Apparently. Not yet got confirmation from the OAS and Carter Centre that the ballot met standards of honesty and probity, but it looks like Chavez has come in with a pretty thumping majority; 58% of the vote is really rather good on the massive turnout reported.
Of course there is now a fairly substantial Catch-22 situation. Part of the reason why Chavez was able to win was that in recent months he’s been throwing around money like water on social programs. He was able to do this because oil was up above $40 a barrel, generating vast profits for the state oil company. A lot of the reason why oil prices were so high was that … there was significant uncertainty about supply from Venezuela because of the impending referendum. Now that some of the uncertainty has been resolved, oil futures have already started tumbling, meaning that it’s going to be that little bit more dfficult to deliver on these promises; if I were a Venezuelan, I wouldn’t be assuming that we were out of the woods yet.
Update: Carter Centre and Organisation of American States just more or less endorsed the votes; they didn’t find evidence of serious fraud and the results more or less match what the independent observers were seeing.
What, you don’t trust the CIA to do their bit to push oil prices up again?
How much are oil futures down compared to say Friday?
Oil Prices are going to climb higher and higher as time rolls by despite any temporary pull back. Only a real big economic slowdown in China will stop this and that only for a while. I don’t thinl Chavez need worry on that score.
Both Oil and Chavez were big issues on The Mclaughlin Group yesterday. Most of those ‘experts’ believe that oil will continue to climb. Wouldn’t it be to Venezuela’s advantage to lower the price of their oil much in the same way Chile dumped copper onto the world market a couple of years ago?
Taking the cash upfront—to put a cold phrase to chris marcum’s reasoned statement—might also help with US relations, if you assume the current regime will be in place on 21 January 2005.
To Matthew’s question, via CNN:
“At 10:25 a.m. ET, U.S. light crude oil for September fell 23 cents to $46.35 a barrel, down from an early peak of $46.91 a barrel which was the highest since the New York Mercantile Exchange launched oil futures 21 years ago. London Brent was down 8 cents at $43.80 a barrel.
Prices fell after results released by Venezuelan electoral authorities with 94 percent of the vote counted showed Chavez survived a referendum to recall him….Energy markets have been worried about disruptions to the country’s 2.6 million barrels per day (bpd) oil production if a disputed result sparked social unrest. Shipping sources had said shipments from Venezuela, the world’s fifth-largest crude exporter were running smoothly.”
http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/16/markets/oil.reut/index.htm
“…if I were a Venezuelan, I wouldn’t be assuming that we were out of the woods yet.”
Actually, now it starts to get really bad. Chavez represents the poor and repressed ethnicities. He won 2 elections and now a referendum by a huge majority. The wealthy elites failed in their coupe attempt 2 years ago (which the NYT called a victory for democracy) because Chavez’s supporters came out en masse on his behalf. So, the opposition tried the referendum route, hoping to use legal and extra-legal means to win the vote. But, the cheating on both sides probably balanced out (actually Chavez probably would have taken over 60% in a fair election).
So now the opposition realizes that they can’t win by legal means. No matter what they do the poor will vigilantly support Chavez, so he’s in power until he dies. Expect the shooting to start soon, accompanied by “strikes” (really lockouts) of the oil industries.
Chavez’ problem is that he should have built a coalition of the middle-class and poor. But he’s as divisive as Bush, appealing to one side while putting down the other. If he’d done enough to placate the middle class then there would be no popular opposition, just some unhappy military and business fatcats.
You know, cracking down on the media, and jailing opponents, might also have had something to do with the victory… Oh, well, he does at least serve to demonstrate that the right doesn’t have a monopoly on sucking up to thugs.
Brett: give over. If you’re trying to claim either that Chavez got sympathetic coverage from the Venezuelan media, or that the result of this election would have been different if only Carlos Melo was not in prison, you’re about as delusional as the “Si” campaign. Chavez is an authoritarian with plenty of imperfections. But the plain fact of the matter is that the poor people of his country want him to be President, the rich people don’t and that there are more poor ones than rich ones.
Everyone is completely eyes-open about Chavez, and in an ideal world the project of diverting oil revenues into education and housing would be carried out by someone less flawed - personally I’d nominate Gandalf - but to call him a “thug” is just wrong (quite apart from anything else, I thought that word had been reserved for Sadr). Neither Amnesty nor HRW have serious complaints about Venezuela; they don’t like the Supreme Court laws and they don’t think Chavez protects journalists enough from chavistas, but that’s really very small beer indeed.
“jailing opponents”
Are you talking about the coup plotters, Brett?
And if so, why shouldn’t they be in jail? They plotted to get rid of democracy in Venezuela - I’d call that high treason.
No, he’s repeating talking points, so he’s not speaking about anyone in particular. Chavez has also imprisoned some of his leftist opponents on what look to me like trumped-up firearms possession charges (though I note that neither AI nor HRW have apparently taken them on as prisoners of conscience), so there is a certain degree of truth in the charge of being an authoritarian strongman. But many fewer than, say, the Russians, Mexicans or (hate to say it) Israelis.
Actually, I’m more upset, in principle, over his elimination of the independent judiciary. That court packing scheme he carried off made FDR’s plans look tame.
You don’t do that sort of thing if you plan to remain within the law.
But, yeah, I’d buy that the cheating roughly canceled out, and Venezuelans have voluntarilly subjected themselves to what’s coming. A perfect example of Mencken’s definition: “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”
“The CIA apparently regards it as a foregone conclusion that Chavez will win his recall referendum on Sunday (note: I think it’s actually pretty close)”After every event the CIA does an internal evaluation/history (the one from Guatemala, ‘54 is a fascinating read) of what they got wrong. Any willingness to do so on your part?
(I swear I’m not trolling- I’m curious to hear what your train of thought was behind that statement)
Greg Palast has some interesting thoughts on the subject:
And what seems to have gotten our Veep’s knickers in a twist is not the price of oil, but who keeps the loot from the current band-busting spurt in prices. Chavez had his Congress pass another oil law, the “Law of Hydrocarbons,” which changes the split. Right now, the oil majors - like PhillipsConoco - keep 84% of the proceeds of the sale of Venezuela oil; the nation gets only 16%.
Chavez wanted to double his Treasury’s take to 30%. And for good reason. Landless, hungry peasants have, over decades, drifted into Caracas and other cities, building million-person ghettos of cardboard shacks and open sewers. Chavez promised to do something about that.
…
So began the Bush-Cheney campaign to “Floridate” the will of the Venezuela electorate. It didn’t matter that Chavez had twice won election. Winning most of the votes, said a White House spokesman, did not make Chavez’ government “legitimate.” Hmmm. Secret contracts were awarded by our Homeland Security spooks to steal official Venezuela voter lists. Cash passed discreetly from the US taxpayer, via the so-called ‘Endowment for Democracy,’ to the Chavez-haters running today’s “recall” election.
A brilliant campaign of placing stories about Chavez’ supposed unpopularity and “dictatorial” manner seized US news and op-ed pages, ranging from the San Francisco Chronicle to the New York Times.
“They plotted to get rid of democracy in Venezuela - I’d call that high treason”
Was it high treason when Chavez attempted a coup a few years ago, or are there all sorts of fascinating reasons why that was different? Chavez admirerers have no moral grounds to complain about coups.
You know, Ross, it sounds as if you think that a coup is a good thing if used against Chavez. Because, if the coup attempt that Chavez made (and for which he was punished) was such a bad thing, wasn’t the coup against Chavez (in connection with which the plotters got off scott-free) a bad thing, too?
Or, in your world, are up and down subjective things dependent on one’s political perspective?
Any willingness to do so on your part?
Yeh, sure. It was partly “pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will”; I wanted Chavez to win so much that I was scared of predicting it. But it was mainly the age old fault of believing in what you measure. Intellectually I knew that opinion polls were likely to be oversampling a) Caracas and b) the literate, and that Chavez’ base of support came from outside both those areas. But I couldn’t draw away enough from the poll numbers that I kept seeing, mainly in retrospect on antichavista websites.
I’d also note that while this is a convincing victory, it’s not a landslide for Chavez; given that the rich white minority in Vene is between 25 and 30% and turnout figures are being given at 95%, a lot of his core constituency must be pretty pissed off at him too.
“I wanted Chavez to win so much that I was scared of predicting it.”
Why? Do his “Bolivarian circles” and the fact that he himself once tried to overthrow the democracy you are now making him out to be a defender of not trouble you at all? Or is this yet another case of “can’t make an omelette …”, in which case, why your wrath against Allawi?
Chavez attempted a coup (and was thrown in jail) then won two elections and a referendum.
The anti-Chavez forces attempted a coup, then lost two elections and a referendum.
If attempting a coup means you no longer line up with the defenders of democracy, then that applies to both sides, right?
Do his “Bolivarian circles” and the fact that he himself once tried to overthrow the democracy you are now making him out to be a defender of not trouble you at all?
Yes, and I believe that I have said so in every single thing I have ever written on the subject of Chavez. But, it seemed obvious to me that first, nobody else was prepared to do a damn thing for the poor of Venezuela, who really did deserve a shot, and second, that the opposition to Chavez was composed of flaky oligarchs who really really ought not to have been given a chance at the economy. Meanwhile, for all the rhetoric about Chavez, it is very hard to come up with any actual specifics of human rights violations; the best that anyone seems to be able to do is that riot police in Venezuela have been guilty of brutality (riot police everywhere are always guilty of brutality) and that the firearms charges against Carlos Melo looked a bit weak.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review