According to Scott Martens at A Fistful of Euros , Tariq Ramadan (recently interviewed by OpenDemocracy) who had been appointed to a visiting position at Notre Dame, has been denied a US visa under sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act that were amended by the Patriot Act. Scott comments:
Whether one agrees with Ramadan or not, it is difficult to image an Islamic intellectual figure who is likely to be more acceptable as the other side in an American dialogue with Islam. Thus, the refusal to allow him to enter the US suggests that someone in Homeland Security agrees with the Daniel Pipes standard: Any Muslim who fails to condemn Islam, from its founding to the present and in all its manifestations, must be a fanatic and a threat to the West. …. This is an opportunity for Europeans and Americans to show that at the very least they are capable of exercising better judgement than the Bush administration.
Rephrasing Monty Python’s “Bruces”:
“I’ve told him he’s welcome to teach any of the great Islamic thinkers, provided he makes it clear that they were wrong. “
JihadWatch accuses Ramadan of refusing to condemn the stoning of wimmins during a debate with N Sarkozy (then French interior minister). (I seem to recall he opposed the head scarf ban, too, but then so did Chris von Timber and so did I, and I, for one, have yet to be refused entry to the FDRUSA on account of it.)
The debate itself is online, but it is somewhat in French. The gist of Ramadan’s real position is that, as a member of a broader Islamique community, it is not his place to unilaterally preempt its debates,
Nicolas SARKOZY:
Ca pose un problème, c’est que nous sommes en 2003 et en 2003 nous sommes un certain nombre qui ne pouvons pas accepter que les femmes musulmanes parce qu’elles seraient musulmanes soient frappées, c’est quand même un discours moyenâgeux, c’est un discours qu’on ne peut pas accepter. On peut être pédagogique sur tel ou tel point qui sont pour le coup de détail pas sur des châtiments corporels physiques sur les femmes quand même.Tariq RAMADAN:
Non vous avez parfaitement raison, monsieur SARKOZY vous avez parfaitement raison mais tenez-vous à ce que je dis, si il s?agit d?avoir un débat avec moi, ma position elle est extrêmement claire, la violence conjugale, et la violence à l’endroit d’une femme est inacceptable, islamiquement, c’est ce que je dis, et je le dis avec force.SARKOZKY:
RAMADAN:
The problem is that it’s 2003 and in 2003 some of us can’t accpet that Muslim women, because they are women, should beaten, that it’s a medieval way of talking, an unacceptable way of talking. On can take a pedagogical approach on some point of detail (?) or another, but not on corporal punishment of women.
You are quite right, M. Sarkozy, you are quite right, but keep in mind what I’m saying, that if it were a debate with me, my position is quite clear, conjugal violence, and violence with respect to women is unacceptable, islamically, that’s what I say, and I say so strongly.
And if anyone’s thinking of trotting out the Islamic Reformation malarkey again, I would preemptively agree with the recent Courrier International letter writer who pointed out that a more apt desideratum is something like the kind of synthesis of reason and faith that Thomas ab Aquino put together, and which he swiped, as a project, off of Alverroes in the first place.
Thanks Des, I was looking for a transcript of that debate.
(I posted the following reply to Scott Martens’s original post; perhaps someone here would like to comment.)
…the Daniel Pipes standard: Any Muslim who fails to condemn Islam, from its founding to the present and in all its manifestations, must be a fanatic and a threat to the West.
Obviously one cannot be a Muslim and condemn Islam in all its manifestations. Therefore every Muslim would be a fanatic and a threat to the West.
That’s a heavy assertion to put into anyone’s mouth; it’s in the same league as advocating genocide. On what basis do you ascribe this view to Mr. Pipes?
it is unamerican to not let good looks triumph over ideological differences.
Hee! It’s true; Ramadan is a fox.
Worldview on Chicago Public Radio did a show today all about Ramadan’s being denied a Visa. One woman who was interviewed inanely argued that Ramadan’s belief that Islam is a better religion than Judaism and Christianity made him an anti-Semite and a generally bad man to be in a university environment. She did clarify that she didn’t believe that should keep him from being granted a Visa, but still. It was idiotic. All those other religions advocate the equal truth-value of all beliefs.
There’s a petition for Ramadan’s admission, signatures being collected at
academic_freedom_usa@yahoo.co.uk
Hee! It’s true; Ramadan is a fox.
yes, i wondered what scott martens meant by “it is difficult to image an Islamic intellectual figure who is likely to be more acceptable as the other side in an American dialogue with Islam” — acceptable to Muslims? acceptable to Islamists? acceptable to Americans?
then i realized he meant acceptable to me (and you).
rosalind - “All those other religions advocate the equal truth-value of all beliefs.” What is meant by this statement?
James, I meant that sarcastically. The woman interviewed on the program was making the case that Ramadan is exceptional in that his religious beliefs cause him to, you know, not accept other religious beliefs. Which is pretty much the essence of almost all religious beliefs.
Mr. Ramadan avocates Lapadation. This type of belief should not be allowed to penertrate the minds of our young. Our department of imigration granted a visa to a radical Islamic Fundamentalist and anti Semite. We Americans are expected to be vigilent! A man of his ilk under the disguise of a Jesuit University being granted permission to work in our country? NO!
both Jews and Muslims have semitic roots, which can be seen in the extreme closeness of Arabic and Hebrew - All members of each group are considered Semites and thus an Arab-Muslim man cannot be anti-semitic.
luxuqsqotoa mipscjos.
That’s so funny!
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
Dialogue with intellectuals like Tariq Ramadan are essential to creating a more humane world. Suppresion and blind patriotism leads to ignorance and radicalism. Allowing the government to fully control the education system will always create problems and revoking Ramadan’s visa is taking a step in the wrong direction.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review