I’m a fan of rules and regulations. But they should be designed so that, if there is a strong case for doing that they are basically designed to prevent, someone who pushes hard enough will succeed in doing it. Here are two stunning stories of people being prevented from working in the state (i.e. public) schools in the UK, because, although one of them has run a well-regarded private school, and the other has pursued a successful career as a professor of physics (a shortage subject), they are not properly qualified. I can see reasons for the regulation, and I do think it unfortunate that the Telegraph gave evidence in favour of Mr Jones-Parry that told us a great deal about the kinds of children whose parents can pay £15,204 a year on their schooling, and nothing at all about his abilities as a school leader. But this is hilarious:
“The silly thing is that I have people from industry who are training to be teachers at Westminster. I have to sign them off to say that they are suitable. I suppose I could sign myself off.”
(Hat Tip: Michael Otsuka)
I don’t think it is any different in the US. The problem with education has never struck me as qualified instructors. That would seem to be just about the last thing needing fixed. All that money and energy going into certification would seem much better spent on parent education and parent involvement. The parent’s attitude towards their child education certainly seems to be the most important factor.
But what do I know, I get all my information by osmosis from my much better educated wife.
I think you mean “state schools”. “Public schools” in the UK are private schools. (Yes, really.)
robin — Corrected. But it’s now completely standard, at least in scholarly debate and discussions among policymakers to use ‘public’ to mean ‘state’. (I am English btw — ultra-English according to my co-conspirator Bertram). I’ve just spent the afternoon teaching about the contrast between the UK and US syustems, hence the US-leaning usage.
I rarely read things that begin “I’m a fan of rules and regulations” but certainly education is one of the places where it’s needed.
On the subject of bureaucratic requirements for teaching, you might be amused by my sister’s story about teaching English in France.
The issue pops up in the US with some frequency, driven by the teacher’s unions bashers, and I’ve never quite understood why I’m supposed to be outraged. There is generally a solution, just as here Mr. Jones-Parry could serve as an unqualified teacher while he becomes certified. That’s not the same as saying he’s “not good enough to teach”. It’s the same as saying “even an F-1 driver has to have a valid license to drive on city streets.”
My wife is a public school teacher. The demands are a bit more than simple competence in her own field. She has to know what medications each of her students is prescribed and be able to identify signs of trouble. She has to know all categories of learning disability and be able to diagnose potential problems. She’s part psychologist and part family counsellor, and complies with myriad state and federal mandates. That sort of ability does not come automatically with an advanced math degree, and private schools can handle them however they see fit. The state has a genuine interest in making sure those skills are learned before it certifies teachers.
Doghouse Riley, I think the first linked article says that he couldn’t be hired as an unqualified teacher unless they couldn’t find a qualified one.
However, this is all pretty irrelevant, as it sounds like this is all being very much overblown. Check the end of the BBC article:Instead of having to complete the usual one-year PGCE course, people with suitable skills could be assessed on an individual basis, a TTA spokeswoman said. This could be done in as little as a day.So in other words, they could just show up for an interview and become ‘qualified.’ Am I reading this wrong?
The most charitable explanation would be that bureaucracy makes even this unreasonably hard for someone who is a qualified teacher. But even in this case, the problem can be fixed without changing the rules and regulations. Does anyone know whether the BBC is really reporting this accurately?
Some replies to Doghouse Riley’s post:
(1) I agree that Mr Jones-Parry’s experience teaching high-achievers in a posh private school will not have equipped him to deal with many of the things he’ll encounter in a state school. A sensible way to deal with this is to create a conversion course for those with experience as teachers in private schools rather than to make them go through the same year-long certification process which is appropriate for those with no prior teaching experience.
(2) I agree that “even an F-1 driver has to have a valid license”. But it doesn’t follow that an F-1 driver should be required to take a basic practical driving test in order to obtain this licence. (The written test on rules of the road is a different matter.)
(3) Whether or not you would insist that an F-1 driver take the practical test, surely you don’t believe that the Physics professor should be required to pass a math exam for 16-year-olds in order to be certified as a teacher. Do you?
(4) In case anyone confuses Harry’s post for union-bashing, I should mention that it’s the Department for Education and Skills rather than teachers’ unions which is the source of these UK instances of bureaucratic inflexibility.
In answer to Neil’s question about the accuracy of the BBC’s reporting: As far as I can tell, there is a sensible fast track route to certification. But bureaucrats and ministers weren’t aware of this and insisted that the headmaster and the professor needed to complete the one-year certification course or pass the high school math exam in order to teach in state schools. It was only after people went to the media that the bureaucrats and ministers realized that they had been misrepresenting their own rules and regulations.
Yes, one of the stories quotes David Hart (the leader of the Head’s union) as being outraged. There’s nothing here bashing the unions, who are all extremely frustrated with the level of bureacracy at DfES, and lead the opposition to it.
But, doghouse, did your wife learn the things she needs to know in a teacher certification program? If so, I’m amazed, and would like to know which one she went to, so I can recommend it to people. The numerouss teachers I know learned all those things on the job. Its true that the UK equivalent of US teacher certification does a better job of preparing teachers for real experience, and is shorter, though.
neil asks
So in other words, they could just show up for an interview and become ‘qualified.’ Am I reading this wrong?
Yes — you have to produce a whole portfolio which shows that something in your education and work experience is equivalent to a PGCE. This is not so easy — and most applications of this kind are rejected even if you can figure out how to apply (which, at least when I had experience with it 3 years ago, was pretty hard). SO Michael, despite his outrage, is being generous to the DfES.
No-one has commented on the pig-headedness of a Physics Professor not being willing to take GCSE maths. I don’t have much sympathy with the particular person here, but can you imagine a bureaucracy that will not take a PhD in Physics and years of teaching in Physics in lieu of GCSE math? Even after someone asks them to? If he had taken GCSE math at 16 and everything else in his life was exactly the same he would qualify. This is just silly.
No-one has commented on the pig-headedness of a Physics Professor not being willing to take GCSE maths.
Perhaps he’s read Ionesco’s The Lacuna.
I know this will sound curmudgeonly, but Doghouse’s story seems to me to indicate problems with the schools’ division of labor, not the teachers’ qualifications.
I mean, why on earth should an ordinary schoolteacher have to know anything about medications or be able to diagnose learning disabilities? Don’t they have specialists for those things?
As doghouse says, private schools can handle those things however they see fit. Good for the private schools. Bad for the state education bureaucrats who make teachers wear a million hats.
Michael: I meant to suggest that we don’t shape licensing laws to suit the occasional expert who may find the process beneath him. The system seems flexible enough in the main; if Jones-Parry is exceptional someone ought to make that decision, but holding his case up as an example of bureacracy gone mad—and ignoring the other factors involved in teacher licensing—is over the top.
Nicholas: The reason teachers have to know about medications is safety. There are students who have to take meds at particular times, and that classroom teacher is in loco parentis. The teacher has to recognize any signs of trouble from under-or-overdosing. My wife has had two medical emergencies related to medications in her classroom in the past two years. As for learning disabilities, yes, there are experts to whom children are referred, but it’s the classroom teacher who sees their work every day and is the first line of defense. Public schools in the US are required to place children with learning disabilities in mainstream classes as much as possible, so every teacher must be qualified to handle them. Private schools can simply reject students at will and avoid the problem altogether.
doghouse riley — that’s all well and good, and were I to teach in a public (US) school, I would consider it necessary to take courses in child/adolescent psych, state education law (unfortunately), etc. Teaching younger people does require some different skill sets than teaching adults. However, I don’t really see that I need any instruction in lesson planning, creating interesting projects, and the myriad of other courses required by education departments across the US in lieu of expertise in a subject.
When I was younger, the norm for 7-12 teachers, at least, was to have a discipline-degree, plus a teaching credential to qualify to teach. That’s still true in some states, but the majority now require a degree in education and two or three courses in the specialty area. In practice, this means that a high school history teacher can be qualified in his subject (‘cause it’s often something called ‘Social Studies’) one class in history, one in government, and one in psych. This person would be given preference over the person with grad work in History — a person who also will have taken more courses specifically in the social sciences, as well as in the humanities and hard sciences!
I looked into this at one point, and was told that I would need to go back to school and get an M. Ed. at my own expense, including year of supervised teaching, but that it would not be worth my while, because schools don’t generally like to hire PhDs, since they cost more according to the union contracts and also tended to cause a lot of resentment among senior faculty without advanced degrees. Feh.
The Economist ran this story in its latest edition, 15 October, 2004, and perhaps the two cases have been blown out of proportion.
According to the Economist, in the first instance of the head maths teacher from Westminister, he could receive his qualifications in a day if an inspector came to assess him.
In the case of the PhD Physics professor, his qualifications in physics exempts him from having to take his GCSEs.
It appears that it is more a case of the maths and physics teachers not having been properly informed of the exemptions that could apply to them, and moreso do to with the form letters that are usually sent out by bureaucratic administrators regarding qualified teacher status.
The Economist ran this story in its latest edition, 15 October, 2004, and perhaps the two cases have been blown out of proportion.
According to the Economist, in the first instance of the head maths teacher from Westminister, he could receive his qualifications in a day if an inspector came to assess him.
In the case of the PhD Physics professor, his qualifications in physics exempts him from having to take his GCSEs.
It appears that it is more a case of the maths and physics teachers not having been properly informed of the exemptions that could apply to them, and moreso do to with the form letters that are usually sent out by bureaucratic administrators regarding qualified teacher status.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review