For a few years in graduate school I wrote a regular column for the Daily Princetonian, Princeton’s main student newspaper. I got into a bit of trouble once or twice over it, notably for a piece I wrote out of irritation with the local chapter of the Campus Crusade for Christ.
I was reminded of this when I learned, via Billmon, of the strong Christian beliefs of General Counsel Mary Walker. She led the legal team that wrote the recently leaked memo arguing that there were no legal considerations, domestic or foreign, that prevented the President from authorizing torture. She is also a co-founded of the Professional Women’s Fellowship, an offshoot of the CCC. Philip Carter at Intel Dump has described the memo as ‘a cookbook approach for illegal government conduct’. Here is Walker in an interview about her beliefs, followed by a snippet of her report:
Walker: “Making moral decisions in the workplace where it is easy to go along and get along takes courage. It takes moral strength and courage to say, ‘I’m not going to do this because I don’t think it’s the right thing to do.’”
The report: Officials could escape torture convictions by arguing that they were following superior orders, since such orders “may be inferred to be lawful” and are “disobeyed at the peril of the subordinate.”
With just a little more effort here, we could push through to the world of Jack Lint, the character played by Michael Palin in Brazil.
Update: The Walker interview was yanked from the Professional Women’s Fellowship website, in a Christian act of covering up embarrassing stuff. But Billmon has a copy.
Ow… Head hurts… Make it stop…
Gawd, I wish I’d written that CCC column when I was in college. I’m sure whatever trouble was caused was worth it.
All Hail the Great Kitty! Mysterious are His ways! Quail, false pet-owners, before His righteous feline wrath!
Excellent column — motivated by irritation or otherwise. I assume that you did not get “in trouble” with anyone who was actually thoughtful about the subject?
Kitty loves me this I know, because his thump into my lap tells me so.
What makes you think that Walker doesn’t just think that toruring darkie non-christians is the “right thing to do”? That would smooth it all out to her, wouldn’t it?
(The old news column is quite funny, too.)
Save us from the true believers
Really didn’t see how the Campus Crusade for Cats was supposed to be a reductio until I got to the part about women and…. brrr…. Andrew Lloyd Webber. I’m starting a splinter movement that says it’s heretical to set Scripture to music, at least crap music.
Your description of the ad doesn’t make it sound like CCC is calling Moslems liars. Do Moslems claim that “all roads lead to God”?
Actually, at MIT there is a group called the Campus Crusade for Cthulu that used to throw some pretty OK parties. There are chapters at other schools too.
Questions about bare minimum to get into Heaven and what’s the door policy very very good indeed. Well done (thou good and faithful etc).
So - communion with Meow Mix? Genuflection replaced by the rubbing of cheeks against pews? Singing of hymns replaced by discreet spraying?
Not quite sure what the point here is supposed to be. One thing about Christianity is that it actually predicts that even its most ardent practitioners will fail to live up to its moral demands. So what’s the surprise?
It’s quite sound to criticize Mary Walker for writing a report legitimizing torture. But your post reads as if you think it’s some sort of sound criticism of Christianity. Yet Christianity, rightly understood, forbids torture: one cannot do evil so that good may result. So again, I’m not quite sure what your point is.
Ophelia Benson wrote:
“Questions about bare minimum to get into Heaven and what’s the door policy very very good indeed.”
Unlike those in CCC, I’m not an Evangelical Christian, but I’m surprised that they didn’t reply to Kieran’s query by citing something like Romans 10:9. (That’s typically the response I got from my Evangelical friends when I was in college.) Maybe the students at this “different university” were exceptionally dim. Or maybe they didn’t feel like responding to someone who only seemed intent on ridiculing them.
Tacit commonality: dedication to truth.
And the goal of that would be: survival.
Of: us.
Only it’s becoming uncomfortably clear that “us” is no longer a whole-system term. “Us” is now a group-subjective local definition.
So we have the long-term goal being survival of a particular group to which “we”(meaning me and you) may or may not belong; in this case - CCC and Mary Whozis - not.
But everyone’s still clinging to the tacit assumption that the truth is the final arbiter. Conferring, as it once did in the completely artificial landscape of the educational system that shaped most of our world-views, an implicit superiority, once it can be demonstrated. But sadly, no.
Survival itself is the final arbiter, kids, not the truth.
Lying to survive is very common in the natural world, from whence cometh the very divisory “Darwinian” amoralities so disturbing to the fundamentalist religious groups in question.
What difference does it make if you can prove they’re wrong intellectually, if they don’t care?
Because they don’t, at all. They care not one whit if they’re wrong about this or that, if not caring means they survive.
And that’s the real goal. For all of us.
Banding together around a core of nonsensical gibberish has just as much evolutionary validity as selfless dedication to the-truth-at-all-costs, more if it provides a leg up in the clinch. Fangs and claws, guns and ammo, bombs and electrodes; or inspirational rhetoric concerning human rights… You decide.
So the question then becomes, who gets the evolutionary advantage: self-hypnotizing zealots with bomb-proof delusional beliefs, or snarky pragmatists with no fundamental social cohesion?
E pluribus unum, baby.
In case anyone’s wondering about n.w.’s verse:
Romans 10
9That if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
This makes the whole aggressive attempt to convert seem rather misplaced. Heaven requires no action, just an accurate statement of sincere belief. Of course, some blowhard calling Muslims liars seems pretty unlikely to change anyone’s sincere, heartfelt beliefs.
djw wrote:
“Heaven requires no action, just an accurate statement of sincere belief.”
According to Romans 10:9, that sincere belief needs to be that Jesus is Lord and that God raised him from the dead.
“Of course, some blowhard calling Muslims liars seems pretty unlikely to change anyone’s sincere, heartfelt beliefs.”
Sorry to be repetitious, but it sounds to me like the CCC’ers were calling those who say “all roads lead to God” liars. Do Moslems believe that all roads lead to God?
Yeah the line about Moslems should really be about ecumenical types.
Though the point still holds that it’s obnoxious to call them liars.
n.w.,
According to Romans 10:9, that sincere belief needs to be that Jesus is Lord and that God raised him from the dead.
Well, yes, I can read. I didn’t say any sincere belief.
Sorry to be repetitious, but it sounds to me like the CCC’ers were calling those who say “all roads lead to God” liars. Do Moslems believe that all roads lead to God?
I don’t know, you’ll have to ask them. Many of them probably not. Look, that wasn’t my point. If we assume that Romans 10:9 is absolutely correct, that leaves open the question, how do we get the heathens on board? My suggestion is simple—give ‘em the good stuff first. The stuff about God’s unconditional love, a community in Christ, etc. Then, once they’re hooked, you can slip it to them that they have to be intolerant blowhards w/r/t other religious traditions. It just seems like it would work better that way.
Normally I don’t go to lengths to mock religion like this, but the CCC always brought that urge out in me. Not the other Christian groups on campuses, btw. The CCC were so committed to social martyrdom and publicity stunts designed to offend (at least on my campus, and perhaps Princeton) that it’s hard to imagine they didn’t drive more people away from Christianity than they brought to it. But boy, did they get to feel superior.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review