For the next several hours [sorry, you’re too late] Amazon has all four of the Eccleston/Tennant Doctor Who seasons for sale at a reasonable price; that is, 60% off the usual, quite absurd price. Last year my brother-in-law bought me the first series for X-Mas and I enjoyed it. But I’ve been unwilling to shell out $80 a season to find out what happened next. What am I? An idiot? Now that’s fixed.
Please feel free to argue about who the best doctor was/is.
Free MP3 for the night (via Stereogum): Pearl Harbor, “California Shakedown”. Sort of … I dunno, droney-droney-drone.
{ 60 comments }
belle le triste 11.13.09 at 3:08 pm
The best Doctor is always the Doctor you got when you were between 8-13. Hence Patrick Troughton the “Cosmic Hobo” and Jon Pertwee the “Silver Fox” are best as proven by science, and Tom Baker can go eat a giant big bag of dick-flavoured jellybabies.
John Holbo 11.13.09 at 3:10 pm
I can’t vouch for the flavor, but I think ‘a big bag full of jellybabies’ was about the BBC effects budget at the time. I think there were at least three episodes in which Tom Baker actually fought that bag.
John Holbo 11.13.09 at 3:21 pm
And, of course, being the greatest doctor, he defeated the bag.
alex 11.13.09 at 3:35 pm
Alas, every time I watch DW now, I am reminded that it is at heart a kids’ show, and that despite my best efforts to rehabilitate my inner geek, I just can’t ignore the cavernous plot-holes, so I give up on it for another year or two…
alex 11.13.09 at 3:36 pm
p.s. I did have hopes for Torchwood, but it rapidly proved to be just like DW, only run by people who couldn’t keep their pants on.
Richard J 11.13.09 at 3:38 pm
alex> Thank you. You’ve just reminded me of ‘Tom’s putting it in now’.
John Holbo 11.13.09 at 3:41 pm
Aw man, I have high hopes for Torchwood, which I haven’t watched yet.
Chuchundra 11.13.09 at 4:00 pm
I have a picture of Jon Pertwee holding my baby boy, so he’s my favorite Dcctor despite all the Tom Baker episodes I watched on channel 9 back in the 70’s and 80’s.
Pertwee was, by the way, tremendously charming and gracious. It was great to meet him and have a little banter back and forth. Certainly one of the high points of my fanboy career.
Matt McGrattan 11.13.09 at 4:35 pm
I’ve only watched the Ecclestone and Tennant episodes intermittently, but the quality has seemed quite patchy. Some episodes were really very very good indeed, and some were, as Alex says in 4 above.
norbizness 11.13.09 at 4:40 pm
Dr. Dre, or Dr. Funkenstein.
Keith 11.13.09 at 5:19 pm
David Tennant is my favorite Doctor currently. I relate to him better than any of the others, even if Peter David was my first Doctor. He’s tied for second with Tom Baker, naturally, with Christopher Eccleston a close third. All the others I’m sort of meh on. I’ve tried watching the older serials with the first 3 Doctors and they’re painfully slow and predictable, but that’s probably a side effect me being steeped in early 21st century visual media and they being from Mid 20th century visual media, when they were still figuring out how this whole thing worked.
It’s a small shame that Paul McGann’s 8th Doctor never got a fair shake.
Keith 11.13.09 at 5:22 pm
Torchwood is still lots of fun. They advertised it as Who for adults when it’s better described as Who for randy teens. Still good wholesome entertainment about bisexual alien hunters in Cardiff. And the miniseries, “Children of Earth” is one of the darkest most grim pieces of SF I’ve ever seen on television. Worth checking out.
Tiny Tim 11.13.09 at 5:49 pm
I didn’t think Torchwood worked very well overall, but Children of Earth is worth watching even if only as a standalone.
Doctor Memory 11.13.09 at 6:08 pm
John: the first season of Torchwood is pretty resolutely awful. “Countrycide” and “They Keep Killing Suzie” were really the only tolerable episodes of the entire lot. The rest ranged from lazy to actively atrocious, and episode 4, “Cyberwoman,” is hands-down the worst piece of televised SF I’ve seen in the last decade. (Yes, including the boxing episode of Battlestar Galactica.)
People who’s opinions I usually trust insist that Season Two and “Children of Earth” were much-improved, but the preponderance of episodes written by Chris Chibnall (“Cyberwoman”, passim) warned me away.
alex 11.13.09 at 6:11 pm
***Spoiler***
Except to end ‘CoE’ they basically reversed the polarity of the neutron flow, but added extra edgy by running it through the body of Jack’s grandson, whom we never knew existed until he was needed to provide a convenient and fatal conduit for their beam of handwavium… Dark, maybe, in the finest tradition of DW last-minute technobabble copout ending, absolutely.
Doctor Memory 11.13.09 at 6:11 pm
Oh, and despite having owned not one but two Tom Baker scarves as an extremely geeky adolescent, I’m going to risk my fanboy cred and say: Eccleston all the way. Excitable, prickly, wracked with survivor’s guilt, and alien to the core. “I’m the Doctor — now run for your life!” I like Tennant just fine, but I still wish Eccleston had given it a few more seasons. Oh well, Who’s loss was… GI Joe’s gain?
alex 11.13.09 at 6:12 pm
Y’know, there are probably those who’d say I know an awful lot about this for someone who only watches once every couple of years… hmmm…
chad 11.13.09 at 6:42 pm
My favorite Dr. Who episode is probably the one that featured The Doctor the least– Blink from Season 3. It seemed to me that the show really hit a stride in the middle of Season 3 that led to a number of great episodes– The Family of Blood stuff was pretty good too. Blink was just excellent, and I think good TV regardless of the show.
I never got into the show as a kid in the 1970s, and only started watching it again when Netflix made episodes from the Eccelston and Tennant years available for on-demand streaming.
Keith 11.13.09 at 8:46 pm
The Stephen Moffet episodes are by far the best of the new series. “The Empty Child/The Doctor Dances”, “Blink”, and the two-parter about the carnivorous shadow sin the library are all his and he’ll be the new show runner as of Season 5. Very excited and curious to see the Eleventh Doctor.
And there’s a special on this weekend. So that’ll be fun.
Russell Arben Fox 11.13.09 at 9:30 pm
Being an American, I know that there was, of course, only one Doctor, Tom Baker. That there have been other actors that have played The Doctor at different times in Britain strikes me as irrelevant.
dutchmarbel 11.13.09 at 9:58 pm
It used to be Tom Baker (might be the only one shown in the Netherlands) till the new series. Now, though I like tennant a lot, I have to vote for Chris Eccleston.
I know it is a kid series, but I actually saw a lot of the old episodes with my kids too (boys, currently 7, 9 and 11) and seeing it with kids just really adds to the fun – especially since they still hide behind the sofa.
soru 11.13.09 at 11:27 pm
Except to end ‘CoE’ they basically reversed the polarity of the neutron flow
The BBC does have a certain fondness for that plotline, for understandable reasons:
The British were ready for this system even before it was used. The Germans had chosen the operating frequency of the Wotan system very badly; it operated on 45 MHz, which just happened to be the frequency of the powerful-but-dormant BBC television transmitter at Alexandra Palace. All Jones had to do was arrange for the return signal to be received from the aircraft and sent it to Alexandra Palace for re-transmission. The combination of the two signals modified the phase shift — and the apparent transit delay.
Wesley 11.13.09 at 11:56 pm
My favorite Doctor is the specific version of Sylvester McCoy’s Doctor who appeared in a series of novels during the 1990s. After that, it’s Tom Baker and Christopher Eccleston.
I’m convinced that the character David Tennant is playing is not the Doctor at all, but another person of the same name.
Speaking of Doctor Who, there has been word that Michael Moorcock will be writing a Doctor Who novel.
mollymooly 11.14.09 at 12:39 am
We didn’t have Dr Who in Ireland in my childhood. I did see one episode of “Blake’s 7”. I have no plans to buy any “Blake’s 7” DVDs.
Dave Maier 11.14.09 at 2:20 am
I’m with Russell on this one, although I do like Mr Eccleston from other things.
As for the Pearl Harbor tune, it was nice enough — reminded me a bit of For Against, if you remember them — but droney? With chord changes and everything? Please. Andrew Chalk — now that’s drone [/Paul Hogan].
rea 11.14.09 at 2:22 am
I thought they were all the same Doctor . . .
Tim B 11.14.09 at 5:56 am
Keith wrote: “I’ve tried watching the older serials with the first 3 Doctors and they’re painfully slow and predictable, but that’s probably a side effect me being steeped in early 21st century visual media and they being from Mid 20th century visual media, when they were still figuring out how this whole thing worked.”
That’s an interesting perspective. So, mid-20th century visual media hadn’t figured out how this whole thing worked? Is it not possible that, in fact, “they” had figured out how this thing worked, and the 21st century has broken it? Are you claiming that somehow the 21st century has perfected plot and storytelling in TV, because if you are, I’d like to point you to about 1000 counterfactuals.
I happen to like Baker the best, followed by Pertwee, thanks to the above-mentioned age 8-13 factor. However, I have liked the little bits I’ve seen of Eccleston and Tennant’s versions.
alex 11.14.09 at 8:44 am
I think what Keith means is “now we all have the attention-span of a gnat, anything filmed before Star Wars looks like glaciers melting.” Tragically, he has a point, if not perhaps for the reason he thinks. It is very difficult to watch much pre-80s cinema without wondering why there are all these pointless shots of people walking around, staring out of windows, etc etc…
hellblazer 11.14.09 at 9:38 am
I notice Keith’s enthusiasm doesn’t stretch to getting Davison or Moffat’s names correct.
Oh, and although McCoy is “my” Doctor, I’d have to put in a vote for Eccleston. Anyway, I thought Doctor Who was just a book range spearheaded by Terrance Dicks until the mid 1980s. You mean it had a spin-off TV series? <ducks>
John Quiggin 11.14.09 at 10:23 am
I agree with Belle LeTriste at #1 and have to go for William Hartnell. Not quite as obvious an age giveaway as you might think – there was a long delay before Australian broadcast in those days.
Of later Docs, I endorse the common preference for Eccleston, although CTers should like Tennant also.
Nick Caldwell 11.14.09 at 11:30 am
I discover tonight via the Doctor Who News blog that, holy crap, Michael Moorcock is writing a Doctor Who novel, but “not a tie-in novel”. I think he’s taking “tie-in” to strictly mean “TV serial adaptation” which basically no-one does anymore. Sadly.
Timothy Burke 11.14.09 at 3:58 pm
I’m polymorphously perverse when it comes to Doctor preferences: Tom Baker, Eccleston, and Tennant are all very enjoyable, and I quite like what Pertwee and Troughton did as well. I like the darker idea of Sylvester McCoy’s Doctor as cosmic manipulator which peeked out here and there in his run (and clearly informs some of the reboot). It’s mostly about the quality of the stories: Moffat’s scripts for Tennant are pretty much my favorites in the entire history of the series, he pushes all the right buttons.
With the Eccleston/Tennant shows, about the only thing I get a bit tired of is Russell Davies’ particular form of soap-boxing on a running loop through too many stories. That got worse in Torchwood; even in Children of Earth, which was pretty excellent, there are some moments where it got tedious and predictable.
Barry Freed 11.14.09 at 6:13 pm
Despite having cut my teeth on Tom Baker and having a fondness for David Tennant’s volubility I have to second what Doc Memory said above:
“Eccleston all the way. Excitable, prickly, wracked with survivor’s guilt, and alien to the core. “
Medrawt 11.14.09 at 8:07 pm
As someone who’s only seen the Eccleston and Tennant Doctors, I admire and am sometimes wondrous at how the best episodes of those seasons manage to seem totally enjoyable for kids (or at least the kids in my head) while engaging me as an adult (the farting Slitheen, not so much, or at least not until the callback a few episodes later). But the real reason I watch is because every few episodes leaves me emotionally ravaged; is that the sort of thing one can also get from the earlier Doctors, or are they more “campy entertainment/all-aboard-the-Fun-Train” style? Admitting that I am the sort of modern Philistine who sometimes struggles to stay engaged with older visual entertainments, am I going to get out of Tom Baker episodes what I get out of “The Doctor Dances” or the episode with Madame Pompadour or the Family Blood two-parter?
Pix 11.14.09 at 10:18 pm
Medrawt: 1970s TV drama was less hyperactive than now, and the special effects could be somewhat ropey; but try “Genesis of the Daleks” and see how you find it. If the answer is a bit campy and lighthearted , you needn’t investigate the backlist any further.
Pete Baker 11.14.09 at 11:01 pm
As others may have said, until the return it was Tom Baker for me, with Peter Davidson and Pertwee sharing second place.
But since then, although Tennant has taken over first spot the writing has, on occasion, let him down – not helped by Catherine Tate’s involvement, although that might have been coincidental. ‘Blink’ was a noteable high point. And, among other episodes, I thoroughly enjoyed the 57 Shakespearean academics punching the air.
Which leaves the unfulfilled potential of Ecclestone as a couldhavebeen contender – too short a run to tell.
As for Torchwood, although enjoyable it never quite seemed to have the courage of its convictions, but Children of Earth is definitely worth a look.
Phil 11.14.09 at 11:01 pm
The other thing about Dr Who:TOS is that a story consisted of four (occasionally six) 25-minute episodes rather than one (occasionally two) at 45 minutes. So it was rare, statistically speaking, for the episode you were watching to finish with a big emotional slam-bang, and normal for it to finish with a horribly contrived cliffhanger. Which does work, at least for part of the audience. I remember watching the Troughton & Pertwee Doctors and genuinely puzzling over some of those cliffhangers – Will the Doctor and/or the Doctor’s companion get out of this one alive? Well, obviously they will, but how? But I was fairly young at the time.
(My family lived in a Forces town for most of the Pertwee period, and on Saturday afternoons we used to go and watch the colour TV at the Officers’ Mess. As a result I shall always associate Jon Pertwee with Basil Brush, snooker, orange squash with soda water, and 1970s Playboys (the Mess had a subscription and my mother used to read the articles when she didn’t think I was looking). Proust, Schmoust.)
nick s 11.15.09 at 12:47 am
The Stephen Moffat episodes are by far the best of the new series.
Indeed, and as someone for whom Press Gang came along at just the right time, I’m glad to see him take over the helm.
Keith 11.15.09 at 1:58 am
alex @28:
I think what Keith means is “now we all have the attention-span of a gnat, anything filmed before Star Wars looks like glaciers melting.â€
No, what I mean is that visual story-telling techniques have advanced quite a bit in 40 years and contemporary audiences are used to more information per frame, so a lot (but not all) older movies and TV shows feel like they move like molasses because the information per frame ratio is a lot smaller. They linger on details a lot longer, spend more time establishing setting where we use shorthand techniques to expedite story telling. There’s also the fact that audiences are more familiar with the dominant story telling tropes. We use pop culture references as a shorthand language layered on top of long form thematic story telling techniques to tell meta stories and build in commentary.
Matt McIrvin 11.15.09 at 2:35 am
Pix: I don’t know, I like a lot of the old serials but “Genesis of the Daleks” actually leaves me cold. From the Tom Baker era, my favorites are the ones that pull crazy nonsensical stunts with pop-science tropes, like “The Pirate Planet” and “Logopolis”. And, for some reason, the Hartnell serial “The Dalek Invasion of Earth” is better than all the other original-series Dalek stories; the Daleks are actually scary in it.
I guess the Doctor I first saw as a child was technically Jon Pertwee, since I saw a bit of one of the Auton stories (it may have been “Spearhead from Space”, the very first serial to be broadcast on PBS stations in the US) and got so disturbed by the way the mannequins’ hands opened up to reveal guns that I didn’t watch Doctor Who again for many years. The Doctor himself didn’t really make an impression on me at that point.
But I think my favorite Doctors are actually Patrick Troughton and Christopher Eccleston.
Matt McIrvin 11.15.09 at 2:40 am
…Though, true, if you’re not emotionally ravaged by “Genesis of the Daleks” the other Baker serials probably aren’t going to do it either. “The Dalek Invasion of Earth” actually might; oddly, Doctor Who often felt grimmer and heavier during the era when it was officially supposed to be a kids’ show.
John Holbo 11.15.09 at 3:05 am
“the Daleks are actually scary in it.”
True.
Timothy Burke 11.15.09 at 3:10 am
The first Dr. Who I saw as a kid rebroadcast on a PBS station was Perwee’s “Inferno”: I found it quite frightening in a delicious, weird sort of way, which was partly the script, partly the acting, partly the look (even the cheesiness) of the BBC sets of that era. It didn’t look like anything else I was watching, and that alone was enough to make it special, but add to that the oddness of the character, the tension of the script, and so on, and it was quite captivating. I didn’t see each and every episode from there on, because it was on late on weekends, but I saw quite a few late Pertwees and early Bakers…I remember vividly Pyramids of Mars and The Talons of Weng Chiang in particular.
Pix 11.15.09 at 3:47 pm
Matt, I don’t disagree, but while you and I might be able to forgive – or even embrace – the notion of a space pirate with a robot parrot on his shoulder, I can appreciate that some people may find it unserious rather than the original definition of freakin awesome.
Similarly, DIE is indeeed fantastic, but I read “struggles to stay engaged with older visual entertainments” and figured there was no point recommending anything in black and white. Baby steps.
NomadUK 11.15.09 at 4:16 pm
I think what Keith means is “now we all have the attention-span of a gnat, anything filmed before Star Wars looks like glaciers melting.â€
No, what I mean is […] contemporary audiences are used to more information per frame, so a lot (but not all) older movies and TV shows […] linger on details a lot longer, spend more time establishing setting where we use shorthand techniques to expedite story telling.
In other words, contemporary audiences have the attention span of a gnat. Who needs lingering? Who needs details? Get on with it, man; let’s get to that surprise twist at the end!
belle le triste 11.15.09 at 5:20 pm
Today everything is available for re-viewing, and if you enjoyed it likely to be multiply re-viewed, hence more detail can be packed in without risk — there’s far more detail in today’s Who; lots of jokes and hints and foretastes that you’ll only decode several episodes later: by contrast there’s a swathe of early Doctor Who that has entirely vanished from the world, because it never occurred to the BBC that people would want to re-watch at some time; also there were a surprising number of “nothing really happens” episodes.
Medrawt 11.15.09 at 8:33 pm
I’m not a scholar of either film or TV history, but actually I generally find that my attention span is most an issue not with stuff from the black and white era, but from the late 60s and 70s. Casablanca is good, Mean Streets bores me (I know, I know, I’m ducking the lightning bolt).
John Quiggin 11.15.09 at 10:21 pm
I can remember being really scared by the way the Dalek raygun zapped victims into negative. I guess that only works with B&W.
hellblazer 11.15.09 at 11:21 pm
While the comment above about “information per frame” sounds plausible, I’d just like to throw out the notion that some of the older stuff has less stuff but more weight. You can argue that nothing much happens in any given 2-minute segment of “Twelve Angry Men”, but arguably a lot more is happening – in the viewer’s imagination – than when Matt Damon throttles/strangles/asphyxiates in some way someone with a book. And I quite liked that Bourne movie; but it’s just different, neither better nor worse than the filmed play that is TAM.
Compare Raging Bull with Goodfellas, for a less strained example perhaps.
hellblazer 11.15.09 at 11:32 pm
Y’know, I quite like the illusion that I’m watching characters, from time to time; it’s the deviations from or riffs on the trope that are worth watching. Reducing Die Hard to a list of its tropes rather diminishes the craft of that film, in my view. (Of course, there’s good/enjoyable film-making that is almost all tropes; I’m just trying to make the case that watching older things should be more than just going “oh yes, Plot Device #163 on the list”.)
And to be vaguely on topic: I have very little experience of pre 1980s televised DW, but presumably one will only get something out of it if one is willing, to some extent, to accept it on its own terms.
mart 11.16.09 at 6:35 pm
Did anyone else catch the new episode last night? I thought it was pretty good, but the different side shown by the Doctor at the end would have been better had it been introduced as a way forward earlier in the Tennant years, IMO.
Link to Guardian Review (contains spoilers).
mds 11.17.09 at 2:47 am
Ahem.
“Don’t you think she looks tired?” (from “The Christmas Invasion”)
and,
“‘Because sometimes you need someone to stop you.” (from “The Runaway Bride”)
And those are just a couple of examples. Davies scripted it in too heavy-handed a manner, as has all-too-frequently been the case for him, but there’s been an undercurrent of it all along.
mart 11.17.09 at 4:11 am
an undercurrent, yes, but I think a few episodes/ 1 series of him going a bit power-mad would have been an interesting conceit, instead of merely hinting a few times but not following through. Can’t say I’ll be too sorry to see Davis leave the show really – his scripts have always seemed overwrought.
alex 11.17.09 at 8:07 am
Meanwhile: tiny robot suddenly grows rocket-propulsion after DW pokes it with sonic screwdriver = kids’ show! The fact that this can happen in the same episode as a major character shooting herself just to preserve a timeline opens interesting questions about what exactly ‘kids’ are supposed to be thinking about all this.
belle le triste 11.17.09 at 11:00 am
science fiction is the one kids’ genre where largescale death has always been acceptable: since the decline of the western anyway
one of the things i like about RTD is that he takes the present-day ultra-conundrum of “watched by kids of all ages” seriously as a nut to be cracked, even if his attempts to crack it often go rawther awry
Sock Puppet of the Great Satan 11.17.09 at 3:48 pm
‘I discover tonight via the Doctor Who News blog that, holy crap, Michael Moorcock is writing a Doctor Who novel, but “not a tie-in novelâ€.’
Wow! The Doctor’s going to get a “Drain Soul” attachment for his Sonic Screwdriver.
“I can remember being really scared by the way the Dalek raygun zapped victims into negative. I guess that only works with B&W.”
I remember hiding behind the sofa for the Pertwee Giant Fly story (the Green Death, which I guess was around the time of Love Canal), and Planet of the Spiders. Scary Baker ones were the Ark of Space, Pyramids of Mars, Robots of Death, and Image of the Fendahl, and Robot. Thought the Key of Time cycle was awesome, and the Planet Makers (where everything was run by a corporation) great satire.
Odd thing is, the kid loves Doctor Who and the original Star Trek, even as I’m wincing through the plot holes and crap special effects.
maidhc 11.18.09 at 5:23 am
The first Doctor I saw was Tom Baker, and the first episode I saw him in was his first episode, “The Giant Robot” (not one of the best). He’s still one of my favourite Doctors, and my other favourite from the first run was Sylvester McCoy, but unfortunately he didn’t get enough time to really develop his character. I like the new shows, but since I only see them over the air in the US I’m a couple of seasons behind.
I have seen every show still extant from the first series, and I still think that one of the very best single episodes was the very first show “An Unearthly Child” from 1963. Despite the dialogue and acting not being the best, it managed to achieve a truly creepy unsettling quality seldom equalled in later decades.
Timothy Burke 11.18.09 at 8:35 pm
Mart:
Just consider what the Tennant Doctor does to The Family of Blood in “Human Nature” & “The Family of Blood”: he pretty much traps them in torments for all eternity, with an unmistakeably cruel and power-driven mood to that resolution. I think this has been a pretty consistent part of this characterization.
David 11.21.09 at 4:29 am
Well, I’ll ignore the jibe(s) about a favorite Doctor being an artifact of childhood, as I came to the show entirely unaware (oh happiest of channel surfing accidents) and discovered that Tom Baker Dr Who was the reason television was invented. Sylvester McCoy gets my second place nod.
Zeba 11.21.09 at 12:41 pm
I was a cusp Dr Who person, catching the last few Pertwee episodes, but mostly dominated by Baker as Who. Given that Dr Who was the only children’s TV I was ever allowed to see at my school, I enjoyed it hugely, but I have much preferred modern Dr Who in terms of plot and characterisation. I enjoyed the storylines for the Eccleston Dr, but I didn’t like Eccleston himself, who girned terribly. Tennant has been wonderful mainly because there is a really edgy darkness about his character, as those who saw this week’s special The Water of Mars, will have encountered. Can’t wait for Christmas specials with John Sims as the Master brought back.
Comments on this entry are closed.