This isn’t exactly a news story, but David Brooks’s latest column is bizarre even by his distinctive standards. Is it meant to be biography? Autobiography? Fantasy? The mind boggles. Here’s the most charitable explanation I can come up with. “I’m a conservative columnist and it’s a week until election day. So I should like write an argument for voting for the conservative. But I can’t think of a !@#$%^& reason for doing so, or at least one that passes the giggle test. So I’ll just doodle on the page for 760 words and hope my reputation isn’t too tattered when this is all over.”
How unfunny is it? The idea could have been done better by Art Buchwald, that’s how unfunny it is.
I sincerely hope this was an attempt to insult some friend of his.
To consider otherwise turns me melancholy.
References to the private polling are like the neutron bombs of political discourse - quiet but devastating.
I’m praying that Brooks actually meant to sneak a “silent-but-deadly” fart reference past the OpEd page editors.
Dead accurate assessment.
How dead? I couldn’t finish it.
But I did find this interesting sentence before I quit it:
He alone can captivate a gathering, while men hang eagerly on his words and women undress him with their eyes.
Brooks apparently learned female sexuality from dime novels. I suspect he once beat off furiously to Harold Robbins. Maybe still does.
In summary: Wholly wretched—the misshappen thing should have been condemned to a condom.
I’m inclined to believe that this is the first instance of troll using the mass media to go searching for victims.
I actually think it’s kind of funny, though I really do wonder if this is the best he can do with the NYT Op-Ed real estate.
on the contrary, I think this is his way of letting us know he is sane
cause you know the arguments from the punditocracy and talking point morons are going to get more and more hysterical (and by post election standards totally insane) as we run up to election day.
He’s just phoning it in. And when someone’s bad when he’s on form, that doesn’t make for a satisfying read.
who’s Art Buchwald?
The guy needs a career change. He’s dipping his toes into the shallow pool of supermarket paperback literature.
The pundit should allow a forgiving smile to play upon his lips before riposting, “Yes, I can see why you would have thought that, but the campaigns’ private polling suggests otherwise.” References to the private polling are like the neutron bombs of political discourse - quiet but devastating.
One expects a candle-lit assignation, a provocative description of lingerie, and a vague evocation of some sort of climax.
What have you got against Art Buchwald?
Is it true that “during the cold war, only 38 percent of voters knew that the Soviet Union was not a member of NATO”?
It’s not working. Why can’t we have a constitutional monarchy like Kuwait or Jordan instead of all this nonsense? King Abdullah looks like a decent and smart guy.
abb1 says: […] King Abdullah […]
I like his tvtome page better:
“King Abdullah is a huge Star Trek fan and often enters forums under an alias to have a good discussion “
I’ve read many a more sensible and entertaining Maureen Dowd column, and that’s a fancy way of saying it sucked. ass.
You actually bother reading Brooks’s bloviations? You have too much time on your hands. And, quite frankly, the NYTimes has too much allocation of newsprint, if it publishes his columns.
Art Buchwald was actually sometimes funny.
When I was a little kid, Art Buchwald and Erma Bombeck were my favorite things in the whole newspaper.
I wonder if there are little kids now who love David Brooks?
Indeed. I rarely read Brooks (the glosses from blogs seem to be enough), but the Nietzsche reference peaked my interest. Much to my chagrin, not only was the Nietzsche reference completely gratuitous, but it was whole column about how other people understand polling better than he does. Therefore, polls are worthless. And he gets paid for this? B-list bloggers do a better job.
Concatenate a quote in regard to King Fraudulla:
From tvtome—
“King Abdullah is a huge Star Trek fan and often enters forums under an alias to have a good discussion. He had one role in Star Trek: Voyager, but had no lines due to the fact that he wasn’t a member of the screen actors guild… and his shock at discovering he was on a tv set and not a ship.”
Would you rather be ruled by a stupid king or a stupid public?
Which is worse: a brute or a mob?
Or even better—how about the best of all possible worlds: a brute with a democratic mob behind him, and behind them, a secret council of plutocrats pulling everyone’s strings?
Now that’s what I call “social entropy in action.”
I think it’s a fine column. Especially considering the alternatives for partisans this week. For example, Dionne’s column in the WaPost, combining “insights” from polling data with “arguments” for his chosen position. It isn’t persuasive in the least, and doesn’t even attempt to make me smile.
I don’t normallly read Brooks but I perceive his caricature of presidential election pundits as quite accurate.
There are a bunch of people talking like this in Ireland at the moment. Are there none in America?
…and his shock at discovering he was on a tv set and not a ship
Nah, this is a malicious smear. The king is smart and merciful and gentle. His kingdom is peaceful and prosperous, his subjects are happy.
And it’s utterly disgusting that they didn’t allow him to have any lines in that show - what harm would that do? Wasn’t a member of the guild. Bastards.
Your charitable explanation is right on. What’s a conservative of some intelligence and some principles to do with a guy like Bush? Best not to talk about it.
Speaking of Art Buchwald, is Mark Russel still alive?
Or even better—how about the best of all possible worlds: a brute with a democratic mob behind him, and behind them, a secret council of plutocrats pulling everyone’s strings?
That was the most concise summary of the Republican Party’s 2004 election platform I’ve seen so far.
Apologia Brooks: Wise men know that Bobo knows nothing.
Brooks is wrong from the very first sentence:
Deep at the end of every election campaign, after all the issues have been beaten to death, when only the blowhards are still thundering, attention turns to the outcome. Who is going to win this thing already?
Attention is obsessively focused on the outcome from the get go. If he is going to write drivel, he can at least make it jibe with reality.
Wasn’t a member of the guild. Bastards.
As you know, no two members of SAG can share the same name. (PDF, §15) Apparently, there’s already a SAG member named King Abdullah of Jordan, so he would have had to change his name to “King Abdullah J. O’Jordan” in order to get the screen credit.
When Nixon nominated the unimpressive Judge Harrold Carswell to fill a seat on the Supreme Court, Senator Hruska offered the following ringing endorsement: “Even if he is mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren’t they, and a little chance? We can’t have all Brandeises, Cardozos, and Frankfurters, and stuff like that there.”
So give the guy a chance. We can’t have all Krugmans, and, er, Krugmans, and Krugmans.
Mildly reminiscent of Stephen Potter…….”But not in the South!”
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review