Brian Leiter has two interesting posts up (one two) on the question of whether academics should be able to claim scholarly credit for blogging. It is fairly clear that good blogging should count as service. Indeed in all my recent self-promoting activities I’ve been plugging my work on various blogs as a service both to the public and the profession. But whether this counts as scholarly work is a tougher question.
I’m mostly in agreement with Brian’s position that the standards in the blogosphere are too loose to justify calling our posts scholarship. One reason this is not likely to change anytime soon is that the posts reflect the lack of standards. Most of what I write for blogs barely deserves to be called a first draft. Others I know are more careful, but I suspect there are very few bloggers who take as much care over their blog posts as they would over passages in a journal article.
On the other hand, it’s certainly possible that scholarship is advanced by our efforts on blogs, especially when blogs are used to trial genuinely new ideas. And if anyone wants to give me a pay raise on the basis of blog work, I won’t let my principles get in the way! But it will be a long time before I start listing any especially good blogposts on my CV.
i have total blogarrhea, myself.
I take solace in the fact that nevertheless I am much more lucid and consistent than Andy, Glenn, et al.
A well researched essay should count as much on a blog as it does anywhere else.
Would anyone like to comment on the academic or scientific status of the papers on the preprint archives? http://arxiv.org for example.
I don’t think of it in the narrow sense as scholarship, for the most part. I do occasionally publish more scholarly work through my web pages, but my blog is not a journal article. It’s written quickly, often carelessly, by comparison to what I would put into the crafting of a scholarly work.
However, I would regard the blog as part of my larger sense of myself as a scholar, as part of what I think the ways that being a scholar ought to be or can be a form of being an intellectual in the broader sense. If someone wants to assess me overall as a scholar, whether it’s my institution or some other body, I’d insist that they ought to incorporate a reading of my blog and now my work at Cliopatria into that (as well as my syllabi and teaching). It’s not just service—it’s a form of connecting scholarship to the public sphere, which I think is also a part of scholarship itself, or ought to be.
In the end, the discussion is really about how academic institutions weight the different things that scholars do, and about the unwholesome weight that a particular kind of formal publication is given. If I were trying to assess someone as a scholar, I’d like to give equal weight to things like: presentations at conferences, the circulation of unpublished work, blogging, presentations to public groups, teaching as a form of scholarly inquiry, op-ed pieces in newspapers, peer review work, grant screening, and so on—all work that gets classed as “service”, but I think is integral to being a scholar in the best sense of the term.
There are scholarly blogs that I think even qualify as scholarship in the narrow sense, where most of the posts are actually small review essays with fairly specific disciplinary character. Those actually ought to sit on the part of the c.v. with journal articles and books, as publications.
I’ve written about this a bit myself in response to some posts by Stephen Bainbridge. While I agree that the best blog posts are often scholarly in the broad sense, I agree with BW that they are more akin to “service” than to a journal article. While blogs are “peer reviewed” in the sense that they are met with swift and immediate scrutiny in the comments section and/or responses on other blogs, they’re not peer reviewed in the sense of having to withstand that scrutiny beforehand.
That said, I tend to think good blogs are more valuable than all but the most celebrated true scholarship. As I’ve noted before, Crooked Timber and similar sites are read by far more people than are most journal articles—and they’re not just consumed by a tiny group of people already expert in the subject matter.
I agree with a lot of the points Tim makes. The division of our work into “scholarship” and “service” is fairly artificial, and it was possibly wrong of me to buy into it without a few more qualifications.
On the point that some good blog entries really are of scholarly quality, there’s no law against turning your own blog entries into journal articles. Indeed, I’ve been living off that strategy for 18 months now. I’d like to hear more from people who work in the relevant areas, but I think that’s one way that ArXiv postings are judged - the good ones do eventually end up in traditional journals.
I see blogs as more of a training ground for writers of all types. Giving somebody credit for posting something on a blog is like giving a baseball team a free point because somebody hit a home run during practice.
Besides, if a blog post is that good, just send it to a more traditional outlet for proper credit. It’s not like you’re gonna get in trouble for plaigarizing yourself.
To me this is sort of a non-story. It comes down to two questions:
Q. Is blog writing good enough?
A. Usually not, maybe sometimes.
Q. Will the good blog writing be properly recognized?
A. Probably rather slowly, and there will be bitter-enders.
Of course, there’s question 3:
Q. How good is most writing in journal articles?
A.?….?
Conceivably blogs could end up being the place where new ideas are developed, since publication takes so long. I remember from reading about chaos theory, that a lot of the work had been done before anything was formally published. The chaos collective was a local face-to-face group, but blogs (as the internet frequently does) could make it possible for geographically-decentered groups to work together.
I think it’s quite possible that dead-tree publication might end up being some sort of ritualistic fossil. Of course, that’s electronic publication and not blogging.
Did Socrates get “scholarly credit” for chattering away in the marketplace?
Or was his eye fixed on higher things?
I think that one of the great arguments in favor of blogs-as-scholarship is precisely the slow publication cycle of journals. It ought to be the premier place where meaningful conversations about new articles or ideas or arguments take place. Of course, I also think that digital publishing in general reveals how utterly idiotic the current situation with journals is—academics don’t publish to make money, they publish to make reputation capital, meaning that they have every reason in the world to want to move to a medium that allows the rapid and cheap circulation of their work. Peer review networks are utterly transportable to digital media given that they’re all volunteer to begin with. But even if all that were to happen, digital peer-reviewed publication and blogs would still be different. Blogs might be where we talk first about what’s happening in our fields; peer-reviewed outlets where we talk in a more considered, research-heavy manner about what our fields actually are and do.
‘academics don’t publish to make money, they publish to make reputation capital, meaning that they have every reason in the world to want to move to a medium that allows the rapid and cheap circulation of their work.’
Yeah - that works well for Butterflies and Wheels, for example. People have published with us and been quite stunned (and delighted) at what a lot of readers they get. Their deans are happy, too.
Electronic publishing is good.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review