A recent post on our blog about whether any of the situations in the Alanis Morrisette Song “Ironic” were, in fact, ironic, has garnered unexpected interest. I looked at the lyrics more carefully, and I think perhaps half could be said to qualify in an extended sense, that is, they seem like dramatic irony. So: “rain on your wedding day” is unquestionably not ironic, it’s just somewhat unfortunate. But I’ll give her “death-row pardon two minutes late”, I guess, if we accept a certain notion of irony I outline below.
Adam Kotsko contends, in comments, that there are no ironic situations. Bryan counters with dramatic irony. I remember learning about dramatic irony as a young lass, and the paradigmatic example is, as Bryan noted, Oedipus’ railing at Tiresias in the opening of Oedipus Rex about how he’s going to get the regicide who is responsible for the terrible miasma afflicting Thebes, when in fact he himself is responsible.
But now that I think about it, the concept seems a little underspecified. Is it that Oedipus’ words are (dramatically) ironic, because they mean something different that what he intends by them? He places a terrible curse on person x, and turns out to be person x. Or is it rather that the whole situation is ironic, such that if it were performed as a ballet, but the same facts were stipulated to be true in the ballet, it would be dramatic irony? If we accept the latter formulation, then we can think that there are dramatically ironic situations in real life, just when something happens which, if it happened in a play, would be ironic.
But even on this account it’s not clear what the criteria are. It’s obviously ironic that Darth Vader is Luke’s father (because this is just the Oedipus situation in sci-fi drag). Is it ironic when Romeo kills himself because Juliet is dead, even though she is actually alive? Not really, I don’t think. But maybe it’s some sort of tragic irony? It seems sufficiently parallel to the Oedipus case that by rights it ought to be ironic. Obviously inversion or reversal plays a role in this account, some sort of precise upending of expectations. Or perhaps a kind of negative lottery, in which a bad thing happens against huge odds. So, although it’s not ironic if it rains on your wedding day in Oregon, perhaps it could be ironic if it rained on a wedding which took place at a Berber encampment in the Sahara, or at Ayers Rock (where I was once rained on while I camped.)
But lots of things which confound expectations aren’t remotely ironic; say I am invited to a wedding between Jack and Jill, and I expect that they are a heterosexual couple, but it turns out they are lesbians, and “Jack” is short for “Jaqueline”. This is not ironic, it’s just mildly surprising. And the song “Ironic” contains something which fulfills the negative lottery criterion, but doesn’t really seem very ironic to me, just dumb: “It’s like ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife.” What are the odds that one of those 10,000 spoons wouldn’t be a knife! (John thinks this is ironic, however. I can see it if I squint a little.)
How’s this one: you are (you believe) alone in the desert, without another soul around for 100 miles, and you fire a gun in the air. The bullet traces a fatal parabola and lands in the head of someone who was sitting behind a rock, killing her. Ironic, or not? Is it ironic to be hoist on your own petard, to set a trap for someone else which you then fall into, as in every action movie ever, when the bad guy looks in terror at the ticking clock of his own bomb, moments before he is blown to bits? Would it be ironic if it turned out that a given action taken to fight terrorism ended up causing more people to become terrorists than it killed or imprisoned as terrorists, so that the situation were a net loss? Was it ironic that I had used the blog post title “Isn’t It Ironic” just a day or so before to blog about extreme ironing, or just coincidental? Have at it, you ironical types.
Alanis gets a lot of stick for that song.
“It’s like ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife.”
How far removed is this from “A horse, a horse — my kingdom for a horse”? Is Richard III’s situation at that point ironic? If so, would vigorously objecting to the spoons case then be ironic as well?
The title “Ironic” is meant to be ironic, meaning it isn’t.
HTH
Irony is a form of utterance that postulates a double audience, consisting of one party that hearing shall hear and shall not understand, and another party that, when more is meant than meets the ear, is aware, both of that “more” and of the outsider’s incomprehension.He goes on to list three main categories of irony: Socratic irony (Socrates pretends ignorance to manipulate the dogmatists and to amuse his followers), dramatic irony (the point being that Sophocles’s audience knew the story already), and irony of fate (the idea being that most people ignorantly expect an orderly or a cooperative natural world but we the clued in don’t). He says it’s important not to apply “irony of fate” to every “trivial oddity” - which rules out the wedding day example in my book. And Richard’s situation isn’t ironic in my view - if we knew that a horse would cause the kingdom’s downfall it might be, but as is it’s just tragic.
Anyway, this article is largely based, but also expands, on Fowler.
I don’t think rain on the wedding day could be seen as ironic, even in a dramatic context, because the rain would most probably mean the same thing to the audience and the characters in the drama.
“How’s this one: you are (you believe) alone in the desert, without another soul around for 100 miles, and you fire a gun in the air. The bullet traces a fatal parabola and lands in the head of someone who was sitting behind a rock, killing her. “
I would consider it ironic if you did so out of frustration that you were alone in the desert and could not find your way out, the other person knew the way out, and you did not find out that you had killed them.
I also consider that the Romeo situation is technically dramatically ironic, but is never experienced as such while viewing the play because irony seems to require some detachment from the events of the moment. Thus the drawing out of Tiresias’ speech I think, in order to fully develop the irony of the situation for the audience.
Of all Shakespearian plays I only really find Lear to be filled with irony.
Try bringing this up at popbitch.
Is it ironic that the most reliable example of irony on the web is American?
The audience is, of course, key: someone must know the known unknown (or sometimes, the unknown unknown) for it to be ironic.
The “irony of fate” requires erecting a fourth wall: if an audience were to have been watching this scene unfold, they would, indeed, have found it ironic. —Which is maybe why it’s so popular nowadays.
Rain on your wedding day would be ironic if, say, you had moved the date from spring to summer, at great expense to yourself and inconvenience to your guests, in order to avoid bad weather.
“SPY” magazine covered this topic over 10 years ago. And they were much funnier.
The greatest irony is that the song confirmed most Brits’ belief that Americans don’t understand irony, despite being written and recorded by a Canadian…
How about “football star whose heroic sacrifice is supposed to silence all questions about our interventions was shot by his own troops”?
How about “football star whose heroic sacrifice is supposed to silence all questions about our interventions was shot by his own troops”?
Posted by Arthur D. Hlavat
That goes beyond Socratic Irony into Platonic Irony, I think.
I was recently persuaded to desist in using my neologism, “alanironic”. I think we can agree, however, that whatever the hell she thinks “irony” is, it’s interesting and a word to describe it would be useful.
The “dissociation” line of discussion is interesting to me because I think it has cultural relevance. But I’m not convinced that true irony, no knives but ten-thousand spoons irony, and dissociated irony aren’t all distinct (though distantly related).
Hasn’t Alanis’ use of the word been in usage long / frequently enough for it to be added to the dictionary?
“…it’s interesting and a word to describe it would be useful.”
How about: annoying, frustrating, cussed? inconvenient or disastrous (depending on the consequences)? Unfortunate - literally if one takes fortune to be author the play to which life is analogous. Also consider ‘tragic’ or ‘foreshadowing’ and of course ‘poetic justice’
Sure, there is a family resemblance among the situations, but it’s worth distinguishing the different ways in which expectation and surprise interact. I’d like to save ‘ironic’ for cases where there are two intended audiences, one that gets a second meaning, and where the situation is somehow substantial enough to transcend mere sarcasm.
There’s a metaphysical element too: a rainy wedding might be ironic if Alanis were a pompous meteorologist, and some powerful being arranged for the rain precisely to demonstrate to the guests that she was wrong. There are the two audiences, one the butt of the joke, the other laughing. Leave out the god or demon, and it’s only schadenfreude (or an obnoxious cousin saying loudly “You picked a good day to get married, moron.”) Poor Alanis, if she’d only written her songs in a different time and place, she might have had a stronger claim; however, that still ain’t irony.
‘Isn’t it a bummer?’ would have scanned perfectly. Why that wasn’t used, I do not know.
`Isn’t it a bummer?’ would have scanned perfectly. Why that wasn’t used, I do not know.
Isn’t that ironic?
Don’t you think?
Isn’t a free ride when you’ve already paid ironic? I’d say that it’s sort of situationally ironic.
Czeslaw Milosz called irony “the glory of slaves”. I would add to slaves many western europeans. Is there consolation in irony? Think how small that world must be. But have at it, irreverant ironists! As for Alanis Morissette, anyone get Bob Dylan’s “new” live cd from 1964?
Since any action situation involves a framework of meaning, I don’t see why the notion of irony should be confined to the discursive level. However, I don’t know that there can exactly be criteria for irony, since irony is itself a subversion of criterial meaning. Clearly it involves an unthematized meta-level commentary on an “object-level” meaning or intention, in such a way as to bring out the surplus in signifying possibilities. It is related to but differs from straight negation, involving something like a simultaneous negation and reinscription of an affirmation. (Foucault’s phrase “non-affirmative affirmation” comes to mind here, though that always struck me as indicative of the impossibility of living purely ironically.) But I don’t think that the “audience” interpretation of irony would do. Irony clearly derives from the play of levels involved in the intrinsically communicative, interactive constitution of meaning, (which is why those with no sense of irony are to be distrusted), but its “knowingness” does not resolve back into knowing, which would be criterial, (so that, e.g., Oedipus’ fate would simply be deserved and there would be no mystery to it.) And under that interpretation, we would never just come upon or encounter irony in our solitude, let alone self-irony. Nor do I think irony is necessarily amusing, nor superior. (Consider the analogy with absurdity, which can either be amusing or horrifying.) It is perhaps because it lacks exact criteria that we seek criteria for irony, since we all want to dare to be hip.
When great Birnham Wood comes upon Dunsinane Hill (sp.?), due to entirely plausible “mechanical” causes, is the irony that the weird sisters’ “supernatural” oracle resolves naturalistically or is it that Macbeth credulously believes the oracle, but draws the inference that it signifies something naturally impossible? My intuition is that there is no irony there; it’s more like the swamp of proto-irony.
The excerpt from Fowler’s Modern English Usage cited by rilkefan—that irony addresses the clued-in portion of a double audience—parallels Strauss’s claim that the philosophers wrote between the lines in order to conceal their wisdom from the many. Strauss saw such esotericism as part of a routine strategy of dissembling. Deception of the unwitting seems to be an aspect of irony as well.
The Glenn Reynolds sentence in the previous post is ironic.
The comedian Ed Byrne used to do a whole routine on this song. One bit I remember was his take on “A traffic jam when you’re already late” - he points out that it would be ironic if you happened to be the town planner responsible for that particular bit of road. And were on your way to a meeting about relieving traffic conjestion.
“a trope that involves incongruity between what is expected and what occurs” is what I got in the dictionary for the meaning of “irony” (one of the meanings - the one closest to the song’s usage).
Rain on a wedding day is ironic in the incongruity sense because of dramatic cliche. In dramatic cliche (typical Hollywood movies, etc) wedding days are sunny and funerals are rainy. The example of 10,000 spoons is another case: if you had 10,000 utensils, and need a knife, you’d expect about 1/3 to be knives. It may not be the best examples or most evocative sort of irony, but it’s in there.
Sorry to be a stickler but this is a sticklerish topic to begin with: “dramatic irony”, as far as I have been taught, refers to a very specific dramatic setup (normally in the theatre) whereby the audience posseses knowledge that the protagonist does not have. For example, we might know that Road Runner has already eaten the seeds (check my erudite cultural references) but Wile E Coyote is ignorant of this fact. As we watch him put himself in danger through his ignorance, this is dramatic irony. I don’t think it means that the occurence is actually “ironic”, what is ironic is that we know but he dosn’t. That is where the irony, presumably, lies. The term “dramatic irony”, however, has been bandied and debased beyond this technical specificity.
Most of the situations in the song fit the irony of fate idea.
Wins the lottery and dies the next day—the man is unusually lucky, but his luck is followed up immediately by his death. A well ordered, fair, cooperative and pro-human universe wouldn’t do that.
Man afraid of flying puts it off his whole life but when he finally flies is caught on a crashing plane. Crashing planes aren’t very common. His fear was mostly irrational. Yet the one plane he flys on ends up crashing. I don’t think ‘Isn’t it a bummer’ quite covers it.
Meeting the man of my dreams, and meeting his beautiful wife. Once again, a cooperative universe wouldn’t do that to you. This is reinforced by silly societal expectations. Meeting the man of your dreams is supposed to be a key moment. Realizing it can’t work out is an enormous let-down in that context. Notice the “beautiful” wife—suggesting either that the singer isn’t beautiful enough, or that there isn’t a chance to steal him away.
Why are there 10,000 spoons and 0 knives when you wanted a knife? Come on!
I’ll give you the wedding day isn’t ironic.
The fly in your wine, it depends on how poor you are and how special you thought the wine was….
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review