When I am President, those people who think they are so clever and such savvy travelers for using the parents’ room instead of the regular bathroom — because it’s quieter and cleaner and they read about this handy trick in a “Travel Tips” column once, even though they do not have, say, an unhappy five-month-old in their arms who needs a change and a feed — had better watch out. I will have the Justice Department and a team of Military Lawyers by my side, together with a bag of bamboo splinters, a Leatherman Crunch, a Camping Stove and a copy of the Constitution of the United States for kindling. And who would stop me? For one thing, a War on Irritating Frequent Flyers would command widespread popular support, and I would be willing to consider opening New Fronts in this war, e.g., on People Who Cut Me Off In Traffic, or Bloggers Who Do Not Link To My Posts. Besides, in the words of President George W. Bush, “I am the commander, see? I do not need to explain why I say things. — That’s the interesting thing about being the President. — Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don’t feel like I owe anybody an explanation.”1
1 Previously thought to be mere managerial bravado but subsequently discovered by Administration lawyers to be a valid constitutional argument licensing the use of torture against unspecified numbers of persons.
I think the most surprising thing about all this is that I wake up each morning and Bush is still President. Don’t we get to say “ollie-ollie-ox-in-free” by now or something?
I dunno, something about ‘our long national nightmare’ or something, I guess…
What’s “the parents’s room”? For a minute I thought you had guests who were going to the bathroom in your bedroom, or showering in there or something, rather than in the main bathroom, but I suppose you mean something on a plane- I’ve never seen it, or noticed it. I guess I’m not really a frequent flyer, though, more of an occasional one. Please do let me in on the story. (Then again, those w/ a 5-month old in need of a change and a feed on a plane often fall in to the irritating traveler category, too, especially when the wailing starts.)
Almost as clever as the women who read in some savvy magazine that they should squat above the toilet seat so that their precious haunches don’t touch the icky plastic, thereby spraying the entire thing with urine.
George W. Bush is loathsome, and he’s got to go. But I don’t think the opponents of Bush should stoop to the low road, so well travelled by the right, and take quotes out of context. I followed the link to Bush’s quote, and the context makes it less offensive. He’s merely saying that in the context of a meeting with his staff, he sometimes makes comments intending to be deliberately provocative, and in those situations he doesn’t believe he needs to tell people that that is what he is doing. And I might be willing to concede that point to him (although I have doubts about whether he is smart enough to know when he is being deliberately provocative).
This is a quote that I have heard before, and thought it pretty damning. Now that I see it in context, however, it doesn’t seem so. When those opposed to Bush use these out-of-context quotes to put Bush down, it just opens us up to accusations of misleading people. And as we well know, the SCLM is much more willing to point it out when the left commits this offense than when the right does it. There are so many more legitimate criticisms of Bush that we can make, there’s no need to resort to this type of quotation.
KIERAN: I will have the Justice Department and a team of Military Lawyers by my side, together with a bag of bamboo splinters, a Leatherman Crunch, a Camping Stove and a copy of the Constitution of the United States for kindling. And who would stop me?
No one. Not if you were a Republican, that is. Mainly, that is because, few would know. The press would not tell anyone. You quoted Bush from Woodward’s Bush at War. Coincidentally, I also remarked on those words earlier today (here and here) on how his statement relates to the torture memo. When Woodward’s book was released that quote did appear in print and online in a few outlets. But think about it. This was the President of the United States talking, asserting that he doesn’t “owe anybody an explanation.” These are words we might expect from a dictator. From someone who expects his actions to be unquestioned. From someone who would think himself free to do anything, including torture. Why weren’t such telling words of the president in the headlines across the country? Why wasn’t his claim of absolute power the lead story on all the networks? As a president, Bush is a failure, to be sure. But it is the media which have enabled him, thus betraying their duty to inform the people and our privilege (and theirs) to be free.
He’s merely saying that in the context of a meeting with his staff, he sometimes makes comments intending to be deliberately provocative, and in those situations he doesn’t believe he needs to tell people that that is what he is doing.
So he picked the one of the worst parts of “The West Wing” to emulate?
He’s merely saying that in the context of a meeting with his staff, he sometimes makes comments intending to be deliberately provocative, and in those situations he doesn’t believe he needs to tell people that that is what he is doing.
Pseud, that’s the point of the footnote, and the joke: Previously thought to be an offhand comment about confrontational management style within the Whitehouse, now elevated by Adminstration lawyers to a bit of constitutional interpretation designed to legitimate torture. We’ve come a long way in the last two and a half years.
And, as you say, the full context for the original comment is linked to in my post. So what’s not to like?
Sorry, I missed the footnote (an unhealthy aversion to small print, perhaps?). My bad.
You’re little joy ride with hysterics has already happened. A man named Hussein and his charming sons have already tried it. It doesn’t work. No matter how much you try to make bad guys out of the good guys, you and your impressionable ilk will lose. That just tortures you, doesn’t it. Keep ranting though, that means our system is still working. You’re kind of the canary in the tunnel. Mwah!
Well, and this is pretty scary stuff too. Not news, not surprising, not anything other than common knowledge, but still pretty scary and repulsive.
“Clearly transformed by Sept. 11, the President makes a point of projecting strength, confidence, and determination.
President Bush: “A president has got to be the calcium in the backbone. — If I weaken, the whole team weakens. — If I’m doubtful, I can assure you there will be a lot of doubt.”
And Mr. Bush wants strength, not doubt, in his cabinet.
“In the midst of tough times I don’t need people around me who are not steady,” Bush tells Woodward. “And if there’s a kind of a hand-wringing attitude going on when times are tough, I don’t like it.”
No doubt, no hand-wringing - meaning, you know, no thought, no reflection, no considering implications, no weighing alternatives, no imagination, no scruples. Just - pick a plan, quick, and then by gum stick to it no matter what. Calcium, back bone; strength, confidence and determination.
Wow, rd has tapped into some vein of wignuttery so dark that he doesn’t even begin to make sense anymore. This is probably an example of a Pareto improvement.
Explanations are required where decisions of granting of power is being made: Bush will require an explanation and a vision in November, Kerry just requires the vision. Even breast-beating visions require a foundation of facts, logic and argument to succeed, and a great leader needs all 4. I have seen nothing in either vision so far that will prevent another attack on a similar or worse scale to the WTC attack on September-11 - In that nothingness lies a problem, and millions of lives put at risk - that nothingness deserves an explanation (with a vision that works).
John Updike on frequent flyers:
THE OVERHEAD RACK
Worst of all, and most hated by me
as I sit docilely crammed in my seat,
crammed and strapped like a psychotic in restraints,
are these bland-faced complacent graduates
of business schools, trained to give each other
and the rest of the poor world the business,
who attempt to stuff their not one but two folding bags
big enough to hold an army of business suits
into the overhead rack, already crammed
with traveling crap like a constipated ox’s
intestine. The blonde doors cannot lower,
the hats and bags of earlier arrivals
are crushed. Why don’t the smug smooth bastards check
proliferating printouts, sheaf on sheaf,
at the ticket counter, or, better yet,
stay home and attend to their neglected wives
and morose, TV-mesmerized offspring
instead of crowding their slick and swollen bags
and egos onto my airplane, my tube in space, my
clean shot home? Like slats of a chicken coop
overrunning with dung are the overhead racks.
If we crash, thus overloaded, the world
will yield up a grateful sigh at the headlines:
one less batch of entrepreneurs to dread.
Oh, kill, kill, kill, I think, watching the filth
strap itself in, exhaling airport beer
and nasal exchanges of professional dirt,
those fat corpuscles in the nation’s bloodstream:
Oh, would I were a flying macrophage!
- John Updike
From the Ontario Review, No. 42, Spring/Summer 1995.
q. “Even breast-beating visions require a foundation of facts, logic and argument to succeed, and a great leader needs all 4.”
I only count 3. What is the 4th thing a vision requires? Do visions require visions? Do you see things q.? Hear voices? If you peel the onion, I would think Kerry encompasses everything you hate. You just cannot support him as an individual. I don’t believe you.
rd-
A great leader needs all 4 of vision, facts, logic and argument.
Kieran, you forgot the part on how you become President.
How do you plan to get elected? Is your father a former President? Do you have a brother in Florida? Are you a former alcoholic and cocaine addict saved by the Bible? How about Vietnam, did you find a way to avoid going? Are you in good terms with the Reverend Moon? Did you work in the oil industry? And most importantly, did you do good business with the bin Ladens?
If the answer is “no”, sorry, I see no chance for you. Which is a real pity, cos your holy war on irritating habits sounds so cool.
Hey pepi, we could be the next Hannity and Colms! Now turn your “How do you plan to get elected?” criteria to the Democratic candidate. I’m betting a person of your wit could make it sound equally unattractive. Of course, you might stimulate a debate concerning the quality of choices our two point one party system offers us voters these days. I’d prefer that debate over “my horse shit candidate is better than what I think of your horse shit candidate.” It seems that’s what we’ve sunk to.
Could you also include “People With Carry On Luggage So Stuffed They Can Barely Support Its Weight”, and “Short People Sitting in the Seats with Extra Leg Room” ?
The difference between this exchange and less leftist exchanges is sriking.
Many visit; few return.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review