Today’s FT devotes almost half a page to the Irish presidency of the EU, which starts on January 1st and will be accompanied by a collective sigh of relief at the end to Berlusconi’s embarrassing ‘reign’ which “began with him comparing a German MEP to a Nazi camp guard and ended with the collapse of the stability pact and the diastrous EU summit in Brussels”.
The FT hits on a subject close to my heart; the big role that smaller countries play in greasing the wheels of the European machine. They also interview Ireland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Brian Cowen, who contradicts recent reports that the Irish would kick the stalled constitution talks into the long grass. (I can’t find that one in the online FT - it’s on page 3 of the European paper edition though.) Brian Cowen, who is widely acknowledged to be very smart and very astute, says that the team Ireland brings to the presidency has recent and deep experience in the extremely tricky negotiations on Northern Ireland. We also bring to the table a prime minister, Bertie Aherne, who, while no great visionary, is a superb deal-maker. And (cleverly, I think), Cowen says straight off the bat that any verbal deals struck with Berlusconi will expire with the Italian presidency on 31 December. The Irish will start with the constitution in its current draft, and a clean slate. So, if negotiations can be re-started soon enough, it’s possible that Ireland just might deliver the constitution.
But what do small countries bring to the EU decision-making process in general?
The FT readily acknowledges that the worst presidencies in recent years were Chirac’s and Berlusconi’s. Small countries, e.g. Ireland, Denmark, Finland, etc. have had extraordinarily successful EU presidencies the last few times, and manage to get through lots of difficult institutional business that might otherwise remain stalled. Which is why getting rid of the rotating presidency was such a bad idea. Without it, a lot of high-level EU business simply would not get done.
What do the small countries have going for them?
First off, they’re not competing with the big players, and so manage the ‘honest broker’ role far better than France, Germany, UK, Spain or Italy can. Smaller countries don’t have the major strategic interests of the big ones, and they’re not running off in triumvirates, or quadriviates or what have you every 5 minutes and declaring themselves the engine of Europe. And, probably because multilateral institutions are small countries’ only means to have any say, we work doubly hard to make sure these institutions actually work.
Secondly, most of the small countries (let’s pass swiftly over Belgium) don’t have the the colonial baggage that tends to complicate both EU and external affairs. Nor do they have the accompanying perceptions of themselves that demand obeisance from the enlargement countries and others. It helps you to keep clicking through the agenda when you haven’t already annoyed everyone in the room by simply turning up and clearing your throat.
So there are strategic reasons why the small countries do such a good job of ‘chairing’ Europe. But led me add a few intangibles to the mix.
It’s impossible to imagine a leader with the breath-taking arrogance of a Chirac, Giscard d’Estaing or Berlusconi emanating from a country where everyone knows you failed 2nd Arts and only got the nomination because your older brother had better things to do. Small country leaders are simply unable to become so removed from the reality of every day life, and the expectation of simple good manners, because in small countries it’s much harder to insulate yourself in this way. (fewer degrees of separation, less of the lavish trappings of power) Having an elevated view of your own personal importance, and that of the country you lead, is a severe handicap when it comes to chairing a meeting to general satisfaction and actually getting things done.
Then there’s the experience internationally of being the leader, or a senior minister, of a small country. Every concession you get is hard won, but is achieved through persuasion and quick manouevring rather than the banging of fists on tables. When it comes to managing the egos and work programmes of an EU presidency, the ability to swim like a minnow around and between the big country whales and sharks of Europe is absolutely invaluable.
Ireland has done a particularly good job of having a big say for such a small country, and not just in the EU. It helps to be just about the only wealthy, white, English-speaking country in the world that everyone still seems to think is an oppressed, if charming, minority. A friend of mine also insists that the Irish have done so well internationally because there is nothing like growing up in a large family to teach you how to think and act tactically and strategically. (if so, our falling birth rate will put an end to that.) Certainly, the Irish have never seen an international institution they didn’t like, and wouldn’t want their friends and family to join. We pop up all the time on the lists of over-represented countries in international organisations.
But I hope I’ve managed to show there are lots of practical reasons why small countries are so essential to grease the wheels of international juggernauts (setting aside for the moment whether it’s a good thing that these institutions work or work well). And let’s not forget, that as of 1st May next year, small countries will be in the majority of EU member states. We’re loud, we’re proud, and we’re here to stay…
Your thoughts are enthusiastically solicited - especially views that perhaps paint a less benign picture of small countries’ role (begging bowl anyone?) as I’m hoping to help the 21st Century Trust organise a conference in Ireland in early 2005 on the international role of small countries.
Great post.
“It helps you to keep clicking through the agenda when you haven’t already annoyed everyone in the room by simply turning up and clearing your throat.”
Amen. A problem permanently facing the England rugby team. Wales? France? Australia?
Who went ahead and declared the Irish white?
Small country leaders are simply unable to become so removed from the reality of every day life, and the expectation of simple good manners, because in small countries it’s much harder to insulate yourself in this way. (fewer degrees of separation, less of the lavish trappings of power)
cough Haughey! Haughey! cough Haughey!
sorry, got a nasty haugheying cough there.
“Small country leaders are simply unable to become so removed from the reality of every day life, and the expectation of simple good manners, because in small countries it’s much harder to insulate yourself in this way.”
Now that’s a fascinating idea. I wonder how you would test that.
One good way to test it would be to give the Taoiseach of such a country a never-ending stream of bribes from a supermarket operator and see if it went to his head or not …
“Small country leaders are simply unable to become so removed from the reality of every day life, and the expectation of simple good manners, because in small countries it’s much harder to insulate yourself in this way.”.
People make essentially the same argument about how small U.S. states are better governed than big ones, and why it’s a good thing that Iowa and New Hampshire have a disproportianately large role in picking the presidential nominee. Based on California and New York state politics it makes some sense, but I don’t have enough experience (i.e., any) living in really small states to know for sure. Their senators seem just as bad as ours, though.
Brian Cowen, who is widely acknowledged to be very smart and very astute
Which is why he is widely known as BIFFO. Or maybe his stature has grown since I kept up with news about him. :)
Ok, ok, Haughey is a very notable and unpleasant exception. Who I can’t believe I didn’t think of… (cue embarrassed shuffle)
De Valera had a touch of the high-calling, high-office too, though I believe his manners were just fine.
How about we say, then, leaders of small countries, with the exception of some Fianna Fail taoisigh, tend to be less rude and up themselves? Now would that be an easier hypothesis to test?
As to BIFFO - I dunno, but I think it’s more BC’s appearance than anything else that gave rise to that term. (Though it is a goldie. For the uninitiated, BIFFO was the epithet given to Ireland’s minister for foreign affairs, and it stands for Big Ignorant F&cker From Offaly.) But I’ve heard good things about him from across the parties in the last couple of years.
I suppose the Commonwealth is one multilateral organisation that Ireland has not great desire to join, and NATO, but these are hiosrtorical anomalys I’m sure.
Doe syou hypothesis also go for the President’s of Commission, I rather think not - Prodi notwithstanding who has been an unalloyed chump - I would suggest that the bog country Presidents have been on the whole better than there small country counterparts.
No grand theory as to why as of yet but I will be working on it.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review