Today is the 200th anniversary of Immanuel Kant’s death , a day that shouldn’t pass unremarked on a site whose title is drawn from his writings. For comment elsewhere see Normblog and The Virtual Stoa (where Chris Brooke has assembled some of Kant’s choicest footnotes).
man, I feel like such a dork. I’m teaching a class on the Critique of Pure Reason, for Pete’s sake!! I should have mentioned this in class today…..
My girlfriend, who is currently in Germany, said that they are announcing the anniversary on some of the popular music radio channels.
Joschka Fischer was in Kalingrad today, opening a consulate and visiting Kant’s grave. He gave a brief interview on his appreciation of Kant here: http://www.dw-world.de/english/0,3367,1441_A_1111992,00.html. Interesting stuff.
I can’t see his name without adding “. . . was a real piss-ant”.
sigh
Speaking of zoological oddities, it’s Darwin’s birthday.
in my time zone, at least
It should not be Kant’s birthday today, unless we are willing to make it a universal rule that everyone will have their birthday today.
The only philosophy book I’ve ever read is “Mindware” by Andy Clark. I read the entirety of “Eureka! : What Archimedes Really Meant and 80 Other Key Ideas Explained by Michael Macrone”, and some other book I can’t remember now. In other words, I know nothing about the context of Kant’s work, but from the generic descriptions I’ve heard about various philosophers (“He questioned blah, and synthesized blah with blah, in a quest for the nature of blah”), he sounds like the most interesting. Is there anything at all by Kant that the layman could begin to comprehend? Is there one Kant book in particular?
Is there anything at all by Kant that the layman could begin to comprehend? Is there one Kant book in particular?
It’s probably fair to say that none of Kant’s major works lend themselves to individual self-study (which is somewhat ironic given Kant’s views on the nature of philosophical knowledge). But some of his shorter essays are comprehensible and very much worth reading in their own right. Try “What is Enlightment?” and “Perpetual Peace”.
While we’re on the subject of lucid shorter works by philosophers famous for obscure long works, let me push this piece by Hegel (it has nothing to do with Marxism; that’s just the most convenient web source):
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/se/abstract.htm
Immanuel Kant?
You missed his middle initial. It was “B”. For “Bloviator.”
Although others might come up with other translations. Like those for his full middle name—Bullescheiss.
Oops, typo: that should be “What is Enlightenment?”
“Is there anything at all by Kant that the layman could begin to comprehend? Is there one Kant book in particular?”
Kant’s larger works are all pretty tough going.
“Kant”, by Roger Scruton, is a lively introduction. Reading it put me in a trance.
Is there a greater German than Kant? He is one of the few in history that Germany can be proud of.
An age that cant do Kant has lost major marbles, and is either pragmatist (Dewey’s “I gave up on Hegel) or, dribble, positivitically too far gone to do philosophy.
E.O. Wilson wants to declare war on Kant in the twenty first century (seriously). Do you agree? Be careful how you answer.
Kant can be resurrected from one paragraph from his short essay on history, cf. the link given
Thanks for using the Nietzsche reference. :-)
I once took one of those silly online quiizzes that’s intended to assess how the test taker jives with a selection of philosophers. (That my Sartre score was double digits rasies questions about its accuracy.) My Kant score was 100%. Well, that piques my curiosity. I’ll have to do a little reading to see if the quiz was even remotely correct.
Yo Fred!
Beethoven
Brahms
Strauss (any of several)
Mozart
Bach (several)
Haydn
Handel
Mendehlssohn
Schumann
Schubert
Einstein
Gauss
Planck
Roentgen
Goethe
Schiller
Nietzsche
Hegel
Goedel
Kleist
Schlegel (several)
Marx
Engels
Schopenhauer
Rilke
Heine
Kafka
Luther
Böll
Celan
Grass
Brecht
Mann
Not sure that any of them are greater than Kant, but that’s almost three dozen from German history that any nation would be proud of. Just off the top of my head, and limited to people immediately recognizable by a single name. Given first and last names, the list would grow very long indeed. A politician from the Austrian provinces (Californians take note) does not constitute the whole of German history.
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals is notably harder that What is E or Perpetual Peace, but it’s a fair bit more managable than the big three. Someone who’s intrepid and has a bit of experience with philosophical background could do it on their own, I imagine. It’s about 70 pages. The Hackett edition also contains another fun essay, “On the old saw, that may be true in theory but it won’t work in practice.” THis book will also introduce the reader to one of Kant’s more famous ideas, the categorical imperative.
I have embarked on an in-depth study of Kant. It started with Rawls, and some thinking about formalism and intuitionism in TOJ. Have spent about a week reading secondary material, with good aid from S Palmquist’s site. I am thankful you alerted me to his birthday, which made for a nice point for starting to read the original works.
Having studied several of the ethical works before, I have started on Judgement, plan to work backwards (sideways, whatever, as I come across a term like real or idea, I will research it).
I didn’t find Practical Reason all that difficult to read, although the subtlety of the ideas needs a lot of work. I enjoy reading Kant. There is a joy in the man, a subtle humour and wit, a pleasure of careful craftmanship. We have even yet to realize how great, and how good, Immanual Kant was as a man and philosopher.
And I want to thank Doug for his list. And thank the Germans for giving us more than their fair share of geniuses.
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals is notably harder that What is E or Perpetual Peace, but it’s a fair bit more managable than the big three. Someone who’s intrepid and has a bit of experience with philosophical background could do it on their own, I imagine.
I don’t think it’s that difficult of a read. It takes some time and concentration, but no real philosophy background to understand. I’m sure there are nuances and minor points I missed when I read it due to my lack of context, but I enjoyed it and understood all the major points.
Actually, the truly amazing thing is Kant’s lack of influence on the 20th century. The intellectual mainstream hasn’t caught up to him yet.
If Bertrand Russell or G.E. Moore had understood the first Critique, Anglo-American Analytic Philosophy as we know it would have never begun.
Kant solved the mind/body problem by noting that the world is mental. Einstein understood that, but did Stephan Jay Gould? Does Daniel Dennett? Does Richard Rorty?
These supposed intellectual giants are still working in a pre-Kantian, that is a Cartesian, framework. And this stuff does trickle down. Your typical scientist is also working in a Cartesian framework.
Kant opened the door to a post-metaphysical understanding of the world. Heidegger entered that door. So did Whitehead. So did Aurobindo. But mainstream academia still doesn’t get Kant.
I thought the “crooked timber” quote was from Isaiah Berlin. I’ve seen it attributed to Kant elsewhere, but I assumed it was spurious.
If it’s from Kant, which work was it from?
If it’s from Kant, which work was it from?
20 minutes ago I had no idea and I don’t really know any German, but thanks to the magic of Google, it’s from the essay in the Berlinische Monatsschrift (November 1784, S. 385-411) (The celebrated “Idea to a general history with world-civil intention”), which says:
[A]us so krummem Holze, als woraus der Mensch gemacht ist, kann nichts ganz Gerades gezimmert werden.
[F}rom so bent wood, when from which humans are made, can nothing completely straight are gezimmert.
How true that is, how very true.
(Translations with a little help from the fish)
InterWebNet, I heart u!
Ummm….
Including Einstien on the list of notable Germans may be technically acruate, but is it really FAIR? A coworker of mine is the daughter of a Jewish refugee from Austria who won a Nobel a few years back for his work on the brain. My coworker related how angry her father got when he was contacted by reporters from Austrian newpapers wanting to write stories about the “Austrian” Nobel prize winner. He told them on no uncertain terms that he was an American, not an Austrian - if Austria didn’t want him then, it couldn’t claim him now.
I have not read enough of Einstien’s life to know how he felt about this, but I suggest that nations should be equitably estopped from claiming credit for the achievements of those they rejected.
Leibniz should be on that list, man. Leibniz!
I have not read enough of Einstien’s life to know how he felt about this
There’s a famous quote from him (I remember reading it years ago in Einstein for Beginners) that goes, “If relativity is proved right the Germans will call me a German, the Swiss call me a Swiss citizen, and the French will call me a great scientist. If relativity is proved wrong the French will call me a Swiss, the Swiss will call me a German, and the Germans will call me a Jew.”
200 years … and still a virgin
To people who were asking for a short, readable introduction to Kant’s philosophy, I recommend Kant’s own “Prolegomena”.
Not sure that any of them are greater than Kant, but that’s almost three dozen from German history that any nation would be proud of.
Let’s not forget about Heidi Klum.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review