I very much hope that the US (and British) occupation of Iraq is a success, that peace will soon prevail, that a stable civilian administration is soon installed, that democratic institutions take root and that the Iraqi people enjoy a prosperous and uneventful future. That said, I’ve long thought that when people in or supportive of the Bush administration point to the experience of postwar Germany as suggestive of what can be achieved, there is some rather desperate flailing around for historical parallels going on. Good then to see some reflections on this from someone with a degree of historical, political and sociological insight who actually experienced the allied occupation of Germany: namely, Ralf Dahrendorf .
Is Ralph Ralf’s twin-brother?
[Thanks Brayden - I’ve fixed this. C]
I have the theory that the systematic recasting of the Iraqi campaign in WW2 analogies is more than just an attempt at selling specific policies.
What did we not have to hear: Saddam = Hitler, anti-war movement = appeasers, Bush = Churchill, postwar Iraq = postwar Japan/Germany, Iraqi resistance = Nazi Werewolves, Baath = Nazi, feeding Halliburton and Bechtel = Marshall Plan and many, many more dubious historical equivalences. This is happening at an obsessive scale.
This is outright nostalgia in my view. Think of it: in 1945 the US was not only victorious in the largest conflict ever; it was also dynamic and vigorous. The other victors were ruined and exhausted. The US economy generated 50% of the world’s GDP, it was awash with cash and capital, it was growing healthily and everybody was upbeat. The US was the only nuclear power and had unprecedented diplomatic authority. Never did the US have more power and prestige than after WW2. To relive this glory is the dream that propels the neocons and other US supremacists. Just as empire nostalgia is discretely pervasive in the UK, greatest generation yearning quietly drives the US.
Just a theory.
Chris, whilst this is an interesting article to link to, I’d like you to have explained at a little more length why those making the comparison are guilty of ‘desperate flailing’.
It took years, not months, to get any kind of indigenous rule going in Germany after the war, and the path to that was far from straightforward - indeed, one could argue that East Germany never really gained its independence at all in the fullest sense. I refer to your own post on your ’80s trip to EG here. Critics of the occupation of Iraq sometimes expect things to move more quickly than is sane to expect - e.g. France calling for immediate withdrawal and immediate handover of power. The comparison is being made to say, look, we’ve been here before, it can work in similarly unpromising circumstances, and it takes more than five minutes to do. Which is not an unfair point to make. Your problem with it may just be that the comparison fails to put the US in a sinister light, of course.
That said, I’ve long thought that when people in or supportive of the Bush administration point to the experience of postwar Germany as suggestive of what can be achieved, there is some rather desperate flailing around for historical parallels going on.
As opposed to those opposed to the liberation of Iraq who are “desperately flailing around” about trying to cast the situation as another Vietnam? ;)
It took years, not months, to get any kind of indigenous rule going in Germany after the war, and the path to that was far from straightforward - indeed, one could argue that East Germany never really gained its independence at all in the fullest sense. I refer to your own post on your ‘80s trip to EG here. Critics of the occupation of Iraq sometimes expect things to move more quickly than is sane to expect - e.g. France calling for immediate withdrawal and immediate handover of power. The comparison is being made to say, look, we’ve been here before, it can work in similarly unpromising circumstances, and it takes more than five minutes to do.
I agree, the “desperate flailing” seems to primarily come from those who opposed the Iraqi liberation and are trying to find some rationale to justify their previous position. The only reason to compare post-war Iraq with post-war Germany (or Japan) is to make the point that while progress may not be going as quickly as some would like, we appear to be progressing relatively quickly compared to the reconstruction of Germany and Japan – neither of which are considered “disasters” or “failures” today.
None of know the future, and nearly all of us look backwards at either our personal history or at world history of some guidance as to how to move forward. The analogies to WWII, when Tony Blair made them, rung true for me, so I supported the way.
Those opposed to the war also sought historical analogies, like Vietnam.
This strikes me as one of those issues where reasonable people can disagree. I don’t have the slightest idea if the WWII analogy will prove more apt than the Vietnam analogy, or vice versa. Nor does anyone else.
Things are going about as I expected, and if I had supported the war I would feel OK about it right now. But because I expected approximately this, I didn’t support the war, and a lot of people supported the war after talking themselves into the idea that the occupation would be easy. So there’s a political problem now.
Things are going about as I expected, and if I had supported the war I would feel OK about it right now. But because I expected approximately this, I didn’t support the war, and a lot of people supported the war after talking themselves into the idea that the occupation would be easy. So there’s a political problem now.
I supported the Iraqi phase of the war while expecting the situation to be much worse - i.e. a chemical/bio weapon attack on the troops, street fighting to capture Baghdad, an inferno in the oil fields, and a ten year occupation. So far none of these expectations have thankfully come to fruition (a testament to everything which has been done right) and right now it looks like a matter of political will to finish the job. Despite the attempts by some in the opposition leadership to try and gain traction over the bodies of dead American servicemen with a casualty-conscious public, there does not appear to be any reason to believe that the administration is going to go “wobbly” any time soon.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review