From the Guardian’s profile today of Tory Shadow Home Secretary Oliver Letwin:
On his extensive office bookshelves there are enough volumes of Socrates … to suggest he is someone who thinks about politics using rare quantities of abstract nouns.
Shome mishtake surely? (Thanks to John Kozak in comments to an item below for the heads-up.)
I can’t believe that a journalist on Norman Geras’s dnoc could possibly be that uneducated.
They were all Highlights videos from Brazilian soccer games of the late 70s and early 80s.
I’m trying really hard, but I cannot figure out what that’s supposed to say.
I get it! It’s irony. ‘Enough volumes of Socrates to suggest’ - which would be zero, right? Geddit?
No, nor do I, but some people do irony better than others. Socrates for instance.
I was not aware that there WERE any volumes “by” Socrates. Are not all of Socrates’s utterances known to us only through volumes by Plato?
Socrates is also quoted extensively in Xenophon’s Memorabilia and is a character in Aristophanes’s The Clouds.
Oh crap, I just googled that and most of the returns are for a book by Leo Strauss.
I would guess it goes something like: “The spacing of the chapters in the Memorabilia clearly indicates Socrates would have agreed with everything I believe.”
Am I the only one who is completely in the dark as to the point here?
“Am I the only one who is completely in the dark as to the point here?”
Socrates didn’t write anything, befuddled, any more than Jesus did.
Ah - I suppose I see then. I think that I took “volumes of Socrates” to mean something other than “Socrates’s volumes”, perhaps “volumes regarding Socrates”.
Perchance we’re being spoofed? Within the ellipse in Chris’ quote, found in the original piece in the Guardian is this tidbit “and Aristotle and American social theory”. That is, while we may believe that Socrates wrote nothing, can we equally believe that there are no works of American social theory? Just the opposite, in my opinion, there are far too many.
But the discussion brings about two other minor issues – not generally worth discussion since they are, for the most part too obvious, and too insignificant – but that in this context seem to shed some light on the prior discussion on global warming (or lack thereof).
First, we do not KNOW that Socrates did not write anything. We accept that as fact in the absence of any works of Socrates to prove the opposite (opinion of third parties aside). In the same vein, Jesus may have written much, albeit under a pen name (or quill name if you will). Poetry, humor, plays, music. It’s all possible, but since we have seen none of it, or at least none under his name, we state Jesus did not write. That may be fact. It may not be reality.
That’s one of the fundamental differences between fact and reality. Reality is hard. Facts, on the other hand are pretty easy.
The second point is that we’re all too willing to accept statements of others as “fact”. Not to say that Chris was in any way lying, spoofing or misrepresenting the Guardian piece (whoops, I did use the word “spoof” in my opener, didn’t I. Sorry Chris). Just that the reference to volumes of Socrates in itself is humorous – based on fact. Yet, the discussion goes on without any concern for the original work or the text replaced by an ellipse. Simply put, we’re engaged in discussion of a discussion, not of the original quote, or its meaning.
What does all of this have to do with the prior piece on global warming? Simple. If S1 represents a state of the world misrepresented by those who want us to believe that global warming is real, and S2 represents a state misrepresented by those who want us to believe that global warming is a fantasy, and an event E occurs that is both consistent with S1 and with S2 but is more likely to be associated with the spin created by the S1 believers than the S2 believers, who, then, is better at fooling us? The S1 people or the S2 people? After all, they both have facts, and they both have those who will discuss their opinions at length.
Just like we have here.
I wonder what Socrates would have written about that?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review