If anyone has the time, I would love to see a systematic study of how many male versus female academics (or other professionals) portray themselves on their Web sites with or without babies. I realize the complications, e.g. really hard to sample people’s homepages, really hard to control for whether said person portrayed on a Web site even has a baby, but I’d still be curious to see someone gather data on this.
Here’s my motivation for the question. I recently saw a job talk where the candidate had pictures of his kids on his computer’s desktop. I have never seen a woman give a talk with this kind of background illustration (granted, I had never before seen a man give such a talk either). It made me think that this person could pull it off because as a guy he does not have to be concerned about committee members wondering whether he has a spouse who will need a job as well or whether he will take his work seriously despite the fact that he has children. But I recall plenty of cases of women who are married without children or on the market as mothers worrying considerably about how to downplay such personal information.
My impression is that men tend to put up pictures of their children on their professional Web sites more often, but I do not base this observation on any systematic analysis of the situation. I suspect the reason for this (assuming it really is the case) is that for male professionals to show themselves with a baby counts as a positive quality, or, in the least, will likely not count as a negative. It suggests that he is a concerned and proud father who takes his parental duties seriously (okay, that may be a leap:), he is an enlightened man. In contrast, I suspect women still feel that they have to prove themselves as professional first, parent second (or in the least prove that the latter doesn’t trump the former) thus prompting them not to be quite as forward about personal information on their Web sites. I guess one could argue that if for someone a proud father means an enlightened man then a proud mother should not come with negative repercussions, but it is not clear that the mothers feel that way about it.
Just among the people I know, I can think of at least a few couples where the man’s Web site has relatively prominent family information whereas the woman’s site downplays any such content. Even if it is simply about the parents projecting onto their environment how they may be perceived, that is already something to consider about how mothers versus fathers are made to feel about their family situations in professional settings.
Does it count if I have a link from my professional page to my family pictures page, but no actual pictures? I also have links to my op-ed and blog writing, as well as ongoing research and curricular and teaching projects. I also have a wholly professional cv page, which is one of the first links on my main page.
I don’t think a systematic survey is strictly necessary, though it would probably suffice for some sociologist’s seminar paper; clearly the trend is as you describe it, and the reasons you describe are quite well-known.
I have noticed the same thing. I think you have a good point there. Personally I tend to be a bit put off in general by any professional web sites where the ‘about me’ page features too many details and photos of family, spouse, children, etc. Whether it’s a man or a woman doing it, I just think it’s a bit, um, tacky - there’s exceptions, sometimes it fits with an informal tone in presenting yourself, and of course it’s a matter of personal preference. I just think it’s more professional to avoid references to one’s private life. To have a separate “family pictures” site for that, if desired. If I want to hire a web designer I couldn’t care less if he or she is married with children or not and how gorgeous they are. Sometimes, there’s a sort of involuntary implication of family as career achievement, as a sort of asset to show off, I don’t know, it depends how it’s done, but it can come across as a bit too… reality-show style (especially when it’s in the form of “I live with my BEAUTIFUL wife and three children”…) Photos of children I find especially troublesome. Again, it depends, but I generally don’t think it’s a great idea to have pictures of your kids broadcast to anyone on a medium where you can’t control who accesses them. Plus the kids cannot give their consent, what if when they grow up they feel embarassed by having their name and child pictures on the internet? It can be cute when it’s a family site, but on a professional site, I think it’s a no no, regardless of gender.
Yeah, I think Eszter is basically right about this. A related phenomenon in severe cases is women removing their wedding rings during job-talk visits. (I’ve also heard of women acquiring fake wedding rings before attending particular conferences.)
I raised this exact issue in an entry last year, along with some general thoughts on Deborah Tannen-type arguments.
Short version: yes, I think it’s true that academic men (and professional men more generally) have the privilege to incorporate representations of their family into presentations of their work and not be regarded as unprofessional for it—and that women do not. I was even able to mention the fact that because I had been serving as the primary caregiver for an infant in the second half of my sabbatical, I didn’t get that much done, and not feel self-conscious about it. A female colleague observed that no woman could do that.
But my reading of that observation is different than hers. She’d rather no one does it; I’d rather everyone could do it.
I once saw a man applying for an academic job show a picture of his family at the end of a slide show, and thought to myself “I wonder if he’s trying to assure the audience that he isn’t gay?”
Or could it be that men are more visual?
I heard a radio program about women in prison. They said that when the prisoner’s children came to visit, the women kept smelling them. As a guy, that really wouldn’t occur to me.
Seems obvious really. The truly interesting study would be who has pictures of their pets and cats or dogs? Or exotics?
MKK
Are we talking here about academic homepages or about blogs? I’ve been known to post about my son on occasion, complete with occasional pictures. But that’s on my blog. I wouldn’t do it on a school-related homepage. And I think I’ve included a picture of him in a Powerpoint class presentation exactly once—the day after he was born.
In a completely random survey of every one of the current homepages of the 44 members of my major at my alma mater (U.Penn, English Dept.) I found that of the 24 men and 20 women, only two had family pictures — both were men. One was a family group shot with no young children present or relationships described. The other was the former head of the Department (he was head when I was there) and had the most extensive webpage of any member of the faculty on a whole range of issues. It shows him with 2 young children.
I wonder how much of this is self-censorship versus actual prejudice. I guess you would have to see if percent of women with pictures of children increase after the women get tenure. (While controlling for the fact that the percent of women with children — photographed or not — likely increases after tenure.)
One theory I’ve heard is that male professors use the kid pictures as a signal that they are NOT single, because they think college administrators are concerned about the risk of prof-student relationships with single professors.
Yes, Eszter, I think you’re totally right. Women with kids have to have keep the kids in a closet, while professional dads get to be the proud papas. I remember Tim’s post on the topic, and I agree with him. Everyone should post the baby pictures on their laptops.
The problem is that a woman professional with kids is seen as less capable. Her first priority must be the kids, so there is no way she can get the work done. It’s assumed that that dads have a stay at home mother to take care of sick days from school and such. Their work won’t be impeded by the rugrats.
Also, there is the widespread assumption that moms are stupid and preoccupied with potty changing and Oprah. Have a kid and your IQ drops by 40 points.
An alternative or supplementary hypothesis:
Academics have high social status, and males with high social status are also highly likely to marry, and hence have kids whose snapshots they can display.
Women with high social status are far more unlikely to marry than males. They don’t display snapshots of their kids because they don’t have any kids in the first place.
The high status could also tend to mean especially attractive wives, and therefore children, whose pictures reflect well on the husband and father.
One of my colleagues is working on a series of vignette and audit studies of the motherhood penalty and fatherhood wage premium. (These phenomenon are pretty well known in the gender inequality literature, but most of the evidence comes from longitudinal survey data that aren’t particularly definitive about causality.)
She’s found that, given identical cues about the competence and experience of hypothetical employees, respondents consistently judge mothers to be less competent, assign lower compensation, tolerate much less absenteeism, and are less likely to nominate them for managerial training than single women, fathers, or childless men. So far she’s been limited to undergraduate respondents, though she’s working on an audit variant that uses real employers. To the extent that this phenomenon carries over to the real world, and the wage data suggest it does, disguising parental status may still be very rational for many women.
I’ve noticed gender-biased evaluations first hand, in our faculty searches. If we’re talking about a female candidate, inevitably one of the first questions out of someone’s mouth is, “what does her partner do?” (See, we’re so liberal in academic sociology that when we’re making gendered assumptions about career ambitions and “moveability,” we use “partner” rather than “husband”.) The two-body issue comes up for the male candidates, but usually not until after the discussion of the substance and quality of their work. Drives me nuts.
Seems to me that women wouldn’t put kids piccies into their workspace because we all know that anything which can be used against us will be. Sorry if that sounds depressive/pessimistic. I heard a guy the other week saying women should be paid less to do city jobs because there was a higher risk of them suing for sexist treatment!!
As in Kaw’s comment, I’ve seen the gender bias on children in a couple of departments, especially in evaluation of grad students. Women with children are treated as not serious, distracted, and are not encouraged to continue in the program. Men with children get special notice and consideration. I attended one funding meeting in which a colleague actually suggested as a reason to give a teaching assistantship to a particular male grad student that “he has a child to support.” At the same time, a single mother was discussed as having too many irons in the fire. Maddening.
If men have a larger presence in academia, and male academics have a larger presence on the internet, then you’d have to compare proportionally rather than just numerically. I’m not sure which you were doing, but I suspect the latter.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review