I was searching for the journal The Information Society yesterday on our library’s online catalog system. I had looked up the journal the day before so I knew that we had a subscription to it. Regardless, yesterday I kept getting “Your search found no matching record”, which was incredibly frustrating given that I had just browsed the journal the day before. Finally, I decided to try the search without the “the” in the title. I’m not sure why that occured to me, but I gave it a try. Surprise-surprise, searching simply for information society specified as the Journal Title worked.
I realize search engines often exclude articles like “the”, but it seems if it is part of a journal title it should not count against you to include the article. It’s one thing to exclude it completely but bring up related results nonetheless, it’s another to have it count as a hindrance leading to no results. In case anyone’s wondering, using quotes or a plus sign in front of “the” - strategies that would help in some search engines - do not lead to any results either (in fact, the quotes confuse the system completely).
I wrote to the library to tell them about the incident and ask whether they could tweak the code so it wouldn’t count against you to know the actual full title of the journal one is seeking. I just received a response according to which the library has already asked the online catalog system provider Endeavor to make this change - as have other libraries apparently - but they have not cared to improve the system. Ugh.
You would not believe (or perhaps you would after all) how difficult it is getting catalog system providers to make even the smallest and most rational changes.
At ALA one of the primary topics of conversation, in the bars after the meetings, is just how lousy catalog system providers are. How unresponsive. How take-the-money-and-run. How illogical. How sullen and uncooperative.
Librarians generally like our jobs, but system providers are bad, bad, bad. Hates them, my precious, we do.
I wanna know what you’re feeling —
there are some things you can’t hide.
I wanna know what you’re thinking —
tell me what’s on your mind!
I was having the same problem today with a demonstration I did of database searching in one of my history classes: an incredibly balky catalog system for one journal database kept ignoring my requests for titles when I knew there were citations there that were relevant to the title. Making a small change in the title phrase entered turned it all up—but it was definitely a face of a stupid search design.
I think this is one of the small but massively important issues in contemporary academic life, and the passivity of academics about it drives me wild. The proliferation of vendors and interfaces in electronic databases, and the sometimes extortionate pricing of some databases, is getting to the point of being absolute unacceptably dysfunctional.
We need to seriously push our institutions and libraries as a single, united negotiating entity towards promoting a universal search interface for ALL citational databases relevant to academic work. There’s no reason why Book Reviews Online, InfoTrac, EXAC, ABC-CLIO and many others ought to be as different (and sometimes badly designed) as they are. I would argue that a united bloc pushing a single highly usable standard should be prepared to use its negotiating power to completely boycott any vendor that refuses to engage in the construction of such a standard in concert with other vendors.
This would go along with academics in toto refusing to order or provision material to participants in any full-text journal service that does not adhere to “fair price” constraints and a continued commitment to providing material that they own, but that’s another issue.
I’d love to have your problems.
Seriously, this stuff is incredibly common and if you haven’t run into the problem often enough to routinely make varied queries, you should count yourself lucky and be glad you learned something new the easy way (you didn’t order the journal to later find out your library already has it).
Timothy - I agree that some joint approach would be nice to see. It’s a bit frustrating to hear from the library that they know other libraries have complained as well, but the vendor simply refuses to improve the product.
Markus - the point isn’t whether and how often you’ve run into such a glitch, the point is that it should be fixed so we could use our energies for other things than running repeated varied queries.
On a related issue, I’ve had British journals change the spelling of references to conform to British spelling. The result, of course, is that the reference is now wrong, and searching for it under that name won’t work well.
Academics, liberate yourselves from the tyranny of closed publishers and their crappy proprietary search systems! Computer scientists already have, more or less; CiteSeer indexes nearly all the computer science academic papers freely available on the web (which, these days, is nearly all newly published papers). Because CiteSeer’s an open database, you can also use a site-focused Google search.
Do your profession a favor: create a new professional norm wherein academics commonly make all their papers available in PDF format on their home pages. Then have your professional organization license the CiteSeer code. Then, someday, you too will be able to search research papers using Google. You have nothing to lose but your chains.
Yeah, I was going to say, isn’t this a problem tailor-made for Google to solve? Isn’t it almost trivial, compared with 3bn web pages?
Somebody tell the biz dev folks at Google; here’s a market to clean up in…
At a guess, the journals don’t let Google in; most of them restrict access to paid users.
Journals are in a similar position that the record and movie industries are in, but worse. They make their money on controlling information flows, but the information comes from a subset of their customer base. And more critically, their review process comes from their customer base.
They’re sort of like a record company which sells to artists, or a publisher who publishes fanfic for a fan base. Their customers are in a much better position to subvert the process.
Barry, I think Doug’s point may be that Google could try to go into this market.. not in its publicly available form, but in proprietary mode. It’s a good idea. And Barry, you’re absolutely right that the customer base should be able to have a pretty big say in this. I’m going to ask around to see if Google has considered this market at all.
We use Endeavor here. I have no idea why they do that. Other systems (for instance Innovative, and I think Sirsi) strip out the articles automatically.
Speaking as a librarian, indeed a cataloger… I didn’t even notice this before. I reflexively get rid of initial articles anyway, because I know that they aren’t of any use. I use other library catalogs all the time. Another problem is name order; if you use an author browse and search for “Mark Twain”, Voyager isn’t smart enough to figure out that the surname is “Twain” and will send you to last name “Mark”. Our students run into that all the time.
Why not go bug them in person? They’re a Chicago company.
1350 E. Touhy Ave. Suite 200 East
Des Plaines, IL USA 60018-4505
Interestingly, the Z-39.50 interface for Northwestern uses a different search style and your search would have worked on that.
At UMD we often use Dialogue which make suse of command line codes to do even a basic search. It’s infuriating to say the least, especially since I often find what I need for my Library Science classes on Google.
Library catalog searches are close to my heart, since one of the first significant projects I led (in 1986) was to write a catalog and circulation system for a university library. The question of an intelligent search interface and its implementation generated an interesting set of problems. However Google seems to have by and large solved it. They do have a Google Search Appliance, hardware and software to index any collection of documents - it’s what I’d buy if I had the problem to solve again.
Eszter, that’s exactly what I was wondering. And it looks like Douglas has answered aat least part of the question. Ready for the Google IPO?
So I just got asked by a patron to help them find an article on our old balky ProQuest CD-ROM system. Didn’t work so we used the online. And the article she needed was listed alphabetically under The. Had a hard time finding it scanning the journal table of contents (it was a long one). I had to find it another way, as I didn’t think of looking under the inital article. Old habits die hard.
And we didn’t buy Endevor because we hated its catalog interface…
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review