The Guardian has a readable and disturbing piece about what happens if you try to fake your way into a mental instutution:
In 1972, David Rosenhan, a newly minted psychologist with a joint degree in law, called eight friends and said something like, “Are you busy next month? Would you have time to fake your way into a mental hospital and see what happens?”
Lauren Slater reports on the extreme hostility this researcher faced when he published and since, on the fact that his fellow inmates could tell he was sane even when the doctors couldn’t, on how he wrote down his experiences and had this labelled as “writing behavior” (which I suppose it was). But what would happen if you tried to do the same thing today? Slater tried ….
Fascinating article, great link. The article isn’t as disturbing as all that, though, as Slater’s verdict on modern psychiatry is much kinder than on the 1972 version targeted by the original experiment. Reading the article actually imparted some hope that there has been some progress and that the psychiatric profession has been striving for progress rather than just running in place, even though they face new temptations in the form of medication.
Dang, that is a fascinating article. The whole thing raises so many teasing questions. Labeling shapes what we find, sure - but what follows from that? Depends. Some labels are worthless, some are fake, some are useful but not always relevant - and so on. Such is life.
There is a fine Dickensian finish to the second article; the daughter sickening, the old man recovering. Just the thing to make people run out and buy the book to read the sequel.
As a patient, I have to add my anecdotal two cents that whatever has happened in psychiatry in the past 30 years, the net effect is for the better. I don’t necessarily say that fewer people are being misdiagnosed, but that those who are correctly diagnosed feel subjectively better and integrate into society more quickly with today’s treatments than with those of the 1970s.
This may be an oversimplification, but I give most of the credit to the advances in psychopharmacology. Because, at least to a rationalist, mental states are rooted in biology. And despite the fact that doctors may rely upon meds as panacea as much as the patients do, at least the meds can be stopped or altered if they are inappropriate. And it’s quite likely that one of these days we really will know it all. Better living through chemistry, I always say.
As asg above, I found the article did offer some hope that better pharm science may have mitigated some of the worst effects of errant and arrogant pseudo-scientific psychiatry.
But the pseudo-science and the monkey tribe behavior of pseudoscientiests is still a fearsome weapon in the hands of artful and designing persons.
In classical slashdot format, here is how it works.
1. Desire relative’s property.
2. Make up and report relative’s “odd and possibly self-harmful behavior” to state authorities.
3. State will institutionalize relative, at gunpoint.
4. Profit!! (unless a small army of civil libertarians and lawyers happens to help the victimized relative.)
If you don’t believe this is remarkably easy for vicious schemers to bring off, just google for “Roby Ridge” (that’s ROBY, not RUBY).
Psychiatry is getting a bit of a bum rap from these experiments. I have to imagine that if I went to eight emergency rooms with a fictitious complaint of back pain, I would consistently walk out with a prescription for a muscle relaxant. Mmmmmm…muscle relaxant.
Slater does seem to have an axe to grind. Her statement that the drive to prescribe “does seem to be more a product of fashion, or fad” strikes me as unfair; one could just as easily say that it arises from a genuine desire to help sick people. It seems to reasonable to me to believe that the doctors are prescribing antipsychotics because, in cases where someone really is hearing voices, those antipsychotics have frequently proven to be helpful. Sure, there’s a risk of a false positive based on deceptive behavior by the patient, but it’s hard to see how that risk could be minimized without then producing a lot of false negatives (i.e., truly sick people turned away).
Slater seems to have little empathy for those who are genuinely sick. Certainly, the term “thud” sounds cartoonish and risible to us, but a statement that “aliens are controlling my brainwaves” would sound just as laughable if we weren’t used to hearing that sort of thing from schizophrenic people. Slater particularly angered me when she belittled the patient who was troubled by a voice continually repeating “It’s OK.” Her remark that “a voice saying, ‘It’s OK’ sounds pretty OK to me,” is feckless and really just mean.
There is also a lurking institutional conflict. To put the matter in commercial terms, Rosenhan and Slater, as psychologists, are competing for much the same patient business as psychiatrists. A finding that criticizes psychiatry for making errant diagnoses or over-prescribing drugs fully serves the competing interests of psychologists, who cannot make medical diagnoses or prescribe drugs.
So others don’t have to: As suggested, I googled “Roby Ridge.” What resulted was a stack of tendentious websites describing an incident whereby a woman barricaded herself in her home and fired on police rather than obey a court order for a psych exam. She held off police for several weeks with the threat of further violence, before finally being removed safely from her home. The psych exam was then carried out, and it found no basis for committing her.
This doesn’t strike me as an especially abusive exercise of state power, and someone who shoots at police officers doesn’t seem like a desirable poster child.
Tom hit several nails on the head with both his posts. I have to chime in with another two cents (and I know that no-one gives tuppence for my two cents, but what the hey).
During my divorce in 2001, my doctor and I agreed that I would voluntarily enter a psychiatric hospital. Diagnosis: acute dysphoric mania. He called the place and made arrangements.
So I got to the hospital and they refused to let me check in unless I paid a deposit of $5000, because I’m not insured! So I went home.
Welcome to America. Oh, if only I’d known the magic word, “Thud.”
(PS >> Yes, there is a county-run hospital for emergency cases. But really.)
The story has some interesting parallels to Sam Fuller’s excellent film “Shock Corridor” where a struggling journalist who is determined to win the fame and recognition decides to go undercover in a lunatic asylum to expose a murderer of one of the inmates. He gets himself committed after repeated coaching by a former psy who teaches him to mimic incestuous feelings towards his false sister (in reality his girlfriend) in order to get admitted and ‘fool’ the doctors; a feat which is demonstrated to be a considerable obstacle. Once in the asylum he meets the various inmates, all of whom show some sort of wider sickness in society at the time: the victim of anti-Communist and then Communist brainwashing, a physicist who worked on the atomic bomb and the first black cadet into a military academy suffused with racism who cracks under the pressure and imagines himself to be a member of the KKK. The journalist gets more and more sucked in and eventually writes his story and wins his Pulitzer but is rendered insane by the experience and doesn’t recover.
Fuller was a very depressing film-maker, in many ways.
Psychiatry suffers in comparison to the rest of medicine partly because people don’t realize how uncertain any medical diagnosis is and how little we really know. As tom t. guesses, there’s a whole host of symptoms a pseudopatient could present in a conventional ER which would be taken at face value. Of course they would. It’s not normal to hear a voice say “thud”. It’s also not normal to suffer continual abdominal pain. And for the most part, the physician can only take your word for it.
I think the real insight in Slater’s experience is that while we may be little more confident of a correct diagnosis today than in 1972, mental patients are more likely to be treated with dignity and compassion than they were thirty years ago. That’s a big change.
An aside: a few years ago I was suicidally depressed and was admitted to a mental ward on two occasions for about a week each. I got very good care, although I didn’t get much better via anything other than time. I actually have very fond memories of the place, because, I think, it was a safe place where people were very concerned about me. And the rest of the world “stopped”—I didn’t have to worry about anything other than figuring out how to want to be alive. 80% of the patients were women, and 95% were acutely depressed. We patients were also very concerned and supportive with each other, which was also very helpful. This was the largest part of the good the stay does for most people, I think—it indicates that (at least with depressed people) a lot could be done with non-medical support and “safety nets” for people in crisis.
Thank you for finding such a great article.
Great article. I’m an academic pediatric emergency physician and I share her concern for the apparent overuse of antipsychotic and antidepressive medications. Patients feigning any number of illnesses will leave the emergency department with medications because physicians are taught to listen to the patient, and over 80% of diagnoses come primarily from the history. In my opinion the threshold for prescribing antidepressives or antipsychotics should be higher than muscle relaxants or analgesics, but my frequent use of those meds makes me more comfortable with them. Psychiatrists get very comfortable with their meds.
Primum no nocere, first do no harm, is a dictum of the past. Physicians today are inclined to treat rather than observe in the abscence of certainty. Most would rather commit an error of commission than an error of omission. At least s/he tried. There are many reasons for this, one of which is the perceived threat of litigation.
I’m sure everybody knows this, but hearing voices is absolutely not normal, and a sure sign of paranoid schizophrenia - a very dangerous disease. People with it are prone to hurt themselves or others. It doesn’t normally just go away. Anyone not taking the symptom “hearing voices” seriously would be negligent. I’m surprised that she wasn’t admitted everytime, even against her will. But they did prescribe a antipsychotic, which is non-narcotic and not particularly dangerous. They then made sure she should follow up. I don’t think the psychologists overreacted at all - I’d say the opposite. It’s strange to me that the article suggests otherwise.
Qutie a coincidence that this topic came up. Just yesterday I was reading Gulag by Anne Applebaum, and was fascinated by the ways in which prisoners faked symptoms to get hospitalized. The gulag administration then developed counter-strategies to discover which prisoners were faking.
Although many prisoners faked schizophrenia, administrators found that the easiest way to “out” fakers was to put them in a ward with real schizophrenics. The fakers would beg to be let out within a few hours. Another strategy was to fake paralysis. Doctors would then put the patient on an operating table and anaesthetize him. When the patient woke up, he would get off the table and start walking before remembering that he was supposed to be faking paralysis at which would point he would fall to the floor.
I would highly recommend Gulag by the way for anyone interested in the history of the much overlooked concentration camps of Soviet Russia.
Tom T and tcb, very interesting comments. I get the same feeling as Tom about Slater’s “bias”, so to speak.
She wrote one too many books on her own “success story” and I tend to think one would have sufficed. Also, she wrote an entire one in praise of Prozac, so I don’t get exactly what her point about medication and diagnosis is…
I’m ambivalent about her whole story, as well as the original experiment/prank in the sixties. On the one hand, it is a great read, thought-provoking, and, also, funny. On the other, I don’t think playing this sort of “jokes” is very respectful of people who are really suffering, or of the work of doctors and nurses. There are all kinds - good ones, bad ones, so-and-so ones, but what do you expect if you’re just faking it?
You can’t assess the quality of psychiatric care by pretending to have a disorder. You need to really have one, to be able to tell if you’re getting good or bad treatment. You may also need to try out different places, different doctors, different methods. I’d have thought someone who went through problems like Slater did would have know that already, without needing this sort of thing.
So these experiments alone really don’t prove much, because they alter the whole premise, that the person seeking therapy is really suffering from an illness, a disorder, a temporary crisis. They only prove you can fool a doctor, well, doh. This is not about measuring fever or blood pressure. That a doctor will take a person claiming to suffer from delusions at her word, is only proof they’re listening to the patient. Not a bad start, for a psychiatric therapy.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review