The latest episode of Mark Tavener’s comedy, High Table Lower Orders, includes a character who has held both the Donald Rumsfeld Chair in Peace Studies and the Bill Clinton Chair in Personal Ethics. (My University has a set of Chairs which are named by the recipients: my fantasy is to hold the Tony Hancock Chair in something, though if push ever came to shove I guess I’d go for C.L.R. James if his executors would let me). Anyway, you can do better than Mark Tavener, surely. Nominations please.
The Eastern Sociological Society annual meetings will be in Washington, D.C. this weekend at the Wyndham Hotel. I organized a mini-conference on Sociology and the Internet for it that includes a session called “Can Blogs Influence Public Policy?”. This session will be held at 8:30am this Friday. If you’re in the area and inclined to be up and about at that hour, please stop by. Panelists are as follows:
* Tyler Cowen, George Mason University (Update: Unfortunately, it turns out that Tyler Cowen won’t be able to make it.)
* Henry Farrell, George Washington University
* Eszter Hargittai, Northwestern University
* Amy Sullivan, The Washington Monthly and Princeton University
* Discussant: Jeff Weintraub, Lehigh University and University of Pennsylvania
See information about the other panels in this mini-conference below the fold. [click to continue…]
{ 3 comments }
Two good posts on the continuing slide towards routinized and euphemized torture by the U.S., one at “Body and Soul”:http://bodyandsoul.typepad.com/blog/2005/03/the_beast_in_us.html and one at “Respectful of Otters”:http://respectfulofotters.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_respectfulofotters_archive.html#111068506853331238. Jim Henley “notes”:http://highclearing.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/11/4026 a couple of recent domestic crime cases where the obvious suspects turned out not to have done it, asking “Couldn’t we have tortured the “right” people into confessing to both these crimes?” (That “real-estate arson”:http://www.jrrobertssecurity.com/security-news/security-crime-news0013.htm last year in Maryland was in that category, too.) Meanwhile, “Juan Non-Volokh”:http://www.volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_03_06-2005_03_12.shtml#1110426704 might be trying to talk himself into it through the “latest version”:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18709-2005Mar8.html of our old friend, the “ticking bomb”:https://crookedtimber.org/2004/06/18/by-the-power-of-stipulation-i-have-the-power.
{ 44 comments }
This NYT report shows how the Bush Administration has been producing covert propaganda, which is then shown on US TV stations as news, with actors posing as reporters. It would take much more than this to surprise me in relation to the Bush Administration, and in any case, the practice apparently began under Clinton.
What did strike me was that, while the NYT went in for plenty of handwringing about the government manipulating the news, the report showed no concern about the fact (news to me) that corporations have been doing this for years, more or less openly, to the extent that those involved in producing “video news releases” have their own association, annual awards and so on
Under the Bush administration, the federal government has aggressively used a well-established tool of public relations: the prepackaged, ready-to-serve news report that major corporations have long distributed to TV stations to pitch everything from headache remedies to auto insurance.
Of course, reprinting press releases with minimal editing has been a standby of lazy journalists for decades. But the standard press release story opens with what is presented as a paraphrase of a quote “In Washington today, Senator X criticised the neglect of problem Y …” or whatever. Even if the reader is led to imagine that the statement was actually made to an audience of reporters, there’s no serious deception, though a well-designed press release can certainly ensure that the writer’s key points get prominently reported in a way that makes them seem like fact rather than opinion.
But the video news release goes way beyond this. The closest analog in the print world is those supplements, designed to look like news, with “advertisement” in small print at the bottom of the page.
I don’t know anything about the legality of all this. Here in Australia, radio commentators got into a heap of strife over “cash for comment”, accepting money from corporations to say nice things about them. But this was advertising presented as opinion. Presenting advertising as news seems far worse to me.
The issue of paid-for or sponsored political comment has already arisen in relation to blogging. It seems unlikely that commercial PR can be far behind, if it isn’t here already.
{ 17 comments }
This post contains a valuable commercial opportunity for someone, but I’m giving the advice for free. If I were a publisher of art-books, a commissioner of programmes for a channel like BBC4, or the editor of an art magazine or a Sunday supplement, I’d be desperately trying to do something on the photographs of Gustav Szathmary. Szathmary was the lover of the well-known German painter Paula Modersohn-Becker, and the “Modersohn-Becker Museum”:http://www.pmbm.de/ in Bremen, Germany currently has an exhibition of his work. (He was a composer and an inventor of photographic equipment too.) I toured the exhibition yesterday with another academic (and anonoblogger) who, like me, was there for the “Social Justice Conference”:http://www.gsss.uni-bremen.de/socialjustice/ at the GSS at the University of Bremen. We were both stunned by the Szathmary’s portraits of his friends. The pictures, from about 1905, are so natural and lively that — allowing for changes in clothing in some cases — they could have been taken at any time up to last week. There’s hardly anything about Szathmary on the internet (8 hits on google and 9 on allthweb) and the only way you can see any of the photos is by “downloading the German catalogue”:http://www.cupere.de/pdf/gustav_szathmary.pdf (only a small selection, right at the end of this enormous PDF) or by visiting Bremen. There’s also “an html-page on Szathmary”:http://www.cupere.de/gustav_1.htm , linking to the catalogue, but without any of the relevant pictures.
(BTW, if anyone actually is a commissioning editor etc., reads this page, acts on it, and something comes about, I’d appreciate a free copy or an invite to the opening etc.)
Update: See also Gwydion the Magician’s take on “Gustav Szathmary and Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler”:http://gwydionthemagician.blogspot.com/2005/03/joys-of-bremen-elfriede-lohse-wchtler.html .
UPDATE: See the link from Andrew’s comment below: Szathmary appears to be a spoof character wholly invented by artist Dirk Hennig. Doh!
{ 3 comments }
Teething continues apace. Right now the main issue is with formatting. More below the fold.
Update: Now we have comment previewing and validation. We aim to please. Seems to be working OK.
{ 21 comments }
Although I read quite a bit, one thing I always have difficulty with is suggesting good readings on topics, or knowing who originally proposed some idea. I think this has something to do with the fact that I tend to flit from one topic to another, picking up ideas but rarely doing a proper review of the literature. In any case, I’ve been asked to suggest some readings and so I thought I’d pass this request on to any readers who can help me[1]. What I’d like is either an original/early source for various concepts or a more recent summary discussion, ideally one accessible to an intelligent general reader. Anyone with useful suggestions gets an acknowledgement in my forthcoming Oxford Handbook chapter which is, literally, priceless.
Here’s my list of terms
* Crowding out
* Twin deficits hypothesis
* Shadow price
* Golden rule (for budgeting in UK and elsewhere)
* Globalisation
* Crony capitalism
Thanks in advance for any help
fn1. There is a piece of blog jargon for what I’m doing here, but I refuse to even mention it. As Belle said on this point a while back, if we keep going this way, we might as well just change the word “post” to “smegma” and have done with it.
{ 14 comments }
In my first-ever blog post (apart from a Hello World! announcement), I commented on the fact that, whereas trade and current account deficits were big news in Australia, US papers buried them in the back pages. At least in the online edition of the New York Times, this is no longer the case. The latest US Trade deficit ($58.3 billion in January) is front-page news.
Despite this catch-up, it’s still true that anyone wanting coverage of economic issues in the US would do far better to read blogs than to follow either the NY Times or the WSJ, and no other mainstream media even come close. It isn’t even true, as it is in other cases, that bloggers need the established media to get the facts on which they can then comment. The NY Times story linked above is basically a rewrite of the Bureau of Economic Analysis press release which you can get by automatic email if you want.
The competition is much tougher in Australia. Media coverage of economic issues is better, the number of economist-bloggers is smaller and quite a few of us play both sides of the street anyway.
{ 10 comments }
My review of In Good Faith in the TES is now on-line (or, at least, it seems to be when I look at it). Its a book by 3 British academics about state-funded faith schools in the UK, and might be of some interest to non-Brits. who want to know how the British system works. My review doesn’t seem to have done much for its amazon sales. Here is a taster:
the authors have researched a large number of Muslim, Jewish, Greek Orthodox, Sikh, Church of England and Roman Catholic schools, and their findings make a vital contribution to the debate about faith schooling. They highlight the rise, since 1998, of non-Christian state-funded faith schools, and lay out the controversies, as well as providing a good deal of pertinent data. The authors rightly place Muslim schools at the centre of the debate about faith schooling. Islam is the largest non-Christian faith in Britain, and has the worst press. It is the only religion about which it is permissible to publicly express uninformed hostile opinions. The sagacious Lord Hattersley is quoted as pointing out that “fundamentalism is less acceptable when it is not white”. Islam has been a focal point for the new racism, and remains on the edge of mainstream British life.
{ 5 comments }
If you haven’t yet followed any of our numerous links to Scott McLemee’s columns in Inside Higher Education you might want to start by checking out this brilliant little essay about the lost art of the lecture (and no, he doesn’t pay us a cent for the links). Apparently the lecture is not only dead, but is widely regarded as
“another form of child abuse, aimed at nominal adults, of course, but still young people presumably subjugated and entrapped in an environment controlled by an authoritarian leader” — leaving them no self-defense except “to fall asleep to escape the painful environment they have paid so dearly to join.”
Worse, my former colleague Ron Barnett is quoted as saying that the lecture:
“keeps channels of communication closed, freezes hierarchy between lecturers and students and removes any responsibility on the student to respond.”
{ 35 comments }
This list is being maintained for archival purposes only. It is no longer being updated. If you wish to consult an up-to-date list, or add an academic blog, go to to the academic blogs wiki, maintained by Henry Farrell at “http://www.academicblogs.org”:http://www.academicblogs.org
- academic link policy
-
Cross-disciplinary
- Audhumlan Conspiracy
- Becker-Posner blog
- Biocurious
- Butterflies and Wheels
- Cardinal Collective
- Crescat Sententia
- Gnostical Turpitude
- Grand Text Auto
- Kikuchiyo News
- Liberty and Power
- Monkey Magic
- Obsidian Wings
- The Panda’s Thumb
- Public Intelligence
- Stone Court
- SCSU Scholars
- Terra Nova
- Tongue But No Door
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Whirled View
- WordHerders
- Yale Insider
- Charmaine Yoest
-
Political science/Political Theory
- “Abu Aardvark”
- America Abroad
- Antidotal
- ArchPundit
- Thomas Barnett
- John Baughman
- Paul Brewer
- Chris Brooke
- Josh Cherniss
- Andrew R. Cline
- Sam Crane
- Michelle Dion
- Dan Drezner
- Duck of Minerva
- Rory Ewins
- Daniel Geffen
- General Glut
- Norman Geras
- Michael Gordon
- Rick Hasen
- Steven Horn
- The Insurgent (moribund?)
- James Joyner
- Jusiper
- Loren King
- Geoff Kurtz
- Chris Lawrence
- Lawyers, Guns and Money
- James Ker-Lindsey
- Brett Marston
- Stephen Medvic
- Laura McK****
- “Nasi Lemak”
- Brendan Nyhan
- Ciaran O’Kelly
- Nathan Paxton
- Political Arguments
- Rodger Payne
- Polysigh
- R.J. Rummel
- Republic of Heaven
- Chris Sciabarra
- Matthew Shugart
- Steven L. Taylor
- Nick Troester
- Steve Weber
- Garry Young (moribund?)
-
Sociology/Public Policy
-
Economics/Finance
- Angry Bear
- Atrios
- Kevin Brancato
- Card Carrying Member
- Brad DeLong
- Division of Labour
- Econ Opinion
- Economist’s View
- Environmental Economics
- Financial Rounds
- Full Context
- Peter Gordon
- James D. Hamilton
- John Irons
- Stephen Karlson
- Stephen Kirchner
- Andrew Leigh
- Lynne Kiesling
- Jim Leitzel
- Jim Mahar
- Marginal Revolution
- Robert Metcalfe
- Kevin McCabe
- Ben Muse
- Eric Rasmusen
- Raymond Sauer
- Chris Silvey
- William Sjostrom (AtlanticBlog)
-
Philosophy/Linguistics
- David Chalmers’ philosophical weblog list
- Ad Absurdum
- Antimeta
- À Gauche
- Jeremy Alder
- Amaravati
- Anggarrgoon
- Audhumlan Conspiracy
- H.E. Baber
- Philip Blosser
- Paul Broderick
- Matt Brown
- Diana Buccafurni
- Brandon Butler
- Keith Burgess-Jackson
- Certain Doubts
- David Chalmers
- Noam Chomsky
- Consequently
- The Conservative Philosopher
- Desert Landscapes
- Doctor Freeride
- Denis Dutton
- Karl Elliott
- David Estlund
- Experimental Philosophy
- Fake Barn County
- Kai von Fintel
- Russell Arben Fox
- Garden of Forking Paths
- Roger Gathman
- Michael Green
- Scott Hagaman
- Helen Habermann
- David Hildebrand
- John Holbo
- Christopher Grau
- Jonathan Ichikawa
- Tom Irish
- Michelle Jenkins
- Adam Kotsko
- Barry Lam
- Language Hat
- Language Log
- Christian Lee
- Brian Leiter
- Stephen Lenhart
- Clayton Littlejohn
- Logic and Language
- LogBlog
- Logicomp
- Roderick T. Long
- Joshua Macy
- Mad Grad
- P.D. Magnus
- Jonathan Martin
- Joe Miller
- Matthew McGrattan
- Marc Moffett
- Geoffrey Nunberg
- Orange Philosophy
- Philosophy Carnival
- Philosophy, et cetera
- Philosophy of Art
- Prosblogion
- Douglas Portmore
- Philosophy from the 617 (moribund)
- Jeremy Pierce
- Punishment Theory
- Geoff Pynn
- Timothy Quigley (moribund?)
- Right Reason>
- Conor Roddy
- Sappho’s Breathing
- Anders Schoubye
- Wolfgang Schwartz
- Scribo
- Michael Sevel
- Tom Stoneham (moribund)
- Adam Swenson
- Peter Suber
- That Logic Blog
- Eddie Thomas
- Joe Ulatowski
- Bruce Umbaugh
- What is the name …
- Matt Weiner
- Will Wilkinson
- Jessica Wilson
- Young Hegelian
- Richard Zach
-
Psychology
-
Law
- Ann Althouse
- Stephen Bainbridge
- Jack Balkin
- Douglass A. Berman
- Francesca Bignami
- BlunkettWatch
- Jack Bogdanski
- Paul L. Caron
- China Law Prof
- Clinical Law Prof
- Compliance Law Prof
- Environmental Law Prof
- Conglomerate
- Jeff Cooper
- Disability Law
- Displacement of Concepts
- Wayne Eastman
- Eric Fink
- Victor Fleischer (on hiatus)
- Peter Friedman
- Michael Froomkin
- Bernard Hibbitts
- Walter Hutchens
- InstaPundit
- Andis Kaulins
- Adam Kolber
- Lawmeme
- Edward Lee
- Karl-Friedrich Lenz
- Larry Lessig
- Mirror of Justice
- Eric Muller
- Nathan Oman
- Opinio Juris
- John Palfrey
- Ken Parish
- Prawfsblawg
- Punishment Theory
- Larry Ribstein
- The Right Coast
- D. Gordon Smith
- Lawrence Solum
- Peter Tillers
- Transatlantic Assembly
- Lawrence Velvel
- David Wagner
- Kim Weatherall
- Yale Constitution Society
- Tun Yin
-
History
- Apocalyptic Historian
- Blogenspiel
- Blog Them Out of the Stone Age
- Timothy Burke
- Rebunk
- Naomi Chana
- Chapati Mystery
- Cliopatria
- Juan Cole
- Cranky Professor
- Greg Daly
- James Davila
- Sherman Dorn
- Michael Drout
- Early Modern Notes
- Frog in a Well
- Frogs and Ravens
- Evan Garcia
- Katrina Gulliver
- George Mason History bloggers
- Ghost in the Machine
- Rebecca Goetz
- Hiram Hover
- Invisible Adjunct (inactive)
- Jason Kuznicki
- Konrad Mitchell Lawson
- Danny Loss
- Danny Loss
- Ether MacAllum Stewart
- Pam Mack
- Heather Mathews
- James Meadway
- Medieval Studies
- H.D. Miller
- Caleb McDaniel
- Marc Mulholland
- No Great Matter
- Otto Pohl
- Received Ideas
- Renaissance Weblog
- Nathaniel Robinson
- Jacob Remes (moribund?)
- Christopher Sheil
- Red Ted
- Time Travelling Is Easy
- Brian Ulrich
- Shana Worthen
-
Computers/media/communication
- Anawim< /li>
- Lauren Andreacchi (moribund)
- Ryan Baker
- Eric Behrens
- Danah Boyd
- David Brake
- Collin Brooke
- Cprobes
- Maximilian Dornseif (moribund)
- Jeff Erickson
- Ed Felten
- Lance Fortnow
- Louise Ferguson
- Ted Friedman
- Anne Galloway
- Jason Gallo
- Josh Greenberg
- Alex Halavais
- Sariel Har-Peled
- Tracy Kennedy
- Tim Lambert
- Liz Lawley
- Andy Miah
- Michael O’Foghlu
- Jose Luis Orihuela (moribund)
- Alex Pang
- Sebastian Paquet
- Jay Pfaffman
- Public Brewery
- Fernando Pereira
- Pink Bunny of Battle
- Ranting Professors
- Jay Rosen
- Ken Rufo
- Douglas Rushkoff
- Vika Safrin
- Rob Schaap (Blogorrhoea)
- Frank Schaap
- Robert A. Stewart
- Sue Thomas
- Ray Trygstad
- Siva Vaidhyanathan
- Suresh Venkatasubramanian
- Tim Waclawski
- Jill Walker
- Phil Windley
- Zirma
-
Anthropology
-
Geography
-
Education
-
Business administration/Marketing
-
Industrial relations
-
Literature, language, culture
- AmericaSedition
- Robert Archambeau
- Mike Arnzen
- Brandon Barr
- Michael Berube
- Matthew Blackbourne
- The Blogora
- Colin Brayton
- John Bruce
- Miriam Burstein
- Chris Cagle
- Jean Chu
- Hans Coppens
- Josh Corey
- Tyler Curtain
- Cultural Revolution
- Terry Dean
- delagar
- Joseph Duemer
- Ellen and Jim
- Flaschenpost
- Kathleen Fitzpatrick
- Jonathan Goodwin
- Rachael Groner
- Deborah Gussman
- Alison Hale
- Household Opera
- Dennis Jerz
- Jason Jones
- Miriam Jones
- Pierre Joris
- Matthew Kirschenbaum
- Konvolut M
- Steven Krause
- Kultur Industrie
- Lilliputian Lilith
- Catherine Liu
- Long Sunday
- John Lovas
- Gerald Lucas
- Making Contact
- Barry Mauer
- Jonathan Mayhew
- Derek Mueller
- Erin O’Connor
- Richard Pope
- Print Culture
- Clancy Ratcliff
- Matthias Rip
- A.G. Rud
- Amardeep Singh
- Steve Shaviro
- Bruce Neil Simon
- The Tattered Coat
- Thanks … Zombie
- Third Factory
- Vera Tobin
- Chuck Tryon
- University Diaries
- Barrett Watten
-
Classics
-
Religion
-
Library Science
-
Music
-
Biology/Medicine
-
Physics/Applied Physics
-
Math/Statistics
-
Complex Systems
-
Chemistry
-
Engineering
-
University Administration
-
Architecture/Urban development
-
Earth Sciences
-
Who Knows?
-
Other sources of information
{ 5 comments }
So I’ve been experimenting with various “Textile”:http://www.textism.com/tools/textile/ plugins for WordPress. The best one so far seems to be “Text Control”:http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/TextControl, which allows for a lot of flexibility. In particular, it’s supposed to support per-post choices about which markup to use. But although I can set global options, no options menu appears when I’m editing a new post. Is this a known bug?
I’ve also been looking at various spam filters. “Spam Karma”:http://unknowngenius.com/blog/wordpress/spam-karma/ looks comprehensive, but so far has proved a little enthusiastic with the false positives. Sorry to those affected. I’ve turned down the volume on it a bit, so hopefully that will stop being a problem. Any advice on fine-tuning Spam Karma’s options?
Also, if you notice any severe slowdowns or other performance issues, please let me know.
{ 13 comments }
I suppose that every Brit who reads this site already knows about this, but the rest may not. The die-hard fans seem pleased, but it is very hard to tell whether that is just a function of the relief they feel.
When I first heard about the return I had a conversation with my favourite pop star (no, I won’t tell you who that is) who expressed skepticism: on the grounds that the only way the series can sell is by Americanising it. My skepticism is more based on the fact that the post-war social-democratic consensus is so long dead that a show that self-consciously embodied it would now seem weird; but if the doctor were not a social democrat he would not be the doctor. However, at least the Americanisation thesis seems false, given the star’s disavowal of both sexism (ha!) and RP.
{ 18 comments }
Slate runs a good debunking of romantic popular misinterpetations of Godel’s theorem. Key quote
The precise mathematical formulation that is Gödel’s theorem doesn’t really say “there are true things which cannot be proved” any more than Einstein’s theory means “everything is relative, dude, it just depends on your point of view.”
I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve seen dubious appeals to intuition or claims about chaos theory and the like supported with reference to Godel’s theorem, but I have derived the following proposition:
Quiggin’s metatheorem: Any interesting conclusion derived with reference to Godel’s theorem is unfounded.
Feel free to evaluate with reference to the post title, and your level of interest in the formalist program.
{ 83 comments }
CT has switched platforms from MovableType to WordPress. Thanks to lead WordPress developer Matt Mullenweg for doing the behind-the-scenes work on this. We hope this move will make things easier for our readers.[1] For one thing, it should be the end of double- triple- or even duodecuple-posted comments. These were becoming an embarrassing CT hallmark, thanks to our outdated installation of MovableType and way too much server load. Trackback spam and other blogging bugaboos should also become easier to manage. More generally, it’s good to move over to an open-source platform.
I expect there will be teething problems in the short-term, as we fine-tune the layout and learn how to use the new software. We hope you’ll bear with us. Right now, our main page doesn’t render properly in Safari: the right sidebar text ends up positioned on the left. This isn’t a problem on Firefox or IE. If there are any CSS gurus out there who want to suggest a fix, we’d be very grateful.
fn1. This is a test of footnotes.
{ 31 comments }