Does anyone know who was John Rawls’s PhD dissertation advisor? This question came up in discussion around here (a propos of nothing much at all) and no one knew, but I imagine at least one reader, if not a fellow Timberite, will know.
And to think that anyome might wonder if this is an academic blog!
I dunno. I do know that he spent the summer after he got his PhD doing the index for Walter Kaufmann’s Nietzsche, so maybe it was Kaufmann. If you care to look it up somewhere, the title was “A Study In The Grounds of Ethical Knowledge: Considered With Reference to Judgments on the Moral Worth of Character” which is notable for having been transformed into a journal article that contains zero footnotes or other citations.
Here’s something:
“A Study in the Grounds of Ethical Knowledge: Considered with Reference to Judgments on the Moral Worth of Character.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Princeton University, 1950. Abstract in Disserta tion Abstracts (1955), 15(4):608-609.
http://sun3.lib.uci.edu/~scctr/philosophy/rawls.html
Proquest digital dissertations only sells it in hardcopy. If all else fails you can ask J.B. Schneewind:
“J.B. Schneewind, philosopher and historian, tells of arriving at Princeton as a student and observing Rawls defend his doctoral dissertation. Such an ordeal can be a friendly ceremony, a rite of passage, or a blood bath exacted by barbarous professors. The young Rawls turned it into an erudite lesson by citing to the professors passages from Kant—in German!”
Rawls’s dissertation supervisor was Walter Stace. At least, that’s what Thomas Pogge says in an essay called “A Brief Sketch of Rawls’s Life,” reprinted in Richardson and Weithman, The Philosophy of Rawls: Development and Main Outlines of Rawls’s Theory of Justice (Garland, 1999). Apparently, Rawls also worked with Norman Malcolm and Max Black (author of that wonderful book, The Prevelance of Humbug and other essays).
I sent an e-mail inquiry to Ann Getson, a contact person at the Phil. Dept.
Maybe she’ll send a reply. I’ll let you know.
Much thanks for all the quick feedback!
Is it just me or is that a really bad title? He must have gotten some big time assistance before coming up with A Theory of Justice.
Eh, even A Theory of Justice is pretty blah. Rawls has nothing on Hobbes and Nietzsche.
:-) I always think of A Theory of Justice being the Old Testament (Political Liberalism the New), so I don’t expect it to have a snappy, clever title.
Stace, best known for a book on mysticism. Kaufmann, stuck with trying to convince everyone that Nietzsche and Hegel weren’t Nazis or Commies. Surtprising, really.
Classics
The Virtual Tophet
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (theology)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Amity Wilczek (biology)
Theodore Wong
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Irascible Professor
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review