(UPDATE: Glenn has taken down the link to the post in question. We all make mistakes. Original post below the fold, edited somewhat.)
I really thought that I could get through the day without commenting on the accusations about John Kerry.
But good lord. There’s a blogger who’s pored through pictures of John Kerry’s interns. He’s found one who looks young, cute and blond, and listed her name and her (disconnected) phone number. (I’m not linking to it. I hope that he takes it down.)
This young woman isn’t running for office. She’s a real person, and there’s no excuse for invading her privacy. There’s absolutely no reason to believe that she’s involved with Kerry. I hope that she gets through these next few days with a sense of humor, because she’s going to need one.
You know why the blogosphere doesn’t get much respect from the traditional press? It’s not because we’re brave and iconoclastic and they resent our freedom. It’s because we pull jackass stunts like this, with no thoughts about the consequences.
Jesus.
You’re absolutely right, Ted — but this is not only shameful, it’s pointlessly shameful. Presumably what Reynolds, and the idiot blogger he links to, want is to discredit Kerry. And maybe Kerry deserves to be discredited. But calling the attention of the whole internet to this one young woman — selected either at random or because said idiot blogger thinks she’s hot — adds nothing whatsoever to the attack on Kerry. It has no purpose, political or otherwise. It’s just mindless blogospherical vandalism.
Glenn Reynolds is not part of my karass. I recommend you make sure he is not part of yours either.
Now if we could just say the same about Mankiw…
delong is right. Reynolds long ago stopped being a net contributor to the world.
Well, looks like Reynolds took the item down. Although his posting it in the first place kinda writes and finishes the book on him, as far as I’m concerned. Amazing what intense partisanship does to people…scratch that, it’s not amazing. Predictable’s a better word.
man, and I thought the ketchup thing was bad.
Good thing the National Enquirer link is still up on his site. I still had lingering questions about whether he was a worthless hack or not.
Well, no I didn’t.
Presumably what Reynolds, and the idiot blogger he links to, want is to discredit Kerry.
…intense partisanship…
Of what party is Glenn a partisan, exactly? The party whose President he disses on a regular basis, and whose Attorney General he routinely calls a bum, and so on ad infinitum? No, you are the real partisans, who can’t conceive of anyone criticizing a Democrat without being a bought-and-paid-for operative. Instead of working up a lip-lather, you could just send Glenn an email when he posts something that bugs you. He took down this latest misdemeanor because someone did exactly that.
What part of “Insta-Pundit” do you not understand? Glenn works fast and deals in a fair amount of gossip, having to do with the personal and political fortunes of the governing class. He also revises and responds fast, giving bandwidth and exposure to people who disagree with him, and in this case removing something he regretted posting in the first place. He even apologized. Wow, what a vicious propagandist!
Irony: Crooked Timber is now the one high-traffic blog where you can learn there’s someone out there to harrass. As Glenn says, anyone can look this stuff up on Google…
[T]he blogosphere doesn’t get much respect from the traditional press…because we pull jackass stunts like this, with no thoughts about the consequences.
Actually, they hold us in contempt, because when it comes to jackass stunts, we are but amateurs and pikers.
This is absolutely disgraceful. A new low for Reynolds. I am writing to MSNBC to demand that he be fired and I recommend that you all join me. It might not be a bad idea to write to UT as well and let them know what their so-called “law professor” is up to.
When you sink deeper into the slime than Drudge, it’s time to take a long, hard look at yourself in the mirror.
Dipnut:
Hey, it was a cheap shot. Seeing someone idly link to garbage like that kind of merits one; christ, it’s not like it requires a lot of soul-searching to realize that the post at the heart of this discussion was a stupid, zero-class thing to do. Or to continue doing; I have no idea if the point-post-and-giggle over pictures of interns is still going on, nor do I really care. Stumbling over net circle-jerks isn’t something I enjoy doing.
And I don’t speak for — and I’m not representative of — every single Democrat, much as I’d like to do.
——————————
Neil:
I think demanding that he be fired or whatever is too harsh. Everybody makes mistakes, everybody says and does stupid things online, and it’s not like Reynolds is hosting pictures or repeating phone numbers or anything like that. His link is gone, and to his credit it was gone quickly. Calling him stupid and avoiding his page works for me.
Frankly, I only find out about what Instapundit posts by reading how outraged he makes some of us.
He was the first blogger I read, and the second I categorized as a propagandist. He had some good stuff linked sometimes but finding it was like bobbing for apples in the sewer.
Forgive my bluntness, but I don’t understand the problem.
First, why should you care about another website pulling a tabloid stunt? It’s not on your web site. Or is this the same kind of argument like “the internet doesn’t get respect because of paedophiles”? The “blogosphere” means nothing, you might as well start talking of a “mobilesphere” that includes everyone using a mobile. What they say on it has nothing to do with what they’re using.
The means of communication does NOT define the content.
Second thing I don’t get. Why, in 2004, do you still get upset if some US Presidential candidate had or might have had an affair or twenty?
If you don’t like the tabloid stunt, then at least you shouldn’t give a toss about the claim. If you care so much about both, then congratulations, you’re the perfect tabloid reader, so don’t complain! :D
MC, Instapundit matters just like Rush matters. Too many people listen to each, and take them seriously.
I am glad Glenn removed the post. And let’s face it, Glenn is a lot less ideologically obsessed and partisan than most of CT’s contributors are.
I get the feeling asg thinks ‘partisan’ means ‘prominently endorses views I disagree with’, because that’s the only way Instapundit could be less partisan than most of us at CT - me being a possible exception ;)
Instapundit links to Crooked Timber and DeLong. Crooked Timber and DeLong do not link to Instapundit. While this may not tell you everything you need to know, it says lot. It says that tolerance is a difficult thing and some can do it and some can not.
Can some one point to the baselines? What are the ideas that someone expresses that make all of their other pronoucement unexceptable? How does one get kicked out of the club? Please tell.
We, er, do link to Instapundit, under the law section. He just doesn’t get a headline billing. If we really wanted to be partisan I guess we’d (a) get rid of his link and (b) remove Volokh, OxBlog, Libertarian Samizdata and others from the ‘Lumber Room’. I think both those things would be mistakes, and there hasn’t been much uprising to do either around here.
“Forgive my bluntness, but I don’t understand the problem.
First, why should you care about another website pulling a tabloid stunt? It’s not on your web site.”
Please rewrite. This is not intelligible in its present form.
No, you are the real partisans, who can’t conceive of anyone criticizing a Democrat without being a bought-and-paid-for operative.
I can. Do I get a cookie?
I seem to remember something about publishing a young woman’s personal information, rather than Democrats…
Oh, well, gone now. Noise too high, signal too low. Or maybe that was the idea.
Instapundit links to Crooked Timber and DeLong. Crooked Timber and DeLong do not link to Instapundit. While this may not tell you everything you need to know, it says lot
It tells me someone needs to explore the “Find” function under his browser’s “Edit” menu.
Brian, sorry about that. I didn’t notice the links on my first view and I was still mad about DeLong’s comment above and didn’t take a good enough look. But DeLong’s comment makes for a good example. I think that Brad DeLong is a big fat idiot(Apologies to Al Franken), but I read his blog every week. Why? Becasue no matter what I think of Brad, he writes about things that you’ve got think about and address. You don’t have to like someone to listen and you should listen to as many voices as possible.
And what’s a “karass” anyway?
In the teachings of Bokonon (and the religion of Bokononism), a karass is a group of people who, wittingly or otherwise, share a particular destiny. No, that’s not quite right. Basically, the idea is that God has a plan, and the members of the karass ensure it goes forward. In Cat’s Cradle, the narrator’s karass fulfills God’s intention with hilarious results.
The karass “pivots” around a wampeter, a physical object essential to the plan. Any group of people which is not a karass (for instance, the maintainers of Crooked Timber) is a granfalloon. And all of this is foma, or lies.
As for Brad deLong, this “not part of my karass” business is his answer to everything. De-link, don’t read it, shut your ears, blah blah blah I’m not listening.
Whatever. Membership in any given karass is not a matter of choice.
One comment, and only one, takes up the real person whose safety and privacy were threatened by the originating post, everybody else gets all frothy on procedural sanctions and definitional jots and tittles.
Anybody who’s spent more than 45 minutes on the ‘net knows there are rabid and nasty minds out there - a teeming, festering mass of them, actively seeking vulnerable targets.
To expose anyone to that sick horde, even potentially, who has in no wise sought out that exposure, is not just a breach of protocol, it’s criminal, it is the thing for which the designation of acts as crimes was first instituted.
Whether there are statutes that apply, or codes of etiquette and deportment, whether there is reciprocity of blog “presence”, is trivial beside that.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review