I’m just about to knock off for Christmas1, but I have to get ready for a conference at Queensland Uni of Technology early in the New Year where Larry Lessig will be the main speaker. I’m giving a very short presentation, and struggling to improve my understanding of all this, in particular the relationship between the technology of the Internet and notions of social capital. I haven’t come up with anything earthshattering, but I have had some thoughts on which I’d welcome comments.
Lessig stresses benefits of networks with intelligence at the ends rather than the centre. I want to think about this with respect to the network as a device for disseminating innovations, as well as for communication. In a centralised network, any innovation is automatically available to all users, so the dissemination problem is trivial. On the other hand, only those in charge of the network have the capacity to innovate. In a network with intelligence at the ends, innovators may need to take positive action to share their ideas, and can easily conceal innovations or restrict access if there are incentives for this.
This is reflected, I think in the disappointing returns to the vast amounts or money and effort poured into customer-service innovations of various kinds during the dotcom era. Everything was proprietary, and often patent-protected2. So even if the parts of a good idea were all there, they were unlikely to come together.
To make innovation work in an end-oriented network, we need the kind of social capital, and also the kinds of technical protocols that encourage and facilitate sharing. What these are is a topic for further research.
1 Despite work intensification and so on, Australia still shuts down almost completely for a couple of weeks.
2 I had my first experience of One-Click shopping at Amazon the other day. I’m sure I’d get used to it in the end, but I must say I found it rather unnerving. One click to place the order and one to confirm it suits me rather better.
How interesting … this has echoes of Odlyzko’s paper http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/pricing.architecture.pdf, that discussed what amounted to an end-to-end argument in pricing.
And, oddly enough, it has echoes of the end-to-end argument itself.
Lessig stresses benefits of networks with intelligence at the ends rather than the centre.
Indeed. I’m trying to imagine the converse - perhaps a 1980s Telecom Australia that’s more like the ANU rather than the nation’s largest sheltered workshop.
To make innovation work in an end-oriented network
Depends on the innovation. The blogosphere is an example of an exchange of ideas without a pricing model. Does this fall under your definition of social capital, John?
The blogosphere is very much my paradigm example. In fact, if anything I run the risk of relying too much on it as a model, so if people can point out how it may be atypical, that would be good.
Kenneth Arrow relevant here? I was thinking of writing a piece called “God and Kenneth Arrow” in response to the 2004 election fiasco (basically, Republicans have top-down hierarchy based on, first, God; second, Party; third, GW—while Democrats have “majorities in minority a majority of the time”—something reflected in rather poor showing of blog/meetup hype of this years’ Internet campaigns; God of course, is ultimate dictator/arbiter of goods/wants—if we all follow God’s desires rath our own, no Arrow/Voters Paradox)—but probably won’t. What I’m thinking is this: given complexity AND logical structure of distributed goods on your network, any way in which you CAN arbitrate what gets distributed may just be a tremendous PLUS (also: isn’t this just why traditional media/editorial power hasn’t been undermined much by inet?).
Reminds me of Thomas Malone’s recent book, “The Future of Work,” in which he discusses four kinds of decentralized production networks: loose hierarchies, democracies, internal markets, and external markets. He recommends different mixtures of each, depending on the task you’re trying to accomplish (in a discussion of this kind, for example, the blogpost/comments form a loose hierarchy, where the post forms a nodal point for [ideally] intelligent input). It does seem to me that effective sharing in a truly decentralized network requires the services of a “librarian” of some kind, even if it’s only a machine aggregator.
In a centralized network, everybody is directly able to access innovation in one step.
In a network like the web, there might be several steps (as there are in networks of who knows who.) You might be able to relate diffusion models to size of the network, degrees of connectivity, and the numbr of novel ideas integrated in an invention. Then you could predict rates of innovation as those three variables change.
Not all innovations may be desired by everyone in the network. It seems the more useful an innovation is to a wider audience the faster it will be adopted in an end oriented network. And it will be adopted first by the people who need it most.
In a centralized scheme I assume innovations are imposed top down rather than adopted bottom up. There seems like there could be some potential fall backs to this. Some innovations appeal only to specific groups. Others are better off with out being required to learn this new innovation that really doesn’t help them.
The lost time in mastering this new little widget could actually cost some people in the long run in a centralized network when established ways of doing things would have worked just as well.
Paging Ronald Coase and his theory of the firm yet again? Of course you need a mix of different cooperation styles.
Someone whose views I respect on this argues that the end-oriented Internet as idealized by folks like Lessig is long dead, what with NAT and firewalls and vpns and QoS and whatnot. And treating networks with a bunch of internal intelligence as completely end-oriented can be as bad as thinking that market institutions are frictionless and don’t matter…
One of the issues here may be more about physical capital than about social capital — in many other post-cataclysmic booms (the post-ww2 manufacturing and electronics boom is pretty much paradigmatic) you had enormous amounts of surplus stuff lying around, already paid for, for anyone smart to make use of at very low cost. This time around, Moore’s laws has substantially reduced the utility of much of that surplus stuff, with the possible exception of some of the expertise. But whether that social capital is stable enough to stick around and be shared isn’t immediately clear to me.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review