Via Invisible Adjunct, I see that Bob at Unfogged has had a smart idea -academic reality tv. His proposal - Ph.D. Island - desperate Ph.D. students, with tenured faculty sitting in judgement, awarding one lucky candidate a half-way decent job in a half-way decent city.
It’s a nice concept - but I have an alternative proposal. I reckon that we male social scientists are in urgent need of a different sort of reality tv. All of us could do with some serious input from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy. Academic lawyers have their bow ties, b-school types have their Armani outfits. We have our badly fitting blue suits. Anyone who’s ever been to the APSA annual convention, and seen several thousand of these suits milling about a hotel lobby, checking out each other’s name badges, has glimpsed the very bowels of fashion hell. I’m not exempting my own dress sense by any means - I’m a classic exponent of the anonymous slacks, blue shirt and bland tie combo myself. We all need help: if there has ever been a profession that could do with a serious makeover from the fashionistas (whether they be gay or straight), we are it. TV producers - I’m waiting for your call.
And everyone knows how well economists dress. Yeah, I’m in for this.
Economists’ dress sense is only marginally fashionable, naturally.
Funny, I was just thinking about a quiz show where philosophers competed with Joe Schmoe in resolving various hypothetical moral dilemmas and defending them, with the audience voting on who’s solution + defense they thought was best.
Not that it’s a good idea, of course….
We’ll have to have the makeover quickly. APSA is at the end of this month!
Come to Debbie’s wedding Henry. I’ll wear my cool ass Beige suit with the black pin-sripe shirt and loud tie. It makes me feel like a Goodfella. I wanted to wear it at the one in January, but that turned out to be black tie (and I still maintain I had one of the best Tux’s there, as far as Tuxedoes can vary from one to t’other.)
How generous of you to exclude female social scientists from your little project, but I’m not sure the generosity was warranted. I can think of more than a few women who can use the help — the problems are a little more diverse than in the case of the men, but they are still urgent problems.
I hear from a reliable source that, at their disciplinary meetings, economists and political science people are most dressy, the anthropologists are the least dressy, and the sociologists are in the middle. But being in the middle has its hazards, because instead of just throwing on that badly fitting blue suit, they have to make actual decisions about clothing. Which they are mostly ill-equipped to make.
While I haven’t had the chance to watch Queer Eye, I doubt I’d find those guys to be a better choice than Trinny and Susannah from What Not to Wear.
EngLit academics vary in their dress sense according to age and specialisation. As a c-18-er, I suppose I’m expected to head off towards the world of shabby genteel once I give in and look for a teaching job. (Think Tom Paulin, representing for the dix-huit via Hazlitt.) Or pinstripes. Moderns get away with ‘gay or eurotrash’ roll-necks and velvet jackets, which means that they wouldn’t need a queer eye; Victorian types tend to like their frills; anything pre-renaissance, though, and it can be a toss up between grammar-school student/professor and charity shop doyenne. (dsquared can back me up on this, I hope: does the green corduroy-yellow sweater combo ring a bell?)
All of these are, of course, hideous generalisations, and dependent upon Oxford-style periodisation rather than Cambridge-style theme specialisation. Still, I’m no judge on what Germaine Greer wears.
Historians seem to do better. Possibly because they make more money from their books. And get the TV tie-ins with the complimentary wardrobe. David Starkey has the advantage of all that, and of having a gay man’s dress sense. (I know, I know, terrible cliché.) And Simon Schama looks pretty dapper most of the time.
Actually, there’s your show: David Starkey’s Academic Makeover. ‘And this week, Harold Bloom: just how long have you been wearing that jumper?’
My friend (and Imprints co-founder) Alan Carling writes in his essay “Rational Choice Marxism and Postmodern Feminism: Towards a More Meaningful Incomprehension” of his experience of APSA:
….you have to hand it to US academics: they sure know how to organize a conference that feels like a serious business convention. There were actually men and women there in suits, especially those silver-sheeny ones in a mottled semi-reflective material that looks as if they descend from a job-lot of curtain lengths delivered by UFO somewhere over Colorado circa 1955… By dressing below this level, it was possible to regard oneself as a marginally dangerous intellectual presence, or at any rate a marginal one. (In the UK, by contrast, it is physically impossible to dress so low as to be the worst-dressed person present at the Annual Conference of the British Sociological Association).
In Rational Choice Marxism, ed. Terrell Carver and Paul Thomas, Pennsylvania University Press, 1995, p.301. and previously quoted by Chris Brooke over at the The Virtual Stoa.
The funny thing is, social-science academics are the well-dressed ones on campus. Wander into a physical science department, and you’ll see much worse than ill-fitting blue suits.
Several years back, Physics Today ran one of its periodic soul-searching articles about what’s wrong with physics as a profession, and asked a whole bunch of people to suggest why it was hard to attract students. One of the answers was, basically, “Look at how you people dress! Nobody wants to be part of that…”
I have long assumed that the reason why economists (including myself) dress the way we do is that it’s a perfect example of an externality; we don’t have to look at ourselves.
“I can think of more than a few women who can use the help — the problems are a little more diverse than in the case of the men, but they are still urgent problems.”
Yes. Women have more options, which means we also have more opportunities to get it all wrong. On the other hand, there is an entire industry devoted to women’s makeup and fashion. From the drugstore to the grocery checkout, the sources of advice are everywhere, and they are hard to ignore.
So I do think men need more help.
A couple of hints for male social scientists:
Lose the polyblend trousers.
Blue suits are for court appearances (as a defendant).
Silk ties are not more expensive than polyester, and the difference in quality is far greater than the difference in price.
Outside of the academy, the unhappy compromise known as the “short-sleeved dress shirt” is considered an oxymoron.
I can’t speak for every business school, of course, but I have toured pretty much all the top ones, and I challenge you to find an Armani suit anywhere. (Wait — I did have one well-dressed professor, Toby Stuart. But he’s clearly the exception that proves the rule.) In my experience, business school academics come in three sartorial types: ill-fitting “slightly irregular” suit from Today’s Man (because the ROI on a better suit is clearly negative); slightly better-fitting suit from Brooks Brothers (it’s a signalling mechanism); and “my God, professor, wherever did you find mint green tweed?” Of course, since their students seem to think that khakis and a polo shirt are the height of fashion, anything more would probably be wasted.
Laura:
I hear from a reliable source that, at their disciplinary meetings, economists and political science people are most dressy, the anthropologists are the least dressy, and the sociologists are in the middle.
I think you’re on to something: I just spent far too much money for a simple pair of pants and a new sport coat for a meeting this month, at which point my biologist-ecologist wife proposed that formality of dress decreases with the possibility that one might work outdoors . It’s quite common for ecologists to wear shorts and t-shirts to their annual meetings (prestige comes from the t-shirt’s logo, of course: Is it from an exotic research station?), but lab-bound biologists are still decked out in suits. Anthropologists at least have a good possibility of seeing the sun in the course of their work; sociologists, well, maybe through the window or while doing field work; economists and political scientists — I don’t know, do they have windows?
Physicists (and mathematicians?), of course, hoe their own row, as Chad pointed out.
Computer Science seems to be an exception to the “probability that you’d work outside” rule. T-shirts sporting semi-offensive slogans or advertising some product or other are pretty much de rigeur at CS conferences, and yet CS types generally strive never to see the sun.
This is pretty clearly a case of signalling. By wearing shabby (and hopefully offensive in some clever way) clothes, you’re indicating that you’re someone who does real technical work, which means that you don’t have to dress well. In fact, “suit” is the derogatory term for management, sales, and marketing types who dress well. I suspect there’s also an element of Zahavi’s “handicap principle” here. If you’re able to dress badly and still get ahead, you must be pretty smart.
In biology, dress sense seems to vary by field and correlate with funding. In my experience, well-funded biomedical types (molecular oncology, immuno, etc.) tend to dress considerably better than their less well-funded molecular genetics/cell bio peers. And, of course, Howard Hughes grant recipients are the best-dressed.
Elaine Showalter, then-President of the Modern Language Association, actually had a piece on academic fashion run in Vogue about 7 or 8 years back. Only women’s fashion, though.
On my campus, the fashion divide is clearly disciplinary: the scientists wear jeans, T-shirts, & Tevas; the Arts & Letters types wear, well, artsy stuff for the women, and jeans & dress shirts for the men; the social scientists wear suits.
At professional conventions, the rule is different: if you see someone in a suit, 10-1 s/he’s on the job market…
Political scientists are wearing suits these days? The men used to wear khaki pants (a bit too short, and a bit too tight around the waist), a blue shirt, a navy blazer, and an ugly tie. And comfy shoes, like Hush Puppies or Wallabies or something. But I haven’t gone to APSA (or been in academia—so I like the Ph.D. Island show a LOT) in more than ten years, so maybe they’re wearing suits now.
I laughed out loud at the short-sleeved shirts comment, too.
I dunno when you people ever get off campus, but short sleeved dress shirts WITH TIES is pretty standard ‘business dress’ where I work. business ‘casual’ is the usual khakis with a polo, (for casual Fridays of course), but otherwise you’d better be wearing a tie. Funny, the comment about signalling, because anybody around here without a tie is usually either the facilities personnel (janitors) or the computer operators, or network people, who are just rude mechanicals in contrast to the developers who actually write the code. (sarcasm).
I’m a little late to this one, but most of the people at the conference I was just at were dressed pretty well I thought. (Present company excepted, but then I dressed badly even when I was in law school, so this is hardly attributable to my being an academic.) Maybe because this was a summer conference (so no job market) full of young people, but it certainly wasn’t the fashion disaster that some people may think covers all of academia.
I agree with what I think ekr’s point was.
If yer wearing a suit, you’re a facilator/admin bod (or in search of funding) or if yer in general “go-to-hell” mode, you’re at still at the pointy end.
Mind you, I went to Art College where the general dress code (for both staff and students) was either the first thing you found on the floor that passed the smell test and/or 20 minutes with the black nail polish.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review