This series of reports in the Guardian is incredibly worthwhile, not just as an insightful piece of reporting on crime in the UK, but as a general example of what goes wrong when you try to manage things “by the numbers”. In general, if business school taught me anything it’s that companies with no strategy process of their own end up being managed by their most junior budget analyst (because he’s the one who writes the report and therefore picks the ratios to concentrate on), and it appears that something similar goes on in the public sector. While we’re on the topic, a couple of other fun facts for UK criminology nerds:
1. A prize for the first confirmed sighting this week of a report on the Home Office crime figures which attempts to find an explanation for the “massive increase” in the murder rate in the UK without the author realising that all 215 of the murders attributed to Dr Harold Shipman over a fifteen year period were booked in the 2002/3 numbers because that’s when the total was finally established.
2. One of the big driving forces behind the misbegotten policing “reforms” detailed in the Guardian article above was an “epidemic” of street crime in last year’s figures. It was particularly noted at the time that thefts of mobile phones had gone through the roof …. oh dear. It appears that more than half of reported mobile phone thefts and up to 10% of the total reported street crime in London is the result of people claiming to have had their telephones stolen in order to claim on the insurance. It gets worse … there is a distinct suspicion that some of the less reputable mobile phone shops are encouraging people to do this, in order to get the insurance companies to unwittingly subsidise upgrades in an increasingly competitive phone market. I’d always wondered how the industry was going to finance the transition to 3G handsets …
Both of the anomalies above, by the way (as well as the fact that, after a few years’ campaign to improve reporting levels, it is now the case that domestic violence accounts for a quarter of the violent crime in England and Wales, much more than anywhere else), can be avoided by serious researchers by always using victimisation survey data wherever possible.
Yes, but….
If we’re going to object to centralised control of the Police, fine- but then we have to ditch centralised funding of the Police. Where I am now, I don’t have access to a decent stats library, but if the Police are in line with other supposedly ‘local’ services, than more than 80% of their funding comes from central government revenues. If central government pays the bills, then central government damn well ought to have a say in how the cash is spent.
If we’re going to have local control of the Police, as Davies might be advocating, then there will have to be root and branch reform of Police Authorities- which at the moment are not elected bodies, although Councillors are among their members, and which are pretty unforthcoming about their activities, even by the standards of British governing institutions. And there will also have to be local funding of the Police- ie all from Council Tax or similar.
Davies might be advocating ‘neither of the above’ but rather what you might call ‘institutional autonomy’- ie the Home Office- funded by general tax revenues- ponies up four fifths of the costs of the various local Police forces, but senior Police officers are free to make whatever decisions and manage in whatever way they see fit, and the Home Secretary must not dare to express public displeasure with a Chief Constable.
Now do we want this? Judicial independence is one thing, but complete independence of the Police? What if some local Force decides to run an abusive paramilitary style ‘reaction force’, on the lines of the French CRS or the ’70s UK Special Patrol Group? What if a local force gets totally out of hand, either slackly allowing crime to flourish, or practising thuggery and corruption, or both? If the Home Secretary’s job is to pay the bills and keep his mouth shut, and the Police Authority are the same old group of Councillor Bugginses and Local Worthies, who exerts any control over badly run or politically biased Police Forces? It may be hackneyed, but quis ipsos etc etc. And Davies doesn’t, so far as I remember, mention that the major influence on senior coppers is the Association of Chief Police Officers, which forced out John Alderson in 1981 for being too liberal on blacks, young people etc, but had a decided tolerance for the Old Testament views of James Anderton a few years later. Do we leave it to ACPO to decide who runs Forces, and how?
My take on the Armed Forces would be that senior officers are generally more intelligent, and certainly more knowledgeable in their field, than the politicians set over them. Who do you think is brighter, and who has seen more difficult situations: Geoff Hoon or General Mike Jackson? But I don’t see the Guardian asking for the Army to be set free of centralised political control, for the best of democratic reasons.
I’m not advocating anything except reading that article …
Probably a lot of this blog’s US readers will be trying to figure out why Dan Hardie thinks local control of the police is dangerous.
One of the extremely amusing differences between the US and Europe. Would you rather have corrupt, good-old-boy locally-owned police, or disinterested and unremovable nationally-owned police?
How about neither?
D-squared: I know you’re not advocating anything except reading the article. But the guy who wrote the article is advocating more than that, and as you may have noticed, you and he share the same surname.
>Probably a lot of this blog’s US readers will be trying to figure out why Dan Hardie thinks local control of the police is dangerous.
>Probably a lot of this blog’s US readers will be trying to figure out why Dan Hardie thinks local control of the police is dangerous.
Learn how to read. I am all in favour of local control of the police, as I said, if that is democratic. Control of the police by the Police Authorities, as currently constituted, would be about as democratic as the Florida recounts of 2000. There are elected councillors on the PAs, but they are appointed to the PAs by the local Party Leaders, and cannot be directly removed by the voters. There are also a large number of local Establishment figures, appointed by means which are never disclosed to the Lower Orders. There is no Freedom of Information Act in the UK, so we have no way of knowing what the PAs decide on as policy.
And the worst of all worlds would be what Davies (that’s Nick the Guardian hack, not D-Squared) seems to be, er, advocating: ie that the Chief Constables can do what the hell they like and the rest of us trust to their good instincts and have no say in how we are policed.
Yup, good plan.
>>and as you may have noticed, you and he share the same surname.
Historical note: I hadn’t noticed. I wondered why you were calling me “Davies”. I’ll get my coat.
Dan, no insult intended—it is just that a lot of the US readers of this blog have no idea how the British government works at a local level. The US, of course, has locally controlled police, but in most instances there is at least potentially some kind of democratic accountablity.
And probably most US readers would guess that Geoff Hoon is the late lead singer of Blind Melon . . .
While I agree that victimization surveys are generally to be preferred, I’m not sure that they’re the best instrument for measuring murder rates.
D^2, can I claim the murder prize? Thursday’s Sun on p.12 has, and I quote, “murder, manslaughter and killing of infants JUMPED by 18 per cent, from 891 to 1048”
Two columns later it has “And ministers insist the murder rate appears distorted through the inclusion of the 172 victims of” blah blah blah.
Ok..they didn’t not realise. But putting it way down after the bullet pointed “18% rise” and the phrase “insist” surely gets me half the prize?
Let’s see, we’ve got “Dan” commenting about an article by “Davies”, but neither of those individuals has a squared D in their name.
I get confused so easily!
Now all we need is for someone named Nick Hardy to show up.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review