I don’t have much to say about the abuse of Iraqi prisoners that isn’t obvious; I’m just another guy who’s depressed and heartsick at the images on my screen. Just one point:
I don’t know what the Administration was thinking when they appointed John Negroponte, infamous for his role in Honduras in the 80s, as the ambassador to the new Iraq. I don’t know what they thought he could accomplish. I have my suspicions, but they might be unfairly colored by my general impression of the Administration.
At this point, hopes are irrelevant. Negroponte will be a massive detriment to the mission in Iraq. His story will be told again and again in the Arab press, and he will be a crystallizing symbol for anti-American forces who don’t believe in American goodwill. If the Administration wants to demonstrate its concern for the hearts and minds of Iraq, it will be necessary to find a replacement for Negroponte. (Among others.)
UPDATE: Tim Dunlop beat me to this point. The more, the merrier.
UPDATE: As is usually the case, Dwight Merideth has some thoughts that are well worth reading.
UPDATE: More from Jacob Levy on Rumsfeld:
Whatever credibility Rumsfeld had left has now been fatally undermined. It’s time to demand that he take responsibility and resign; he can no longer do his job anyways. The failure of the White House to understand that seems to be tied to a sense that, while Bush can judge Rumsfeld, no one else has any business doing so. Utterly obtuse.
Your Economist link is broken.. it says “An unexpected error has occured.” Which is actually a pretty good summary of a lot of things I can think of.
Huh. Works for me. It’s an editorial calling for Rumsfeld’s resignation or firing.
Meredith’s points are spot-on. The Bush admin, and especially Bush, talks about morality and responsibility, but its actions are inevitably completely self-serving and political. Period.
The linked editorial seems to say that an act warranting a public chastisement is necessarily an act warranting a demand for resignation. Why should that be the case?
Well, in the first place this wasn’t even a public chastisement. It was an officially-leaked-by-an-authorized-but-anonymous-official private chastisement. These people can’t even take responsibility for the release of the information of their evasions of responsibility.
In the second place, because public criticism (or even authorized-etc-etc criticism) of one’s own subordinates is a bizarre thing. Bush should want a publicly effective Secretary of Defense. Either that should be Rumsfeld, and the dressing-down should have remained private in order not to undercut Rumsfeld in public; or it should be someone else, and Rumsfeld should go. To hobble one’s own subordinates and leave them in office, to make plain that they do not have your “full confidence” even as you say that they do, is self-defeating. It also undermines the implicit deal between superordinate and subordinate: “Do your job well and I’ll protect you. Don’t, and I’ll find someone who will.”
Of course the editorial is not saying, implicating, or what have you any of the case. It is saying that what has happened is so severe that nothing short of resignation will do, and also that Rumsfeld doesn’t really deserve to keep his job on the merits.
Chastisement is free. Resignation means something.
Blech—should be “not saying or implicating anything of the sort”—namely that an act warranting a public chastisement is necessarily an act warranting a demand for resignation. As Nat should know full well.
Also, what Jacob said.
Matt Weiner wrote:
“Of course the editorial is not saying, implicating, or what have you any of the case.”
Sorry. I wrote “editorial” when I meant “blog”. Here’s what the blog said:
“If Bush genuinely thinks Rumsfeld failed him and failed to fulfill his own responsibilities, then surely the time has finally come to demand Rumsfeld’s resignation. If not, then an authorized public humiliation is unjustified.”
Ah, you mean Jacob Levy’s piece. Apologies—my imputations were unjustified, then, especially since Jacob does seem to argue that it’s never right to publicly chastise a subordinate without firing him.
Jacob T. Levy wrote:
“Well, in the first place this wasn’t even a public chastisement.”
Uh, you were the one to use the word “public” (assuming you’re the Jacob Levy who runs the blog in question). If you’d like to call it “private”, that’s fine. If you’d like to call it “semi-private”, that’s fine, too. I don’t see how it changes the point.
“In the second place, because public criticism (or even authorized-etc-etc criticism) of one’s own subordinates is a bizarre thing.”
What’s bizarre about it? It happens all the time: College presidents criticizing (and apologizing for the actions of) athletic directors; athletic directors criticizing (and apologizing for the actions of) coaches; coaches criticizing (and apologizing for the actions of) players; newspaper editors criticizing (and apologizing for the actions of) reporters; department chairs criticizing (and apologizing for the actions of) their faculty members; bishops criticizing (and apologizing for the actions of) their priests, etc.
“Bush should want a publicly effective Secretary of Defense.”
Yes, he should. Now, is a Secretary of Defense who’s committed an offense worthy of public (private, semi-private) criticism necessarily ineffective? That’s the question.
Give John Negroponte a chance. We have much better weapons to blast the trouble-makers these days than we used to back in the troubled cold war years of the early 80s, He is the right man to do a good job coordinating a smoke out of the last few enemies.
As the occupation continues both sides get lost in the smoke screen of fighting over who will run things, totally forgetting the one who should be running things is a native Iraqi, not an American lacky. The game continues with little views to the gross evidences of treason in the past. The smoke and mirrors machine running full blast.
“I don’t know what the Administration was thinking when they appointed John Negroponte…”
Thinking? This administration?
I know it’s nit-picking, but you say “he will be a crystallizing symbol for anti-American forces who don’t believe in American goodwill” - it is not just anti-Americans who don’t believe in American goodwill WRT Iraq - nobody in their right mind can possibly think that the Administration thinks of Iraqis as human beings. The appointment of Negroponte is entirely consistent with their aims and objectives and shoudl surprise nobody.
Brad DeLong, quite accurately I think, refers to the spectacle of a ‘private’ dressing-down of a cabinet officer by the president appearing in the headlines of hundreds of newspapers, as ‘dingbat Kabuki’.
“Tim Dunlop beat me to this point. The more, the merrier.”
I blogged the NYRB piece
two weeks ago, Ted.
Hope you’re watching the live hearings at this moment. The “Fire Rumsfeld” folks provided extra entertainment.
Rumsfeld isn’t going anywhere, and neither is Rice, and neither is Powell, and neither is Feith, and neither is Wolfowitz, and neither is Rove, and neither is Bush. Negroponte will be going somewhere, namely Baghdad.
The one and only way to change this picture is to vote Kerry in November. If you’re not an American, then help to make sure that all of the Americans you know are registered and vote — overseas Americans vote in their last state of residence, no matter how long they may have lived abroad, and thay may vote in federal elections, again, no matter how long they may have lived abroad.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review