So David Blunkett has resigned . I felt pretty sympathetic to him concerning his private life, but let us all hope that his policy agenda departs with him.
“Anyone who says four times that he won’t resign, will” (Galbraith, endorsed by D-squared)
Was anybody counting?
Yes, I liked him less as Home Sec than as Ed Sec, even, but he never seemd dishonest, and I too had sympathy over his private life issues. But he has done well by resigning. Imagine, imagine, a member of a US Cabinet resigning over something like this.
Here’s a post about Blunkett’s scary attempt to make it a crime to say that Christianity’s kooky.
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/infocusprint.php?num=23&subject=Religious%20Hatred%20Law
I was counting, and including his statement on the lunchtime news, I make it a Galbraith score of 3 (once at the beginning of the whole thing, once in response to Diane Abbott and once today). Either there’s been structural change since the 1960s or Blunkett jumped the gun.
I have to say that I don’t share the sympathy about his private life; you lose basically all my sympathy when you send lawyers to harass a seven month pregnant woman. There is some room for hope regarding the policy agenda; Clarke is not short of bluster, arrogance or mindless populism, but I don’t think he actually hates people in the way Blunkett seemed to.
I think his policy agenda was misunderstood. My sister, who actually works for the met, told me ID cards would actually help a lot. As for all this nonsense about the new bill on religious hatred, if ever there was a storm in a tea cup it was this one. All it’s intended to do is put Islam on a par with christianity. It’s poorly written but that’s not what most of the complaints are about.
Good riddance to him.
Frankly couldn’t give a monkey’s about his personal life but his actions as Home Secretary have been unforgivable.
Unfortunately, I’d be very surprised if the authoritarian policy agenda changes. Blunkett after all was continuing, in a more enthusiastic manner, with the policy set under Jack Straw during his tenure as Home Secretary.
I’d imagine Peter Hain might be a natural choice as next Home Secretary. Good leftie credentials, perfect for ramming home the Blairite law and order agenda.
Can anyone name the last un-authoritarian Home Secretary? Hurd, perhaps? There certainly seems to be something about the Home Office that brings out the truncheon in politicians.
I do not feel sympathy for his attempts to wreck his ex-lover’s life, his obssession with getting what HE regards as HIS rights and dammn the consequences to anybody else; he reminds me of nothing as much as those clowns in Fathers for Justice.
He had a massive sense of entitlement only matched by his hypocrisy.
He was a crap home secretary, authoritarian, with more thought for the headlines than for good policy.
Good riddance.
While I didn’t agree with much of what he’s done, personally I have a lot of respect for the guy. Leaving aside the fact that he dragged himself up through an extremely difficult background, he was, from labors perspective a highly effective Home Secretary – responsible in part for putting Labor ahead of the Tories on home issues.
Although a lot of people are critiscing him for not being “liberal” enough, I think this misses the point. His policies probably played well in the “conservative” labor heartlands i.e. oop north and without him, the labor government, from Salford, probably looks a little overloaded with islington latte lads. I expect that the Lib Dems, and BNP, are going to scent some opportunities here.
I’d also add that fiddling your expenses is actually theft, which is not really a trivial crime, and a full fare first class train ticket is about a hundred quid. People do go to jail for this sort of thing, particularly if they’re members of the working class who Blunkett was so keen to talk about.
Speaking as one of the victims of this crime (ie, I pay UK tax), I wish that all those bloody Hampstead liberals who are keen to overlook it would think about the victim for a change. Tough on crime? …
Giles, do you have any figures to support the assertion that authoritarian policies are popular in the North of England?
I know you’re wrong about “Islington Latte Lads”. For one thing, you’re being pretty ignorant about the London Borough of Islington here; it’s no posher than Salford and contains some of the toughest estates in London (your Mancs would not last ten minutes down Green Lanes). For another, the Cabinet currently contains precisely two MPs for London constituencies (Tessa Jowell and Paul Boateng). Since we account for rather more than 10% of the UK’s population, I think this is actually pretty poor.
Aren’t memories short. Have you all forgotten dom Blunkett’s tenure in Sheffield and the fact (I know these are in short supply at CT) that his erstwhile constituency is still bleeding from his evangelical socialism.
Such short memories. The budget of Sheffield met council still bleeds it’s taxpayer’s money thanks to Dom Blunkett.
D^2
No figures, just speculation that the people who are most likely to be victims of crime are the poor and so the poor tend to favor policies that are much tougher on crime. I’m using North – South as a metaphor for this as opposed to an exact geographical delimitation.
However given that most of the media/informed comment is biased towards being London based and given that Blair is a reasonably canny operator, why has he hung on to Blunkett for so long? Perhaps because he realizes that Blunkett plays well in the out of the way poor parts of Britain in the North that aren’t regularly canvassed for their opinions by the media. Interestingly these are also the places where the BNP does quite well.
And Milbank long ago removed the link that a local MP actually had to be from the area.
Echo Martin Wisse’s comments on his private life.
But your hope that “his” policies will depart with him is forlorn. They are Home Office policies, not the property of any particular Home Secretary. I’m sure Charles Clarke (is that the new Home Sec?) will pursue them with the same vigour that Blunkett showed; ministers lose credibility with their civil servants if they don’t push the departmental line sufficiently strongly.
Hm I think attacking his policies is fair game especially given their mean-spiritedness but claiming that Blunkett’s move in attempting to get access rights to his children, even at the obvious price of his career, is somehow negatively a “massive sense of entitlement only matched by his hypocrisy” rather than a surprisingly brave and moral decision from a politician is puzzling. Please say you have never had kids yourself as ignorance is the only even semi-plausible excuse for that sentiment.
As for him and his relationship with Ms. Fortier, I dont think any of us can really comment on it given our lack of facts, let alone go so far as to say his motivation is to “wreck his ex-lover’s life,” even were that relevant.
Vik, do you not think that it might have been better to leave off the lawyers while Ms Fortier was in the final trimester?
your Mancs would not last ten minutes down Green Lanes
In the interest of science, I should point out that for the last two years, one of my best mates, a Manc, has lived on Green Lanes. He’s done just fine.
Re Blunkett, I was no fan of his heavy-handed policies, but on the personal level I think the chivalry being shown to Kimberly Quinn is more than a bit misplaced. If it’s BLunkett’s child, he has every right - and indeed a duty - to know and raise it. His desire to do so doesn’t make him a Fathers 4 Justice-type freak, and perhaps those who are condemning him for wanting to know his son should ask themselves what they would do in the same situation. If your answer is “walk quietly away from the child”, and you think that’s the moral response, well…
(And to those who feel that the cuckolded husband should be left to raise the child with the cheating spouse, with “Uncle David” visiting once a year with nice pressies for his “favourite godson”, how do you know that said husband wouldn’t have eventually found out, etc, possibly leaving the child in a particularly bad lurch? Given Kim Quinn’s track record, I wouldn’t opt for maritable bliss as my default position estimate.)
Re a possible return (surely it’s not too early in the news cycle to talk about that) I think it’s highly likely. Labour likes having a hard man who can appeal to the Daily Mail crowd; Blunkett fulfilled that role, and as soon as Labour start losing points to the Tories, I think they’ll bring him back in to shore up their “tough on criminals and brown-skinned immigrants” credentials.
Oopos - that’s Fortier, not Quinn. Where’s my coffee?
Bye bye to the third-most evil man in mainstream British politics at the moment (behind Darth Howard and Kilroy-Silk). As has been commented, we will probably still end up with ID cards, which is a Bad Thing IMHO.
dsquared,
Yes that is a very good point…i think he should have waited until after the birth to go to the courts but i was under the impression that he had launched the whole court saga before it was known that she was pregnant..I’m not sure about that though but in either case, emotion has definitely won out over reason on both her and his sides in my opinion…
as to blunkett’s return prospects, i am conflicted about this. on the one hand, the manner in which he has left seems ridiculous and in need of correction but then again his policies are pretty obnoxious to say the least…maybe it would be better if he was put in charge of something where he couldnt do much damage if he returns though i can’t say offhand what that would be…
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review