Three stories I heard on NPR on the way to Daycare which made me want to drop myself off there and play for the day while sending my baby daughter off to the office instead:
Whoa - Kieran has a baby daughter? Where have I been?
As appalled and angry as I get, at the failure of so many parents to show basic, practical, everyday concern for their children’s upbringing—being involved in their schoolwork, policing the media they are exposed to, taking exercise with them, giving them chores, etc.—it can’t compare to the frustration I feel at those parents who view their children’s needs, problems and decisions as issues which warrant drug-induced solutions. Obviously this is a senstive subject, and just as obviously anti-depressant drugs have done wonders to improve the lives of many. But still: anyone who claims that the parents in this NPR report, like thousands of other parents, aren’t motivated at least to a small degree by a (frankly, in my view, self-centered) concern for making their and their child’s life “easy” is fooling themselves. Such pharmacological solutions can deny responsibility, challenge, and experience. It is frightening to me (though not surprising, given how cash-strapped schools are and how much power and influence are on the side of wealthy drug companies and their political allies) how quick many teachers and school administrators are to recommend to parents anti-depressants and other drugs, thereby simply encouraging a lazy sensibility already rampant among a certain set of paranoid and overprotective American parents.
No doubt someone with reams of medical data will disagree with me. But in my experience as a parent, 4 times out of 5 the drugged-up kid you see doesn’t really need it; she just needs time and attention. Unhappiness and stress rarely lead to murderous and suicidal rampages. Sometimes they lead to growth.
Rant off.
Whoa - Kieran has a baby daughter?
Yeah, that’s pretty much how I reacted as well.
I find it frightening and not a little unbelievable that a debate with Bush on any subject would be a rough ride. I can well imagine debating Bush on the subject of himself and feeling pretty confident.
What can one say in the face of such belief?
Sunday morning I watched (on TV) John Hagee of the Cornerstone Church, San Antonio, preach to an audience of several hundred, at least, that Iraq was merely an amuse bouche* for the coming Rapture. According to Hagee, when the Rapture comes, the Raptured—and he specifically dis-included the ACLU—will find themselves wearing white gowns and one of 7 different kinds of crowns distinguishing the rank of each Heavenly n00bie. The audience looked perfectly normal and absolutely certain of what they were hearing. 21st century religious wars. How is that even possible?
(*Hagee didn’t, of course, use the phrase “amuse bouche.”)
What’s worse about Keiran’s drug story is that it made it sound as if the kid’s depression was triggered by a move from the city to the surburbs (not by her school). It sounded to me like parents refraining from taking responsibility for their own decisions. But that may be a bit hard-hearted.
“No doubt someone with reams of medical data will disagree with me. But in my experience as a parent, 4 times out of 5 the drugged-up kid you see doesn’t really need it; she just needs time and attention. Unhappiness and stress rarely lead to murderous and suicidal rampages. Sometimes they lead to growth.”
In my view, the reasoning above is an example of the following fallacy:
Slothful Induction
Definition:
The proper conclusion of an inductive argument is denied
despite the evidence to the contrary.
Examples:
(i) Hugo has had twelve accidents n the last six months, yet
he insists that it is just a coincidence and not his fault.
(Inductively, the evidence is overwhelming that it is his fault.
This example borrowed from Barker, p. 189)
(ii) Poll after poll shows that the N.D.P will win fewer than
ten seats in Parliament. Yet the party leader insists that the
party is doing much better than the polls suggest. (The N.D.P.
in fact got nine seats.)
Proof: [how to refute the fallacious argument]
About all you can do in such a case is to point to the strength
of the inference.
http://www.datanation.com/fallacies/sloth.htm
Hugo has had twelve accidents n the last six months, yet
he insists that it is just a coincidence and not his fault.
(Inductively, the evidence is overwhelming that it is his fault.
This example borrowed from Barker, p. 189)
I dunno. What if Hugo is working in a meat packing plant?
Or if Hugo’s parents won’t take him off a drug whose side effects include incontinence?
His father quietly explains how the war in Iraq is a “spiritual war” and that people “need to just dig into their Bible and read about it — it’s predicted, it’s predestined.”
Last time I checked, Christianity wasn’t a suicide cult.
His father quietly explains how the war in Iraq is a “spiritual war” and that people “need to just dig into their Bible and read about it — it’s predicted, it’s predestined.”
I was amazed to hear him react this way too, and a little frightened. Somehow people belive that this war will lead to peace.
Somehow people belive that this war will lead to peace.
Er …. no. My impression when I listened to this was that this war was a step on the way to Armageddon. Enter Apocalypse, stage right. YOu know, these seemed like such nice people, and yet, it struck me again how much we Americans allow religious ideology to act as a substitute for a decent background in history and politics. It also struck me that there seems to be a real inconsistency between OT interpretation (creation with no allegory, thus no evolution) vs. a blithe willingness to interpret the NT (generally Revelations) as a direct allegory to our own times.
On the Zoloft story: Damn! All of what people alredy said, plus Damn! again. What are people thinking? Is it any surprise that behavior problems (or problematic behavior) is on the rise when we’ve just about removed all art and music (and PE, for that matter — another perfectly healthy outlet for self expression) from our schools? What would happen if we took the huge amounts of money spent drugging our children and instead spent it on schools — bringing back education in the arts, home ec, shop, PE, etc., as well as smaller class sizes and more teacher-time per child?
In my day, parents were completely oblivious to how their decisions, bad or otherwise, affected their children’s emotional lives; and walking to school, uphill, both directions, metaphorically speaking, was how we angst-ridden and angry teens navigated our way to adulthood. Clearly, these are crappy parents. The world is going to hell in a handbasket, I tells ya’.
“YOu know, these seemed like such nice people, and yet, it struck me again how much we Americans allow religious ideology to act as a substitute for a decent background in history and politics.”
Don’t your Zoloft comments subordinate science to ideology?
What disturbed me about the Zoloft story was the apparent complete lack of scientific or clinical ideas about when and how to take teens off SRIs. I know better than to demonize these drugs because I know the tremendous good they can do for people, but isn’t that something that should be looked into a bit more carefully?
He says his son understood he had to go to Iraq because “our current President is a very devout Christian … [who] had the knowledge, and understood what was going on, and it’s far deeper than we as a people will every really know, because we don’t get the information that the President gets.”
I thought human cloning was banned in the US. And yet the Brave New World has, apparently, arrived. What gives?
Don’t your Zoloft comments subordinate science to ideology?
As far as I can tell, no. ADM is noting that behavior problems rose when schools cut back on art/music/PE. According to your canons of inference, it’s not likely that that’s a coincidence. As a friend in college said, “When 40% of the class has been diagnosed with ADD, maybe it’s a social problem rather than a personal one.”
There may be some research that casts doubt on ADM’s thesis, but nobody’s brought it up here.
What can one say in the face of such belief?
people get teh government they deserve?
and although there are mixed results, meta analysis has shown the ssri class is marginally effective, or not at all, over and above placebo, at least in the adolescent cohort. (I read about it in science and nature anyway)
coupled with massive over- and -mis prescriptions by GP doctors who aren’t exactly qualified to make mental health determinations means it’s pretty easy to get a (free) 6 month supply, even if he or she isn’t one of those idiots who hand out inhaler and antibiotics prescriptions like they’re candy.
The President is simply unworthy of the trust these people have placed in him.
Any president is unworthy of the level of trust you describe. The scary thing about Isenberg’s comments is their utter incomprehension of political structure, their cession of all critical thought. This isn’t a Bush problem, this is a voter problem.
There are probably more traits in common that go unremarked-on among the ADD/SRI “cohort”. I’m guessing intelligence, skepticism, inchoate hunger for the uncontrolled and new…
Swirling in all this near-random info is the odd thing, when you think about it, that government decree removes children from most homes for most of the day and then inoculates them with “facts” that are only commonly accepted because the community itself was inoculated with them in childhood. (…a brief aside to salute the valiant minorities working to enlighten that process…and a passing mention of the equally interesting, economic-necessity-driven granting of commercial corporate access to that captive audience of children) Then, in that context, the behaviorally unfit and unwilling are drugged into submission, strike that, the brain-chemistry-challenged are chemically readjusted back into the flock, the herd, whatever.
Some of us were saying watch out for those fundamentalists back when the more comfortable intellectuals were content with sneering and ridicule, because who would take that nonsense seriously?
Well lo and behold.
It doesn’t matter you know, about the morality of it, they will write their own morality to fit their situation, the way people always have. It was a life and death struggle, from the get, it never was anything less, or more. Nonsense, especially “spiritual” nonsense, is like Zoloft that way, it adjusts the working mind, erases anxiety, allows the subject to ignore unpleasant truth, and promotes the acceptance of consensus reality.
“Our God is a mighty God!”
It doesn’t matter whether He contradicts Himself, or any of those trivial “logical” complaints. Bush is a great example of what I mean. He’s deluded, hypocritical, rivaling Vlad the Impaler for heartless cruelty and blood-guilt, and he runs the world, literally runs the world; inasmuch as any public figure could, he does.
It doesn’t matter that he’s bizarrely disconnected from his actions and their consequences in a moral sense, he does the work of the spirit. The spirit doesn’t care about right and wrong anymore than a virus does, or a termite hive. It doesn’t matter, and it never did.
It only matters that He wins.
Kerry is getting tired? Where is Dr. Max Jacobson when we need him?
Thanks, Matt —
Tom, what Matt said. I wasn’t really that explicit, though. Also, I was speaking as a parent and as a teaching person and also as someone who has done a lot of reading on SSRIs and how much research seems to have been either bypassed or ignored in bringing them to market.
people get the government they deserve?
And if the Rapture fundies were the only ones who got that government, that would be fine, leaving aside the pesky problem of nuclear weapons in the hands of religious fanatics who look forward to Armageddon and think I’m a lesser species because I don’t.
However, I and a lot of others are also getting the government that the Rapture fundies deserve.
I’ve stopped listening to NPR all together now. That’s after 30 years of listening, and giving, to it. Your post only reminded me why I chose to do so.
The Zoloft story is just depressing, if not maddening (I’m lucky I had better parents than that!) The Kerry story is INTENDED to depress Democrats. The Fundie piece…well, perhaps that’s ol’ Mr. Ahmanson’s influence further flexing it’s muscles.
So, after a few years of routinely feeling increasingly insulted, depressed and outraged AT NPR’S ever worsening “reportage,” I’ve gone cold turkey, and no longer need the Zoloft!
Dude, no need to worry. Let’s just take up a collection and buy Kerry some Red Bull (I would link to it, but it has really annoying audio I can’t turn off)! And on the other point, I think medicating yourself for head problems is completely stupi…. DOH!
‘people get the government they deserve?’
we’ll be finding that out again very soon wont we?
I too think the Kerry story is meant to sucker listeners.
Wait until you have a young teenager writing stories about suicide and self-mutilation, and see if you don’t try just about anything that might work to make your child better, starting with therapy and ending with anti-depressants. And one year later, my teenager was happy and well.
“Wait until you have a young teenager writing stories about suicide and self-mutilation”
[…]
“And one year later, my teenager was happy and well.”
post hoc ergo prompter hoc. i agree with the sentiment, tho im not sure the risk/benefit analysis would work out with current information. i don’t know, which is why it’s important to consult an expert about the side effect and outcome stats for similar patients against the potential positive effect.
It is becoming increasingly apparent to me that all 5 of my grandchildren will probably be educated in private schools. I am a believer in public education, and tried really hard to put my children there, but after a while we realized that it just wasn’t working, and sort of eased out of it. Parents who are really concerned, like my children now that they are parents, would rather put their time, energy and money into real schools, with art, music, PE and libraries than fight the uphill battle with the public schools.
With all due respect to those quoted below:
“Wait until you have a young teenager writing stories about suicide and self-mutilation, and see if you don’t try just about anything that might work to make your child better, starting with therapy and ending with anti-depressants. And one year later, my teenager was happy and well.
“post hoc ergo propter hoc. i agree with the sentiment, tho im not sure the risk/benefit analysis would work out with current information.”
In my opinion, the argument above (in italics) isn’t based on the “post hoc ergo propter hoc” fallacy. The arguments below, almost entirely, are so based:
“On the Zoloft story: Damn! All of what people alredy said, plus Damn! again. What are people thinking? Is it any surprise that behavior problems (or problematic behavior) is on the rise when we’ve just about removed all art and music (and PE, for that matter — another perfectly healthy outlet for self expression) from our schools? What would happen if we took the huge amounts of money spent drugging our children and instead spent it on schools — bringing back education in the arts, home ec, shop, PE, etc., as well as smaller class sizes and more teacher-time per child?”
“ADM is noting that behavior problems rose when schools cut back on art/music/PE. According to your canons of inference, it’s not likely that that’s a coincidence. As a friend in college said, “When 40% of the class has been diagnosed with ADD, maybe it’s a social problem rather than a personal one. There may be some research that casts doubt on ADM’s thesis, but nobody’s brought it up here.”
——————-
“i don’t know, which is why it’s important to consult an expert about the side effect and outcome stats for similar patients against the potential positive effect.”
I agree, and I don’t read anon’s post as arguing to the contrary. The following statement, however, appears to dismiss in advance any expert judgement, in favor of personal, lay observation and opinion:
“No doubt someone with reams of medical data will disagree with me. But in my experience as a parent, 4 times out of 5 the drugged-up kid you see doesn’t really need it; she just needs time and attention. Unhappiness and stress rarely lead to murderous and suicidal rampages. Sometimes they lead to growth.”
My kids go to public school, and they have PE and art and music. But I live in CT (that’s Connecticut, not Crooked Timber), where thus far we have managed to stave off the anti-civilization crowd who would rather have $15 bucks more a week in their paycheck than have a high quality public school, with well-paid and mostly really terrific teachers.
Tom, with all due respect, you’ll get more of a hearing if you begin by actually presenting arguments rather than offering one-liners accusing people of committing fallacies. Your comment in response to ADM was extremely rude, and you didn’t supply a jot of evidence in support of it.
In fact, what it seemed to do was imply that the connection between changes in school funding and behavior problems isn’t even worth studying, which is every bit as fallacious as anything anyone else has said on the board. Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a fallacy, but it doesn’t mean that correlations aren’t worth looking into.
Now, maybe someone has debunked the correlation, but I certainly don’t learn that from anything you say. Still, if you’re interested in discussion, you could start by being less condescending.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review