While we’re on the subject of slurs from Republican hack politicians, you all may remember Tom DeLay’s claim a couple of months ago that John Kerry did indeed have the support of foreign leaders - such as Kim Jong-Il. NKZone, your one and only one-stop-shop for North Korea related news, begs to differ. Apparently, a North Korean spokesman has recently done an interview warning that Kerry’s call for CVID,1 and pressures from Democrats for military action mean that a Kerry administration would lead to heightened military tensions. He suggests that North Korea would respond to increased pressure from Kerry by test-firing ICBMs into the high seas close to prominent American cities, and test-detonating a H-Bomb. I’m not a qualified North-Korea tea-leaf reader by any stretch of the imagination, so I don’t want to speculate too much on the source and meaning of this. Still, on its face, it certainly appears to give the lie to Republican claims that North Korea would prefer a Democratic administration.
1 i.e. Complete, Verifiable Irreversible Dismantlement of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal.
Maybe this is an opening for Nader.
So we can rest assured that if Kerry wins it won’t make North Korea happy but will instead induce it to fire ICBMs near prominent U.S. cities. This is a great selling point. I think Kerry should make it a focus of his campaign.
The claim by folks in/around/standing near the administration that the dictator with the best dictator style (shazam on that hair and those leisure suits big boy!) is pro-Kerry is round two. As I recall, round one was that Osama is pro-Kerry because he’s “scared” of Dubya. The response to this by folks in/around/standing near the Kerry camp was that Osama wants Dubya to win, because he is a terrorist recruting tool wet dream. I’m sure round three will rehash the Kerry flub of declaring that “other world leaders want me for prez” (whence some of this sprang, I’m sure) with the Dubya camp declaring that the French want Kerry (borne out by recent articles in le Monde), and we all know what commiepinkos the French are, so if you don’t vote for Dubya you, too, are a commiepinkoterrorist. And you get your money, like George Soros, from trade in narcotics.
In the meantime, until we extend the American franchise to the North Koreans/Taliban/Al Qaeda/the French, I’m going to stick to worrying about Ohio.
What makes you assume that North Korea doesn’t want to test fire ICBM’s?
My explanation of the facts provided is that North Korea would be afraid to fire near US cities when President Bush is reelected.
Since CVID is the position of both candidates, it is tough to make a choice between them on that basis.
John, North Korea sure hasn’t felt afraid to move forward aggressively with their plutonium reprocessing program with Bush in office the first time.*
I’d make a lot of facetious remarks about how silly it is to base our choice on what the North Koreans want—like, “Nat, aren’t you appeasing evildoers?”—but I don’t think this is funny at all. Bush’s head-in-sand policy toward North Korea not-a-crisis was the best way policy to increase the chance that a million Americans will die in an atomic bomb blast sometime. My brother is about to move to Washington, and I don’t find this amusing at all.
Seymour Hersh and Fred Kaplan have had more on Bush’s bungling.
(Oh, and if that interview’s been reported correctly I think North Korea’s just talking smack. I’m not an expert but I haven’t seen anyone suggest that they’re close to being able to develop an H-bomb as opposed to an A-bomb.)
*Plutonium reprocessing is much scarier than uranium enrichment, which was what was going on before Bush assumed office. See the first two paragraphs of the Kaplan article on the difference.
Matt, I’d peg the best chance of a whole bunch of Americans getting some ‘instant sunshine’ in the next couple of decades on terrorists getting their hands on nuclear weapons. The most likely source being the (countries of) the former USSR. The Nunn-Lugar program attempted to deal with that problem; Bush, of course, cut the funding (I guess because it addressed a real terrorist threat, and not something more politically useful).
Matt Weiner wrote: “I’d make a lot of facetious remarks about how silly it is to base our choice on what the North Koreans want—like, “Nat, aren’t you appeasing evildoers?”—but I don’t think this is funny at all.”
(1) I’m glad to see that you’ve mastered the art of paralipsis.
(2) Who are these evildoers I’m supposed to have appeased? My engineering math students?
“Bush’s head-in-sand policy toward North Korea not-a-crisis was the best way policy to increase the chance that a million Americans will die in an atomic bomb blast sometime.”
Would you have supported unilateral pre-emptive military action to prevent North Korea from acquiring the makings of nuclear bombs?
“My brother is about to move to Washington, and I don’t find this amusing at all.”
Don’t you miss the good old days when it was “We’ll all go together when we go . . .”?
that political tactic (FUD) has nothing to do with evidence. once you get into an argument over whether kim jong il is a supporter of john kerry… well, you’ve already lost. and they’re saying it louder and more often elsewhere, in strains, versions, variations resistant to your original counter-argument.
Kerry might not let the “Rev.” Moon sell/give North Korea any more nuclear subs.
If you’re the owner of the Washington Times that means you’re feted at the Capitol rather than dragged to Gitmo.
Nat—The appeasement remark was meant to evoke a parody of the line of thought that goes, “The last thing we should ever do is something that will make the terrorists/evildoers happy”—as you point out “it won’t make North Korea happy but will instead induce it to fire ICBMs near prominent U.S. cities” is not a great selling point. Except I meant to say it in a facetious way that made it clear that I didn’t think there was anything wrong with your comment.
But since you ask if I would have supported preemptive military nuclear action against N. Korea—no, I don’t think that would’ve been a good idea. As far as I can tell the least bad course of action would’ve been to make some concessions to N. Korea in return for keeping the plutonium locked up (which it was; again, there’s a difference between plutonium and uranium). Not a good choice, but we’ve already settled that sometimes you have to do what the evildoers want. Pretending there was no problem was a dumb move.
And I don’t miss the days when it was “We will all go together,” really.
Barry—
N. Korea strikes me as a country that is likely to sell off nukes, but I ain’t an international security expert.
Um, the interviewee is Kim Myong Chol, the self-described “unofficial” spokesman for the DPRK. He’s a Korean expatriate living in Japan, with no particular connection to the Kim regime. He’s also a bit of a whack-job.
Grain of salt, people.
“Barry—
N. Korea strikes me as a country that is likely to sell off nukes, but I ain’t an international security expert.”
Posted by Matt Weiner
It’s a worry, but the retaliation part applies (if a nuke goes off in a US city, N. Korea is in deep, deep trouble). Terrorists and post-soviet criminals, however, are less constrained.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review