I resisted temptation for a while, but have finally launched into a project on blogs with two graduate students in our Media, Technology and Society PhD program, Jason Gallo and Sean Zehnder. We are focusing on political blogs in particular. This raises a whole set of methodological questions. A big one has to do with sampling. We have decided that we would not focus on a random sample of blogs, not only because that is just about impossible to achieve, but more importantly because that is not our focus. We are interested in the most widely read political blogs. (Yes, there remains the question as to what counts as a political blog in the first place, that is just one of the many questions we are grappling with.)
One way of finding prominent political blogs (or prominent blogs of any type) is to look through the links of prominent blogs we already know about. However, since linking is one of the questions we are interested in, it seems problematic to rely only on that method to find blogs relevant for our study. The same concern applies to using Technorati as a method for finding prominent political blogs. Another idea is to run searches on certain political topics and “blog” or “weblog” and see what we find. Of course, in such cases we are left wondering how widely read the particular blogs are, especially if they do not have comments turned on (and in any case, number of comments is a very limited measure of how widely read a blog may be). Other methods we have thought of is to look at directory listings (such as Yahoo!’s) of political blogs for ones we may have missed using the other methods.
So to sum up: What other approaches should we be using to identify political blogs? What methods do people recommend for identifying “top” political blogs?Also, if people know of political blogs that don’t seem to get mentioned here much, please feel free to post away. I realize this method of collecting information mirrors many of the shortcomings mentioned above, but hopefully by using all these approaches, we can get a reasonable sample (or dare I say population) of the most widely read political blogs. Thanks!
You could do a lexis-nexis search to find the blogs that receive the most print references.
This has the advantage of being data that is external both to the blogs themselves and their delivery medium (unlike counting links or looking at portal references).
It has the obvious disadvantage of reflecting only the blog-reading habits of a specific subgroup (ie, print journalists). You could argue either side of the question of whether this is a misrepresentative subgroup or a superrepresentative subgroup.
You could use tools like Technorati or Lexis-Nexis to narrow your list of potential blogs down then contact the authors themselves for their site statistics.
I’d start with the “Truth Laid Bear” ecosystem Top 100. It ranks by links to, and also by traffic.
Start at the top and work your way down. Decide what counts as “political”.
There are, of course, a number of well-known indices-to-blogs. For example, The Truth Laid Bear tracks blogroll references between blogs: this gives you a fairly good popularity measure.
There are certainly errors in his measure (BlogShares is not a blog, for example), but there’s no question that his top ten blogs are certainly within the “top” twenty of all blogs.
http://www.truthlaidbear.com/ecosystem.php
I use the word “top” fairly loosely, though. I realize you’re asking a slightly different question, that of “most read”. That’s a tough term—I really don’t know how to operationalize it.
Clearly, hit count won’t cut it: I read CT with Bloglines via RSS. Which means that you record far fewer than one hit for me (because everyone on bloglines who reads CT shares the RSS hit); it means that you record too many hits (because Bloglines pings your feed fairly frequently).
Just as clearly, link-based methods don’t cut it, because the populations of “linkers” is different than the population of “readers.” As is, I suspect, the population of “journalists,” as globecanvas points out.
Maybe you could do a search for political weblogs with google, Eszter. Multitasking.
I think the main TTLB Ecosystem suffers from the same problem as Technorati — it’s based on numbers of links (and thus is mostly sensitive to how many bloggers read you). But the traffic rankings at TTLB seem like a good semi-independent measure of popularity.
I liked this political blogmap idea a lot, if it had grown and was updated, I guess it could be some use.
I agree on the Technorati suggestion, but you should also check Daypop, it lists the top blogs by citation which, combined with traffic ranking, is probably the best method to see which websites are more influential.
But why do you have to be so elitist and stick to the top ones? :)
I hope at least you won’t be nationalist and include non-US blogs too.
Maybe you could take into consideration also the Guardian picks.
Thanks for the suggestions. Just fyi, the TTLB traffic rankings seem to depend on sites using SiteMeter, which means that a bunch of quite popular blogs are not listed. Nonetheless, both that and the Ecosystem are helpful additional sources.
Re Mallarme’s suggestion about contacting bloggers, for now we’re staying away from getting in touch with people. We may explore that later in the project, but not right now.
Good idea about Lexis Nexis as well.
The decision to include the more popular blogs is not about elitism, but about the questions we are asking. And to be sure, by “most popular”, we don’t just mean ones read by tens of thousands of people per se. Also, regarding US vs non-US blogs, this also has to do with our research questions. We are pretty sure we won’t be restricting the group of blogs to US blogs, but for now we are mainly interested in commentary about US politics. This could be expanded. Like many other projects, the more we think about it the more possibilities arise.
We welcome additional suggestions!
>Also, if people know of political blogs
>that don’t seem to get mentioned
>here much, please feel free to post away
An excuse for a shameless plug I can’t resist: perfect.co.uk">perfect.co.uk
Google: “Bush Lies” and “Kerry Flip-Flops”.
How many do you want,dozens,hundreds? It wasn’t clear. Do you want non-American political blogs?
Political Theory blogs? Political News Aggregators? Partisan chat-rooms?
Good questions, Bob. We are not setting a limit on the number right now, first we want to see what we have. We’re interested in political commentary for the most part about US politics (for the most part).
How are you defining “political blog”? I ask, because I know a number of bloggers who regularly post on political topics, but either they do not do so exclusively, or the topics are political but not in the form of “breaking news.” (e.g. feministe)
As I mentioned, the definition of what counts as a political blog is also up for discussion. It is certainly not restricted to blogs discussing “breaking news” only, nor is it restricted to blogs that only talk about political topics. So, for example, even though there’s much non-political content on CT, CT would still count because there are plenty of posts having to do with political issues. We haven’t yet decided what proportion of posts would have to do with political topics (again, broadly defined) in order for the blog to count as a political blog for our purposes.
Have you tried searching on vivismo? Their clustering methodolgy may help you a bit.
1)
I don’t now much about their methodology, but Blogstreet has a “100 Most Influential” list. That would probably be another good place to start the weeding process.
Maybe you could ask people to nominate their “top ten” political blogs, and cull from that group?
Separate the two parts of the problem: (1) find large numbers of blogs with claims to be political (2) decide on rules for deciding what counts as “political” for your purposes, and why, and then worry about how to count popularity, probably looking at several methods.
If you initially aim for comprehensiveness, you’ll keep looking, using all these suggested techniques, until eventually you realize you’re only getting pointed to blogs you’ve already counted. Then with the universe covered, you can figure out how to decide which ones are political. And if you keep track of the myriad referrals, from people, email, links, blogrolls, etc. then you’ll have a lot of information on popularity already, and can do other things like ask the owners for additional data. It doesn’t distinguish hypothesis formation from data collection, but as pioneers your first task is defining the problem and universe to examine.
To limit the project, I suggest choosing a time-slice, so that at some point you’re open to taking retrospective data without counting every new blog added each day. And of course, keep us posted periodically please!
You could try this Alexa page or others - Alexa claims to estimate traffic by measuring the behaviour of people who use their add-on software (it reports - benignly - back to HQ).
Of course it isn’t rigorous but it’s the only source of public traffic data I know of that measures the traffic of low traffic sites. Though you could ask people like Comscore if they have any data.
On a similar subject, how would people try to sample the much broader field of home pages and weblogs in the UK - to be more precise “sites that are not primarily in furtherance of professional goals (eg online CVs, galleries of art from artists etc), are not explicitly temporary, are substantially the work of a single individual, and are not closed to the public either explicitly (through a password) or implicitly (for example collections of photos from an event without an accompanying narrative that are only meant to be accessed by a small group for a short time even if they are openly available online).”
I thought about sampling randomly from directories compiled by Geocities or Freeserve/Wanadoo but I looked and it seems they no longer index their pages. Using Yahoo or DMoz would introduce obvious biases because submission is not automatic. Tripod still does have directories of its UK users but how representative would Tripod users be of all users? Searching for “personal home page uk” in Google gets me nowhere.
How should I balance blogs with home pages? Using the stats from Pew suggests I should include about one blog for every four home pages…
While I think about it - are you tacitly wanting commentary about US politics by Americans? If so how do you plan to separate them from weblogs from elsewhere commenting on US politics?
P.S. There used to be a master directory of Blogger weblogs. Is there still? I couldn’t find it on their site.
Is there any up to date info on the relative popularity of the various weblogging platforms?
what is your research question?
Alexas is decent for somethings, but it doesn’t help at all with blogger blogs.
Take a look at BlogLines, which is a terrific web-based blog reader service. It has a lot of user info that’s shared with other users. It’s mostly reflecting subscriptions to RSS feeds (as opposed to traffic measured from the blog’s perspective by hits or links). I’d bet the founder, Mark Fletcher, would be quite interested in discussing your research program. His personal blog is wingedpig.com.
In connection with the point about how much # of comments means, consider this absurdity:
http://www.laze.net/fait/archive/2002/07/28/maurys_blooper.php
Doesn’t seem that even the people who leave comments read that website!
This Memorial Day weekend’s sudden attention to the letter by Sharon Underwood about her gay son would make a good test case for following a meme around the echo chamber. I’ve done a little playing with this idea at http://home.pacbell.net/mabjo/martha.html#490 .
Some blogs that are less widely read are relatively influential. Check out Blogstreet, which weights blogs according to the prestige of those who link to them.
http://blogstreet.com/
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review