A while ago Slate had a long, and amusing, discussion of why people stand on escalators but walk up stairs. (I’m out of net range right now or I’d find a link.) Here’s a slightly tougher question. Why do people stand on escalators but walk on moving walkways?
Because it’s more tiring to climb stairs than walk along the flat …
because it is more fun
Here in New York a largish proportion of people (more than half I would think based on casual observation) walk up escalators; less but still a lot walk down as well. I get a kick out of supporting myself on the handrails of moving walkways, so my feet are not touching the ground but I’m moving forward — it’s a little like flying except not at all.
The only reason I don’t walk up escalators is all the silly buggers in front of me standing in the way. Fortunately, moving sidewalks are not as heavily used and don’t often present such a problem.
More seriously, I imagine it’s partly because of the fear of escalators we all had pressed into us as kids (“Don’t fool around on that or you’ll get sucked in and die!”). Rather than jump on and start hiking like they were moving stairs, we keep it simple, safe and stationary.
Although interesting in theory, the actual answer is quite obvious.
The answer has to be that escalators, despite physically resembling “stairs that move”, are in fact significantly different in structure.
Think about when the escalator is broken, and you need to walk up it. It is uncomfortable, because the steps are farther apart than on a stairway (about a foot rather than six inches) — useful for keeping stationary people separated, but not for easy climbing.
Given a set of stairs set next to a stopped escalator, everyone would take the stairs.
It is not significantly more difficult to walk on a moving walkway.
I seem to remember that on the escalators leading to the Metro in DC people not walking kept to the right, and walkers were able to pass on the left. Probably one in four were walkers.
I walk up escalators, and was pleasantly surprised at how often this human version of “slower cars keep left” thing worked on the Metro escalators. The on-walkers were consistently to the right, leaving room for walkers to pass.
I usually want to get where I’m going in the most expedient possible manner. I’ll run up (or down) a moving escalator if there’s room. I briskly walk or run on moving sidewalks if there’s room. If there’s no room I’d rather run up ordinary steps than wait for a packed escalator to transport me.
As for the inconvenient size of the escalator steps, I’m 6’3” so I’m actually more comfortable on the widely spaced steps (one of the few things ergonomically designed for tall people, if unintentionally).
As you may have guessed, I spend a fair amount of time at airports trying to make connecting flights! Escalators at the mall and escalators at the airport have significantly differing user habits.
In the SF Bay Area public transit systems, at least half, probably more, walk up and down the escalators, and a simple protocol of stand right, walk left has arisen to accomodate both practices. Sometimes you get someone standing left (usually a tourist), an act that causes much consternation on the part of commuters.
So I don’t know…I walk up escalators. Funny thing is, as someone who is taller than average, the higher steps on an escalator are a bit more comfortable than a lot of stairs.
I observed this same behavior on the Tube in London. VERY different from New York.
Because (in the U.S. at least)moving walkways are often very slow, and it makes you feel ridiculous to stand on one when people are walking by twice as fast?
Also: you can wheel your luggage on one and not the other.
But people do walk up escalators and stand still on moving walkways sometimes, of course.
I would, in contrast to Garrison and Landsburg rather take on a relative utility analysis. As dsquared points out, it’s heavy to walk up the escalator. Hence walking up makes you look worse off to the people that affords to stand. As Katherine points out, the moving walkway is very slow, so standing there makes you look much less efficient than those who walk.
A short while ago the National Building Museum issued a call for papers for its catalogue, “Up, Down, Across: Elevators, Escalators, and Moving Sidewalks,” wanting authors to write on the “social, cultural, and/or architectural impact of these human conveyance devices”. So this source, when published, might provide some leads for a properly scientific investigation of the topic.
Yes, I was going to say the same thing about London. There the etiquette is very much not to impede people who do want to walk. (I mean, how much thought does that take? Some people actually want to run, because guess what, they might be late, they might be running for a train! These things happen in public transport facilities.) It always annoys the hell out of me that most Americans stand there like stunned oxen, that you have to actually say ‘Excuse me’ if you want to walk and they’re in the way. And then they look at you as if you’re stark staring mad, just because you don’t want to waste a minute or two standing like a stunned ox on an escalator.
And how many of these people are exactly the same people who spend good money on health clubs in order to exercise on machines? Hmm? Yet confronted by an escalator, they stand perfectly still as if posing for a portrait.
It’s odd.
Escalator Etiquette - stand on the right! That way the people who do walk up (or down, as the case may be) can get by. If only this rule were universal!
Well I do my best. I have an on-going campaign to teach my fellow Murkans, one Murkan at a time, by civilly but firmly (actually if truth be told sometimes rather brusquely) saying ‘Excuse me’ and walking up or down. I figure they will eventually figure it out. I haven’t made much headway so far though. Still a lot of stunned oxen around.
I wonder what differentiates people who walk vs people who ride escalators, and whether that difference correlates to the walk/ride divide on walkways…
Moving sidewalks are made of rubber, so they’re bouncy and neat to walk on.
Here’s a poser: there are escalators that are more like inclined moving sidewalks, and use a continuous rubber surface instead of jointed metal treads. I suspect people will tend to walk on such escalators, where they might not on a regular escalator.
“Stand Right Walk Left” is indeed the commandment on DC’s Metro, and woe be to the tourists who screw it up.
The proportion of walkers to standers is much higher during rush hour, particularly in those stations where you switch between lines (i.e. you get off the Red Line, then bust ass down to the lower platform in hopes that your Orange Line train is there and you don’t miss it).
In the UK, does one Stand Right Walk Left or vice versa? I always figured that SRWL in the U.S. derived from the fact that you drive on the right and pass on the left*, and I’m curious whether it’s reversed in a country in which you drive on the other side.
*That is—if there’s more than one lane, the lanes closest to the center are the passing lanes. This is more or less theoretical, depending on where you are.
In the UK, does one Stand Right Walk Left or vice versa?
The London Underground is SRWL. IME, stations are also normally organised so you keep left (eg from the street, down escalators are generally on the left). This makes things easier if you are in a hurry, just keep left all the time. There are exceptions to this.
Non-transport escalators generally aren’t as wide, so SRWL isn’t practical.
I seldom encounter escalators or moving walkways except at airports, and it seems to me that moving walkways are much wider. Thus it is easy to SRWL on a moving walkway (especially with luggage or packages) and very difficult on escalators. Often I start to climb/descend on an escalator but catch sight of a person standing still with luggage ahead…what’s the point of moving further, if I’ll simply be blocked?
Re tourists standing right while locals are trying to walk left: I’m now a Londoner, but still have a recognisably southern American accent. So when I politely ask non-London British tourists to get out of the way (not by saying “excuse me”, of course, but by saying “sorry”), I often get a sharp look, as if to say, “Don’t you tell me what to do in my own country, Yankee boy.” (Of course, that’s when I tell them that under New Labour they’re legally required to follow my orders.)
Um, that should read “tourists standing left while locals are trying to walk left”
I find that saying “excuse me, on your left” has the best effect on chiral tourists.
Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review