I heard a rumour that London IT professionals have selected the pub where they will meet when the internet goes down.
It is apocalyptic thinking, perhaps, but it also feels plausible. Though the internet feels permanent, stable and sufficiently distributed to seem impervious to target, this infrastructure that underpins our daily work and life is strikingly vulnerable. Undersea cables get damaged; phone and cable systems go down; and software is frequently corrupted or hacked.
A backup plan is sensible. It matters because they might be the only ones who know how to rebuild the internet – and they need a way to contact one another.
Perhaps we also need a pub at the end of the university?

Image: I asked ChatGPT to create a picture of scholars in a pub during the apocalypse. I see chatty didn’t think there would be any women.
The End of the University?
I don’t seriously believe that the university will end any time soon. Though I do think that they have been very seriously weakened and are not presently up to the tasks that confront higher education now, which might almost amount the same thing.
Coming home to roost in universities around the world are the consequences of unbearable austerity, especially in relation to teaching, matched only by unforgivable profligacy by (and for the benefit of) a managerial class. Under their watch, and following two decades of unprecedented and exponential enrolment growth, some universities are at risk of bankruptcy, while others are cutting staff at a rate that bears no resemblance to any decline in the importance of university teaching or research. I hear that 15,000 academics have lost their jobs in the UK, just this year.
Things in universities are not great in other ways, either. Study is burdensome rather than enlivening. Teaching is performed under conditions that make it impossible. Research is measured in ways that interfere with its direction and undermine its pleasures. Management, sometimes but not only in response to governments trying to ensure management are doing what they were paid for, in turn impose so many compliance and performance measures on teachers, researchers and professional staff that it is getting hard to get much done at all.
Sustained attacks from the far right, who fear places where young people might be exposed to ideas that threaten their narrow, nasty world view, have destabilised the possibilities for a tertiary system that seeks a more equal, more inclusive world. Their alignment with powerful capitalist interests is obvious in 2025: and so too is university management’s, every time they relinquish ground.
This means that at the very moment that environmental catastrophe, energy transitions, and threats to the discernment of truth (via multiple vectors: AI, geopolitical, social media-radicalism, conspiracy-theory populism, incel and cooker self-promotion) let alone massive industry demands for the skills universities produce (yes in HASS too), these glorious and flawed institutions are sadly crippled.
The Work is Amazing
And yet, amazing work is still being produced. You really see it working for government. Lots of applied and theoretical work on nearly every issue emanates from universities. It is incredibly useful. Want to know about the economics or logistics issues related to the housing crisis? The cost of living crisis? Want to understand the teaching shortage? Need a philosophical framework for men performing care work? Want to consider the value of emotional labour? Concerned about the current state of democracy? Need ideas for reforming…pretty much anything, really? It is all there, though the system is clearly teetering, students may not be learning – or worse, having any fun – and the best intellectual talent is being pushed out. 15,000+, good lord.
Universities provide the fundamental infrastructure for decision-making in industry and government. And they provide the tools for bolstering democracy – indeed, this was what the systems we have inherited from the post-war moment were largely for. They are precious and amazing places, and being able to do that work is a gift – if you can get it done under excessive managerial surveillance, which fundamentally inhibits creativity.
It is great to do this in a university because good thinking, like most good work, is best done with other people. It is all very well for me to read, take notes, listen to podcasts and write my ideas. But those ideas are so much better when I also talk about them over drinks, in seminars and conferences, or in the corridor. This is also why for decades universities kept class sizes small enough to ensure all these new and emerging thinkers had opportunity to talk, listen, debate and (re)consider what they thought they knew. It is just not possible for all 30 (or 60!) members of a tutorial to speak, so we know that few get that experience any more.
It is a particularly tragic loss when academic staff are pushed out of the spaces where this work happens. Every one of the approximately 15,000 lost academics in the UK was producing work, teaching students, and engaging with the industries and communities that inspired or will use their work. But now they are not. We mourn their loss.
The message as always is that it is not your fault. It was (mis)management. And management has to go, not the academic and professional staff doing the work.
We don’t need them. But we do need you.
Academia and Identity
This is a problem for those whose identities are fundamentally entangled with higher education. Many academics feel singularly unequipped for any other job (I don’t believe this is true, but it certainly feels that way for many). More, they trained so hard, for so long, sacrificed so many things and loved their work so deeply that the grief associated with losing a place in the academy seems unbearable.
This was partly why management and their metrics can wield fear like a sniper on the roof. Fear inhibits good work, but it also increases managerial power. I can hardly express how wonderful it is to shed it.
It was much harder, however, to relinquish my identity as an academic. That is still a work in progress, truthfully.
It is hard to leave a cult.
But also. Academia is a cult
A thousand subliminal messages tell us that good scholarship and hierarchical academic esteem are co-dependent. RF Kuang’s Katabasis captures it well. The main characters are prepared to relinquish half of the days they have left to live for a shot at academia. They regularly say they would ‘rather die’ than leave the university. Being and feeling included in the ‘life of the mind’, she has her characters observe, requires an academic job (IRL conversations people in my world just refer to it as ‘a job’ as if it is the only kind).
“Oh, he took a job in industry”, they would say, as if “industry” here was a euphemism like a farm for old sick dogs. And they said it with a kind, patronizing lilt that betrayed what they truly meant: alt academia meant failure.

Image from RF Kuang’s Katabasis including above quote.
To be frank, this is bullshit.
An upside is that fewer people ask you to complete the worst of the academic chores.4
I hope in time that scholars in and out of the system see that good scholars and intellectuals – 15,000+ in the UK alone – may work outside of the university, but are still colleagues in every other sense.5
Indeed, given the state of the world, it might actually be transformative to have such high quality, well-trained thinkers becoming embedded in a wider range of workplaces and communities – without losing engagement with their scholarly colleagues and disciplinary organisations (unless they choose that ofc). And that work will in turn inform and transform scholarship in valuable ways.
We should fix universities, of course. To do that we mostly need the managerial class to get out of the way. They are not keen on losing this power and some are even talking about taking a pay cut so they can stay in control.6
The pub at the end of the university
More importantly, the weakened state of the universities surely compels us to consider what might be our ‘pub’ where we meet to rebuild intellectual life as the university goes down.
Even though the university won’t exactly ‘go down’ in the way the internet might, it just may not be in a good position to face the challenges this emerging phase of f*cking capitalism looks likely to throw at us.
At the pub at the end of the university, away from managerial surveillance and control, we might really start to build something that is democratic in purpose and structure – actively inclusive, boldly truthful and protective of democratic systems, engaged with people, communities and workplaces in ways that are creative and enlivening. Transforming and rebuilding the world with ideas.
{ 10 comments }
engels 12.03.25 at 12:08 pm
To be frank, this is bullshit.
I think Adorno put it well:
PRW 12.04.25 at 3:43 am
I assume the university lot will migrate back to their origin at Bologna.
Lameen 12.04.25 at 8:12 am
In theory, there’s an obvious answer to where to find this ‘pub’: learned societies. I my own domain (linguistics), you don’t have to be part of any university to join the Philological Society or the Société Linguistique de Paris or for that matter the Linguistic Society of America, and the dues are not onerous. It’s a model that in many cases predates the professionalisation of the fields in question, so there can be little doubt about its ability to survive the decline of universities. The question is how to scale that model up for an age where far more people are potential members – local branches? More online events?
SusanC 12.04.25 at 1:24 pm
Internet service providers do have plans for what to do in the event of various kinds of disaster; they have plans for some fairly alarming (hopefully unlikely) disasters.
Cesar Lima 12.04.25 at 3:44 pm
I dropped from a PhD program eight years ago when a funding crisis hit Brazil and it became clear it would be very tough to find a position. Over the years I’ve seen my friends also slowly dropping, be it after completing their PhD or some years as postdocs. And everybody agrees, life is much nicer outside, in the sense that we actually have time for hobbies and leisure, and not fret constantly about needing to write more papers, deal with reviewers, and not be able to have long term plans. To de fair, I really miss the “having coffee and spending two hours discussing abstract stuff”, the intellectual intercourse I had during the PhD was awesome. And sometimes when I meet my friends we find ourselves chatting about the old stuff. The university still goes on, but the pub at the end of my university is blogs like these, where I seldom comment, but daily read. Maybe not yet a proper pub, but surely a republic of letters.
The quote from Kuang’s book resonated a lot with my past self. Maybe it’s me just coping, but I think a marxist analysis of the “class consciousness of the intellectual elite who find some kinds of work not worth doing” just writes itself. Or if you’re of Nietzschean persuasion, just tack some comments on ascetic ideals.
Lastly, yes, f*ck management.
Adam Hammond 12.05.25 at 4:45 pm
Brilliant. Thanks. I am energized to pursue a side project for an off-campus faculty salon. And now I will call it the Restaurant at the end of the University.
David Mitchell 12.05.25 at 11:52 pm
If folks really want to meet following a collapse of the internet they may want to consider getting amateur radio licenses and related radios in addition to identifying a pub as a meeting place. A downed internet implies downed cell phone service and likely messed up transportation networks. Meeting on air would provide a means of coordinating a recovery assuming it’s possible.
somebody who stood on the land granted 12.07.25 at 12:55 am
It took around 150 years for the universities around where I live to become what they were when I attended (desegregated, highly specialized, technically proficient, integrated into the community, a thing of great celebration); I suspect it will take at least that long for them to be what they were again, if not longer. I won’t see it and neither will anyone here.
JPL 12.07.25 at 1:26 am
This is an important problem , deserving a lot of further discussion. One of the central influences in the “enshittification” of the university is the fact that universities now provide a lucrative opportunity for those who are mainly interested in making a lot of money to make a lot of money. As the rebel professor who resigned from Harvard proclaimed in response to his (probably cult-following) female student, who shouted incredulously, as they hit the road on their Harleys, “You had it all! Why do you want to throw it all away?”, “Harvard Schmarvard! It’s only a hedge fund with an educational arm as a tax dodge!” In other words, the developing ethos of the money grubbers toward the educational arm they find themselves running can be characterized technically as “fundamentally unserious”. But also the modern conduct of scientific research now requires a lot of money and infrastructure, and we’ve seen that in the recent conflicts over government funding.
I want to recall that the historian of science George Sarton, in his Introduction to the History of Science (1927) identified the central endeavour of the university as the pursuit of pure inquiry, which involves the essential separation of the pursuit of truth, including effective knowledge of the world and the arts, from the vagaries of practical application, even at the beginning understood as an emerging military-industrial complex, and judged this separation of the pathways of cognitive work to be a watershed moment in the history of science and human intellectual evolution. He also described the type of personal outlook that would define the ethos of pure inquiry as “the enthusiasts”, as opposed to “the job-holders”, who are the conventional minded. The problem is that the modern student body consists of a lot of people who are mainly concerned with entering the rat race, as opposed to the relatively few driven by the intellectual passions, and again so much money is on the line wrt tuition, boarding, etc. for the privilege of the university experience. Ideally there should be no (or at least not so much) money involved for anybody who wants to pursue understanding.
Pure inquiry in the true sense is almost impossible in the private sector; its protected haven should be the university. The permanent ad hoc committee meeting at the pub is great, but we’re going to need someplace for teaching, and meanwhile the invading management drones have occupied all our buildings. Even though tradition is an important part of any university, what we need now is a new university as a new model for the pursuit of understanding, science and the arts, under the ideals governing truth-seeking, paid for by everybody, free for anybody. (I know, “good luck with that”, you say.)
Tm 12.08.25 at 8:48 am
“some are even talking about taking a pay cut so they can stay in control”
I’m intrigued, what are you alluding to?
Comments on this entry are closed.