Another Damned Medievalist worries in comments about the perils of blogging for the untenured academic.
I’d like to ask those of you who already have tenure and may be on hiring committees — what happens if you know a candidate from the blogosphere? Should people on the market blog (Ms Mentor says to be careful)? If the blog is not academic, is it relevant to the search (although I can’t imaging that it wouldn’t have some influence on whether a candidate is a ‘good fit’? Inquiring minds want to know!
As an untenured faculty member meself, I have little wisdom to offer.
I’d be amazed if it worked against people in my department, mainly because most of the non-bloggers seem unaware of the practice, but also because if the issue arose my guess is that the bloggers (me and 2 of the folks at 617) would assert bloggers rights as it were. But each department is idosyncratic, as is each blog. I have seen blogs which have appalled me by their rudeness, carelessness, and apparent revelations of the character of the blogger — but I doubt I, or my colleagues, would let that override an otherwise positive assessment of the person.
Is adm thinking of dropping pseudonymity? In adm’s case I’d say that would not be a bad move at all.
I’m not quite tenured yet, but close enough so I’ll throw in 2 pennies worth.
I can’t imagine it would make a huge difference except in two cases.
First, if I know someone’s name for any reason at all, including through their blog, it’s a lot harder to cut them out at early stages. So their file might get looked at much more closely than a lot of other files which are, inevitably, fairly similar. I think standing out from the crowd for any reason at all is important, especially when there’s 400 or so applicants, all of them prima facie impressive.
Second, the blog might let me know that the person does interesting stuff outside their speciality area. That matters a bit to me, so that might help.
But the blog would be less important than the quality of the writing sample, job talk and so on, so it wouldn’t make a huge difference either way.
For me? I’d be charmed and delighted unless the blogger-scholar turned out to be one of the true bottom-feeders of the blogosphere. And I can’t think of anyone about whom that could be said, actually (scholar-blogger and bottom-feeder).
For my colleagues? I don’t think most of them would care, unless they felt that this was all the person did or published. Then they’d care a lot and it wouldn’t be a good thing. As long as you could demonstrate a sufficiently respectable productivity in “normal” research domains, I don’t think it would be a problem. Possibly it would be an issue for a highly political or intemperately controversial scholar-blogger depending on the circumstance. I don’t think most of my colleagues would even bother to look at a web page that a candidate maintained, though.
You don’t list your blog on your CV, do you?
As a non-anonymous aca-blogger let me say that precisely NONE of my 160 colleagues have discovered my sideline. I revealed myself to 2 — to one close friend and to one senior faculty member to ask advice.
No one has bothered to google me, either — The blog shows up above my ‘professional’ page.
None of my students has mentioned it.
As someone who’s been on search committees, I can’t say that anyone has suggested “let’s google everyone in the top 25” or “conference interview list” anymore than they’ve said “let’s check for previous felony convictions,” though.
So, I’m not worried. Maybe someday googling candidates will occur to a committee, but I haven’t seen it yet!
Perhaps the question to ask yourself is: are you really revealing anything more than what a search committee would gather from your letter, CV, references and interview? For a job candidate, there might be a legitimate concern when you move into what are legal no-go zones for search committees—politics, personal life, religious beliefs. Then again, no matter how rigorously you self-censor, you’re always going to rub somebody the wrong way (and probably for the reason you’d least expect…).
Unless you’ve run into a really stuffy search committee—and I can remember some—I suspect most would feel engaged rather than otherwise with bloggers who took time out from the Theory of Everything to post about their pets (cute), vintage record collection (cool), film-going habits (useful topic of conversation), vacation plans (ditto), and so forth.
I agree with Brian’s point that, unless you’ve really embarrassed yourself, any name recognition that goes with blogging has to be a positive in the early stages of a search process.
Contrary to Michael’s experience, lots of my colleagues, and other friends and acquaintances, have mentioned my blog to me - rather more in fact that my visitor stats would lead me to expect, and quite a few more than mention my fortnightly column in a national newspaper. Admittedly, the newspaper is the Financial Review which is not that widely read in the circles in which I move, but still it has a circulation of nearly 100,000 compared to 400 unique visitors/day for my blog.
I don’t think it’s that easy to see the potential effects whether negative or positive. As with so many things we do, it’s sometimes hard to trace why things happen. That is, we go to conferences and meet people, we email with colleagues, etc, and although some of these activities lead to other things directly (e.g. an invitation to give a talk somewhere) others happen wihout a clear picture of why it came about, why someone knew about you and your work, why someone cared to contact you, etc.
I think as long as it’s one of many other things you do I can’t imagine it to be negative, but can see benefits. An important aspect was noted recently (by Brian?) in the “why academics blog” thread: the opportunity to try out ideas before pursuing them fully.
Of course, as others have stated, there can be exceptions if the tone of the blog is especially bad or rude and if your posts make it seem as though you’re clueless about your own field. But if you are then I suspect that comes across in your work anyway so you may not make the cut.
By the way, I was blogging for about six months when I went on the job market and did fine so I doubt it had any negative impact (but of course we never know why we didn’t make the cut somewhere so I can’t know for sure).
I believe that Matt Kirschenbaum (whose blog is listed in Crooked Timber’s blogroll) is not yet tenured. His is a great example of how to use blogging to create a space for an intellectual community of sorts.
I’m not yet tenured, but I have served on hiring committees, and I don’t think a consciousness of blogging has penetrated most of the academic world (although this varies by displine — lawyers and political scientists/philosophers seem especially well-respresented to me). I know of nobody from my department except myself who has ever thought to Google a candidate or wonder whether s/he blogged — and I have never actually Googled a candidate, simply because I always felt I’d gotten plenty of information with which to make my decision at each interiview stage. I do check out short-listed candidates’ websites when they tell us about them.
If a fellow blogger applied for a job at my institution, I’d probably tend to root for them unless they had an especially lamentable blog (I can’t think of any offhand), and if it was a fellow blogger with whom I regularly and fruitfully interacted I would mention that to my colleagues as a large positive.
All that said, I am as private of a person as it’s capable to be while blogging the occasional life detail for the benefit of whoever wanders by. ;) I like to control what information about me is available under my professional name. Also, blogging doesn’t lend itself to quite the same level of rigorous editing and fact-checking I put into my published scholarly work. So I’m staying pseudonymous until I get tenure and can formally thumb my nose at the system. ;)
What led me to give up my own blog is that quite a few people who I knew read it would not admit to reading it. (Acadmics often have very revealing ip-addresses — sometimes with the name of the person written right into it.) My impression is that this is true in general: a lot of people look at blogs the way they look at, shall we say, the drudge report — guiltily and disapprovingly and with an interest that can only be described as salacious.
I’ve concluded that the blogosphere is a dangerous plan for any nonanonymous untenured academic to hang out. Harry says that “non-bloggers seem unaware of the practice,” but I’m sure that’s not true. Look at your logs. There are a lot of people in the academy reading blogs, forming opinions of bloggers, and I have to assume letting those opinions influence their hiring and tenuring decisions — all without ever admitting to anyone that they’ve even heard of the medium.
We who have blogged tend to be charitable toward other bloggers, since we know how hard it is. I fear that those who merely look on may, for all-too-predictable psychological reasons, not be as charitable.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review