David Adesnik doesn’t believe there’s much in the way of Iraqi resistance outside the “Sunni Triangle.” Tacitus disagrees and gives a list of U.S. fatalities. David rebuts him, saying
Tacitus most definitely has a good eye for detail, but are ten or so fatalities supposed to persuade me that there is real resistance outside the Sunni Triangle?
Well, it’d probably convince the hell out of me if I’d been one of the soldiers killed. Except it wouldn’t matter, because I’d be dead.
This is kind of a cheap riposte from me, and the two may have already resolved their differences about the substantive issue. But it’s worth policing the armchair generalship if only because tossing around phrases like “Are ten or so fatalities supposed to persuade me” is not a good habit for a responsible Oxblogger to have. It’s a bit like that Economist article that Daniel picked on recently for casually making a distinction between hunger and “mere uncertainty about where the next meal was coming from.”
How many of these attacks even come from Iraqis? One of Salam Pax’s friends writes: “I think we are already hot listed as the best [destination] this summer on the [Bin-Laden Tourism Board] . For those kids who missed Afghanistan and find Chechnya too far away, why not try Iraq?” And goes on to describe a conversation with a young Syrian who apparently came to Iraq in search of jihad, only to end up in an American-run hospital.
Kieran,
I don’t know whether this is a general thing, but on my computer since Monday on Crooked Timber the ‘medium’ font size setting is too large, and to make it readable it has to be on ‘small’, which is too small for most other websites.
As I said, it could be just me as I am using a laptop and quite an old one at that
Matthew
Bill Maudlin drew a cartoon in WWII of two soldiers (his Willie and Joe) in a fox hole, and one of them says to the other: “The Hell if this isn’t the most important hole in the world. I’m in it.”
That being said, Tacitus was being disingenous about the casualties. There have been more murders in Philadelphia this year than US casualties in Iraq. Get a grip.
If the media payed as much attention to every murder in the USA, (or even California, since its supposed to be the same size as Iraq) I think people would have a different perspective on things.
Yeah, and you could die falling down in your bathtub.
More seriously, if I had supported the war when it started, based on what I knew then, these casualties would not bother me now. My understanding then was that it was an optional, proactive (aggressive) war meant to enormously strengthen the American position in that part of the world, and had little to do with Saddam per se. I still believe that my understanding of the war at that time was correct, and was close enough to what the military planners were actually thinking. They said yes, I said no, to the same question.
The problem is that this isn’t what we signed up for. The war was deceptively sold. That has a magnifying effect on casualties.
And of course, for the record: the US troops in Iraq are fewer than the population of Philadelphia. And contrary to what you America-haters out there think, we Americans are not proud of the high murder rate in American inner cities. We actually think of that as a very bad thing, not as a baseline of normality. We would prefer to take North Dakota as an ideal — a state of over half a million people where the murder rate, in a good year, is zero.
How the hell does saying “Look over there, people are dying there too!” come even close to wiping out the sheer horror of the fact that Americans are dying far from home for no good reason?
Let’s ignore for now the fact that the comparison is wildly inaccurate due to the simple truth that Philadelphia has a much higher population than the US militiary population of Iraq (or is eric implying that Iraqis aren’t people since their deaths are not being counted in this “murder rate”?). I’m sure Philadelphia’s murder rate would drop significantly too if we only counted a very small portion of the people in Philadelphia for statistical purposes.
Yes, someone here needs to get a grip (on critcal thinking).
Adding to what zizka and dop said—probably most of the murder victims in Philadelphia are not as visibly and heavily armed as U.S. soldiers in Iraq. The vast majority of people who kill U.S. soldiers are motivated specifically to kill U.S. soldiers—that’s resistance for you. (Not to mention that people who get murdered in Philadelphia were not specifically ordered into harm’s way by the U.S. government.)
Stop all the crocodile tears for the US soldiers in Iraq already.
None of you cared about the soldiers in the first place, your bleating now ring false.
Now, Philadelphia does have about the same population as Baghdad—granted, there aren’t as many AK-47’s and RPG’s lying around. If there were, things would be a lot more noisy around here.
But people already have hit on one thing that isn’t getting any news, and that’s the number of Baathists, terrorists etc. that have been killed in the midst of the rest of the attacks. It ain’t just GI’s dying. It would be interesting to see if what the numbers are. The country put up with 50,000 dead conscripts in the 1960’s—It can handle a few dead hundred volunteers now.
I’d love to see what the you all would have said during WWI or WWII.
And since it looks like you all didn’t support the war in the first place, nothing that happens now is going to satisfy you.
I tell ya what….
Before you guys spout things you know nothing about why not do some research????
start here…
http://www.njlawman.com/2002_line_of_duty_deaths.htm
Then tell me how horrible the numbers are coming out of Iraq.
Is anyone telling us we should get out of New Jersy because it is a Quagmire?
Paul
NJ is a quagmire.
Eric,
You have NO basis for saying that the folks on this blog didn’t “care about soldiers in the first place”. None, zero, zip. There may be some stridently anti-military lefties out there, surely, but they are a teensy-tiny minority & not represented here. Everyone I know — and I move in a pretty liberal crowd — is 100% behind our troops, and gets pretty F**KING MAD when told that they aren’t behind the troops simply because they have no confidence in the empty suit who is their commander in chief.
Now, there is a point here about how many casualties is enough to make a point over — you are surely right that a few hundred casualties would not have been a good reason to call off the invasion of Europe in the 1940s! I don’t think that most folks are calling for us to pull out of Iraq, so much as pointing out that things are going pretty poorly in Iraq, and hoping to put some pressure on the administration to get its act together. The issue is not one simply of how many Americans are dying, but how many are dying in no small part because of this administration’s gross incompetence.
If the only way to show support for American troops is never to question whether losing them was necessary, then call me a traitor.
That site comes from NJ, but the 156 lawman deaths reported from 2002 are not from New Jersey. That’s from the whole US plus Puerto Rico, and it includes on-duty deaths from all causes including auto accidents and heart attacks. Only about a third seem to be from gunfire (I spot-checked the first bunch of names).
Get back to us when you figure out what you were trying to say.
Eric, I more or less agreed with you. If I, and the American people, supported the actual war we are fighting, these casualties wouldn’t be that bad. But the war we got is different than the one we were sold, and and I never bought the war in the first place. What problem do you have with that?
Philadelphia murders do have a rationale. Some are murdered for their money. There are husbands who murder their wives to get out marriages and avoid alimony — wives who murder husbands because they are cheating bastards. There are drug dealers murdering rival drug dealers. There are convenience store thieves who were a little too loose with the pistol. And so on.
However, the death of US soldiers in Iraq increasingly has no rationale. What are they dying for? To introduce free enterprise into Iraq?
They certainly aren’t dying defending this country against terrorists — what terrorists from Iraq have ever attacked this country? Are they defending good Iraqis against worse Iraqis? Well, shouldn’t the good Iraqis be “allowed” by the occupying power to defend themselves?
Surely, if Eric is serious about the logic of his comparison, there’s only one conclusion: the troops should come home as soon as possible. If they get murdered in Philadelphia, at least they can die knowing they died for a reason.
“Ten or so” deaths are regrettable, but policy cannot be driven by a relatively small number of deaths.
Oh, a fight. Goody.
“The country put up with 50,000 dead conscripts in the 1960’s”
Actually it was more like 58,000 US combat fatalities, both enlisted and conscript, over more than a decade. And the country didn’t put up with it. Politicial will to fight an apparently endless war was sandbagged by the bodybags coming home.
And:
“but policy cannot be driven by a relatively small number of deaths.”
Define ‘relatively’. Just over .01 of the US population were killed in 911 (much lower percentage rate that US troop deaths in Iraq) yet that sure drove a fundamental policy shift in the US and worldwide.
Numbercrunching like this may sound heartless but, hey, you started it.
OK, I know this is a very trivial point, but just in the interest of accuracy, looking at the 1970-2000 murder statistics for North Dakota, I couldn’t find a year with no murders (Zizka’s definition of a “good” year), although there was one year with only one murder … the average seemed to be about 7 or 8, with a high of 15 …
As someone says, smarter monkeys, please.
The murder rate in Philadelphia for 2001: 20.4 per 100,000 in the course of a year.
The death rate of our troops in Iraq: 180 per 100,000 (if I just take Brit Hume’s count and assume no more will die this year)
Which means that if Philadelphia’s murder rate were even close, there would be 2700 people dying to murder in Philly every year.
(Hands tight, now pull hard and your head should pop right out of your behind.)
Dakota Kid: That one guy was really a suicide. Trust me.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review