I’m not sure why Josh Chafetz thinks it ironic that the distribution the Guardian’s Dear George letters doesn’t line up with data from opinion polls (data that the paper itself reports on). The mix of letters printed in a newspaper should be broadly representative of the correspondence it receives, not public opinion in general. Guardian readers are more likely than not to oppose Bush’s policies and this seems to be a minority view at present. While that might make Josh happy, I don’t see how it’s ironic.
Fair enough. I’ve attached an update to the post agreeing that it’s not actually ironic at all. Thanks for keeping me honest!
The ICM/Guardian poll is suspicious as hell though - on pretty much every single issue there is a big shift from previous months towards Blair/newlabour/etc. etc. Unless confirmed by another pollster this looks like a very unfortunate case of ICM accidentally surveying the entire membership of Sedgefield Young Labour (or whatever).
Cheers Josh. On OxBlog you say
Kieran writes that “The mix of letters printed in a newspaper should be broadly representative of the correspondence it receives, not public opinion in general,” which is true, but irrelevant, since the “Dear George” letters were actively solicited by the newspaper.
Um, how is it irrelevant? Regardless of whether the letters are actively solicited or not, the paper still receives a batch of letters from its readers. It should then print a representative sample of them. Because all the letters are written by a sample of Guardian readers, they’ll still differ systematically from a sample of letters the general public would write. The fact that the paper solicted letters on this particular topic doesn’t matter at all. It’s just a question of being clear about what the printed letters are supposed to be a representative sample of. In this case, it’s “all of the letters that we solicited on the topic of Bush’s visit” rather than “the general public’s views about Bush’s visit.”
Well, they solicited the letters from specific people. (Probably not all of them Guardian readers, in fact — I doubt the Guardian is Michael Portillo’s paper of choice.) So, while they may have printed a representative sample of the letters they received, the letters they received are some subset of the letters they specifically requested. That seems to me to be different than the normal situation where letters come in on their own and an editor chooses a representative sample to print.
But, anyway, this is a quibble, I think. You’re absolutely right on the overall point.
This thread contains the best thinking I’ve ever seen from Josh Chafetz.
Well, they solicited the letters from specific people.
Fair enough, I see your point. So we basically agree — well, isn’t that iro— Never mind :-)
From what I have read of Chafetz, he seems to enjoy positing alternate realities. Perhaps he should realize that the criteria a newspaper publisher uses in determining what letters to publish may not correspond to his, and may not result in the publication of numbers of letters representing opinions conforming to opinion polls.
Yes newspapers are usually partisan in one way or another. Yet when confronting newspaper editors with this, they usually deny this.
Try to write to The Guardian and ask them whether they are left-wing — I’m sure they’ll reply that they’re “centrist” or so.
Also, newspapers should not only care about their (vocal) readership, but also trying to reach out to the wider public (and, if you like, potential readership).
Anyway, I doubt that even a majority of Guardian readers is really opposed to the Bush visit or considers him as somehow evil.
Letters to the editor merely reflect the radicalized margins — they are not representative of the readers as a whole.
The Guardian is far too elitist to be simply branded as “left-wing”.
Which is probably why I read it.
Here’s an article more representative of moderation from the rag in question:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1086208,00.html
It’s pretty good.
Lots of Guardian writers publish their email address, which I like, and most of them reply to email, which I also like. Including Sidney Blumenthal, nice.
So you sure can ask them. My favorite paper, it doesn’t shill as the NYT does.
Actually, that piece was in the Observer. If you want real unsolicited letters to the editor, try the New York Times. I don’t know if they shill or not, as it’s a new word to me.
Oh, I agree — The Guardian is a great newspaper (the same is true for The Observer. In fact, I like the Guardian considerably more than I like that irritating minority of activist Guardian readers. I only wish Guardian editors would stop (at least sometimes) to speak only to the people left of the left.
Guardian reader writes: “Try to write to The Guardian and ask them whether they are left-wing —I’m sure they’ll reply that they’re “centrist” or so.”
Have you actually tried this, or is it a supposition? Somehow I can’t picture the editorial staff of the Guardian claiming to be centrist. But of course that’s just a supposition too.
“Letters to the editor merely reflect the radicalized margins — they are not representative of the readers as a whole.”
Do you mean letters to the Guardian, or letters to the editor in general? Re the Guardian, I’ve had two letters published. In both cases, I was arguing a more moderate position than the journalist whose article I was commenting on.
Cheers
Excellent site! Great job guys! Thank you!
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review