In the children’s classic Charlotte’s Web, a spider saves the life of Wilbur, a pig bound for slaughter, by spinning webs in English that say that Wilbur was an amazing, special creature. The humans believe anything that they read, and ignore the evidence of their senses that says that Wilbur is just another pig.
As a kid, I enjoyed this book very much, but I didn’t believe that people would be that dumb. As it turns out, I should have trusted E.B. White.
In case you missed it, Slate’s Chris Suellentrop wrote a short piece about Wesley Clark on the campaign trail. He picked a handful of campaign rhetoric from Clark, and labelled each quote as if it was an outrageous accusation. Right-wingers (including Andrew Sullivan, Instapundit, and lots of others) took this piece as evidence that Clark was a big ol’ loon, and left-wingers (Mark Kleiman, Josh Marshall, Kevin Drum) argued that Clark was being sharply misrepresented.
It turns out that Sullentrop intended to satirically make the point that Clark wasn’t being covered like Dean. Unlike Dean, his statements were less likely to be distorted and blown out of proportion. No one (including myself) realized that it was intended as satire.
Sullentrop has learned accidentally what I’ve suspected for a while: if a writer wants to spin a candidate, it almost doesn’t matter what that candidate actually says. What really matters is framing. If the story says, “Clark made a crazy accusation when he said ‘X’”, the contents of ‘X’ don’t matter much. The target audience, the ones who desperately want to believe, just aren’t going to read it very critically. (This goes both ways, of course. Volokh conspirators have frequently noted that there’s often little or nothing wrong with the “Bushisms” published in Slate, other than the fact that they are framed as humorous errors.)
It also seems as if some people truly seem to read criticism of Bush as outrageous by definition. Read Sullivan; his shock that Bush is being questioned is palpable.
Sigh. I’m going to Fametracker to talk about hobbits or something.
“if a writer wants to spin a candidate, it almost doesn’t matter what that candidate actually says. What really matters is framing.”
Agreed, 100%. For an excellent send up of this, go to this site:
http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_shows/thedailyshowwithjonstewart/
And watch the clip with Stephen Colbert entitled “Mean Dean” (first video under “Correspondent Pieces”, in the column on the right side of the page.)
Hmmm. I’ve variously introduced Clark as a Mad Dog and a spastic dunce. I suppose I should let my readers decide.
The funny thing about Clark is, you can surf here and there and find people saying omigawd, did you hear what Clark said? and it’s something different every time. The guy can’t even pick a gaffe and stick with it.
Thanks for reminding me that Fametracker is back from vacation! (Just up: Ian McKellen’s fame audit.)
It’s kind of like Roosevelt’s gaffe when he said ‘The only thing we have to fear is fear itself’ and neglected to mention the Japanese and Germans who wanted to kill us all.
I didn’t realize the Sullentrop piece was satire, but I also wasn’t persuaded by it. I recall thinking that a candidate is faced with an almost impossible task in preventing everything they say from being spun against them. I took Sullentrop’s piece seriously in the sense that I came away thinking that, though sisyphean, perhaps Clark should try harder.
Reynolds et al should be embarassed that they’ve been trolled in the old-fashioned sense.
Since when and by whose definition are Kleiman, Marshall and Drum left wingers?
‘No one (including myself) realized that it was intended as satire.’
If it doesn’t fly, call it satire. If your game is rumbled, cry satire.
David ‘I didn’t mean it that way’ Brooks can tell you all about it after his anti-neocon=anti-semite kite took a dive. So can Maureen Dowd, reprising the Al Gore ‘earth tones’ approach with Wesley Clark’s sweater. Apparently she was SATIRISING columnists who do that stuff. Honest! I seem to recall Thomas Friedman backtracking on one of his more offensive sallies last year, hiding behind ‘irony’ or something.
They figure if they throw enough mud, much of it will stick no matter what minor comeuppance they have to endure afterwards. And they’re right.
I always thought it made sense for the humans to consider Wilber special - How amny pigs have spiders writing great things aobut them in English? Must be SOMETHING special about the pig to get that done for him.
Of course, I did always wonder why none of the humans was similarly impressed by the SPIDER.
It turns out that Sullentrop intended to satirically make the point that Clark wasn’t being covered like Dean.
Ummm… I just glanced at Slate’s site, and I don’t see Suellentrop waving the ‘joke’ (err… ‘satire’) flag anywhere. Did I miss it, or did this realization spring fully-formed from your head?
Mike D: Suellentrop claimed it was satire on Slate’s comment boards.
Rrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiigggggggghhhhht.
Considering it’s Slate, I’d stick with ‘he screwed up and got caught’.
Slate is an example of the problems with today’s journalism. They had a nice subsidy from Microsoft, and could play with new niches.
But it’s clear from Hitchen (and secondarily from) Saleton and Sullentrop that they really fear being rejected by the Kewl Kids of mainstream journalism.
Mike D,
Here’s the link. I guess it’s possible that he’s being dishonest, but I didn’t make it up.
andrew sullivan writes:
“MOORE ENDORSES CLARK: That’s according to Drudge. It’s all you need to know really, isn’t it?”
is this really a problem of perception? dennis miller and bill maher are at least funny in addition to being hacks. what’s andrew sullivan’s excuse?
Or maybe Suellentrop’s piece is just badly written satire. If the audience didn’t receive what the author of a non-fiction piece intended to convey, I’d say the fault is the author’s.
I’m looking for the satire, but I still don’t see it. I’d put it down to not being an American, but other people’s responses seem to indicate otherwise.
What if Newsweek or the Times printed erroneous and misleading stories and then hid behind a defence of “just kidding”? When you hear it on The Daily Show you know it’s satire, when it’s in Slate, they ought to give you a warning.
Rick, that’s the best and most succinct comment of them all.
dennis miller and bill maher are at least funny in addition to being hacks.
Miller is funny? On what planet? He used to be funny, back when he had decent writers.
It also seems as if some people truly seem to read criticism of Bush as outrageous by definition. Read Sullivan; his shock that Bush is being questioned is palpable.
Try reading Sullivan’s last few posts (as of Thursday evening) and see if you still think that he is ‘shock[ed]’ by any questioning of Bush.
One is titled It’s Even Worse Than Your Think and concludes, “I’m afraid that the answer is that this administration simply doesn’t care what it’s spending or will spend. Deficits don’t matter, remember? These people are beginning to make Lyndon Johnson look like Herbert Hoover.”
The next is titled And When In Doubt, Lie. That is followed by an endorsement of Moveon.org’s latest ad.
A little later, in a post titled Bush in Iraq, he says that they screwed up the WMD arguement and much of the post war planning, and are too arogant to admit to having made a mistake.
I assume I don’t have to mention his disagreement with the Bushies over gay mariage.
Whatever else Sullivan may be, I think it’s past time that he can creditably be accused of being an uncritical Bush sycophant.
Oops I did it again! - Brittney Spears TGP thumbnail gallery we live together welivetogether little trouble maker joey jenna big naturals in the vip latina hardcore movies solo video girl
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review