Sometimes quotes take on a life of their own. They become famous and get attributed to someone without anyone citing a traceable origin. I ran into such a problem about five years ago when I wanted to use a quote by Herbert Simon in an article. The quote was this:
What information consumes is rather obvious: it consumes the attention of its recipients. Hence a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention, and a need to allocate that attention efficiently among the overabundance of information sources that might consume it.
I remember doing all sorts of searches online to figure out the exact source of that quote. But others using those lines either cited no source or pointed to a piece by Hal Varian in Scientific American as the source of the quote. I checked out that article, but there was no citation. What to do? I ended up contacting Hal Varian directly for the source and he very kindly provided a pointer to it (p.40.).
I was reminded of this today when I saw a message on a mailing list wondering about the source of the quote “The future is already here; it’s just unevenly distributed.”. It is often cited and attributed to William Gibson, but without an exact reference anywhere. A blogger cites an issue of The Economist, but I can’t track the quote down in the archives of The Economist. In fact, The Economist didn’t even seem to have an issue published on the date cited. Maybe a blogger intern isn’t such a crazy idea after all.
I looked up the quote using Amazon’s “search inside” feature. The one instance in which there is a source (page 15 of this book) the author cites personal communication in November 1999.
Maybe Brad DeLong can help.:) (see the last paragraph in that piece)
I once had to find the source of De Gaulle’s famous assertion that it is impossible to govern a country that makes ## cheeses. Googling the crack disclosed innumerable references in French, English, and other languages, which revealed wide variation in the exact form of the quote and, especially, the number of cheeses. The counts ranged from a low of 246 to a high of 700,
I always liked this site for trying to figure out who said something like this:
If a man is not a socialist by the time he is 20, he has no heart. If he is not a conservative by the time he is 40, he has no brain.
There’s more attempted provenances.
I got it from Bruce Sterling…
http://cyberdash.com/node/view/154 says:
“In his 2002 Inventing the Future, Tim O’Reilly quotes William Gibson: “The future is here. It’s just not evenly distributed yet.” That’s the first time I read it, and I’ve liked it so much that I used it in the header of this site.
“However, I’ve been wondering for quite a while where—and in what context—it was first used. Try Google, and you’ll find plenty of returns, as well as some variations which give it the feel of something that’s been passed on for quite some time. It’s clear that many people are using it without knowing the citation.
“Searching a large database of print texts with Amazon’s new text search reveals Ukens’ What Smart Trainers Know reference that it is from a Gibson personal communication in November 1999. Meanwhile, a 2001 alt.cyberpunk thread says that it’s from a radio show; unfortunately, linkrot prevents checking the primary source. But even more confusing is a 2000 alt.folklore.computers post attributing variations of the phrase to Bruce Sterling as early as 1993.
“Is it possible that Sterling should get some of the credit, or is it all Gibson? And if so, what is the earliest known usage?”
On the Shoulders of Giants …
LRB & NYT on André Bernard’s ‘Madame Bovary, c’est moi’:
“Kurt Vonnegut’s reply when asked where he got his characters from: ‘Cincinnati,’ he said.”
The above quote was Harlan Ellison, his ideas, and ‘Schenectedy’. Both reviewers took the same hook (line & sinker) and ran with it; what bemused was that Bernard joins the ranks of those putting others’ words in Vonnegut’s mouth.
Saw the same question (likely on the same list) and had the same response: Amazon’s inside the book. I wonder how many people now consider this a vital part of their search repertoire? I bet Amazon’s logs show an interesting spike on that particular phrase.
(It makes fairly short work of your earlier question, BTW.)
OTSOG: I will also note (for d^2’s amusement) that author Robert K. Merton (tracking the aphorism back to Bernard[!] of Chartres) therein cites son Bob (C.), whose subsequent work has now been extended to valuation of credit derivatives …
Trival addition:
The most frequently cited bit of Dostoevsky’s writing is, “If God does not exist, everything is permitted.”
Dostoevsky never wrote this. Rather, Jean Paul Sartre attributed these words to Dostoevsky and others have presumed that Sartre was quoting Dostoevsky (when he wasn’t).
A quick search of the online Brothers Karamazov found this:
‘But what will become of men then?’ I asked him, ‘without God and immortal life? All things are lawful then, they can do what they like?’
At least a close cousin of the quote Sartre attributed to Dostoevsky.
From an Interview I did with Gibson for the London Sunday Express, my copy dated 29 March 2000. He said: “We’ve lost our sense of the future as something up ahead up past the windscreen. The future is already here and it is very unevenly distributed and it arrives in bits and pieces constantly. Most readers must realise to some extent today that we?re not likely to get to a point where it simply is the future. that’s why it’s impossible to write science fiction in the old sense. There is no arrival point.”
Thanks, Andrew. On LexisNexis I found an April 2, 2000 article that has the same quote. It’s curious that the dates are different.
I was the guy who started the hunt for the William Gibson quote.
“As I’ve said many times, the future is already here. It’s just not very evenly distributed.”
There is a lot of misleading information. It is Not in his Neuromancer, altho a lot of folks think it is. And Google is filled with folks quoting Gibson as saying this, but without attribution.
The hunt for the quote is partially over.
Ren Reynolds and Ellen Pozzi both pointed me to an NPR “Talk of The Town” US radio) broadcast in which William Gibson uttered the magic sentence.
I have downloaded and listened to the show (which also has 2 other SF people on it).
This is hard. This exists. It is citable.
However, note the “As I’ve said many times,…” which means there should be earlier citations.
Although I’ve stopped looking, here’s the coordinates as supplied by Ren Reynolds:
NPR Talk of the Nation
30 November 1999
Timecode: 11min 55sec
Link: discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1067220
I found a different URL, from Ellen Pozzi’s info:
www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.php?prgld=5&prgDate=30-Nov-1999
Thanks to all those on the AOIR and CITS list who contributed to the treasure hunt, even to those who insisted on the false Economist leads. (Economist was just attributing to Gibson himself, without interviewing WG or having an article by him).
If you like this sort of sleuthing, I urge you to read sociologist Robert Merton’s wonderful book, On the Shoulders of Giants (a Shandian romp).
‘….At least a close cousin of the quote Sartre attributed to Dostoevsky.’
If I write a story where character A says “God Exists” and character B says “God does not Exist” does this mean that both statements are attributable as statements made by me?
If I write a story where character A says “God Exists” and character B says “God does not Exist” does this mean that both statements are attributable as statements made by me?
In the case of Dostoevsky, so far as I know, the evidence (internal and external) clearly points to his being on the side of the character who fearfully predicts that the loss of faith in God will result in moral anarchy. So I’d argue that “Dostoevsky says…” is acceptable shorthand.
Just to wrap this small question: my copy is dated when I wrote, and filed, the interview. Google presumably has the publicaiton date. Someone must have typed or scanned it in, becasue the Express was not, I think, on the web then.
I have often seen the quote attributed to Keynes, “the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” But I have not found any specific primary citation — to, say, a specific book or article of Keynes, a lecture or letter … whatever. I have begun to suspect it is apocryphal, although it is such a frequently useful quote it deserves an honest sourcing.
Can anybody help?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review