For those trying to work out whether the Bush Administration’s stated commitment to democracy in the Middle East reflects Wilsonian idealism or just a tactical choice, reflecting the fact that the Administration’s enemies in the region are mostly not democrats, Venezuela provides a useful data point.
Should this post be longer than one paragraph?
No, that’s all. The continuation link was a bug, fixed now I hope.
The “democracy” truncheon having been rendered unusable, they have switched to the “sexually exploited kids” stick.
Surely no one supports kids being exploited??
What, among other things, is so thoroughly stupid about this is that the Bush administration tried this with Cuba as well and was proved wrong, especially after it was disclosed they had cribbed much of his claims from a student paper. Apparently he thinks that the world’s hens can supply an endless stream of eggs for him to wash off his face.
.I don’t think that 1 follows from the 2 - but its the insinuation that counts.
Chavez is firmly anti American and so there is no reason why they should lend him money - even if he was democratically elected (insert obligatory but tenuous Hitler/Nazi analogy). Second, there is another very good reason not to lend Venezuela money - it’s unlikely that it will repay it if it continues to pursue current trends policies.
What would be more relevant would be some sort of reference to Monroe doctrine and how South America is treated “differently” by the US – but these days it’s obligatory but tenuous Iraq reference that’s on auto insert.
If the enemies in the Middle East are not democracies, where are the democracies in the Middle East to make friends with?
Giles, Chávez is American. What he is not is a USA citizen. And why should any non-USA (foreign to you, since you seem to be an USA citizen) governing politicians put ahead USA interests to their own countries? (Unless they’re traitors, that is.)
Mind that I never liked Chávez, since I distrust too much militaries to like any of them.
DSW
I am still waiting for someone to demonstrate that Chavez is worse than (or even as bad as) other leaders we have supported in Latin America. I am not expert enough to say just how imperfect his democratic record is, but surely it is no worse than numerous other Latin American leaders and probably previous Venezuelan presidents as well. And at least Chavez redistributes oil money toward the poor, which is a good thing IMO.
Americans have no standing to pose as wise, impartial realists when it comes to Latin American politics.
No one objects to Chavez putting Venuzuela’s own interests first - and by the same token theres no reason why the US shouldnt put its interests first and block these loans.
And ultimately I thinks that this is probably in Chaviez’ interest as
Lets put this simply. Chavez is disliked because he moved Venezuala from being a cheater on to a strong proponent of OPEC.
No one objects to Chavez putting Venuzuela’s own interests first - and by the same token theres no reason why the US shouldnt put its interests first and block these loans.
Some might argue that the developed world has a responsibility to set a good example to everyone else.
Of course, said ‘some’ are Evil Librul Traitors and should probably be strung up right away.
and some argue that by making loans to third world countries, the developed world enslaves them.
Which is why I’m surpirsed Chaviez sought them and why I think, overall this refusal is a good thing.
Chavez stands for, inter alia, for develping world independence. Not relying on foreign handouts should be a plank of that philopshy. On the other hand he has to act in Venuzuala’s interests by requesting the loans. the refusal then keeps him honest.
I think the real problem is the reason given since a) loans should not be tied to domestic social policies b) its clearly bull that dicredits the system.
Giles, the US is not refusing to lend its own money, it’s opposing a routine request to borrow money from international agencies.
But if you’re going to defend the Administration on Venezuela, let’s hear your how supporting coups against democratically elected governments fits with the Admin’s rhetoric on the Middle East.
The recent episode is merely a reminder that this wasn’t an isolated aberration.
The money comes through an international agencies which are part backed by the US. Thats why it gets a vote and why, as the article explains it’s just a vote and not a right to block. And this is a right conferred on most contirbutors so I dont see why the US should be singled out for exercising that right.
And supporting coups, unsuccesfully, is just a sign of stupidity. On very much the same level as the “world leaders” who are openly endorsing Kerry!
Giles, endorsing a candidate who is running in an election is more compatible with democracy than supporting a coup against an elected leader, nicht wahr?
yes, but the test I am running here is the simple good sense test - more specifically that weak support that had no effect one way or the other (and nor was likely to) a) has bolstered Chavez’s credibilty internationally and at home b) hasn’t done much to bolster US credibilty in Latin America. i.e. it has failed on both accounts.
The best polical analogy is John Major who wierdly endorsed Dole(?) against Clinton.
Why was that stupid? - a) because it was never likely to have any effect on the US eloctorate and b) because it went against the reality on the ground.
So from the Bay of Pigs to Schroder, it seems that leaders never learn. Just one of those things.
Ironic to mention “Wilsonian idealism” in this context, given Wilson’s record of military intervention in Latin America . . .
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review