Joseph Cirincione and Alexis Orton at the Carnegie Endowment have just put out a very useful short analytic brief on Iraq’s putative efforts to obtain uranium in Niger.
Their conclusion:
The numbers tell us that Iraq’s alleged interest in Niger uranium - even if true - never represented an immediate or significant threat to the United States. Simple math and common sense confirm that the claim should never have appeared in administration statements as evidence of an Iraqi nuclear weapon program.
“The numbers tell us that Iraq’s alleged interest in Niger uranium - even if true - never represented an immediate or significant threat to the United States.”
If true, Iraq’s interest in Niger’s uranium showed that Saddam was not abandoning his nuclear program. Which, unless you believe that intelligence services could catch every single attempt, means that he was a significant threat to the United States. The problem was the fact that even under the strictest sanctions that the international community could tolerate, Saddam was still willing to pursue nuclear weapons.
Which, unless you believe that intelligence services could catch every single attempt, means that he was a significant threat to the United States.
You could read the previous paragraph in the original document, but then that wasn’t the point you were trying to make, was it?
Even on a much smaller scale, French, international or U.S. authorities would certainly have detected such activity-especially after Niger signed a comprehensive safeguards agreement with the IAEA in June 2002.
Which is extra-fantabulous until you realize that Saddam might try avenues that might not include Niger.
Whoa, dude. I am, like, totally rethinking that whole war thing now.
There’s a great deal of testimony from captured prisoners at Abu Ghraib that Saddam was praying daily to Allah to have yellowcake dropped into Iraq by a passing UFO. You certainly can’t rule out the possibility…
Interestingly enough, this point was made by the CIA in its original analysis.
Funny, that.
fyrefly,
You should never underestimate the amount of cunning and deception of the treacherous Saddam and his Baathist followers. The score is still 12.000 pages of lies vs. a powerpoint presentation of unmistaken facts.
Still funny reading that speech. Complaining that Saddam didn’t arrest Zarqawi - “we passed details that should have made it easy to find Zarqawi” - but then when Saddam was gone, it suddenly wasn’t that easy to find him anymore.
How is evidence that he couldn’t have succeeded in getting everything he needed from one place evidence that the threat was unimportant? Since no one ever claimed he got any yellowcake from Niger, why should it matter how much he could have gotten? Wasn’t the only thing this claim was used for a statement about intention? Does anyone doubt his intention?
Well, if bad intentions are the sole basis for war, then fab-o, that will pass muster. But intention is a pretty low bar to set, and I’m not really sure that is a workable criterea for pre-emptive war. In the case of going to war to prevent “a smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud,” size does matter. Intention without means does not an immediate threat make. Or even a “gathering” threat. “Intent” matters in murder cases where the crime has already been committed, and where the law recognizes the difference between a planned and a spontaneous act. It does not extrapolate well to the foreign policy level. This is a “minority report” scenerio- claiming to have prevented something because the intent has been read. But who’s floating in the bathtub seeing the future?
In response to jf: Well, if bad intentions are the sole basis for war, then fab-o, that will pass muster. But intention is a pretty low bar to set, and I’m not really sure that is a workable criterea for pre-emptive war. In the case of going to war to prevent “a smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud,” size does matter. Intention without means does not an immediate threat make. Or even a “gathering” threat. “Intent” matters in murder cases where the crime has already been committed, and where the law recognizes the difference between a planned and a spontaneous act. It does not extrapolate well to the foreign policy level. This is a “minority report” scenerio- claiming to have prevented something because the intent has been read. But who’s floating in the bathtub seeing the future?
In response to jf: Well, if bad intentions are the sole basis for war, then fab-o, that will pass muster. But intention is a pretty low bar to set, and I’m not really sure that is a workable criterea for pre-emptive war. In the case of going to war to prevent “a smoking gun in the form of a mushroom cloud,” size does matter. Intention without means does not an immediate threat make. Or even a “gathering” threat. “Intent” matters in murder cases where the crime has already been committed, and where the law recognizes the difference between a planned and a spontaneous act. It does not extrapolate well to the foreign policy level. This is a “minority report” scenerio- claiming to have prevented something because the intent has been read. But who’s floating in the bathtub seeing the future?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review