The July issue of the Journal of Philosophy has a paper by Frank Arntzenius built around a few puzzles about rationality, probability and belief, roughly in the tradition of the ones Chris and Brian posted recently and which attracted so much commentary. One of Arntzenius’s puzzles concerns a glitch in how a Bayesian agent ought to update her degrees of belief in x under a particular kind of uncertainty. But never mind about that. The example is about waiting for a reprieve on Death Row and is set up in the following way:
You are to be executed tomorrow. You have made a last minute appeal to President George W. Bush for clemency. Since Dick Cheney is in the hospital and cannot be consulted, George W. will decide by flipping a coin.
Cheap, but funny. It suggests a topic: philosophical importance of U.S. Presidents. Bill Clinton is finding his way mainly into examples in the philosophy of language (“It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is”). Also possibly ethics courses. Bush Sr doesn’t seem to have have left much in the way of a philosophical legacy. Dubya is a binomial estimator.
“Dubya is a binomial estimator.”
I do believe you mean a Bernoulli estimator; the coin flip is a one-shot deal, not a repeated series, so there are only two outcomes,
The point is taken. Sorry to be so picky.
And given the historical record, of course, monomial estimator is probably more accurate. (Depending naturally on meanings of “is” “estimator” and “accurate.”)
When I was studying counterfactuals and causation we had a lot of examples related to the 2000 election. Not as fascinating as Professor Paul’s “neuron diagrams” or whatever, but a wee bit more accessible.
We wants puzzle! Nasty Kieran give it to us or else…
I think philosophers find “It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is” much less funny than the general population. IIRC Frege’s first contribution to his dialogue with Punjer on existence is “What is the meaning of ‘is’?”
Anyway, when I clicked on the link to Arntzenius’s homepage, I found this sentence:
“I am writing a book on time”
which I’m sure will please Arntzenius’s publishers—but I’d like to know what the book is about.
I always wondered why Clinton’s questioner didn’t respond to the “what is ‘is’” answer with: “Is - as in “your testimony ‘is’ evasive”.
I can’t remember the exact exchange, but I think if the questioner had followed Sean’s advice, Clinton could easily have said that their question made no sense. IIRC, the ‘is’ in question was an ‘is’ of existence. If you try and define it using the ‘is’ of predication, as Sean does, there are likely to be complications. Of course, even once we get past the existence/predication divide, there’s the issue about whether a particular ‘is’ is temporally loaded, which is what Clinton was (quite properly, if clumsily) drawing attention to in his response. As far as Sean’s suggestion goes, it suggests that it was meant as a present tense ‘is’, which might (but only might!) have suggested that Clinton could say that there is no relationship.
Matt’s right - philosophers don’t find this stuff funny beacuse we find it much too complicated to laugh about.
Don’t remember the exact exchange either, but have the sense that it was less a question of being and not-being than of present versus past. If the inquisitor were placing his questions in the present tense and the affair was in the past, then Clinton could truthfully answer differently than if the inquisitor were placing his questions in the past tense.
lots of stuff
Matt’s right - philosophers don’t find this stuff funny beacuse we find it much too complicated to laugh about.
Heh…that’s why I stopped taking philosophy after that intro class. Econ (and everything else, really) is much simpler.
Believe me, the real Dubya would find a way to kill you. It’s not like he does not enjoy it either. He holds the US record for executions by a governor, no one in modern history comes even close, @153. And as a ‘fair or impartial’ estimator of things, need I remind anyone of FL. 2000, where he managed to make ~180K votes ‘disappear’ or remain uncounted to claim the Presidency based on a majority of 537 ‘votes’, and the ascent of our Supreme Court. Not a good estimator, if one wanted an ‘impartial’ one on either side, right?
Clinton’s case was not helped by the terribly complex manner in which ‘sex’ was defined by the lawyers questioning him. There is indeed massive amounts of commentary on it, but much of it would easily favor Clinton on this point. The non violent, legal, consensual, adult affair never actually involved intercourse, and had ended long before the interrogation of that day. Something the lawyers just did not seem to be able to grasp. Clinton truthfully answered the questions put to him, and of course was never found guilty of anything. He was never even formally charged by anyone of any real crime. Believe it or not. Of course this screws up all the nice little analogies that can be made from the case, real history often is messy that way.
Clinton was not equivocating on the predicative/existential use of “to be”. But discussions on ontology of time do indeed use Clinton’s presentism in a more convincing manner (see for instance Mark Hinchliff, “A Defense of Presentism in a Relativistic Setting”, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67, Supplement).
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review