David Post complains that John Kerry was not at the game to see the Red Sox beat the Yankees:
AND WHERE WAS JOHN? … I’m surprised that there hasn’t been much talk about why we didn’t see Kerry at any of the games. He’s the junior senator from Massachusetts; he’s got a bona fide reason to snap his fingers, get the front row seats, put on his sox cap and jacket, and root like an ordinary human being. What, he doesn’t want the national TV exposure?? Was he worried about alienating Yankee fans? I guess one shouldn’t make too much of what is “just a ballgame,” but really: to his constituents, this is the most important thing going on at the moment; he’s lived and worked in Massachusetts all his life; is he the only person in that category who wouldn’t take free tickets to see these games? I honestly don’t get it, and it does make me wonder about the guy.
Note the pincer movement here. On the one hand, Kerry should have been at the game because that’s what “an ordinary human being” would do. On the other hand, Kerry is not a regular guy, because he’s a senator, is running for President, and he could have snapped his fingers to get front row seats. So, either he snaps his fingers or he doesn’t. He chose not to, for whatever reason, and so leaves himself open on the flank David attacks: “who wouldn’t take free tickets… does make me wonder about the guy” and so on. But say Kerry had snapped his fingers and gotten front row seats, his face on the Jumbotron and the inevitable TV News coverage. What then? It’s obvious. He’d have opened himself up to whinging on just the opposite grounds, viz, “Isn’t it typical of an elitist Senator who hasn’t been to a game all season to just snap his fingers, get front row seats, and try to use the Red Sox’s historic victory as a campaign rally? A classier guy — any ordinary human being, really — would have stayed away and let the fact that the Sox beat the curse have the limelight.” Heads I win, Tails you lose.
Also, if the Sox had lost, Kerry would by association be seen as a loser.
My understanding is that Kerry is a hockey nut, but more a player than a fan — carried a bag around during primary season with skates, smelly uniform of sorts, etc., always ready for a pick-up game.
Then, there are the shots of Kerry windsurfing: nobody ever says, whoa!, this is a sixty year old guy, athletic enough to windsurf! No one says, windsurfing is a young person’s hobby, no oh no, its a “rich man’s sport” evidenced supposedly by the pricetag of the equipment, (which most people rent anyway).
More importantly, how goddamned useless is David Post?
I don’t know who the hell he is, but this post provides me with all the empirical data I need to sufficiently answer that question to my satisfaction.
More Volokh, less Conspiracy, please. Fortunately David Post doesn’t, much. A few of the conspiracists seem to be under the impression that they’re posting on the Corner or some random Kerry-bashing site.
Sad witness to the fact that this election is really about critical thinking.
I too am unfamiliar with DP, but it appears that the VC is suffering a pre-election infusion of partisan hackery, notwithstanding their generally high level of discourse. eg, their newest addition, jim lindgren, apparently an otherwise super-brain, finds the “joke” below funny. and when I expressed concern about the deleterious impact of such drivvel in an e-mail to EV, I got a prissy reply to the effect that he “likes” JL and didn’t consider me “serious” because I labeled various JL postings “partisan crap”. not the most sophisticated description I’ll admit, but inaccurate?
maybe post-election, they’ll go back to boring, erudite legal analyses.
===========
re. debate question “what have you learned from your strong wives?
> … (I’m recylcing a joke I heard last spring):
>
> [What KERRY might have said]: I developed my economic plan for the country from interacting with both my
> wives. Now I just need to find a rich country for the US to marry.
Um, John was watching the game with his campaign team in Ohio. There’s photographic evidence even: http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20041021/capt.sge.tyy14.211004153804.photo01.photo.default-379×269.jpg
Think World Cup Soccer. Thats how Red Sox fans view beating the Yankee’s.
Bruce: absolutely! It amazes me that people manage to claim, in the face of all evidence, that windsurfing equipment is prohibitively expensive. Bush’s cowboy boots almost certainly cost more than Kerry’s windsurfer.
Come on, people, it’s not like the identity of David Post is some big mystery. As on most blogs, most of the VC contributors have “about” links — David Post went to Yale and Georgetown, is a law prof, has a JD and a PhD. I just learned this 2 minutes ago, as could any of you. His whole CV is on line. Disagree with his views or don’t, but the “who is this guy?” approach is not only ad hominem, it’s lazy.
>Um, John was watching the game with his campaign team in Ohio.
But jif, that is a “fact” and therefore is something of value only to those pathetic liberals that occupy the “reality-based” world. David Post has faith that Big John, whatever he did, was somehow sleazy and nefarious, and faith is fact in his world.
aeon- lame, lots of people went to college, you know that wasn’t the question being asked here. But thanks for pointing it out, it amuses me that most of Bush’s base would consider Mr. Post’s CV to be pretty girly.
>Um, John was watching the game with his campaign team in Ohio.
But jif, that is a “fact” and therefore is something of value only to those pathetic liberals that occupy the “reality-based” world. David Post has faith that Big John, whatever he did, was somehow sleazy and nefarious, and faith is fact in his world.
aeon- lame, lots of people went to college, you know that wasn’t the question being asked here. But thanks for pointing it out, it amuses me that most of Bush’s base would consider Mr. Post’s CV to be pretty girly.
>Um, John was watching the game with his campaign team in Ohio.
But jif, that is a “fact” and therefore is something of value only to those pathetic liberals that occupy the “reality-based” world. David Post has faith that Big John, whatever he did, was somehow sleazy and nefarious, and faith is fact in his world.
aeon- lame, lots of people went to college, you know that wasn’t the question being asked here. But thanks for pointing it out, it amuses me that most of Bush’s base would consider Mr. Post’s CV to be pretty girly.
Different Chris, I was responding to this, primarily: “I don’t know who the hell he is, but this post provides me with all the empirical data I need to sufficiently answer that question to my satisfaction.” Also this commenter: “I too am unfamiliar with DP, but it appears that the VC is suffering a pre-election infusion of partisan hackery” — first of all, it’s not clear that because he’s criticizing Kerry, he must be a Bush partisan, and second of all, there’s that “who’s this guy?” theme again — so it was the question for some people, and that’s what I was referring to. I wasn’t taking a stand one way or the other on Kieran’s interpretation of Post’s post.
For the record, I don’t know how well Crooked Timber would stand up against the Volokh Conspiracy on the “partisan hack” scale. Also for the record, that’s mostly my fault.
Ted, I think the complaints are about expectations. Maybe things have been different in the past, but I expect frequent partisan posts (and perhaps occasionally what others might call hackery) on CT. They seem more out of place on VC — if they hadn’t been very rare, I probably wouldn’t have started reading VC regularly.
I do remember seeing yesterday Kerry explaining why he wasn’t attending the game. (I’ll post a link if I can dredge it up.) But basically, it was along the lines of, ‘at this point, winning the presidency is a far more serious matter, and I’m not going to take my eye off the ball’ (I’m paraphrasing, of course.)
Aeon, if I’m looking to David Post for legal advice or academic scholarship, I’ll follow the bloody links. All I’m interested in, however, is interesting and insightful political commentary. And I maintain this post contains sufficient information to assess his likely contribution in that category.
Ted: your self-deprecation is charming, but it’s not close.
speaking only for myself:
re hackery, kcindc has it right. as a first time visitor, I have no opinion on CT’s position on the scale.
re.”who’s this guy?”, djw has it right. res ipsa loquitur. not being familiar with a poster’s writing and caring who s/he “is” are different, as anyone not primarily interested in showing off would understand.
I See this as a lose-lose for Kerry. Baseball fans are incredibly loyal, which makes them, across the nation, more likely to resent the winner of the World’s Series. Yet, in Presidential races, the conventional wisdom is that the perceiveed winner will win. Given the Curse, I understand entirely Kerry’s distincing himself from the team’s success. How could one possibily calculate the odds?!?
I’m inclined to think that Kerry’s attendance at a game would be extremely disruptive; lots of secret service, lots of additional bag checks, and what not. This would probably irritate some fans, and that irritation might find its way onto Rush or Fox News.
Howie Kurtz does another toss of the loaded coin:
“By the way, how does Camouflage Kerry have all this time at the end of a campaign to go hunting?”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47633-2004Oct20.html
john kerry once walked by me while i was eating a pasta salad and he deliberately did not fart directly on top of my food, why not? he’s tall enough. what kind of elitist pansyism prevented him from farting in my food.
Well, yes, presumably Sen. Kerry does have a few other things on his agenda at the moment that might impact his being able to take off time and pop down to Fenway for a ballgame……
But, just IMO, if he doesn’t make make some sort of effort to show up in Boston for at least one of the Series games…… well, then that would be would be BAD politics, in spades. After all, Presidents come and go: baseball is forever - and besides, as (presumably) a Red Sox fan, who knows when he would get the next opportunity!
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review