Just a quick plug. I’m just back from watching Errol Morris’s The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara . For those who don’t know about it, the film is a long (and cold) confessional interview with McNamara interspersed with documentary footage from WW2, from his time with Ford and from the period when he was Secretary of Defense (including the Cuban missile crisis and the Vietnam war). The film is structured around a series of “lessons” which focus on the fallibility of leaders. There are some chilling moments, such as when McNamara contemplates the incinteration of hundreds of thousands of human beings in the firebombing of Tokyo and leaves open the question of whether he and Curtis LeMay committed war crimes. There’s a good page on an event at Berkeley with McNamara and Morris here . Get to see it if you can.
I saw it last night. It’s amazing how smart and articulate that guy is at his age. Comes off as truly a tragic figure. McNamara’s life is a lesson in how smart, scientific approaches to problems don’t necessarily yield the best results. Something technocrats and technologists need to remember, even more so today.
I saw this documentary several weeks ago, and thought it was a simply brilliant piece of filmmaking, containing some very scary history. A lot of the lessons that McNamara offers up are very relavant today. Not that W. would ever acknowledge that…he has to stay with his convictions. No room for that learning stuff.
Kirk at American Amnesia has an excellent interview with Morris about McNamara and the film. Highly recommended.
Of the reviews I read, Fred Kaplan’s in Slate was the most spot-on. Search for it there, I’m too lazy to link.
I watched and reviewed this film a few months ago (search my blog if you’re curious). At the time, I said that it was the film that Errol Morris was put on this planet to make, and I’m still convinced of that.
If I remember correctly, McNamara has been more explicitly critical of Bush’s policy in Iraq, a position he refused to take while filming and promoting “Fog.”
I thought it was a good flick too. For something interesting check out Alterman’s hate of this flick.
Alterman kind of has a point, though I liked the film a lot. Basically, if you know something about the history, it’s an interesting character study, because of what is left unsaid as much as anything else. If one doesn’t really know the history, however, it’s a lousy starting point; Morris really lets McNamara make some pretty dubious statements without challenging him, which is Alterman’s beef. McNamara does this sort of fake candid routine, which is kind of fasinating if you know he’s doing it.
“McNamara’s life is a lesson in how smart, scientific approaches to problems don’t necessarily yield the best results.”
What does yield the best results? Has a new method of living been invented that reliably produces the best results? I didn’t hear about it, but I didn’t read the news today.
All criticism of technocratic solutions comes down to an assertion of “Everything would be better if people did stuff my way.” In my circle of friends the stated or unstated critique of technocratic solutions usually has one of these 4 beliefs:
1.) Leaders should be more spiritual.
2.) Leaders should not lead. We should all lead ourselves.
3.) Leaders should stop listening to them and start listening to us. (the identity of us and them varies depending on who I’m talking to).
4.) Technocratic solutions are, by definition, materialistic (which is a bad thing).
Of these, 1, 2 and 4 are basically matters of taste, and 3 is a universal bias that nearly all of us have, at least sometimes (that they are being listened to too much, and we are being unfairly ignored).
Personally, I think technocratic politicians are passionaless, dull, and sometimes right but usually for the wrong reasons. However, I recognize that this feeling of mine is a mere matter of taste. I also believe that well intentioned people often do catastrophic harm, that people acting in good faith can betray an ideal as completely as someone acting in bad faith (this is my dad’s take on Lyndon Johnson), and that the amount of information available to us is for all practical purposes infinite, so the best-informed among us knows the same percent of total information as the least informed among us.
“McNamara’s life is a lesson in how smart, scientific approaches to problems don’t necessarily yield the best results.”
What does yield the best results? Has a new method of living been invented that reliably produces the best results? I didn’t hear about it, but I didn’t read the news today.
All criticism of technocratic solutions comes down to an assertion of “Everything would be better if people did stuff my way.” In my circle of friends the stated or unstated critique of technocratic solutions usually has one of these 4 beliefs:
1.) Leaders should be more spiritual.
2.) Leaders should not lead. We should all lead ourselves.
3.) Leaders should stop listening to them and start listening to us. (the identity of us and them varies depending on who I’m talking to).
4.) Technocratic solutions are, by definition, materialistic (which is a bad thing).
Of these, 1, 2 and 4 are basically matters of taste, and 3 is a universal bias that nearly all of us have, at least sometimes (that they are being listened to too much, and we are being unfairly ignored).
Personally, I think technocratic politicians are passionaless, dull, and sometimes right but usually for the wrong reasons. However, I recognize that this feeling of mine is a mere matter of taste. I also believe that well intentioned people often do catastrophic harm, that people acting in good faith can betray an ideal as completely as someone acting in bad faith (this is my dad’s take on Lyndon Johnson), and that the amount of information available to us is for all practical purposes infinite, so the best-informed among us knows the same percent of total information as the least informed among us.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review