It’s already 1 May in Australia, so I get to make what will no doubt be the first of many posts on the significance of the day.
First, and still the most important in the long historical view is the holiday (a public holiday here in Queensland) celebrating the achievements of the labour movement.
Second, there’s the admission of ten new members to the EU. As far as the historical significance of this event goes, I’m waiting to see whether Turkey is admitted to accession negotiations later in the year.
Thirdly, and of most immediate interest, the anniversary of Bush declaration of victory looks as good a time as any to date what seems increasingly certain to be a defeat [at least for the policies pursued for the past year, and for the objective of a stable, pro-American Iraq]. Of course, this judgement may turn out to be as premature as was Bush’s statement a year ago, but the decline in the US position has been almost as rapid as the collapse of Saddam’s regime, and the events of the last few days have seen the process accelerating.
Among a range of events the most important have included:
The Administration seems to be inching towards the position I’ve been advocating for some time - dumping the policies of Bremer and Chalabi (though not, unfortunately Bremer and Chalabi themselves), and handing over real military power to Iraqis. If the interim (still inchoate) government has substantial real power, manages to hold early elections and can get enough support to permit a rapid US withdrawal, the outcome might not be too bad. But there’s very little time left, and this scenario assumes exceptionally skilful management of the situation from now on.
1 Predictably enough, there have been quibbles about this word. But mock-executions such as the one shown here are among the worst forms of torture - from my reading of survivor accounts, they are mentioned with more horror than beatings. And of course what we are seeing is only what the guards chose to photograph for their own amusement.
In the spirit of the Kentucky Derby… it’s Quiggin by a nose over Farrell to win the coveted crown “most relentlessly partisan CT poster”!
Partisanship ain’t so bad. As Barry Goldwater said, extremism, in defense of liberty, is no vice. Couldn’t agree with the old guy more.
The treatment of a Ba’athist general taking charge of Fallujah as a ‘defeat’ is, however, bad. There is a world beyond Bush hating and loving. In this world, people are pulverized by ‘surgical” American air strikes, or incinerated in the suicide bombs of the ‘resistance’. The emotional response of the Fallujans to the Iraqi general might be about the fact that — it is their battle and their country. Freedom is not about the Americans thrusting their constitution up the nose of the Iraqis — it is about sovereignty, autonomy, recognition, inspiration, improvisation. That’s the life of the thing. If the recognition of this is presented as a defeat for the U.S., it will simply animate further, and worse, policy — easy to stir up among the resentful American right.
Why do it? The urge to jeer should be balanced, at least, by the urge to encourage the process given in your sensible insight:
“If the interim (still inchoate) government has substantial real power, manages to hold early elections and can get enough support to permit a rapid US withdrawal, the outcome might not be too bad.”
Actually, it would be great. Iraq, without Saddam, operating on its own, groping towards democratic structures, sounds like a good thing to me.
I’m not offended to be called “partisan”. But asg might want to read the comments thread on my last-but-one post (on David Brooks) where it was unanimously asserted that I was not partisan enough.
roger, I’ve edited the original post slightly in response to your comments, with which I generally agree.
er, how can he be a partisan if, um, he’s Australian?
Roger, I’m not so sure that a rapid pullout of US forces would be anywhere near as good for Iraq as you seem to think. Neither am I convinced that Iraq groping towards democracy on its own would be a particularly pleasant situation for Iraqis. Transitions from dictatorships to democracy tend to be very dangerous times. With foreign forces removed, it’s not entirely unlikely that existing Iraqi factions would set about fighting amongst themselves. If they did there’s no certainty that they’d ever settle down this decade.
I suppose it’s possible that all Iraq is united towards the purpose of democracy and self-rule, and that a US withdrawal would result in a peaceful establishment of enlightened government, but the possibility that Iraq is another vicious civil war or regular old bloody free-for-all waiting for a chance to erupt should also be considered. But it might not happen.
Roger, I’m not so sure that a rapid pullout of US forces would be anywhere near as good for Iraq as you seem to think…
Ah, but the decision on whether there is a rapid pullout, or any pullout, or US forces will be driven by whether the decision is good for the US, not wheter it is good for Iraq.
They are, after all, US forces.
And altruistic concern for the material well-being or physical safety of far-away people has not been a hallmark of the present US government.
Some fine day we’ll hit the magic BON (Bug-Out Number) with our casulaties, and that will be that.
Roger, I’m not so sure that a rapid pullout of US forces would be anywhere near as good for Iraq as you seem to think…
Ah, but the decision on whether there is a rapid pullout, or any pullout, or US forces will be driven by whether the decision is good for the US, not wheter it is good for Iraq.
They are, after all, US forces.
And altruistic concern for the material well-being or physical safety of far-away people has not been a hallmark of the present US government.
Some fine day we’ll hit the magic BON (Bug-Out Number) with our casulaties, and that will be that.
oops….
I didn’t realize that United States soldiers were gang raping women:
The rape photos are fake…sorry.
Davis, I think you are right. But I wonder whether you think that being right, here, shows the U.S. to be doing something immoral. Actually, I think it shows that the U.S. is operating as a nation.
The whole problem, to my mind, with the occupation is that the pro-war camp has painted a picture of the U.S. as a moral force. As a moral force, the U.S. would have collapsed long ago. The U.S. represents its state interests. Now, those interests are themselves up for grabs among us, but the idea that we somehow magically represent Iraq’s interests is, I think, by definition wrong. Sure, our interests should be tempered by a cosmopolitan awareness of the rules of justice. We should all cross our hearts and pledge allegiance to the Critique of Practical Reason. The same principal holds for the nation of Iraq. That the U.S. could have a self interest in helping create an Iraq that necessarily follows its own self interest is, to paraphrase St. Paul, a stumbling block to the neo-cons and a scandal to the Wilsonian liberals. Nevertheless, I think it is true. To move from Kant to Hegel — our statecraft, here, has to be based on concretely accepting the autonomy of the other. Otherwise we will be caught in endless Master-Slave games — the true quagmire.
If, in fact, the U.S. were more overt about its interests in Iraq, we could have a discussion in this country of just what those interests are. Personally, I don’t think those interests are well represented by the visions of the Defense Department’s Pumphouse gang — the Wolfowitzes, Rumsfelds, and such. Unfortunately, such discussions are almost immediately diverted by the moralistic rhetoric that Americans traditionally love to indulge in, and that amused and infuriated Dickens a century and a half ago.
I think and have argued on my blog
that having US troops in Iraq, whether or not under UN leadership, is worse than having them withdrawn, because the US military is not up to the task of fighting a guerilla war.
In a worst case scenario when the US leaves Iraq, we get a full blown civil war; but in the worst case scenario when they don’t, we have the same thing, with the US military caught in the middle.
Oh, absolutely, roger. It will be a far better, and probably more peaceful, day, when the US, and the folks who run it, just ‘fess up and admit it: “We’re just this nation-state, you know”.
American action abroad seems mostly of wanting or needing to do X, realizing that X is at first glance going to be regrettable, saying “But this is America! We’re different!” and then going and doing something regrettable anyways.
Hans J. Morgethau must be positively spinning in his grave.
John,
You mention that a majority of Iraqis want the US to leave “immediately” - but omit to mention the not unsignificant fact that this is taken to mean “a few months”. Also the same poll shows a majority believe a (truly) immediate withdrawal would diminish stability.
Also “[t]he abandonment of the siege of Fallujah, with none of the US objectives achieved” strikes me as a bit oddly put, given that I imagine you wouldn’t have been entirely happy had what was necesary for “US objecitves” to be achieved been done.
Personally I’m a bit more uncomfortable with the “siege” itself than with its apparent end. At any rate I think its at least an open question as to which has been more conducive to a positive outcome in Iraq.
JQ,
Your penultimate link is the same as the last, surely a mistake..plus, I’d like to see the correct links so I can see the poll data.
If this led to the withdrawl of US troops, shouldn’t you be thrilled?
james, I realise my post wasn’t clear, but I agree that the lifting of the siege was a better outcome than its continuation, or an all-out assault.
sebastian, I can’t say i’m thrilled by the prospect of an early (within months) withdrawal of US troops, but it’s beginning to look like there will be no better option.
marksteen - link fixed now
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review