Tim Lambert has a devastating critique of Steve Milloy, operator of the "junkscience.com" site attached to the Cato Institute, and model for many of the similar party-line science sites that have proliferated in the blogosphere. Most of these promote some combination of
As with John Lott and the American Enterprise Institute, the link between Cato and Milloy raises the question of how an institution that has some pretensions to respectability and employs some decent people can justify supporting such unethical and intellectually bankrupt charlatans.
Fling everything you can and see what sticks, eh? I’m not a fan of Milloy, but the notion that he is pro-creationism is simply false. Check out “Ask a Scholar” at the Cato Institute’s web site where he says, “That said, some sort of evolutionary process seems most likely in my opinion.” Oops! I guess you weren’t quite telling the truth, were you?
I’m not asking you to like Milloy, but is it too much to ask that you not engage in lies and overstate your case?
That isn’t an anti-creationist view. Milloy stresses the possibility of doubt about evolution, particularly in humans and higher animals. Intelligent design theory is more resolutely anti-creationist than Milloy appears to be. He may not be openly supporting creationist beliefs, but it’s quite fair to say he’s boosting it, and in ways that are a little odd for a site that claims to be opposed to junk science.
In all fairness to John Q., the interview with Milloy does look very “soft on creationism”. Being soft on creationism is forgivable for people who do not paint themselves as defenders of science, but obviously not for Milloy.
If you search the junkscience.com websitefor the word “evolution”, you’ll find in addition to that tendentitious Philip Johnson commentary (which is the worst sort of lawyer-promoted junk science), lots of links to editorials and articles regarding the controversies over teaching of evolution in schools, most appearing in places which are sympathetic to teaching evolution, and some of which are explicitly hostile to teaching creationism. So calling Molloy a booster for creationism is being economical with the truth.
Here’s the full Q&A linked by classic liberal (emphasis added by me).
Q: What’s the real deal on evolution? Twenty years ago on “Cosmos,” Carl Sagan said it wasn’t a “theory” but a “law.” My Christian friends tell me it’s a theory shot full of errors. And my scientist friends tell me it’s provable in the everyday world.A; Explanations of human evolution are not likely to move beyond the stage of hypothesis or conjecture. There is no scientific way - i.e., no experiment or other means of reliable study - for explaining how humans developed. Without a valid scientific method for proving a hypothesis, no indisputable explanation can exist.
The process of evolution can be scientifically demonstrated in some lower life forms, but this is a far cry from explaining how humans developed.
That said, some sort of evolutionary process seems most likely in my opinion. But there will probably always be enough uncertainty in any explanation of human evolution to give critics plenty of room for doubt.
As regards the links noted by Antony, most of them appear to be presented without comment from Milloy, unlike the Johnson piece.
Here’s a piece by Milloy, supporting “equal time” for creationists. He includes a disclaimer that he himself is not a creationist, but the whole thrust of the piece is that creationism is a legitimate scientific viewpoint and should be treated on a par with evolution.
Can anyone sum up the motives and intentions of these guys? Has anyone ever? It isn’t just toadying for big business is it? Really now, it has to be something bigger than that. Are there crop circles near where Steven Millroy lives? Cattle with surgically removed recti?
Maybe there’s a period of his autobiography he can’t account for? A long weekend trip to Vegas that turned into a three month AWOL and no credit-card trail?
-
Put “creationism” in the same paper bag with “climate change”-denial and the erstwhile “war in Iraq”. Shake it up real good.
Now reach your hand in there.
msg,
So money from Scaife (and I have no idea if Milloy is a recipient) is no longer a sufficient explanation? I thought the greediness of conservatives explained all their actions, at least that’s how leftists view it. But now it has to be somethinge even more sinister, eh? Mere money couldn’t corrupt someone as much as Milloy has been corrupted, therefore it must be aliens.
As for Mr. Quiggin, he again overstates his case, bordering on lying. The Milloy piece he refers to in the above comment is about global warming. The reference to creationism is background on a particular reporter, not “the whole thrust of the piece”.
Milloy is an opinionated hack. You don’t need to make up stuff to produce a devastating critique of him, so why do it?
The quote from John Q is far from dishonest; the language used by Milloy is classic creationist-speak. Essentially, anything that you can’t do in a lab experiment is pure speculation and is on an equal footing with theological speculation. And, of course, it also can’t be used to limit the ability of large, wealthy corporations to do whatever they want to do.
Marc
Marc,
the problem for people pushing the “Milloy=creationist” line is that he’s already quoted as saying that he believes evolution is the most likely explanation. Please show me any other creationist who does that.
The attempt to prove that Milloy is a creationist by showing he doesn’t criticize them enough is like showing that leftists are pro-mass murder because they don’t criticize communist dictators enough.
Classic Liberal, your comments are getting close to a violation of Godwin’s Law, but I’ll try to respond. On the article by Milloy I quoted, I will respond to your quibble and say “the whole thrust of the piece as far as it concerns creationism is that creationism is a legitimate scientific viewpoint and should be treated on a par with evolution.”
But Milloy’s parallel discussion of global warming only strengthens my case. He criticises the scientific establishment for its attitude to global warming sceptics then criticises it in exactly parallel terms for its attitude to creationism.
On your most recent comment, where did I assert that “Milloy is a creationist”? I said in my post that he is boosting creationism, and, as the thread clearly shows, he is in fact pushing the policy position of the creationists, namely “equal time”. As far as I’m concerned that’s “boosting” them.
Finally, if you read the Lambert post I linked to, there’s no need to speculate about Scaife money. Milloy’s money comes from the tobacco lobby.
As a currently practicing “junk scientist” I think it is important to consider the source. Milloy has a myriad of degrees but none in an actual research field. He has never published any original research and has no formal training in the things he critiques. But he ceratinly gets alot of press, more than an actual scientist.
There has been quite a bit of reaction to my post on Milloy.
Michael Peckham writes ...
Read more at Deltoid
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review