Looks as though Berlusconi has outed himself as a moral relativist; he’s told two interviewers that Mussolini wasn’t such a bad chap after all. Berlusconi is quoted as replying to a question comparing Mussolini and Saddam by saying:
Mussolini never killed anyone. Mussolini sent people on holiday in internal exile [a fare vacanza al confino].
He’s now backtracking, saying that he never intended to signal a ‘re-evaluation’ of Mussolini, and was merely defending Italian national pride and honour.
I wasn’t re-evaluating Mussolini; I was acting as a patriot. As an Italian, I wasn’t accepting a comparison between Mussolini and Saddam.
Berlusconi is crying unfair. He claims that it was an informal interview and that the journalists had promised that he could vet the interview before publication. Maybe so; but equally likely, he thought he was talking to ideological friends, and could get away with a certain amount of indiscretion. The two interviewers work for the Spectator, a Conservative rag in Britain; one of them, Boris Johnson, is a Eurosceptic Tory MP (and occasional amiable buffoon on the BBC’s Have I Got News for You).
Whatever. Berlusconi’s now on record as defending Mussolini and downplaying his reprehensible behavior as a Fascist dictator. As the Guardian reminds us, Mussolini not only had various opponents bumped off; he also oversaw the introduction of racial laws, forced labour and internment camps for Jews. Which, to put it mildly, don’t count as ‘holidays’ in my books.
I’ll be interested to see whether the various people who denounce ‘Old Europe’ as a snakepit of jackboot-fancying anti-Semites have anything to say about this. Various figures on the right jumped to Berlusconi’s defence a couple of months ago, over the various corruption allegations he’s dealing with, and his previous Nazi-related gaffe in the European Parliament. Michael Ledeen, for example, described Berlusconi as a ‘passionate freedom fighter,’ cheering him for having
the courage to speak the truth when the rest of the Eurocrats were cowering behind the conventional wisdom.
William Sjostrom, among many others, concurred, dismissing criticisms of Berlusconi as the carping of ‘crybaby leftists.’
How will Berlusconi’s erstwhile defenders react to his latest statement? If Chirac or Schroeder had said anything like what Berlusconi said, I imagine that these commentators would be all over it, trumpeting it as further evidence of anti-Semitism and nostalgia for Fascism in Europe. Will they apply the same standard when the apologist for Fascism is a Bush ally, and strong supporter of the Iraq invasion? I very much hope so.
Update: translation retweaked, thanks to Andrew Chen.
Mussolin invaded Ethiopia and dropped poison gas on their villages. The comparison to Saddam is apt. I don’t suspect the Ethiopians who were slaughtered thought they were being sent on holiday.
Oh yea, Mussolini also made common cause with Adolph Hitler and helped unleash WWII. What a poor, misunderstood man.
Great, now “Mussolini: Not as bad as Hitler!” is being replaced by “Mussolini: Not as bad as Saddam!”
I don’t think 4000 of Mussolini’s subjects ever died in a heat wave, though.
Geez. The more I see what Europeans really think, the more it scares me.
I recommend Tobias Jones’s The Dark Heart of Italy: not just because he’s a mate from college, but because it’s a really great book on the state of modern Italian politics and culture.
“‘Tony told me that he was completely serene about criticisms over his relationship with me,’ says Silvio Berlusconi . .” - from The Guardian on 19 March 2002 at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,669873,00.html
In Martin Clark’s book: Modern Italy 1871-1995; Longman (2nd ed. 1996), p. 250, where he writes about the policies of Mussolini’s fascist government: “They seemed to offer ‘a third way’, between capitalism and Bolshevism, which looked attractive in the Depression. . .”
I’ve often wondered whether Berlusconi, who has long harboured NeoFascists in his cabinet, was a CryptoFascist himself, or simply a greedy man, as a Serbian friend of mine scornfully called Milosevic.
I’m not sure that this proves the case either way.
For what it’s worth, Eric, you can rest assured that the vast majority of Europeans think this way.
I have yet to meet a German who would defend Hitler in attempting to be patriotic; rather most hate his memory and all it stands for.
I’m pretty sure that Mussolini apologists are in almost equally short supply in Italy.
First the Hitler wines, now this. Good grief.
How can we old Mussolini responsible for using poison gas in Ethiopia when “Greatest Man of the 20th Century, or what not” Winston Churchill did exactly the same thing - in Iraq, I belive - in 1921 as Colonial Secretary?
If there’s stuff we don’t like about Mussolini (obviously there is, much of it valid - the guy was a horrendous figure, and one would be hard pressed to make the case that he was at all better than Saddam), it’s hardly his use of poison gas in an African country.
Just to note a bit further, I don’t think Mussolini was particularly anti-Semitic in himself. He did introduce racial laws, but largely due to German pressure. There were Jews in the Italian Fascist Party, for instance. So Mussolini was more of a monstrously amoral opportunist than anything else.
It would be nice to think that Mussolini apologists are indeed in short supply in Italy. But reading books like Tim Parks’s An Italian Education, suggests that casual expressions of nostaligia for the fascist period are rather common.
As an Italian I am ashamed of Berlusconi.
Most of the people I know would not agree with his judgement about Mussolini.
“How can we hold Mussolini responsible for using poison gas in Ethiopia when … Winston Churchill did exactly the same thing”
Since when is “Others do it, too” an excuse for a crime ?
This only means that Churchill was not the saint that WWII legends makes him. It does not mean that Mussolini is a good guy.
Greetings
Karl Heinz
Hamburg, Germany
I’d just like to say that Hitler was, of course, Austrian. Not that it really alters Greg’s point.
John, I don’t think you’re actually trying to say you approve of using gas in Africa, but will you please stop it!
Don’t blame Mussolini because Churchill used gas in Iraq. Don’t blame al Qaeda for the WTC attack because of American backing for the atrocities in Chile. Don’t blame Hitler because Stalin liquidated the Kulaks?
Can we all have a five minute moratorium on moral mind games.
Your translation is still off.
“Al confine” means “to the border”,
i.e. exile. It has nothing to do
with being confined; quite the opposite.
Still an outrageous lie, of course.
Andrew
Thanks for the correction - duly noted. I’d originally translated it as ‘holiday in internal exile,’ and then found that a little wordy, and hadn’t been sure it was 100% accurate - the English speaking press were translating it differently, and I don’t have my dictionary with me in Toronto. Hence the change - but also hence my leaving the original Italian phrase in, precisely in case my translation was still not entirely accurate.
I’d just like to say that Hitler was, of course, Austrian.
Ah, Austria… the country whose primary purpose seems to be attempting to convince the world that Hitler was really German and Beethoven was really Austrian.
“This only means that Churchill was not the saint that WWII legends makes him”
Churchill once remarked that history would be kind to him; he knew that because he wrote the history books!
“If it wasn’t true, it should have been, and more and better besides”!
Of course it was also Berlusconi who said in the lead up to war in Iraq that we SHOULD fight a war for Western values against Islam. Then again that view sadly seems to be as widely held in some circles as his views on Musollini are not.
A stupid comment from an Italian, BUT how bad was Mussolini? Well, it does depend on who you are comparing him with. If it is against say the Generalisimo or Bela Kun of Hungary, he’s about average, but if it is against totalitarian dictators - he’s not so bad. As a mass murderer he’s not fit to wear ol’ Pol Pot’s jock strap. I’d also say he’s not quite up there with Fidel, who is a mass murderer and been in power much longer. Yet Fidel is loved by Hollywood and a lot of the left wing establishment in this country. Berlusconi must be just a tad smarter than those Bozos , right?
I’m not excusing Mussolini’s use of poison gas. I’m saying that we’re extremely selective about whose use of poison gas horrifies us. I mean, be honest, the fact that Mussolini used poison gas is not why people think he’s awful. If it were, people would also think Churchill is awful. And FDR, for agreeing to the fire bombing of Dresden, which was surely at least as bad as any poison gassing.
If all Mussolini had done was gassed some Africans, I don’t think he would have gone down in history as an awful dictator. It’s all the other stuff that makes people dislike Mussolini. And he’s certainly worthy of very strong dislike. And the fact that he gassed a bunch of Ethiopians certainly is another reason to dislike him. But it, in itself, has nothing to do with why he’s a famous “evil dictator”.
“But it, in itself, has nothing to do with why he’s a famous “evil dictator.’”
He’s a famous evil dictator because he was best pals with the most famous evil dictator in history, Adolph Hitler. I’m not sure what relevance Mussolini’s claim to fame has to Berlusconi’s apology.
“I mean, be honest, the fact that Mussolini used poison gas is not why people think he’s awful.”
It’s one of the reasons I think he’s awful. He invaded another country without cause and deliberately murdered civilians (which is the reason poison gas is vile: it is mainly a weapon for the mass murder of civilians. It may not be particularly efficient, but is also not particularly discriminant).
“If it were, people would also think Churchill is awful. And FDR, for agreeing to the fire bombing of Dresden, which was surely at least as bad as any poison gassing.”
Many people do think that Churchill’s use of poison gas and the fire bombing of Dresden were awful. They also balance those atrocities with the good things accomplished by Churchill and Roosevelt (such as defeating Nazi Germany). Mussolini’s only redeeming quality, apparently, was making the trains run on time.
“I don’t have my dictionary with me in Toronto”
Old mindset Henry. you don’t need to buy the whole transhumanist bit to remember there is the internet……….
On the more substantive point, I find it incredible how many people are trying to make up excuses for Mussolini. He was bad, but he wasn’t that bad etc. Incredible.
I mean these days it’s a regular insult to call someone a fascist who isn’t. Aznar seems to do this almost every single day. Well I don’t think there’s any doubt Mussolini was, he even said he was. And there is also that other little detail: he was Hitler’s closest ally.
“Most of the people I know would not agree with his judgement about Mussolini”.
This is a kind of social networks point, they wouldn’t because like you they’d be reasonable. I don’t know anyone in Barcelona who votes PP, but they still form the government. (read Granovetter).
However I do feel that criticising Berlusconi is to miss the point, his comments are for home consumption, and then indirectly for us. He’s happy if we take him seriously, that’s good for him back home (Italy we will remember is a rapidly ageing society, and this is going to have its inevitable political dimension). This is pretty similar in Spain, and it shouldn’t be overlooked that after his ‘disappointment’ with Tony, Aznar’s new ‘friend’ is Berlusconi. The Spanish media is full of this. And when Aznar sounds off about how, for example, the UK - with it’s Gibraltar mafia interests - is responsible for the Prestige disaster, a comment which even merited a front page ‘its a lie’ article from the FT, just remember, facts aren’t important here, it’s the domestic market that matters.
And all this naustalgia for fascism gets pretty scary when you look at the numbers of people who will be either ‘lame, blind or mute’ or suffering some modern equivalent like Altzheimer or Senile Dementia, and will be ‘non-productive’ from the point of view of a state which may neither be willing nor able to support them.
Remember: Hiter’s first victims were not Jewish.
BTW Henry: I also have an old minset sometimes, so I checked the Cambridge Italian Dictionary and they give the alternative reading: Mandare al confine - Send into exile.
So congratulations, your intuition was good. Still exile could be internal, external……or something like Dante’s Inferno. We can leave the reader to decide.
My favorite bit on this was the explanation from an Italian government spokesperson that Berlusconi’s comments were “a witticism bordering on the paradoxical.”
There’s one for Scott McClellan to keep in mind…
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review