Further to my comments last week on this subject, an update on Mr Wolfensohn’s progress toward the holy grail of Rights Based Lending. As of yesterday, China has a “winning formula” that the rest of the world ought to copy, while Israel can go screw itself. Something for everyone here, I think.
(The second of those two links is, IMO, disgraceful. Lord knows I’m not exactly a fan of the actions of the State of Israel in the territory it has annexed, but where the heck does Wolfensohn get off deciding to have a Middle East policy? Note that his comments appear to have no relevance to the action project involved; the Gaza Palestinians are just going to be made to wait for their new houses because of Wolfensohn’s amour propre, “as a Jew”. OTOH, it looks like he flip-flopped again shortly after that Ma’ariv interview and the discussions are still live after all. Lord, what a clown show)
Wolfensohn said that Israeli requests will receive a negative response. Not Palestinian requests (or requests on their behalf).
So how do you infer that the Gaza Palestinians are just going to be made to wait for their new houses because of Wolfensohn’s amour propre, “as a Jew”.?
And, yes, the World Bank needs a Middle East policy. For example a proposal to build a Gaza harbour would be an excellent investment except for the fact that as long as the occupation continues it will need the consent of the Israeli’s. To evaluate any project in Gaza you’ll need a policy regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict. One could say that that policy should be developed by its constituents instead of Mr. Wolfensohn personally. But then Mr. Wolfensohn never said his personal opinion determines the policy of the WB.
Wolfensohn said that Israeli requests will receive a negative response. Not Palestinian requests (or requests on their behalf
Our survey said:
“Wolfensohn added that he met Ministry of Finance minister, Meir Sheetrit, last week in Washington. The two discussed Israel’s disengagement plan, and Sheetrit asked for World Bank assistance to build new towns, as well as assistance in the economic development of the Gaza Strip in order to reduce the unemployment levels in the region.
Wolfensohn said that World Bank experts are currently reviewing the proposal submitted to them by Minister Sheetrit. However, he noted that in the current mood Israel should not expect any positive response from the World Bank.”
Daniel,
These short newsitems need to be interpreted. Even if you take them literally, it is more likely that it means something else then you suggest.
Part of one of the discussed disengagement plans was that the WB would buy the settlements in Gaza and that Israel would use that money to build homes in the Negev.
As the quote you give doesn’t say where the houses are built, it could refer to this plan. Unlikely though.
Just as unlikely that Israel would formally propose to take responsibility for building houses for Palestinians in the Gaza strip, when at the same time they claim that that is the responsibility of the PA.
What is likely is that these talk were about politics. Israel want to have the final say about what happens in the Gaza, but can’t say that formally, and publicly it cannot say it is opposed to aid to the Palestinians. But the WB is in the same bind, because they can send all the money to Gaza they want, but if Israel opposes it it won’t have any effect, because Israel still has (and will maintain after the removal of the settlements) , a strict control on what happens on the ground.
What Mr. Sheetrit likely asked for was thus not a proposal of Israel asking for money for the Palestinians, but that the WB would take up certain proposals of Palestinians (or etc.) and coordinate that with Israel.
From your second link:
Wolfensohn and Sheetrit agreed that the Palestinian aid committee will arrive in Israel and will hold meetings here so as to coordinate the aid package with Israel, before a final decision is made in Washington.
There is no suggestion in this article whatsoever that there is a proposal from the Israeli’s to build homes in Gaza.
This leaves your interpretation of the Maariv article, that Wolfensohn would turn down a proposal to build homes in Gaza, a bit outside of (my) reality.
Luc, I have no control over your reality, but a number of facts about this proposal are settled. The money is being proposed to fund the construction of a new industrial zone in Gaza, a new desalinisation plant, a power plant and social funding for Palestinians.
This is similar to the well-intentioned idealism of a former World Bank director, the lovely Robert McNamara. Probably wanting to absolve his guilt from the Vietnam atrocities, he tried to help the underdevelopped world through the Bank, but ended up causing prehaps more destruction than he did as SecDef.
Whatever good social goals they staple to their manifesto, it’s always the bankers and investors that make the final calls.
Luc, I have no control over your reality, but a number of facts about this proposal are settled. The money is being proposed to fund the construction of a new industrial zone in Gaza, a new desalinisation plant, a power plant and social funding for Palestinians.
The WB could easily say “screw you” to Israel and continue with those projects. Except of course for the practical reasons i’ve mentioned.
Essentially those “proposals” are an Israeli view on how WB aid to Gaza should be spend.
To get a better view of the sequence of events leading to that Israeli “proposal”:
Israeli gov’t to study World Bank report on Gaza disengagement
Quoting myself:
So how do you infer that the Gaza Palestinians are just going to be made to wait for their new houses because of Wolfensohn’s amour propre, “as a Jew”.?
And as a beside, those proposals are highly political. The first disengagement plan contained a suggestion that the Erez industrial zone could be transferred to the PA.
The industrial zone from the “proposal” is intended as a replacement for the Erez industrial zone.
He suggested that the World Bank fund the establishment of a Palestinian industrial zone in place of the Erez industrial zone, which will close
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/430145.html
Given that the disengagement plan changes almost daily now, I think the WB would be wise to draw its own conclusions instead of honouring the Israeli “proposal”.
As for the “settled facts” of the proposal, which according to Daniel included a new industrial zone to replace Erez, the new disengagement plan has the following to say (according to haaretz)
A third change relates to the future of the Erez industrial zone, which employed 4,000 Palestinians before a series of terror attacks inside the zone. The original disengagement plan promised that Israel would discuss the future of the industrial zone - again with the proviso that an international body ensure that security demands were met. Now, the plan states that the area will be handed over to the Palestinians or an international body, implying that the Israeli businesses operating in the industrial zone will be closed down.
No new industrial zone then?
The clown show is wholly yours Daniel. And not the World Bank’s or Mr. Wolfensohn’s.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review