Over at Volokh, recent addition Jim Lindgren is making me regret once more their loss of Jacob Levy. Here he is complaining about the supposedly appalling moderator bias that caused Bush to lose last night’s debate (again):
Given Theresa (“no blood for oil”) Heinz Kerry, the only hard question John Kerry got all night was “I’d like to ask each of you, what is the most important thing you’ve learned from these strong women?”—and Kerry got to listen to Bush’s answer first. UPDATE: — OK, so Kerry should have answered the question about what he learned from his strong wife in this way (I’m recylcing a joke I heard last spring): [What KERRY might have said]: I developed my economic plan for the country from interacting with both my wives. Now I just need to find a rich country for the US to marry.
Clearly, Jim feels that whereas marrying into money is unseemly, being born into it is evidence of one’s good judgment. Is the parallel lesson that the US can spend the next 40 years drinking, partying and wasting Dad’s money on incompetent schemes, but still have things work out great?
Jim Lindgreen is single-handedly trying to turn what I used to regard as the best read on the Internet into something resembling Instapundit without the links. Please, Eugene, make the silly man go away.
Jim is right about one thing: Schiefer was a horrible moderator. That question was just one of many softballs the candidates fielded last night. This is the kind of question you expect to hear in a Barbara Walters interview - not in a presidential debate. It’s no wonder more people watched the Red Sox/Yankee game.
Brayden, Jim’s complaint was not that Scheifer was a bad moderator, but that he was a biased moderator. On that count, Jim was wrong.
For the record— even though a) I was rooting for Kerry and b) I don’t think Bush needs any help to lose debates— I thought Scheifer was pretty clearly biased, throwing meatball after meatball to Kerry and phrasing questions in peculiarly loaded ways.
Schiefer didn’t make Bush lie about his bin Laden quote, or make him take the bizarre tack of telling people over and over again that they’re really better off than they think they are (Guardsmen, veterans, the unemployed). Bush did all that all on his own. But, yeah, I’d certainly judge Scheifer to be disqualified from future debate moderation duties.
Well - why couldn’t we have a candidate in this election who is neither a drunk-turned-messianic-christian nor billionaire’s husband? Y’know, someone like Kucinich, Dean or even Clark.
Yo, what does “abb” stand for?
True, it does mean ‘anybody’. Nevertheless…
The preposterous imputation of liberal bias to Bob Schieffer aside, the right seems mostly to object to the debates framing the election as a referendum on the Bush presidency. But everybody seemed to think that Reagan’s “are you better off now than you were four years ago” was a fair criterion in 1980. Why isn’t it a fair criterion now?
Do you think this is a fair characterization of Lindgren’s post? Always beware ellipses. Had you quoted the post in full, it would have been obvious that Lindgren updated his post to add a joke he had heard.
I thought Kerry’s line was pretty funny. Would it have been fair to report on it without noting the obvious humor he intended?
Obviously, this is no big deal. But that’s exactly the point. Too often, political blogs stretch a point, it seems to me, simply to come up with something to post. Frankly, I’d put most of Slate’s “Kerryisms” and “Bushisms” in this category, as well as this comment about Lindgren.
If you don’t like the guy, find something more substantive to criticize. But, if you have to use ellipses, you might reconsider.
Volokh lost Jacob Levy? That must have happened while I wasn’t paying attention. Can anyone fill me in on what happened?
“what is the most important thing you’ve learned from these strong women?”
I think the soft ball part of it is that Teressa isnt a “string woman” she came from a well off family, flitte around in swtizerland then married a fortune.
The correct responce would be that no she’s a rich brat
Quite frankly, I’ve often wondered at some portion of the blogosphere’s fascination with the Volokh site. Sometimes it’s ok, sometimes it’s dreadful, sometimes it’s good, rarely is it insightful. It’s better than Reynolds’s sight, but that’s not much of a compliment.
I have to speak up in favor of volokh.com. I think people read it because Eugene’s thoughtful style makes him a rightwinger that lefties can turn to for sane analysis. His posts are carefully argued, and he usually addresses the opposing view without mockery, ad hominem dismissal, or unfair characterization of the argument. In short, he seems to be arguing in good faith even if you disagree with him. Levy was also good, as was Tyler Cowen back when he used to post more.
I have to speak up in favor of volokh.com. I think people read it because Eugene’s thoughtful style makes him a rightwinger that lefties can turn to for sane analysis. His posts are carefully argued, and he usually addresses the opposing view without mockery, ad hominem dismissal, or unfair characterization of the argument. Also, he normally sticks fairly close to his area of expertise, so his posts are usually more valuable than those of a generalist or a political junkie. In short, he seems to be arguing in good faith even if you disagree with him. Levy was also good, as was Tyler Cowen back when he used to post more
Do you think this is a fair characterization of Lindgren’s post?
Yeah I do, and the link’s right there. But I’ll put a bit more quote in to make it absolutely clear.
Jacob: This demonstrates the difficulty of judging bias. I thought the moderator had a pro-Bush bias, and that Kerry got the bulk of the “gotcha” questions.
I thought I saw softballs in both directions (Kerry esp. had big ones on the min. wage and “do you oppose the backdoor draft?”), but Bush had a few as well. The social security questions were ill-informed and poorly phrased, which worked against Kerry.
I think the soft ball part of it is that Teressa isnt a “string woman” she came from a well off family, flitte around in swtizerland then married a fortune. The correct responce would be that no she’s a rich brat
Whereas George Bush, on the other hand…?
Jim was enough to make me break out the volokh.com/?exclude=jim addtion. Works like a charm.
Kieran, the link is broken for me; though the only other post from Lindgren I’ve read supports your overall estimate. (MoveOn says Bush said that Saddam sought uranium from Niger! But Bush said “Africa”!) I agree with catfish about the Volokhs overall, though.
Giles, I agree with you that Teresa Heinz is not “string.”
I only had half an eye on it, with sound off and closed-captioning on. If the “marrying up” episode is the one that caused me to look up from the keyboard at John Kerry’s huge sustained shit-eating ear-to-ear grin…..it may have locked in the election for him. Just charmed the hell out of me.
Bob Schieffer: Mrs. Heinz-Kerry, are you a string woman?
Teresa Heinz-Kerry: No, I’m a fraid knot.
Bob Schieffer: Mrs. Heinz-Kerry, are you a string woman?
Teresa Heinz-Kerry: No, I’m a frayed knot.
Kerry was born rich, with relatives who had even more money. Now he’s married to a woman who married extremely well the first time around and who as a result has more money than he does.
Kerry and Bush are both ‘Bonesmen’ and the Times had even had a graph of their overlapping family histories. Bush and Kerry are distant cousins.
This is not a vote for Jacob Levy; I find them all unbearable, Volokh included.
test
Just one more thing about Bob Schieffer, the one whose animus against Bush was so blatant that Mr. Levy (posting above) believes that Schieffer ought never to moderate a presidential debate again:
Bob Schieffer is not merely a friend of Bush’s. His brother Tom was, with Bush, a co-owner of the Texas Rangers baseball franchise. Moreover, Tom Schieffer is now the U.S. ambassador to Australia, and was appointed to that post by Bush.
To expand on Seth Edenbaum’s point, above: Republicans mock Kerry because he married into all that money, which is somehow unfair. Theresa’s money, of course, was inherited from her husband, Republican Senator John Heinz, who in turn inherited it from his own family. Did any Republican ever mock John Heinz’s inherited wealth, which is the same damn money that neither of them earned themselves? I don’t think so.
I think Kerry’s answer was brilliant, and TOTALLY trumped Bush’s. Why? When asked about “strong women” Bush chose his wife. Kerry chose his mother.
I think Kerry sewed up the votes of MANY undecided women, right there, in one answer.
I might explain. When I was a young single asshole (as opposed to the old married asshole I am now), the focus of my life was gaming the “dating” system for my own hedonistic gain. I had several platonic female friends who were very sharp in gaming the system from the other side, to secure the “perfect” man. We respected each other and compared notes and I learned a lot.
One of the things I learned is that an important question savvy single women ask a prospective mate is: “How would you describe your relationship with your mother?” It’s a very important question and the answer supposedly reveals a lot about man’s attitude towards and respect for women, and his comfort with and ability to maintain loving, close, personal relationships. From what I’ve been told, a woman can quickly “out” a closeted misogynist, nebbishy mama’s boy, or various other afflictions, based on his level of comfort in answering this.
Just as Kerry aimed his Swift Boat directly into fire, he aimed his answer directly at the archetypal strong woman in his life, the woman that has the single greatest influence on any mammal’s life, the one who really defines for most men the ideal of what women are all about: his mom. He went above and beyond the call of duty. Award the man a Silver Star for that answer.
It’s even more ironic (and telling!), since Bush’s mom is most definitely a strong woman— well-known and admired by many— who had a huge influence on him and would have been an excellent political choice as an answer. She’s also the person in the family that he resembles most: her nasty and vindictive streak is legendary. Regardless of whether Bush chose not to answer “Barbara Peirce Bush” out of political cowardice, emotional cowardice, neglect, or stupidity, he loses.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review