I do not generally hold people in contempt because of their profession, their job or their calling. But copy editors! That is something different. Not as bad, I will grant, as war criminals or child molesters, they nevertheless belong in one of the very lowest categories of human intelligence and indeed morality. You will object that copy editors perform a most useful and necessary function, turning what is often ill-formed and error-strewn text into something more presentable. This, too, I will grant. However, it is no excuse for what copy editors also do - which is to interfere with people’s painfully-crafted stuff when there is no reason whatever for doing so, other than some quirk in the particular copy-editing mind which is at work….
Hmm. As an author, I share some of Norm’s frustrations. Indeed I’ve felt them keenly very recently. But I also once worked as a freelance copyeditor to supplement my then pitiful income as a 0.5 temporary lecturer. I remember having to justify myself to desk editors and production managers and hoping, hoping that they’d give me another book to work on. Most of these people are ill-paid casual workers constantly having to prove their worth. I’m sure that’s where the urge to over-correct comes from — to demonstrate that you did something for that miserable payment.
I see too much prose which definitely needs a good copy editor. I think the far lower species of human being is the manager who decides to forgo hiring copy editors at all since, after all, Word has built-in spelling and grammar checkers.
I tend to sympathize with copy editors. When I was in college, I held, for a while, the position of punctuation cop for a student magazine. I’m not the most conscientious punctuator in the world, but I soon learned that most of the young writers on the staff had not the slightest clue how to punctuate correctly. The most common mistake, heavily favored over standard usage, was to put the comma after rather than before the word and used to join two clauses. The second most common was blatant misuse of the apostrophe. Through ruthless campaigning I ended up vetting all the body copy in the magazine, but titles and photo captions were constantly slipping past me to the layout people, and we paid the price over and over in misplaced commas and, truckload’s of bungled apostrophe’s.
Perhaps professionals are better about this.
How interestingly this discussion is framed. Are copy editors, Chris Bertram invites us to wonder, really “one of the very lowest categories of human intelligence and indeed morality,” or is this perhaps a moderate overstatement?
I’ve done copyediting, and I’ve worked with lots of copyeditors. As an editor, I’ve probably had occasion to be annoyed with bad copyedits more often than even the most prolific author. So I have plenty of observations about how copyediting is often handled, and how the (often anonymous) copyeditor gets used as a way of shifting blame for decisions that have actually made by someone else.
But I don’t really feel like being forthcoming in a thread where the basic question is whether, for instance, my wife is “one of the very lowest categories of human intelligence and indeed morality.” Funny about that.
Goodness Patrick, what a reaction!
First, Norm’s comments were deliberately over the top and tounge in cheek. Second, I was standing up for the copyeditors . (Or so I thought!) And as you well know, I have the greatest respect for both you and Teresa.
I have to agree with Norm here. Copy editors are evil.
Of course, Norm gives away the game when he says that the copy editor’s evil flaw is to “interfere with people’s painfully-crafted stuff.”
Unless you are writing fiction, there is simply no good reason to get upset at about 98 percent of what decent, conscientious copy editors do. Yet people such as Norm continue to insist on blaming the grammatical messenger, rather than working to find verbiage that is both clear and felicitous.
Not that I haven’t met awful ce’s in my day, and not that their awfulness isn’t especially irritating because of its petty and arbitrary quality. But that is all the more reason merely to publish the name of the awful copy editor or contractor of said awful copy editor in question. Sunshine is the surest cleanser for corruption of all kinds.
A friend of mine is a copyeditor and I’ve been contemplating scenerios in which I can slip her the mauscript for my novel and still have her be a friend.
I have been copyedited often — but only once by a true professional. Usually it’s painful (especially student law review editors…), but that experience convinced me that all my writing could stand the application of good copyediting. I think good copyeditors are hard to find, and probably beyond my means, but a treasure when you have one.
I was an in-house copyeditor at a biology journal between college and grad school. Most of what I did involved forcing things to conform with house style and correcting obvious grammatical errors. The biggest issue was when hyphens were necessary (“protein-synthesizing enzymes,” if it’s the enzyme that synthesizes the protein) and the difference between “compare with” and “compare to.” My managing editor told me once that she had been unable to sleep because she was worrying about an argument we had over when to use “comparable to.” My biggest triumph, I suppose, was when despite my total ignorance of biology I was able to point out to an author that their figure didn’t match their caption, saving them from publishing the wrong figure.
The experience left me with considerable sympathy for copy editors. I’ve often wished that the philosophy paper I was reading had been gone over by a philosophically knowledgeable copy editor; but copy editors who are actually learned in the subject are rarer than diamonds. Perhaps I should start a business. (And if you are copy editing, it’s good to distinguish orders from suggestions.)
I’m amazed that, in a comments thread about copyediting, no one’s called Chris on “tounge in cheek”.
The worst is either having a friend edit your writing, or editing your friend’s. It’s so personal. If you don’t agree with their helpful suggestions on your piece, or if you secretly wish to rewrite large chunks of theirs…ugh.
I try to avoid it at all costs.
I’m afraid that, according ‘Butcher’ (the fount of all copy-editing wisdom) the hyphen should be there in ‘copy-editor’ and all its cognates. But who gives a toss? Certainly not sensible professional copy-editors like me — all we care about is consistency within a piece. It can be annoying, though, when authors reverse some of one’s changes of a kind and not others of that kind, especially when they get all high-handed about their text having been mucked about with. There’s a very strong correlation between the intellectual quality of the content of a piece and the cleanliness of the copy in which it’s delivered to the publisher — that’s what I’ve found, anyway…
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review