Jack Balkin on the Pickering appointment.
I don’t have much of a problem with Bush appointing judges he believes in to recess appointments. Presidents should appoint the best people possible to the federal judiciary. My problem, rather, is that the fact that Bush believes so strongly in Pickering says something deeply troubling about Bush’s politics.
What, like he really believes in them (his politics)?
Welcome to the future Theocratic States of Amerika…
I’m left wondering if Balkin is just now figuring out that there’s a whole bunch of stuff about Bush’s politics that are way more than deeply troubling. Or maybe he’s doing some ultra-sophisticated understatement thing and making it look like he’s just now figuring out that there’s a whole bunch of stuff about Bush’s politics that are way more than deeply troubling. I dunno.
I don’t have much of a problem with Bush appointing judges he believes in to recess appointments. Presidents should appoint the best people possible to the federal judiciary.
In this case the nominee in question had a unanimous “well qualified rating” from the ABA and a lower-than-average (both nationally and within his circuit) rate of reversal - which is considered the “gold standard” for judicial nominees.
I suppose we can look on the bright side - he didn’t appoint Judge Roy Moore.
Thanks, Thorley, for parroting the Republican talking points. Yet another example of how this administration thinks that “advise and consent” means “rubber-stamp.” They see governing the way that Microsoft sees market share: 90% is not enough. When Republicans say they are not democrats, well, they’re finally telling the truth.
Perhaps Pickering was the only one who was willing to take a recess appointment. I read somewhere that he’ll be eligible for retirement in January 2005 when the recess appointment runs out. He may well feel that there’s no way he’s going to get a real appointment, that therefore he should retire in a year, and it’s better to retire from the higher court.
Other potential nominees may not have been willing for their careers to end in January 2005.
As I explained at more length on my site, Pickering was probably chosen for this recess appointment mostly because he had such strong support in the Senate. That makes Bush’s infringing on Senate prerogatives less of an issue.
The vote to end the filibuster drew 53 votes, so Pickering would almost certainly have been confirmed had he gotten a vote.
The slander about Pickering’s career during the fight was particularly nasty, but something we have come to expect, particularly from the left.
Jam’s point that Pickering’s age had something to do with his recess appointment is probably correct, too.
Out of all the questionable, worrying or troublesome cases to come before Pickering’s court, out of all the possibly unjust outcomes of mandatory sentencing guidelines, the people he made his strongest push to help were cross burners.
He went all out to bend the law, intervened with the executive, got lawyers who practice in his court to write the Justice Department, and who did he choose to help? Who were the people Pickering thought most deserving of his judicial activism?
Cross burners.
And when does the current president choose to elevate a man who’s gone to great lengths to help these cross burners?
The Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend.
Anyone out there still wondering why Americans just don’t trust Republicans on race relations? Anyone?
Doug Merrill wrote:
Thanks, Thorley, for parroting the Republican talking points.
In this case the definition of “Republican talking points” appears to be “discussing the nominee’s actual qualifications” rather than engaging in petty character assassination.
Yet another example of how this administration thinks that “advise and consent” means “rubber-stamp.”
In this case, it means “actually let the nominee come to the floor for an up or down vote.”
Out of all the questionable, worrying or troublesome cases to come before Pickering’s court, out of all the possibly unjust outcomes of mandatory sentencing guidelines, the people he made his strongest push to help were cross burners.
Actually, a better question in the Swan case is why did the Clinton Justice Department cut a deal to let the ringleader plead to a misdemeanor after he had already fired a gun into the home of the couple in question?
I am pretty much agnostic on mandatory minimum sentences (although I am generally opposed to the creation of a federal criminal code) but Doug Merrill is (unfortunately as usual) misrepresenting the facts when suggests that Judge Pickering had singled out cross-burners. According to the Village Voice (click on my name for the link to the article):
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, realizing that Pickering’s “judicial reputation hangs almost entirely on one explosive case”—the cross-burning case—decided to extensively review that case and the rest of Pickering’s judicial record.As reporter Bill Rankin wrote in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution on March 9, that paper concluded that
“Pickering—like many other federal judges who face rigid U.S. sentencing rules—has gone out of his way many times [as he did in the cross-burning case] to reduce prison sentences in cases where he thought the result would be unreasonable. And many of the defendants who benefited are black.”
The March 9 article by Rankin also noted that before being nominated to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by the president:
Pickering, “in a 1999 essay on race relations in the Jackson Clarion-Ledger, addressed racial bias in the courts, empathizing with black, not white, concerns. He counseled whites who were angry about the recent acquittal of a black murder suspect to look at the justice system from a black perspective.
“While Mississippians may not realize that African-Americans are treated differently by the system,” Pickering wrote, “it is the truth and a most disturbing one if you are black.”
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution added that “as a judge, Pickering has thrown out only two jury verdicts, both times because he felt the verdicts were biased against minority plaintiffs.”
Based on this it would appear that Judge Pickering seems to be have questions about mandatory minimum sentences (as do many federal justices across the political spectrum) in general.
Oh and just a reminder, Judge Pickering also has a unanimous “well qualified” rating from the ABA (their highest rating) and a reversal rate of about 0.5% (one of the lowest in both the nation and in his circuit) which is the “Gold Standard” for judicial nominees.
But as Doug established earlier, talking about a nominee’s actual qualifications (“Republican talking points”) has not been the goal of the Pickering opponents. Since they cannot touch him on those, they instead have to resort to character assassination.
Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review