Adam Kotsko comments in a thread about smoking in public:
All the various smoking bans are simply further evidence of the repressive nature of postmodern biopolitics.
Which is fair enough. But my first thought was that I might prefer the repressive methods of postmodern biopolitics to those of, say, modern or feudal biopolitics. I’m just saying.
for the record, I am in favor of smoking bans like California’s (which was a freaking blessing when I lived there and which I much miss) not because of the future health benefits, real though they are, but because of the immediate improvement in the quality of life of the 70% of the population who don’t smoke.
no more unwanted smoke wafting your way at restaurants. no more smokey clothing and hair after a night out at a bar or club. a more pleasant atmosphere — quite literally — in all sorts of public spaces.
it made my life better while I was there.
heck, smoking could be good for you and secondhand smoke concomitantly healthful I’d still support a ban in public. exercise is healthful, but I don’t see restaurants allowing joggers a right of way between tables.
whew. sorry to rant. anyhow, check out the public surveys done after the ban. in the aggregate people like it, mostly for the same reasons.
Honestly, I prefer it to feudalism and modernism, too. In fact, I wish they’d ban something really unhealthy, like cars.
(For the record, I live in the suburbs, commute to school, drive every day, and am part of the problem. It’s easy to throw around this stuff when I know that no one is going to try to implement it.)
If I were really clever, I’d make a Foucaldian remark about social control, but since I’m not, I’ll leave it to someone else. (Chun?) As for the problem with smoky bars, well, when you take away the smoke, what do you get? Sweaty bodies, puke, and other nastiness. As a non-smoker, I still prefer a bar/club be a bit smoky, even if it does make all of my clothes/hair reek.
As an ex-smoker, I prefer smoky bars, because I really like and miss the smell. This seems to separate me from every other ex-smoker I’ve ever met, who almost without exception avoid smoke assidiously, either out of a born-again aversion to it’s nastiness or a fear of temptation.
Sign me up for preferring postmodern biopolitics as well.
I just led a discussion section on (putative) ethical issues involving drugs. We eventually were led to a discussion of the smoking ban in NY, and the students proceeded to give their reasons for and against it. Interestingly, none of these (Ivy League) students knew that the issue, as it was taken up by the legislature, was cast a matter of workers rights, rather than as a general concern about the health of the population at large.
—-
I support the ban: if the number and nature of employment opportunities is to be a function of the personal interests and whims of a populace; and if no one would be unreasonable to turn down one of those scarce jobs out of a concern for the health risks of being constantly exposed to second-hand smoke; then there is strong reason to prefer not imposing those costs on one’s fellow citizens.
Too Rawlsianly Scanlonian?
I’m in an interesting situation in Utah. Utah has a pretty wide-ranging smoking ban—not sure of the details—that goes by the name of the Utah Indoor Clean Air Act. This generally makes me happy, but I also can’t help but link it to the state’s draconian alcohol laws (outside of restaurants and private clubs, you can’t get anything stronger than 3.2% beer), which do not make me happy. Both seem to me to be connected to the fact that the state’s dominant religion forbids both alcohol and tobacco. I’ll leave it to the experts to parse the biopolitics.
I actually am very severely allergic to cigarette smoke (and a few dozen other things, thanks to an immune system gone berserk), and I hate comprehensive smoking bans. They always, always have the same effect: right around the outer edges of the smoke-free area, there’s a gauntlet to run of concentrated smoke. Often it’s intense enough that I choose to skip going wherever it was and see if I can stay home and get it from the net instead. I would much rather have smokers comfortably smoking away inside someplace where I don’t have to cross paths with them.
As an ex-smoker, the only time I can get my ex-hit is to go to these joints and suck up the second-hand goodness.
I only miss smoking after meals, honest, Guv.
First off i think notion of biopolitics in the original quote isn’t quite right. Bio-politics, as embodied in works like Empire is not so much an exclusive politics of the body, what you can and can not inhale and where. It’s the internalization of politics as something which is reproduced in fabric of our lives.
In feudal politics, as well as for example a modern dictatorship, there is very little importance placed on people having internalized the power structures of society. You don’t need to believe in your soul if you can be drawn and quartered for failing to fall in line. What’s more important in a feudal society is that you SAY you believe. Hence all the problems with heretics who declare publicly their disbelief.
But that’s an side issue. The point is i believe it’s not possible to have a NON-postmodern biopolitics. The conception of biopolitics is a product of postmodern (really post-structuralist) thought.
If there were modern or feudal biopolitics, and we were to conceive of biopolitics as something related to our bodies and not our ‘lives’ then you could say that the modern biopolitical punishment would be the jail and the feudal one would be the torture chamber.
Personally my problem with the notion of biopolitics is that it draws to much of a conception power dynamics which preclude the possibility of collectivized resistance.
In the case of smoking bans you need to understand class. This a case where the consumption of the drug tobacco has become an activity of the lower and middle classes. So the biopolitical control exercised is that of controlling the lives of the unkept multitude.
The first wave of smoking bans took place at the same time as the movement for prohibition. They were overturned by a PR movement which spun smoking as feminist. Today the most interesting thing about smoking is the lack of connection between the movement to decriminalize other drugs such as marijuana and preventing the criminalization of smoking tobacco. We could see a day where Marijuana is legal and Tabacco isn’t because their class positions have changed.
Evan: You don’t need to believe in your soul if you can be drawn and quartered for failing to fall in line. What’s more important in a feudal society is that you SAY you believe. Hence all the problems with heretics who declare publicly their disbelief.
First, pleast stop bandying about terms like “feudal” unless you know what the term means. Even at its most all-encompassing-to-the-point-of-meaninglessness, the term has almost nothing to do with belief, and certainly nothing to do with heresy. Since this isn’t a thread on things feudal, I merely suggest reading E.A.R. Brown’s “Tyranny of a Construct,” any of Susan Reynolds’ latter books, or even F-L Ganshof for a range of valid definitions.
As for the smoking — I don’t smoke. Except the very occasional defensive cigarette. As a customer, I hate the smoke, but kind of expect it. After all, I can leave, get a breath of fresh air, etc. But when I was a waitress not too many moons ago, I was often assigned to the smoking section. The difference in the way I felt after a shift in smoking compared to a shift in non-smoking was amazing. After a couple of nights in a row, I couldn’t wear my contacts, and generally woke up coughing. I’m not all that sensitive to smoke, but restaurant workers tend to get a fairly good work out if the place is busy and they’re doing their jobs correctly. That often translates into deeper breathing and no time to get off the floor and out of the smoke. Is minimum wage plus tips (or in some states, $2.75 plus tips) and no health insurance really worth it? It really is a workers’ rights issue, as much as is making sure agricultural workers have protective gear when working with chemicals.
Evan,
In my own defense, I used the word “postmodern” before “biopolitics” for what might be termed pedagogical reasons — since not everyone is familiar with the term “biopolitics” on its own, I added “postmodern” to indicate that it is a distinctively contemporary phenomenon.
I have read Foucault, Agamben, Hardt and Negri, whatever, but I felt it would be ungrateful of me to “correct” Kieran when a) she had given a shout-out to me and b) the very meaning, import, and utility of the term “biopolitics” is very much up for debate in continental theory today (i.e., Foucault didn’t live quite long enough to clarify what he said; maybe we’re just using the term now because of Foucault’s prestige rather than the genuine usefulness or descriptiveness of the term, etc., etc.).
Have a wonderful day, everyone.
Evan,
In my own defense, I used the word “postmodern” before “biopolitics” for what might be termed pedagogical reasons — since not everyone is familiar with the term “biopolitics” on its own, I added “postmodern” to indicate that it is a distinctively contemporary phenomenon.
I have read Foucault, Agamben, Hardt and Negri, whatever, but I felt it would be ungrateful of me to “correct” Kieran when a) she had given a shout-out to me and b) the very meaning, import, and utility of the term “biopolitics” is very much up for debate in continental theory today (i.e., Foucault didn’t live quite long enough to clarify what he said; maybe we’re just using the term now because of Foucault’s prestige rather than the genuine usefulness or descriptiveness of the term, etc., etc.).
Have a wonderful day, everyone.
To be clear, I wholeheartedly support bans in restaurants and bars, for, as ADM makes clear, workers health reasons, decide my rather idiosyncratic and quite unimportant preferences. The anti-paternalist in me bristles at a ban, but he doesn’t win the day.
There was surprisingly little discussion here of Kieran’s main point the post, but it is hard to chew on in a short comment. I join a chorus of those who are overjoyed to be able to join friends in some places where smoking bans give me access to the sites of socialization. My alternatives before were social isolation or nausea for several hours. The result of the bans in Ireland in New York, where the “gauntlet” forms on the streets in in contrast to Japan where many cities or wards are trying hard to ban smoking on the streets. When you are walking to school/work behind hundreds of smokers on crowded streets, believe me, this is much appreciated. As for smoking indoors, with the exception of a few coffee shops like Starbucks and Tully’s, I continue my social isolation by refusing to go to any of the smoky Izakaya restauarants.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review