Easy-Titles

by John Holbo on October 14, 2010

Must be something in the water. Just as Henry draws our attention to short books, I see AbeBooks is highlighting books with single-letter titles. I could take this as an occasion to mock-deplore the twitterifictation (twitterfaction?) of literature. But life’s too short.

{ 14 comments }

1

eddie 10.14.10 at 12:53 am

Possibly twitrefaction.

2

John Holbo 10.14.10 at 1:03 am

Better, but that’s still 13 characters.

3

piglet 10.14.10 at 1:09 am

Off-topic for a topic suggestion. Am I alone on being regularly baffled by the outright bizarre treatment of matters European in the New York Times? This was published Monday:

Weeks after giving birth, French women are offered a state-paid, extended course of vaginal gymnastics, complete with personal trainer, electric stimulation devices and computer games that reward particularly nimble squeezing. The aim, said Agnes de Marsac, a physiotherapist who runs such sessions: “Making love again soon and making more babies.”

So that is what French women are paid to do? And Americans buy that?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/12/world/europe/12iht-fffrance.html

4

John Holbo 10.14.10 at 1:13 am

Truly this is a threadjack for the ages, piglet. (I don’t really mind because I doubt there’s that much to be said about single letter book titles.)

5

praisegod barebones 10.14.10 at 5:13 am

I see that under 2 letter titles, ABE has listed books named ‘We’ by Charles Lindbergh and John Dickinson; but not the book of the same name by Yevgeny Zamyatin which predates both.

6

Kirk Ahrens 10.14.10 at 5:37 am

Yay, V and Y!

7

GeoX 10.14.10 at 6:36 am

V is in fact V. (with a period). Shouldn’t that count against it?

8

Pete 10.14.10 at 10:33 am

I’d just like to put in a personal reccomendation for the film of Z; it’s a political thriller that manages to convey very well the fear and confusion of street political gatherings on the brink of riot.

9

Brainz 10.14.10 at 12:35 pm

I can’t believe that no one has written I.

10

Phil 10.14.10 at 1:17 pm

G and C are both formally experimental Bildungsroman…s (Bildungsromänner?) What are the odds?

I also noticed the absence of the Story of O, but I suppose that doesn’t count.

11

Shelley 10.14.10 at 5:18 pm

They’re all “I.”

12

dr ngo 10.14.10 at 5:55 pm

Since I may be the only one who has read it, let me put in a good word for “M” by John Sack. It d0cuments a company (M Company, 2d battalion, 1st brigade, if memory serves) of US Army draftees through training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and on into Vietnam ca. 1967. As it happens, I went through Fort Dix the next year, in what I believe would have been the next company over (N? but they had renumbered the system by then), and I found it scrupulously accurate as to the training experience. I don’t know about the VN part – never got there, thank goodness – but I am convinced that Sack is an honest documentarian and skillful writer. If you’re interested in what it was like, trust him.

13

Salient 10.14.10 at 6:29 pm

Shouldn’t that count against it?

Maybe, but not in the AbeBooks sense, because they accepted e^2^ as a one-letter title.

14

piglet 10.14.10 at 6:49 pm

John, it wasn’t meant as a threadjack but as a serious topic suggestion that I thought was relevant for CT and there was no other place to post it. Maybe CT prefers to be a one-way exchange.

Comments on this entry are closed.