I’m suprised that none of the blogs that deal with British left sectariana have linked to George Monbiot’s column yesterday . I know George says daft things from time to time (and there’s a factual error about the Royal Society in this very column) but pointing out the genealogy of Spiked!, the Institute of Ideas, LM Magazine etc etc and the links between the various swivel-eyed neolibertarian technoenthusiasts who are the former Revolutionary Communist Party seems like a public service that should be performed every so often. (Especially now they all have “proper jobs” writing columns for the Times and fronting think tanks.)
I did, but then I’m new around these parts:
see:http://bloodandtreasure.blogspot.com/2003_12_01_bloodandtreasure_archive.html#107106413614055325
Dang, that is really interesting. And a bit alarming. Frank Furedi, eh? I linked to several reviews of his book on therapy, it sounded interesting. Hmm. And we’ve linked to spiked and Inst. of Ideas stuff several times, and re-published (by invitation) an article of theirs. Hmm. Interesting. Again one runs into the problem of judging things by their content rather than their provenance - but all the same one at least wants to know what agenda one may be helping. Hmm.
Monbiot’s first paragraph was odd though - made it sound as if the Bush admin is run by former leftists. I dooooon’t think so.
Philip Stott has blogged about it at Envirospin. He makes some excellent points, I think.
Nick Barlow got there yesterday and with a link to Scottish Socialist Party blogger Alister Black and I would have commented too, but GreyMatter died on me and I’m too busy writing my own CMS (as I promised to do a year ago).
I’ve got a lot to say on this, once I get it all straight in my head. I’m less surprised, even sympathetic, that some of the old left has moved to the new ‘right’: a lot of the appeal in the 70s and 80s was the anti-authoritarian “smash the state” ethos, and that looks right-wing now… I even feel that I ought to have moved with them, but there are other aspects of the left, the “compassionate” side, which have greater sway over me. Not that any of New Labour appeals at all… In many ways Glenn Reynolds is right, “left” and “right” are outdated. (And I really hate Instapundit.)
This certainly explains Brendan O’Neill’s incessant inanity…to a certain extent.
This is a really really interesting subject. As far as I could understand, those ex-revolutionary marxists are now playing the corporate media whores… in order to make the situation so bad that the “real revolution” happens (!), and not just lame gradual reformism.
Well that’s probably the rationalisation of a newfound “take the money and run” attitude…
A few remarks:
Hang on, Spiked are ‘swivel eyed’ while the left wing answer to Roger Scruton, George Monbiot, is apparently a vision of sanity? On what planet?
I’d be interested in the justification for your comment, Richard. Where is GM held up as a “vision of sanity”?
Hm. There was an RCP here in the US. It was a militantly Maoist/Stalinist group which specialized in taking credit for demonstrations actually organized by opposed groups — they’d be very visible at the front and try to get on TV.
Earlier they HAD been involved in violence, against the LaRouche group (American Labor Party?) which had been a leftist faction in 1968 but moved steadily right. About ?1980? these two groups were fighting in the streets occasionally in a sort of pitiful way.
Now the LaRouche group took almost exactly the path the British RCP took — anti-environmentalism (and nuclear power) are their big political issue. Their RCP enemies, as far as I know, disappeared. (I can’t imagine them sliding in the libertarian direction, mostly because of their anti-intellectualism and stupidity though I never knew any of them well enough to be sure of that.)
Perhaps it’s just a chance coincidence of party names, and the two RCP’s were unrelated. Both the LaRouche and RCP groups were often thought of as police front groups, without much evidence except their bizarre and proocative behavior.
“I’d be interested in the justification for your comment, Richard. Where is GM held up as a “vision of sanity”?”
I suppose I should confess to more than a little intemperate hyperbole in my first post. I think what I should have said was that I was taken aback by the implication that, while George says daft things from time to time, this wasn’t one of those occasions? In particular, am I supposed to take seriously Monbiot’s assertion that the likes of Fox and Furedi are ‘in favour of global warming?’ They might well oppose Kyoto on certain grounds but such points can be debated; whereas the tone of Monbiot’s piece seems rather censorious to me (and frankly unpleasantly redolent of conspiracy theory without much in the way of conclusive evidence). If Monbiot disputes the views held by Spiked, perhaps he could confine himself to disputing them and avoid ad hominem. I’m sorry, but Monbiot just seems to me to have chosen an absolutely nauseating way to conduct a debate.
The Monbiot’s trend appears to hold true for US liberals at least in the GM debate. A former US Congressman from Dayton, OH., was appointed Ambassador to The U.S. Mission to the United Nations Agencies in Rome. Mr. Hall spent his time in Congress on World Hunger and now he appears to have found the solution in GM food, but first he has to convince Africa and the Pope that this is A-OKAY. In order to get that done is advocating the Monsanto position on formulating ownership of GM food.
A former liberal turned corporate front man.
I could easily be speaking out of turn here, but presuming that people reading this have any actual interest in spiked’s politics…
First off, most libertarians I’ve run into make for dull company. They have a one track mind: tax, tax, tax, tax …. So far as I know spiked has never mentioned the issue. (In fact they’ve made the best defence of pensions I’ve seen, attacking the “demographic timebomb” argument as a variety of malthusianism.)
Libertarians are also not known for advocating politics and democracy. But laments about the collapse of politics are one of the most repetitive themes of spiked editorials.
Second, their IT coverage has focused around criticising technological determinism. They ran a whole conference in London on the New Economy focused around the idea or criticising both technophiles and technophobes.
On biotechnology they had a go at both Greg Stock (technophile author of Redesigning Humans: Our Inevitable Genetic Future) and Fukuyama (technophobe author of Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution) for technological determinism.
I can see where “neolibertarian technoenthusiasts” came from, but I have to say I don’t think spiked fits the image that the prejudices associated with the phrase are likely to conjure up.
Generally the tone of Monbiot’s article doesn’t aid understanding much. He makes a comparison to “neo-cons” and the Pentagon - but spiked has opposed war in Iraq. spiked has also defended abortion rights in uncompromising terms. On abortion and embryo research Monbiot makes it look like him who’s in the Bush camp.
Overall I think Monbiot is too obsessed with the environment to even think about what might be going on. Where is the corporate interest paying Furedi to write about Therapy Culture or the Institute of Ideas to make museums a big deal?
Lee: “By hook or by crook, LM/RCP/IOI/SOS/Spiked always end up pushing positions that echo the views of right-wing elements within the British state (not parlliament or parties, but the apparatus itself)”
Not exactly sure what you mean by “right-wing” here, but how do you square this with their line on immigration controls (abolish them)?
Apologies if I misunderstood the terms of the debate.
Actually the point about spiked’s advocacy of abolishing immigration controls was one I made discussing this at Butterflies and Wheels. It is an argument I’ve heard from US libertarians, but it isn’t something I generally expect from the UK right wing. More specifically, what about Mick Hume’s current piece on how consumer choice is a contradiction in terms? Is that right-wing? Or Phil Mullan’s piece blaming the pensions crisis on the business class?
Monbiot’s piece is nonsense throughout. The first ‘RCP’ section is pure fiction. The events described did not happen. How exactly did the organisation try to destroy the Polytechnic of North London, for instance? Blocking the sinks and leaving the water running over the weekend? If you look at Monbiot’s website, the sources for many of his claims are either gossipy British leftists or LM articles. The latter he then distorts, but readers of his newspaper column might not have the time to follow up these assertions.
(Incidentally, the GMWatch source of this piece attacks the RCP/LM from the right - as ‘soft on terror’ etc.) Many of the people/networks Monbiot rants about in the second part of the article reached their current libertarian outlook regardless of whether ‘corporate sponsorship’ for it exists or not. Monbiot and Nick Cohen over at Guardian sister paper the Observer run the same sort of article annually - change the record!
Check out www.spiked-online.com for a sense of the actual, not the fabricated political analysis under discussion here.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review