Texas, though not here in DC, where (postage be damned!) congressional representation is too costly to provide to residents.
While the rules don’t prohibit Hastert from offering a direct reply to your (out of district) letter, in general Representatives and Senators don’t reply to anyone who is not their constituent. Instead, longstanding practice is that they forward your letter to your Representative (or Senator).
The reply you received was BS — a polite “get lost” letter.
I get franked and mailed responses to my emails & phone calls from my rep (Boehlart- R, NY), and long emailed responses from one of my senators (Clinton, D, NY), and no response whatsoever from my other senator (Schumer, D, NY). So responses seem to run the gamut. However, as an email response does not require franking, and you emailed and were sent an email back, and since one need only cut and paste the response that would be printed out and franked for his district (is it safe to assume that the Speaker’s office is not populated by aides and interns chained to Corona type writers and mimeograph machines?) the response is totally bogus. The ‘expense’ of sending the email was already laid out when the “we’re not responding to you” response was sent. While reps and senators may not normally reply to non-constituents, the correct response would have then been to say “I will forward your concerns to your representative,” rather than “I don’t feel like answering you so I will make up a bullshit excuse.”
Hastert is too cheap to send a 37-cent stamped letter, and franking doesn’t apply to email. Unless— he has received and believed that email hoax regarding a proposed five-cent tax on email messages.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review