It is hard to overestimate the damage that has been done, not only to the US occupation of Iraq but to the cause of democracy and civilisation as a whole by the exposure of torture and sexual humilation of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison, formerly used for the same purposes, though of course on a much more brutal and extensive scale, by Saddam Hussein1. If these pictures had been staged by the Al Qaeda propaganda department they could scarcely have been better selected to inflame Arab and Muslim opinion against the West, combining as they do the standard images of torture with scenes specially designed to show the determination of the West to humiliate Muslim men in every way possible.
Update 05/04. There is more on this, and on the symbolism of US occupiers living in Saddam’s palace over at Whiskey Bar, where Billmon notes a similar proposal by Hisham Melhem, a Lebanese journalist. See also Eccentricity
It goes without saying that those directly involved, or who knew what was going on and failed to act, should be prosecuted and punished to the full extent of the law. In addition, those in the chain of command whose lapses contributed to the commission of these crimes should be dismissed out of hand. It seems clear that this latter class must include nearly all those involved in organising the policy of detention without trial, and particularly those involved in the interrogation of prisoners - scenes like these could not occur if the general practices of the prison were not already violent and degrading2. But these steps, necessary as they are, will do little more than to prevent the further aggravation of the damage that would be done if these crimes were seen to be condoned in any way, or if those prosecuted are seen as merely disposable scapegoats (a view those in the immediate firing line are already pushing hard)
Only a response on a dramatic scale has any hope of significantly reducing the damage. My suggestion3 is that the Administration should immediately evacuate and demolish this awful place, and should announce that, before June 30, all those detained by the CPA will either be released or charged with a criminal offence, and, further, that anyone detained after that date will be brought before an Iraqi court. It might be useful to propose a memorial for those who died there and in similar places, though the design and construction should be left to an Iraqi governent.
Of course, this will mean releasing many people who are either insurgents themselves or have given aid and comfort to the insurgents. And, of course, the Iraqi court system is far from satisfactory. But the policy of detention has created far more insurgents than it has captured, as have the raids and searches associated with it. And if Iraqi judges are good enough to produce an arrest warrant for Muqtada al-Sadr, they’re good enough to deal with ordinary Iraqis caught up in military raids,
1 I say “of course”, but even the most charitably disposed commentators in the Arab/Muslim world are unlikely to concede so much. The most favorable view that Arabs and other Muslims are likely to hear is that the Americans are no different from Saddam, neither better nor worse.
2 Just after writing this, I came across this NYT report which seems to confirm it.
3 Not mine alone, I’m happy to say. As pointed out in the comments thread, Scorpio at Eccentricity made the same suggestion, a couple of days before me. Let’s hope this idea has also occurred to someone with the will and capacity to implement it.
We are no different from Saddam.
And we will have to pay repartaions for our invasion of Iraq, just like Saddam had to pay for Kuwait. And until America ceases all WMD activities, we should be put under a punishing embargo…and then invaded and have our dictator arrested!
This won’t happen to us…yet. But we are going down in history as one of the more shameful government structures, more and more akin to Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.
“We are no different from Saddam.”
Well speak for yourself, Elaine.
By the way, I think John’s idea is a good one. (I presume the Iraqis themselves would be for the demolishing.)
“This is Halliburton Time.”
Demolish the prison might be a start, signing on to the International Criminal court would be a better move.
The US attempts to destroy the ICC are going to be seen in the Arab world as sending a message to the US troops that they can do anything they choose.
Well said.
There’s only one thing I take issue with: your first sentence says it’s the “exposure of torture and sexual humilation of Iraqi prisoners” that did the damage to the cause of democracy. I think the esposure of these acts, if anything, is a sign of democracy actually working. In a dictatorship no news of such acts is ever splashed across news media, or open for debate in forums such as this one.
Granted, this distinction will, at this moment, be lost on an Iraqi citizen rightfully outraged by the hypocrisy of the occupying (oops, liberating) U.S. forces. Even if the freedom to be outraged and say/write/broadcast so is very important here. And this is a distinction that, in the case of the Nightline broadcast, or Hillary Clinton giving interviews in the Arab media appears lost on the local practitioners of free speech as well.
Of course it would be better if U.S. military leaders were above behaving like the military leaders of dictatorships. However, I would not underestimate the importance of the fact that they are being exposed in the media of their home country, and though the torture of a single person is much more than should have happened, decade upon decade filled with such torture has not yet passed - and these military leaders are being held accountable (we don’t know to what extent yet - and yes, there’s room for cynicism here) for what they’ve done.
Great, startling suggestion. It would have a real impact, both on the Muslim world and on the rest of the planet (which I thiink deserves a mention). I can readily imagine debates looming in Coalition parliaments resulting in them pulling their troops out. Then they will wash them off at the airport.
john (isbell) - if you’re referring to my comment, I’m not really sure how what I said is a suggestion… I would have classed it under opinion, describing things that I believe are and will be regardless of what I may take upon me to suggest. But here’s a suggestion anyway: I’d caution against conflating a government with the people it claims to govern. Think, for an example, of what percentage of people living in America are represented by Bush. The actual percentage of the applicable census figure is what I mean. It’s the debate of the people I’m trying to point out, which is messy, inaccurate and does not always have the effect those of us who believe know better than the humdrum masses of uneducated humanity would desire. And, sadly, the only way people appear not to want to shoot each other is if they’re allowed to make their mistaken interpretations. Again, see Eastern Europe for an example of this. By which I mean those countries, for the most part, which have just become part of the EU. (Sticking to what I know best, again.) Politicians have their own special discourse which is hard to track down… Here’s where the media comes in (ideally, anyway, and in all its various forms, right down to blogging.) I would not dismiss the importance the media played in bringing about social and political revolution in Eastern Europe in the late 1980s and early 1990s. I know people have grown cynical of this fact, but please recall the seige of Romanian television broadcast stations on Christmas Eve of 1989 as the crucial act that sealed the fate of a certain dictator. Yes, mess followed afterwards. You can’t save people (by which I mean the people, not the governments) the trouble of working it ouf for themselves - that was, to my mind, the hardest and most painful lesson of the communist experiment. Frankly, it can’t be dismissed as “not a good idea” or “yeah, that’ll have the desired effect on furthering the cause of democracy.” That sort of thing has often been said before and (to stick to what I know the most about) the people who said it not infrequently turned out to be the former dictators of Eastern European countries.
“In a dictatorship no news of such acts is ever splashed across news media”Not internally, not in a self-examining way, but as propaganda, yes, sure it is. To show the barbarity of the enemy, yes.
The treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraib may be shocking in the sense that it very strongly offends our sense of conscience, but it cannot be said to be shocking in the sense of surprising. It is inevitable that over the course of a prolonged occupation, there will be some egregious human rights violations, even if you believe — as I do — that the military personnel comprising this occupying force are for the most part about as well-trained and well-intentioned as any occupying force in history.
Bad apples — and, probably more relevantly, cases of group dynamics gone awry — are simply a fact of human nature. There is no point in pretending that these kinds of events are aberrational; what would be truly aberrational would be for no such events to occur.
(Indeed, as human rights violations go, this particular set of events seems to be on the less egregious side. While we have yet to learn the full scope of what occurred, it seems that the worst of what happened were that some prisoners were subjected to episodes of humiliation or false threats. Those acts should be strongly condemned, but they are some distance from the horrors of the Lubyanka. If what we know is the worst that happened, we should be thankful for that.)
Why is it important to keep this context in mind? Not to excuse any of the personnel involved, who — it is to be profoundly hoped — will meet justice. Rather, it is important to keep this context in mind when those who proposed and supported the occupation argue that these human rights violations were an unforeseeable obstacle to the success of an otherwise well-thought-out plan. The truth of the matter is that even if you think the very best of the American military and its personnel, you should reasonably have anticipated that at least some of these kinds of violations (or worse) would occur and come to light in the course of a long occupation, and it is no excuse to say that you had hoped that no such violations would occur.
I’ve been saying the same thing repeatedly all over the web as well as on my web log (4/29) — evacuate it, photograph the entire inside, raze it, and pave over the site where it stood.
Scorpio
Eccentricity
Thanks for pointing this out, Scorpio. I’ve added a link to the post.
It’s really sad for me to see that the world pays so much attention to specific incidences of “bad” and ignores so much “good.” I’m currently here at Abu Ghraib- I arrived as the unit responsible for the atrocities posted all over the news was on its way out, and the investigations were already far underway. It pains me to see the soldiers here, working hard, mostly reservists making less money here than they do at home, being judged by the actions of the “few.” Everyone is so quick to point the finger, scorn and criticize. The problem is that none of these same people are very quick to help. Write an essay that’s critical! But remember that your freedom to do it is protected by the MANY soldiers serving this great country that would never consider participating in acts such as those 60 Minutes II depicted. The MANY are embarrassed. The MANY are angry that their name is scarred by the actions of a few. The MANY deserve thanks and praise, not scorn, hatred and negative/critical media attention because of what someone did before them.
“But remember that your freedom to do it is protected by the MANY soldiers serving this great country”
I’m sorry, but my freedom of speech has very very little do with the soldiers in Iraq right now. The President who put them there has done very little to encourage freedom of speech since he took office. In fact, he’s done the opposite. I’ll save my thanks for the folks who fought in World War II, against a genuine enemy.
I would that our soldiers in Iraq shoot Paul Bremer in the head the next time they see him and demand that they be airlifted home as soon as possible. That would be the most helpful thing they could to “heal” the relationship betwee the US and the Middle East.
Update: Several US Senators agree.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review