Thank you from the bottom of my heart to the traders on the Iowa Electronic Markets, who, on the last day of the campaign, have bid Kerry up to 51% chance of winning. Thus ensuring that, whoever wins, I will have ample material to spend the next four years teasing James Surowiecki about the “Wisdom of Panicky Crowds”.
(the really interesting thing is that the single most probable IEM outcome is still Bush to win with less than 52% of the popular vote. The big move of the bids has been from Bush>52 to Kerry >52!)
So what, exactly, is the predictive power of these online markets? This is like the Iowa Primary results, which showed a strong Dean lead up until the day before the election, when it became clear that his poll numbers were collapsing.
Looks like these electronic markets simply follow the news and the polls and regurgitate the conventional wisdom. Where’s the value in that?
fmguru: If the electronic markets did that, it would have value, since they would be summarizing all that disparate information in one handy number. On the other hand, I doubt that the electronic markets actually do that (although Iowa should be right about Kerry).
Panicky, or suddenly realizing that there’s no more time left to find a greater fool? It’s probably a mix of both.
In any case, that Kerry number is a little fishy, because the bid-ask spread is absurdly large — I don’t think there was any real liquidity there at the end, and there was probably some attempt to manipulate the market in a pro-Kerry direction. (The last trades in all four contracts add up to a total of 1.02, which is a mathematical impossibility.)
I’ve always thought the average price was a more reasonable reflection of the market’s verdict. It has Kerry’s chances of winning at 50.2% and Bush’s chances at 50%. Really going out on a limb there.
Anyway, I think the more interesting IEM market is the vote-share market, since even though it’s traditionally a lot smaller and less liquid than the WTA market, there at least we know definitively how accurate (or not) the market was. (Its historical performance has also been very good.) Last trade has Kerry getting 51% of the two-party popular vote, Bush 49%. (Average price has Kerry at 50.6%, Bush at 48.7%.)
I’d agree with James on this one; I think that the WTA market has regularly been all over the place, particularly with respect to the VS market.
It’s important that we record this, btw, as neither the closing graph nor the historical data file for IEM will record the astonishing intraday volatility I’m seeing (other than through the High and Low of today’s trade). The Kerry contract has oscillated between 46 and 51 in front of my eyes, while the spread has been all over the place. Meanwhile, the Bush contracts have stayed fairly flat. I really think it would be an improvement to IEM if they didn’t dividen up the liquidity pool and just had an “INCUMBENT” contract.
I agree with Daniel about recording this — the WTA prices are jumping all over the place. (Even the Bush prices have been moving recently — I think at 8:45 EDT the two Bush contracts added up to something like 54%, even as Kerry was at 52%.)
Absolutely right, too, that dividing up the liquidity pool into four contracts was not a good idea, and that there should probably be only be one INCUMBENT contract. If you’re trying to predict a single-event outcome, it probably works best when you only have a contract in that outcome.
Not absurd. If you’re expecting record turnout (which I’m not, though ca. 57% would be unsurprising), then one of two things is happening:
(1) The Democratic base is out in force, abetted by all the people who ask themselves “are you better off than four years ago” and those who have friends/family/relatives attempting their second or third “retirement” from the Armed Forces, and Kerry will dominate, or
(2) Karl Rove really is a genius, James Cavaziel and Curt Schilling are major boosts, “the four million” who failed to vote because of the DUI in 2000 will be out in force, and the voter “challenges” will go well, so Bush wins the popular vote in a landslide.
Turnout well over 50% of the electorate implies the people are making a clear choice—not a time for middling bets.
But that would imply that the two >52% contracts would be doing well, and they’re not; the action is just switching around from a high probability of a narrow Kerry win to a low probability.
IEM’s platform suffers from the inability to see the ‘stack’ of pending bids and offers. Often the best bid/last print represent a single contract. FWIW, the much deeper Tradesports voteshare/WTA market has had Bush ahead consistently with less volatility than the IEM WTA equivalent. The intermarket arb has at times been as wide as 7 or 8 cents (even greater in the Senate contracts.)
Don’t know if anyone caught wind of this when it happened, but a couple of weeks ago a single individual sold $100,000 worth of Bush contracts down to 10 cents on Tradesports (whereupon it very quickly recovered to 55 cents.) Very odd.
By the way tradesports has Bush victory bid at 55.
Slate’s just put out a bunch of early exit polls with Kerry leading Ohio and Florida 50-49. Given that Dems usually do better as the day goes on (it sez ‘ere), that ought to put a few cats among the pigeons … Kerr currently at 52, with the central <52 quotes at 33.4 for Kerry and 34.2 for Bush … this isn’t a market, it’s a fucking dartboard.
Coo, CT readers could have made a bit of money there … Kerry now quoted @ 57-60, and KERR<52 is 36 to BUSH<52 at 27.
Consumer alert, by the way; tradesports is just simply not responding, which I would imagine would be a bit of an annoyance if you had bought Bush @ 56.
pfffft … and there goes IEM too.
There’s probably a microstructure paper in this; you have to make allowances for the fact that you won’t be able to rely on trading out of your position as witching hour comes round.
Here’s the current IEM:
Contract BestBid
DEM04_G52 0.234
DEM04_L52 0.395
REP04_L52 0.186
REP04_G52 0.071
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review