Via MaxSpeak comes a link to an excellent interview with Karl Marx conducted sometime in the last month, apparently. Karl has lost none of his vitality, despite having been dead for some time. His analysis is as trenchant as his invective is unrelenting. Who is an “insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of the ordinary bourgeois intelligence” and who is “so easy to comprehend, so stupendously unoriginal, so devastatingly tautological”? Read it and see.
Marx likes the YANKEES? I would have made him out to be a Red Sox fan.
I’ve never understood the enduring academic fascination with Marxism, which seems to me a singularly useless tool for analysing what happens in markets.
It is verging on the banal to claim as an insight that buyers seek to buy at as low a price as they can find while producers want to sell at as high a price as the market will bear.
If capitalists always act in their class interest, how come so many capitalists in the computer business keep ganging up against Microsoft?
Can someone, please, explain?
Courtesy of philosopher Phil Gasper: “The claim that Marx wanted to dedicate Capital to Darwin is a myth, first propagated by Isaiah Berlin ironically enough, and long refuted. See Margaret A. Fay, “Did Marx offer to dedicate Capital to Darwin?” (Journal of the History of Ideas 39 [1978]: 133-46) and Lewis S. Feuer, “Is the ‘Darwin-Marx correspondence’ authentic?” (Annals of Science 32: 1-12).”
Is this the last of zombie Mikhail Bakunin!?
C’mon! You can’t ressurect Marx and not expect the shambling corpse of Bakunin to show up too.
Thanks Brian. I feel sheepish as I’ve told that story to numerous students over the years.
Bob: Marx was one of the first (if not the first) thinker to see the novelty of capitalism as a social system and the full scope of the transformation it was going to create. As for class interest — capitalists acting in their class interests is like you acting in the interests of your family. It doesn’t mean that you won’t have fights with your brother or your wife, but you will tend to stick together against outsiders, yes? You don’t see a lot of capitalists working hard to strengthen the union movement to drive up their competitors labor costs.
As for Marx’s usefulness in analyzing capitalism, his prediction that capitalism would be plagued by periodic crises of overproduction and overly low demand (what we today call the business cycle) turned out to be quite accurate before Keyenes and central bank economic management — pre WWII recessions and depressions dwarfed what we see today. The prediction of progressive immiseration of the working class doesn’t look so good, unless you think it is relative immiseration he is talking about.
"Marx tried, and although he erred in his main doctrines, he did not try in vain. He opened and sharpened our eyes in many ways. A return to pre-Marxian social science is inconceivable. All modern writers are indebted to Marx, even if they do not know it. This is especially true of those who disagree with his doctrines": thus Karl Popper (The Open Society and Its Enemies, ch. 13). The 2nd volume of Popper’s book is largely a long argument with Marx, and I find it a little uncharitable (though not uncharacteristic) of Marx’s specter to be so dismissive of our other Uncle Karl. Jon Elster’s Making Sense of Marx is a good place for those familiar with mainstream economics to gain an appreciation of what the Moor’s most valuable contributions were; G. A. Cohen’s Karl Marx’s Theory of History is good too. Of course the most valuable contributions have not always been the ones which held the greatest appeal to Marxists; that, in a way, is the topic of Leszek Kolakowski’s magisterial Main Currents of Marxism.
Hi Cosma -
I wonder about Elster’s book. It’s based on a very deep knowledge of the sources (an amazing knowledge, really) and Elster’s critical acuity is remarkable. But he seems to take all the textual material, remove it from context, shred it into a huge pile of sentence-sized fragments, and then attempts to reassemble them in the light of his own metholological commitments. Unsurprisingly, Marx doesn’t come out looking too good.
The contrast with Gerry Cohen’s book is an instructive one, as he’s also committed to the analytic approach to Marx, but uses those tools to produce something that feels like a very sharp but coherent characterization of some of Marx’s central ideas, in a way that Elster’s book doesn’t.
This isn’t to deny the force of many of Elster’s particular criticisms, of course, especially if you buy into his views about methodological individualism (though I think even Elster himself has relaxed those in more recent writing).
Anyone reading Elster’s book ought to read, in conjunction with it, the essay by Robert Paul Wolff (himself an analytically-minded philosopher) on Elster: “Methodological Individualism and Marx: Some Remarks on Jon Elster, Game Theory, and Other Things,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 469-486. An easier read than either Cohen or Elster, but one that assimilates much that is of value from these two authors, as well as Roemer, Wood, and others, is Jonathan Wolff’s splendid book Why Read Marx Today? (OUP, 2002).
Kieran: I think that the characteristic of Elster’s book you point out is actually something of a virtue, for the particular purpose of persuading a mainstream economist, or someone of that ilk, that there’s something to Marx. John Roemer’s work, which I should’ve mentioned, has something of the same quality, though without either Elster’s comprehensiveness, or conveying the impression that Marx tried to be Elster but Hegel kept breaking through. (As it happens, I find methodological individualism very appealing, but I used to be the village reductionist in Santa Fe.)
Brian: both the Wolffs sound interesting; thanks for the references.
The remark that the myth that Marx offered to dedicate Kapital to Darwin was ‘first propagated by Isaiah Berlin’ needs some slight qualification — to ‘first propagated in the English-speaking world’. Berlin himself got the idea from the most authoritative Russian sources then available to him — Karl Marks, Datyzhizhni i deyatel’nosti. Institut Marksa-Engelsa-Lenina pri TSK VKP (B), ed. V. ADoratsky, Moscow 15.6.1934, which in turn is based on Karl Marx:Chronik Seines Lebens in Einzedaten, zusammengestellt vom Marx-Engels-Lenin Institut, Moskau (Marx-Engels Verlag, Moskau, 1934, ed. E. Zobel). (See Berlin’s reply to Fay, in the Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol 39 No 3 (Jul-Sep 1978), p. 519
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review