A wonderful example of framing effects in action. I hear that the USA is going spend $1.5bn on promotion of marriage.
First thought: A billion and a half! That’s a HUGE amount of money! How the hell are you gonna spend that kind of money on marriage counselling?
Second thought: Fifteen bucks per household isn’t going to buy you a lot of marriage counselling.
You too seem taken in! under the guise of saving marriage (who can badmouth that?), Bush is handing out money to faith based groups—tax money to churches…like mass marriage of Moonies!
Third thought: how is the promotion of marriage a function of the federal government?
I think Matt Y. had it right when he proposed that this be used to establish a cabinet-level Secretary of Dating, administering a national dating service for single people.
OK, so Jeffrey Frankel was wrong:
“the thesis of Jeffrey Frankel that the parties have switched places, with Democrats becoming the party of fiscal responsibility, free trade, competitive markets, and minimal government, while the Republicans have become the party of trade restriction, big government, and interventionist economics.” http://www.lewrockwell.com/tucker/tucker30.html
and http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~.jfrankel.academic.ksg/Republicans%20and%20Democrats%20Have%20Switched.PDF
Obviously, Frankel should have included Federal support for Marriage Counselling on the Republican agenda as well. Anyone can make a simple error of omission like that. The issue now is whether Federal programmes for more Marriage Counselling goes far enough to deal with the present crisis:
“Market forces are also threatening psychoanalysis. Of the roughly 15 million people in therapy in the US, few have the time or money for a treatment that typically lasts years and calls for as many as five one-hour, $100 sessions a week. Many patients - and all health insurers - favor short-term psychotherapies that target specific problems rather than delving deeply into a patient’s past. Two popular approaches are cognitive-behavioral therapy, which seeks to alter unwanted habits of thought and behavior, and interpersonal therapy, which focuses on patients’ current relationships with others.” - from: http://www.nichols.edu/faculty/davis/py151/Freud.htm
That’s really hilariously funny. Married people tend to be Republicans, so encourage more people to marry, and there will be more Republicans. Hmm.
But it’s not about marriage counselling, it’s about marriage promotion. A different thing. And no doubt more cost-effective. $1.5 billion would indeed not buy much individual counselling, but PR blather is aimed at a mass audience rather than one couple at a time. This thing seems to be about PR blather along with resisting the dreaded gay marriage and defending the ‘sanctity’ of the other kind.
For some reason, it’s these little things that really drive me batty about Bush & co. The Iraq war, for example, is a much worse idea, but I knew it was coming, I knew why, etc. This just makes me want to scream.
Of course, we now have exhibit #4,658 why actual principled libertarians really ought to be supporting Democrats these days rather than Republicans, at least at the national level.
Don’t conservatives believe that marriage is a cornerstone of society, and that (big)government is almost like a parasite on society’s back.
How on earth can they then believe that government would save marriage?
I think the issue here is that marriage promotion (if done intelligently) could end up saving the federal government a lot of money in social spending. Not just welfare, but also stuff like adoption and secondary effects like crime and so on. I could definitely see it saving money overall.
Given how abstinence promotion doesn’t work so well in sex education, I wouldn’t be too keen about what the Bush administration will come up with to promote marriage.
On the other hand, they could hire Matt Groening to promote marriage, which would at least be funny:
The Nine Types of Relationships
From Matt Groening’s very funny “Love Is Hell” - 1985 Pantheon Books.
Woman + Wimpy
She: “How many times have I told you not to cringe?”
He: “312?”
Advantages: Symbiotic; plus maybe she’ll get laryngitis and shut up.
Drawbacks: Permanent laryngitis unlikely.
Brute + Jumpy
He: “Me and her get along just fine.”
She: “I think I’ll have a little drink now.”
Advantages: Won’t last.
Drawbacks: Next relationship will be just the same.
Look-Gooders
He: “Ciao, darlin.”
She: (kiss noise)
Advantages: These young professionals look great together.
Drawbacks: They couldn’t care less about each other.
Sourballs vs. The World
He: “Can you believe this garbage on TV?”
She: “Goddamned re-runs.”
Advantages: Smug cheerlessness.
Drawbacks: Cheerless smugness.
I’m With Stupid X 2
He: “Where’s the beef?”
She: “Tee Hee Hee”
Advantages: They know oodles of jokes.
Drawbacks: They will tell them.
Mr. And Mrs. Boredom
He: “Honeybuns, do you ever wonder if maybe there’s more to life than
the two of us just sitting here night after night?”
She: “Nope.”
Advantages: Warm, comfy, snoozy.
Drawbacks: Insipid nicknames.
Jolly Jugular Jabbers
He: “I love that little idiot, ha ha. Heh heh.”
She: “He’s not as stupid as he looks, ho ho. Hee hee.”
Advantages: Smiles galore.
Drawbacks: Cruel nicknames.
Cobra + Mongoose
He: “Grrrr”
She: “Grrrr”
Advantages: The thrill of victory.
Drawbacks: The agony of a toaster hurled at your face.
Love Bunnies
He: “I wuv you”
She: “I wuv you too”
Advantages: Bliss, intimacy, joy, satisfaction, fulfillment.
Drawbacks: Sickening, isn’t it?
“I’m With Stupid X 2
He: “Where’s the beef?”
She: “Tee Hee Hee”
Advantages: They know oodles of jokes.
Drawbacks: They will tell them.”
Ooh, I know them! All too well! (They both like to forward ‘jokes’ to me in email. Oy.)
I like being the Mrs. in Mr. and Mrs. Boredom…
Third thought: how is the promotion of marriage a function of the federal government?
It isn’t but then neither is spending federal tax dollars on “violence prevention programs,” after-school programs, AIDS awareness campaigns, Americorps, population control, smoking cessation programs, the President’s Council on Physical Fitness, the Office of the Surgeon General, or numerous other “promotional” and “awareness” programs which are often sold to us as either being “preventative” of some social ill.
I assume of course that the same people snickering at a proposal to promote marriage in order to reduce welfare dependency would also favor the wholesale elimination of taxpayer support for these other programs as well.
I think the issue here is that marriage promotion (if done intelligently) could end up saving the federal government a lot of money in social spending. Not just welfare, but also stuff like adoption and secondary effects like crime and so on. I could definitely see it saving money overall.That is my understanding of the legislation as well. If you educate younger people about marriage so that they make more intelligent decisions about when to get married, how to make a marriage work, and other such resources then they are less likely to become impoverished, have children out of wedlock, and perpetuate the cycle of poverty.
“I like being the Mrs. in Mr. and Mrs. Boredom…”
Well of course you do. Mr and Mrs B always do.
I think that the beneficial effects of marriage will disappear or at least be reduced if marriage becomes a government program. Generally married people are happier and healthier, mostly because happy-healthy people are more likely to get married. If more people with problems start getting married, marriage won’t help them.
I really suspect that a lot of that 1.5 bil will go to faithbased programs (=Republican voters).
Ach come on people, it’s only $1.5bn. And most of it will go to the advertising industry and therefore be spent on cocaine.
A $1.5 billion covert operation to sabotage the nation’s condom supply would do wonders for the marriage rate.
Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review