By now you’ve probably read this story about what Dick Cheney said yesterday:
Indicators measure the nation’s unemployment rate, consumer spending and other economic milestones, but Vice President Dick Cheney says it misses the hundreds of thousands who make money selling on eBay. “That’s a source that didn’t even exist 10 years ago,” Cheney told an audience in Ohio. “Four hundred thousand people make some money trading on eBay.”
John Edwards said this morning that “If we only included bake sales and how much money kids make at lemonade stands, this economy would really be cooking.” I see three possible responses from Cheney.
Brad DeLong points out: “Cheney needs a staff who will tell him that the $2.0 billion or so in eBay’s domestic revenues are already included in the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis’s estimates of GDP.”
You obviously don’t understand the supreme power of the New Economy (the Resurrection).
I know two people whose full time job is trading on ebay. You obviously can’t count every person who trades on ebay as a worker on ebay. But those who buy and sell on ebay as a job aren’t any less workers than those who buy and sell out of a store.
That’s true, Sebastian. But:
a) some eBay merchants are already being “counted” because they’re connected to brick-and-mortar businesses or are otherwise tracked within current economic statistics.
b) if Cheney’s serious about trying to take account of the informal economy—something I’m not wholly opposed to in my own field, given the importance of the informal economy in African economic life—his staff needs to tell him something else, namely, that the parts of the informal economy that really substantively matter are prostitution, drug trafficking, circulation of stolen goods, and similar illegal or quasi-legal activities. Even if you “counted” full-time eBay traders in any “count” you care to name, they’d amount to virtually zero significance at the national scale.
But those who buy and sell on ebay as a job aren’t any less workers than those who buy and sell out of a store.
Which is why they would be counted as ‘self-employed’ when they filed their taxes.
Well, charitably (and what better way is there to be), Cheney might have been advancing, by concrete example, the argument made elsewhere that the divergence between the household and payroll surveys does in fact indicate growing self-employment and entrepreneurship, so that the payroll survey understates aggregate employment. This is a respectable argument. Still, he’ll have to do a better job at it, with Edwards on his case.
Or maybe you could spend a few seconds on Google News and come up with a better source for what he actually said and in what context:
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/09/10/loc_cheney10jobs.html
ebay is little more than an example of the “greater fool theory. Typical of auctions. It produces no wealth.
Five words: “Real estate. No money down.”
The point really is not how many people he thinks make a living on ebay and then claim to be unemployed, or whatever. The point is, garage sales, even huge online garage sales, which re-sell things, are not something you count as part of a growing economy. Even if your beanie babie goes up in value.
“Say you’ve changed your mind and that women’s domestic labor should be counted as part of the formal economy. “
That’s an introductory economics level mis-statement.
Domestic labor is not counted in the formal economy as monetary transactions do not take place; by contrast they do on ebay - hence Cheney’s contention that they could be included.
Chance - Perhaps govt economists don’t account for huge online garage sales as part of a growing economy, but in that case they’re wrong. There’s that problem again of what to do about quality increases. I don’t use e-bay, but I do use other internet sources, such as Amazon and Abebooks, that have increased my utility.
As for Cheney, I do believe he cited e-bay just as an example and not as the only source.
Didn’t they try to count the fast-food industry as manufacturing a few months ago?
“The point is, garage sales, even huge online garage sales, which re-sell things, are not something you count as part of a growing economy. Even if your beanie babie goes up in value.”
I don’t think you are right about this. Does a collector’s shop count as part of the economy? Does an antiques shop count as part of the economy?
And that’s not even counting all the preteen girls’ babysitting money!
I’m surprised no-one here has pointed to the obvious example. Blogging is (I roughly estimate) a billion-dollar a year industry and (apart from a handful of companies with modest revenues) appears nowhere in the National Accounts.
“Blogging is (I roughly estimate) a billion-dollar a year industry and (apart from a handful of companies with modest revenues) appears nowhere in the National Accounts.”
Surely to be included in the accounts (positively) it must create “value added”?
Which is prabably why Cheny wont be pushing for its inclusion any time soon!
You get paid for blogging? You make money blogging? Good for you!
Hmm…. what about men’s domestic labor?
Judging by the times at which I see posts and comments going up, lots of people get paid for blogging!
Kevin, DeLong is only accounting for ebay’s own income from online auctions. Not the receipts from the auctions themselves. It sidesteps Cheney’s [independently questionable] point altogether.
Alex, in my innocence (never having had anything at all to do with ebay) I had assumed that the goods auctioned are second-hand, hence already part of some previous year’s GDP?
Unless I am much mistaken, John Quiggin is taking the piss out of the non-economists.
Well to be fair, kevin many ebay vendors sell new items as well. But as timothy points out above many from this group (and categories like cars and boats) use ebay as a supplement to b&m sales operations, hence the most sizeable receipts I would guess should already be part of the commerce dept. figures.
In 2003, $24B of merchandise was sold on eBay. Quite a bake sale I must say.
I must come from a parallel world, but I always thought people selling off their household goods in order to survive was a bad sign.
Perhaps Cheney’s just been taking the subject lines on his spam too seriously.
daniel that is missing the point.
The Cheney argument is meant to show us that all this “Increased Productivity” which has somehow made for greater corporate profits but not translated down into raises or increased takehome pay is still really good for us, because the stats showing no increase in takehome pay are missing all the people who are augmenting it with a share of the GDP which isn’t coming from conventional wages or salary.
And technically what he said is true - millions of people are making “some” money from Ebay. “Millions of people” in this country, taken collectively, are also making all of the GDP.
But that doesn’t help Joe Smoe in Podunk, Michigan, who’s sold his baseball card collection to buy his kids asthma medicine because he has no benefits from his day job, while Betsy Devos is taking home a much larger slice of the GDP and telling him that he gets paid too much.
It’s casuistry, the truth that is less honest than lies.
—kieran, that “let them sell tchochkes” line is perfect. I was struggling to come up with a way of making the “let them eat cake” equation all morning.
John Q. - there is a fascinating point inside that joke. I think a heap of the intellectual energy in the blogosphere comes from people like you who are discussing issues that are very close to your professional interests.
A lot of the time to blog and comment comes from people who are not taking a cut lunch to work in the cubicle farm all day. Self employed, students, retired, under employed, shift workers, pensioners of various kinds, managers of businesses around the information industry.. etc.
I know a large number of people who make more than 50% of their yearly income on ebay…
And dont pay a dime in fed or state income or sales taxes on any of it to boot.
Tell that to Cheney.
username, I think it’s already established that Cheney needs to mention all the illegal activity-related income, if he wants to be really accurate. (which of course he doesn’t at all)
—Though this does beg the question, how many traditional bricks-and-mortar fences and pawnbrokers have gone out of business as a result of ebay?
Cheney claims that “hundreds of thousands” make money trading on e-Bay. Any evidence? Hundreds of thousands buy and sell stuff - that doesn’t mean any significant number are actually getting any income out of it. I don’t see how anyone can make anything actually trading (buying and then selling) on e-Bay, a very efficient market. If I buy stuff in a garage sale and resell on e-Bay, then I am a trader. But before I could have sold on a street stall. There probably is an increase in income from the new platform not counted in GDP, but not that much.
The main point to make against Cheney is that suddenly adding in all or part of the informal economy doesn’t change the facts about the formal economy you measured before. All the benchmarks change. How does he know the informal economy wasn’t doing well under Clinton and worse under Bush, like the rest?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review