I’ve held off posting this in the hope of coming up with some kind of positive response, but I haven’t got one.
When I wrote back in November 2024 that Trump’s dictatorship was a fait accompi there was still plenty of room for people to disagree. But (with the exception of an announced state of emergency) it’s turned out far worse than I thought possible.
Opposition politicians and judges have been arrested for doing their jobs, and many more have been threatened. The limited resistance of the courts has been effectively halted by the Supreme Court’s decision ending nationwide injunctions. University leaders have been forced to comply or quit. The press has been cowed into submission by the threat of litigation or harm to corporate owners. Political assassinations are laughed about and will soon become routine. With the use of troops to suppress peaceful protests, and the open support of Trump and his followers, more deaths are inevitable, quite possibly on a scale not seen since the Civil War.
The idea that this process might be stopped by a free and fair election in 2026 or 2028 is absurdly optimistic. Unless age catches up with him, Trump will appoint himself as President for life, just as Xi and Putin have done.
None of this is, or at least ought to be, news. Yet the political implications are still being discussed in the familiar terms of US party politics: swing voters, the centre ground, mobilisation versus moderation, rehashes of the 2024 election and so on. Having given up hope, I have no interest in these debates. Instead, I want to consider the implications for the idea of democracy.
The starting point is the observation that around half of all US voters at the last three elections have supported a corrupt, incompetent, criminal racist and rapist, while another third or more of US citizens have failed to vote at all. And Trump’s support has not been diminished to any significant extent (if at all) by his actions since returning to power.
Any claims that might be made to exonerate Trump’s voters or mitigate the crime they have committed don’t stand up to scrutiny. The US did not face any kind of crisis that might justify such an extreme outcome (as, for example, Germany did in 1933). Unemployment was at historically low levels. The short-lived inflation resulting from the pandemic was well below the rates of the late 20th century, crime was far below those rates. And so on. The only real driving factor was the resentment and hatred felt by Trump’s voters for large groups of their compatriots.
One part of this is fear of immigrants, particularly but not exclusively, asylum seekers and other undocumented immigrants. But this fear has long been a winning issue for the political right, in many countries including Australia. It has not produced anything like the turn to dictatorship we have now seen in the US.
In this context what matters is not the marginal groups of swinging voters who have absorbed so much attention: the “left behind”, the “manosphere” and so on. It’s the fact that comfortably off, self-described “conservative”, white suburbanites, historically the core of the Republican base, have overwhelmingly voted for, and welcomed, the end of American democracy.
This is something that, as far as I can tell, is unprecedented in the history of modern democracy, and threatens the basic assumptions on which democracy is built. While the last 200 years of modern (partial or complete) democracy have seen plenty of demagoguery, authoritarian populism and so on, these have invariably been temporary eruptions rejected, relatively quickly, by an enduring democratic majority. The idea that a party that has been part of the constitutional fabric of a major democracy for more than 150 years, would abandon democracy and keep the support of its voters was inconceivable. That’s why so many have refused to admit it, even to themselves.
Nothing lasts forever, but there is no obvious way back from dictatorship for the US. Viewed in retrospect, the the Republican party was a deadly threat to US democracy from the moment of Trump’s nomination in 2016 and certainly after the 2021 insurrection.
With the benefit of hindsight, Biden might have declared a state of emergency immediately after the insurrection, arrested Trump, and expelled all the congressional Republicans who had voted to overturn the election. But this would itself have represented an admission that democratic norms had failed. It was far more comfortable to suppose that Trump had been an aberration and that those norms would prevail as they had done at previous moments of crisis. That is no longer possible.
As I siad, I’ve held off posting this in the hope of coming up with some kind of positive response, but I haven’t got one. The best I can put forward is that the US, founded on slavery, has never been able to escape its original sin, and is unique in that respect. Every country has its original sin and a dominant group with its racist core. But only in the US (so far) has that core secured unqualified majority support. The downfall of American democracy should serve as a warning. For conservative parties, flirting with fascism is a deal with the devil that must be avoided. For the left, the nostalgic appeal of the “white working class” (implicitly male and mostly old) should not tempt us into pandering to racist and misogynist reaction.
I don’t know whether that will be enough to save us. At least in Australia, Trumpism is political poison. But until we understand that Trumpism is not an aberration but the course Americans have chosen, we will not be able to free ourselves from our past allegiance to an idea which is now an illusion.
{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }
Adam Hammond 06.29.25 at 11:08 pm
Well said. I also understand that the point of no return was some time ago. Presumably that is a debate for the future. Perhaps it was the suppression of Garland’s Supreme Court nomination. I hope that history finds Mitch McConnell to be the tragic villain of the end of American democracy.
The beginning is John Wilkes Booth. I believe that Lincoln’s plan for the aftermath of the civil war would have set us on the path to atone for the original sins of slavery and genocide of native people. Instead we turned the army west, and we allowed the lost cause narrative to set up shop. There is a solid line of generational descent, from southern men, angry at the end of slavery; folks who have worked tirelessly through segregation, prison labor, Jim Crow, red lining, lynching, forced sterilization, white flight, urban renewal, war on drugs, mass incarceration, school choice, and starve the beast. These dedicated Americans have worked tirelessly to bring us to this point.
It is ironic that Booth’s beef with Lincoln seems to have been the abuse of executive power.
dk 06.30.25 at 12:06 am
I see it in just the opposite way. Democratic norms are upheld when democracy resists fascist insurrection, as in Brazil or South Korea. Once Biden decided to duck the issue, it was clear that democratic norms were not going to be relevant going forward. In this case, it’s pragmatic (though morally revolting) to support the winning side.
dk 06.30.25 at 12:14 am
Trump’s popular vote was 31.8% of eligible voters, Harris’s was 30.8%. This does not strike me as “unqualified majority support”.
gyrate 06.30.25 at 12:21 am
oh dear! i hope trump doesn’t win again in 2028! ????????
LFC 06.30.25 at 2:33 am
I agree with the view expressed by S. Levitsky in this interview from March: the U.S. has descended into a form of authoritarianism, but it is not irreversible. The amount of opposition to Trump has in some respects increased since that interview was given, and the result in the recent NYC mayoral primary is one hopeful sign. That’s not to deny that things are v. grim and will remain so for quite a while, but they have not passed a permanently irreversible point.
Alex SL 06.30.25 at 3:46 am
Yes, the idea that the next two elections will be legitimate opportunities for unseating Republicans is naive. Given all that they have done and got away with so far that is illegal, nakedly corrupt, and unconstitutional, there is no reason to believe that they would not simply arrest or even take citizenship away from some strategically chosen Democratic candidates, and throw out a few states’ electoral college votes if the state government is R but votes went D. They have already laid the groundwork. They also have a strong motivation for doing everything they can to avoid ever losing power again, as they know how much trouble they would be in if the rule of law was re-established in their lifetimes.
It is fairly frustrating to see people on social and news media continue to point at poll approval ratings as if they were of any relevance. I have in the past used the analogy of realising that my cell phone is lost when I am standing at a cliff edge and the phone is three meters below me in free fall towards the rocks and the river below. The last chance to secure the phone was when it was still in my hand. The last chance to secure US democracy was January 2021, and the Democratic leadership of the time failed completely. They and their centrist followers need to understand that democracy has now terminally slipped from their hands, and that even if they can still fund raise and squabble over primaries, one day soon masked goons may well kick even their door in.
Although I always argue for moral responsibility and agency of the voters, I am here actually slightly more forgiving than the post I am commenting on. Yes, tens of millions of comfortably well-off suburbanites have welcomed the end of democracy. They have made a vile choice, and it is ludicrous to say “but social media” or “but left behind” to make excuses for them. But there will also have been millions of rusted-on voters who were in denial about how far right the Republican party has shifted under their feet and who voted R simply out of inertia or loyalty; plus millions of swing voters who had legitimate frustrations with the incumbent party and thought that fears of dictatorship were exaggerated for electoral propaganda purposes; plus millions of even lower-information voters who vaguely thought that Trump will bring egg prices down by paying all national debt off with Bitcoin or something. He and Republicans could only win by combining all three, not only the first lot, and I honestly don’t know how large the three blocks are relative to each other. It is well possible that those who consciously welcome the end of democracy are fewer than 30% of voters. If the USA had a multi-party system, we might not be discussing the end of democracy, because everybody else could form a coalition against them.
Of course, that doesn’t help much. That’s still lots of people. And the egg price constituency should also have known what happens to the working class people under Republican presidents and maybe read up on project 2025 before casting their vote.