Laura at Apartment 11d posts on the blogosphere as a space for debate:
is the blogosphere a public space, like the New England townhall meeting? Is it a place where individuals can debate ideas and policy proposals and have some impact on political officials?
Perhaps it should be neither. The most attractive ideal for the blogosphere that I’ve come across is in sociologist Richard Sennett’s brilliant, frustrating shaggy-dog of a book, The Fall of Public Man. Sennett is writing about the eighteenth century coffee-house as a place where people could escape from their private lives, reinventing themselves, and engaging in good conversation with others, regardless of their background or their everyday selves. They could assume new identities, try out novel arguments usw. This kind of polity doesn’t so much conduct towards a shared consensus, as allow the kinds of diversity and plurality that Iris Marion Young (who’s heavily influenced by Sennett) talks about in Justice and the Politics of Difference.
I’m quite sure that eighteenth century coffee houses weren’t actually like that (unless you were bourgeois and male) - but Sennett’s arguments are still helpful in understanding how the blogosphere differs from a New England townhall. Like Sennett’s patronizers of coffee shops, bloggers don’t usually know each other before they start blogging, so that it’s quite easy for them to reinvent themselves if they like, and indeed to invent a pseudonym, or pseudonyms to disguise their real identity completely. This has its downside - some bloggers take it as license for offensive behaviour - but in general, if you don’t like a blog, you can simply stop reading it, or linking to it. The blogosphere seems less to me like a close-knit community (there isn’t much in the way of shared values, and only a bare minimum of shared norms), and more like a city neighborhood. An active, vibrant neighborhood when things are working; one with dog-turds littering the pavement when they’re not.
Your link for “some bloggers” who behave offensively links to Laura’s post, which isn’t offensive at all. Your point is surely correct, but I think the link is screwed up.
“there isn’t much in the way of shared values, and only a bare minimum of shared norms”
Income, education, cosmopolitanism, comfort with technology and belief in “progress”…probably a more homogeneous community than we admit to ourselves. Tho the mix of values and norms may be new.
hy must it be like something that no longer is? Why not simply acczept it for what it is, what it does?
Henry, you should have linked to the later post. djw, scroll up to a later post, and you gte a story abuot an offensive anonymous blogger.
Should be fixed now (I must have copied the wrong link the first time around).
Thanks, Henry, for helping me think through this concept. Loved your comparison of the blogosphere to a coffee house.
Yes, it is possible to not read offensive bloggers, but when they attack you, it sure is frustrating to be unable to defend yourself. Even more frustrating when they attack not only your ideas, but your character. Should bloggers be bound to the same rules as the media?
Hi Laura - I very much agree - it’s frustrating and very unpleasant. I don’t know if bloggers should be bound to the same rules as the media, but I don’t have much of a practical alternative, besides trying to jump over aforementioned dog-turds, and muttering maledictions at the people responsible for them. Who was it by the way, or is that something you’d prefer not to get into?
Sennett actually nicks the coffee house thing from Habermas’ ‘Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere’.
Sorry to be a nerd.
It is worth remembering that research has shown that there is a link between structural DECAY and crime. By actively reducing the amount of petty theft, graffitti and dog turds, the knock-on effects are a better neighbourhood for everyone. Even the BAD boys seems less destructive of the neat and tidy.
So it is worth mowing the lawn, repainting the fence, righting the wooden post every now and then. Community action groups and neighbourhood watch really do work.
In the same way, maybe there are some “neat and tidy” activities that can be carried out on a blog that encourage socially constructive behaviour. Social space cleaning.
I don’t see how the post you link at ‘Apartment 11d’ can possibly show that “some bloggers” use a pseudonym “as license for offensive behaviour”. The blogger described is almost certainly Steven Den Beste, who blogs under his own name and does not seem to be primarily interested in giving offensive, though he’s certainly willing to give offense as part of what he has to say.
If your neighbourhood is neat and tidy, but two other neighbourhoods close by are engaged in a tussle, which is affecting their own tidiness, what do you do?
Well, on the one hand, you should leave them alone, as it is not your business or property, and everyone needs to have some freedom to make their own mistakes.
On the other hand, we know that an increase in crime in a nearby neighbourhood could well generate some criminals that might go further afield, and affect us.
Criminal ghettos are acceptable if we can build security fences around our own neighbourhood, so that criminality does not affect us. But to avoid being tarnished at all we would need separate schools, shops and roads.
Dr. Weevil, I didn’t say that the blogger was using a pseudonym - just that the freedom to create a new identity (and not suffer most of the repercussions thereof) sets some people off on a power-kick. Doesn’t necessarily require a pseudonym - just the ability to spout and not have to face much in the way of consequences. I can see how my wording was a bit misleading though.
Can’t say that I’m surprised that it’s Den Beste who’s responsible for this particular turd in the arena of public discourse. Although he’s always struck me as someone who’s less malicious than utterly socially clueless, and unaware of how offensive he very often is.
I dunno. The blogosphere (especially the political blogosphere) frequently seems to me more like a college (or even prep school) dormitory. Sometimes you encounter ideas that really do change your life. More often, though, it’s just a lot posing and shouting about things the shouters don’t have much influence on at all.
I read SDB’s remarks on the survey. The tone was incredulity at the presumption of expecting him to answer such a survey (and maybe a further incredulity that they weren’t reading him all along). That he felt that way doesn’t surprise me as much as his need to proclaim it. I’ve no reason to think that Den Beste isn’t basically an okay guy in person, but he really is the blogosphere’s Comic Book Guy.
What interests me is how quickly our online writings become avatars of our own identity, how we feel a need to respond whatever the criticism, how criticisms in fact feel like attacks, and how easy it is to give in to the temptation to counterattack. To the extent that some people actually imagine that they’re “fighting.” The kinds of connections between blogospherical rhetoric and real life identity might be a philosophically rewarding subject.
“Each blog is not a democracy. It is operated by the whim of its owner. Most of the time that is all fine and good. It is interesting to get different people’s perspectives on the news of the day, their views on the latest movies, and even what their kids said at breakfast. The personality of the blogger is definitely appealing.
But when bloggers personally attack others, who are not public officials or celebrities just private citizens trying to go about their work, this undemocratic creation is deeply troubling.”
I find that last sentence deeply troubling.
henry - it doesn’t really matter who made the remarks or even what the blogger said. I recovered.
I wrote that post just to point out the problems with defending yourself in the blogosphere. Blogging isn’t always a conversation amongst equals. Some have much louder voices, because of their traffic and loyal linkers. Smaller bloggers are in danger of getting gangbanged by the loyal linkers. And some, like my blogless co-author, have no voice whatsoever. She has no outlet to restore her credibility.
Hmmn. The metaphor Laura has is “a conversation amongst equals”. I’d like my blog to be more of a conversation, but that’s not what I set it up to be…more of a public commonplace book.
I cannot say what the metaphor Mr. den Beste is operating under. But it is important to him that a lot of people read his work, otherwise it is not worth doing, as he says here:
http://denbeste.nu/cd_log_entries/2002/04/Lotsoftraffic.shtml
and here:
http://denbeste.nu/entries/00001117.shtml
So I believe that one of Mr. den Beste’s underlying rules is, “If I have more traffic, then I am more important than persons with lesser traffic.”
It sure smarts when you have one metaphor, and somebody else has another, and you talk at cross purposes—or even get yelled at.
Hmnn again. I am sorry, Laura, I can see that the posts in question are annoying, and they have upset you….but I don’t see that you have to take it personally. That is to say, I don’t see that you have been “gangbanged” or that your co-author has lost any credibility. Some man somewhere put some said some rather loud and condescending things about a survey he he was asked to respond to. He also (as we all do, always), revealed more about himself that he told about you. In his statements, he revealed that he is (a) not particularly sophisticated about research methodology in the humanities (b) self-absorbed (“I feel like I am being watched”) © willing to jump to conclusions (he seems to be assuming the survey is only addressed to bloggers of his ilk, not across the spectrum).
I also think the metaphor of the “blogosphere” is a distraction or a misdirection. It gives you the picture of a uniform thing—like the troposphere—but the dizzying array of blogs from the opinon journals to the personal essayist aren’t really one thing.
I don’t think I understand the Steven den Beste part of this discussion. What’s the old story about Bob Dylan being asked what his songs are about, and replying “Some are about three minutes, some are about five minutes, and some are even about 11 minutes …”?
Den Beste is only saying if you want to know why I blog, read me, don’t treat me like a lab rat you can just poke when you please.
He was sent a survey and he blogged his thoughts about it, not really a surprise given that’s what he does. It was unsolicitied mail. If you don’t like it when unsolicited mail you send gets slagged off in public, don’t send unsolicited mail. I don’t see anything offensive in what he wrote, still less anything to warrant the description ‘turd.’
I think the coffee shop and town hall metaphors represent what we think blogging ought to be. And sometimes — such as at CT — it’s a reasonable approximation. But I think most “political” blogs are better described as cathartic screaming.
Isn’t the whole point of the Blogsophere that you can be asoffensive and dont need to be polite - because there’s no danger of cooming to blows?
It seems to me that laura has missed the point - why would the blogpshere exist if it was like a new england town hall/pub/coffehouse when you could go to a townhall/pub/coffehouse instead?
he really is the blogosphere’s Comic Book Guy.
That’s not bad, but what always strikes my mind when I find myself exposed to that man’s ideas and prosie is that he’s the blogosphere’s Ignatius Reilly.
Now that you mention it, SDB does seem unduly concerned with his valve.
I wonder if he writes on Big Chief tablets.
I reckon Laura had every right to send the questionnaire and Beste had every right to respond as he did.
It’s true certain protocols of discourse are emerging in the blogosphere, but they’re organically evolving as per the nature of the medium itself.
However concepts like “credibility” and “right of reply” are still slippery shapeshifting beasts online. But we do know it’s no place for the thin-skinned.
So get over it Laura. Better still, use some contextual judo and put his response in an entertaining and constructive frame.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review