This bit from a NYT article on iTunes struck me as a particularly noteworthy example of the regurgitated press-release masquerading as analysis.
Sometime before the end of the year, Microsoft is expected to begin its push into the music download business. Microsoft will attempt to catch up with Apple by deploying its new Windows technology, called Windows Media Digital Rights Management, that will let users more easily transfer song collections from their personal computers to their portable MP3 players.
Freedom is Slavery how are ya. Media DRM 10 has nothing whatsoever to do with making it easier for users to transfer their song collections, and everything to do with making sure that they don’t do things with their song collections that the record companies wouldn’t like them to do. In other words, it’ll make transferring music harder, not easier - if it makes it easier than it already is, then it’s not doing the job that it’s supposed to do. I suppose that you could make some class of a contorted argument that DRM will make record companies happier to flog tunes for portable players etc etc, but that isn’t what the journalist is saying. Sloppy work.
In related news, Microsoft’s forthcoming patch for Windows XP will make it easier for worm and virus writers to transfer their work to your computer.
Good source for news on related topics is http://www.corante.com/copyfight/
…And it isn’t necessarily for MP3 players, it’s for Windows Media players, just as the iTunes DRM is for AAC-with-iTunes-DRM players.
Incidentally, I think that Apple’s greatest innovation here was their pricing structure, which instantly became an industry standard for online a la carte music sales. Even some bands selling MP3s directly to fans have imitated it. It could be argued that it’s still too high, but it seems to be about right to move some product.
I believe the way that paragraph makes sense is if you read it as saying “makes it easier for users to transfer DRMed files, like the ones they buy on those stupid iTunes-style stores (but especially ones rented from subscription services), to their portable devices.”
Matt: Apple’s biggest innovation was not their pricing structure- but you’re close. Their biggest innovation was to insist with an iron, unyielding will upon this one element:
Music bought on iTunes will be of one price. Furthermore, there will be no jiggery-pokery of “no burn”, “listen 3 times”, “lasts a week”, or other bizarre licensing arrangements. Everything is the same.
If you get record companies into a deal with you, what they’ll do is sit around and try to wrench every perceived dime out of the music venture. This includes effectively hanging the venture by the neck so that you can re-use the air in its metaphorical lungs. Apple was smart enough to put the kibosh on that.
Can anyone point me to a plausible scenario in which record companies might provide their intellectual property for online distribution without some sort of DRM in place to provide some built-in assurance that their legally granted rights will be protected?
The problem with “music bought on iTunes shall be one price” is that the Necks, e.g., get screwed, since all their albums are one 1-hour track (or can you just sell the whole album, and not individual tracks? I don’t use iTunes so I dunno).
Can anyone point me to a plausible scenario in which publishers like the New York Times or Dow Jones might provide their intellectual property for online distribution without some sort of DRM in place to provide some built-in assurance that their legally granted rights will be protected?
(Note, by the way, that the New York Times provides the same “intellectual property” on their website for free that they sell in their paper. Dow Jones, publishers of the Wall Street Journal, provides their articles only to paid subscribers, but does not protect them with any kind of “DRM”. Both the New York Times and Dow Jones, will, no doubt, take legal actions to protect their rights, as needed — and they don’t need any DRM to do so. And record companies have been happily providing their wares for years on these little silvery discs called “CDs” which, at least until recently, have lacked any form of DRM. They may complain that they aren’t selling as many of these “CDs” as they think they ought to be, but I don’t see them quitting the business — unless, that is, they can con the public into buying CD-like products that have been crippled with DRM.)
Yep you can buy albums for between $8 and $14, usually $10. I’ve never seen songs longer than 7 or 8 minutes sold as individual tracks on iTunes. For instance on the latest Wilco album you can buy all the songs except the two 10+ minute songs as individual tracks - you only get those two if you give them $10 for the album. The Necks don’t actually have anything on iTunes, but they could easily enough do this.
alex: Good points, but you have to remember that newspapers and magazines make the bulk of their money from advertising, so it isn’t really the same thing. The point about CDs is important, as it draws us to the question of why record companies were happy to release their music on unprotected CDs, but not on unprotected MP3s. Obviously there’s a difference in how these media are perceived in the industry.
I can go the store right now (well, not right now, it’s 11PM) and buy non-DRMed RIAA product.
What’s the difference between that and downloading it?
If I want to share the music I bought in CD form, the process takes less than ten minutes. Pop in the CD, run CDEX, click a button and come back a few minutes later. Voila, ready for sharing.
The music industry is run by idiots.
“Sloppy work”
No, not sloppy at all, actually.
A couple extra comments: When CDs were introduced in the early 80s, of course, the Internet was called ARPANET, had only a few thousand users, and “file sharing” meant handing a manila folder to someone else in your office. Obviously, no need for DRM was seen at this point.
Second, remember that once upon a time, “copy protection” was nearly universal on commercial PC software. Software was sold on floppy disks, and vendors would do stuff like hide data in non-standard locations on the disk so that standard disk copy routines could not copy them.
But consumers rebelled — they couldn’t make backup copies without buying special copy software designed to get around the vendor’s tricks, they had to have the original floppy disk when running the software, and so on. Copy protection pissed off computer users enough that after a while, software vendors stopped using it. Only more recently have vendors started to try to implement registration schemes — and when Intuit, maker of the popular US income tax preparation software TurboTax, tried it, they eventually had to back down.
Now maybe the recording and movie industries think that their consumers are less sophisticated than software purchasers, but the software industry provides a cautionary tale for anyone planning to add DRM.
It’s not quite true that everything is the same on iTunes. Some tracks can only be bought as part of an album (which is how they get around the 1-hour-track-for-a-dollar problem), and some albums do cost more than others.
But everything is much closer to being the same than with the other early attempts at per-track sales; the licensing restrictions on what you can do after getting the tracks are uniform (and not terribly onerous).
On the other hand, they are not necessarily constant in time. Apple tweaked the rules with the last iTunes revision: if I recall correctly, they slightly decreased the number of CD burns you could get from a playlist that included purchased songs, and slightly increased the number of computers you could authorize for streaming.
As for other comments above… record companies have in fact experimented with selling non-DRMed music online: emusic.com is or was a Vivendi Universal project, right?
And bands have sometimes sold them directly; to use my personal favorite example, They Might Be Giants just opened an online MP3 store a few days ago that uses the Apple pricing model, but sells non-DRMed music (there’s a long spiel there about how they’re trusting the fans not to abuse it). TMBG is a band with a long-time, respectful cult following, so this model might work better for them than for others.
…On the other side of the coin, while record companies were happy to release unprotected CDs back when it was difficult or impossible for most people to copy them, now the big guys are not happy about it at all, and are trying various harebrained schemes to copy-protect CDs, which seem to be meeting with some customer resistance. (Actually, precisely speaking, such discs are not CDs: Philips has said that it will try to enforce its trademark on the “Compact Disc” name and logo, and keep them off of these things.)
…And even back then they were irritated about home taping, and put forth the usual fanciful calculations about how much money it supposedly lost them.
Zak: Certainly. eMusic used to provide entire bands’ and indie record labels’ catalogs on a subscription basis via un-DRMed MP3s. The labels’ theory seemed to be that Blonde Redhead and Amon Tobin could use the exposure and file trading wasn’t going to see file trading cut into their giant multiplatinum album sales because their g.m.a.s. didn’t exist. A lot of people used eMusic as a quasi-radio station, and it led to a lot of people discovering new bands; then eMusic changed the pricing model and most people I know dropped the service.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review