Gambier is a tiny town in rural Knox County, about 90 minutes northeast of Columbus. It’s where Kenyon College is and where my son cast his first vote. He tells me that there were only two machines for 1300 registered voters. There was an unprecedented turnout and one of the machines was frequently going out of service. Waits were up to 9 hours long.
Doubtlessly, needlessly long lines disenfranchised some Ohio voters. This is inexcusable. Does it help explain the apparent Bush victory? I doubt it.
What I saw on the street in Columbus was that the Republicans were better funded, better organized, and smarter about mobilizing their voters. I bet they also knew more about their people than the Democrats. The Democrats were polling, whereas the Republicans conducted a census. The Republicans were probably more successful in tailoring communications to individual voters and I’m sure they had a plan to get each one to the poll.
What will the Republicans do next with this machine? Rove and Norquist have been candid about plans for a political realignment. They are likely to have some success. Can the Democrats continue to block hard right judicial appointments? I also expect organized political pressure to bring the media into conformity.
Actually, I think this demonstrates a fundamental failure at realignment.
Rove simply ratcheted up his base another notch, which can be blocked by a corresponding increase on the other side of the coalition.
This election demonstrated zero capability of the Bushies to add new demographics to their coalition, even with terror and 9/11.
I don’t understand—the media is not already “in conformity?” What more can be done? Outlaw ‘Mother Jones’ & ‘The Nation?’
I don’t understand—the media is not already “in conformity?” What more can be done? Outlaw ‘Mother Jones’ & ‘The Nation?’
I don’t understand—the (MS)Media is not already “in conformity?”
And I assume they realize that residual opposition press (‘The Nation’ & ‘Village Voice’, etc. represent less of a threat ignored than they would outlawed.
I don’t understand—the (MS)Media is not already “in conformity?”
And I assume they realize that residual opposition press (‘The Nation’ & ‘Village Voice’, etc. represent less of a threat ignored than they would outlawed.
I don’t see why the long lines don’t help explain the Bush victory. I don’t think that polling place was the only one with long lines, and few people are willing to stand in line for many hours to vote (and some are unable to stand that long).
No doubt many other voters were discouraged by challenges. Over 130,000 filed provisional ballots, presumably mostly people the challengers thought would vote for Kerry. I think that converting significant numbers of Kerry votes from “normal” votes into provisional ballots, which can be treated as unreal, was part of the Republican PR strategy. In winning the media game, a supposed margin of more than 100,000 votes is far better than a margin of only a couple of thousand or even hundreds.
Any know how the process for finding out what happened last night will occur? Will it just be Kerry supporters fighting Bush supporters with empty rhetoric about who’s vote was suppressed?
Or will there be data, studies, and investigations?
The most interesting thing to me was the contrast between the exit poll and the outcome (I know, the exit poll wasn’t that bad in % points).
The question that raises to me is the influence of the exit poll on who votes. Do people look at the exit poll, and go ‘Oh my gosh, this is a close state, and the other guy is winning, let’s vote.’
I think that’s safe to assume. Or maybe Democrats would see a good poll and say, “Screw it - I’m not standing online if we’re already up 5 points.” I was following on CNN last night, and Bush’s campaign manager had an interesting point about how inaccurate exit polls are as a tool, and if an effect like this exists, how it may be better to just not use such a tool.
Patrick — I hope you are right that the Republican’s hoped for demographic realignment failed.
Kcindc — The reason I suggested that long lines would not explain the Bush victory is that I am not sure that the people who could not vote would have been more likely to vote for Kerry.
these are both important empirical questions.
The bad exit poll data is probably because people who voted Bush were ashamed and didn’t want to be polled or admit it.
The most reasonable answers for flawed exit poles are volume and location. The large increase in voters would skew flawed pole results. The tendency to take the majority of exit poll information in cities (largely Democrat areas) increases the error.
Actually, most of the provisional ballots filed in Ohio were simple and appropriate: people who had moved, but not filed change-of-address forms. At the precinct where I was posted, the pollworkers were as helpful as they could be in getting people to the correct locations. Where I was, most of the provisionals were fairly young, and most were male—people who’d just moved are more likely to be people who move a lot.
After the flurry of court decisions Monday, it ended up that more Democratic challengers were present in the polling places than Republican challengers (e.g., I had no counterpart). I’ve heard no confirmed reports of Republican challengers actually challenging anyone, and many reports of well-run efficient polling places with one or two extra partisan observers who were entirely polite to each other and everyone else present. (The Republicans were apparently checking names off of some sort of list, and the pollworkers at my site had heard that there were, after all, more Republican challengers in heavily minority precincts.)
The lines in many places were dreadful (Oberlin experienced the same kinds of problems as Kenyon; the lines became parties, complete with food and live music). Blame the county BoE’s not believing their own registration numbers—it’s incompetence, not malice. And, for all cases with which I am familiar (in hotly contested northeast Ohio), the polls did stay open as long as necessary for those who got there by 7:30 to vote.
Much as I mourn the result of the election here, I feel—after watching a small slice of it (one precinct all day up to and including the counting and packaging of the ballots) up close and after talking with those who were running the Democratic “voter protection” effort around here—like it was basically fairly conducted.
The weak link is our horrible pastiche of local election administrations. So much of the data on voter rolls is nonsense (people who have moved away, people with data entry errors, etc), and there’s no way to coordinate these lists and make them any better. After watching get-out-the-vote activists try to figure out BoE lists, after watching voters say, “Uh, you have my dead father here, but not me,” to the pollworkers, after thinking a little about how simple all these problems render certain types of fraud—-well, I wish we had national ID cards, or something, that would allow coordination. Make it simple, make it uniform, make it make sense.
Many voters don’t understand why they don’t need to show ID at the polls and would feel safer if they did. And I don’t think anyone can understand why registering in, say, a different state doesn’t automatically get you removed from your previous roll, or why the number of missed elections it takes to drop off the rolls varies so much from person to person, even on a single roll. Trust in the system would be higher (and, hopefully, unwarranted accusations of fraud would be rarer) if there were more consistency and more verifiability.
Hmm. regarding the level of information on individual voters, I am reminded of a certain database project that the infamous John Poindexter was working on. And now we have the start of what could become an enormouns list of prescreened airline passengers.
I’ll just let my chip implant determine my next vote from my brain waves and cast it remotely via WiFi.
Gotta go polish my tinfoil hat now.
Knox County went for Bush 63-37.
I worked for the Kerry campaign in Nevada over the weekend and through election day, and they had conducted a census and we did work successfully to get the targetted voters to the polls. In some types of districts (low income, highly mobile/transient) this can only be done with a large amount of human power to knock on doors. A better information system would have helped even here. I have a few ideas about this.
While we didn’t quite take Nevada blue, local Democrats in the targetted areas did win. More of that please.
I worked for the Kerry campaign in Nevada over the weekend and through election day, and they had conducted a census and we did work successfully to get the targetted voters to the polls. In some types of districts (low income, highly mobile/transient) this can only be done with a large amount of human power to knock on doors. A better information system would have helped even here. I have a few ideas about this.
While we didn’t quite take Nevada blue, local Democrats in the targetted areas did win. More of that please.
I can’t understand the planning here. 1300 voters, 2 machines? With an unreasonable two minute allowance per voter, each machine can handle 30 voters per hour. If the poles are open 14 hours, than one machine would accomadate 420 voters, at full capasity. Two machines would allow for 840 voters to cast their votes at the relentless pace of a 2 minute process. One could claim that the plan to have only two machines was a plan to not accomate the known number of registared voters.
Now how is it we plan to improve the math skills of this nation?
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review