As Dan Drezner and I noted in our Foreign Policy article, the blogosphere is surprisingly bad at providing information on politics outside the US. Ethan Zuckerman’s research provides evidence that the blogosphere’s interests track those of traditional media, and that in some ways it does a worse job than traditional media in covering world politics. Some argue that right wing blogs do a better job than left wing ones in taking account of international politics - I doubt that it’s true. With a few prominent exceptions (such as Greg Djerejian’s Belgravia Dispatch), right wing blogs, like most of their left wing equivalents, tend to focus almost exclusively on prominent stories that support their domestic political preferences.
Which is a long-winded way of saying that blogs like the newly created UN Dispatch can fill an unmet need, giving us a take on the UN that isn’t limited to cheap gotchas about corruption and sex scandals. It’s being run by Peter Daou, whose Daou report has just moved to Salon, and it looks to be a very interesting and useful resource. UN Dispatch is run out of Ted Turner’s UN Foundation, so it can be expected to take a broadly pro-UN line - but on first glance, it appears to be rather stronger on actual factual information about the strengths and weaknesses of the UN than any of the other blogs opining on UN-related issues. One that I’ll be reading.
I think part of the problem with the blog culture is the echo-chamber aspect- the reinforcing of the group mentality and focusing on a specific set of issues based on what is available in the news.
It’s something I think about when people laud the superiority of blogs to journalism. Of course, Fafblog says it better with Giblets’s posts on the all-conquering Blogosphere.
I am happy to see a blog about the UN. It is hard to maintain a blog limited to one topic, at least it was for me. They should have plenty of material, though.
blogs like the newly created UN Dispatch can fill an unmet need, giving us a take on the UN that isn’t limited to cheap gotchas about corruption and sex scandals
Isn’t it terrible how those left-wing—er, right-wing blogs only concentrate on the scandals and disasters coming out of Iraq—er, the UN, and ignore all the good news?
Simon’s law of partisan hackery: if you think a steady diet of warm, soothing, bias-reinforcing “good news” is the slightest bit interesting, you’re guilty of it.
Dan - the point, if you’d care to read the post, isn’t that this blog is providing a direct counterblast to Glenn Reynolds style cheap shots - it’s that the blogosphere is extraordinarily weak on facts about the UN and international politics more generally. I’d be delighted if there were UN-criticizing blogs out there written by people who actually knew something about what the UN does, and what its strengths and weaknesses were. Then we could have a real debate, instead of dimwitted snark and regurgitated talking points.
What do you mean, “politics outside the US “? The domestic politics of many nations are well served by their own bloggers (although perhaps not so accessible outside their native languages).
Your first sentence set me up to rant at length about the US-centricity of assuming that “blogosphere” = US blogs, and then gradually I realised that maybe you’re talking about coverage of the UN. Which is a much narrower field than politics outside the US.
Henry, not only did I read your post, but I even scooted over to the new UN blog for a sample. I stand by my assessment—it’s simply a mirror-image version of any number of pro-US warblogs, replete with fawning stories about “all the good work they’re doing”.
In case you haven’t noticed, the warbloggers, too, like to present themselves as simply addressing the problem that “the blogosphere is extraordinarily weak on facts” about the US occupation of Iraq. My point is that official organs of large organizations like the Pentagon and the UN provide all the happy talk anyone could ever need about them, and blogs that tout such pablum as “information” are providing nothing of value to the blogosphere.
…the blogosphere is surprisingly bad at providing information on politics outside the US…
Gee, you think?
Certainly an exception (that proves the rule?) of the parochial nature of the blogosphere is Jonathan Edelstein’s The Head Heeb, wherein he does a fantastic job of monitoring events in sub-Saharan Africa, the South Pacific as well as offering erudite commentary on political events in Israel and Palestine. There are others who report regularly on individual countries or areas of the world consistently if one looks for them but the Head Heeb remains a singular and remarkable resource of quite underreported areas (and this does include Israel).
I think the Head Heeb is superhuman.
As for the UNDispatch, it needs some work.
If you’re reading, Peter —
a) give it a human face (“Dispatcher?”)
b) have a longer blogroll
c) don’t put so much below the fold
d) at least allow trackbacks, eh?
the blogosphere is surprisingly bad at providing information on politics outside the US.
there are a number of blogs in english and french which cover politics in the non-US world, as a matter of fact. i think it’s a question of who reads/links what, rather than what exists to be read.
i mean, i notice the same thing in ct’s book and movie suggestion threads.
i also think that the most popular blogs are the ones that are the most news-of-the-day driven, i.e. that following the major media newscycle more closesly will make a blog more popular, more linked-to etc., which distorts one’s sense of what blogs exist/do.
Barry, yes - Jonathan Edelstein’s blog is a gem - and is one of the ones that I was thinking of when I wrote the post.
Dan - I didn’t want to say this before, but you’re slap-bang in the center of my list of bloggers who rabbit on about international organizations without seeming to actually know much about them (viz. your comments on the CSCE/OSCE in a previous thread, and your claim that Vaclav Havel was only trying to be polite to his hosts when he said that the CSCE was a key part of the collapse of Communist regimes in C-E Europe - a claim which anyone who actually knew much about Havel, his history, and the particulars of that collapse wouldn’t credit for a moment).
Uhm, if I want to read about, say, Australian politics, I go to an Australian blog. If I want to read about, say, Iraqi politics, I go to an Iraqi blog. What is this thing you call “The Blogosphere”? Are you saying that “The Blogosphere” only includes blogs written in the United States of America?!
- Badtux the Internationalist Penguin
Dan - I didn’t want to say this before, but you’re slap-bang in the center of my list of bloggers who rabbit on about international organizations without seeming to actually know much about them
Simon’s second rule of partisan hackery: If you accuse someone of ignorance, and prescribe a cure consisting of regular study from a fully-funded organ of one of your own side’s more strident advocacy groups, then you’re really, really, open-and-shut guilty of it.
I don’t agree with Dan Simon very often, but I’m with him on this one. To judge from what’s on the front page, the “UN Dispatcher” is just puffery. You say “a take on the UN that isn’t limited to cheap gotchas about corruption and sex scandals”, but in fact, it doesn’t include ANY information about corruption or sex scandals, both of which are critically important data when considering a supranational organisation that claims a role as the conscience of all humanity.
So what’s the point of reading it? I don’t read one-sided warblogs — not on either side — because I know they are intentionally trying to deceive me by omission. This UN Dispatcher thing is apparently trying exactly the same trick. File it in the worthless PR file where it belongs, and wait for someone to start a genuinely balanced UN blog that celebrates the good AND exposes the bad. Hey, maybe we could call this practice “responsible journalism”!
But we all know that such a UN blog, especially one enabling comments, would be cut down at the knees within seconds thanks to the hordes dispatched from the usual suspects, don’t we?
I wonder if the new UN blog will say anything about the harmful nationalism that is spreading all around the world.
After 60 years, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council are still unwilling to give up their right to ignore the Charter (veto). And don’t more nations want the veto?
Blogalization is an open, distributed karass of bloggers and other independent Web writers and publishers who post in one or more languages about material discovered in one or more other languages: if I have languages A and B and you have languages B and C, we can share memes across barriers of mutual incomprehension.
Simon’s second rule of partisan hackery: If you accuse someone of ignorance, and prescribe a cure consisting of regular study from a fully-funded organ of one of your own side’s more strident advocacy groups, then you’re really, really, open-and-shut guilty of it.
While, for example, self-evidently bogus claims that Vaclav Havel didn’t mean it when he said that the CSCE played a key role in the demise of Communism in C-E Europe, and was just trying to be polite to his hosts, are neutral statements of fact? Have you read Havel on this?
Dan, your problem isn’t that you’re ignorant - it’s that you’re invincibly ignorant. That is, judging from your previous track record in debate, when you encounter awkward facts, you try to deny them through ad-hoccery rather than reconsidering whether you might actually be wrong. Which means that the practical worth of debating with you is zero. Whether you’re a hack or not, I can’t tell - I don’t know whether you actually believe what you say, or whether you’re deliberately engaging in sophistry. Whichever which way, it doesn’t much matter to me - there’s not much point in arguing with you either way.
Henry, if you want to continue the debate about the CSCE’s role in the East Bloc’s collapse, feel free to leave a comment here—I promise I won’t pummel you with ad hominem insults.
But to return to the topic at hand: what is your view of UN Watch? “Factual information”, or mere “cheap gotchas about corruption and sex scandals”? Enquiring minds want to know.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review