UPDATE: Apparently it’s a dud. In fact, John Quiggin defused it last month. Well, that’s a bit silly not to read my very own weblog. (I knew it was a bit suspicious, what with it being good news and all. What a world, what a world.)
I’ll tuck what now looks to be nonsense under the fold, for the curious. Comments are quite interesting below. And Tim Lambert has an interesting post up in response to the general question. Turns out this is a newer model than Quiggin discussed before.
This seems interesting and potentially quite important. But I know nothing about this stuff. That’s what comment boxes are for. Excerpt:
That discovery hit me like a bombshell, and I suspect it is having the same effect on many others. Suddenly the hockey stick, the poster-child of the global warming community, turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics. How could it happen? What is going on?
I reemphasize my lack of a hockey stick to grind. Really, I’m dead ignorant. (When Michael Bérubé does his hockeyblogging thing my eyes glaze over. And I never really was much good at math.) I would be pleased if it turns out the world isn’t boiling as soon as we feared, because I like things the way they are. (Link via Kikuchiyo.)
[UPDATE: Bérubé doesn’t blog about global warming. Just hockey. Don’t want to actually send anyone looking for stuff that’s not there. Just a joke.]
There was a big controversy over this stuff a few months ago. The upshot of all of it, as best I could tell back then was that McIntyre and McKitrick had very little idea what they were talking about.
The same McKitrik who doesn’t know the difference between radians and degress?
http://www.crookedtimber.org/archives/002392.html
Holbo, I think you’ve kind of grossly failed to do due diligence on this one.
If global warming were based solely on the “hockey stick” graph then perhaps global warming would be in for a serious rethink. However, it is not. Check out Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for a more thorough backgrounder on the global warming data. To be sure, the IPCC use the hockey stick graph on their summary page (it certainly looks impressive, until one considers the confidence intervals in the historical data (estimated by using tree growth rings, ice deposition, etc…)). However the “hockey stick” graph isn’t the only data which shows the same trend—look at this data based on maritime measurements, reported by a different group.
Expect all the global warming naysayers to leap on this one as proof that global warming is a hoax. Except it isn’t.
Perhaps Mann et al. (1998) has serious flaws. If so, then McIntyre and McKitrick haven’t done anyone any favors by not having more recent work published in a peer reviewed journal (whether or not Nature decided not to publish it). Furthermore, by focusinging so much on McIntyre and McKitrick’s work, Muller in his overview does us a disservice by not allowing Mann and colleagues a chance to respond. Indeed, it seems that Muller is all to happy for the hockey stick to go away.
Take this with a (hefty) grain of salt.
Naw, I just got you guys to do it for me. And now I know. Sorry for wasting everyone’s time. (Must have clean missed Quiggin’s post first time out. Bit silly, I admit.) I’ll do an update to avoid wasting other folks time. I was just clicking around and thought maybe I’d heard some good news. Ah, well.
My hunch is that Rich Muller has been taken in. McKitrick looks like a loon to me. Elsewhere, he writes:
“The catch does not involve a novel, contentious or obscure theory; it involves an old, standard, well-known definition from introductory thermodynamics. Indeed it seems to have been overlooked precisely because it is so elementary. The main problem in the debate over what the Global Temperature is doing is that there is no such thing as a Global Temperature. Temperature is a continuous field, not a scalar, and there is no physics to guide reducing this field to a scalar, by averaging or any other method. Consequently the common practice of climate measurement is an ad hoc approximation of a non-existent quantity.”
This argument proves that nothing bigger than a single molecule has a temperature…
The same McIntyre and McKitrick who discovered all kind of flaws in global warming charts because they “exported the original raw data to Excel but somehow exported 159 columns of data into a 112-column spreadsheet”?
OK, here is my post on Muller. Even if we discount all of McKitrick’s previous problems, it still looks like they are wrong about this one as well.
John: You never should have explained. I had just assumed you were joking…
Your links led me to read Michael Crichton’s
diatribe against environmentalism and he (or his sources) seem to be taking a cue from the Republican strategists: to attack your opponent’s strongest points. There’s definitely been some dubious science done on behalf of environmentalism, but Crichton is claiming that two triumphs of the enviromental movement with absolutely solid science behind them are suspect: namely, he claims that DDT didn’t kill birds of prey, and that second-hand smoke doesn’t cause cancer. It makes me wonder whether there’s any overlap in the strategists behind the Republican and the anti-environmentalist campaigns.
the only people with long(enough)term research to be credible at all seem to be the aforementioned IPCC. good stuff, if depressing. at least the russians are on board Kyoto now, so hopefully there will be enough of an impact that i can argue that things were much worse in my day….
I think it’s safe to say that any global warming skeptic who doesn’t address the question “Why are the glaciers melting?” is a hack.
Alas, Walt, I am too honest. It is my nature. This thread has been a very successful lazyweb experience for me. (Although admittedly I was a bit lazy to start it.)
It’s depressing that this wound up in something related to MIT.
Tech Central Station, I can see. But MIT Technology Review? That’s just sad.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review