From an editorial in the Washington Post today.
According to the International Red Cross, a number of people apparently in U.S. custody are unaccounted for. Most are believed to be held by the CIA in secret facilities outside the United States. Contrary to the Geneva Conventions, the detainees have never been visited by the Red Cross; contrary to U.S. and international law, some reportedly have been subjected to interrogation techniques that most legal authorities regard as torture.
…
What is known, mostly through leaks to the media, is that several of the CIA’s detainees probably have been tortured — and that a controversial Justice Department opinion defending such abuse was written after the fact to justify the activity. According to reports in The Post, pain medication for Abu Zubaida, who suffered from a gunshot wound in the groin, was manipulated to obtain his cooperation, while Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was subjected to “water boarding,” which causes the sensation of drowning. Notwithstanding the Justice Department opinion, parts of which recently were repudiated by the White House, U.S. personnel responsible for such treatment may be guilty of violating the international Convention Against Torture and U.S. laws related to it.
…
Nor has the CIA’s illegal behavior been limited to senior al Qaeda militants. The agency has been responsible for interrogating suspects in both Afghanistan and Iraq, and it is believed to have held a number in secret detention facilities. According to official reports, the identities of several in Iraq were deliberately concealed from the Red Cross, a violation of the Geneva Conventions. At least two detainees have died while being interrogated by CIA personnel. One CIA contractor has been charged with assault by the Justice Department in the case of one of the deaths, and at least two other cases are reportedly under investigation. But no higher-ranking CIA officials have been held accountable for the abuses or the decisions that led to them, even though it is now known that former CIA director George J. Tenet was directly involved in the “ghost detainee” cases in Iraq.
The Pentagon and Congress are investigating the Army’s handling of foreign detainees; though they are slow and inadequate, these probes contrast with the almost complete absence of scrutiny of the CIA’s activity.
I’m not especially keen on self-righteous denunciations of the “people of political position x are lying hypocrites unless they immediately denounce y” variety. Still, like Kieran, I have enormous difficulty in understanding why sincere, committed US libertarians (with some exceptions ) aren’t up in arms about this sort of thing. It seems to me to be an open-and-shut case of the kinds of state tyranny that libertarians should rightly be concerned about. Why is state-organized torture a less topical issue than state-imposed limits on political free speech, or individual ownership of firearms? If someone has a consistently argued libertarian argument for why the state should be allowed to torture individuals, I’d like to hear it. If someone has a libertarian argument, or indeed any argument at all, for why the state should be allowed to do this with no public scrutiny or accountability, I’d like to hear that even more.
The state? No. Now neighborhood associations of course have the right to torture people under the bylaws people agree to when buying a house.
This libertarian agrees with Henry.
The answer, I think, is that the political debate in America has devolved into a war between This Side and That Side. A lot of libertarians have, due to what seem like unresolvable disagreements with people on This Side like the Clintons, spent most of their lives on That Side.
When the leaders of That Side pursue more and more un-libertarian policies, it doesn’t matter. They’re on That Side, and the people opposing said policies are on This Side.
This Side, of course, is guilty of the same hypocrisy.
(Note I’m not a libertarian though I have such tendencies.)
(Further note, I don’t like torture)
The war on terrorism (as fought either by police or the military) is a good example of something that isn’t likely to be done well in a committed libertarian environment. Talking about torture victims ends up raising a host of issues that end up being difficult for libertarians to resolve. So perhaps they avoid focusing on these potential torture victims because they want to avoid talking about the war on terrorism.
I don’t know if it’s a reaction that mostly affects libertarians, it seems just to be affecting a lot more people…
It’s simply that when those “individuals” being tortured are defined as enemy or potential enemies, then it’s war and in war all is allowed and have you already forgotten 9/11 by the way.
That’s the kind of framework that makes indifference to torture fit in any kind of political position, libertarians or not. I guess, with those libertarians who embrace that reasoning, it’s a case of two liberties at war, and “our” (not mine! just speaking from that p.o.v.) liberty is threatened by “them” so our has to prevail even at the cost of “their” liberty. (Plus the constant sliding of “terrorist suspect” into “terrorist” and so, the assumption they deserve it anyway).
Or, it may be simply a case of, this is too shameful to deal with it. Better swept under carpet.
Also, very important: it hurts “our” PR and moral to dwell on these things and this may weaken our resolve and hence, endanger “our” liberty. So let’s not dwell on them.
Lastly: just a few bad apples.
Did I forget anything?
MC - Yes, I agree that this is not a problem that just affects libertarians. It’s just that one would expect - and hope - that libertarians would be volubly on the other side of the fence on this. It seems to touch on some of their core concerns after all.
Sebastian - I take it that you aren’t arguing here that libertarians’ silence on this is a good thing (I don’t think you are).
I’m a libertarian, and the reason I don’t talk much about the torture scandal online is that it makes me too angry to sound reasonable, and hence too angry to be effectively persuasive. Since I can retain my poise when criticizing (for example) the Bush administration’s position on the FMA, spending or trade, I preferentially talk about that, on the grounds that I am more likely to convince someone to not vote to reelect the President.
Yes, how could I forget: the liberal media are only pushing this story because it’s election year. And they hate Bush.
ie. the reaction known as “enough with this torture crap already, meanwhile our boys are dying in Iraq and why should we be nice to these animals?”.
Sorry, you were looking for a consistently argued argument excusing the right to torture. There just isn’t, and cannot, be one. Or maybe there could be, a consistent if, by necessity, totally amoral argument, but who would be excusing the argument itself? It’s be a short-circuit of apologies and would get you right back where you started.
henry - I know, I never meant to imply you were only referring to libertarians, and I wasn’t objecting to your point at all, actually. (And I’m not a libertarian). I understood what you mean there, and I agree. My thought was simply “if only the indifference was limited to libertarians”, but it wasn’t what you said that made me think that. It was just, observing how sad it is, really, that no one really seems to care about this as much as the issue deserves. Or, that this is being trickled in news bits now and then and yes causing outrage at some level but not really being discussed in a major way at political level, first of all.
As a borderline small l libertarian, I can tell you that I’m outraged. Adding the horrors of torture to the virtues of gridlock, I’m probably going to vote for Kerry, who I’m convinced will be a lousy President.
Nope, I’m not at all saying it is a good thing.
I thought the federal governement crossed the line of acceptability in the Waco Texas seige. I never understood why it got away with what seemed to be criminal activities.
Since it seems to be important to this discussion, I’ll declare my interest: I am not a libertarian since I don’t know what it means! If anyone would like to tell me what a libertarian is I’ll think about it. ;)
Jim Henley,IIRC, has always been firm in his opposition to the Iraq war. Libertarians give lip service to national defense, but when it gets into the details, for example, the draft, there are simply horrific conflicts and contradictions. I would suggest you check the foreign policy of current Lib party candidate, from whom many blogosphere “Libertarians” are running away.
It has been fairly comfortable to be a soft Libertarian since Reagan. Perhaps the Cowens and Volokhs are not quite “The Libertarian Wing of the Republican
Party” but they are also closer to it then they may have realized before 9/11. This ain’t so bad.
What I don’t understand is Conservatives and torture. The Pope opposes the death penalty, abortion, assisted suicide, the Iraq War, and I would safely guess he would oppose torture. This I can understand. Conservatives who treat the above as a smorgasboard, with some decisions based on transcendant values and some on utilitarian arguments, are more difficult to understand as an even partially coherent and principled political philosophy..
I think that Digamma’s This Side/That Side comment has a lot of merit. Too many libertarians got comfortable thinking of the Republicans as a reliable ally in the search for smaller government - never as true as any of us sometimes thought, of course. Then came the shock of 9/11, and libertarians were not immune to fear and rage. Indeed, a fair number may actually have been extra vulnerable precisely because of being so sure that their views were purely rational and logical. They lacked the healthy self-questioning that comes with an awareness of how emotion and reason intertwine. They can’t say, and may well not realize that they’re thinking, “I am so scared that I want Big Brother to keep me safe.”
We haven’t started torturing citizens yet, have we? I don’t think libertarianism is at all incompatible with torturing the people we’re torturing.
(Not that I’m defending libertarians or sadists; I just don’t think it’s the least bit confusing that a lot of people are both.)
War is horrible, killing is horrible, what makes torture worst than killing? At least you can justify it, you might get vital informations. Before I heard about the torture in Iraq, I knew it was already happening. When you want to win a war, you go for it!
When you kill kids and women just because they might carry a bomb, why torturing can’t be justified? I know why, it’s because war can’t be justified.
The real issue isn’t why are libertarians so silent, but why everyone is so silent about the US practice of torture. After the NYT reported on 13 May about ‘water-boarding’ on the front page (“Harsh C.I.A. Methods Cited In Top Qaeda Interrogations”), there was little sustained outcry. Even this blog never mentioned it, best I can tell. The CIA contractor who was indicted for assault in June was prosecuted because he killed an Afghan detainee, one who appears to have been uninvolved in any wrongdoing. But I have never heard the beating of Afghan detainees condemned. The problew was that this poor fellow got killed.
Sadly, this confirms the most paranoid views of libertarian extremists. Even the US government might torture you and the only consequences will be getting blogged at.
I don’t think libertarianism is at all incompatible with torturing the people we’re torturing.
Why? Are people from other countries not really soverign individuals in the same way that people from your own country are?
i am concerned about torture. yes.
it, however, escapes me that there are a great deal of people out there with a large concern beyond basic self-interest and issues on the fringe of that self-interest. sometimes i get stuck onto msn.com or yahoo.com and on the ‘news’ there are articles that are there solely to appeal for the citizen’s immediate self interest. the televised news and the class of self-help magazines seem to emphasize that the current advertising strategy is to appeal to the egocentricity of individuals and the companies seem to be doing pretty well with that. it would, therefore, strike me that there’s a lot of people out there who would not care about too much between getting out of their soul-sucking jobs and going to bed.
and if they happen to be concerned about it. the more common reactions i have heard is that individuals cannot make a difference, but is best left for the administration or the dream of becoming a decision holder in the administration - then they can think about it. kind of comparing themselves with people in the desert who stop thinking of food because there is none. it is great that people on this post seem to care about it. but i’m horribly guilty of having not done anything about it. you have obviously talked about it and raised awareness. what else have you done?
‘Do it to Julia! Do it to Julia! Not me! Julia! I don’t care what you do to her. Tear her face off, strip her to the bones. Not me! Julia! Not me!’
Room 101 isn’t particularly instructive for libertarians, since it’s essentially their starting point.
I think Kieran has it about right here. There are the libertarians, such as Jim Henley and an a very few others, and then there are the libertarianism-for-US-citizens-like-me -but-the-state-ought-to-stomp-on-the-head-of-everyone-else-ists. Sadly, most “libertarians” seem to be of the latter variety.
Why? Are people from other countries not really soverign individuals in the same way that people from your own country are?
They’re signatories to a different social contract. I suppose the mystical, Ayn Rand-style libertarians might have a problem with torture, at least logically, but I think they’re the ones most likely to enjoy the idea for non-philosophical reasons.
Sadly, for some people, “American” takes precedence over “human” or “individual”. So, when “American” interests are affected, human rights don’t apply. It’s not even that subliminal.
“This Side, of course, is guilty of the same hypocrisy.”
No, “This Side” doesn’t torture people, generally speaking . . .
I just thought, there are people who can actually be excused for not being that shocked at the news that the CIA used torture. In countries like Chile or Argentina or El Salvador, it’s just no news at all.
Meanwhile, they found Pinochet’s money… in a US bank. Oh what surprise.
CIA torture, Pinochet, oil prices going up… Now we only need an ABBA reunion and then it’s 70’s revival full on.
mc—Tremble!
(note—just because I’ll do anything for a cheap laugh does not mean I am not angry about torture. I am perhaps too angry for my own good.)
Matt: ah, but that’s not the original ABBA is it? not that I would mind them coming back for real. :)
It’d be one of the least horrible of 70’s comebacks.
If you were angry when you wrote that post on your blog, it only added to the incisiveness and it being so spot on. I have the opposite problem. Brevity forsakes me altogether when I get irritated. As someone will likely notice in other threads, er…
Ps - I wish I hadn’t followed your link, Matt, and read that line from Seymour Hersch about the “soundtrack of the boys shrieking”.
I hadn’t read about that yet. I didn’t think there could be anything a lot more shocking than what had already come out.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review