Speaking of spirituality designed to get one out of going to church, I offer you the following passage from Stephen Potter’s superlative Lifesmanship. This could very well come in handy if you are ever invited to the sort of English country house where everyone is expected to go to church on Sunday. (I know little about such things, but my reading of Wodehouse leads me to additionally suggest that you not get involved in a church fête of any kind, in any capacity.) Potter:
The man who lets it be known that he is religious is in a strong life position. There is one basic rule. It is: go one better. Fenn went too far. This is his method—in his own words:To take the most ordinary instance, the simple Sunday churchgoer. “Are you coming to church with us?” my host says. It is a little country church, and my host, Moulton, who has some claims to be a local squire, wants me to come, I know, because he is going to read the lesson. He reads it very well. He enjoys reading it. I heard him practising it to himself immediately after breakfast.
“Yes, why don’t you come to church for once, you old sinner?” Mrs. Moulton will say.
Do not mumble in reply to this: “No, I’m afraid…I’m not awfully good at that sort of thing…my letters…catch post.”
On the contrary, deepen and intensify your voice, lay your hand on her shoulder and say, “Elsa” (calling her by her Christian name for perhaps the first time):
“Elsa, when the painted glass is scattered from the windows, and the roof is opened to the sky, and ordinary simple flowers grow in the crevices of pew and transept—then, and not till then will your church, as I believe, be fit for worship.”
Not only does this reply completely silence opponent; but it will be possible to go out and win ten shillings on the golf course, come back very slightly buzzed from Sunday pre-lunch drinks, and suggest, by your direct and untroubled look, before which their glance may actually shift, that your host and hostess, however innocently, have only been playing at religion.
Potter is a genius, and it seems his books are coming back in print! Now millions more can learn those methods of winning without actually cheating so dear to my heart and to those of fellow Yeovil alums.
Great minds and all that … Robert Irwin speculates on whether it “was not possible that Potter had learnt something from Gibran” in his review.
D’oh! that’ll teach me to not read the linked wossname. I guess I’ll leave it up anyway, as an elucidation.
I must have read all of Stephen Potter’s books some fifty years ago and that particular little piece occasionally pops back into my head out of nowhere. They’re still the funniest things I’ve ever read.
But! If you accept all that Quakerish stuff about the great open-air church, what would happen to the Great Sermon Handicapped Betting?
Yeovil is awesome and Gatling-Fenn is awesome and dolphin-breasted Paulette Odoreida is awesome. Out here in Hollywood I buy copies of the Complete Upmanship (used) and give them as gifts, but no one shares my enthusiasm. To be expected, I suppose.
I must confess that I’ve never met a very religious person in my life who that routine would work on. They would unleash their religious-fu on you and destroy you. While a more social churchgoer would say ‘that’s nice, now come to church’.
Also, you’ll never be invited back. (Which might be what you want). Casting aspersions on someone’s religion is generally the best possible way to be thrown out on one’s ass.
I must confess that I’ve never met a very religious person in my life who that routine would work on.
True, but it’s not aimed at very religious people. It’s aimed at people who don’t think much about religion but go to church because it’s what Respectable People do - a classic, albeit long vanished, British type.
that’s right; this is meant to work on nominal Christians.
Allow me to mention the churches in Spain and Italy that barred my entry because my fellow traveler insisted on her right to bare arms (and shoulders).
belle:
At the risk of over-explaining the joke, it’s not so much ‘nominal Christians’ as a particular stereotyped Church of England attitude. On the one hand, the squire is expected to play a leading role in village life, which centres around the village church. On the other hand, actual religious enthusiasm is incompatible with the ‘stiff upper lip’ and theology is ‘high-brow’. The result is that village squires go to church and feel jolly solemn when they read the lesson but don’t actually think about religion at all. The point of the gambit is to make them feel like ‘nominal Christians’ whether they are or not.
jim:
You do know those aren’t the same kind of churches?
“win ten shillings on the golf course”
That takes me back. Before you were born, I think, Belle.
Jim,
God may have replaced the commandments with the amendments for the Muricans, but those Yurpean churches are stuck in the past till God has convinced the Pope to do the same.
When I was a pagan I had the highest contempt for Jerry Falwell. I had never heard him speak or read any of his liturature. I just had heard what others said about the man. My wife became a Christian and tuned into his TV show while I was doing some calculus homework. I half listened and found that politically we were very close.
My point is, if you never go to an Evangelical service you don’t know what Evangelicals are. You just hear the stereotypes of 3 headed monsters that keep their wome barefoot and pregnant etc.
See for yourself. And if your in my house I’ll make sure your home in time for Sunday football!
Back in the days of fountain pens, Potter’s advice to lend the pen when asked but hold on to the cap so the person your lend it to cannot then pocket it was amazingly simple and effective. Does not work so well with ball points (but I still always keep the cap if there is one) but their loss is less traumatic.
I read them when I was fifteen, then again about twenty years later; delighted to find how much had gone straight over my head the first time (like the footnote about Tom Driberg).
Okay, John Kozak, please tell us what the footnote said!
For those who do not know. Tom Driberg was a Labor MP and— I believe — junior cabinet minister and also gay. He wrote a memoir called Ruling Passions (published posthumously). I recall someone at the Spectator magazine, perhaps in a review of that book, talked about meetings as a reporter with Driberg in pubs, where Driberg would arrive with a young male “constituent” to whom Driberg would give a few pounds to play the fruit machines while he and the reported talked.
(From memory, so apologies for any errors) One of the books has a section on second homes, with a discussion of when these should be called “cottages” and when “houses”. A footnote to this says something like: “For a more detailed treatment, see ‘Cottagemanship’ by our Parliamentary correspondent, Mr Tom Driberg”.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review