WASHINGTON- In an unusual joint press conference, President Bush and Senator John Kerry announced the nomination of Rep. Christopher Cox of California to serve as director of the CIA. The joint nomination virtually ensures Cox’s confirmation, at a time when Administration officials have warned the public to expect attacks. “In this time of uncertainty, we need stability in our intelligence agencies. I promised to reform our intelligence capabilities, and I intend to keep that promise,” said President Bush. “That’s why I’ve been in communication with Senator Kerry on this nomination…”
If you don’t like Christopher Cox, pick someone else. I wouldn’t dream of any President extending this kind of consideration for most appointments, but the CIA director is an unusual case. Porter Goss is a poison pill in a position where we can least afford one. There seems to be some agreement that Porter Goss’s open partisanship makes it almost inevitable that he will be dismissed in the event of a Kerry victory. That’s not good.
Maybe Goss will turn out to be an excellent head of the CIA. But his nomination has more than a whiff of positioning, and he’ll have no traction until November (if Bush wins) or January (if Kerry wins). If we’re sincerely expecting attacks, and we’re sincere about wanting to reform our intelligence, then we’ve got to have CIA leadership that can get to work, regardless of which way the votes fall.
Maybe I’m daydreaming, but it seems like we’ve missed a great opportunity for statesmanship. You may say that I’m a dreamer. But I’m not the only one.
Imagining Bush actually acting as a uniter, not a divider?
Dream on
Dream on
Dream on
Aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh…
Statesmanship is a tie in a zero sum game. It benefits neither party, and thus is not useful as strategic action. Incumbency is protected well enough that there is no need for mutual “feel good” moves to protect both parties’ incumbents when major points can be scored…and the pro-incumbency benefit to Bush would be almost nil.
Damn straight. I’m always amazed by Bush’s handlers on issues like this, where a chance at real statesmanship presents itself and yet they cannot trust either in its outcomes or in its popular reception. Personally, if I was Bush, I would have publically asked Biden to do it, which would be a win-win, he either takes it and the Dems lose one of their best voices in service of the administration, all while the Bushies look like they recognize that the lessons of 9-11 mean being non-partisan (unlike Kerry, they would then say), or Biden says no, and then the Bushies could claim the Dems are playing politics with the country’s future. But neither scenarios, your hopeful dream or my politik nightmare, come to pass, because at the end of the day, Bush is a partisan hack not even interested in the appearance of solidarity. This is one of those things that happens with enough regularity that it’s clearly not a sign of stupidity or lack of thought, but rather the outgrowth of a very peculiar and ideological predisposition.
Justin, I disagree. Incumbency may be structurally protected for a number of reasons, especially agenda setting, but different incumbents receive different levels of help from their establishment status. Here, and given the contingencies of 9-11, I think statesmanship would have provided a pretty potent boon to the Bush administration at a time when polls increasingly show them needing one.
Expecially since, if Bush gained even a few % from not pushing 9/11 and the Iraq war for all possible political gain, that could make the difference in this election.
Good god you scared me. I thought you were quoting some source. THE Chris “I hung out with the taliban” Cox? MY representative Chris Cox? Director of the CIA? JEEEEEBUS!
The nomination of Goss represents two key elements of the Bush ethos - loyalty over competence, and political gain over national security. Goss is an unqualified party loyalist. The Democrats can either fight Bush and be accused of helping Al Qaeda, or they can let him through, thereby helping Al Qaeda.
There seems to be some agreement that Porter Goss’s open partisanship makes it almost inevitable that he will be dismissed in the event of a Kerry victory.
I don’t know about this. Would he have the courage to do it?
Dreamer? No. Incredibly naive? Yes.
Bush doesn’t care about statemanship, America or who would make the best CIA director. Bush only cares about Bush.
Nor should the Democratic Party, at this point in time, after the numerous failures and betrayals on Bush’s part, trust anything he does.
It doesn’t matter whether Porter Gross is incredibly partisan or not; with Bush’s track record, any candidate he is going to put forward should be voted against, because they’re going to be obviously incompetent, corrupt, or both.
I’m sort of with hansomdevil. Cox is a jerk. Not quite as wretched as some other Orange County congressmen, like Dana Rorabacher and Bob Dornan (thankfully dispatched by Loretta Sanchez) but a wrong guy nonetheless.
However, were he to be named for the post, he might not run in the election, and our hopeless Democrat John Graham might have a chance.
I know the only acceptable liberal talking point is “as hawkish as the Republicans, but now with added competency!” but my dream would be for an influential politician to stand up and say, “you know what, this terrorism thing isn’t really that big a deal. Perhaps the world doesn’t really need to be turned upside down. Maybe we should stop obsessing over it. Just try to stop it when we can, maybe stop supporting/installing autocratic governments, and try to do the right thing.”
I don’t get it. As a broadly informed guy who knows nothing about Goss (I had never heard of him before about three days ago), he seems like an ideal candidate. Big wigs in government are pretty much interchangeable; Guiliani is Goss is Cox is Ridge etc etc etc. By and large, there’s not alot of difference between them -other than party affiliation.
So given that a Republican is president, one would expect a Republican CIA chief nominee. Given that it could have been any Republican semi-big wig that was nominated for the position, it seems remarkably fortuitous that Bush picked a guy who actually used to work for the CIA! Are you really arguing that Republican presidents shouldn’t nominate Republicans for their political appointments? Anything else is partisan? Sheesh.
Steve
Steve,
Of course I don’t mean that. I made the point that I wouldn’t expect consideration in other positions, and I specifically chose Cox in my fantasy because he was a Republican. But it looks plausible that Bush chose a candidate whose track record shows that he wouldn’t be able to work with Kerry. That means that he won’t be able to get anything done until the election (if Bush wins) or until Kerry takes office and dismisses him. That introduces an unnecessary delay that implies a distinct unseriousness about intelligence reform.
Maybe I’m daydreaming, but it seems like we’ve missed a great opportunity for statesmanship.
It hadn’t even occurred to me that the Administration would take any action with respect to the CIA directorship other than nakedly political ones.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review