I’ve put off this promised update because up until today, it seemed as if there was nothing to add. The Human Rights Watch/US State Department figures of 300,000 murders in the period 1988-2003, the majority of which occurred during 1988-91, seems to be settled. However, Johann Hari has published an article in today’s Independent which seems to be working on a much higher figure for the other crucial number I was looking for; the likely number of deaths in 2003 if the war had not taken place. Sourced to the Human Rights Centre in Kadhimaya, via the Iraqi Prospects Organisation (a UK-based Iraqi exiles organisation), the claim is that analysis of the Ba’ath Party archives reveals that there would have been 70,000 killings if the war had not taken place.
Update, below fold
My instinct is that I don’t believe this number, and I’d certainly like to see something closer to a primary source. I don’t see how the kind of work that the Kadhimaya HRC has been carrying out (mainly providing Iraqis with the bad news about what happened to relatives of theirs who had been disappeared) could have provided this sort of information.
Also, the number 70,000 is too big. It would be substantially more than the number of killings in the Shia revolt of 1991, and equal to almost a quarter of the entire 1988-2003 death toll. As recently as January (in an article entitled “War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention : I reiterate my remarks of last year about “squatters on the moral high ground”), Human Rights Watch reiterated their view that there was no “ongoing or imminent” mass slaughter in Iraq; they certainly would have regarded 70,000 killings as a mass slaughter. So if this 70,000 number is on the level, it’s brand new information, and it’s very important indeed.
Once more, I’d be very grateful for any help from readers on this one; in particular, the Kadhimaya HRC doesn’t have a website and the Iraqi Prospects Organisation has a Flash interface which my computer doesn’t like, so I haven’t been able to chase up primary sources as efficiently as I’d like.
Update Thanks very much to a reader who I’ll name as soon as he confirms it’s OK for me to do so. With his help and some correspondence of my own with the IPO, I’ve established to my own satisfaction that a) the HRC is a credible organisation using sound methodology and b) that their work is at a very preliminary stage indeed (to be honest, I have no idea why I happily assumed that a skeleton staff had managed to computerise ten million records in a year). I agreed with IPO that the sensible thing to do is not to publicise (and hence risk politicising) the HRC’s work in this area at this early stage. So for the time being, I’ll be sticking with the 300K Human Rights Watch number, but remaining aware that a much higher number is out there.
I asked Hari for further information on Wednesday morning, but I haven’t had a response yet. I’ll let you know when I do.
What actually is the web address for the Iraqi Prospects Organisation? I couldn’t find it on google or A9.
www.iprospect.org.uk
“Iraqi exiles”?
Have we learned nothing? Exile groups obligingly provided the info that justified the invasion. Anyone remember that data?
I think it’s pretty unfair to tar all Iraqi exile groups with the brush of the Chalabi gang. AFAICT, the IPO is made up of about five or six young Iraqi students living in the UK. That’s light years away from the mob of chancers and fraudsters that the US took under their wing.
I also contacted the group to ask if there was any further information available. I’ll keep you posted. It certainly is an eye-opener if true. I wonder if it is somehow related to war planning?
As much as I’d like to believe it did play a role in war planning — being a proponent of liberal interventions — I think the 70,000 figure would surprise Wolfowitz as much as Daniel.
I recall that in the ‘98—‘02 time frame there were a lot of claims being made about deaths in Iraq owing to insufficient food and medicine as a result of the sanctions and the (inefficient and corruptly administered?) Oil for Food program.
I realize that this isn’t what’s being talked about here, but is there any good information on whether things are better now apropos food and supplies than then, and whether it makes a difference?
It seems tricky to me to extrapolate a regime’s direct kill-rate based on past behavior because that depends on hard to predict political factors - but estimating the number of deaths averted through open trade in food & supplies and equitable distribution of the same seems less difficult to me.
My personal guess is that absent naked rebellion the Hussein regime killed far more people through deliberate corruption and neglect than through more direct actions. I also think this is probably the case in North Korea.
dsquared: admitted, but I think the designations “Iraqi,” and “exile” say an awful lot about any organization’s position, perspective, and aims (even now).
Cuban exiles, anyone?
Also, there is a market for scary stories about Saddam. One could even make a career out of it.
So, 70,000? Now? Right. And rape rooms, and Salman Pak, and baby incubators, and people-shredders and, um, what’s that other thing?
Oh yeah: weapons of mass destruction
Heard any scary stories about the Templars?
I must admit that my default postion is to be suspicious of all exile groups, but the small amount of checking I’ve been able to do puts IPO in the clear. NB that Hari refers to them as having had “their families gassed”, which if he means it literally would suggest that they’re of Kurdish extraction & thus unlikely to be connected with the Chalabis.
By the way, while I’m in Percy Pedantic mood, “rape rooms” doesn’t belong on your list above; unlike the other scare stories, there really were rape rooms in Saddam’s Iraq.
Daniel,
Back when I first read your position on the Iraq war — you generally supported it but thought it would be something that Bush would thoroughly mishandle and so you favored putting it off — I thought it was pretty nonsensical. I thought, why exactly would Bush bungle it?
I have to say, its been making more and more sense every day since the war had ended. In fact, it seems oddly prescient now…
It seems tricky to me to extrapolate a regime’s direct kill-rate based on past behavior because that depends on hard to predict political factors - but estimating the number of deaths averted through open trade in food & supplies and equitable distribution of the same seems less difficult to me.
It did not require a war to fix that. We could have relaxed the sanctions. The sanctions hit so-called “dual use” goods required for public health very hard. The US regarded just about everything more complex than a sack of rice as “dual use”.
I’m a Soviet historian and have done work on the Stalinist repressions. People always ask me how many people Stalin killed. It seems like an easy question to answer but it’s actually exceedingly difficult. We can say with considerable confidence that around a million were executed, but beyond that we get into things like callously creating the conditions of mass famine and not providing relief, or deporting large numbers of people many of whom die of typhus, or incarcerating people in concentration camps where many die of overwork and being underfed, etc. It becomes entirely a matter of judgement.
This is just to say, that I am 99.9% confident that the number 300,000 is arbitrary, and that when historians study this x years later, they will come up with different numbers depending on different assumptions and that they’ll view the existing guesses as comically oversimplified.
But while we’re at it, I’ll add my further ten cents that this focus on how many of one’s own citizens one has arbitrarily murdered is too narrow a focus. The Nuremberg trials did get one thing right: conspiracy to commit aggressive war is a crime against humanity. No matter what number you put together for murders by Stalin it doesn’t come remotely near to the 28 million Soviet citizens who died as a result of the aggressive war that Hitler waged, not to mention the millions and millions of other citizens killed as a result of his war, including millions of Germans.
This simply has to be put into the calculus of Saddam’s crimes, his two aggressive wars that led to millions of dead Iranians, Iraqis, and a smaller number of Kuwaitis and “coalition soldiers”.
I, by the way, also opposed the war because I have a healthy respect for the annihilation wars bring and don’t particularly favor waging wars for what the egregious Thomas Friedman called a “long shot” that it might start a domino effect of democratization.
I have long wondered about that number. But there is no way I believe that Saddam Hussein or even the Baath party was going to take a personal interest in killing 70000 people in 2003. When would they find the time to govern? Who would they get to kill that many people - even Nazi’s were having breakdowns over a few hundred machine gunned victims, thats why they went to Zyklon. That would have to indicate major military actions using artillery on towns, and they haven’t got away with that since we let the shi’ite revolution we encouraged get crushed.
That number is as high as “normal” estimates of the number of people we let Hussein kill with helicopters after GWI. That is a death rate as high as in the worst years of the Iran Iraq war that we encouraged and prolonged.
I would put money down that they are including all deaths due to sanctions and all instances of murder in Iraq, assuming they didn’t just pull a good “big lie” number out of their ass.
I have long wondered about that number. But there is no way I believe that Saddam Hussein or even the Baath party was going to take a personal interest in killing 70000 people in 2003. When would they find the time to govern? Who would they get to kill that many people - even Nazi’s were having breakdowns over a few hundred machine gunned victims, thats why they went to Zyklon. That would have to indicate major military actions using artillery on towns, and they haven’t got away with that since we let the shi’ite revolution we encouraged get crushed.
That number is as high as “normal” estimates of the number of people we let Hussein kill with helicopters after GWI. That is a death rate as high as in the worst years of the Iran Iraq war that we encouraged and prolonged.
I would put money down that they are including all deaths due to sanctions and all instances of murder in Iraq, assuming they didn’t just pull a good “big lie” number out of their ass.
I have long wondered about that number. But there is no way I believe that Saddam Hussein or even the Baath party was going to take a personal interest in killing 70000 people in 2003. When would they find the time to govern? Who would they get to kill that many people - even Nazi’s were having breakdowns over a few hundred machine gunned victims, thats why they went to Zyklon. That would have to indicate major military actions using artillery on towns, and they haven’t got away with that since we let the shi’ite revolution we encouraged get crushed.
That number is as high as “normal” estimates of the number of people we let Hussein kill with helicopters after GWI. That is a death rate as high as in the worst years of the Iran Iraq war that we encouraged and prolonged.
I would put money down that they are including all deaths due to sanctions and all instances of murder in Iraq, assuming they didn’t just pull a good “big lie” number out of their ass.
Damn, I didn’t think any of them posted. Sorry.
A simple question which I hope someone more educated then I am can answer:
I think many of us would agree that Saddam’s regime had to be brought to an end somehow, but that is of course the question: How? Putting blinders on for a second, assuming that Saddam’s regime really was our most pressing global humanitarian concern, how would anyone here propose ousting him in hindsight? Or, assuming that war was a neccessity, how we could have waged the war differently so as to have avoided this disaster?
Is it possible to tamper with a nation to good ends? Is it ever possible to avoid Vietnams, or Israels, or Chiles, or Afghanistans (and so on…)
A fair start to ousting a dictator militarily is to tell the world and the oppressed that that is the purpose up front. People might then be better disposed to your actions.
Who’s going to complain about being liberated if that is truly and transparently what is happening?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review