What the bloody hell is this all on about??? My Spanish is a bit ropey, but I have at least established to my own satisfaction that vheadline.com is correctly reporting a Venezuelan national press story, and VENPRES was reporting a story which El Mundo of Madrid did in fact carry (but isn’t available without paying). In this story, El Mundo is apparently reporting (and, btw, I’ve usually found the Spanish press pretty reliable on the few occasions I’ve had to rely on them) … the following assertions:
Update: thank heaven somebody bothered to check this one out
I’d be grateful if any CT readers could confirm to me that El Mundo has the wrong end of the stick, because the alternative of believing that the intelligence service of our only superpower has a view of the world rather less realistic than that of David Icke, while not exactly without precedent, is pretty frightening when it applies to one of the world’s biggest petroleum exporters. In any case, if a plot to assassinate Chavez shows up between now and Sunday, you read it here first, unless you subscribe to El Mundo, VENPRES, vheadline.com or any one of a number of mailing lists.
Probably your Spanish is better than William Spencer’s.
The CIA believe that if Chavez wins, he will overthrow the governments of Bolivia and Colombia, then use the multiple corruption scadals in Peru as an excuse to invade and remove the current government
The CIA believe that Chavez’ ultimate plan is to use Venezuela and Peru as twin centres of a revolution to create a Latin American socialist superstate.
WTF? Do they get their information from Jose Chalabi, well-known exile from Bolivia?
The only explanation I can think of is that there is, after all, quite a lot of crack cocaine about in that part of the world, and that at some point in the trail of sources, somebody has been smoking rather a lot of it.
Come on. We need to overthrow more governments. It’s what we do best. And this is certainly no time to stop, now that we have Gitmo up and running.
You wouldn’t want to let that facility go to waste, would you?
There are a collection of pieces to be found using Google’s Spanish-language news search.
So anyone who speaks Spanish might be able to help here. It’s obviously all over the Latin American press.
What I pick up from those headlines (all right all right somebody emailed me are you satisfied now) is that the Chilean police are denying that Spencer is in the country.
On a related matter:
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=358&row=0
“Justice offered up to $67 million of our taxpayer money to ChoicePoint in a no-bid deal for computer profiles with private information on every citizen of half a dozen nations. The choice of citizens to spy on caught my eye. While the September 11 highjackers came from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Lebanon and the Arab Emirates, ChoicePoint’s menu offered records on Venezuelans, Brazilians, Nicaraguans, Mexicans and Argentines”
I can’t find mention of this anywhere on El Mundo’s website, and vheadlines’ claim to be unbiased is as good as Fox’s to be “fair and balanced.”
so (for once) it doesn’t look like the CIA is about to step on the proverbial rake and get smacked in the face again in LA.
They didn’t even bother to get the title right. CIA doesn’t have undersecretaries, they have division chiefs.
Well, the Moonie Times is reporting the El Mundo story via UPI, so one presumes that either it exists somewhere, or UPI is now reporting vheadlines verbatim.
And ‘undersecretary’ is ‘deputy director’ in some other pieces I’ve dredged up (denying that the said deputy director is in Chile). So my guess is that it’s just a translation thing — in the way that the Spanish prime minister is ‘el Presidente del Gobierno’.
Mike: this search turns it up; El Mundo’s search facility is not to my liking ..
I’ve posted a fairly accurate, if not literal, translation of the basic article that most of the Latam press used to report this.
Daniel, you were pretty dead-on with your conclusions…
This sort of lurid paranoia about any sort of subjectively reformist tendency in Latin America was pretty standard for the CIA (and State Dept.) during the cold war, so the most parsimonious explanation is that the agency’s LA desk is still headed by some aging dinosaur whose reflexes are stuck in 1970.
Doesn’t make it any less worrying, though I’d like to know how they plan to resource any such intervention, what with all the other stuff they’re supposed to be doing.
I find the idea that this is really true so far-fetched that I have to wonder if the original source is Chavez himself. Being the guy that the CIA is afraid of has to be worth some votes.
Sorry to be OT like most, but this got to me:
about to step on the proverbial rake and get smacked in the face
I’ve seen the cartoons too, and they’re funny, but when you actually step on the rake the tines puncture your foot, you get a tetanus shot and you limp for a couple of weeks.
I hear Chavez is ahead by at least 8%, and that sounds like an underestimate (basically people don’t want to change horses in midstream, even discounting the claims of Chavez’ popularity).
I doubt that this would be manufactured by Chavez; his supporters more or less take the hostility of the CIA as a given and wouldn’t be much swayed by such a story — though they might be scared. And since Chavez is nervous about military coups or attacks from Colombia, spreading a story like this would be inclined to make those more likely.
I don’t think the CIA does actually believe this - I think they needed a cover story to justify another coup attempt, and this is the best they could come up with.
Really, this is very sub-par. I’m disappointed! They ought to throw in a few claims about WMD and Drones Capable of Attacking the Homeland like they did last time with Iraq, to make it more “credible”.
Well, OK, something a bit different. The American public may be by and large ill-informed, but they wouldn’t fall for exactly the same story twice in a row, would they?
In the morning, and sober (and having read Mike Derham’s excellent comments which I’ve linked in the update above), this looks very like disinformation, which I’m rather ashamed of having spread.
Yes, when I read it yesterday (it was on most newspapers here), it seemed like a wild rumor. But the probable Chavez victory must worry the Bush administration a bit. Their whole policy towards Venezuela hinges on deposing Chavez. If he wins, they have no policy (and they look like fools).
The scenario you described does look like the kind of scene cooked up to stir up anti-Chavez sentiment. There is an excellent documentary on the failed coup d’etat to overthrow Chavez in 2000; you can link to it here:
http://www.chavezthefilm.com/html/home.htm
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review