This makes so much more sense to me than this. I certainly appreciate the goal of getting more women in the White House and other political positions, but I think it’s a stretch to suggest that the gender of a candidate trumps all other factors including a candidate’s position on all issues. (I came across the EMILY’s List Web site by clicking on this ad in the NYTimes.)
With all due respect, Eszter, where does The White House Project suggest that nothing matters but sex? They focus on candidate’s sex, but nothing in their website leads to the conclusion that they’d support Bozo the Clown running for office if only Bozo was female.
They don’t say much about the position the candidates take. In this case it’s not so much what they say, it’s what they don’t say. It sounds to me like they’re more interested in having a woman than what that woman might stand for. That’s my understanding. If they have some specific issues in mind, I don’t think they do a good job of communicating that.
As long as they aren’t a total loony (Moseley Braun?), I’d almost certainly vote for a woman candidate for little reason other than her sex. I’d do the same for a black person. (Too bad Moseley Braun is a loony.) I feel that the symbolic value of breaking these barriers is enormous and justifies overriding other concerns. I recognize that reasonable people will differ with me on this. But I don’t think my position is unreasonable.
I’ve always liked Elizabeth Dole and I would have voted for her against Gore had she gotten the nomination. I’ve liked her ever since she was the chair of the Republican National Committee during the Reagan era and she single-handedly resisted the inclusion of an anti-abortion plank in the platform. I think she got a bad rap in the media when she was running. And her husband wasn’t very supportive.
Ooh—if only there were a moderate Democrat female candidate who is a veteran. Wow. That’d be so cool.
Oy veh. I have only one word to say on this issue - Thatcher. No indeed sex does not trump everything, or much of anything.
Keith, you’re being way too kind. That’s the nicest thing I’ve heard anybody say about Moseley Braun…
I’d like to echo Ophelia Benson’s timely reminder of Margaret Thatcher. I remember when she first ran for office that feminists across the UK were debating whether it was more important to have a woman in office, than party politics. Many thought that Thatcher would be remembered more for her gender than for her politics and voted accordingly. Boy, I bet they felt stupid!
I don’t know. Thatcher may have furthered the cause of women, worldwide, more than she hurt them by virtue of her policies.
I think that a female candidate for President of the US is now viable. But I don’t think that the general perception is that this is the case. How many fictional portrayals of the UK Prime Minister have been female since Thatcher’s day? How many fictional portrayals of US Presidents have been female?
Especially where legal barriers are removed or don’t exist, self-selection effects can be very large. I guarantee that a female US President would be followed by a large increase in the number of female Senators and US Representatives. And while the benefit of this may be hard to quantify; to me, in a world just now taking the first steps to eliminate sexism, it’s enormously important.
Preferring women for political office, merely because they are women, is sexist. Plain and simple. Maybe the historical sexism of the past justifies sexism in response, but that doesn’t make it any less sexism.
Depends upon one’s definition of “sexism”. As in the case of “racism”, if it means to “discriminate on the basis of X”, then you’re absolutely correct. If it means “oppression of a class of people on the basis of X” then your are not. Both definitions are useful for different purposes.
In this case, it would have been better had I written “oppression of women” instead of “sexism”.
As it happens, contrary to what you might expect from this exchange, I parted ways about ten years ago with contemporary feminism (as it had become “difference feminism”) and began self-identifying as an “anti-sexist” rather than as a “feminist”. And, as a general rule, I think that the cause of women (and men) in our society is now best served by an anti-sexist agenda rather than a feminist agenda. Even so, there are definitely exceptions where I feel that an explicitly “sexist” (in your terms), pro-woman position is still warranted.
And, in much of the non-Western world, women are still effectively chattel and the focus quite rightly should be upon ending their slavery, not ending “sexism” in its generalized sense.
À Gauche
Jeremy Alder
Amaravati
Anggarrgoon
Audhumlan Conspiracy
H.E. Baber
Philip Blosser
Paul Broderick
Matt Brown
Diana Buccafurni
Brandon Butler
Keith Burgess-Jackson
Certain Doubts
David Chalmers
Noam Chomsky
The Conservative Philosopher
Desert Landscapes
Denis Dutton
David Efird
Karl Elliott
David Estlund
Experimental Philosophy
Fake Barn County
Kai von Fintel
Russell Arben Fox
Garden of Forking Paths
Roger Gathman
Michael Green
Scott Hagaman
Helen Habermann
David Hildebrand
John Holbo
Christopher Grau
Jonathan Ichikawa
Tom Irish
Michelle Jenkins
Adam Kotsko
Barry Lam
Language Hat
Language Log
Christian Lee
Brian Leiter
Stephen Lenhart
Clayton Littlejohn
Roderick T. Long
Joshua Macy
Mad Grad
Jonathan Martin
Matthew McGrattan
Marc Moffett
Geoffrey Nunberg
Orange Philosophy
Philosophy Carnival
Philosophy, et cetera
Philosophy of Art
Douglas Portmore
Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
Jeremy Pierce
Punishment Theory
Geoff Pynn
Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
Conor Roddy
Sappho's Breathing
Anders Schoubye
Wolfgang Schwartz
Scribo
Michael Sevel
Tom Stoneham (moribund)
Adam Swenson
Peter Suber
Eddie Thomas
Joe Ulatowski
Bruce Umbaugh
What is the name ...
Matt Weiner
Will Wilkinson
Jessica Wilson
Young Hegelian
Richard Zach
Psychology
Donyell Coleman
Deborah Frisch
Milt Rosenberg
Tom Stafford
Law
Ann Althouse
Stephen Bainbridge
Jack Balkin
Douglass A. Berman
Francesca Bignami
BlunkettWatch
Jack Bogdanski
Paul L. Caron
Conglomerate
Jeff Cooper
Disability Law
Displacement of Concepts
Wayne Eastman
Eric Fink
Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
Peter Friedman
Michael Froomkin
Bernard Hibbitts
Walter Hutchens
InstaPundit
Andis Kaulins
Lawmeme
Edward Lee
Karl-Friedrich Lenz
Larry Lessig
Mirror of Justice
Eric Muller
Nathan Oman
Opinio Juris
John Palfrey
Ken Parish
Punishment Theory
Larry Ribstein
The Right Coast
D. Gordon Smith
Lawrence Solum
Peter Tillers
Transatlantic Assembly
Lawrence Velvel
David Wagner
Kim Weatherall
Yale Constitution Society
Tun Yin
History
Blogenspiel
Timothy Burke
Rebunk
Naomi Chana
Chapati Mystery
Cliopatria
Juan Cole
Cranky Professor
Greg Daly
James Davila
Sherman Dorn
Michael Drout
Frog in a Well
Frogs and Ravens
Early Modern Notes
Evan Garcia
George Mason History bloggers
Ghost in the Machine
Rebecca Goetz
Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
Jason Kuznicki
Konrad Mitchell Lawson
Danny Loss
Liberty and Power
Danny Loss
Ether MacAllum Stewart
Pam Mack
Heather Mathews
James Meadway
Medieval Studies
H.D. Miller
Caleb McDaniel
Marc Mulholland
Received Ideas
Renaissance Weblog
Nathaniel Robinson
Jacob Remes (moribund?)
Christopher Sheil
Red Ted
Time Travelling Is Easy
Brian Ulrich
Shana Worthen
Computers/media/communication
Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
Eric Behrens
Joseph Bosco
Danah Boyd
David Brake
Collin Brooke
Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
Jeff Erickson
Ed Felten
Lance Fortnow
Louise Ferguson
Anne Galloway
Jason Gallo
Josh Greenberg
Alex Halavais
Sariel Har-Peled
Tracy Kennedy
Tim Lambert
Liz Lawley
Michael O'Foghlu
Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
Alex Pang
Sebastian Paquet
Fernando Pereira
Pink Bunny of Battle
Ranting Professors
Jay Rosen
Ken Rufo
Douglas Rushkoff
Vika Safrin
Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
Frank Schaap
Robert A. Stewart
Suresh Venkatasubramanian
Ray Trygstad
Jill Walker
Phil Windley
Siva Vaidahyanathan
Anthropology
Kerim Friedman
Alex Golub
Martijn de Koning
Nicholas Packwood
Geography
Stentor Danielson
Benjamin Heumann
Scott Whitlock
Education
Edward Bilodeau
Jenny D.
Richard Kahn
Progressive Teachers
Kelvin Thompson (defunct?)
Mark Byron
Business administration
Michael Watkins (moribund)
Literature, language, culture
Mike Arnzen
Brandon Barr
Michael Berube
The Blogora
Colin Brayton
John Bruce
Miriam Burstein
Chris Cagle
Jean Chu
Hans Coppens
Tyler Curtain
Cultural Revolution
Terry Dean
Joseph Duemer
Flaschenpost
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
Jonathan Goodwin
Rachael Groner
Alison Hale
Household Opera
Dennis Jerz
Jason Jones
Miriam Jones
Matthew Kirschenbaum
Steven Krause
Lilliputian Lilith
Catherine Liu
John Lovas
Gerald Lucas
Making Contact
Barry Mauer
Erin O'Connor
Print Culture
Clancy Ratcliff
Matthias Rip
A.G. Rud
Amardeep Singh
Steve Shaviro
Thanks ... Zombie
Vera Tobin
Chuck Tryon
University Diaries
Classics
Michael Hendry
David Meadows
Religion
AKM Adam
Ryan Overbey
Telford Work (moribund)
Library Science
Norma Bruce
Music
Kyle Gann
ionarts
Tim Rutherford-Johnson
Greg Sandow
Scott Spiegelberg
Biology/Medicine
Pradeep Atluri
Bloviator
Anthony Cox
Susan Ferrari (moribund)
Amy Greenwood
La Di Da
John M. Lynch
Charles Murtaugh (moribund)
Paul Z. Myers
Respectful of Otters
Josh Rosenau
Universal Acid
Amity Wilczek (moribund)
Theodore Wong (moribund)
Physics/Applied Physics
Trish Amuntrud
Sean Carroll
Jacques Distler
Stephen Hsu
Irascible Professor
Andrew Jaffe
Michael Nielsen
Chad Orzel
String Coffee Table
Math/Statistics
Dead Parrots
Andrew Gelman
Christopher Genovese
Moment, Linger on
Jason Rosenhouse
Vlorbik
Peter Woit
Complex Systems
Petter Holme
Luis Rocha
Cosma Shalizi
Bill Tozier
Chemistry
"Keneth Miles"
Engineering
Zack Amjal
Chris Hall
University Administration
Frank Admissions (moribund?)
Architecture/Urban development
City Comforts (urban planning)
Unfolio
Panchromatica
Earth Sciences
Our Take
Who Knows?
Bitch Ph.D.
Just Tenured
Playing School
Professor Goose
This Academic Life
Other sources of information
Arts and Letters Daily
Boston Review
Imprints
Political Theory Daily Review
Science and Technology Daily Review