In a post yesterday about the later age at which academics get proper jobs nowadays, I focused on how this means that academics now have fewer children later (or none at all). But there’s another consequence of the way the job market and accreditation process have changed: pensions. Academics here in the UK still have a final salary pension scheme (which is nice). The scheme assumes to that to receive a full-value pension (50 per cent of final salary) you have made 40 years worth of contributions. I’ve even met some academics — appointed at around age 23 in the 1960s — who’ve managed this. But those who have entered the profession late (and burdened with debt) from the 1990s onwards, at age 30+ will never pay in their 40 years (given retirement at 65) and will therefore receive a lower income in their old age. I’ve assumed in this post that the system is the UK one, but obviously the point generalises beyond final-salary schemes. Those who earn proper salaries later (and are debt-ridden) will not contribute so much towards their pension — especially if they are trying to bring up a delayed young family! — and will suffer in their retirement.
This has been a very interesting thread. One factor you haven’t mentioned (I think) is the way in which the timescales of the academic job market squeeze out those who, for one reason or another, don’t finish university at 21 or 22. Take a really bright woman who didn’t go straight into university out of high school and then decides to work her way through in her mid-twenties. If she completes her BA at 26, she’s so far behind the curve that academia is - at best - an extremely risky option, particularly when child/family issues are factored in. Perhaps this is fair in some ways - after all, the job market is oversubscribed - but I can’t think of many other professions where three or four years in your early 20s are enough to almost completely eliminate the chance of pursuing your desired path for the next forty years.
Chris,
Isn’t this just a direct consequence of the fact they enter the workforce later? What I mean is that it’s not the final salary pension discriminates against them — it would be the same under a money purchase pension, wouldn’t it?
Matthew
Yes, that’s what I meant to say in the last 2 sentences.
My first thought is to wonder how long final-salary schemes will prevail in academia. My second is to wonder why you could not make adjustments to the indices for new demographic realities.
My first UK employer’s scheme worked on 1/57 of the final salary per year of service. If you managed 35 years, you’d have 35/57 or 61% of your full final salary. Not bad. Anything over 29 years and you’d be doing better on this scheme that the one in the FPP.
My second employer has a personal pension scheme with age-based voluntary overpayments, which, as a later-in-life starter, I really like the looks of. Why not have an option to buy extra years to top yourself up?
What the heck, doesn’t the government want us all to work to 70 now anyway?
(given retirement at 65)
Is that much of a ‘given’ in British academia? One of my presumptions about my return to academia, if and when it happens, is that they’ll probably carry me out in a box. Is that just an Oxbridge thing, and do normal universities try to enforce the statutory retirement age?
Yes, sorry I didn’t quite register that bit. But also, I think whas I’m trying to say is that simiarly academics can’t afford to buy as large houses as they once could because they can only meet mortgage repayments for 30 years, rather than 40 years - late starting is basically bad all around. I suppose in an ideal world people would get paid more to catch up…
Seems to me there’s a study waiting to be done on moral hazard and retirement planning: do late career starts lead to correspondingly riskier personal investment strategies? For instance, are new assistant professors in their mid-to-late 30s more likely than others to try to compensate for anticipated shortfalls in their institutional retirement plans by throwing money into, say, small-cap growth funds or other volatile investments?
“Normal” UK universities have been enforcing a statutory retirement age (and indeed encouraging early retirement) just like Oxbridge. However something I haven’t been following that closely appears to mean that retirement ages will no longer apply to Oxford from ‘04 or so - whether that’s for new contracts or for everyone, and for Oxford/bridge or everywhere, I don’t know. (Let’s face it: this message is an extended confession of ignorance.)
It’s not academia as such, but the cost of doing a doctorate. Having finished a doctorate at 26, then giving up academia at 28 meant starting at entry level in a new sector with no compensation for an advanced qualification. I am now resigned to working until I drop. Wonder how it affects graduate students in the US who tend, on average to complete longer? Do they have more pension perks as a teaching assistant?
Well, my retirement plan just kicked in last year, and will take 7% of my salary, match, invest, and immediately vest, as long as I work, full- or part-time, in my state. The problem? I am neither tenure-track nor permanently full-time, and I’m now over 40 (I finished the PhD at 37. OTOH, it seems that age and experience are becoming greater advantages in looking for tenure-track teaching jobs, because the institutions know their commitment is lessened by about 20 years!
Pensions need to be made more flexible. They should be more portable from job to job, and there is a need in all countries to eventually switch over to having something to do with the actual cash you’ve paid in, with no artificial cut off lines set at 40 years or 30 years or 20 years.
But even if all that was done, nothing would change the fact that it is a bad economic decision to take on a great deal of debt to get into a profession that pays poorly.
“Having finished a doctorate at 26, then giving up academia at 28 meant starting at entry level in a new sector with no compensation for an advanced qualification”
That’s an odd remark. If you’ve got an advanced degree in a valuable area then as soon as you get out you get swamped with cash. I’ve got friends just now getting out of medical school at age 31, and they are getting offers from $120,000 to $250,000.
The woman from whom I rent an apartment is still struggling to finish her Ph.d in systems engineering, but 2 years back when she ran out of money she took a year break and worked as an engineer and got paid $65,000 to do the work. Because she lives cheap the $65,000 was plenty to replenish her savings.
try persuading people outside academia of the transferability of the skills needed to complete a PhD in political philosophy…
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review