A puff for one of my other collaborative projects: Imprints. The latest issue is now out and contains much of interest. The online content this time is an interview with Michael Walzer which ranges over many issues: the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the morality of humanitarian intervention, Israel and Palestine, anti-Semitism, memories of Rawls and Nozick, the permissibility of torture, blocked exchanges and commodification, the narcissism of Ralph Nader, and much more. Read the whole thing - it is both enlightening and provocative.
It looks fantastic but the usual bold-italic formatting on the questions has fallen off?
Questions are italicized with my browser…. It was a nightmare htmling it from Word, as Word leaves so much crap in the html and introduces gratuitous errors. But unless you’re using an early Netscape it should be ok.
It’s working now, sorry.
I read an interview with Chomsky in which he said that the only two humaniatarian interventions of the last fifty years were in East Pakistan and Cambodia, just like Walzer (I suppose they’ll have to agree to disagree on Israel and Kosovo).
Nixon’s The Real War presents an argument that the bombing of Cambodia was liberating for the Cambodians, but he doesn’t mention anything about the Vietnamese intervention. My theory is that this is due to the late-breaking events, not some isolated incident of mendacity on the author’s part.
Also, on the torture comment, suppose that the hypothetical terrorist in custody was impervious to torture. The authorities did have his infant child in custody, however, and torturing the baby would force him to reveal the school with the bomb. What then?
There’s a lot to the “ideology of the hypothetical” argument that points out these examples are purposefully absurd and their point is either to a) justify existing torture by the state and/or b) to normalize torture by creeping permissivism.
Fascinating interview. I think Walzer hits the nail on the head when he says that those defending civil liberties post 9/11 need to do more than howl outrage, and make more effort to explain how and why civil liberties are still important. However, while governments have succeeded in convincing the public that a painful but necessary trade off between civil liberties and national security is required, many of the putatively anti-terrorism measures I’ve seen have little direct bearing on national security. So the ‘trade off’ is often a red herring and makes it difficult for the left (and indeed the libertarian right) to make a hard case on civil liberties.
Walzer’s argument about the necessity of torture seems a bit, well, tortured. It’s not clear to me when he talks about wanting political leaders having the courage to ‘break the rules’ whether Walzer means violating ethical norms or possibly enacted legislation. Hoping leaders’ guilt at breaking these rules will be a sufficient disincentive to do so ‘too often’ sounds extremely weak. It seems to be the outsider’s corollary of that favoured and implicit argument of the Labour Party when enacting draconian legislation pre-9/11; ‘but you must trust us, we’re Labour for goodness sake!’ I don’t think the right has any monopoly on the opportunistic introduction of overbearing state powers.
By the way, why do we call them ‘civil liberties’ in developed countries and ‘human rights’ in developing ones?
I think his analysis of what France and Germany actually wanted to do is either too compressed, or is informed by his wanting to reach a conclusion, because it doesn’t really fit in with what I remember from Villepin’s public statements. As far as I can remember, DDV actually suggested coercive inspections as an alternative, with the proviso that they had to be under the control of the UN rather than the USA. The French and Germans simply didn’t trust the US (with, it turns out, good reason not to), and you don’t need anything beyond that to explain their behaviour.
I also don’t agree that the EU would have to spend materially more than it currently does in order to support a “new balance of power”, as opposed to “a new Empire run my well-meaning humanitarian liberal hawks”, but I suspect that’s another point. I also don’t agree with him on Kosovo or Afghanistan, and I think he’s being a bit disingenuous when he ignores the fact that the victory in Afghanistan made Iraq much more likely, and that this has to be counted as part of the cost of Afghanistan.
The sentence:
>>Had there been a UN intervention in Rwanda, as there should have been, it would surely have resulted in the overthrow of Hutu Power.
is just frightening, given the record of the UN in Kosovo in supervising and assisting the revenge of the Kosovars.
Yeah, I have to admit to being less than totally impressed with Walzer’s arguments about humanitarian intervention too. It was Europe that pushed for intervention in Kosovo, or at least it was routinely protrayed that way in the American press. European governments supported the war in Kosovo pretty thoroughly. Furthermore, I note that France and Germany have started building a stand-alone European military alliance in the face of British resistance. I should think this is exactly the kind of “taking responsibility” Walzer is advocating.
Canada, with French support, pressed for exactly the kind of coercive inspection regime designed to cover Iraq in inspectors and UN aid agents accompanied by UN troops. The Canadian proposal was pronounced DOA because of American resistance.
He also makes a weak case in favour of the war in Afghanistan. It certainly was not clear that Afghanistan’s attachment to terrorist networks was meaningfully stronger than Pakistan’s or Saudi Arabia’s. To say that it’s legitimate to go to war in Afghanistan, but that other countries can be addressed through sanctions and diplomacy is a mite suspicious.
And, there is a difference between a war conducted within a framework of international law and order, even a tentative one, and war conducted not only outside of it but in direct contradiction to the meagre rules that exist. It is the difference between the police breaking up a crack house in your neighbourhood, and you and your buddies busting in with shotguns and killing everyone there. It is quite possible for one to be juster than the other.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review