According to conservative philosopher Roger Scruton, Immanuel Kant would have been a supporter of the Iraq war . I’m posting this as a curiosity, really, since it seems unlikely to me that Kant, who didn’t allow peoples the right to overthrow despots (however much he might rejoice at the consequences) would have allowed the legitimacy of one people overthrowing another people’s regime (however despotic).
I can’t be the first person to think that “Scrutonize (v.)” should be in a dictionary somewhere. Perhaps Ophelia can help us out.
I agree with Chris. Still, it’s not a wholly flawed interpretation. The key is the way Scruton sets states like Iraq outside the rational law which Kant held to be available to all men, should they only open themselves up to the “maxims of the philosophers.” The rational republic would embrace the principle of non-revolution, and fit more or less seamlessly into a philosophical League of Nations-type arrangement. Scruton argues that “a League of Nations can establish a genuine rule of law only if its members are also republics. Unless that condition is fulfilled, nations remain in the rivalrous state of nature.” Which means the rational law would be on hold for non-republics like Iraq. In other words, Scruton holds that Kant’s imperative would itself justify acting in violation of otherwise Kantian principles if the context itself wasn’t (or hadn’t yet become) Kantian. Bingo: Kant becomes a kind of rational imperialist, imposing republicanism categorically. I think a lot of the universalist rhetoric of certain liberal hawks (think Oxblog, for example) is somewhat Kantian, in this sense.
Well, there is a dictionary definition for “scrutonize.” Sort of. Vide the philosophical lexicon:
scrutonize, v. “To conflate two disciplines at a superficial level so that dinner party conversations could continue in the spurious belief that matters of moment were being discussed while the port was passed.” - David Dunster, Architectural Design, December 1979, p. 327.
Does Scruton say which cigarette the now-liberated Iraqis should smoke?
All I can say is that Kant is really hot right now, for a 200-yr-dead irrelevant difficult philosopher. And I guess this means I got to read Perpetual Peace tonight, which is on my hard drive. Sigh.
At least Scruton namechecks mine hosts….
Even if we allow that Kant might have supported the overthrow of the Iraqi government, he surely would not have condoned the use of false pretenses in order to gain public support for the war.
Scruton sidesteps this issue by making it an issue solely about despotism.
Good point Gretchen. Even if you accept this reading of Kant’s formula for perpetual peace, then you’re still faced with the personal Kantian imperative to move towards this end without duplicity. Thus, Scruton’s Kant would be, at best, one of us many doubting hawks, confronted with the possibility that the actors entrusted with the war actually ended up invalidating the argument for war by the way they carried it out.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart for the opportunity to recall one of Germaine Greer’s finest moments, when she said in a radio panel discussion that “The problem with Scruton is that he’s writing about Kant and he doesn’t know the first thing about Kant”. Since the short German “a” in “Kant” is not unlike an Australian short “u”, and since the natural interpretation based on both Greer’s history and Scruton’s sexual politics would be the obscene one, it gave the presenter a nasty few moments.
Ah yes: the presenter was Mark Lawson and his account of the incident is reproduced in comments to this post (scroll down to comment by Kes).
Well, Kant would certainly have argued that we cannot reach a definitive judgement regarding the noumenal existence of Iraqi WMD, nor frankly should we bother. Their phenomenal existence is another matter, of course.
I see the noumenal ones as kind of floating around in mid-air, maybe after dark. This may have some bearing on Scruton’s claim and should be sent his way.
One would think that Roger had read Was ist Aufklärung. Still, Kant did come around to supporting the French Revolution.
Yes, excellent point Gretchen. I don’t know enough specific Kant to know if this question has application, but: If his account of state actions is like his account of individual actions, what matters will not be the action that the U.S. performed but the maxim under which it was performed. So if the U.S. did not go to war with the intention of making Iraq into a republic, the war wasn’t justified even on Scrukantian* grounds.
The question would be, how do you identify the maxim under which a republic acts? I’d guess you look at the war resolution, in ideal circumstances. But maybe there’s an answer somewhere in Kant’s actual writings.
*Scruton’s interpretation of Kant, a la “Kripkenstein.”
I’d better change “with the intention of” to “for the purpose of making Iraq a republic.” Even I will not deny that the Bush Administration intended to make Iraq a republic, if it could be done easily (which they thought it could).
“But it would be quite different if a state, by internal rebellion, should fall into two parts, each of which pretended to be a separate state making claim to the whole. To lend assistance to one of these cannot be considered an interference in the constitution of the other state (for it is then in a state of anarchy)” — Perpetual Peace
This could be used as a justification, though we did not want the Kurds declaring any kind of independence. But in general, he was very firm in not overthrowing despots, argued in a way entirely consistent with his moral system. And the other prohibitions (i.e., spies and inciting treason) make our actions in Iraq un-Kantian.
I found this quite interesting:
“But as an opposing machine in the antagonism of powers, a credit system which grows beyond sight and which is yet a safe debt for the present requirements—because all the creditors do not require payment at one time—constitutes a dangerous money power.” — Perpetual Peace
“…dangerous because it is a war treasure which exceeds the treasures of all other states; it cannot be exhausted except by default of taxes (which is inevitable), though it can be long delayed by the stimulus to trade which occurs through the reaction of credit on industry and commerce.”
“Therefore, to forbid this credit system must be a preliminary article of perpetual peace all the more because it must eventually entangle many innocent states in the inevitable bankruptcy and openly harm them. They are therefore justified in allying themselves against such a state and its measures.”
Hmmm….
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review