“Cosmic Variance”:http://cosmicvariance.com/ is a new group blog made up of a bunch of physicists, some of whom — notably “Sean Carroll”:http://cosmicvariance.com/sean/ — are already “well-known”:http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/ for their writing. I used to hang out with a bunch of physicists in college. Never have so many smart people been concentrated in such a brutal job market. On the other hand, they get to have good job titles and cool-sounding research interests. I mean, who wouldn’t want to be in the “Theory Group at Stanford Linear Accelerator”:http://cosmicvariance.com/joanne/ studying “heavy flavor physics”? “Today we will accelerate a particle of this 1989 Château Haut-Brion to very high speeds and smash it into a stationary matrix composed of this bar of “Michel Cluizel”:http://www.cluizel.com/ single-plantation chocolate, in an effort to produce an entity predicted by Larousse but hitherto unobserved, the Michelin 4-star boson.”
{ 9 comments }
Ian Whitchurch 07.18.05 at 6:32 pm
Not goanna happen. The Stanford rig gets you to a substantial fraction of C, and thats fast, and there is no way in hell the Michelin people are goanna give four stars to fast food.
Andrew 07.18.05 at 6:34 pm
When I worked for an electron microscope maker I used to listen to discussions like that all the time. The odd thing about physicists is that many believe they are much better capable at solving problems in other fields than those working in those fields. I would hear about how dim Material Scientists were, how Economics would be massively more simple if it weren’t for economists (which actually makes sense, but not in the way they intended it), and how Mathematicians would give awards for work Physicists would later prove irrelavent. I don’t even want to get into what they would say about computer scientists (still hurts). I was so depressed by the end of the whole thing I was extatic to work in software again. Now I miss the lunch conversations quite a bit (lunch conversations in the software industry are far too work and money oriented) so hopefully cosmic variance can fill the void a bit. Seems good so far! Thanks for the link.
engels 07.18.05 at 7:59 pm
I don’t care how many stars Michelin gives it – I’m not eating that.
greensmile 07.18.05 at 8:45 pm
Thanks!…seriously. I can’t get slashdot to post bits that contain actual physics knowledge and require educated physicists for intelligent comment.
Tad Brennan 07.18.05 at 8:50 pm
“an entity predicted by Larousse but hitherto unobserved”
You surely must be alluding to the bon mot (bonne bouche?) of the chef Brillat-Savarin:
“The discovery of a new dish does more for the happiness of mankind than the discovery of a star”.
(Nice to imagine someone being a Platonist about cookery, i.e. the dish was really out there, mind-independent, just waiting for us to discover it. What is it to *discover* a new dish? To discover a fact about the human palate? Well, parts of that are mind-independent, I suppose….)
bad Jim 07.19.05 at 2:37 am
I hate to keep paddling the thread in this direction, but there are some new dishes out there in the neighborhood of Barcelona:
In a number of endeavors it’s difficult to separate discovery from invention. Just thinking about it gives me a hadron.
Branedy 07.19.05 at 3:50 am
When I used to work at SRI International, I used to lunch with the odd folks there and was always amused by their ability to truly say “Why Yes!, I am a Rocket Scientist”. Very funny. I really miss the disscussions there. Thanks for the link.
Sean 07.19.05 at 8:26 am
Sure, one might get the impression that theoretical physics is all about solving equations over meals at four-star restaurants and discussing signatures of extra spatial dimensions during tours of Napa vinyards. But keep in mind, there are also the constant travel to exotic locations and the endless pestering by paparazzi. We suffer for those exorbitant salaries we get, I assure you.
anon 07.20.05 at 3:30 pm
“Never have so many smart people been concentrated in such a brutal job market.”
How true. In college (Ivy), I realized that I wasn’t smart enough to keep up with the rest of the physics department. Between that and changing interests, I switched to another technical department and instantly became very good.
“The odd thing about physicists is that many believe they are much better capable at solving problems in other fields than those working in those fields.”
Equally true. I never figured out what amazed me more about physicists – the concentration of brains, or the intellectual arrogance.
Comments on this entry are closed.