Hotspots are multiplying all over the place, not just in Stateside Starbucks’, but even along the Paris metro. The only time I’ve used wifi so far was at CFP 2003 where it came in extremely handy for blogging the event. But think of it; free internet, wherever you go - how great is that going to be?
Jonathan Ezor of the Touro Law Center in Huntington, NY has written a piece on three potential problems of publicly available WiFi hotspots; misuse of anonymity, free-riding, and liability of providers. (He actually wrote it in June, I just stumbled upon it this morning.)
The first problem arises from the fact that publicly available wifi hotspots could do away with the need for users to register or identify themselves in some way, tying their computer to a personal identity in meatspace. In some set-ups, users of hotspots will be able to act anonymously, making detection of abuse (DOS or other computer related crime, spam, harassment, etc.) much, much harder. This would certainly be a problem for law enforcement. However, I think Ezor over-estimates current traceability on the internet minus the use of wifi, as this piece by Richard Clayton shows.
As things stand, the G8 Lyon working group on hi-tech crime has been working against anonymity in the communications infrastructure for several years now. Mostly, they’ve been worried about free traditional internet services and pay-as-you-go mobile phones, but you could see how wifi could become a real concern. I’m no expert on the tech aspects of this, (and thoughts/expertise are very welcome) but it seems to me that the software could be set up to make some sort of registration process mandatory. As wifi develops and the various pilot projects conclude, we may see more registration requirements, particularly for hotspots provided by public agencies or public/private partnerships. People can always provide false information, but that’s no different from users’ existing relationships with ISPs. And ultimately, we’ll see the law-abiding signing up, and the bad actors, as always, finding ways to escape monitoring and detection.
Free-riding seems to present another teething problem. What to do about companies or users who hog bandwidth and slow down or even stop publicly provided network access? This raises an interesting question - to what extent is a wifi hotspot a public good? It’s neither purely indivisible nor is it, depending on registration requirements and network monitoring capability, entirely non-excludable. Bandwidth is finite, so it is to some extent a rivalrous good. It all depends on who owns the system and how it’s set up of course. But, over time, the trade off between network efficiency and user convenience may also tend toward registration requirements which will provide a means to prevent bandwidth hogs doing their thing.
Ezor calls for a liability safe harbour for wifi hotspot providers, pointing to existing (US) liability exemptions from libel claims. If only libel claims were the biggest problem communications service providers faced. What is really needed is liability protection against IP and copyright claims. Under EU legislation (specifically, Article 12 on ‘mere conduit’ of the E-Commerce Directive) providers of communication services should be exempt from liability for the information they provide. But not only are content owners taking legal action against various European CSPs who could not possibly be expected to monitor every piece of information on their networks, but even this protection is now to be removed altogether by the draft IPR Enforcement Directive. So how about a future in which the RIAA sues not only grandfathers and 12 year old girls, but also local councils, hospitals, schools, and, heaven forbid, mass transit systems?
At least in the early days of wifi, the technology probably will be used by early-adopting criminals (amongst others). Forget infrastructure and rollout costs. Liability, risk, and the expense or impossibility of insuring against them are the most likely candidates to smother wifi at birth.
Anonymity is a benefit, not a bug, from where I sit. I’ve run open APs in Toronto and San Francisco for four+ years now, and one of my main reasons for doing so is to allow for anonymous speech, for the same reason that the framers of the Constitution supported anonymity.
As to free-riders: not only have I never had this problem (contention for my bandwidth), but I’ve never heard of anyone having this problem. My APs accomodate 10 users, my DSL lines deliver 1.5Mbs and most websites deliver < 60ks in throughput. In that scenario, contention can NEVER occur — unless you have one guy downloading an enormous file from Akamai or Bittorrent. It’s an edge case, it doesn’t really occur in the field, it’s not a problem that needs solving, unless you’ve got the economist’s irrational, superstitious dread of free-riding.
(In any event, the NoCat and other free-software open AP projects manage bandwidth contention either through fair apportionment or prioritization, and includes a login system)
Finally, is it really to an AP operator’s benefit to implicitly assert that she has the right, ability or duty to control her users’ actions? Safe harbors are nice, but I’d rather get common carrier status: I take all traffic, I don’t have the right, ability or duty to monitor it, and I send it on.
(Really, is anonymity in WiFi more socially corrosive than anonymity in prepaid mobile phones? How about anonymity in message-board posting?)
hey maria - nice blog. just thought i’d pop by and have a look. Me and the 100,000 others… :-)
keep in touch. jc
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review