Useful site of the year, and it’s only January. Chris Lightfoot has (I think with a couple of his mates) put together this extremely useful site which will allow you to send a communication to your MP, free gratis and for nothing (Americans, spammers, and loonies1, you are out of luck I’m afraid and will need to wait for someone to invent a different service for you). It’s very useful for sending letters to MPs who don’t have readily available email addresses but (for example) helped sort out a parking ticket for you a couple of years ago and you want to say thank you. Or for that matter, if you want to ask them not to start any more wars, introduce ID card schemes. Or to suggest to them that the government is unlikely to do any better picking winners among immigrants than it did among nationalised industries. If your local MP (or MEP, MSP, etc) is a Tory or a LibDem, you can have a go at him or her too.
Personally, I think that democracy is basically doomed in the UK, but Chris still thinks it’s worth saving, so well done him for trying.
Footnote:
1Other than loonies who happen to live in the constituency of the MP they are trying to write to, I suppose.
It’s doomed, I agree. The world is too complicated.
“…a new Explorer window…” Do you mean Internet Explorer? That is sooo 2003.
Yeh. Got a problem with that?
(actually, I have now got my finger out, opened a new Explorer window and sorted the link out)
hmm… I wish someone would make a sort of community editable version that would allow for other countries, myself being a dual Aussie-US citizen, and since our politicians also seem to have a bad habit with wars, etc. Maybe I’ll have to do it myself if I ever get time.
And I thought I was the only person who actually prefered internet expoler over the alternatives.
http://voicesofreason.info
It’s still January where you live?
My own experience with the earlier FaxYourMP site and TheyWorkForYou.com has been overwhelmingly negative.
The sites are a brilliant idea but they rely on having MPs who actually pay attention. My experience over the past 3 or 4 years is that of the 4 or 5 attempts I’ve made to contact two different MPs is that in only one case was there even a reply and the reply was clearly a ‘form letter for sending to ID card nutters who worry about old fashioned and out-moded concepts like civil liberties’ thing that made no effort at all to address any of the specific questions raised.
I’m with Daniel on this one. Democracy as it stands in this country is basically screwed.
My earlier experiences (in the late 80s), when my MP was the marvellous Dennis Canavan, were much better - with Canavan following up my letter several times over a period of many months, forwarding on replies from Ministers and continually agitating on my behalf - despite the fact that I wasn’t even old enough to vote at the time. Unfortunately, MPs of the Canavan breed are increasingly thin on the ground.
Ah, but the good thing about this version is the access to councillors: it lets you fail to get traffic lights installed at the top of your road, as well as fail to stop the war in Iraq. Although some of the guidance starts to seem rather grand. “District Councillors will ignore copied and pasted ‘identikit’ messages”? How many will they get?
Matt McGrattan: Fax Your MP may well have had a disproportionate role in anti-ID card protests — it being a popular issue online — which would make it easier to ignore. Especially if they’re shoving back a form letter in the hope of rising in a rapid-response table. I’d write by hand (plain paper, dark blue ink). But I might do that anyway.
I’d be surprised if any MP actually paid attention to letters they got from this site; after all if someone can’t be bothered to actually write a letter (or pick up the phone and call), they can’t care all that much. Or at least that seems to be the consensus whenever a congressional staffer over here talks about this kind of thing.
JS: I warned you before not to leave off-topic comments consisting of essentially nothing but a link to your blog. That counts as spam.
The sites are a brilliant idea but they rely on having MPs who actually pay attention.
But FYMP/WTT does keep stats of the MPs’ responses. Which is a useful check on the lazier buggers.
Remember that FYMP was introduced to ‘hack’ democratic accountability, because MPs wouldn’t respond to emails. Some MPs even tried to weasel out of replying to FYMP faxes, saying that they needed a signature. Er, no.
(Disclaimer: a fair few of the people behind FYMP, going right back to the days of stand.org.uk, are good friends of mine, and are the most cantankerous bastards when it comes to knocking politicians into shape.)
The next stage is to create tools that make it easier for people to stand for election — say, ‘BecomeYourCouncillor’ — which has been taken up by Howard Dean in the US.
Jasper/Jake:
Yes, I think you’re both probably right in that the popularity of the ID card issue with the people who are likely to make use of such a site, and the nature of the site itself, may have made it easier for MPs to ignore.
However, that doesn’t excuse their ignoring it. It’s really not their job to make value judgements about a persons ‘seriousness’ based on the method they used to send their message to the MP [as opposed to the actual content of the message].
Nick: Yeah, the keeping of stats is a good thing. However, what do you do with those stats? My own MP has a response rate that doesn’t rise above 50%. I doubt it’ll make much difference to his election prospects.
That’s not to disparage the work of the people who produce the sites, of course.
Just to answer Jake McGuire’s point. You can’t compare US and UK on contacting elected representatives. In the US, as I understand it, it is common practice to spam congressmen with automatically copied messages, and they don’t complain much. Here they have always hated it, so FaxYourMP and WriteToThem both prevent copy and paste junk. The cultures are different.
Hopefully politicians will pay particular attention to WriteToThem messages, because we have pre-vetted and filtered them in many ways. We watch carefully for abuse. It’s much better than using the service on the parliament.uk website, which does no checks and gets lots of junk.
Yes, I think you’re both probably right in that the popularity of the ID card issue with the people who are likely to make use of such a site, and the nature of the site itself, may have made it easier for MPs to ignore.
There’s a historical reason, perhaps: FaxYourMP was born out of the Stand.org.uk campaign against ID cards, so MPs have been receiving faxes on that subject for much longer than other topics.
What’s done with the response stats? Well, there’s a regular name-and-shame, since it’s good press-release fodder for lazy hacks.
As for the US model: the size of the country, and of congressional districts, combined with DC lobby culture, means theres a very different relationship between congresscritters and their electorates. The weekend constituency surgery doesn’t really exist in the States; there’s also a much larger congressional staff to deal with. Chances are, if you’re writing to an old-school backbench MP, your message is seen by just a couple of people; though you’re right that things are getting more Americanised.
For the record, I believe the worst case of FaxYourMP form-letter spam was done on behalf of the RSPCA, of all people, during the hunting ban debates.
Some brief comments and clarifications:
“Although some of the guidance starts to seem rather grand. “District Councillors will ignore copied and pasted ‘identikit’ messages”? How many will they get?”
— oh, not many, I expect, but the text is the same as for all the different levels of representative. I’d be surprised if nobody tries a copy-and-paste campaign about some local issue at some point, so we decided to put a blanket warning in.
“Nick: Yeah, the keeping of stats is a good thing. However, what do you do with those stats? My own MP has a response rate that doesn’t rise above 50%. I doubt it’ll make much difference to his election prospects.”
— I’d hate to drag this debate onto electoral systems (along with Europe and asylum seekers, one of the strange attractors of British political debate) but yes, MPs with safe seats probably don’t care all that much. (I haven’t checked this.) But I believe that statistics from FYMP have been quoted in election campaign materials already.
“FaxYourMP was born out of the Stand.org.uk campaign against ID cards”
— no, in 1998 it was opposition to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (IIRC); the ID cards idiocy wouldn’t be with us for another six years. But I wasn’t involved at that stage. See Stef for a very potted history.
Gawd, I completely forgot about RIPA, or at least my rapidly degenerating memory conflated all of that nasty privacy stuff into one blurry mess. Stef will have my guts, next time I see him.
… it would be much easier if they’d just come out with the Privacy Stuff (Nasty) Bill (2005). Only one battle to fight….
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review