Following up a link from Iain Murray on mad cow disease and the threat it does or doesn’t pose to humans I came across a column on the subject by Steven Milloy “an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute” and proprietor of JunkScience.Com in the LA Times. Molloy is sceptical of the prion theory and reports of the British experience that:
Though laboratory testing seemed to indicate that BSE and variant CJD were similar, no one could determine with certainty whether and how the BSE epidemic was related to the “human mad cow” cases. There were no geographic areas in Britain with a significantly higher incidence of variant CJD cases, and there were no cases of variant CJD among apparently high-risk groups such as farmers, slaughterhouse workers and butchers.
Two minutes of googling found the report of the British government’s report into BSE and vCJD.
First on the matter of geographical clustering :
The 1999 Annual Report of CJDSU draws attention to the geographical distribution of cases of vCJD (see Figure 5.1, in which the data have been further updated) and shows that if the UK is divided into ‘North’ and ‘South’ regions, the rate per million individuals aged between 16 and 54, is 2.57 for the ‘North’ region and 1.30 per million individuals for the ‘South’.
Perhaps Milloy wants to place some stress on “significantly highter”?
What about occupational links? The British Government report again
Among occupational groups exposed to BSE, farmers remain unusual in having such an excess over the incidence of CJD for the population as a whole. No cases of CJD have been reported amount veterinarians exposed to BSE. Four people in the meat industry (butchers, abattoirs, rendering plants, etc) have been reported to have vCJD.
Note that the excess for farmers is accounted for by additional but unexplained cases of sporadic CJD (i.e. not vCJD). But what Molloy says about slaughterhouse workers and butchers “no cases” is directly contradicted by the Inquiry report.
I hasten to add that I have absolutely no expertise in this area but was struck my the apparent mismatch between what I read in the LA Times and my memory of the British outbreak.
Today’s London Times has an article by John Collinge , director of the Prion Unit at Britain’s Medical Research Council arguing that the threats to human health from the BSE/vCJD link may be great and that complacency on the basis of the small number of vCJD cases to date is misplaced.
I wish I could read that Times article. Is his argument the latency? But I thought that better slaughterhouse procedures would pretty much eliminate the threat. I mean, vCJD makes up a tiny fraction of CJD cases anyway.
I sure don’t worry about it. I’m confident that I’m much more likely to die from eating bacterial contaminated undercooked meat than I am of vCJD. And even more likely to die in an automobile crash. C’es la vie.
Sorry, perhaps that Times piece is inaccessible to those outside the UK. The $ paras:
We are used to infectious disease epidemics, such as influenza or foot-and-mouth disease, that arise and decline over weeks and months. However, we know from the disease kuru, transmitted among the Fore people in Papua New Guinea during cannibalistic feasts with devastating effects, that human prion disease epidemics can span decades with incubation periods that can exceed 40 years, with an average of around 12 years. We also need to think about the effect of the so-called “species barrier”. When prions from one species infect another species, the incubation periods seen are typically very much longer. Average incubation periods of BSE prions in human beings of 30 years or more would not be surprising based on such comparisons.
Probably you’re right Keith that better slaughterhouse procedures will eliminate the threat. Of course that’s no comfort to those of us who consumed large quantities of British steak and kidney pies in the 1980s!
Just out of interest, here’s a little figure I just made that illustrates why complacency about small numbers of cases of a disease can be dangerous. Note that I’m not drawing strong analogies between HIV and vCJD here, just showing why small numbers of cases over a period of years doesn’t mean there’s nothing to worry about.
Milloy is a hack. You can read more about him here.
I’m sure I remember there being a very localised BSE hotspot (in Leicestershire?) with a public report into it. I’ll Google.
Queniborough. See here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1233813.stm
Here is the (disputed) article from the British Medicinal Journal to which Milloy refers. If the diseases are in fact related the epidemics of BSE in the 1980s and the later vCJD should develop in a similar way; so far that hasn’t happened. The BBC reported last year that in Britain 28 people died of vCJD in 2000, 20 in 2001 and 17 in 2002. In short, I’m skeptical.
Venters’ hypothesis that vCJD is a previously unrecognized disease was also supported by something I read about the (mis-)diagnosis of normal CJD; apparently the number of cases of CJD has grown significantly in the 1990s, simply because doctors are better at recognizing it. But I can’t find a link for that so maybe I dreamed it.
So you have a difference of 1.3 per million and 2.6 per million. What that translates to, given Britain’s population of 60 million, is that you’re talking something in the area of 80 or so cases. Depending on how one draws one’s regions, it shouldn’t be too difficult to come up with a difference in occurrence rate. Reasonable people can differ on what is statistically significant in this case.
That said, it doesn’t really matter. People died from a mysterious and unexplained ailment. That’s reason enough for scrutiny, and statistically significant or not, one’s odds of finding the correct cause improve by honing in on correlating factors. It doesn’t prove anything, but it gives you a place to start looking.
Milloy is a hack. You can read more about him here.
Tim, that has to be one of the least impressive “debunkings” I’ve ever read.
It’s mostly a series of semantic games about the meaning of the word “science.” For example, it may be true that lawyers who try to get damage awards from cell phone manufacturers for post hoc brain cancers are not “doing science at all,” but they are making causal physical claims which require a theory behind them - that is to say, they are conjuring a scientific aura around their claims. That kind of conduct is certainly fair game. To complain that Milloy calls it “junk science” rather than, say, non-science or fake science is mere grumpery.
Much of the rest of it was taken up with “Why doesn’t Milloy write about this?” which is the sort of thing I’d expect from Glenn Reynolds talking about protestors.
Milloy may indeed be “a hack,” but you sure can’t tell it from the piece you cited. I’m somewhat surprised you seem so impressed with it.
Prions are interesting and may be part of normal protein functioning that goes wrong for several possible reasons such as old age or exposure to toxins of various sorts. The BSE scare has prompted a lot of work on a previously neglected area. There’s a fair amount of new and interesting research as well as an abundance of speculative writing.
oh well, then let’s put downer cattle back into the food supply.
(& Toxic waste is good for you too)
Those of us who habitually eat our ancestors’ brains are even more worried than the rest of you. It seemed like the proper thing to do at the time. Who knew?
From what I’ve read, prion formation seems like self-catalysis, where a molecule of a certain compound, when added to a bath of components of the same compound, catalyzes the reproduction of more and more replicas of itself. Is there someone out there who actually knows chemistry and can tell me whether my hunch has any validity?
It’s very hard to get used to a whole new kind of cause of disease — neither a living creature nor a virus nor a toxin (as we usually use the word), but something else entirely. My etiological universe has been discombobulated.
Zizka, a recent Economist has an article which not only describes prions much as you just did, but says that they may be part of memory, esp. long-term memory. (Not, I think, the same prions as the disease ones.)
This MIT release discusses it clew. This BioMedNet article is also interesting. Protein folding variation is being recognized as a common mechanism, an elegant low energy method for quick state changes. But, things can go wrong…
Degustibus is no doubt trying to be funny when he (she?) says that “Toxic waste is good for you too”, but in fact there is some evidence that small amounts of some toxic substances can be good for living organisms.
The effect is called “hormesis” and has been shown in many experiments on a wide range of organisms. There’s some evidence that low levels of radiation are also beneficial.
And one amusing detail. One of the toxic substances thought to be helpful is arsenic. The right level for humans may be about 50 parts per million, the old “safe” level in the United States. By embarrassing the Bush administration into lowering it, the Democrats and media may actually have made us worse off.
Please note that I said “may”, since I understand that the scientific study of hormesis is still in its initial stages.
Some substances are never good and bad above a certain dosage. Asbestos, lead and mercury are examples, IIRC. Others are good in small doses and bad in large. This second list includes almost everything — salt, water, carbohydrates. “Toxic substance” is a shorthand term of uncertain definition (I suppose it is legally defined somewhere, and maybe medically, but the legal and medical definitions don’t govern everyday use.)
What Miller’s post tells us is that some toxic substances are not in the mercury-lead toxic category, but the other one (with zinc, table salt, etc.). Also granting that the research is pretty preliminary, I doubt that we need to change the way we think about pollution in general yet.
Those of us who habitually eat our ancestors’ brains are even more worried than the rest of you. It seemed like the proper thing to do at the time. Who knew?
If zombie movies are to be believed (and certainly they are), the greater threat is our late ancestors’ eating OUR brains.
Jim, the difference between the Reynolds “why don’t they protest about X” argument and the critique of Milloy that I linked to, is that the protestors didn’t have a mission statement that implies they should be protesting about X. The only junk science that Milloy is critical of is that that does not suit his political agenda.
Milloy’s criticism of Levitt and Donohue’s abortion study could be also be applied to Lott’s MGLC study. You don’t even have to change any of the words. But he doesn’t criticize Lott’s work. In fact, he has articles praising Lott’s findings on his junk science site. I emailed him about this discrepency and his defence was that he didn’t write those articles. He is a hack.
It occurs to me that the mad cow thing is precisely the sort of situation where Tech Central Station’s ownership could become an issue and call their coverage into question.
I know of one column they’ve run, which if I’m not mistaken was one saying that it wasn’t anything to worry about. I don’t know if they’ve covered it more.
It would be interesting to know if TCS’s owners, the lobbying firm, have the beef industry as a client.
I think that if Milloy had seen at first hand what vCJD does he’d be less concerned about hammering the beef industry
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review