Dan Dennett has an example somewhere where he imagines that someone discovers the score of a hitherto lost Bach cantata. But by an unfortunate co-incidence, the first few notes are identical to “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer” thus preventing us from ever having the experience eighteenth-century Leipzigers had of the music. Pauline and I have an interest in Art Nouveau, and, surfing ebay to see what there was for sale, she stumbled on an exquisite brooch designed by Charles Horner of Chester in 1895 or 6. From the description:
The brooch is decorated with a flyfot symbol. In Western traditions, the flyfots arms each represent one of the four elements, and the extention symbolizes that element in motion; thus representing life and movement. It was also used by the Maya, Navajo, Jains and Buddhists. In Scandinavia mythology it represents Thor’s hammer.
Did you know what a flyfot is? No, neither did I.
The real name of this symbol (apart from the one we all know) is fylfot.
Reference to the Navajo gives it away.
I thought it was ‘fylfot’. I grew up going to an Episcopalian (i.e., more or less Anglican) church in Los Angeles, built around 1910. There was a whole miscellany of symbols in the floor-tiles, including some of these. Their ancient origins and unfortunate modern resonance were discussed, but evidently nobody found them bad enough to change — not even in 1944!
To describe the fylfot as representing “the four elements, and the extention symbolizes that element in motion; thus representing life and movement” is pure marketing hype, probably invented by the advertiser of the brooch. The word probably derives from “fill foot”, denoting something used to fill in gaps in a pattern, but may originally have been a nonceword.
I always feel a strange jolt when I see maps of Korea and Japan that indicate the location of a Buddhist temple with a swastika until I remember that “swastika” derives from a Sanskrit word meaning “well-being”.
A bit of folk wisdom is that the Nazi swastika is oriented clockwise an/or compass-style, while benign versions are not. This actually isn’t the case, however. The pre-Nazi version comes in all flavors.
My understanding is that the symbol on the brooch is a mandala pattern (I’d never heard of fylfots either but who knows), whereas the mirror image of that symbol is a swastika. The points on a swastika circle counterclockwise.
And, by the way, I’d argue that the appropriateness of the use of the symbol is defined by its cultural context. So, in most western, contemporary contexts, the fact that the symbol is ancient, predates the Nazis, and is benign is insufficient as an argument for its appropriateness.
Although now that I’ve written that, I fear that I’ve just asserted something so obvious as to be stupendously banal.
Keith — your assertion isn’t quite obvious enough that I understand how you want to apply it here. I doubt the desperate eclecticism of the eBay description will reassure Pauline enough to wear the brooch to the opera….but do you think that in 1941, the few inconspicuous tiles should have been pried up from the floor of St. James’ Wilshire?
You know sometimes the it rotates clockwise and sometimes counterclockwise, it can be so difficult to know which way we’re actually going, thank god that George Bush knows the way
scroll down the page, notice anyting out of place?
Bryan — Yes, and yesterday there was a Reuters headline that read something like, “Bush: Iraq War Reduced Conflict in Region”.
Vance — definitly not in 1941. Now, maybe. But in that example, the tiles aren’t that likely to be noticed and, if necessary, the context can be explained. The more prominent the symbol and the greater the likliehood it will be misinterpreted, the more inappropriate it is.
I was rather grimly amused to see a swastika or whateveryoucallit symbol on the carven robes of the effigy of a bishop in Coventry Cathedral. If I’ve remembered right the effigy lies within sight of the famous cross made from two charred beams left after the Luftwaffe raid of November 1940, in a part of the old cathedral that has deliberately not been rebuilt. The stonecarvers weren’t to know that the Nazis would one day appropriate the symbol, of course, but I was also surprised to see it on a Christian prelate’s robes given that I had long thought of it as a Hindu symbol. Perhaps as Alan says above it was mere pattern.
We also own an old edition of Kipling’s poems that is decorated with a swastika on the spine. Here the Sanskrit/Hindu link seems more natural. My husband, a teacher, took the book to school to show his pupils and used it as a starting point for a discussion of how symbols can change with time.
Well I have an anecdote that is somewhat applicable: some years ago I worked at a data entry position keying in government data, one time a form came through for a child with a name that just made the guy reading it express his disgust with the parents and the desire to hunt down and kill them. Yes these degenerate scum had named their child Swastika!
So I asked “Is that the nazi swastika, or is it the hindu svastika?”
“Oh it’s the nazi alright”
everyone was really horrified, and damn if it wasn’t a lucky thing that we didn’t just go drive out to the address on the form and dispense some justice.
Well after a bit the form came to me when it was my turn to rekey it(forms were keyed by two people as an error checking policy), and guess what, yes the kid’s name was Svastika Prandeep or some other Hindu type name. And yes, she/he lived at a little Hare Krishna community in the area. When I explained this matter though, no one was the least bit mollified, because after all people living in a culture should take into account what is appropriate etc.
Well my theory is that when a proud Hindu parent cannot name their child Svastika then the Nazis will have already won.
Mandala may have other meanings, but in Buddhism it is a sand-drawn square representation of the universe, with nor relation to swastikas pointed in either direction. There’s one in Kundun.
The Manx flag resembles a 3-pointed swastika.
I am surprised it was sold so cheaply. I am always surprised that antique jewelry seems to have so little collector’s added-value.
Okay, I’ve just hauled down the ?20 lb.? “F” tome of the OED and it has a long entry for fylfot. The word appears first in the Lansdowne MS (1500) and is accepted as meaning “fill-foot.” Extensively used symbol identified with the swastika of India; sometimes used as a mystical symbol.
Don’t forget the swastika can be seen in B.C. Greek pottery, etc. A handsome symbol, damn near ruined by the Nazis.
I am surprised it was sold so cheaply. I am always surprised that antique jewelry seems to have so little collector’s added-value.
I doubt it would have sold so cheaply had it been a floral design, say, despite the missing pin.
It’s like naming your kid “Adolf.” Saying that you admire the charitable works of St Adolphus of Osnabruck just won’t do any more.
there is an artist called manwoman who is working v. hard at reorienting this symbol, and has written a book on it, as well as making and collecting art…i dont see why we cannot have this anceint, holy, and almost universal symbol of order again…fuck the nazis.
http://www.manwoman.net/swastika/
The Basques continue to use a related curvilinear symbol called the lauburu.
“The Manx flag resembles a 3-pointed swastika.”
Which was of course the symbol of the Ossewa Brandwagt, one of the white power groups in South Africa in the 1980’s who insisted that apartheid would end over their dead bodies. When asked about why they chose a symbol that so obviously resembled a swastika, they were full of denials —- apparently it represents three ‘7’s, each 7 meaning 7 virtues or whatever.
A handsome symbol, damn near ruined by the Nazis.
“Damn near”?!
You know what makes me curious (aside from the fact that the swirling cross—swastika—appears in many cultures (well, it is a design relatively easy to incorporate into linear media such as baskets, weaving, and tiles) how is it that it can’t be reclaimed)— the Nazi regime was vile; the destruction of European Jewry was a tragedy—how about the hammer and sickle? Weren’t more people killed? Howe about whatever symbol Pol Pot used? How about little radios, the source of the genocide in Africa?
When asked about why they chose a symbol that so obviously resembled a swastika, they were full of denials —- apparently it represents three ‘7’s, each 7 meaning 7 virtues or whatever.
And their flag very strongly resembled the Nazi flag — red with a white circle in the middle with the black fylfot-like symbol on the circk=le.
Dennett’s hypo about Bach and “Rudolph” reminds me of this eerily prescient 14th century fresco:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2481749.stm
H.G. Wells, in his History of the World, commented on the ubiquity of the swastika in Bronze Age decoration. He described it as a sun disk. The illustrations looked more like spirals than crosses, IIRC.
I don’t think anyone’s going to see anything sinister in the Isle of Man’s triskelion.
However, the black-white-red color scheme that Rachelrachel mentions does sound uncomfortably like the Prussian “blood-and-iron” flag of WWI as well as the Nazi Flag. It’s easy to read too much into color choices, but one can at least surmise that no attempt was made to avoid that association.
Asymmetrical symbols, like text, the fylfot or the triskelion, are problematic on flags, since preserving their sense requires fabricating both sides separately, which is seldom practical. I was reminded of this when I took the Gadsden flag to an antiwar demonstration last Saturday. Because of the prevailing wind it presented its reverse to the highway.
DONT TREAD ON ME was an ambiguous message anyway, so it probably didn’t much matter that it was presented backwards.
And as for Bach’s Rudolf cantata, am I the only person who hears “Oh, Susanna” in Schumann’s third symphony?
‘how is it that it can’t be reclaimed)— the Nazi regime was vile; the destruction of European Jewry was a tragedy—how about the hammer and sickle? Weren’t more people killed’
Well the problem may well be that people WANT to reclaim the swastika, it has an ancient and noble history, it is found in all sorts of decoration all over the world, and therefore there are strong psychological imperatives to reclaim it. To do this reclamation is to triumph over naziism in a way.
I’m sure, as a symbol that has been around for so long, it has no doubt had to be reclaimed many times in the past, the only difference being that with past reclamations this could happen by people who knew of it as a bad thing would die out or forget, not having a great deal of media to remind them (Nothing comes to mind that would work as an example of this, I’m just making a statement of belief as to how the world works.)
I don’t think anyone outside of a communist or just someone that likes trouble would want to reclaim the hammer and sickle, there is no historical or cultural significanse to that sign that I’m aware of other than it’s Soviet one. That said I used to wear a jacket with a hammer and sickle on it back in my early twenties when I lived in Utah cause it was great for starting fights, but I had no intention of reclaiming the symbol - I just fancied myself something of a mean bastard.
The Maltese symbol is similar to the Sicilian “three-legged emblem charged with the head of a gorgon.” Go here for a look.
The Nazi swastika is angled at forty five degrees whereas the Hindu swastika isn’t. Among Indian Hindus both inside and outside India, the swastika is still commonly used in festive decorations, usually in conjunction with “om.” See this item on sale for $2.95 for example. It can be a problem when Hindus in America put swastikas on their cars.
P.J. O’Rourke, in his essay on India that was in a recent Best American Writing, notes that he kept seeing decorations that seemed to say “Sieg Heil. Om Shanti. Sieg Heil.”
I know a serious academic named Ronald McDonald. He is old enough that he was named before the clown/hamburger salesman, but that was still a bad idea.
In Hillsborough County, Florida, there’s a platted subdivision named “Swastika Subdivision.” Right there top and center on the record plat is a big fat fylfot symbol. As I remember the plat predates those God damn Nazis. I once surveyed a lot in that sub. The chief of parties handed me the rolled-up plat and the subdivision file folder and said, “You’re not going to believe the name of this plat!”
Oddly enough, there’s a really strange display at one of the Smithsonian Museums with an inadvertant swastika. An old photo of Amelia Earhart has her wearing a flightsuit with a swastika on it. This was, due to some horrible coincidence, only a few rooms away from some World War II exhibits. Extremely odd when your brain suddenly screams “Amelia Earhart flew for the Luftwaffe? Huh?”
More evidence for the fact that I occasionally fall in and out of alternate universes.
It’s pretty and a pity.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review