As I write this, Nightline just flashed, together, the photographs of the two dead in Iraq whom I knew from younger days: Kim Hampton and Eric Paliwoda. I didn’t realize they were killed sequentially. They fell in the line of duty, on the field of battle, and there is honor in their lives and deaths. What remains is for us to impart honor to the cause in which they served. I speak not of the defense of the United States: this is forever honorable, and right. I speak of the creation of a just Iraq. This would be an Iraq in which jihadis do not walk free, in which Ba’athist generals no longer rule, and in which civil war is not the near-inevitable future. That this Iraq does not exist, and will not exist because of our choices, means we have profoundly dishonored our dead there. They deserve better: something right, and lasting. It is hard to see those faces, those young faces, among the roll call of the dead. I look at them, and it strikes me that in walking away from Fallujah, we are walking away from their graves; leaving their light and memory to the cruel care of those who killed them. It is the worst of all worlds, for there is comfort in a parent’s asking, “Why did my child die?” and finding the answer, “For liberty, for justice, for America.” Now, in this defeat, as we slowly take the abdication of our duties to its inexorable end, that answer changes into something awful; something that should be a reproach to our halfhearted leaders to the ends of their days: “For nothing.”
I recommed you go read both linked posts in thier entirety. Tacitus has always been a fairly eloquent fellow (if, like his namesake, inclined to morose skepticism about human affairs), and white-hot searing rage and disappointment have spurred him to new heights.
(And read this post for title quote from my and John’s favorite Melville, The Confidence Man.)
Hubris, ate, nemesis, Prozac.
“white-hot searing rage and disappointment have spurred him to new heights.”
A sad moment for Tacitus.
Sadder still if—as it appears to anyone examining events in Falluja carefully—there’s been no “retreat” there at all.
The Marines, startling as it may sound amid all the gibbering about “withdrawl,” have pacified the vast majority of Falluja.
They’ve slowly and methodically acquired enough control over that city that it’s now feasible to hand the zones they’ve demilitarized over to Iraqis—which, though this fact seems to have become a repressed memory, had been CENTCOM’s announced goal all along.
The motley assortment of insurgents Coalition Forces vowed to either “capture or kill,” insurgents who once held the entire city of Falluja, have been literally boxed into its Northwestern slums.
And there has been no notice of withdrawal from that pivotal perimeter: the only perimeter that now matters.
Throughout April, U.S. Marines have conducted precise and relentless operations designed to accomplish one goal: that of “boxing in” the enemy without resorting to full scale urban combat. The purely public relations “ceasefires” of the last month have served as a useful cover for those successful operations.
That Tacitus—and nearly everyone else, apparently—is under the impression that Falluja has been left in the hands of insurgents is an unfortunate side-effect of conducting wildly successful operations under cover of a darkness both political and actual.
Once the remaining die-hard insurgents still bottled up inside Falluja’s “Golan cordon” are either killed or captured by the Marines who are at this very moment tightening a noose around them (even as less careful observers announce their “retreat” from the entire city), the true ingenuity of Operation Valiant Resolve will become apparent. Even to prematurely glum bloggers like Tacitus, and those who seem to quote his pessimism appreciatively.
Wretchard, at belmontclub.blogspot.com, provides enlightening further reading on the ongoing operations in Falluja. Worth checking out for anyone also suffering from Tacitus’s “white-hot rage and disappointment.”
At least for anyone who doesn’t enjoy such sensations.
Haven’t you read Pierre or the Ambiguities?
Tacitus has always been a fairly eloquent fellow
Uuck.
First, he has that fetishistic shrillness about everything militar (damn, enlist, mate, and get over with it) that gets old quickly.
Then, there’s the quiet naivety of his pattern : “hey look how nicely reality matches my preconceptions, makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside”. This part gets really funny when he travels (he’s a bit of an “airmiles” type too).
To be fair i must confess i have to be in a real good mood to stand sullivan’s spin-a-thon more than two minutes, and that i bounced on what appeared to me a thick wall of francophobia last time i tried drezner. And the volokh are oh-so-clever but libertarians are bad for my blood pressure.
So i may not be best judge for right wing blogs :-)
damn, enlist, mate, and get over with it
First Lieutenant, United States Army Engineers, thanks.
Not a glorious or noteworthy stint, but it was done.
Well, dan, we can hope you are right; but if you read all of Tacitus’ two posts (and their comments) on the recent events in Falluja (quite eloquent and well-reasoned, even if “prematurely glum”), you’ll note that his main outrage comes not so much from what has actually been done by the Marines - and by extension, the US command in general - in the city re the “insurgency”, but from how it will be spun in the Iraqi and Arab press, i.e. as a major defeat for the US, and a major victory for the “resistance” - and “Islam”.
The first part of Tacitus’ first post on Falluja, IMO, states the basis of probably the fundamental and (so-far) intractable problem we face in Iraq: an adversary (whether outright “enemies” or not) whose world-view and mind-set are so drastically different from ours, that interpretations of “victory” and “defeat” are not necessarily connected to reality - at least as we perceive “reality”.
Not a glorious or noteworthy stint, but it was done.
Where our hero discovers sometimes experience is not enough to kill romanticism.
I can hardly object to any reference to Melville’s wonderful “The Confidence Man”, but surely the fragment from “The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about” is from Oscar Wilde,
The operations in Fallujah might have appeared “precise,” to those only watching the censored American media. Some of us aren’t so docile, and are wondering what victory can actually mean where “liberation” is an open joke, and torture no big deal. Perhaps Dan can go paint the ruins of another school?
And, on the subject of media, the disciplining of the American kind continues. Quoth the Sinclair:
We understand that our decision in this matter may be questioned by some. Before you judge our decision, however, we would ask that you first question Mr. Koppel as to why he chose to read the names of the 523 troops killed in combat in Iraq, rather than the names of the thousands of private citizens killed in terrorists attacks since and including the events of September 11, 2001. In his answer, you will find the real motivation behind his action scheduled for this Friday.
Note the conflation. Iraq: terrorism. Nice. Buy my non-sequitur or the terrorists win.
That, my fellow lumber pile inhabitants, is the face of the enemy: giving aid and comfort to the murderers of thousands. Who’s next?
I hasten to add: great credit to Tacitus, who does not obligingly repeat that the Memory Hole is the only fit place to honor our dead. It is amazing what “patriotism” requires these days, and I applaud those patriots who will not oblige. People who repeat their government’s ever-shifting cover-stories can be found cowering in any dictatorship. There is nothing American about them.
(To those who engineered this: your victims died screaming, and so should you. Be thankful you will be judged by people better than you and more forgiving than me.)
Tacitus may be a “fairly eloquent fellow”, but he is a fool. There will not be a “just Iraq” in the next ten years, or in the next hundred; and imagining that there might be is so fatuous, and so defiantly ignorant, as to be deeply immoral. Neither will there be a “just America” in the next ten years, or the next hundred; after that, I will hope—which may simply reveal me as a fool in my turn, but that does not justify Tacitus.
What’s the matter with you Belle? You’re such a clever person normally. Just because Tacitus is a slightly more literate and consistent version of the armchair militarist blowhards found on the warblogs doesn’t mean that he is actually thoughtful. Can’t you see through that stuff?
Just for a start: the problem with Fallujah is that razing it won’t help us and neither will retreating from it. We are in a no win situation there. Why? Because that stupid war that Tacitus and his buddies cheered on from the sidelines is indeed turning into the full-on disaster that rational people could see it becoming the whole time. And what’s his response? To chew out Bush for not escalating the whole mess further.
I’ve posted an analysis of the current Bush paralysis, and how it reflects some larger problems on the right. Conservatives have made the error of substituting argument for policy, and that hubris has landed us in the situation in which we find ourselves. Please take a look at:
http://worldonfire.typepad.com/world_on_fire/2004/05/argument_vs_pol.html
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review